No file available
To read the file of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Proposal to observe paths superpositions in a double-slit setup
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.
Abstract
The interference pattern produced by a quantum particle in Young's double-slit setup is attributed to the particle's wavefunction having gone through both slits. In the path integral formulation, this interference involves a superposition of paths, going through either slit, linking the source to the detection point. We show how these paths superpositions can in principle be observed by implementing a series of minimally-perturbing weak measurements between the slits and the detection plane. We further propose a simplified protocol in order to observe these "weak trajectories" with single photons.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
We introduce a new semirelativistic quantum operator for the length of the worldline a particle traces out as it moves. In this article the operator is constructed in a heuristic way and some of its elementary properties are explored. The operator ends up depending in a very complicated way on the potential of the system it is to act on so as a proof of concept we use it to analyze the expected distance traveled by a free Gaussian wave packet with some initial momentum. It is shown in this case that the distance such a particle travels becomes light-like as its mass vanishes and agrees with the classical result for macroscopic masses. This preliminary result has minor implications for the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) in quantum mechanics. In particular it shows that the logical relationship between two formulations of the WEP in classical mechanics extends to quantum mechanics. That our result is qualitatively consistent with the work of others emboldens us to start the task of evaluating the new operator in nonzero potentials. However, we readily acknowledge that the looseness in the definition of our operator means that all of our so-called results are highly speculative. Plans for future work with the new operator are discussed in the last section.
There has been a recent revival of interest in the notion of a 'trajectory' of a quantum particle. In this paper, we detail the relationship between Dirac's ideas, Feynman paths and the Bohm approach. The key to the relationship is the weak value of the momentum which Feynman calls a transition probability amplitude. With this identification we are able to conclude that a Bohm 'trajectory' is the average of an ensemble of actual individual stochastic Feynman paths. This implies that they can be interpreted as the mean momentum flow of a set of individual quantum processes and not the path of an individual particle. This enables us to give a clearer account of the experimental two-slit results of Kocsis et al.
We propose a scheme allowing us to observe the evolution of a quantum system in the semiclassical regime along the paths generated by the propagator. The scheme relies on performing consecutive weak measurements of the position. We show how "weak trajectories" can be extracted from the pointers of a series of devices having weakly interacted with the system. The properties of these weak trajectories are investigated and illustrated in the case of a time-dependent model system.
We have found that the usual measuring procedure for preselected and postselected ensembles of quantum systems gives unusual results. Under some natural conditions of weakness of the measurement, its result consistently defines a new kind of value for a quantum variable, which we call the weak value. A description of the measurement of the weak value of a component of a spin for an ensemble of preselected and postselected spin-(1/2 particles is presented.
- I M Duck
- P M Stevenson
- E C G Sudarshan
I. M. Duck, P. M. Stevenson, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. D, 40, 2112 (1989).
- A Tanaka
A. Tanaka, Phys. Lett. A 297, 307 (2002).
- T Mori
- I Tsutsui
T. Mori and I. Tsutsui, PTEP 2015, 043A01 (2015).
- A Matzkin
A. Matzkin Phys. Rev. Research 2, 032048(R) (2020).
- T Mori
- I Tsutsui
- Quantum Stud
T. Mori and I. Tsutsui, Quantum Stud.: Math. Found. 2, 371 (2015).
- L P Withers
- F A Narducci
L. P. Withers, Jr. and F. A. Narducci, J. Math. Phys. 56, 062106 (2015).
- D Georgiev
- E Cohen
D. Georgiev and E. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 97, 052102 (2018).
- Q Duprey
- A Matzkin
Q. Duprey and A. Matzkin, Phys. Rev. A 95, 032110 (2017);
- S Kocsis
S. Kocsis et al., Science 332 1170 (2011).
- D H Kobe
D. H. Kobe, Ann. Phys. 123, 381 (1979).
- M Beau
M. Beau, Eur. J. Phys. 33, 1023 (2012).
- M Beau
- T C Dorlas
M. Beau and T. C. Dorlas, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54, 1882 (2015).
- A Zecca
A. Zecca, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 911 (1999).
- H Yabuki
H. Yabuki, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 25, 159 (1986).
- A Sinha
- A H Vijay
- U Sinha
A. Sinha, A. H. Vijay and U. Sinha, Scientific Rep. 5, 10304 (2015).
- A Matzkin
A. Matzkin, Found. Phys. 49, 298 (2019).
- U Sinha
- C Couteau
- T Jennewein
- R Laflamme
- G Weihs
U. Sinha, C. Couteau,T. Jennewein, R. Laflamme and G. Weihs, Science 329, 418 (2010).
- C R Leavens
C. R. Leavens, Found. Phys. 35 469 (2005).
- A Matzkin
A. Matzkin, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48, 305301 (2015).
- L P Withers
- F A Narducci
L. P. Withers Jr and F. A. Narducci J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48 155304 (2015).
- H F Hofmann
- T Matsushita
- S Kuroki
- M Iinuma
H. F. Hofmann, T. Matsushita, S. Kuroki and M. Iinuma, arXiv:2111.03203 (2021).
- M Cormann
- M Remy
- B Kolaric
- Y Caudano
M. Cormann, M. Remy, B. Kolaric and Y. Caudano, Phys. Rev. A 93, 042124 (2016).