ArticlePDF Available

Call to join the decentralized science movement

Portugal: female
science leaders could
speed up change
Faculty members at Portuguese
universities have not
unanimously welcomed the
government’s programmes to
attract young researchers and
provide them with more stable
employment opportunities.
These funding schemes,
including the Foundation for
Science and Technology’s
investigator programme and
its Individual Call to Scientific
Employment Stimulus, are
allowing early-career scientists
to build strong research teams
and to acquire international
In my experience, opposition
stems mainly from university
professors who consider that
the programmes give their
junior colleagues an unfair
advantage. The researchers
who benefit from the schemes
have no compulsory teaching
duties. And the incomes of those
who achieve senior research
positions can rapidly equal or
even surpass the earnings of
Call to join the
science movement
The decentralized science
(DeSci) movement aims to
harness new technologies
such as blockchain and ‘Web3
to address some important
research pain points, silos
and bottlenecks. However, it
is happening with little input
from established academic
Example projects include
efficient peer-to-peer data
storage (using file systems such
as IPFS;, token-
based incentive mechanisms
for peer review (B. Trovò and
N.Massari Euro-Par 2020; 2021),
and improved mechanisms
for funding research
( and
replicating studies (go.nature.
This work is spearheaded by
online communities in a loose
network of science-focused
decentralized autonomous
organizations (DAOs) such as
Ants-Review, Blockchain for
Science, DeSciDAO, Opscientia,
Planetary Resilience DAO,
ResearchHub and VitaDAO. In
October 2021, the community-
led Web3 conference LisCon
featured DeSci speakers.
The movement is not
dominated by any one field, but
it will benefit greatly at this early
stage from the participation
of scientists from diverse
disciplines. Those interested
can join or initiate a DAO. A
thorough review of the DeSci
landscape and its implications
would promote open discussion
on the impact of these new
technologies on scientific
Sarah Hamburg London, UK.
S.H. declares competing interests.
Are female science
leaders judged more
harshly than men?
Study it.
The open letter from 145 leading
female scientists calling on
Germany’s Max Planck Society
to identify and address issues
that might have contributed to
the sanctioning or downgrading
of highly successful female
directors (see Nature 600,
20; 2021) raises an important
question. Are there systemic
biases at play in many such
institutions that affect even
those women who make it to the
end of the leaky pipeline?
We have a good
understanding of the obstacles
women face early in their
scientific careers. Much less
is known about what happens
to the women who reach the
highest ranks of research (see One of
the few existing studies suggests
that women foresee spending
shorter periods in such roles
than men (P.O’Connor Gender
Educ. 27, 3, 304–319; 2015).
Another shows that female and
male workers experience much
larger negative effects from
criticism delivered by a female
manager than by a male one (see
Are senior female scientists
judged more harshly than
men? Do they fear allegations
of leadership shortcomings
and threats of sanctions more
than men do? In our view, every
institution (including Nature)
should survey women and men
in top science positions about
such issues urgently.
Martina Schraudner Fraunhofer
Center for Responsible Research
and Innovation, Berlin, Germany.
Elizabeth Pollitzer Portia Ltd,
London, UK.
Materials scientist Liliana Tomé, winner of a 2021 LOréal Portugal
Medal of Honor for Women in Science.
established professors.
Most university professors
in Portugal are men, whereas
the majority of the junior
researchers hired under these
schemes happen to be women.
Such employment stimuli are
important because they help
to provide young women with
the support they need to reach
senior positions, encouraging
more of them into scientific
careers. This could enable
Portuguese universities to
achieve gender equality at last.
Paulo Cartaxana University
of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Nature | Vo  |  December  | 221
Readers respond
... T he autonomous science, particularly decentralized autonomous organizations (DAO)-based decentralized science (DeSci), is emerging as an important movement in research and development in recent years. [1][2][3] To investigate its potential significance, on March 21 and 30, 2022, our AI Expert of the IEEE Intelligent Systems has held two decentralized hybrid workshops (DHWs) to address various issues of DeSci and its impact on the existing ecology and future evolution of scientific activities and operations. Specifically, what is DeSci? ...
