ArticlePDF Available

Vertebrate-eating jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) revisited: consumption of geckos and bird hatchlings

Authors:
  • Florida State Collection of Arthropods

Abstract

In this paper, vertebrate predation by jumping spiders (Salticidae) was revisited, taking into account incidents of this kind recently published in the scientific literature or on the internet. Our study revealed that vertebrate predation by salticids is more widespread than previously thought, geographically and taxonomically. Roughly ninety percent of all reported cases refer to predation on anurans (Hylidae and Ranixalidae) and lizards (Dactyloidae and Gekkonidae) by salticids from the subfamily Salticinae (Hyllus spp., Phidippus spp., and an unidentified species presumably related to Hasarius Simon, 1871). In the remaining cases, salticids from the subfamily Salticinae (Paraphidippus cf. aurantius (Lucas, 1833) and Phidippus audax (Hentz, 1845)) were observed attacking bird hatchlings (families Paridae and Trochilidae), weighing 46 times more than the spiders. In two instances, the spiders were observed biting the hatchlings, but only in one single case, a salticid was seen feeding on a hatchling.
2021. Journal of Arachnology 49:397–401
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Vertebrate-eating jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) revisited:
consumption of geckos and bird hatchlings
Martin Nyffeler
1
,G.B. Edwards
2
and Raymond Arkin
3
:
1
Section of Conservation Biology, Department of
Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland; E-mail: martin.nyffeler@unibas.ch;
2
Curator Emeritus: Arachnida & Myriapoda, Florida State Collection of Arthropods, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA;
3
Former graduate student in Biology at Stanford University, CA 94305; present address: Eugene, OR 97404, USA
Abstract. In this paper, vertebrate predation by jumping spiders (Salticidae) was revisited, taking into account incidents
of this kind recently published in the scientific literature or on the internet. Our study revealed that vertebrate predation by
salticids is more widespread than previously thought, geographically and taxonomically. Roughly ninety percent of all
reported cases refer to predation on anurans (Hylidae and Ranixalidae) and lizards (Dactyloidae and Gekkonidae) by
salticids from the subfamily Salticinae (Hyllus spp., Phidippus spp., and an unidentified species presumably related to
Hasarius Simon, 1871). In the remaining cases, salticids from the subfamily Salticinae (Paraphidippus cf. aurantius (Lucas,
1833) and Phidippus audax (Hentz, 1845)) were observed attacking bird hatchlings (families Paridae and Trochilidae),
weighing 4–6 times more than the spiders. In two instances, the spiders were observed biting the hatchlings, but only in
one single case, a salticid was seen feeding on a hatchling.
Keywords: Large salticids, predation, Dactyloidae, Gekkonidae, Hylidae, Ranixalidae, bird hatchlings
https://doi.org/10.1636/JoA-S-20-090
Recently, Nyffeler et al. (2017) reported that Phidippus regius C. L.
Koch, 1846 occasionally captured small hylid frogs and anole lizards
in suburban and natural habitats in various parts of Florida, USA.
Using the same search method as Nyffeler et al. (2017), new evidence
of jumping spider predation on small vertebrates surfaced over the
past three years, which we present here.
This includes, among others, four previously unknown accounts of
predation on tree frogs (Hylidae) by Phidippus regius in Florida
(Table 1). Furthermore, an unidentified salticid spider (apparently
related to the genus Hasarius Simon, 1871) was seen capturing and
devouring a frog tadpole on the wet surface of a cliff near Satara,
Western Ghats, India (Fig. 1A; Ahmed et al. 2017). The tadpole (an
unspecified species in the genus Indirana; family Ranixalidae) was
about the size of the spider if the tadpole’s snout-vent length is
compared with the spider’s body length and about 4.5 times larger if
the spider’s body length is compared with the tadpole‘s total length
(Fig. 1A).
Furthermore, evidence of lizard predation by salticids from
geographic areas outside the USA is reported here, this time referring
to large spiders of the genus Hyllus C. L. Koch, 1846. A first incident
of this kind was witnessed and photographed in a wildlife
conservancy area in Hluhluwe, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (Anton
Roberts, pers. comm.). In this particular case, a female Hyllus
treleaveni Peckham & Peckham, 1902, positioned on the ducts of an
aquaponics system, fed on a Cape Dwarf Gecko Lygodactylus
capensis (Fig. 1B). A second incident of gecko predation by a Hyllus
jumping spider was recorded in the Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve,
Singapore (Nikita Hengbok, pers. comm.). There, a female Heavy
Jumping Spider, Hyllus diardi (Walckenaer, 1837), was observed
feeding on a gecko of the genus Hemidactylus (most likely the
Common House Gecko Hemidactylus frenatus) (Fig. 1C). These large
Hyllus spp. have a body length of 14–17 mm (Dippenaar-Schoeman
2014; Basumatary et al. 2018). Based on the photos, we estimated that
the gecko victims were 1.3–1.8 times larger than their salticid
predators if the geckos’ snout-vent length is compared with spider
body length, and 2.7–4 times larger if the geckos’ total length is
compared with spider body length. Furthermore, another incident of
lizard predation by Phidippus regius was photographed at Archbold
Biological Station near Lake Placid, Florida (Table 1). Using the
process of elimination, William Lamar (pers. comm.) and some other
herpetologists assumed the lizard in question may have been a
neonate Florida Scrub Lizard (Sceloporus woodi; Phrynosomatidae),
a species common at Archbold Biological Station; but other
herpetologists felt that the ID of this lizard would remain uncertain
because of the photo’s low resolution.
While monitoring a nest of the Violet-crowned Hummingbird
(Amazilia violiceps) in a greenhouse in San Juan del Rio, Mexico,
from August to October 2010, an incident of jumping spider
predation on one of the hatchlings was recorded (Fig. 1D;
Dom´
ınguez-Laso & Rosas-Espinoza 2017). A jumping spider (Para-
phidippus cf. aurantius (Lucas, 1833)) was found on top of the
hatchling biting it several times in the throat area and subsequently
biting it in some other body parts. A few minutes later the bird ceased
moving. The spider fed on the bird for at least 40 minutes, after which
time the observations were discontinued. The spider in question had a
body length of approximately 10 mm, while the bird measured 40
mm from the tip of the beak to the tip of the tail. Jumping spiders of
that size reach a body weight of 0.09 g (Carrel 1987), whereas
neonate hummingbirds weigh about 5–6 times as much (0.5 g; Rahn
1982). When the human observers returned to the scene four hours
later, the spider had disappeared leaving behind the hatchling carcass.
In 2017, the nest activity of the Black Capped Chickadee (Poecile
atricapillus) was monitored and recorded 24/7 during the May-August
nesting season by means of ‘‘nest cam’’ video cameras placed inside
and outside a nestbox attached to the outside of a residence in
Eugene, Oregon (R. Arkin, pers. obs.). The nest contained seven eggs
from which five healthy chicks hatched by mid-May. From then
onwards, the chicks were fed by the mother bird. During this period, a
peculiar incident occurred. In a video recording from 19 May, an
adult female jumping spider Phidippus audax (Hentz, 1845) could be
seen entering the nestbox. After briefly following an insect, the
intruder noticed and approached the chicks and rapidly inflicted one
//titan/production/a/arac/live_jobs/arac-49/arac-49-03/arac-49-03-05/layouts/arac-49-03-05.3d 11 November 2021 11:23 am Allen Press, Inc. Customer MS# MS#JoA-S-20-090Page 397
397
with a presumably venomous bite (Fig. 2; see video online at: https://
doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13585169). Only a short time later, the
mother bird returned and removed the intruder from the nestbox
(transporting it in its beak, as it seems without harming the spider).
The following day, one of the chicks was found dead while the other
four chicks were still alive. We assume that the chick died as a result
of the presumably venomous bite inflicted by the spider. The spider in
question had an estimated body length of 13.5 mm whereas the
dead hatchling had a length of 34 mm (from head to bottom not
including legs; R. Arkin, pers. obs.). Adult P. audax females reach a
body weight of 0.15–0.34 g (Carrel 1987; Anderson 1996), and a
neonate chickadee, on the other hand, may weight about 4 times as
much (0.85 g; Wetherbee 1961). Although this incident does not
qualify as actual predation event (because the spider was prevented
from eating the chick), the spider attacking and biting a hatchling
may be considered a possible predation attempt.
How common are incidents of spider predation on bird hatchlings?
In the past, multiple video recording studies on predation at nests of
small passerine and other small birds were conducted over time
periods of tens of thousands of hours with the purpose of identifying
the predators of hatchlings, but in none of these other video
recordings were attacks of jumping spiders or other spiders on bird
hatchlings witnessed (e.g., Thompson & Burhans 2003; Stake et al.
