A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ARTICLE
The immigrant birthweight paradox in an urban cohort: Role of
immigrant enclaves and ambient air pollution
MyDzung T. Chu
1,2,3
✉, Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba
4
, M. Patricia Fabian
5
, Kevin James Lane
5
, Tamarra James-Todd
1,6
,
David R. Williams
7,8
, Brent A. Coull
1,9
, Fei Carnes
5
, Marisa Massaro
10
, Jonathan I. Levy
5
, Francine Laden
1,6,11
, Megan Sandel
4
,
Gary Adamkiewicz
1,12
and Antonella Zanobetti
1,12
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2021
BACKGROUND: Foreign-born Black and Latina women on average have higher birthweight infants than their US-born
counterparts, despite generally worse socioeconomic indicators and prenatal care access, i.e., “immigrant birthweight paradox”
(IBP). Residence in immigrant enclaves and associated social-cultural and economic benefits may be drivers of IBP. Yet, enclaves
have been found to have higher air pollution, a risk factor for lower birthweight.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association of immigrant enclaves and children’s birthweight accounting for prenatal ambient air
pollution exposure.
METHODS: In the Boston-based Children’s HealthWatch cohort of mother-child dyads, we obtained birthweight-for-gestational-age
z-scores (BWGAZ) for US-born births, 2006–2015. We developed an immigrant enclave score based on census-tract percentages of
foreign-born, non-citizen, and linguistically-isolated households statewide. We estimated trimester-specificPM
2.5
concentrations
and proximity to major roads based residential address at birth. We fit multivariable linear regressions of BWGAZ and examined
effect modification by maternal nativity. Analyses were restricted to nonsmoking women and term births.
RESULTS: Foreign-born women had children with 0.176 (95% CI: 0.092, 0.261) higher BWGAZ than US-born women, demonstrating
the IBP in our cohort. Immigrant enclave score was not associated with BWGAZ, even after adjusting for air pollution exposures.
However, this association was significantly modified by maternal nativity (p
interaction
=0.014), in which immigrant enclave score was
positively associated with BWGAZ for only foreign-born women (0.090, 95% CI: 0.007, 0.172). Proximity to major roads was
negatively associated with BWGAZ (−0.018 per 10 m, 95% CI: −0.032, −0.003) and positively correlated with immigrant enclave
scores. Trimester-specificPM
2.5
concentrations were not associated with BWGAZ.
SIGNIFICANCE: Residence in immigrant enclaves was associated with higher birthweight children for foreign-born women,
supporting the role of immigrant enclaves in the IBP. Future research of the IBP should account for immigrant enclaves and assess
their spatial correlation with potential environmental risk factors and protective resources.
Keywords: Immigrants; Race and ethnicity; Maternal and child health; Health inequality; Air pollution; Immigrant enclaves;
Birthweight
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (2022) 32:571–582; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-021-00403-8
INTRODUCTION
Immigrants are a rapidly growing population in the United States
(US). By the year 2065, immigrants and subsequent generations
will account for 88% of the country’s growth or ~103 million
people [1]. As such, research that investigates drivers of perinatal
health outcomes among immigrants is critical for shaping the
health of future generations.
Low birthweight is a leading cause of infant mortality and
morbidity in the US and associated with learning, social, and
motor developmental delays and chronic diseases later in life [2].
Approximately 8.2% of babies in the US are low birthweight
(<2500 g) and 9.4% are preterm (<37 weeks) [2]. Racial/ethnic
disparities in low birthweight are well-documented, with Black
and Latina mothers having a higher risk of low birthweight
Received: 1 October 2020 Revised: 16 November 2021 Accepted: 17 November 2021
Published online: 4 January 2022
1
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
2
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Milken Institute
School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
3
Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA,
USA.
4
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
5
Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Boston University,
Boston, MA, USA.
6
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
7
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan
School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
8
Department of African and African American Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
9
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.
H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
10
Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
11
Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
12
These authors contributed
equally: Gary Adamkiewicz, Antonella Zanobetti. ✉email: mchu1@tuftsmedicalcenter.org
www.nature.com/jes
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
1234567890();,:
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved