A preview of this full-text is provided by Wiley.
Content available from Aiche Journal
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Transport Phenomena and Fluid Mechanics
Particle-resolved turbulent flow in a packed bed: RANS, LES,
and DNS simulations
Aniket S. Ambekar
1
| Christoph Schwarzmeier
2
| Ulrich Rüde
2,3
| Vivek V. Buwa
1
1
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian
Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India
2
Department of Computer Science, Chair for
System Simulation, Universität Erlangen-
Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
3
Parallel Algorithms Team, CERFACS,
Toulouse, France
Correspondence
Vivek V. Buwa, Department of Chemical
Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology
Delhi, New Delhi 110016. India.
Email: vvbuwa@iitd.ac.in
Funding information
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst;
University Grants Commission; Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft
Abstract
Packed bed reactors are widely used to perform solid-catalyzed gas-phase reactions
and local turbulence is known to influence heat and mass transfer characteristics. We
have investigated turbulence characteristics in a packed bed of 113 spherical parti-
cles by performing particle-resolved Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simu-
lations, Large Eddy Simulation (LES), and Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS). The
predictions of the RANS and LES simulations are validated with the lattice Boltzmann
method (LBM)–based DNS at particle Reynolds number (Re
p
) of 600. The RANS and
LES simulations can predict the velocity, strain rate, and vorticity with a reasonable
accuracy. Due to the dominance of enhanced wall-function treatment, the turbulence
characteristics predicted by the ε-based models are found to be in a good agreement
with the DNS. The ω-based models under-predicted the turbulence quantities by
several orders of magnitude due to their inadequacy in handling strongly wall-
dominated flows at low Re
p
. Using the DNS performed at different Re
p
, we also show
that the onset of turbulence occurs between 200 ≤Rep≤250.
KEYWORDS
Direct Numerical Simulations, Large Eddy Simulations, Packed bed, Particle-resolved
simulations, Turbulence models
1|INTRODUCTION
Packed bed reactors (PBRs) have widespread applications in the
chemical process industry. One of the important applications of
these reactors is to perform solid-catalyzed reactions such as
methane-steam reforming, methanol or dimethyl ether synthesis,
water–gas shift reactions, etc. These solid-catalyzed reactions are
either exothermic or endothermic. Randomly packed porous parti-
cles, either with internal or external shaping with varying size, are
used to perform these reactions. The overall (bed-scale) performance
of the PBRs, that is, reactant conversion, product selectivity, yield,
pressure drop, and other quantities, is significantly influenced by the
particle-scale heat and mass transfer characteristics which in turn
are determined by the particle-scale flow. The particle-scale flow is
governed by the shape and size of catalyst particles. Therefore,
particle-resolved simulations of a small section of PBR (i.e., with a
few hundreds of particles) are extensively used to evaluate the
effects of particle shape, to innovate new particle shapes. and also
to analyze particle-scale heat and mass transfer (see 1–7and the ref-
erences cited therein). However, despite the extensive use of
particle-resolved computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations,
the rigorous validation of the predictions of particle-resolved simula-
tions lacks to a great extent.
One of the approaches, traditionally used to validate the particle-
resolved simulations, is to compare their predictions of bed-scale per-
formance with the predictions of semi-empirical correlations available
in the literature, for example, the pressure drop characteristics are
compared with the predictions of correlations proposed by Ergun,
1,2,7
Reichelt,
3,8
Zhavoronkov et al.,
3,4,8
and so forth. The predicted pres-
sure drops, and other bed-scale characteristics are in a reasonable
agreement with the correlations. While particle-scale CFD simulations
can predict the overall/macroscopic characteristics like pressure drop,
their ability to predict particle-scale velocity and turbulence character-
istics needs to be investigated.
Received: 22 July 2021 Revised: 16 December 2021 Accepted: 15 January 2022
DOI: 10.1002/aic.17615
1of16 © 2022 American Institute of Chemical Engineers. AIChE J. 2023;69:e17615.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/aic
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.17615