2004; Benson & Cartier 2010). One major reason for the near-absence
of spider attacks on hatchlings seems to be the fact that the nests
usually are well protected by the parent birds. Nevertheless, there are
a few anecdotal reports of predation on bird hatchlings by
mygalomorph spiders (Pocock 1899; Gudger 1925; McKeown 1952;
Wehtje 2007). In the vast majority of cases where bird predation by
spiders was reported, this referred to situations in which volant birds
got entangled in the large, strong orb-webs (0.5–1.5 m in diameter)
of large araneid and nephilid orb-weaving spiders (Brooks 2012;
Walther 2016; Smith et al. 2020).
Our study revealed that vertebrate predation by salticids is more
widespread than previously thought, geographically and taxonomi-
cally. Nevertheless, two-thirds of all cases of vertebrate predation (or
predation attempts) reported so far have been attributable to
Phidippus regius in Florida, USA (Table 1). With a body length of
2.2 cm, this species is one of the world’s largest salticids (weighing
0.5–1 g; Anderson 1996; Nyffeler et al. 2017), and among the .6,200
described salticid species, P. regius appears to be uniquely successful
in supplementing its arthropod diet by occasionally capturing small
anurans and lizards. The question arises whether large salticids have
some unique venom properties that allow for these types of oversized
prey to be taken, as is the case in the black widow spiders (Latrodectus
spp., Theridiidae) equipped with a neurotoxin (a-latrotoxin) specif-
ically targeting the vertebrate nervous system (see Escoubas et al.
2000). Unfortunately, salticid spider venoms are still largely
unexplored (Jessica Garb, pers. comm.; Escoubas et al. 2000;
Kuhn-Nentwig et al. 2011), so this question cannot be answered
with certainty. Nevertheless, the fact that the majority of the paralytic
activity observed/studied so far in spiders is due to the action of
peptides makes it highly likely that this is true in salticids as well
(Pierre Escoubas, pers. comm.). Furthermore, it is known that
salticids have fast-acting venoms (Grothaus 1967; Dom´
ınguez-Laso &
Rosas-Espinoza 2017). It can therefore be hypothesized that salticids
Table 1.—Eighteen incidents of vertebrate predation and one vertebrate predation attempt. P ¼Predation; A ¼Attempt (spider bit a hatchling
bird; consumption prevented by intervention by the mother bird).
Spider species Prey species Prey family
Type of
incident
Number of
incidents
Geographic
region Source
Hyllus diardi Hemidactylus (frenatus ?)Gekkonidae P 1 Singapore Nikita Hengbok
A
Hyllus treleaveni Lygodactylus capensis Gekkonidae P 1 South Africa Maritz & Maritz 2020
Paraphidippus cf. aurantius Amazilia violiceps Trochilidae P 1 Mexico Dom´
ınguez-Laso &
Rosas-Espinoza 2017
Phidippus audax Poecile atricapillus Paridae A 1 USA, Oregon R. Arkin, pers. obs.
Phidippus bidentatus Anolis sp. Dactyloidae P 1 Costa Rica Nyffeler et al. 2017
Phidippus regius Dryophytes femoralis Hylidae P 1 USA, Florida Nyffeler et al. 2017
Dryophytes squirellus Hylidae P 1þ3 USA, Florida Nyffeler et al. 2017;
Internet sources
B,C,D
N/A Hylidae P 1þ1 USA, Florida Nyffeler et al. 2017;
Internet source
E
Osteopilus septentrionalis Hylidae P 3 USA, Florida Nyffeler et al. 2017
Anolis carolinensis Dactyloidae P 1 USA, Florida Nyffeler et al. 2017
Anolis sagrei Dactyloidae P 1 USA, Florida Nyffeler et al. 2017
N/A (Sceloporus woodi ?) N/A (Phrynosomatidae ?) P 1 USA, Florida Internet source
F
Unknown salticid species
(apparently related to
Hasarius spp.)
