About 70 Years After The Historical "Brown v. Board of Education," Where Are American Institutions At? An Educator's Plea For Little Black Girls And Boys To Matter More In The Discourse On Race And Culturally-Connected STEM Teaching

Full text

About 70 Years After The Historical “Brown v. Board of Education,”
Where Are American Institutions At?
An Educator’s Plea For Little Black Girls and Boys to Matter More In the
Discourse on Race and Culturally-Connected STEM Teaching
Primary Author & Correspondence Sent To:
Dr. Patrice Juliet Pinder
Email: dr.patricepinder@gmail.com
Updated Re-publication Date: January 20, 2022.
© Intellectual Property of Dr. Patrice J. Pinder.
****************************************************************************************************
This short essay was written during this time of: “rising coronavirus cases, particularly
among Blacks and other minorities,” “increased racial tension,” and the call for “justice and
fairness in all systems within the UNITED States of America (U.S.).” As a highly concerned
educator, I am here renewing the “call for more equality and the addressing of the needs of
Black People within the U.S. systems, specifically focusing my attention on Little Black Girls
and Boys (our children/our students) within the American K–12 Educational system. . .”
****************************************************************************************************
Within the past few years and months, we saw the numerous protests across the
world and specifically across the various U.S. states, protests which called for social
justice, equality, and fairness for Blacks within American systems. When analyzing data
from the criminal justice system, health care system, economic strata, and the K-12
school system, Blacks continue to be place at a disadvantage within the U.S. Two years
ago, we saw and read about the popularized killings of Mr. George Floyd on May 25, 2020
in Minneapolis, Minnesota, then Mr. Rayshard Brooks on June 12, 2020 in Atlanta,
Georgia, and other young Black men; all of whom were reported to be killed by White
police officers. Statistical reports reveal that Black people make up about 13% of the U.S.
population, and although Blacks make up only 13% of the American population, they are
the racial and ethnic group 3X more likely to be killed by the police than White people and
2X more likely to be killed by police than Hispanics. Moreover, 99% of those killings, which
occurred during 2013–2019 resulted in police officers not being charged
(https://mappingpoliceviolence.org/).
With respect to the healthcare disparity and specifically the increased coronavirus
incidents among Blacks within the U.S., statistics show that although Blacks represent
about 13% of the population, they have accounted for 24.3% of known COVID-19 deaths.
In data drawn from across all states including the District of Columbia, it was reported
that for COVID-19 deaths, Black Americans represented 1 in 1,625 or 61.6 deaths per

100,000 of the population; whereas, Asian and White Americans represented about 1 in
3,800 or 26.3 deaths per 100,00 of the population. So, Asian and White Americans were
2.5X less likely to die from covid-19 than Black Americans
(https://www.apmresearchlab.org/covid/deaths-by-race).
Economic and financial data are as equally dismal for Blacks as are the healthcare
and criminal justice statistics just mentioned. According to the U.S. based Economic
Policy Institute, the rate of poverty for Black Americans fell by 12.7% over a 48 year period
from 1968–2016. However, the rate of poverty for White Americans was significantly
lower than that of Blacks (https://www.epi.org/publication/poverty-persists-50-years-after-
the-poor-peoples-campaign-black-poverty-rates-are-more-than-twice-as-high-as).
Besides the aforementioned plights of Blacks within the U.S. criminal justice and health
care systems, the educational system also speaks to an equity issue. Poorly funded
school districts and the plight of Black students within the K–12 school system is another
issue of concern. According to an article written in the Atlantic entitled “The concentration
of poverty in American schools” written by Boschma and Brownstein (Feb. 29, 2016),
they reported that most African American and Latino students attend schools where three-
quarters of all students qualify as low-income to poor. Lombardo (2019) in a National
Public Radio (NPR) Report entitled “Why White school districts have so much more
money” revealed that:
 White school districts received $23 million more than non-white school districts in
2019,
 For each student, the average non-white school district receives $2,226 less than
a white school district,
 And, more than 50% of students attend “segregated” or “racially concentrated”
schools where either three-quarters of the students are White or three-quarters are
non-white.
On May 17, 1954, almost 70 years since the landmark legal case “Brown v. Board
of Education,” the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that “separating children in public schools
on the basis of race was unconstitutional,” which was to bring “racial segregation” in the
schooling system in the U.S. to an end. But, about 70 years post legal ruling of 1954,
educators might ask, have the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court been truly upheld? Do
we see evidence of this in 2022? Additionally, given the bleak and dismal statistics on
Blacks being:
 The most likely to be arrested or killed by a police officer,
 The most likely to die of health crisis, such as the coronavirus,
 The most likely group to experience high rates of poverty and poor schooling,
As a concern educator of color, I ask, will the American education system ever evolve?
And to the point, where equality of ALL people within the various U.S. systems will occur,
will be achieved? The aforementioned alarming statistics outlined, particularly, the focus

