Content uploaded by Guy Hatchard
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Guy Hatchard on Dec 19, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Health and Environmental Research
2017; 3(3-1): 16-31
http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/jher
doi: 10.11648/j.jher.s.2017030301.12
ISSN: 2472-3584 (Print); ISSN: 2472-3592 (Online)
The Effect of Coherent Collective Consciousness on
National Quality of Life and Economic Performance
Indicators—An Analysis of the IMD Index of National
Competitive Advantage
Guy Hatchard
1
, Kenneth Cavanaugh
2
1
Safe, Healthy, Natural, Helena Bay, New Zealand, Management, Department of Management, Maharishi University of Management,
Fairfield, Iowa, USA
2
Institute of Science, Technology, and Public Policy, Applied Statistics, Department of Management, College of Business and Public
Administration, Maharishi University of Management, Fairfield, Iowa, USA
Email address:
ghatchard@gmail.com (G. Hatchard)
To ci te t hi s arti cl e:
Guy Hatchard, Kenneth Cavanaugh. The Effect of Coherent Collective Consciousness on National Quality of Life and Economic
Performance Indicators—An Analysis of the IMD Index of National Competitive Advantage. Journal of Health and Environmental
Research. Special Issue: Maharishi Vedic Science: Creating a Sustainable Future. Vol. 3, No. 3-1, 2017, pp. 16-31.
doi: 10.11648/j.jher.s.2017030301.12
Received: January 13, 2017; Accepted: February 16, 2017; Published: March 20, 2017
Abstract:
The scores of New Zealand and Norway on the IMD Index of National Competitive Advantage increased
significantly when they passed the predicted coherence group threshold in 1993 (1% of a population practicing the
Transcendental Meditation program or the √1% practicing the advanced TM-Sidhi program in a group) when compared to 44
other developed nations as shown by cross-country panel regression analysis robust to serially correlated errors,
heteroskedasticity, and contemporaneous correlation of residuals (p < 0.000000000000003). Subsidiary analysis and
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) data confirmed that the changes were unusually broad-
based (p <.000000065), sustained, and balanced in nature with five years of high growth, low unemployment, and low
inflation. Taken as a whole, the findings suggest a prescription for balanced and sustained growth based on a method to
enhance quality of life and innovation among the population.
Keywords:
IMD Index, Norway, New Zealand, Maharishi Effect, National Competitive Advantage, Quality of Life
1. Introduction
The burning question facing governments and voters today
is: What policies and programs will guarantee prosperity for
all and who will deliver it? Yet it is not only government
economic policy that influences economic outcomes; less
tangible human factors [45], referred to by terms such as
confidence, innovation, creativity, mobility, insight,
opportunity, and vibrancy, play an essential role in economic
success. Can a method be adopted to directly influence these
more abstract determinants of economic success which
interface directly with individual and social consciousness?
This paper sheds light on this question by analyzing the
Institute for Management Development (IMD) broad-based
international measure of economic performance and quality
of life. The IMD Index published yearly [29] amalgamates
data from over 200 sources.
Drawing on physical field theory, we use a ‘field effect’
model of consciousness [22, 12, 13, 25, chap. 4], whose
effects are characterized by a phase transition from disorder
to order in society. Phase transitions in the physical sciences
are understood as sudden decreases in entropy or disorder
when a critical threshold is passed accompanied by the
emergence of new system properties. The model for such a
transformation is that of a step function—rapid, broad-based
inception of more orderly properties and functions of the
system.
The phase transition effect we studied is known as the
Journal of Health and Environmental Research 2017; 3(3-1): 16-31 17
Maharishi Effect, named after Maharishi Mahesh Yogi who
predicted it more than 40 years ago [33]. Over the last 35
years, 47 scientific research findings [36] have indicated
strong empirical support for the Maharishi Effect which
predicts increased positive trends and reduced problems in
society when the critical threshold of one per cent of a
population practicing the Transcendental Meditation
SM
program
1
or the square root of one per cent of a population
practicing the advanced Transcendental Meditation
®
and
TM-Sidhi
®
program in a group morning and evening [34] is
passed.
The Transcendental Meditation program is an easy-to-
learn, mental technique practiced 15 to 20 minutes twice a
day, which has become popular as a method to improve
health, increase creativity, optimize brain functioning, and
reduce stress; over six million individuals have learned the
technique worldwide. Over 700 research studies have
validated effects for the individual such as faster reaction
times, increased creativity and IQ, and improved self
actualisation, and general health when the technique is
practiced regularly [36]. According to Maharishi [35, p. 308],
the TM-Sidhi program is an advanced aspect of the
Transcendental Meditation program; it teaches the individual
to think and act from the level of self-referral consciousness,
enhancing coordination between mind and body while
increasing coherent EEG patterns in the brain [46].
1.1. The Maharishi Effect: Previous Research on Crime
and Conflict
In 1993, A prospective test of the Maharishi Effect [23]
was undertaken when 4,000 advanced Transcendental
Meditation participants gathered in Washington, D. C. for a
six-week demonstration project. Predictions of reduced
violent crime, improved approval ratings for government,
and reduced need for emergency services were lodged in
advance with a 27-member independent review panel and
advertised in the Washington Post [23], [19]. There was a
24% reduction in violent crime compared to the trend
predicted by time-series analysis of preceding data (p <
0.000000002), approval ratings for President Clinton
increased (p < 0.00000006), accidents, emergency
psychiatric calls, and hospital trauma cases decreased, and a
quality of life index improved (p < 0.00004).
Over 30 studies have shown reduced crime and violence
through the Maharishi Effect since 1974 [36]. For example,
Hatchard et al. [24] found reduced crime in Metropolitan
Merseyside, UK. Time series analysis of monthly data showed
total crime fell 13.4% in March 1988 (p < 0.00006) when a
permanent Transcendental Meditation group was formed.
Using time series analysis Orme-Johnson et al. [41, 42]
analyzed the effect on world events of three large
1
© 1999 Maharishi University of Management. ® Transcendental Meditation,
TM-Sidhi, Consciousness-Based, Maharishi, Maharishi Vedic Approach to
Health, Maharishi University of Management, and Maharishi Vedic Science are
registered or common law trademarks licensed to Maharishi Education
Development Corporation and used under sublicense or with permission.
Transcendental Meditation assemblies. They found
reductions in terrorism (72%) and international conflict
(33%) as well as increased world stock.
1.2. USA—Economic and Social Research on the
Maharishi Effect
Stock market data can be interpreted as a measure of
public confidence and optimism. Cavanaugh, Orme-Johnson
et al [6] used regression analysis and Box-Jenkins time series
analysis respectively and found a simultaneous rise in the
world’s major stock markets during an assembly of 8000 (the
square root of one per cent of the world’s population) held at
Maharishi University of Management, Iowa in December
1983 (p < 0.00004).
Orme-Johnson and Gelderloos [39] measured the impact
of participation in the Transcendental Meditation technique
in the USA on a quality of life index. A reversal in the long-
term decline in US quality of life occurred as large numbers
of the USA population started the Transcendental Meditation
program and accelerated when the Maharishi Effect threshold
was exceeded (p < 0.0001). The economic portion of the
index reported GNP per capita as rising 2.3% in 1983
marking the end of the recession, and a sharp decline in
unemployment commencing in 1983.
In a series of studies covering 1979 to 1987 using Box-
Jenkins time series analysis and multiple-input transfer
function analysis, Cavanaugh et al. [7-10] found highly
statistically significant reductions in the monthly “Misery
Index” (the sum of inflation and unemployment rates) in both
USA and Canada when the coherence creating group at
Maharishi University of Management exceeded the square
root of one per cent of the population threshold (p <
0.00000001).
2. Data
The preceding case studies and previous research findings
indicate a need to rigorously assess and quantify the impact
of the Maharishi Effect on broad-based measures of national
economic performance. The opportunity to investigate this
was provided by the two developed countries enjoying the
world’s highest levels of participation in the Transcendental
Meditation program both of which passed the Maharishi
Effect threshold during 1993.
2.1. Coherence Data
Cumulative numbers of individuals instructed in the
Transcendental Meditation technique in New Zealand were
obtained. By the end of 1993, there were 35,593 persons
instructed in the Transcendental Meditation technique. The
population of New Zealand at the end of 1993 was
3,525,000.
Among the 46 countries covered by IMD data, the only
other country to have reached the target of one per cent
instructed in the Transcendental Meditation program during
the period covered by the IMD rankings (1992 to 1998) was
18 Guy Hatchard and Kenneth Cavanaugh: The Effect of Coherent Collective Consciousness on National Quality of Life and
Economic Performance Indicators—An Analysis of the IMD Index of National Competitive Advantage
Norway. The baseline number instructed in Transcendental
Meditation in Norway at 1st January 1988 was recorded as
37,000 to 38,000 with the extended range accounted for by a
small recording error. Subsequently 2,925 new individuals
participated in the Transcendental Meditation program before
the end of 1993. There were also over 400 advanced TM-
Sidhi practitioners some of whom practiced in groups
generating sufficient additional coherence to pass the
Maharishi Effect threshold. The population of Norway was
4,287,000 in 1992.
2.2. Economic History
New Zealand is a small, developed country whose
economy has depended on exports of primary products,
particularly meat, wool, forestry, and dairy products, to pay
for needed imports. Its economy gradually declined between
1950 and 1990, with attendant relative falls in standard of
living as compared to its major trading partners. Repeated
interventions of successive governments to correct the
imbalances in the persistently sluggish economy had failed to
produce a sustainable model of economic success. But by
1994, it was apparent that an unexpected vibrancy had taken
hold of the whole economy and the national mood.
Norway has an oil-rich economy, but despite the attendant
wealth, the economy underperformed in the 1980s. Low
domestic demand became linked with rising unemployment
and a high rate of corporate failure which affected bank
solvency. By 1994, it was clear that domestic demand had
unexpectedly begun to increase ushering in an extended
period of growth.
This was reflected in large increases in the IMD scores of
competitive advantage for Norway and New Zealand which
encompassed broad measures of economic performance and
quality of life (see Table 1).
2.3. Measures of Economic Well Being of Nations
Michael Porter’s analysis of “The Competitive Advantage
of Nations” [44] has been adapted and augmented in
econometric approaches to measuring the economic
wellbeing of nations. The IMD Index contained in the IMD
Worl d Co mpet it iv en ess Ye ar bo ok [2 9] i s used i n th is study. It
is a measure and database of the relative national economic
health of industrially developed nations that has drawn upon
Porter’s ideas, but its broad base ensures that it is
independent of any particular theory. Madeleine Linard de
Guertechin defines the IMD Index in the 1997 Yearbook as a
multi-dimensional approach “to capture in a single index the
capacity of a country’s economic structure to promote
growth” (29, introduction) The IMD Index is used to test
whether the economy of both New Zealand and Norway
showed a significant and broad-based improvement in IMD
scores relative to other developed nations at the time when
they surpassed the 1% threshold of individuals instructed in
the Transcendental Meditation program in 1993. The main
conclusions of the analysis are also checked against the
conclusions of the independently compiled OECD Economic
Surveys [38].
2.4. Sources
The IMD Yearbook has been published annually since
1987 by the International Institute for Management
Development in Switzerland. It contains a database of
economic and social measures from industrially developed
nations, which in 1996 comprised 224 data inputs for each of
46 nations. The 224 data points data are combined through
addition of z scores into 41 sub-scales which are in turn
grouped into 8 categories
2
and finally combined into one
overall competitiveness performance index yielding an
annual ranking of the 46 countries. The Index has been
compiled from 1992 to 1998 using a consistent methodology.
The data sources are made up of 35.5% that are per capita
statistics unrelated to country size such as interest rates or
international credit ratings, 10.7% absolute values that are
positively affected by the size of the country, 11.6% growth
rates, 33.3% executive surveys, and 8.9% background
information. The IMD Yearbooks rank the 46 countries on
each set of the 224 raw data inputs (excluding the
background statistics). Each data set is then converted into z
scores through the standard procedure.
Two-t hirds o f the d ata sourc es i nvolv e ha rd o r meas ured
facts drawn from a wide variety of international and national
sources. Data sources are referenced, missing values (2.9%)
are handled efficiently, and data issues of reliability and
comparability are discussed in footnotes and appendices. The
remaining one-third of the data series are derived from up-to-
date surveys of senior executives from the 46 countries. A
similar procedure has been used in every other year.
The IMD Yearbooks report raw values for the data inputs,
but all compiled sub-scales and categories are quoted solely
as rankings of nations. The country with the best
performance being ranked number 1 and so on. To avoid this
dilution of data, the authors obtained the series of compiled z
scores for the overall Index from IMD (See Table 1) and used
it in the main analysis. The effects of minor recorded data
irregularities are discussed and their correction estimated in
the subsidiary analysis,
3. Primary Analysis
The dependent variable is the IMD Index data (Table 1),
which is a repeated measure where each of 46 countries is
observed at seven yearly intervals in order to calculate a
numerical value for overall international competitiveness.
Since the overall IMD Index score is constructed from the
2
These eight categories are defined as: Domestic Economy—macroeconomic
evaluation of the domestic economy; Internationalization—participation in
international trade and investment flows; Government— extent to which
government policies are conducive to competition; Finance—performance of
capital markets and quality of financial services; Management—enterprise
management in an innovative, profitable, and responsible manner;
Infrastructure—extent to which resources & systems are adequate to meet the
needs of business; Science and Technology—capacity and success of basic and
applied research; and People—availability and qualifications of human resources.
Journal of Health and Environmental Research 2017; 3(3-1): 16-31 19
addition of z scores, the mean of each year is necessarily
zero. Although the scores can in theory take any value, in
practice, no country moved outside limits of ±200. The
standard deviation of the IMD Index scores increased
between 1992, when it was 63, to 72 in 1998.
Maharishi Effect theory predicts a phase transition in
economic performance as the 1% threshold is passed. Visual
inspection of Table 1 shows that both New Zealand and
Norway increased their IMD scores by approximately 25
when the Maharishi Effect threshold was surpassed during
1993. To assess the statistical significance of this improved
performance, the main analysis should analyze the behavior
of the panel of data as a whole. Importantly, it should ensure
that any statistical threats to inference such as serial
correlation or heteroskedasticity of the residuals are
diagnosed and properly handled. The increase in standard
deviation between cross-sections suggests that cross-
sectional heteroskedasticity should be checked.
Vis ual i nspec tio n o f Tabl e 1 i ndi cates so me vola tility in
individual country scores from year to year which suggests
that heteroskedasticity should also be investigated in a group-
wise sense. This volatility should also be visually examined
and investigated on a case-by-case basis. Above all, the
model should be both a good fit and demonstrably robust.
Figure 1. IMD Scores For New Zealand and Norway 1992 to 1997.
Tab le 1. IMD Index of Nati onal E conomi c Well Being.
Overall Scores 1992 - 1998* (compiled z scores)
Country 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
ARGENTINA -51.21 -27.26 -50.35 -34.55 -42.30 -33.69 -30.95
AUSTRALIA 41.85 31.54 29.64 39.88 39.39 22.28 21.36
AUSTRIA 9.17 28.12 40.38 46.05 48.47 40.68 40.15
BELGIUM 8.14 15.65 36.66 30.27 37.10 41.31 37.48
BRAZIL -65.33 -52.90 -67.45 -65.83 -91.66 -97.27 -92.36
CANADA 66.25 64.43 59.22 41.77 25.31 29.31 31.41
CHILE -1.52 8.03 48.20 31.16 14.04 27.30 24.93
CHINA 1.71 -21.02 -15.28 -36.27 -47.41 -54.15 -57.60
COLOMBIA -102.68 -101.78 -53.43 -51.03 -49.13 -39.31 -39.22
CZECH REPUBLIC -66.77 -54.81 -53.47 -70.81 -68.60 -55.01 -58.44
DENMARK 69.49 67.99 69.43 64.52 72.26 75.38 72.15
FINLAND 78.34 75.35 44.15 36.58 26.27 5.59 16.28
FRANCE 17.69 30.75 30.23 36.18 45.60 34.86 32.17
GERMANY 45.50 52.57 62.25 70.31 80.07 82.59 83.47
GREECE -63.05 -59.71 -75.12 -78.65 -69.22 -68.46 -65.91
HONG KONG 89.65 89.02 86.64 93.55 95.00 95.27 90.69
HUNGARY -30.57 -56.31 -71.88 -86.27 -77.25 -60.48 -60.36
ICELAND 27.54 19.39 18.38 8.68 10.14 11.16 9.33
INDIA -82.64 -93.23 -69.27 -61.14 -66.95 -76.61 76.35
INDONESIA -75.05 -75.20 -75.78 -54.46 -56.00 -59.70 -57.97
IRELAND 62.87 48.40 28.53 21.02 22.72 14.41 13.21
ISRAEL -0.56 -6.38 19.91 12.14 14.64 18.49 14.39
ITALY -40.31 -54.24 -32.90 -32.99 -31.72 -28.46 -27.33
JAPAN 35.31 67.83 81.29 90.14 104.43 118 .35 111.59
KOREA -62.47 -33.40 -21.22 -6.07 -41.18 -30.35 -32.51
LUXEMBOURG 68.29 59.57 62.80 39.61 42.26 47.43 46.95
MALAYSIA 18.08 32.54 23.36 16.88 32.11 37.72 33.52
MEXICO -62.27 -76.57 -82.18 -88.50 -38.17 -46.10 -46.99
NETHERLANDS 83.62 73.49 63.15 63.20 58.46 58.03 59.65
NEW ZEALAND 47.56 58.73 60.53 62.27 51.84 27.95 28.15
NORWAY 72.73 74.66 68.17 52.42 46.44 19.97 15.90
PHILIPPINES -54.33 -40.84 -41.80 -59.77 -59.56 -53.13 -44.58
POLAND -105.54 -108.77 -86.97 -107.37 -114.90 -110.90 -112.32
PORTUGAL -36.83 -52.62 -60.20 -42.62 -38.51 -42.77 -39.20
RUSSIA -133.41 -160.64 -179.28 -182.09 -179.59 -156.91 -140.44
SINGAPORE 141.39 135.35 119.06 120.94 106.40 116. 97 113. 14
SOUTH AFRICA -100.84 -110.36 -100.18 -91.67 -84.84 -84.20 -80.67
SPAIN -10.34 -3.74 -35.12 -26.59 -27.47 -36.42 -37.30
SWEDEN 36.65 35.01 45.21 44.14 56.47 47.57 45.76
SWITZERLAND 69.70 71.74 62.76 81.42 83.25 73.03 71.01
TAI WAN 38.64 15.59 33.08 41.74 18.93 45.05 43.71
20 Guy Hatchard and Kenneth Cavanaugh: The Effect of Coherent Collective Consciousness on National Quality of Life and
Economic Performance Indicators—An Analysis of the IMD Index of National Competitive Advantage
Overall Scores 1992 - 1998* (compiled z scores)
Country 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
THAILAND -71.19 -32.61 -35.37 -13.96 -7.86 -15.86 -15.18
TURKEY -61.35 -61.01 -55.63 -54.52 -38.84 -52.20 -50.53
UNITED KINGDOM 52.93 62.64 31.37 41.23 43.06 30.58 33.29
USA 196.02 180.05 155.68 164.43 153.42 145.70 139.11
VENEZUELA -100.87 -115.68 -117.20 -105.34 -96.93 -64.97 -62.62
*Publication date is April of that year; scores compiled from the previous year's data.
New Zealand and Norway both surpassed the Maharishi
Effect Threshold during 1993. The target reporting date for
the 1994 IMD Index data is mid 1993. Therefore in accord
with previous practice, the independent variable or Maharishi
Effect Index was modeled as step function—zero for every
country except Norway and New Zealand in the years 1994,
1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998 when it was assigned the value
one. This follows established practice where the Maharishi
Effect is described as a phase transition phenomenon, which
can be understood and analyzed in the same way as
transitions in physical systems [24, 25]
3.1. Statistical Methods
Annual IMD index ratings for 46 countries formed a
longitudinal panel of data for the years 1992 through 1998.
The cross-country panel data were analyzed using dynamic
panel regression methods.
A "f ixed-e ffec t" p ane l r egr ess ion mo del for th e IM D index
was formulated and then estimated using a procedure for
cross-country data proposed by Beck and Katz [3] In this
fixed-effect model (FEM), the annual value of the IMD index
for each country was modeled as a linear function of three
terms: (1) a country-specific regression intercept (fixed
effect) that provided an estimate of the mean of the index for
each country; (2) a regression coefficient designed to
estimate a hypothesized shift in the mean of the index for
New Zealand and Norway due to the Maharishi Effect; and
(3) a random error or disturbance term
Beck and Katz [3]
Each of the resulting set of regression equations for the 46
countries had following simple form:
IMDit = Ωoi + Ω1 MEit + ∑it, i = 1, 2,..., G; t = 1, 2,..., T
(1)
In these equations IMDit is the IMD index for country i in
year t, G is the number of countries in the sample (46) and T is
the number of annual observations for each country (seven). The
coefficient ∧oi is a regression intercept or constant term that
differs across countries. The Maharishi Effect variable MEit is a
"step-function" binary variable that takes the value 1 for the
years 1994 through 1998 for New Zealand and Norway and is
equal to 0 for all other countries and time periods. The
parameter ∧1 is a regression coefficient that estimates the impact
of the Maharishi Effect on the mean of the index for Norway
and New Zealand. Finally, ∑it is a random error or regression
disturbance term with mean zero.
The parameters of the panel regression model were
estimated using a method suggested by Beck and Katz [3, 4]
The Beck and Katz approach allows for possibly differing
variance of regression errors across countries (“panel
heteroskedasticity”), contemporaneous correlation of errors
across countries, and possible serial correlation of residual
errors. The latter three properties of the regression errors are
common in the analysis of cross-country data [3] In the
presence of any of the above three properties of the
regression errors, ordinary least squares (OLS) regression
will not be optimal [3, 4] In this case the OLS estimates of
the regression parameters will be inefficient, although they
are unbiased and consistent [3]; [21, ch. 11]. More
importantly, in this case the estimated standard errors for the
regression coefficients will be incorrect (biased and
inconsistent) even in large samples, thus invalidating
standard tests of hypotheses (e.g., t-tests and F-tests) [21,
chap. 11-12]; [3, 4]. The method of Beck and Katz generates
correct standard errors for the purpose of hypothesis testing,
so-called “panel corrected standard errors” (PCSE).
3.2 The Beck-Katz Approach
The first step in the Beck-Katz approach was to estimate
the fixed-effect model (1) using OLS regression. If
diagnostic tests indicated the presence of significant first-
order serial correlation of the regression residuals, the Prais-
Winsten transformation of the data was used to eliminate the
observed serial correlation [32, p. 619]. The equation was
then re-estimated by OLS using the transformed data.
As recommended by Beck and Katz [3] on the basis of Monte
Carlo simulation experiments, the Prais-Winsten transformation
was based on a common estimated serial correlation coefficient,
rather than separate coefficients for each country. The resulting
regression estimates based on the transformed data are
equivalent to those produced by feasible generalized least
squares (FGLS) estimation of a regression model with a first-
order autoregressive (AR (1)) model for the errors [21, p. 546].
An advantage of the Prais-Winsten approach is that, in
contrast to the Cochran-Orcutt transformation, it does not
involve discarding the first data observation for each country,
leading to increased efficiency of the resulting OLS estimates
[21, pp. 546-547]. Since only 7 annual observations were
available for the IMD index for the 46 countries, retaining
the first observation was an important consideration. This
issue was particularly salient for tests of the Maharishi Effect
because only two annual values of the index were available
for the baseline period prior to the predicted onset of the
Maharishi Effect for New Zealand and Norway in 1993 (as
reflected in the IMD index data for 1994).
After removing the serial correlation of residuals in the
first step of the Beck-Katz procedure, the OLS estimates of
the regression slope parameters for the fixed-effect model (1)
Journal of Health and Environmental Research 2017; 3(3-1): 16-31 21
will be unbiased and consistent. However the estimated
standard errors for the parameter estimates will still be
incorrect (biased and inconsistent) if the regression errors
display either differing error variance across countries, cross-
country correlation of the errors, or both. Because the OLS
parameter estimates will be correct after any serial
correlation of the errors has been removed, Beck and Katz
propose basing hypothesis tests on the OLS parameter
estimates of the transformed data from step one using
corrected standard errors (PCSEs).
Beck and Katz [4] prove that the resulting PCSEs are
consistent. Simulation experiments [3, 4] indicate that in typical
cross-country studies the corrected standard errors will be
accurate even in the presence of contemporaneously correlated
(panel heteroskedastic) errors. Their simulations also suggest
that the efficiency loss of using the OLS parameter estimates
"would not be large in practical research situations" [4, p. 5].
In summary, the specification of the independent Maharishi
Effect variable as a step function enables the panel regression
model to provide an “impact assessment” of the Maharishi
Effect intervention on the mean level of the IMD Index for
Norway and New Zealand allowing for a common
autoregressive error structure as well as a contemporaneous
correlation of errors and differing error variance across
countries. With this approach, the analysis will answer the
question ‘Is a significant increase in competitiveness score
predicted by the increase in coherence, taking into account the
time-dependent, dynamic structure of the IMD panel of scores?’.
4. Results of Primary Analysis
The primary analysis employs panel regression analysis to
determine the significance of the increases in the level of the
IMD Index for the 1994-1998 as compared with the 1992-
1993 baseline period. The dependent variable for the analysis
was the annual value of the IMD index (compiled z scores)
for the full set of 46 countries ranked by the IMD over the
years 1992-1998. The sample included seven annual
observations for each of the 46 countries, giving a total of
322 observations. There were no missing data values. The
regression results for the primary panel data analysis of the
IMD index are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. Results were
calculated using LIMDEP 7.0 and EViews 3.1 for Windows.
Tab le 2 disp lays the init ial o rdina ry l east squa res (OLS)
regression parameter estimates for the fixed-effects model
(FEM) described in equation (1). As hypothesized, the sign
of the estimated impact of the Maharishi Effect on the IMD
index for New Zealand and Norway was positive. The
estimate of the Maharishi Effect parameter ∧1 indicated an
upward shift of 36.545 in the mean level of the IMD index
for the two countries, on average, for the years 1994 through
the end of the sample in 1998 (p = 0.000033, two tailed test).
As shown in Table 2, the overall F statistic for the
regression was statistically significant, indicating that the
parameter estimates for all explanatory variables in the
regression take together, including the estimated regression
intercepts for each country, were significantly different from
zero. The reported R-squared value for the regression implies
that the estimated model accounted for 96.1 percent of the
variation in the IMD index.
Diagnostic tests reported in Table 2 indicate violation of
important assumptions underlying the OLS regression
analysis. First, the Lagrange multiplier (LM) test for first-
order serial correlation of the regression residuals was
statistically significant, with an estimated serial correlation
coefficient of 0.388. The latter test is the Breusch-Godfrey
test for first-order serial correlation [18]; [21, p. 541].
Second, the LM test for differing variances for the regression
errors across countries was highly significant [21, pp. 594-
596], indicating violation of the OLS assumption of constant
variance of the regression disturbances. Third, inspection of
the (contemporaneous) correlation matrix of the regression
residuals indicated substantial cross-country correlation of
the errors, with a majority of the correlations varying from
0.5 to 0.9 in absolute value.
As described above, in the presence of any of these three
violations of the standard OLS error assumptions, the standard
errors for the estimated parameters will be incorrect (biased and
inconsistent), thus invalidating hypothesis tests for the estimated
parameters. Consequently, in order to perform valid hypothesis
tests the Beck-Katz procedure [3]; [21, chap. 15] was used to
correct the OLS standard errors reported in Table 2.
Tab le 2. Panel Regression Analysis of IMD Index, 1992-1998 Ordi nary Leas t Squ ares (OLS) Regr essio n Est imat es of Fixed Effects Model Dependent Variable:
IMD Index (Compiled Z Scores)
†.
Va ri ab l e Coefficient Standard Error T-Ratio P Va lue
Maharishi Effect 36.545 8.655 4.223 3.3 x 10
-5
Number of observations 322 Degrees of freedom 275
F-statistic F (46, 275) 145.48 (p = 0.000) R-squared 0.961
S. E. of regression 14.629 R-bar-squared 0.954
Sum of squared residuals 58852.80 S. D. of dependent variable 68.153
Lag-one seria l correla tion 0. 388 Mean of dependent variable 2.07 x 10
-12
Durbin-Watson statistic 1.119 Akaike information criterion 2684.85
Diagnostic Tests:
LM test for s erial correlation: LM test for p anel heterosceda sticity:
χ
2 (1) = 70.574 (p = 0.000)
χ
2 (45) = 146.7808 (p = 0.000)
Tes t of po ole d reg re ssi on vs . fi xed e ffe ct s: Jarque-Bera test for normality:
F (45, 275) = 144.913 (p = 0.000)
χ
2 (2) = 12.845 (p = 0.002)
† The data consisted of 7 annual observations on each of 46 countries, for a total sample size of 322. To conserve space, the 46 estimated country-specific
intercepts (fixed effects) are not shown. These intercepts were jointly statistically significant. Complete regression results are available from the authors.
22 Guy Hatchard and Kenneth Cavanaugh: The Effect of Coherent Collective Consciousness on National Quality of Life and
Economic Performance Indicators—An Analysis of the IMD Index of National Competitive Advantage
4.1. Correction for Violations of the OLS Error
Assumptions
In the Beck-Katz procedure, all regression variables for
the fixed-effects model were first transformed to eliminate
the serial correlation of residuals and then the model was re-
estimated by OLS. The resulting estimates are shown in the
top panel of Table 3. After adjusting parameter estimates for
residual serial correlation, panel-corrected standard errors
were calculated to provide estimated standard errors that are
robust to panel heteroskedasticity and contemporaneous
correlation of the residuals. The calculation of the PCSEs
provides corrected estimates of the OLS standard errors, but
does not alter the OLS parameter estimates that have been
adjusted for serial correlation. Nor does the adjustment
process for the standard errors change the summary and
diagnostic statistics for the regression. The resulting
corrected standard errors (PCSEs) are reported in the lower
panel of Table 3.
