ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

The locality Seweckenberge (near Quedlinburg) yielded, during the quarrying of gypsum, a large amount of Pleistocene fossils; remains that inspired Otto von Guericke in 1678 to reconstruct the famous Magdeburger Einhorn (i. e., "Magde burg Unicorn") or Guericke-Einhorn. For his reconstruction he made use of skeletal parts of recent as well as fossil, Pleistocene material collected in 1663 at the locality Seweckenberge. The Pleistocene faunal assemblage is rather diverse and includes different species of the so-called Mammoth Steppe biome. One of these species is the Woolly rhinoceros. A skull fragment of a juvenile individual with an age of ca. 1.5 years, described in this paper, is stored in the collection of the Museum für Naturkunde und Vorgeschichte Dessau (Museum of Natural History and Prehistory Dessau) in Dessau-Roßlau.
39The Beef behind all Possible Pasts – The Tandem-Festschrift in Honour of Elaine Turner and Martin Street
THIJS VAN KOLFSCHOTEN · ANGELIKA HESSE
THE WOOLLY RHINOCEROS FROM SEWECKENBERGE
NEAR QUEDLINBURG (GERMANY)
Abstract
The locality Seweckenberge (near Quedlinburg) yielded, during the quarrying of gypsum, a large amount of Pleistocene
fossils; remains that inspired Otto von Guericke in 1678 to reconstruct the famous Magdeburger Einhorn (i. e.,
“Magde burg Unicorn”) or Guericke-Einhorn. For his reconstruction he made use of skeletal parts of recent as well as
fossil, Pleistocene material collected in 1663 at the locality Seweckenberge. The Pleistocene faunal assemblage is rather
diverse and includes different species of the so-called Mammoth Steppe biome. One of these species is the Woolly
rhinoceros. A skull fragment of a juvenile individual with an age of ca. 1.5 years, described in this paper, is stored in
the collection of the Museum für Naturkunde und Vorgeschichte Dessau (Museum of Natural History and Prehistory
Dessau) in Dessau-Roßlau.
Keywords
Guericke-Einhorn, mammoth steppe biome, Woolly rhinoceros, Coelodonta antiquitatis
INTRODUCTION
The locality Seweckenberge (Saxony-Anhalt, Germany) plays an important role in the history of the Unicorn
myth; the legend of an animal that is nowadays often depicted as a horse with a large, pointed, spiralling
horn projecting from its forehead, and in some cases with a goat’s beard and cloven hooves. The legend goes
far back in time and is geographically widespread; it originates most probably from India or south-east Asia
inspired by the appearance of the Indian One-horned Rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) but also (fossils of)
the Woolly rhinoceros (Coelodonta antiquitatis), the Woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) and the
Aurochs (Bos primigenius) could have been a source of inspiration (Gröning and Brauckmann, 2011). How-
ever, the fossil Siberian Unicorn (Elasmotherium sibiricum) should not be excluded as base for the unicorn
legend. Recent investigations indicated that the very large, Eurasian rhinoceros existed to at least 39,000
years ago, living at the same time as modern humans (Kosintsev et al., 2019; Kuitems et al., 2019).
There have been several attempts to reconstruct the mythical unicorn. Well known is the Magdeburger Ein-
horn (i. e., “Magdeburg Unicorn”) or Guericke-Einhorn reconstruction undertaken in 1678 by the German
inventor and scientist Otto von Guericke (Fig. 1), and among others mayor of the city of Magdeburg.
Gue ri cke’s reconstruction got lost but fortunately, there are drawings of the creature he made: the oldest pic-
ture is published in 1714 by Valentini (see Oekentorp, 1994); well known is the drawing published by Leibniz
(1749) (Fig. 1: b). These drawings form the base for 3D models of the “Guericke-Einhorn” (Fig. 2), for exam-
ple the one that is on display in the Museum für Naturkunde (i. e., Natural History Museum) in Magdeburg
(Germany) or the Otto von Guericke’s unicorn skeleton, exhibited near the Zoo in Osnabrück (Germany).