Indirana sp. tadpole Ranixalidae P 1 India Ahmed et al. 2017
Total 19
A
Nikita Hengbok Hyllus diardi preying on a Hemidactylus (frenatus ?) in Singapore - Online at: http://ihengbok.blogspot.com/2011/05/my-
adventures-in-sungei-buloh-wetland.html Accessed 11 September 2020
B
George Grall Alamy images. A female regal jumping spider, Phidippus regius, preying on a squirrel tree frog, Hyla squirrella. - Image ID:
JDMBE2 Online at: https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-a-female-regal-jumping-spider-phiddipus-regius-preying-on-a-squirrel-146121530.
html Accessed 11 September 2020 / No longer accessible on 7 January 2021
C
Ellen Humble Female Phidippus regius eating a frog (Dryophytes squirellus?) in Alachua County, Florida. Online at: https://www.youtube.
com/watch?v¼vIG-mdh8zP0 Accessed 11 September 2020
D
Male Phidippus regius eating a frog (Dryophytes squirellus?) in a saw palmetto, Hillsborough River State Park, Florida. Online at: https://www.
youtube.com/watch?v¼Z63kBmDRTGk Accessed 11 September 2020
E
Phidippus regius eating a hylid frog in Florida. Online at: http://snap361.net/ig-post/1875148836249088810_197468702 No longer accessible on
11 September 2020
F
Phidippus regius eating a lizard http://snap361.com/ig-tag/archboldbiologicalstation/ No longer accessible on 23 October 2020
//titan/production/a/arac/live_jobs/arac-49/arac-49-03/arac-49-03-05/layouts/arac-49-03-05.3d 11 November 2021 11:23 am Allen Press, Inc. Customer MS# MS#JoA-S-20-090Page 398
398 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY
may use fast-acting peptides targeting the prey’s central and/or
peripheral nervous system as one of the components of their prey
capture strategy (Pierre Escoubas, pers. comm.). The amount of
venom for prey capture (i.e., the amount per bite) is likely to be
related to the size of the salticid predator, which might explain why
only large salticids are effective in capturing vertebrate prey.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Ansie Dippenaar-Schoeman (University of Pretoria) and
Dmitri Logunov (Manchester Museum, the University of Man-
chester) for identifying spiders from the genus Hyllus. Furthermore,
we wish to thank the herpetologists Aaron Bauer (Villanova
University), L. Lee Grismer (La Sierra University, Riverside,
California), Matthew Heinicke (University of Michigan Dearborn),
Kelvin K. P. Lim (National University of Singapore), Dennis R ¨
odder
(Zoologisches Forschungs Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn), and
Perry L. Wood, Jr. (Auburn University) for the ID of a gecko from
Singapore based on a photograph. We also thank William Lamar
(formerly University of Texas) and several other herpetologists for
commenting on a lizard photo taken near the Archbold Biological
Station, Florida. Appreciation is furthermore expressed to Pierre
Escoubas (University of Nice Sophia Antipolis) and Jessica Garb
Figure 1.—A. Unidentified salticid spider (apparently related to the genus Hasarius Simon, 1871) was seen capturing and devouring a frog
tadpole (Indirana sp., Ranixalidae) on the wet surface of a cliff near Satara, Western Ghats, India (photo by Sagar Satpute). B. Female Hyllus
treleaveni feeding on a gecko (Lygodactylus capensis) in South Africa (photo by Anton Roberts). C. Female Hyllus diardi feeding on a gecko
(Hemidactylus (frenatus?)) in Singapore (photo by Nikita Hengbok). D. Jumping spider (Paraphidippus cf. aurantius) is sucking out a Violet-
crowned Hummingbird hatchling (Amazilia violiceps) in a greenhouse in San Juan del Rio, Mexico (Photo by Matias Dominguez-Laso).
//titan/production/a/arac/live_jobs/arac-49/arac-49-03/arac-49-03-05/layouts/arac-49-03-05.3d 11 November 2021 11:23 am Allen Press, Inc. Customer MS# MS#JoA-S-20-090Page 399
NYFFELER ET AL.—VERTEBRATE-EATING JUMPING SPIDERS REVISITED 399
(University of Massachusetts) for sharing with us their expert
knowledge on spider toxins. Comments of Yael Lubin (Ben-Gurion
University) and an anonymous reviewer helped to improve the
manuscript. Finally, we wish to thank the photographers/authors
Javed Ahmed, Matias Dominguez-Laso, Nikita Hengbok, David
Hill, Anton Roberts, Ver´
onica Carolina Rosas-Espinoza, and Sagar
Satpute for permission to use their photos.
LITERATURE CITED
Ahmed J, Khalap R, Hill DE, Mohan K, Satpute S. 2017. Tadpole
predation by a jumping spider in Maharashtra (Araneae: Salt-
icidae). Peckhamia 159.1:1–2.