Tab le 3 . Corrected Panel Regression Analysis of IMD Index, 1992-1998 OLS Regression Estimates Corrected for Serial Correlation with Standard Errors
Robust to Panel Heteroskedasticity, and Cross-Country Correlat ion of Residuals. Depend ent Variable: IMD Index (Compiled Z Scores)
† .
OLS Estimates Corrected for Residual Serial Correlation:
Va ri ab l e Coefficient Standard Error T-Ratio P Val ue
Maharishi Effect 43.023 11.890 3.618 0.0004
OLS Estimates Corrected for Serial Correlation with Standard Errors Robust to Panel Heteroskedasticity and Cross-Country Residual Correlation:
Va ri ab l e† Coefficient Panel Corrected Standard Error T-Ratio P Value
Maharishi Effect 43.023 4.961 8.672 2.9 x 10
-15
Number of observations 322 Degrees of freedom 275
F-statistic F (46, 275)) 62.82 (p = 0.000) R-squared 0.913
S. E. of regression 14.469 R-bar-squared 0.899
Sum of squared residuals 57572.16 S. D. of dependent variable 45.430
Lag-one seria l correla tion 0.0 26 Mean of dependent variable -1.43 x 10
-12
Durbin-Watson statistic 2.052 Akaike information criterion 2677.76
Diagnostic Tests:
LM test for s erial correlation: Jarque-Bera test for normality:
χ
2 (1) = 0.244 (p = 0.622)
χ
2 (2) = 7.986 (p = 0.018)
Tes t of po ole d reg re ssi on vs . fi xed e ffe ct s: LM test for p anel heterosceda sticity:
F (46, 275) = 61.245 (p = 0.000)
χ
2 (45) = 84.702 (p = 0.0003)
Ramsey's RESET test for omitted variables: F (3, 272) = 1.678 (p = 0.172)
† Prior to OLS estimation, the dependent and independent variables were transformed using the Prais-Winsten transformation to remove first-order serial
correlation of residuals (r1 = 0.388). To conserve space, the 46 estimated country-specific intercepts (fixed effects) are not shown. These intercepts were
jointly significant. Complete regression results are available from the authors.
In the first step of the Beck-Katz procedure, the Prais-
Winsten transformation was separately applied to all variables
for each country. As recommended by Beck and Katz [3] the
transformation was based on single, common, estimated serial
correlation coefficient for all countries, rather than separate
coefficients for each country. The common estimated serial
correlation coefficient was 0.388 (Table 2). The OLS
parameter estimates that have been corrected for serial
correlation are equivalent to those from a regression model
with first-order autoregressive (AR (1)) errors that was
estimated using feasible generalized least squares.
After adjustment for serial correlation, the estimated
Maharishi Effect parameter indicated a significant upward
shift in the mean of the IMD index for Norway and New
Zealand of 43.023 units (refer to top panel of Table 3). The
latter parameter estimate is unbiased and consistent [3]; [21,
ch. 11], but its estimated standard error remains incorrect
(biased and inconsistent) because the LM test for panel
heteroskedasticity in (Table 3) indicates the presence of
significantly different error variances across countries.
Substantial remaining cross-country correlation of residuals
was also found, which also implies biased and inconsistent
OLS standard errors.
The non-significance of the LM test for serial correlation
(Table 3) indicates that the Prais-Winsten transformation was
successful in removing the serial correlation of the regression
residuals. The R-squared value for the regression was 0.913,
indicating that the regression accounted for 91.3 percent of
the variation in the index. Note that because the dependent
variables have been transformed, this R-squared value cannot
be validly compared to that reported in Table 2. The overall
F-statistic was significant, as was the F-test for the joint
significance of the country-specific intercept terms for the
fixed effect model. Ramsey's RESET test [18]; [31, p. 98, 80]
was not significant, indicating no evidence of omitted
explanatory variables or incorrect functional form of the
regression equation.
The lower panel of Table 3 reports the panel-corrected
standard error for the Maharishi Effect parameter. The PCSE
for the Maharishi Effect parameter reported in Table 3 is
robust to both panel heteroskedasticity and cross-country
correlation of the regression disturbances [4].
The PCSE for the estimated Maharishi Effect parameter is
substantially smaller than that resulting from adjustment for
Journal of Health and Environmental Research 2017; 3(3-1): 16-31 23
serial correlation alone (top panel of Table 3). This reduction
in the standard error results in a larger t-ratio for the
estimated Maharishi Effect parameter t (275) = 8.672, with
p-value 2.9 x 10
-15
. In addition to being statistically
significant, the latter estimate was also substantively
important, representing 61.7 percent of the standard
deviation of the untransformed IMD index (43.023/68.153).
Tab le 3 r eport s s evera l diag nos tic test s of mo del adequacy.
These tests include an F-test of the "pooled regression"
model versus the fixed-effects model [2, p. 12]; [21, p. 562].
The pooled regression model includes only a single common
intercept term, as contrasted with the FEM reported in Table
3, which incorporates a separate intercept for each country.
The F-test rejects the null hypothesis that the country-
specific intercepts are jointly equal to zero, thus indicating
that the pooled regression model is not a valid restriction on
the fixed-effects model.
A fu rth er i ssue r ega rdi ng t he int erp ret ation o f the
regression results in Tables 2 and 3 is the apparent non-
normality of the regression residuals. The Jarque-Bera test
[30] reported in both tables was statistically significant,
indicating rejection of the null hypothesis that the regression
residuals were drawn from a normal distribution. However,
the distribution of residuals was not grossly non-normal. The
histogram was bell-shaped, displaying mild negative
skewness (-0.280) and positive kurtosis (3.531), as compared
to the expected values of 0.0 and 3.0, respectively, for a
normal (Gaussian) distribution.
Even in the presence of grossly non-normal errors, under
fairly general conditions the OLS regression parameters
remain correct (unbiased and consistent) and are
approximately (asymptotically) normally distributed in large
samples [17, pp. 62-63]. This result also extends to the case
in which the errors are heteroskedastic and serially correlated
[21, pp. 458-460]. The usual hypothesis testing procedures,
such as t-tests and F-tests, also remain asymptotically valid
for large samples [17, pp. 62-63]. The significance of the test
for normality in this case appears to be due to the very large
sample size (322 observations) since the deviation from
normality appears to be slight. Thus it appears unlikely that
the observed mild departure from normality of residuals has
any important implication for the interpretation of the
empirical results shown in Table 3.
4.2. Conclusion of Primary Analysis
In sum, the estimated impact of the Maharishi Effect on
the mean level of the IMD index for New Zealand and
Norway remained substantial in size and highly significant
after correction for serially correlated errors, differing
variance of the regression residuals across countries (panel
heteroskedasticity), and cross-country correlation of the
errors. This significant estimated upward shift in the mean
IMD index lends support to the hypothesis of a sudden
improvement in the economies of New Zealand and Norway
triggered in 1993 when both countries reached the predicted
critical threshold of one percent of the national population
instructed in the TM technique.
To fu rther asse ss t he ap pro pri atene ss o f the Maha rishi
Effect phase transition model and to more fully understand
the character of the economic and social changes that
occurred in New Zealand and Norway with the onset of the
Maharishi Effect, the following three subsections (Correction
of Data Irregularities, Subsidiary Analysis, and Discussion)
examine the data sources and individual country
performances in detail. Also the nature of the improved
economic and social performance in New Zealand and
Norway is compared to those of other countries. The latter
discussion shows that for countries other than New Zealand
and Norway, most cases of sharp upward movement in the
IMD Index are the result of short-term volatility. In contrast,
the improved performance of New Zealand and Norway on
the IMD Index in 1994 is broad-based and then largely
sustained over the subsequent five-year period. From this
point of view, the large effect size and the high statistical
significance obtained in the panel regression analysis are not
surprising. Some alternative statistical approaches were used
in preliminary analysis of the panel data, all of which were
highly statistically significant indicating that the significant
results reported in Tables 2-3 are quite robust to the method
of analysis employed. To substantiate these results, the
Discussion section will investigate the logical basis for a
causal inference from the data.
5. Correction of Data Irregularities
The statistical results need to be discussed in the light of
any identified irregularities in the input data series that
contribute to the IMD Index.
5.1. Size
The IMD Index is calculated to favor countries with a
higher population since size is considered an aid to
competitive advantage. Twenty-four (10.7%) of the 224 IMD
data sources are directly related to the size of the country.
Some examples include Gross Domestic Product, Measures of
Tot al Inv est men t, Nu mber of C omp ute rs in Us e, Num ber of
Fortune 500 Companies, Size of Banks, etc. In effect, a larger
country has a greater potential to be ranked higher. This adds
significance to the relatively high IMD Index score of New
Zealand and Norway, which were ranked 11th and 6th by score
in 1996, but only 43rd and 41st on population size.
The IMD scores can be recalculated by excluding absolute
values (the excluded data is still represented in the resulting
scale since IMD uses both absolute values and per capita
values). An adjusted Index can be calculated by subtracting
the z scores for the 24 affected data points from the overall
IMD Index scores reported in Table 1.
5.2. Timing
The target timing of reported data lags by one year behind
the publication date of the IMD Yearbook, which comes out
in May of the quoted year. Thus the average reporting date
for 1994 rankings is mid 1993. Data for New Zealand lagged
24 Guy Hatchard and Kenneth Cavanaugh: The Effect of Coherent Collective Consciousness on National Quality of Life and
Economic Performance Indicators—An Analysis of the IMD Index of National Competitive Advantage
an average of 0.3 years behind the overall target date. This
lag was not evenly distributed. By inspection it was
determined that lags could potentially influence outcomes for
12 out of the 41 sub-scales. Norway data timing only lagged
0.13 years behind the target date and had very little impact
on overall scores.
For six sub-scales, the change in the New Zealand sub-
scale ranks for the following year 1994/1995 more accurately
gauged the actual improvement in the 1993/94 time frame.