The drawings, although not very detailed, show that Otto von Guericke made use of skeletal parts of recent
as well as fossil animals for his reconstruction of the unicorn. The corn is most probably the “tusk” from a
narwhale (Monodon monoceros), a medium-sized whale that lives in the Arctic waters around Greenland,
In: S. Gaudzinski-Windheuser · O. Jöris (Eds.), The Beef behind all Possible Pasts. The Tandem-Festschrift in Honour of
Elaine Turner and Martin Street. Monographien des RGZM 157 (Mainz 2021). DOI: 10.11588/propylaeum.868.c11306
40 T. van Kolfschoten · A. Hesse · The Woolly Rhinoceros from Seweckenberge near Quedlinburg
Canada, and Russia. The left upper canine of the narwhale males form a spirally twisted, long tusk with a
length up to more than 3 m. The skull of the unicorn looks like a fossil skull of a Woolly rhinoceros and the
shoulder blades and the bones of the two front legs are from the extinct Woolly mammoth. The original
species of the other unicorn bones is / are unclear. The fossil material Otto von Guericke used for his recon-
struction is Pleistocene in age and was collected at the locality Seweckenberge near Quedlinburg (Gröning
and Brauckmann, 2011).
SEWECKENBERGE / SEWECKEN HILLS
The Seweckenberge (i. e., Sewecken Hills; 51° 47’ N; 11° 8’ E) are located in the eastern foreland of the
Harz mountains ca. 4 km east-south-east of the city of Quedlinburg. The hills are a part of the Quedlin-
burg Anticline and are formed by the erosion-resistant beds of the mid-Triassic Muschelkalk series. The
Middle Muschelkalk consists mainly of dolomitic marl and cellular limestone with embedded gypsum rocks
formed by the evaporation of salt-water. Due to the weathering and dissolution of the Muschelkalk, karst
a b
Fig. 1 Drawings of the Guericke-Einhorn. a after Valentini (1714) (redrawn by Elke Gröning after Oekentorp, 1994); b after Leibniz
(1749) (redrawn by Elke Gröning). – (Drawings from Gröning and Brauckmann, 2011).
41The Beef behind all Possible Pasts – The Tandem-Festschrift in Honour of Elaine Turner and Martin Street
Fig. 2 3D model of the Guericke-Einhorn on display at the Museum für Naturkunde (Natural History Museum) in Magdeburg (Germany). –
(Photo: Michael Buchwitz, Museum für Naturkunde Magdeburg).
42 T. van Kolfschoten · A. Hesse · The Woolly Rhinoceros from Seweckenberge near Quedlinburg
phenomena such as sinkholes, pipes and dolines developed. These karst features formed traps where, in
particular, Pleistocene animals accumulated. Quarries were made in the Muschelkalk layers to mine the
valuable, extremely pure gypsum (Selenite) and in these quarries the dolines and other karst features, rich
in Pleistocene fossils, got exposed. Flint artefacts and human remains indicate human presence at the site
(Wüst, 1906).
Taxa Common name Taxonomic classication
used by Nehring (1904)
AMPHIBIA
Rana sp. frog Rana sp.
AVES
Hirundo rustica barn swallow Hirundo rustica L. (H. fossilis Giebel)
Anser sp. waterfowl Anser sp.
Anas sp. dabbling ducks Anas sp. (A. bochas L.?)
Anas crecca Eurasian teal Anas crecca L.
Lagopus sp. ptarmigan Lagopus sp. (Lagop. albus Keys. U. Blas.?)
MAMMALIA
Rodentia
Hystrix sp. porcupine Hystrix sp. (hisutirostris Brdt?)
Spermophilus rufescens russet ground squirrel Spermophilus rufescens Keys. U. Blas.
Cricetus cricetus hamster Cricetus vulgaris Lesk
Dicrostonyx torquatus Arctic lemming Myodus (Cuniculus) torquatus Pall.
Lemmus lemmus Norway lemming Myodes obensis Pall. (M. lemmus Hensel)
Microtus gregalis narrow-headed vole Arvicola (Microtus) gregalis Pall.
Alactaga major great jerboa Alactaga saliens fossilis Nhrg.
Lagomorpha
Ochotona sp. pika Lagomys sp. (pusillus Pall.?)
Lepus sp. hare Lepus sp. (timidus ant.?)
Carnivora
Canis aureus golden jackal Canis aureus L. Var.
Vulpes lagopus Arctic fox Canis (Vulpes) lagopus L.
Vulpes vulpes red fox Canis vulpes L. (Vulpes vulgaris)
Mustela eversmanii steppe polecat Foetorius Eversmanni Lesson
Ursus sp. bear Ursus sp.
Crocuta crocuta spelaea cave hyena Hyaena spelaea Blumenb. (H. crocuta foss.)
Perissodactyla
Coelodonta antiquitatis woolly rhinoceros Rhinoceros tichorhinus Cuv.