Anderson JF. 1996. Metabolic rates of resting salticid and thomisid
spiders. Journal of Arachnology 24:129–134.
Basumatary P, Das S, Kalita J, Brahma D. 2018. New record of
Hyllus diardi (Walckenaer 1837)(Araneae: Salticidae) from India.
Acta Arachnologica 67:35–37.
Benson TJ, Chartier NA. 2010. Harvestmen as predators of bird
nestlings. Journal of Arachnology 38:374–376.
Brooks DM. 2012. Birds caught in spider webs: a synthesis of
patterns. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 124:345–353.
Carrel JE. 1987. Heart rate and physiological ecology. Pp. 95–110. In
Ecophysiology of Spiders. (W Nentwig, ed.). Springer-Verlag,
Berlin-Heidelberg.
Dippenaar-Schoeman A. 2014. Field Guide to South African Spiders.
LAPA Publishers, Pretoria.
Dom´
ınguez-Laso M, Rosas-Espinoza VC. 2017. ¿Es la ara˜
naPara-
phidippus cf. aurantius (Araneae: Salticidae) depredadora o
carro˜
nera del colibr´
ıcorona violeta (Amazilia violiceps)(Gould,
1859)(Apodiformes: Trochilidae) en M´
exico? Acta Zool´
ogica
Mexicana 33:382–385.
Escoubas P, Diochot S, Corzo G. 2000. Structure and pharmacology
of spider venom neurotoxins. Biochimie 82:893–907.
Grothaus RH. 1967. Toxicity of Oklahoma spider (Araneae) venoms
using a new venom recovery and testing technique. PhD
Dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.
Gudger EW. 1925. Spiders as fishermen and hunters. Journal of the
American Museum of Natural History 25:261–275.
Kuhn-Nentwig L, St¨
ocklin R, Nentwig W. 2011. Venom composition
and strategies in spiders: is everything possible? Advances in Insect
Physiology 40:1–86.
Maritz RA, Maritz B. 2020. Sharing for science: high-resolution
trophic interactions revealed rapidly by social media. PeerJ
8:e9485.
McKeown KC. 1952. Australian Spiders. Angus and Robertson,
Sydney.
Nyffeler M, Edwards GB, Krysko KL. 2017. A vertebrate-eating
jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) from Florida, USA. Journal
of Arachnology 45:238–241.
Pocock RI. 1899. The genus Poecilotheria: its habits, history and
species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 3(7):82–96.
Rahn H. 1982. Comparison of embryonic development in birds and
mammals: birth weight, time, and cost. Pp. 124–137. In A
Companion to Animal Physiology. (Taylor CR, Johansen K, Bolis
L, eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Figure 2.—Adult female Phidippus audax jumping spider had entered a nestbox and was approaching a nest of Poecile atricapillus (Paridae)
containing five hatchlings. After briefly following an insect, the intruder noticed and approached the chicks and rapidly inflicted one with a
presumably venomous bite. A short time later, the mother bird returned and removed the spider from the nestbox. The following day, one of the
chicks was found dead and we assume that the chick may have died as a result of the spider bite (Photo by Raymond Arkin).
//titan/production/a/arac/live_jobs/arac-49/arac-49-03/arac-49-03-05/layouts/arac-49-03-05.3d 11 November 2021 11:23 am Allen Press, Inc. Customer MS# MS#JoA-S-20-090Page 400
400 JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY
Smith P, Lesterhuis AJ, Rodr´
ıguez O. 2020. The social spider
Parawixia bistriata (Rengger, 1836)(Araneidae) as a potentially
significant source of avian mortality in the Paraguayan Chaco.
Arachnology 18:436–439.
Stake MM., Faaborg J, Thompson FR. 2004. Video identification of
predators at golden-cheeked warbler nests. Journal of Field
Ornithology 75:337–344.
Thompson, FR, Burhans DE. 2003. Predation of songbird nests
differs by predator and between field and forest habitats. Journal of
Wildlife Management 67:408–416.
Walther BA. 2016. Birds caught in spider webs in Asia. Avian
Research 7:16.
Wehtje W. 2007. Trapdoor spider (Cyrtaucheniidae; Aptostichus)
depredates western snowy plover chick (Charadrius alexandrinus).
Southwestern Naturalist 52:435–436.
Wetherbee DK. 1961. Observations on the developmental condition
of neonatal birds. American Midland Naturalist 65:413–435.