These were Economic Sectors, Export of Goods and
Services, Imports of Goods and Services, Patents, Energy
Self-Sufficiency, and Educational Structures. In these cases,
the time lags meant that four of these sub-scales showed
larger improvements for 1994/95 than for 1993/94, one
remained unchanged, and one showed that a fall for 1993/94
had become a rise in 1994/95.
For the National Debt sub-scale, two out of four New
Zealand figures were three years out of date. OECD data
shows that New Zealand reduced its net national debt during
that three-year period. This would have improved New
Zealand’s ranking by 6 ranks. The 1993/94 sub-scale rank
remained unchanged on the IMD Index. It should have been
recorded as a positive improvement.
For the Government Expenditure sub-scale, New Zealand
data for levels of government employment was seven years
out of date. OECD data shows that overall government
employment in central administration and defense fell by 6%
between 1989 and 1993. Therefore the ranking on the
Government Expenditures sub-scale should have been higher
than it actually was, but the size of the annual change for
1993/94 was positive and therefore was not corrected.
For the Environment sub-scale, figures for all countries
lagged three years behind the target date therefore this scale
is not useful for assessing improvements in 1993/1994.
The Productivity sub-scale has five data inputs. For New
Zealand, one was missing, one was up to date, one was a
1990/95 trend for overall productivity, one was two years out
of date, and crucially important, agricultural productivity was
five years out of date. OECD data reports that the New
Zealand economy grew 0.5% in 1990, shrank 1.8% in 1991,
resumed a slow upward trend in 1992, and then grew more
rapidly in 1993 to attain an annual value of 5.5% by 1994,
the largest among OECD countries. Therefore, although the
Productivity sub-scale showed an improvement in rank, the
size of the improvement (only one place) is too small.
For the R & D Resources sub-scale, four of the six New
Zealand data inputs are three years out of date, one is two
years out of date, and one is up to date. New Zealand’s rank
on this sub-scale declined in the 1994 IMD Index and then
resumed an upward trend in the 1994, 1995, and 1996 IMD
publications. Therefore, it is assumed that the positive
change recorded in the 1995/1996 IMD publications more
accurately reflect the conditions prevalent in 1993.
Data irregularities had an impact on performance in only
one sub-scale of the Norwegian data. Two out of three
figures for Capital Formation were one year out of date,
while the fourth factor was a four-year growth rate. This sub-
scale declined between 1993/94, but increased strongly
between 1994/95, which more accurately reflects the Capital
Formation in 1993/94.
5.3. Trends
26 data inputs (11.6%) are trends. These trends are
variously reported over 3 to 5 years as average annual growth
percentage rates, annual compound percentage growth rates,
or geometric means. The sharpness of the improvements in
the New Zealand economy in 1993 evident in OECD
Surveys [38] demonstrates that data from trends used in the
IMD Index will greatly underestimate the rapid improvement
in the economy and expansion in business confidence, which
occurred during 1993. Thus the impact of trends used in the
IMD Index will mean that the regression analysis reported in
the previous section underestimates the significance of
improvements in the New Zealand economy. A similar,
though less-marked effect is evident in the oil-based
Norwegian economy, which experienced an unexpected
surge in domestic growth beginning in 1993 at 2%, and
doubling in 1994 to a record 4%.
5.4. Correction of IMD Scores for Data Irregularities
The detailed consideration of sub-scales shows that the
analysis would be more accurate if timing could be adjusted,
and more so if the effect of trends and size were also partialed
out of the analysis. Whilst the time involved in such data
collection and adjustment is prohibitive for the single
researcher (the analyzed panel data is derived from 72,128
single data inputs), it has been possible to estimate the effect
that the adjustment of timing and size would have on the
overall rank of New Zealand and Norway for 1993 and 1994.
This involves an approximation—a proportional approach to
adjust the 41 sub-scales recorded as ranked data only in the
1996 yearbook. Each sub-scale accounts for a specific known
proportion of the overall IMD index according to how many
source data points feed into the calculation of the overall Index.
If 1993/94 New Zealand data is on average one year out of
date on a particular sub-scale compared to data from other
nations in the same category, the 1994/95 sub-scale ranking of
New Zealand can be used to proportionally adjust the 1993/94
rank to more accurately reflect the 1993/94 change.
This is a relatively simple, if time consuming, procedure. It is
also the most conservative method of adjusting the IMD Index
for timing that can be adopted. No adjustments for the effect of
growth rates averaged over time were used. Our protocol
underestimated the score and rank of New Zealand and Norway
in 1994 as compared to the effect of completely recalculating
the IMD Index. After this proportional adjustment, the z scores
of the 24 ‘size-related’ categories were subtracted from the
IMD Index. On the new scale, which more accurately reflects
the ‘economic vibrancy’ of countries, New Zealand rose from
38.75 in 1993 to 78.05 in 1994—a rise of 39.3 units (compared
to 23.89 on the unadjusted scale). Norway rose from 27.69 in
1993 to 55.42 in 1994—a rise of 27.73 units (compared to
26.47 on the unadjusted scale). Since it was not feasible to
Journal of Health and Environmental Research 2017; 3(3-1): 16-31 25
adjust the data for the remaining 44 countries, the corrected
scale must be considered preliminary. However, the relatively
high proportion of timing irregularities in the New Zealand
analysis justifies the utility of this partial approach to data
correction. The more so since the majority of other data
irregularities are clustered among a few countries such as
Russia, which are near the bottom of the IMD Index, well away
from New Zealand and Norway. It is evident that the correction
of the IMD Index for New Zealand and Norway would have a
large positive impact on both the statistical significance of the
size of the change between 1993/94 and on the overall rank of
both countries in 1994 (New Zealand is 5th overall and Norway
10th on the resulting Economic Vibrancy Scale
3
).
6. Subsidiary Analysis
6.1. Breadth of Improvement on Index Sub-scales
The IMD reports ranks for each country for 1992-1996 on
the 41 sub-scales that contribute to the overall IMD Index
[29]. Subsidiary analysis of these ranks was undertaken to
test whether the improvement of factors contributing to the
rise in IMD scores was broad-based.
Figure 2. IMD Index Structure—Grouped By 8 Categories and 41 Sub-
Scales.
3
This higher score is commensurate with scores from the World Economic Forum
Index of international competitiveness which placed New Zealand 3rd and
Norway 7th in 1996. The World Economic Forum Index used to work jointly with
IMD, but since 1996 it has published its own Ind ex which places more emphasis
than IMD on openness to trade and investment, the effici ency of gover nment and
the financial sector, labor market flexibility and educational attainment.
For each country and each year, the number of sub-scales
that increased or fell in rank were recorded as a positive or
negative integers; by summing these two figures an overall
performance of ‘integer change in rank’ for sub-scales is
obtained for each country for each pair of years. For 1993/4,
New Zealand improved its rank on 26 sub-scales, remained
unchanged on 11 and fell back on 4 sub-scales. Norway
improved its rank on 28 sub-scales, remained unchanged on
7, and fell back on 5. Thus for 1993/94, New Zealand’s score
was 26 - 4 = +22 and Norway’s score was 28 - 5 = +23.
For each of the 36 countries with complete sub-scale data
for all years of the sample, the net number of sub-scale ranks
showing improvement from the previous year was calculated
for each country for 1993-1996. The net improvement in sub-
scale ranks was calculated as the number of increased ranks
minus decreased ranks. The resulting integer net-
improvement totals were then converted to z scores for
statistical analysis. The sample included four annual
observations for each of 36 countries, yielding a total of 144
observations.
Adjustments of timing for New Zealand and Norway were
then incorporated into the subsidiary analysis of sub-scales
using the information reported previously. Now New Zealand
shows a net gain in rank of +27 out of 39 available sub-scales
and Norway +25 out of 40 available sub-scales.
6.2. Analysis of Breadth of Improvement on IMD Index
Sub-scales
Panel regression analysis employing the Beck and Katz
method as before was used to test the hypothesis that the
onset of the Maharishi Effect in 1993 resulted in a significant
average net improvement in sub-scale ranks for New Zealand
and Norway relative to other countries in the sample. This
subsidiary analysis, thus, investigated the hypothesis that the
latter two countries showed an improvement in the IMD
index from 1993 to 1994 that was significantly more broad-
based than that experienced by the other 34 countries. Space
does not allow us to include the full results of this analysis,
which may be obtained from the authors.
Figure 3. Change in Sub-Scale ranks—positive minus negative change
1992-1996.
In summary our parameter estimate indicates that, on
average, the net number of increased index sub-scale ranks
for New Zealand and Norway for 1993-1994 was 27.592
units higher than the mean rank-improvement score for the
26 Guy Hatchard and Kenneth Cavanaugh: The Effect of Coherent Collective Consciousness on National Quality of Life and
Economic Performance Indicators—An Analysis of the IMD Index of National Competitive Advantage
remaining 34 countries over the whole sample. The
magnitude of the estimated Maharishi Effect parameter was
both statistically significant (p = 0.000033) and substantial in
magnitude. The parameter estimate is nearly three (2.88)
times the size of the inherent variability of the dependent
variable, as measured by the latter's standard deviation. By
the standards of social science, this is a large effect and lends
substantial support to the primary analysis, the modeling of
effect as a step function, and the unique character of the
changes in New Zealand and Norway.
7. Discussion
The statistical analysis has measured the significance of
the rises in Norway and New Zealand relative to all
individual changes among countries and years including any
other large rises. To assess further whether this change was
unique, the annual change for each year and each country
was expressed as a percentage of the standard deviation for
the overall scores in that year. New Zealand rose by 35% in
93/94 and Norway by 39%. All other annual changes in
scores were inspected; those above 25% are discussed on a
case-by-case basis as follows.
The IMD scores show some volatility4, but most of the
larger rises tend to be relatively short lived. This was true of
Argentina, Chile, Korea, Taiwan, Philippines, United
Kingdom, Russia, Poland, Spain, and Luxembourg. None of
the above fitted the step function model used to assess the
significance of rises in New Zealand and Norway.
Only Canada (24% and 25% between 94/96), Ireland (27% in
96/97), USA (34% in 96/97), Hungary (36% in 97/98), China
(30% in 95/96 and 32% in 97/98), and Finland (43% in 96/97)
have had sustained annual rises of more than 25% of the
standard deviation of IMD scores. The influence of the
Maharishi Effect on Canada and the USA created by a
coherence-creating group in Iowa has already been the subject
of research (Cavanaugh 1987, 88, 89). In fact, many Canadians
participate in the coherence-creating group in Fairfield, Iowa.