Equus sp. horse Equus caballus ferus Pall.
Artiodactyla
Megaloceros giganteus giant deer Cervus euryceros Pohl.
Rangifer tarandus reindeer Cervus tarandus L.
Bison sp. bison Bison sp. (priscus?)
Tab. 1 Fauna list of the fossil vertebrate assemblage described by Nehring (1904) collected by Dr. Lampe (Quedlinburg) in 1903-1904
from a doline exposed in one of the quarries in the Sevecken Hills.
43The Beef behind all Possible Pasts – The Tandem-Festschrift in Honour of Elaine Turner and Martin Street
b
THE SEWECKENBERGE PLEISTOCENE FOSSIL RECORD
The Pleistocene fossils Otto von Guericke used for his reconstruction, were found in 1663 (Gröning and
Brauckmann, 2011). Carl-Andreas Bischof collected Pleistocene fossils in the period before 1863 (Ludwig,
2012) and part of his collection is nowadays stored in the Museum fur Naturkunde und Vorgeschichte Dessau
(Museum of Natural History and Prehistory Dessau) in Dessau-Roßlau. Lampe (Quedlinburg) collected in 1903-
1904 a large amount of Pleistocene vertebrate fossils from a doline exposed in one of the quarries in the
Sewecken Hills; this collection is stored in the Museum für Naturkunde (Museum of Natural History) Berlin.
Alfred Nehring (1845-1904), a German zoologist and palaeontologist, published an extensive description
of the Lampe collection (Nehring, 1904). Nehring identied 26 different species: amphibia, birds and small
rodents as well as large mammals (Tab. 1). The fauna is diverse; rodents and carnivores are well represented
with respectively seven and six species (Nehring, 1904). Remarkable is the absence in Nehring’s list of the
Woolly mammoth.
The Sewecken Hill fauna, listed by Nehring (1904) is dominated by smaller mammal species that inhabit a
dry steppe environment. The occurrence of the Arctic lemming indicates rather cold climatic conditions. It is
a
5 cm
Fig. 3 The Seweckenberge rhino ceros skull fragment in the collection of the Museum für Natur kunde und Vorgeschichte Dessau
(Museum of Natural History and Prehistory Dessau) in Dessau-Roßlau (MNVD- G 11.144). a occlusal view; b lingual view. – (Photo: Thijs
van Kolfschoten).
44 T. van Kolfschoten · A. Hesse · The Woolly Rhinoceros from Seweckenberge near Quedlinburg
a fauna that is characteristic for the Late Pleistocene Mammoth Steppe ecosystem (Markova and van Kolf-
schoten, 2008; Markova et al., 2019) and the small mammal assemblage shows similarities with for example
the fauna from Villa Seckendorff at Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt (von Koenigswald, 1985). H.-D. Kahlke (1975)
mentions a fossil of a Saiga Antilope, Saiga tartarica, from the Sewecken Hills excavated in 1728. The nd
conrms the assumption that the Pleistocene fauna inhabited a steppe environment.
The Sewecken Hill Pleistocene fossils in the Museum für Naturkunde und Vorgeschichte Dessau in Dessau-
Roßlau, collected by Carl-Andreas Bischof, is rather limited. It includes a mandible (MNVD-G 9237) and
two vertebrae (MNVD-G 9203) of a hyena (Crocuta crocuta spelaea), a canine and a distal end of a femur
(MNVD-G 9204) of a cave bear (Ursus spelaeus), a mandible fragment with a molar (MNVD-G 9235) of a
bison (Bison sp.) and a mandible fragment and a molar (MNVD-G 9231) of a bovid (Bos sp.). A very special
Sewecken Hill nd in the Dessau collection, described in the paper, is a skull fragment (MNVD-G 11.144) of
a juvenile rhinoceros obtained from Bischof in 1869.
THE RHINO SKULL FRAGMENT
The fossil remnant MNVD-G 11.144 consists of a fragmented part of the left side of a skull of a juvenile rhi-
noceros, embedded in ne grained sediment (Fig. 3). The specimen includes (fragments of) four dental ele-
ments: P2, DP3, DP4 and M1. The P2 is only represented by the anterior part of the ectoloph which shows
a well-developed parastyle and a prominent paracone fold
1. The parastyle is unworn and the upper part
of the paracone fold is broken off. The DP3 is damaged; the outer side of the ectoloph as well as the inner
side of the molar are (partly) missing. Hence, the possible occurrence of an internal cingulum is unknown.