Manuscript received 16 November 2020, revised 29 Jan 2021.
//titan/production/a/arac/live_jobs/arac-49/arac-49-03/arac-49-03-05/layouts/arac-49-03-05.3d 11 November 2021 11:24 am Allen Press, Inc. Customer MS# MS#JoA-S-20-090Page 401
NYFFELER ET AL.—VERTEBRATE-EATING JUMPING SPIDERS REVISITED 401
... As they compete for the same prey, they are also intraguild predators (Nyffeler 1999;Saqib et al. 2021). Most salticids are 'generalist' predators that hunt a variety of preymainly insectsof similar size to themselves, but are also capable of hunting much larger prey, including documented instances of predation on lizards and frogs (Nyffeler et al. 2021). In contrast, several 'specialist' species, discussed below, have behavioral preferences and specialized hunting tactics for a narrow range of prey. ...
Article
Full-text available
The largest family of spiders, jumping spiders (Salticidae), is known for performing complex visually mediated predatory and courtship behavior. As cursorial predators, they rely on their sensory systems to identify objects at a distance. Based on these assessments, salticids perform flexible and target-specific behavioral sequences which demonstrate a high level of cognitive processing. Recent studies have highlighted the role of other sensory modalities in these processes, such as chemoreception and mechanoreception, and elucidated the visual cues used for object identification, including motion, color, contrast, and shape-based cues. Until recently, sensory modalities other than vision were largely overlooked, but current advances in technology now allow us to probe their sensory and cognitive capabilities, as well as how these are shaped by experience. In this review, I provide an overview of current knowledge of salticid behavior and the sensory systems underpinning this behavior, and highlight areas in need of further research. This review focusses on our understanding of salticid communication, parental behavior, personality, antipredator behavior, and diet, as well as habitat selection. I argue that a historical vision-based focus on a small number of species due to their coloration or their unusual behavior provides a springboard for a deeper understanding of the general cognitive and sensory attributes that have evolved in this lineage, of which we yet have much to learn.
Article
According to a recent global literature survey, a total of 39 out of the 129 known spider families (30%) contain species capable of capturing vertebrate prey. The finding that the percentage of spider families engaged in vertebrate predation is so high is novel. Two groups of vertebrate-eating spiders are distinguished: habitual vertebrate-eaters vs. occasional vertebrate-eaters. The habitual vertebrate-eaters comprise ten spider families (Araneidae, Atracidae, Ctenidae, Lycosidae, Nephilidae, Pisauridae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae, Trechaleidae, and Sparassidae) to which can be attributed 91% of all reported vertebrate predation incidents. The habitual vertebrate-eaters have evolved prey-capture adaptations such as (1) sufficient physical strength coupled with large body size, (2) the use of potent venoms, and (3) the use of highly efficient prey-catching webs. By contrast, unexpected feeding on vertebrates by the occasional vertebrate-eaters (i.e., Actinopodidae, Agelenidae, Amaurobiidae, Anyphaenidae, Barychelidae, Clubionidae, Corinnidae, Ctenizidae, Cyrtaucheniidae, Deinopidae, Desidae, Dipluridae, Eresidae, Filistatidae, Gnaphosidae, Haplonoproctidae, Linyphiidae, Liocranidae, Miturgidae, Oxyopidae, Pholcidae, Porrhothelidae, Salticidae, Selenopidae, Sicariidae, Sparassidae, Tetragnathidae, and Thomisidae) might be considered as chance events that took place when a tiny vertebrate crossed the path of an opportunistic spider. For a few families (e.g., Idiopidae) their status as habitual or occasional vertebrate predators is still unclear. In conclusion, our survey unveiled a large number of spider taxa previously not anticipated to feed on vertebrate prey. These findings improve our general understanding of spider feeding ecology and provide a first assessment of the significance of vertebrate prey as a food source for spiders.