Similarly, there is a UK coherence-creating group in Merseyside
with many Irish participants. The authors cannot assess the
impact of such groups on their IMD performance. China and
Hungary are rising in economic performance from a very low
relative base line and are therefore not strictly comparable with
New Zealand and Norway.
Finland does have a comparable economy but it does not
have a coherence-creating group. Its IMD score improved
43% of the SD between 1996 and 1997, larger than the
1993/94 changes in Norway and New Zealand. OECD
Surveys throw light on the nature of the economic resurgence
in Finland. Prior to their collapse in 1990, Finland had a
4
Vo l a t i l i t y i n t h e I M D o v e r a l l s c o r e s r e s u l t s p a r t l y from the survey content of the
Index (33%). Surveys reflect both the long and short-term views of participating
executives; they also reflect changes in national mood. This can mirror the current
business and political climate, which can be subject to short-term fluctuations.
The IMD Index is also sensitive to regional economic factors, currency
fluctuations, overseas investor confidence, stability of specific global markets,
and regional conflicts.
strong economic relationship with the countries of the former
Soviet Union. From mid 1990 up to 1993, Finland’s real
GDP fell by almost 15% and unemployment rose from 3.5%
to 19%. The terms of trade deteriorated. There was a
financial crisis resulting in the devaluation of the currency.
Following this, the 1995 OECD Finland Economic Survey
concluded that the strong recovery of exports to former
Comecon countries was striking, with Finnish sales to
Central and Eastern Europe currently returning to levels that
prevailed just before the collapse of trade with this region in
1990/91. During this recovery, exports to the EU remained
largely stagnant and unemployment was still running at 17%
in 1996. In 1997, the OECD Survey reported that Finland
had fully recovered the enormous loss in output that it
sustained after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Therefore
the large rise in IMD Competitiveness ratings for Finland
between 1996 and 1997 was actually a recovery from the
massive economic shock that the country sustained after the
collapse of the Soviet Union. Nor did Finland enjoy the
balanced nature of the recovery in New Zealand and Norway
where unemployment fell as the economy gained speed
5
, as
confirmed by OECD Surveys [38].
8. Analysis of Causality
The improvement in the competitiveness scores of Norway
and New Zealand is highly statistically significant, but it is
important to discuss the reasons why they lend support to a
causal interpretation. The analysis has established a strong
correlation between events; on their own, correlation and
simultaneity of events only strengthen causality arguments,
but do not prove causality. Granger [20] suggests that the
temporal sequence of events is crucial to establishing
causality. In essence, if X precedes Y, then X is a good
candidate for a causal factor, but Y is not. Moreover, because
economic systems involve a complexity of mutually
interacting variables, if X is clearly exogenous to the existing
economic system then the argument for causality is
strengthened [47] Hendry and Richard [26] agree and place
emphasis on the need for a satisfactory explanatory model.
More than this, the examination of other potential causal
factors is essential. With these factors in mind, we can
discuss the arguments for causality.
8.1. Timing
Within the limits imposed by annual data, the statistical
analysis shows that there was a significant improvement in a
broad measure of the economic health of Norway and New
Zealand at the time predicted by theory, when the Maharishi
Effect threshold was surpassed. This shows a correlation,
which lends support to a causal hypothesis. The subsidiary
5
Economic theory predicts that there should be a negative relationship between
unemployment rate and economic growth. This empirical regularity known as
‘Okun’s Law’ states that the unemployment rate will decline by 0.4% for every
1% of annual real GNP growth above its trend rate of growth [15]. This was not
the case during the recovery in Finland, which underlines the unusual nature of
the economic changes taking place there.
Journal of Health and Environmental Research 2017; 3(3-1): 16-31 27
analysis, which makes the timing of the data inputs more
exact, strengthens this correlation considerably. Examination
of all other relatively large individual movements in national
IMD Index scores, has shown that most of these were
examples of volatility or due to other causes.
8.2. Economic Forecasts
OECD forecasts did not predict the speed, timing, and
depth of the improvements in the Norwegian and New
Zealand economies. In retrospect, in 1998 the OECD reached
the conclusion that 80% of the massive New Zealand
government debt repayment achieved between 1994 and
1998 was not predicted by prior cyclical trends. Moreover,
most influential New Zealand economic commentators did
not see any prospect of significant short-term economic
recovery even as late as 1992. For example, in a landmark
study of the New Zealand economy, Michael Porter and
Graham Crocombe wrote in 1991:
“The New Zealand economy is not well suited to the
imperatives of the modern global economy. Despite recent
refo rms, our economy has contin ue d to languish. The weak
competitive position of many of our industries remains
essentially unchanged. Government spending has become an
even larger drain on the national economy.
If New Zealand is to become a prosperous nation in the
next century, broad-based systematic change is required—in
attitudes, institutions, policies, and strategies. These changes
will take decades fully to bear fruit...” [11, p. 177]
This broad-based change came about not slowly through
changes in attitudes, institutions, policies, and strategies as
Porter and Crocombe suggest, but rapidly pointing to a novel
cause such as the Maharishi Effect. These results are
suggestive of the capacity of Maharishi Effect theory to
predict economic improvements that were not anticipated by
traditional economic theory.
8.3. Other Economies
The authors have published elsewhere [24, 25] case
studies of the Maharishi Effect in Cambodia (see also
Fergusson [16]), Mozambique, Merseyside, and USA, which
record similar broad-based improvements. These case studies
strengthen causality arguments, since they imply that the
Maharishi Effect theory is robust, repeatable, and portable;
especially since these four economies are radically different
from one another. Cambodia and Mozambique are formerly
the poorest nations in the world; USA is arguably the richest,
while Merseyside is an industrial metropolitan area.
8.4. Replication
Since various effects have been found in 47 previous
research studies [36], these replicated effects lend support to
a causal interpretation of the findings reported here. Many of
the previous studies use powerful time series analysis
techniques, where daily, weekly or monthly movements in
the dependent variable above and below the Maharishi Effect
threshold have been shown to lead positive and negative
changes respectively in the dependent variables (see for
example [40]). The prospective study of the Maharishi Effect
in Washington D. C. [23] also bolsters the argument for
causality since the timing and size of the effect on violent
crime were predicted in advance.
8.5. Model Sufficiency and Fit
The rapid onset of broad-based improvement in the IMD
Index of social and economic indicators and its sub-scales
provides a very good fit with the phase transition or step
function model of Maharishi Effect theory used in prior
research (see [25] for a full discussion of theory). Parameter
constancy is also indicated since both New Zealand and
Norway had comparable effect sizes.
8.6. Alternative Explanations
A c rucia l a dju nct to ca usal ana lysis mus t be a d isc ussion of
alternative explanations. For example, OECD surveys seek to
describe the causes of economic changes among their
member countries in terms of government policy, domestic
demand, strength of sectors, educational characteristics of the
work force, and international factors such as export demand,
exchange rates, and world economy. Particular emphasis is
placed on the effect of government policy. Therefore, in
seeking to identify the causes of the improvements in New
Zealand, the OECD [38] discussed the role of government
economic reforms that took place from 1983 to 1990. With
hindsight, it described the New Zealand economy as having
“the least distorted economy among OECD members”.
Wer e t he N ew Ze ala nd fi sc al r ef or ms in th e 1 98 0s th e
cause of the 1993/4 improvements in IMD scores? In part,
the answer is that the improvements were far broader than
could be anticipated from the nature of the reforms. The
improvements appeared in virtually all economic sectors. A
close study of OECD Summaries [38] shows that as late as
December 1992, the OECD itself did not expect the
sweeping economic reforms undertaken mainly in the mid
1980s to correct what it saw as fundamental imbalances in
the New Zealand economy. In this, it was drawing upon its
previous experience of the possible effects of government
policy changes among its members.
Porter and Crocombe [11, p. 8, 10, and 12] also reject this
explanation strongly—“The failure of heavy government
intervention was obvious, yet the early results of a rapid
transition to a market economy appeared to hold little
promise... Why despite one of the most rapid and far-
reaching econo mic liberalizations ever [begun eight years
earlier], does our economy continue to languish and
unemployment soar?...[This book] highlights how New
Zealand’s institutions and policies have retarded the progress
of the economy.”
Porter also suggested that the resource-dependent nature of
the New Zealand economy was indicative of poor prospects
[11]. Moreover, other significant New Zealand economic
commentators [5] also believed as late as 1992 that not only
was there little prospect of a significant improvement in the
28 Guy Hatchard and Kenneth Cavanaugh: The Effect of Coherent Collective Consciousness on National Quality of Life and
Economic Performance Indicators—An Analysis of the IMD Index of National Competitive Advantage
economy, but also that the government reforms of the 1980s
had in fact harmed the economy.
It is clear that the changes in government policy in New
Zealand occurred many years before the economic
improvements from 1993 onwards. Therefore it is natural for
Porter and other economists to reject government policy as
an explanatory principle. Moreover, our analysis and
previous research has located similar effects of coherence in
five nations, each with radically different government
policies [25].
Another possible explanation is the supposition that the
economies of major trading partners improved sufficiently to
stimulate the growth in New Zealand and Norway. However,
our analysis is comparative and it demonstrates a larger
improvement in New Zealand and Norway than their trading
partners. Therefore this argument must be rejected.
In general the strongest argument against other
explanations is the generalized nature of the IMD Index. It
includes 224 social and economic factors. The
simultaneously move of such a broad range of factors,
strongly suggests an exogenous variable. The coherence in
collective consciousness is a clear candidate for this position.
Moreover, Cavanaugh [7-10] controlled some other
economic variables suggested by modern economic theory,
and found that the influence of the Maharishi Effect on the
Misery Index in USA was robust.