The DP3 shows a well-developed multiple crochet and a crista and a closed medifossette. The enamel is thin
and the molar is only slightly worn. The DP4 is also damaged; the outer side of the ectoloph as well as the
inner side of the molar are (partly) missing. The DP4 shows a well-developed single crochet and a crista and
a closed medifossette. The enamel is thin and the molar is only slightly worn. The M1 is incomplete; only
the anterior half of the ectoloph of the molar is clearly visible. It shows a well-developed parastyle and a
prominent paracone fold. The molar is unerupted and hence, not worn.
SPECIES IDENTIFICATION
The morphology of the DP3 and DP4, and in particular the closed medifossette, indicate that the specimen
should be attributed to the Woolly rhinoceros (Coelodonta antiquitatis). The medifossette of the upper
milk molars of other possible Late Pleistocene species Stephanorhinus kirchbergensis and Stephanorhinus
hemitoechus is open or very rarely closed whereas it is closed in the upper deciduous molars of Coelodonta
antiquitatis (Guerin, 1980); a feature that is also visible in the Woolly rhinoceros deciduous upper molars
from the Tomsk Priob’e area of southeast Western Siberia, published by Shpansky (2014).
Table 2 lists the dimensions of the Seweckenberge rhinoceros dental elements and Table 3 shows that dimen-
sions of the Seweckenberge rhinoceros milk molars are rather small compared to the size range of the Coelo-
donta antiquitatis milk molars from other European Pleistocene localities presented by Guerin (1980) (Fig. 4).
1 The terminology used in the description is based on Guerin (1980) and Lacombat (2006).
45The Beef behind all Possible Pasts – The Tandem-Festschrift in Honour of Elaine Turner and Martin Street
THE INDIVIDUAL AGE
The most complete molars of the specimen are small in size, low crowned and the enamel is thin; features
that indicate that we are dealing with deciduous / milk molars. Hillman-Smith et al. (1986) published age
estimation criteria for the southern White rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum) and dened for the
molars ten different tooth eruption and wear stages as well as XVI different age classes. Assuming that the
eruption sequence and the wear pattern of the White rhinoceros and the extinct Woolly rhinoceros are com-
parable, the Seweckenberge juvenile rhino skull fragment would fall at the transition of the age classes IV
to V, indicating an age at death of ca. 1.5 years.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
The occurrence of a specimen of a Woolly rhinoceros in the Seweckenberge fossil assemblage is not new.
Nehring (1904) mentions the presence of two individuals: three upper milk molars of a single young indi-
vidual and limb bones of an older rhino. The fauna composition of the assemblage indicates a so-called
Mammoth Steppe environment; conditions that were common in Central Europe during most of the Middle
and Late Pleistocene. The Woolly rhinoceros, Coelodonta antiquitatis, is part of the Mammoth Steppe fauna
association in Central Europe since the Elsterian (Marine Isotope Stage 12) when it immigrated from the
east (Kahlke and Lacombat, 2008); the species occurred in Central Europe, with some interruptions, until
ca. 11 ka BP (Stuart and Lister, 2012; Markova et al., 2013). The Woolly rhinoceros is rather common in the
Middle and Late Pleistocene fossil record of Europe.
Seweckenberge
Coelodonta antiquitatis
N min. max. mean
DP3
lenght 30.5 27 31 45.5 41.96
width 29.5 28 31.5 42 37.11
height 26 7 25 33.5 29.79
DP4
lenght 43 20 44 57 48.60
width 38 23 39 55 43.35
height 7 33.5 46 40.00
Tab. 3 The dimensions (mm) of the Seweckenberge rhinoceros milk molars compared to the size range of Coelodonta
antiquitatis milk molars from other European Pleistocene localities presented by Guerin (1980).
P2 DP3 DP4 M1
lenght 30.5 43
width 29.5 38
height 31.5 26 44
Tab. 2 Dimensions (mm) of the dental elements of the Seweckenberge rhinoceros. Because
of the poor preservation, most of the measurements are estimations.