Article
Full-text available
Zdunek, P., Bandara, S.K. 2022. First report of predation on the common house gecko Hemidactylus frenatus (Duméril & Bibron, 1836) by a wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae) in Sri Lanka. Herpetology Notes 15: 377-378
Book
Full-text available
Thoroughly revised and updated, this long-awaited new edition of Field Guide to the Spiders of South Africa remains the most comprehensive guide to South African spiders published to date. It features over 780 of the more common spider species encountered in the veld and in homes and gardens, as well as representative species from some of the rarer spider families. • ‘Quick Keys’ to the 72 South African spider families provide a useful starting point to identification. • Succinct genus and species accounts cover identifying characteristics, breeding, behaviour, distribution and conservation status. • Colour photographs and/or illustrations as well as distribution maps support each entry. • Introductory chapter discusses spider morphology, spider life cycle, the functions of silk, as well as spider collection techniques. • Section on venom identifies species that pose a danger to humans, unpacks neurotoxic and cytotoxic venom, and details the symptoms and treatment of spider bites
Article
Full-text available
Discrete, ephemeral natural phenomena with low spatial or temporal predictability are incredibly challenging to study systematically. In ecology, species interactions, which constitute the functional backbone of ecological communities, can be notoriously difficult to characterise especially when taxa are inconspicuous and the interactions of interest (e.g., trophic events) occur infrequently, rapidly, or variably in space and time. Overcoming such issues has historically required significant time and resource investment to collect sufficient data, precluding the answering of many ecological and evolutionary questions. Here, we show the utility of social media for rapidly collecting observations of ephemeral ecological phenomena with low spatial and temporal predictability by using a Facebook group dedicated to collecting predation events involving reptiles and amphibians in sub-Saharan Africa. We collected over 1900 independent feeding observations using Facebook from 2015 to 2019 involving 83 families of predators and 129 families of prey. Feeding events by snakes were particularly well-represented with close to 1,100 feeding observations recorded. Relative to an extensive literature review spanning 226 sources and 138 years, we found that social media has provided snake dietary records faster than ever before in history with prey being identified to a finer taxonomic resolution and showing only modest concordance with the literature due to the number of novel interactions that were detected. Finally, we demonstrate that social media can outperform other citizen science image-based approaches (iNaturalist and Google Images) highlighting the versatility of social media and its ability to function as a citizen science platform.
Article
Full-text available
Five cases of bird entrapment in the social webs of Parawixia bistriata (Araneidae: Araneinae: Araneini) are reported from the Paraguayan Chaco. These are the first reports of avian entrap-ment for this species, and add one new family (Thraupidae) and four new species to the global biological inventory of bird species caught in spider webs. The wing chord and masses of the largest two species, Tyrannus melancholicus (Tyrannidae) and Columbina picui (Columbidae) greatly exceed the maximum reported for other Neotropical species. It is argued that possibility of mortality from entrapment is not merely a matter of mor-phometry as has been previously suggested, but includes other factors such as spider species, silk type, and area of entangle-ment. A possible temporal relationship between the growth and life history of this spider and the potential for entrapment is postulated. It is proposed that increased deforestation in the Paraguayan Chaco could lead to an increase in avian entrapment in this webs of this species.
Article
Full-text available
Hyllus diardi (Walckenaer 1837) is recorded for the first time from India on the basis of female specimens collected from Assam. Description of the specimen is given with figures of its body and genitalia. This species is distinguished from its congeners by the distinctive large hairy body, unique abdominal patterns and structure of epigyne.
Article
Full-text available
The salticid spider Phidippus regius C.L. Koch, 1846 is documented preying on small frogs (Hyla spp., Osteopilus septentrionalis) and lizards (Anolis carolinensis and Anolis sagrei) in Florida, USA. Female as well as male P. regius were engaged in feeding on this type of vertebrate prey. A total of eight incidents of P. regius devouring vertebrates have been witnessed in seven Florida counties. Furthermore, we report an incident of a large unidentified Phidippus sp. (possibly P. bidentatus F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1901) preying on an immature anole lizard in Costa Rica. P. regius, otherwise known to feed almost exclusively on insects and spiders, is one of the world's largest salticid spiders reaching a maximum recorded body length of 2.2 cm. Most other salticid spiders appear to be too small in body size to overcome vertebrate prey. Vertebrate predation by salticid spiders has not been previously documented in the scientific literature. Together with Salticidae, spiders from 27 of 114 families (24%) are currently known to occasionally consume vertebrate prey.
Article
Full-text available
RESUMEN. Aunque la depredación activa sobre una variedad depresas es el comportamiento general descrito de las arañas saltarinas, se han registrado otros comportamientos como el ser carroñeras. Las arañas han sido reportadas como depredadoras de aves. A pesar de que, en algunos casos, no está claro si es un evento de depredación o de carroñería. Este es el primer registro formal en México de la araña Paraphidippus cf. aurantius alimentándose del colibrí corona violeta(Amazilia violiceps).