on the alarming educational statistics for Black minority children have led to this my focus
on “little Black children within the American K–12 school system.”
Thus, this short essay stresses the necessary first step in levelling the learning
playing field to be “the promotion of more culturally-connected and culturally-sensitive
teaching and learning processes for Black students.” This essay uses a combination of
empirical studies, literature and theoretical peer-reviewed articles, and reflects upon two
important key research pieces labelled The “Black Girl Turn” in Research on Gender,
Race, and Science Education: Toward Exploring and Understanding the Early
Experiences of Black Females in Science, and Cultural-Ethnic Differences, Parental
Involvement Differences, and Educational Achievement of African Heritage Students:
Towards Employing a Culturally Sensitive Curriculum in K–12 Classrooms, A Literature
Review. Moreover, reasons for Blacks being seemingly “segregated” over the years and
not fully included in the science teaching and learning processes are highlighted as are
strategies that educators should employ in their teaching in order to create science/STEM
teaching that is more culturally-connected to Black students’ lives.
The Reasons for Blacks Being Seemingly “Segregated” and “Denied Full Access
and Inclusion” in the Science/STEM Teaching and Learning Processes
Reasons for Blacks being seemingly “segregated” and “denied full access and
inclusion” in the science/STEM teaching and learning processes might be due to historical
and cultural reasons.
Historical-Biological Reasoning
The historical exclusion of Blacks and minorities from science/STEM and the
legitimizing of it was considered linked to historical-biological beginnings (Norman, 1998;
Pinder, 2020; Pinder, 2008). Historical-biological findings, such as published studies on
the “race and brain-size debate” were popularized by the Canadian researcher Philip
Rushton and his colleagues. These studies favored and legitimized the role and place of
the “White male” in science/STEM and disallowed “Blacks” from taking up a place within
the science/STEM arenas—in the science classroom as active participants (science
students) and as deliverers of science knowledge (science instructors). Rushton (1997)
cited the research work of Robert Bennett Bean in his report. Bean (1906 as cited by
Rushton 1997; Pinder, 2020; and Pinder, 2008), a Virginia physician, published a study;
in which, he found that Blacks had less convoluted brains than Whites. He also reportedly
found that Whites had larger genus to splenium ratios (front to back part of corpus
callosum) than other racial and ethnic groups, which to him seemed to imply that Whites
had more activities in their frontal lobes than Blacks. The frontal lobe being considered
the site of intelligence. Thus, at the time, these early craniometrical and skull research
data findings led to the placement of European women, Black males, and Black females
in lower hierarchies than the White male. So, European males were placed at the top of
the skull-size continuum; whereas, Black males and Black females were placed at the

lower points of the skull-size scale, and this seemingly led to the favoring of the White or
European male role or place in science/STEM fields (Pinder, 2008).
Black Students’ Inability to Learn and Master Two Incompatible Cultures
From the 1960’s, arguments have been made that some Black students may
underperform in their schooling because of their inability to master two dissimilar
cultures—their inherited African culture (African American culture is derived from African
culture) and the European culture of the new world that their forefathers were brought to
as slaves in 1619. Socio-cultural researchers contend that some Black students may
underperform in relations to some of their White peers because of their inability to master
two incompatible cultures and their rejection of the sharply different European culture that
appears to be the dominant culture of the American K–12 school system (Boykin, 1986;
Ogbu & Simons, 1998; Ogbu, 2003; Norman et al., 2009; Norman et al., 2006; Pinder,
2013; Pinder, 2012; Pinder, 2010). Woodson (1933 as cited by Wiggan, 2007, &
Pinder, 2013) argued that Black students may feel alienated and underperform in schools
because their own experiences have been ignored in the various formal classroom
academic discourses in favor of the singular focus on the experiences and lived world
views of the dominant group.
Culturally-Biased Curriculums, Textbooks, and Media
Pinder (2020 & 2008) stated that cultural factors, such as schools’ culturally-
biased curriculums and textbooks that are steeped in negative cultural norms and
stereotypes are possible cultural factors that may explain why some Black children might
not connect to the science/STEM teaching and learning processes. Additionally, Gray
(2013) feels that “the preponderance of imagery in textbooks and media perpetuate the
notion of scientists as predominantly male and White (p. 77).” Similarly, Sadker et al.
(1989) reported that some minorities are less likely to be studied in history, read about in
literature, and additionally, math and science problems are more likely to have underlying
hints of White male stereotypical terms and illustrations. According to Gray, (2013), critics
of the traditional science curriculum have held several negative positions:
 Some see science as being presented as a series of discrete, random facts that
students are forced to memorize,
 Some see it as one in which the contributions of women, people of color, and non-
westerners are excluded,
 Others see science as being presented and taught from a deeply European and
westernized perspective.
Strategies Educators Should Employ In their teaching In Order To Promote
Racially and Culturally-Connected Science/STEM Teaching