46 T. van Kolfschoten · A. Hesse · The Woolly Rhinoceros from Seweckenberge near Quedlinburg
Due to the incomplete and poor conservation of the nds, it is unfortunately not possible to establish the
cause of death of the young rhinoceros described in this paper. The int artefacts and the human remains,
found at the site (according to Wüst, 1906) might suggest the possibility that humans might have killed
the animal. The fossil record of the localities Biache-Saint-Vaast (France) and Taubach (Germany) indicate
the hunting / butchering of the two different rhinoceros species Stephanorhinus kirchbergensis and Steph-
anorhinus hemitoechus (Dusseldorp, 2009), the evidence of hominin / human hunting of the Woolly rhino-
ceros is, however, very limited or absent. The Middle Palaeolithic site Lingjing (Xuchang, Henan, China),
yielded a large amount of (stone) artefacts as well as butchered larger mammal remains (van Kolfschoten
et al., 2020). A large bovid (Bos primigenius) and an equid (Equus przewalskii) dominate the faunal assem-
blage. The age prole of both taxa shows the dominance of prime adults which suggests that both taxa
were hunted by humans. The Lingjing fossils record also includes a large number of fossil Woolly rhinoceros
remains of at least nine different individuals; the majority is juvenile. The difference in age prole, combined
with the absence of butchering marks on the rhinoceros bones, suggests that the Woolly rhinoceros has not
been hunted / killed by humans. They died, most probably, a natural death. And we assume that this is also
the case with the juvenile rhinoceros from Seweckenberge.
The Seweckenberge rhinoceros is another conrmation of the occurrence of the Woolly rhinoceros in Cen-
tral Europe during the Middle and Late Pleistocene. The rhinoceros skull fragment in the Dessau collection
is, however, special because of its indirect link with the Magdeburger Einhorn or Guericke-Einhorn.
Fig. 4 The Woolly rhinoceros Coelodonta antiquitatis. – (Drawing: Elke Gröning).
47The Beef behind all Possible Pasts – The Tandem-Festschrift in Honour of Elaine Turner and Martin Street
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Oliver Hampe (Museum
für Naturkunde Berlin) for tracing the Nehring collection in
the museum archives in Berlin. We also thank Dr. Michael
Buchwitz (Museum für Naturkunde Magdeburg) for pro-
viding us with the picture of the 3D model on display at
the Museum für Naturkunde Magdeburg (Germany).
This paper is dedicated to Elaine Turner and Martin Street
(RGZM, MONREPOS, Neuwied) to acknowledge their im-
portant contribution to the study of Quaternary mammals
in Central Europe as well as in northern Africa and to
honour their retirement.
REFERENCES
Dusseldorp, G.L., 2009. A View to a Kill: Investigating Middle
Palaeolithic Subsistence Using an Optimal Foraging Perspective.
Sidestone Press, Leiden.
Gröning, E., Brauckmann, C., 2011. Der Paläo-Zoo, Teil 3: Die
Seweckenberge bei Quedlinburg – Typ-Lokalität für ein fossi les
Fabelwesen. Mitteilungsblatt des Zoovereins und des Zoos
Schwerin 17, 63-67.
Guerin, C., 1980. Les rhinoceros (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) du
Miocene terminal au Pleistocene superieur en Europe occiden-
tale; comparaison avec les especes actuelles. Documents du
Laboratoire de Geologie de la Faculte des Sciences de Lyon 79,
3-1183.
Hillman-Smith, A.K.H., Owen-Smith, N., Anderson, J.L., Hall-Martin,
A.J., Selaldi, J.P., 1986. Age estimation of the White rhino ceros
(Ceratotherium simum). Journal of Zoology London 210, 355-
379.
Kahlke, H.-D., 1975. Der Saigafund von Bottrop / Westfalen.
Quartär 7, 135-146.
Kahlke, R.-D., Lacombat, F., 2008. The earliest immigration of woolly
rhinoceros (Coelodonta tologoijensis, Rhinocerotidae, Mammalia)
into Europe and its adaptive evolution in Palaearctic cold stage
mammal faunas. Quaternary Science Reviews 27, 1951-1961.
Kosintsev, P., Mitchell, K.J., Devièse, T., van der Plicht, J., Kuitems,
M., Petrova, E., Tikhonov, A., Higham, T., Comeskey, D., Turney,
C., Cooper, A., van Kolfschoten, T., Stuart, A.J., Lister, A.M.,
2019. Evolution and extinction of the giant rhinoceros Elas mo-
therium sibiricum sheds light on late Quaternary megafaunal ex-
tinction. Nature Ecology and Evolution 3, 31-38.
Kuitems, M., van der Plicht, J., van Kolfschoten, T., 2019. Elasmo-
therium sibiricum: de uitgestorven Siberische eenhoorn – uit-
komsten van opzienbarend onderzoek. Cranium 36, 34-43.
