ChapterPDF Available

Lessons for Left Populism: Organizing Revolt in Babylon

Authors:

Abstract

This study on the original Rainbow Coalition provides a few correctives to the scholarship on populism. First, contrary to what Müller (2016) argues, the Rainbow Coalition shows that populism can be pluralistic. Second, while the example largely exemplifies Rogers Smith’s tripartite theory of political peoplehood as being an interlocked story of political, economic, and ethically constitutive peoplehood, the Rainbow Coalition also shows how a moderate story of peoplehood can utilize a common enemy to mobilize this ethically constitutive story of peoplehood (something that Smith does not build into his theory). Third, the Rainbow Coalition challenges viewing populism solely through its stylistic elements.
Warning concerning copyright restrictions:
The copyright law of the United States (Title
17, United States Code) governs the
making of photocopies or other
reproductions of copyrighted material.
Under certain conditions specified in the
law, libraries and archives are authorized to
furnish a photocopy or other reproduction.
One of these specified conditions is that the
photocopy of reproduction is not to be used
for any purpose other than private study,
scholarship, or research. If a user makes a
request for, or later uses, a photocopy or
reproduction for purposes in excess of fair
use, that user may be liable for copyright
infringement.
This institution reserves the right to refuse
to accept a copying order if, in its judgment,
fulfillment of the order would involve
violation of Copyright Law.
Copyright ©
Further duplication of this material is not permitted
... With regard to the postwar world, scholars have analyzed a plethora of social movements in various sociopolitical settings. The multiracial Rainbow Coalition in Chicago (Illuzzi 2020), Solidarnosc (Solidarity) in Poland (di Tella 1997;Laclau 2005), the East German Monday demonstrations in Leipzig (Pfaff 2006), the 1989 Chinese democracy movement (Zuo and Benford 1995), the jan andolan of the mid-1990s in Uttarakhand (Kumar 2011), anti-IMF movements in Latin America during the 1980s (Walton and Seddon 1994), grassroots movements that paved the way for Evo Morales in Bolivia and Rafael Correa in Ecuador (Collins 2014), the tradition of progressive communitarian activism in the United States (Boyte and Riessman 1986; Grattan 2016), and the case of radical environmental movements (Beeson 2019;Szasz 1994) are all examples where populism has been employed as a core explanatory concept or as a feature that addresses particular aspects of left-wing mobilization. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Populism is a type of anti‐establishment discourse enunciated in the name of “the People” and utilized by various social actors such as politicians, journalists, academics, artists, and ordinary citizens. In the field of social movement studies, the phenomenon is best understood and analyzed as a collective action frame. Populist framing proceeds from feelings of injustice and indignation and offers a certain problematization and assigned meaning to a situation. In its diagnostic component, it attributes injustice to a corrupt system of power that only serves the interests of a minority of elite stakeholders. In its prognostic component, it suggests a repertoire and an action plan in order to enforce checks on oligarchic intrusion and to ultimately restore a just balance between popular aspirations and governance. In its motivational component, populist framing issues an urgent call for mass mobilization as a political and moral duty of the People – from whom the state is supposed to derive its authority – but whose sovereignty has been robbed by a self‐perpetuating and unresponsive elite.
Article
Full-text available
Populist politics are an increasingly prominent feature of contemporary politics around the world. In settler colonies, Indigenous resurgence is also an increasingly important feature of political contestation. Both discourses involve questions of peoplehood, pluralism, and collective agency. The goal of this paper is to explore these phenomena side by side, and ask what they reveal about the present political conjuncture. I argue that both political projects involve a constructive element, as actors build spaces of political contestation beyond the state. In this way, each movement involves an often overlooked contest between politics ‘from above’ and ‘from below’. Ultimately, I conclude that the above/below distinction reveals important cleavages that are obscured by the traditional left/right distinction that structures much political analysis.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.