It is felt that popular images portrayed by television, print ads, and films of Blacks as
entertainers, athletes, and thugs might lead to Black students unconsciously developing
an affinity to these representations of Black success rather than developing an affinity to
representations of success portrayed by scientists, mathematicians, and engineers
(Gray, 2013). In beginning to address the cultural-disconnection of Black students in the
science process, Gray feels that several things need to happen: 1) educators need to first
examine and reflect on ways to counter the negative images and stereotypes of Black
people, and (2) educators need to actively seek to dispel the notion that being Black and
being a scientist are incompatible thoughts.
Similarly, Pinder (2013) expressed “a need for culturally-sensitive curriculums to be
utilized that truly serve the needs of students of African descent.” Thus, it is felt that “rather
than employing a one-curriculum fits all approach in teaching,” teachers and
administrators need to realize that in order for ethnically diverse students to do well, the
standard curriculums have to be revamped to be more inclusive. To this end, Pinder
(2020 & 2008) offered several critical strategies for teachers to use to eliminate racial and
culturally-biased teaching and to improve students’ intrinsic (internal) and external
motivational desires to learn (Blackwell & Pinder, 2014):
 learn about students’ culture through observations of students’ behavior in the
classrooms and on the playgrounds,
 ask students questions about their cultural practices and preferences,
 talk to parents about their cultural practices and preferences,
 study published research on student groups to learn more about each student’s
group type, and
 study the history of slavery and the adaptation of descendants of slaves to learn
more about the ancestral background of Black and African students; those
students of African ancestry.
References
Blackwell, E., & Pinder, P. J. (2014). What are the motivational factors of first-generation
minority college students who overcome their family histories to pursue higher
education? College Student Journal, 48(1), 45–56.
Boschma, J., & Brownstein, R. (Feb. 29, 2016). The concentration of poverty in
American schools. Next America: Communities. The Atlantic.
Boykin, A. W. (1986). The triple quandary and the schooling of Afro-American children.
In U. Neisser (Ed.), The school achievement of minority children: New perspectives
(pp. 57–92). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gray, S. T. (2013). Black students in science: More than meets the eye. In P. J. Pinder &
E. Blackwell (Eds.), Issues and innovations in STEM education research:
Theoretical and empirical studies by early career researchers (pp. 66–84).
Untested Ideas Research Center.

Lombardo, C. (Feb. 26, 2019). Why White school districts have so much more money.
NPR. https://www.npr.org/2019/02/26/696794821
/why-white-school-districts-have-so-much-more-money
Norman, O. (1998). Marginalized discourses and scientific literacy. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 35(4), 365–374.
Norman, O., Pinder, P. J., Crunk, S., & Butler, B. (2009, April). The thorny issue of
Black students’ academic aspirations: Stigmatizing or empirically warranted?
Paper presented at the International American Educational Research Association
Conference (AERA), San Diego, CA.
Norman, O., Crunk, S., Butler, B., Pinder, P. (2006, April). Do Black adolescents
value education less than White peers? An empirical and conceptual attempt at
putting a thorny question in perspective. Paper presented at the International
American Educational Research Association Conference (AERA), San
Francisco, CA.
Ogbu, J. U. (2003). Black American students in an affluent suburb: A study of academic
disengagement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ogbu, J. U., & Simons, H. D. (1998). Voluntary and involuntary minorities. A cultural
ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education.
Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 29(2), 155–188.
Pinder, P. J. (2020). The renewed call for little Black children to matter more in the
discourse on race and culturally-connected science teaching. International
Journal of Education and Culture, 9(3–4), 31–35.
Pinder, P. J. (2013). Cultural, ethnic differences, parental involvement differences, and
educational achievement of African heritage students: Towards employing a
culturally sensitive curriculum in K–12 classrooms, a literature review. Journal of
African American Studies, 17, 116–128.
Pinder, P. J. (2012, summer). Afro-Caribbean and African American students, family
factors, and the influence on science performance in the United States: The
untold story. Journal Education, 132(4), 725–738 (EJ994236). ERIC.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ994236.
Pinder, P. J. (2010, May). An exploration of the impact of family background factors on
the science achievement of Afro-Caribbean and African American students in the
United States. Morgan State University doctoral dissertation. UMI/ProQuest
digital dissertation/Thesis publication
Pinder, P. J. (2008). The “Black girl turn” in research on gender and science education:
Toward exploring and understanding the early experiences of Black females in
science. A literature Review. (ED499925). ERIC.
https://www.files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/Ed499925.pdf
Rushton, J. P. (1997). Race, intelligence, and the brain: The errors and omissions of the
revised edition of S. J. Gould’s The mis-measure of a man (1996). Personality and
Individual Differences, 23(1), 69–180.
Sadker, M., Sadker, D., & Steindam, S. (1989). Gender equity and educational reform.
Educational Leadership, 46(6), 44–47.
Wiggan, G. (2007). Race, school achievement, and educational inequality: toward a
student-based inquiry perspective. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 310–