Lacombat, F., 2006. Morphological and biometrical differentiation
from Pleistocene species of Stephanorhinus (Mammalia, Perisso-
dactyla, Rhinocerotidae) in Mediterranean Europe and the Massif
Central, France. Palaeontographica A 274, 71-111.
Leibniz, G.W., 1749. Protogea. – Deutsche Fassung aus dem Nach-
lass herausgegeben von Scheid, Chr. L.; Göttingen (Johann Wil-
helm Schmid). (after: Puhle, 2002).
Ludwig, W., 2012. Carl Andreas Bischof: Hüttenmeister an der
Herzoglichen Eisenhütte Mägdesprung von 1844 bis 1863;
Mitbegründer des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI) 1856 in
Alexis bad; Begründer der Anhaltischen Geologischen Landes-
sammlung 1864 in Dessau. Mägdesprunger Hefte 5. Eisenhüt-
tenverein Mägdesprung Carl Bischof e. V., Harzgerode.
Markova, A.K, van Kolfschoten, T. (Eds.), 2008. Evolution of the
European ecosystems during the Pleistocene-Holocene transition
(24-8 Kyr BP). KMK Scientic Press, Moscow.
Markova, A.K., Puzachenko, A.Y., van Kolfschoten, T., van der
Plicht, J., Ponomarev, D.V., 2013. New data on changes in the
European distribution of the mammoth and the woolly rhino-
ceros during the second half of the Late Pleistocene and the early
Holocene. Quaternary International 292, 4-14.
Markova, A.K, van Kolfschoten, T., Puzachenko, A.Y. (Eds.),
2019. Evolution of the European ecosystems during the
Pleistocene-Holo cene transition (24-8 Kyr BP). GEOS Press,
Moscow.
Nehring, A., 1904. Diluviale Wirbeltier-Reste aus einer Schlote (sic?)
des Seveckenberges bei Quedlinburg. Zeitschrift der Deutschen
Geologischen Gesellschaft 56, 290-303.
Oekentorp, K., 1994. Fossilien in Mythos und Volksglauben:
Einhorn und Mammut. Natur- und Landschaftskunde 30, 60-
66.
Puhle, M. (Ed.), 2002. Die Welt im leeren Raum. Otto von Guericke
(1602-1686). Deutscher Kunstverlag, München–Berlin.
Shpansky, A.V., 2014. Juvenile remains of the “woolly rhinoceros”
Coelodonta antiquitatis (Blumenbach 1799) (Mammalia, Rhino-
cerotidae) from the Tomsk Priob’e area (southeast Western Sibe-
ria). Quaternary International 333, 86-99.
Stuart, A.J., Lister, A.M., 2012. Extinction chronology of the woolly
rhinoceros Coelodonta antiquitatis in the context of late Qua-
ternary megafaunal extinctions in northern Eurasia. Quaternary
Science Reviews 51, 1-17.
Valentini, M.B., 1714. Museum Museorum, Schaubühne oder Natur-
und Materialienkammer. Frankfurt am Main.
van Kolfschoten, T., Li, Z., Wang, H., Doyon, L., 2020. The Middle
Palaeolithic site Lingjing (Xuchang, Henan, China): preliminary
new results. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 50, 21-28.
von Koenigswald, W., 1985. Die Kleinsäuger aus der Allac taga-
Fauna von der Villa Seckendorff in Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt aus
dem frühen letzten Glazial. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde
(B)110, 1-40.
Wüst, E., 1906. Literatur-Bericht zur Landes- und Volkskunde der
Provinz Sachsen nebst angrenzenden Landesteilen. Mitteilungen
des Vereins für Erdkunde Halle A / S 1906, 81-82.
48 T. van Kolfschoten · A. Hesse · The Woolly Rhinoceros from Seweckenberge near Quedlinburg
Thijs van Kolfschoten
Universiteit Leiden
Faculteit der Archeologie
P.O. Box 9514
NL - 2300 RA Leiden
and
Shandong University
Institute of Cultural Heritage
72 Binhai Highway
CN - Qingdao,266237
t.van.kolfschoten@arch.leidenuniv.nl
Angelika Hesse
Museum für Naturkunde und Vorgeschichte Dessau
Askanische Str. 32
D - 06842 Dessau-Roßlau
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Lingjing is an open-air archaic hominin site in northern China where, apart from two incomplete human skulls, thousands of lithic artefacts as well as abundant, well-preserved mammalian remains with OSL ages ranging between ≈105 ka and ≈125 ka. It has been excavated yearly since 2005. The mammalian faunal assemblage from the site is very diverse with 22 different taxa. Equids and a large bovid Bos primigenius dominate the fauna; the mortality profiles of these herbivores indicate hominin/human hunting. Detailed taphonomic analyses demonstrate that Lingjing is a kill-butchery site and not a base camp. The Lingjing fauna and bone tool record shows remarkable similarities with the archaeological record from the Lower Paleolithic site of Schöningen 13 II-4, Germany, i.e., the Schöningen Spear Horizon, which is ca. 200 ka older than the Lingjing site. Both sites yielded well-preserved material, a very diverse fauna and a large amount of bone tools with identical features.