Article
Full-text available
A recent global review of birds caught in spider webs reported only three Asian cases. Given this surprisingly low number, I made a concerted effort to obtain additional Asian cases from the literature, the internet, and field workers. I present a total of 56 Asian cases which pertain to 33 bird species. As in the global dataset, mostly small bird species were caught in spider webs, with a mean body mass of 17.5 g and a mean wing chord length of 73.1 mm. Consequently, birds with a body mass >30 g were very rarely caught. This Asian review corroborates the global review that smaller birds are more likely to be caught and that Nephila spiders are most likely to be the predators. Continuous monitoring of spider webs is recommended to ascertain the frequency of these events.
Article
Rates of metabolism of jumping and crab spiders were evaluated to determine if life-style characteristics are associated with rates of energy expenditure in these 'sit-and-wait' predators. Resting rates of oxygen consumption were measured under standardized conditions in nine species of salticid and three species of thomisid spiders. These rates and those previously reported ranged from 50-70% of that expected for their size in these families. They are similar to those of other families of spiders with similar modes of prey capture, life span, and distribution. No significant differences in this measure were detected between the two families.
Article
This review on all spider venom components known by the end of 2010 bases on 1618 records for venom compounds from 174 spider species (= 0.41% of all known species) belonging to 32 families (= 29% of all existing spider families). Spiders investigated for venom research are either big (many mygalomorph species, Nephilidae, Ctenidae and Sparassidae) or medically important for humans (e.g. Loxosceles or Latrodectus species). Venom research widely ignored so far the two most species-rich families (Salticidae and Linyphiidae) and strongly neglected several other very abundant families (Araneidae, Lycosidae, Theridiidae, Thomisidae and Gnaphosidae).We grouped the known 1618 records for venom compounds into six categories: low molecular mass compounds (16 % of all compounds), acylpolyamines (11 %), linear peptides (6 %), cysteine-knotted mini-proteins (60 %), neurotoxic proteins (1 %) and enzymes (6 %). Low molecular mass compounds are known from many spider families and contain organic acids, nucleosides, nucleotides, amino acids, amines, polyamines, and some further substances, many of them acting as neurotransmitters. Acylpolyamines contain amino acids (Araneidae and Nephilidae) or not (several other families) and show a very high diversity within one species. Linear peptides, also called cytolytic, membranolytic or antimicrobial, exert a highly specific structure and are so far only known from Ctenidae, Lycosidae, Oxyopidae and Zodariidae. Cysteine-knotted mini-proteins represent the majority of venom compounds because research so far focused on them. They probably occur in most but not all spider families. Neurotoxic proteins so far are only known from theridiid spiders. Enzymes had been neglected for some time but meanwhile it becomes obvious that they play an important role in spider venoms. Sixteen enzymes either cleave polymers in the extracellular matrix or target phospholipids and related compounds in membranes. The overall structure of these compounds is given and the function, as far as it is known, is described. Since several of these component groups are presented in one average spider venom, we discuss the known interactions and synergisms and give reasons for such a functional redundancy. We also discuss main evolutionary pathways for spider venom compounds such as high variability among components of one group, synergistic interactions between cysteine-knotted mini-proteins and other components (low molecular mass compounds and linear peptides), change of function from ion-channel acting mini-proteins to cytolytic effects and replacement of mini-proteins by linear peptides, acylpolyamines, large proteins or enzymes. We also add first phylogenetic considerations.
Article
We monitored 67 Golden-cheeked Warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia) nests with infrared video cameras and time-lapse recorders to identify predators. Rat snakes (Elaphe spp.) were the most frequent predators, depredating 12 nests and capturing three adult females. A variety of avian predators depredated seven nests, including three American Crows (Corvus brachyrynchos), two Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater), one Western Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma californica), and one Cooper's Hawk (Accipiter cooperii). Fox squirrels (Sciurus niger) depredated four nests and were the only mammalian predators recorded. Post-outcome recordings (i.e., after young fledged or nests failed) revealed western coachwhips (Masticophis flagellum testaceus), mice (Peromyscus sp.), and Greater Roadrunners (Geococcyx californianus) as potential predators, though they were not recorded at active nests. Video proved to be an effective method of monitoring Golden-cheeked Warbler nests, because all but one predator was identified and only two nests (3%) were abandoned.