333.
About the Author
Dr. Patrice Juliet Pinder, Ed.D., M.Sc., B.Sc. (Honors), & A.A.,
Dr. Patrice Juliet Pinder, is a recognized World-Class Educator/Education
Research Scientist, recently listed among the “Best Education Scientists in the World” for
2021 and 2022 (First Ever, AD Scientific Index of World Scientists & Universities, 2021 &
2022). For 2021, she has also been identified by the U.S. National Council for Black Studies’
(NCBS’) Publication Committee as a “Leading Scholar” and “Expert” for her work which
advocates for the advancement of Black and African children in K–12 schools. A
multitalented, multidimensional scholar, Dr. Pinder created educational games and
strategic game-based learning interventions for teachers, students, and thus schools in
the U. S., Archipelago of the Bahamas, and the twin islands of Trinidad and Tobago.
Dr. Pinder is a native of The Bahamas and was educated and trained in the United
States of America. Specifically, Dr. Pinder has earned an A.A. degree in Biology from the
College of the Bahamas, a B.Sc. (Honors) degree in Biology with a minor in English from
Jacksonville State University, a M.Sc. degree in Plant and Soil Sciences from Alabama A

& M University, and a Doctoral Degree in Education with a specialization in Science
Education from Morgan State University. She did further research training in the areas
of STEM education and Environmental Planning. She did two postdoctoral research
fellowship training in STEM education at Indiana University, the University of the West
Indies in Trinidad and Tobago, and did postgraduate training in Urban and Regional
Planning with a specialization in Environmental Planning at Alabama A & M University.
She also participates in continuous Professional Development Global conferences,
workshops, and webinars with institutions worldwide in the areas of Sciences, STEM,
Technology, Literacy, and Educational areas of program and institutional accreditation
at the K-12 and college/university levels, programs and curriculum reviews. She has
completed professional development and continuing education events with the likes of
the University of California at Berkeley’s Lawrence Hall of Science (led by Associate
Director of Lawrence Hall of Science, Dr. Jacqueline Barber, Literacy and Science Education)
and Florida International University’s (FIU’s) Professional Development and Continuing
Education Department (Technology Education).
Dr. Pinder has 16 years of training and work experiences in the field of education,
specifically Science/STEM education. Additionally, her research work and industry
experience began in the Bahamas in 1998 at the Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) where
she served in two areas; first, the Medical Microbiology Unit, and later the Pharmacy
Department. She has given academic lectures, presented at Brown Bag sessions, and has
presented at regional and international conferences in countries such as: the U.S.,
Bahamas, China, Trinidad and Tobago, and Greece (Europe). She has published peer-
reviewed journal articles, and a STEM Education Research Book “Issues and Innovations
in STEM Education Research: Theoretical and Empirical Studies by Early Career Researchers.”
Currently, Pinder is an International Education Consultant, University Professor, and
PhD Advisor with Global Humanistic University (GHU), Dutch Netherlands Curacao.
She is also an Editor-in-chief for the International Journal of Education and Culture (IJEC),
Associate Editor of China, US Education (CUED) Journal, and has been invited to serve as
a peer-reviewer for Top Ranked International Journals, such as: Wiley’s Journal Science
Education, Elsevier and University of North Carolina’s Social Science Research Journal,
Springer and University of Toronto’s School of Education Canadian Journal of Science,
Mathematics, and Technology, Howard University’s School of Education’s Journal of Negro
Education, and has served as an invited Article Editor and Reviewer for SAGE Open
Journal, STEM Education Articles Reviewer. Dr. Pinder looks to continue to excel in her
field and to build a series of legacy programs and projects to advance ALL children in
STEM especially underrepresented children of color, both little girls and boys. She wants
to be that “Professor, Research Scientist, and STEM Educator without Borders Who Never
Wants to Be Defined or Confined by the Limits Posed by Geographic Borders.”
****************************************************************************************************