Book
Full-text available
This book provides detailed reconstructions of mammal assemblages, vegetation ommunities and ecosystems of Europe during the Pleistocene-Holocene transition. The reconstructions are based on palaeobiological data, united in databases and with help of mathematic methods. Reconstructions are made for the fi ve most successful time intervals. The text is illustrated by numerous maps of mammal and plant ranges, mammal assemblages, plant communities and European ecosystems. The publication is intended for geographers, iologists, and palaeontologists.
Article
Full-text available
Understanding extinction events requires an unbiased record of the chronology and ecology of victims and survivors. The rhinoceros Elasmotherium sibiricum, known as the ‘Siberian unicorn’, was believed to have gone extinct around 200,000 years ago—well before the late Quaternary megafaunal extinction event. However, no absolute dating, genetic analysis or quantitative ecological assessment of this species has been undertaken. Here, we show, by accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon dating of 23 individuals, including cross-validation by compound-specific analysis, that E. sibiricum survived in Eastern Europe and Central Asia until at least 39,000 years ago, corroborating a wave of megafaunal turnover before the Last Glacial Maximum in Eurasia, in addition to the better-known late-glacial event. Stable isotope data indicate a dry steppe niche for E. sibiricum and, together with morphology, a highly specialized diet that probably contributed to its extinction. We further demonstrate, with DNA sequencing data, a very deep phylogenetic split between the subfamilies Elasmotheriinae and Rhinocerotinae that includes all the living rhinoceroses, settling a debate based on fossil evidence and confirming that the two lineages had diverged by the Eocene. As the last surviving member of the Elasmotheriinae, the demise of the ‘Siberian unicorn’ marked the extinction of this subfamily. © 2018, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Article
Full-text available
This work presents a paleontological study of fossil rhinoceros of the genus Stephanorhinus in Mediterranean Europe and in the Massif Central, France, based on the study of material from nineteen sites of Pleistocene age. Although Stephanorhinus etruscus, Stephanorhinus hundsheimensis, Stephanorhinus hemitoechus, and Stephanorhinus kirchbergensis have similar tooth morphology, distinctive characters were found by quantifying the qualitative observations. Biometrical data show specific differences according to the results of the morphological description and a precise diagnose of each tooth is proposed for the four species.
Article
Full-text available
In the recent decades a considerable volume of the Late Pleistocene mammal bones has been dated by radiocarbon in Europe. The data thus obtained helped to elucidate distinguishing features of range dynamics for mammoth and wooly rhinoceros - large herbivores typical of the "mammoth fauna"; the changes in their range have been traced through the oxygen isotope stages 3 and 2 (-44 to 10 kyr BP). A series of new radiocarbon dates obtained for a number of localities in Eastern Europe and Asia as a part of projects supported by the grants of the Netherlands Organization on Scientific Research (NWO), RFBR. RFBR grant and also the Program of Russian Academy of Sciences No 12 gave an insight into dynamics of the mammals' ranges during climatically different stages of the Late Pleistocene (interstadials and stadials of the last glacial epoch).
Article
Full-text available
Megafaunal extinctions in northern Eurasia (excluding Mediterranean islands) since the Last Interglacial claimed about 37% of species with body weights >44 kg. Here we review the dating evidence for the timings of these extinctions, which were staggered over tens of millennia. Moreover, individual species disappeared at different times in different geographical areas. For example, cave bear probably disappeared ca. 30.5–28.5 ka, at approximately the onset of GS-3 (beginning of ‘LGM’), whereas cave lion survived until the Lateglacial ca 14 ka. Others survived into the Holocene: woolly mammoth until ca 10.7 ka in the New Siberian Islands and ca 4 ka on Wrangel Island, giant deer to at least 7.7 ka in western Siberia and European Russia. It is evident that climatic and vegetational changes had major impacts on species' ranges, and moreover the contrasting chronologies and geographical range contractions are consistent with environmental drivers relating to their differing ecologies. However, the possible role of humans in this process has still to be satisfactorily explored.