8.7. Effect of Foreign Investment
Foreign investment is another alternative exogenous
variable. By the end of 1994, both New Zealand and Norway
had dramatically increased their attractiveness to foreign
investors. On the IMD scale of attractiveness, New Zealand
rose from 9th overall to 5th and Norway from 23rd overall to
10th between 1993 and 1994. In 1994, there was a net inflow
of overseas investment in stocks of New Zealand companies
of US$12.42 billion. This is US$3,500 for every man woman
and child in New Zealand, the second highest level of per
capita overseas investment in the world (second only to
Singapore). This represents 22% of New Zealand’s GDP, a t
the time the fourth highest ratio of investment to GDP in the
world (just behind Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia).
Norway has also had a large rise in net inflow of overseas
investment up from US$3.16 billion in 1992 to US$14.33
billion in 1994. This shows the rapid growth in confidence
that the rest of the world had in the economies of New
Zealand and Norway, but the timing of the investment does
not fit as a causal factor, since foreign investment did not
start to kick in until later in 1994 when the massive shift in
the economic prospects and performance had already taken
place and then began to attract international investors. The
more so since such investment was largely predatory of
assets or land rather than immediately stimulating new
economic activity
6
.
6
Foreign investors are looking for monetary gains; they do not necessarily care
about the long-term interests of target countries. They will tend to pull the plug on
investments for short-term reasons [37], [43].
8.8. Independent Confirmation of Economic Progress:
OECD Economic Surveys
The improvements in the economies of New Zealand and
Norway have been independently assessed by OECD
Surveys published biannually. The surveys confirm the
unusual, far reaching, unexpected, and sustained nature of
the economic resurgence in both countries. Among other
things, OECD surveys found that both New Zealand and
Norway enjoyed sustained periods of low inflation, high
economic growth, and low unemployment after the
Maharishi Effect threshold was passed. It is quite clear that
the OECD was taken aback by the speed and depth of the
economic changes in both countries. The trends were not
predicted accurately in earlier forecasts and were
characterized as atypical or unexpected in later reports after
the changes emerged in 1993/4.
8.9. Were the Economic Changes in Norway and New
Zealand Sustained
The impact of the Maharishi Effect on the economy of
New Zealand and Norway has been modeled as a step
function—in 1993/4 it is clear that the economy of both
countries ‘stepped up’ to a new level of performance. By the
beginning of 1998, New Zealand and Norway had enjoyed
five years of sustained economic growth with low inflation
and low unemployment. The relevant 1999 OECD Economic
Surveys [38] concluded that the strong performance of the
Norwegian economy since 1993 has lifted mainland GDP by
20% in only five years, and during the last five years New
Zealand has experienced relatively rapid economic expansion
by both past and international standards.
9. Cost Benefit Analysis
Our results suggest an intriguing strategy for national
economic development. Some economists have suggested the
general distribution of a minimum wage will be an effective
strategy to stimulate economic development. The approach
suggested by our results is a program to increase coherence
in collective consciousness by increasing creativity and
optimum brain functioning among a small select group of the
population, who then produce a highly influential field effect
among the whole population. Is this practical and cost
effective? Other studies have assessed the economic impact
of the Maharishi Effect through reduced crime [24] and
reduced healthcare costs [27]. These findings indicated
substantial savings. Hatchard [25, chap. nine] undertook a
more global measure of the economic impact of the
Maharishi Effect on the New Zealand economy whose
conclusions we summarize here.
9.1. GDP and Government Debt Reduction in New Zealand
Comparing 1988-92 and 1993-97 New Zealand had a
relative increase in real GDP growth rate per capita of 3.28%
p.a.. Excluding oil revenues, Norway had an increase in real
GDP Growth rate of 3.43% p.a. after the Maharishi Effect
Journal of Health and Environmental Research 2017; 3(3-1): 16-31 29
threshold had been surpassed. To estimate of how much of
the increase in GDP is due to the Maharishi Effect, Hatchard
[25] examined the principle sources of government revenue.
New Zealand government treasury and OECD sources show
that after the coherence threshold was passed in 1993, the
New Zealand government retired 23.5% of GDP in net total
debt over a four-year period. During this time real GDP
increased from US$42.6 billion to US$47.5 billion.
Figure 4. Government Debt New Zealand and OECD Average 1990-98.
Using OECD data, net debt was reduced from US$21.1
billion to US$12.4 billion—a total of US$8.7 billion in debt
retirement. This is a very significant economic performance
for a small nation. The government had been facing a
persistently high debt to GDP ratio that defied fiscally
conservative reform prior to the coherence threshold being
passed in 1993. New Zealand’s subsequent performance
approximates the step function typical of the Maharishi
Effect. The OECD Secretariat calculated that only one-fifth
of the debt reduction ($1.7 billion) could be accounted for by
prior cyclical trends. This indicates a phase transition in the
New Zealand economy when it reached the coherence
threshold in 1993 and supports our view discussed elsewhere
(Hatchard 2000) that the dynamics of the economy had
changed.
The OECD also reported that during the 1994-1997
period, the government received NZ$3.24 billion (US$1.62
billion) in sales of assets and lowered personal income tax
rates by 0.6% of household income and indirect taxes by
0.5% of GDP during this four year period—a total of
approximately US$1.36 billion. Taking the headline figure of
US$8.7 billion in net government debt reduction, subtracting
the US$1.96 billion identified as resulting from previous
trends and the US$1.62 billion in asset sales, and adding the
US$1.36 in tax reductions, the New Zealand government had
a net gain of US$6.48 billion over four years.
During this four-year period, economic activity increased
by US$14.44 billion compared to the previous trend. This
yielded a tax revenue benefit @ 38% of US$5.49 billion to
the New Zealand Government. In addition, the government
benefited by US$1.02 billion in reduced welfare payments to
the unemployed. The sum of increased tax revenues and
reduced unemployment benefits is US$6.51 billion.
The cost of instructing one per cent of the population of
New Zealand in the Transcendental Meditation program at
1999 prices is 38,000 x $575 = NZ$21.85 million (US$10.93
million).
In summary the New Zealand Government had a net debt
reduction of US$6.48 billion, which, according to the OECD,
could not be accounted for by previous cyclical trends; and a
net increase in revenues from increased tax-take and reduced
unemployment of US$6.51 billion. The equivalence of these
two headline figures suggests that the net increase in tax
revenues was the entirely the result of new economic factors
not predicted by previous economic trends. On this basis, it
would be very conservative to rely on Cavanaugh’s time
series analysis [7-10] which reports that 54% of the reduction
in the Misery Index in the USA was due to the Maharishi
Effect. Taking 54% of the improved economic performance
of New Zealand to be the result of coherence creating, we
arrive at $713 increase in GDP over four years for each $1
spent implementing the coherence creating strategy and
corresponding benefits to the government coming to $320.
This suggests that each person learning the Transcendental
Meditation program generated US$205,000 in increased
GDP over a four-year period.
9.2. Coherence as an Economic Multiplier
Our cost-benefit summary suggests that a coherence
creating program can be added to any economic system as an
economic multiplier. In effect a cascade of benefits are
stimulated in the economy; the estimated government saving
of $320 for every dollar invested represents an annual rate of
return on capital of 8,000%. Moreover, some savings are
unquantified due to either a lack of empirical data to support
an estimate or the essentially ‘priceless’ and vital nature of
commodities such as ‘improved quality of life’ or ‘increased
creativity and innovation’.
10. Conclusion
The empirical data and statistical analysis presented in this
study lends support to the hypothesis that the Maharishi
Effect had a substantial impact on the IMD Index scores of
National Competitive Advantage for both New Zealand and
Norway. This suggests a basis for wealth generation in a
coherence creating approach to national economic
development. Results of analysis, previous research and case
studies reported here appear to provide governments with a
simple-to-implement, highly cost-effective intervention to
develop national human resources, multiply investment, and
improve economic performance.
We ha ve fo un d t ha t a s t he M aha ri sh i E ffe ct st im ul ates
economic growth, the wealth generated is distributed in
different ways through the economic channels that are active
in that nation, and by the government via the taxation and
spending process. In New Zealand debt repayment was a
priority for their government. This was achieved on a
massive and unprecedented scale after the Maharishi Effect
30 Guy Hatchard and Kenneth Cavanaugh: The Effect of Coherent Collective Consciousness on National Quality of Life and
Economic Performance Indicators—An Analysis of the IMD Index of National Competitive Advantage
threshold was passed. In Norway, the government spent
heavily on social welfare, health, and education.
Coherence creating represents a unique form of ethical
investment that appears to not only create conditions
necessary to underpin economic growth but also to
dynamically multiply itself hundreds of times in the wider
economy thereby benefiting the entire population by
stimulating GDP, as well as reducing unemployment,
inflation, and government debt. This understanding extends
the growing perception that human factors underlie the
growth and stability of economic systems [45].
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Fred Travis and Maxwell Rainforth of
Maharishi University of Management for critical assistance
with analysis and presentation.
References
[1] BALESTRA, P.: 1996, ‘Fixed effect models and fixed
coefficient models’, In L. Matyas and P. Sevestre (eds.), The
Econometrics of Panel Data, pp. 34-49. (Dordrecht: Kluwer
Academic Publishers).
[2] BALTAGI, B. H.: 1995, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data,
(New York: Wiley).
[3] BECK, N. and KATZ, J. N.: 1995, ‘What to do (and not to do)
with time-series cross-section data’, American Political
Science Review 89, pp 634-637.
[4] BECK, N. and KATZ, J. N.: 1996, ‘Nuisance vs. substance:
Specifying and estimating time-series cross-section models’,
Political Analysis 6, pp 1-36.
[5] BURNELL, S. J. and SHEPPARD, D. K.: 1992, ‘Upgrading
New Zealand’s competitive advantage: A critique and some
proposals’, New Zealand Economic Papers 26 (1), pp 101 -
125.
[6] CAVANAUGH, K. L., ORME-JOHNSON, D. W., and
GELDERLOOS, P.: 1984, ‘The effect of the Taste of Utopia
Assembly on the World Index of international stock prices’. In
CHALMERS, R. A.; CLEMENTS, G.; SCHENKLUHN, H.;
and WEINLESS, M., eds.: 1989, Scientific Research on
Maharishi’s Transcendental Meditation and TM-Sidhi
Programme: Collected Papers, Volume 4. Vlodrop, the
Netherlands: Maharishi Vedic University Press.