Article
Full-text available
The cold adapted larger mammal faunas of Pleistocene Eurasia (the so-called Mammuthus–Coelodonta faunas) were mainly composed of autochthonous Palaearctic elements. Whereas the history of the immigration and evolution of European woolly mammoths has been exhaustively studied, comparable investigations for woolly rhinoceroses are lacking. Referring to the remains of European and Asian Coelodonta in general and the first skull to be found of a European woolly rhinoceros of early Middle Pleistocene age (from Bad Frankenhausen, Germany) in particular, the occurrence, dispersal, morphological evolution and ecological adaptation of early Coelodonta are reviewed.
Book
Full-text available
The sophistication of Neanderthal behavioural strategies have been the subject of debate from the moment of their recognition as a separate species of hominin in 1856. This book presents a study on Neanderthal foraging prowess. Novel ethnographic and primatological insights, suggest that increasing dependence on high quality foods, such as meat, caused the brain to evolve to a large size and thus led to highly intelligent hominins. From this baseline, the author studies the Neanderthal archaeological record in order to gain insight into the knowledge-intensity of Neanderthal hunting behaviour. In this research, an optimal foraging perspective is applied to Pleistocene bone assemblages. According to this perspective, foraging success is an important factor in an individuals evolutionary fitness. Therefore foraging is organised as efficiently as possible. The prey species that were selected and hunted by Neanderthals are analysed. The author investigates economic considerations that influenced Neanderthal prey choice. These considerations are based on estimates of the population densities of the available prey species and on estimates of the relative difficulty of hunting those species. The results demonstrate that when Neanderthals operated within poor environments, their prey choice was constrained: they were not able to hunt species living in large herds. In these environments, solitary species were the preferred prey. It is striking that Neanderthals successfully focussed on the largest and most dangerous species in poor environments. However, in richer environments, these constraints were lifted and species living in herds were successfully exploited. In order to assess the accuracy of this approach, bone assemblages formed by cave hyenas are also analysed. The combined results of the Neanderthal and hyena analyses show that an optimal foraging perspective provides a powerful tool to increase our understanding of Pleistocene ecology. The niches of two social carnivores of similar size, which were seemingly similar, are successfully distinguished. This result lends extra credence to the conclusions regarding Neanderthal foraging strategies. This book contributes to the debate surrounding Neanderthal competence and ability. It combines an up-to-date review of current knowledge on Neanderthal biology and archaeology, with novel approaches to the archaeological record.
Article
Ontogenetic studies based on fossil mammals are rather scarce, including for the “woolly rhinoceros” Coelodonta antiquitatis (Blumenbach 1799). In this paper, for the first time, the earliest age stages (from 6 months to 3.5 years) of C. antiquitatis have been studied on the basis of several lower jaw fragments and limb bones from two Late Pleistocene sites along the Ob' (at Krasny Yar and near Kargasok) in the Tomsk Priob'e area (Tomsk region, southeast Western Siberia). As opposed to other mammalian species (e.g. mammoths), the absence of great concentrations of C. antiquitatis juvenile remains (possibly due to the palaeoecological features of this taxon) has to be emphasized. Finds of skulls, jaws, and isolated milk molars are very rare, particularly in those cases of individuals younger than three years. Therefore, the remains from Krasny Yar, belonging to individuals characterized by different ages, represent a unique case. A large series of osteological material on the mandibles with functioning milk teeth and forming permanent teeth, belonging to calves from 6 months to 3.5 years of age, is described. For the first time, a large series of C. antiquitatis tubular bones of different individual ages (from birth to adulthood) is described, and the order and age of epiphysis adhering is revealed. The proportions of tubular bones (ratio between epiphysis and diaphysis) remain the same in stages 3–5 of individual progress (over 3 years of age). An assumption about C. antiquitatis sizes in different ontogenetic stages and the rate of growth is made. The body size for one-month-old calves is approximately 72 cm in shoulder height and about 120 cm in length. Well-known ontogenetic studies concerning modern African rhinoceroses (Diceros bicornis L. 1756 and Ceratotherium simum simum [Burchell, 1817]) as well as other ontogenetic studies performed on C. antiquitatis juvenile dental material have also been taken into consideration in this paper.