[7] CAVANAUGH, K. L.: 1987, ‘Time series analysis of U. S.
and Canadian inflation and unemployment: A test of a field-
theoretic hypothesis’, Proceedings of the American Statistical
Association, Business and Economics Statistics Section
(Alexandria, Virginia: American Statistical Association), pp
799-804.
[8] CAVANAUGH, K. L. and KING, K. D.: 1988, ‘Simultaneous
transfer function analysis of Okun’s misery index:
Improvements in the economic quality of life through
Maharishi’s Vedic Science and technology of consciousness’,
Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Business
and Economics Statistics Section (Alexandria, Virginia:
American Statistical Association), pp 491-496.
[9] CAVANAUGH, K. L.; KING, K. D.; and ERTUNA, C.: 1989,
‘A multiple-input transfer function model of Okun’s misery
index: An empirical test of the Maharishi Effect’, Proceedings
of the American Statistical Association (Alexandria, Virginia),
Business and Economics Statistics Section pp 565-570.
[10] CAVANAUGH, K. L.; KING, K. D.; and TITUS, B. D.: 1989,
‘Consciousness and the quality of economic life: Empirical
research on the macroeconomic effects of the collective
practice of Maharishi’s Transcendental Meditation and TM-
Sidhi program’, in R. G. Greenwood (ed.), Proceedings of the
Midwest Management Society (Chicago, Illinois: Midwest
Management Society), pp 183-190.
[11] CROCOMBE, G. T., ENRIGHT, M. J., and PORTER, M. E.:
1991, Upgrading New Zealand’s Competitive Advantage,
(Oxford University Press, Auckland).
[12] DILLBECK, M. C.; CAVANAUGH, K. L.; GLENN, T.;
ORME-JOHNSON, D. W. and MITTLEFEHLDT, V.: 1987,
‘Consciousness as a field: The Transcendental Meditation and
TM-Sidhi program and changes in social indicators’, The
Journal of Mind and Behavior 8: 67-104.
[13] DILLBECK, M. C., BANS, C. B., POLANZI, C. and
LANDRITH III, G. S.: 1988, ‘Test of a field model of
consciousness and social change: The Transcendental
Meditation and TM-Sidhi program & decreased urban crime’,
The Journal of Mind and Behavior 9, pp. 457-486. Some
authors separated with, and some with; Need.
[14] DILLBECK, M. C. and RAINFORTH, M. V.: 1996, ‘Impact
assessment analysis of Beverly quality of life indices: Effects
of group practice of the Transcendental Meditation and TM-
Sidhi program’, Proceedings of the American Statistical
Association, Social Statistics Section, pp 38-43.
[15] DORNBUSCH, R. and FISCHER, S.: 1988, Macroeconomics
(4th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York).
[16] FERGUSSON, L. Vedic Science-Based Education, Poverty
Removal, and Social Well Being, Journal of Indian Education,
Vo l . X XX X I , N o 4 , F e b 2 0 1 6 .
[17] FOMBY, T. B, HILL, R. C., and JOHNSON, S. R.: 1984,
Advanced Econometric Methods, (New York: Springer-
Ve rl ag ) .
[18] GODFREY, L. G.: 1988, Misspecification Tests in
Econometrics, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
[19] GOODMAN, R. S.: 1997, ‘The Maharishi Effect and
Government: Effects of a national demonstration project and a
permanent group of Transcendental Meditation and TM-Sidhi
program practitioners on success, public approval, and
coherence in the Clinton, Reagan, and Bush presidencies’,
Doctoral Dissertation, Maharishi University of Management.
Also in proceedings of the 1997 Annual Meeting of the
American Political Science Association, Washington D. C.
[20] GRANGER, C. W. J.: 1969, ‘Investigating causal relations by
econometric models and cross spectral methods’,
Econometrica, 33 pp 428-438.
[21] GREENE, W. H.: 2000, Econometric Analysis, (4th edition.
Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice-Hall).
[22] HAGELIN, J.: 1987, ‘Is consciousness the unified field? A
field theorist's perspective’, Modern Science and Vedic
Science 1, pp. 28-87.
Journal of Health and Environmental Research 2017; 3(3-1): 16-31 31
[23] HAGELIN, J. S., ORME-JOHNSON, D. W., RAINFORTH,
M., CAVANAUGH, K., ALEXANDER, C. N.: 1999, ‘Results
of the National demonstration project to reduce violent crime
and improve government effectiveness in Washington D. C.’,
Social Indicators Research 47 (May), pp 153-201.
[24] HATCHARD, G. CAVANAUGH, K. L., DEANS, A., and
ORME-JOHNSON, D. W.: 1996, ‘The Maharishi Effect.: A
model for social improvement: Time series analysis of a phase
transition to reduced crime in Merseyside metropolitan area’,
Psychology, Crime, and Law 2 (3), pp 165-174.
[25] HATCHARD, G. D.: 2000, ‘Maharishi Vedic Economy:
Wholeness on the Move. An Analysis of Improved Quality of
Life and Enhanced Economic Performance Through the
Application of the Maharishi Effect in New Zealand, Norway,
USA, Mozambique, and Metropolitan Merseyside, UK’, PhD
Dissertation, Maharishi University of Management, IA. 389
pages, download at http://wwwlib.umi.com; and UMI
Dissertation Abstracts International. 61, no. 04B: p2271. PDF
of full dissertation available from the author, email:
ghatchard@gmail.com.
[26] HENDRY, D. F. and RICHARD, J-F.: 1982, ‘On the
formulation of empirical models’. Journal of Econometrics,
Vo l 2 0 (3 ) p p 3 - 3 3 .
[27] HERRON, R. E., HILLIS, S. L. MANDARINS, J. V., ORME-
JOHNSON, D. W. and WALTON, K. G.: 1996, ‘The impact of
the Transcendental Mediation program on government
payments to physicians in Quebec’, American Journal of
Health Promotion, 10 (3), pp 208-216.
[28] HSIAO, C.: 1986, Analysis of Panel Data, (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press).
[29] International Management Development (IMD): 1987-98, The
World Competitiveness Yearbook, Published annually under
various names including World Economic Forum and World
Competitiveness Report, Lausanne, Switzerland.
[30] JARQUE C. M. and BERA A. K.: 1987, ‘A test for normality
of observations and regression residuals’, International
Statistical Review 55, pp 163-172.
[31] KENNEDY, P.: 1998, A Guide to Econometrics, (4th ed.
Cambridge: MIT Press).
[32] KMENTA, J.: 1986, Elements of Econometrics, (2nd ed. New
Yo rk : M ac m i ll a n ).
[33] MAHARISHI MAHESH YOGI: 1963, Science of Being and
Art of Living-Transcendental Meditation, (Meridian Books,
Penguin Group USA Inc., New York).
[34] MAHARISHI MAHESH YOGI: 1994, Maharishi Vedic
University: An Introduction, (Maharishi Vedic University
Press, Holland).
[35] MAHARISHI MAHESH YOGI: 1995, Maharishi’s Absolute
Theory of Government, (Age of Enlightenment Publications,
India).
[36] MAHARISHI UNIVERSITY OF MANAGEMENT: 2004,
<http://www.mum.edu/m_effect/summary_table.html> Web
site: Summary of 47 papers of Scientific Research on the
Maharishi Effect.
<http://www.mum.edu/tm_research/tm_biblio/welcome.html>
web site: bibliography of 600 studies on the Transcendental
Meditation and TM-Sidhi program.
[37] NAYLOR, R. T.: 1994, ‘Hot Money and The Politics of Debt’,
(2nd Edition, Black Rose Books, Montreal).
[38] Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development
(OECD): 1989-2002 OECD Economic Surveys (published
biannually for member countries). Norway 1993, 1995, 1997,
1998, 1999, 2002; New Zealand 1990/1, 1993, 1996, 1999,
2002; Finland 1995; USA 1990, 1992; Paris. See also OECD
publication: Main Economic Indicators, published monthly
and the OECD journal Outlook.
[39] ORME-JOHNSON, D. W. and GELDERLOOS, P.: 1988,
‘The long-term effects of the Maharishi Technology of the
Unified Field on the quality of life in the United States (1960
to 1983)’, Social Science Perspectives Jour. 2 (4) pp 127-146.
[40] ORME-JOHNSON, D. W.; ALEXANDER, C. N.; DAVIES, J.
L.; CHANDLER, H. M.; and LARIMORE, W. E.: 1988,
‘International peace project in the Middle East: The effect of
the Maharishi Technology of the Unified Field’, Journal of
Conflict Resolution, 32, pp 776-812.
[41] ORME-JOHNSON, D. W.; DILLBECK, M. C.; and
ALEXANDER, C. N.: 2003, ‘Preventing terrorism and
international conflict: Effects of large assemblies of
participants in the Transcendental Meditation and TM-Sidhi
programs’, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 36: 283–302.
[42] ORME-JOHNSON, D. W. Factor Analysis of Social
Indicators in the Middle East: Effects of Cultural, Military,
Political, and Climatic Events and Group Practice of the
Transce nden tal Med itation and TM-Sidhi Program. Jo urnal of
Maharishi Vedic Research Institute, No. 1, Nov. 2016.
[43] PATN AIK , P.: 1 99 7, ‘ Th e c on te xt a nd co ns eq uen ce s of
economic liberalisation in India’. Journal of International
Trade and Eco nomi c De velo pment , Ju ly.
[44] PORTER, M. E.: 1990, ‘The Competitive Advantage of
Nations’, Harvard Business Review, March-April.
[45] ROMER, P.: 1996, ‘Endogenous technological change’ in
GROSSMAN, G. M. Ed. Economic Growth: Theory and
Evidence Vol. 1, Elgar Reference Collection. Intl. Library of
Critical Writings in Economics. Ashgate, Brookfield, VT, pp
426-457.
[46] TRAVIS, F. T. and ORME-JOHNSON, D. W.: 1990, ‘EEG
coherence and power during Yogic Flying’. International
Journal of Neuroscience, 54, pp1-12.
[47] ZELLNER, A.: 1988, ‘Causality and causal laws in
economics’, Journal of Econometrics, 39, pp 7-21.