... From a broader perspective, DeSci is the emergence of collective desires to improve the research and development establishments, which are expected to be transformed by intelligent technologies into more effective and efficient organizations with increased ability for sciences to fulfill their mandates and align with human values. [1][2][3][4][5] In traditional centralized science (CeSci), centralized agents, such as government institutions, philanthropic foundations, private businesses, or universities, have been organized and operated for pragmatic rather than purely epistemic purposes, where techno-scientific institutions have a core mandate of helping outside institutions in their pragmatic endeavors with an overarching goal of accumulating epistemic value along this direction. Figure 2 presents the framework for a DeSci model derived from the initial idea in Wang's work. 1 Clearly, DeSci differs from CeSci in terms of its tools, structure, governance, incentives, organization, operations, and norms, or more generally, in terms of its research and development ecology for knowledge discovery and utilization. ...
Full-text available
This article discusses the impact and significance of the autonomous science movement and the role and potential uses of intelligent technology in DAO-based decentralized science (DeSci) organizations and operations. What is DeSci? How does it relate the science of team science? What are its potential contributions to multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and/or transdisciplinary studies? Does it have any correspondence to the social movement organizations in traditional social sciences or the cyber movement organizations in the new digital age? Particularly, issues on DeSci to current professional communities, such as IEEE and its societies, conferences, and publications, are addressed, and the effort for the framework and process of DAO-based DeSci for free, fair, and responsibility sensitive sciences is reviewed.
... Instead, the management is often exceedingly centralized: only a handful of influential scientists are highly recognized as leaders of successful projects. Decentralized science (DeSci) is an emerging movement that proposes to build a shared infrastructure for disseminating, assessing, funding, crediting, and storing data and knowledge using blockchain technologies [Hamburg, 2021;]. It aims to create an ecosystem where all the researchers are motivated to share their data and receive credit for their effort while allowing everyone open access to research materials using crypto-technologies such as non-fungible tokens (NFTs). ...
... It mainly completes the acquisition, scheduling, and allocation of resources, such as collecting, storing, and protecting information, as well as coordinating and controlling concurrent activities and many other tasks. This layer mainly aims to improve the SE reliability through new technologies [56], such as federated ecology, federated data, blockchain intelligence, smart contracts, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) [57], and decentralized autonomous societies (DASs), which greatly facilitate the deployment of foundation models tasks. ...
Full-text available
Foundation models are used to train a broad system of general data to build adaptations to new bottlenecks. Typically, they contain hundreds of billions of hyperparameters that have been trained with hundreds of gigabytes of data. However, this type of black-box vulnerability places foundation models at risk of data poisoning attacks that are designed to pass on misinformation or purposely introduce machine bias. Moreover, ordinary researchers have not been able to completely participate due to the rise in deployment standards. This study introduces the theoretical framework of scenarios engineering (SE) for building accessible and reliable foundation models in metaverse, namely“, SE-enabled foundation models in metaverse.” Particularly, the research framework comprises a six-layer architecture (infrastructure layer, operation layer, knowledge layer, intelligence layer, management layer, and interaction layer), which can provide controllability, trustworthiness, and interactivity for the foundation models in metaverse. This creates closed-loop, virtual–real, and human–machine environments that provides the best indices and goals for the foundation models, which allows us to fully validate and calibrate the corresponding models. Then, examples of use cases from the automotive industry are listed to provide transparency on the possible use and benefits of our approach. Finally, the open research topics of related frameworks are discussed.
... With the improvement of smart contract platforms, such as Ethereum and the maturity of decentralized governance tools, the application of DAOs is becoming increasingly diversified and shows a trend of integration with noncrypto industries. At present, DAOs have been applied in many fields, such as finance and venture capital, social network [37], [38], entertainment, science, etc., which led to the birth of decentralized finance (DeFi), such as Uniswap and MakerDAO, decentralized funding, such as VentureDAOs and GrantDAOs, decentralized social network, such as community DAOs and social DAOs, decentralized entertainment, such as CollectionDAOs and GameFi, and Decentralized science (DeSci) [39], [40], [41]. In addition, DAOs also have great potential in many fields, such as organization management, emergency command, and network governance. ...
Full-text available
Empowered by blockchain and Web3 technologies, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) are able to redefine resources, production relations, and organizational structures in a revolutionary manner. This article aims to reanalyze DAOs from the perspectives of organization and operation, and provide a more precise definition of DAOs as DAOs and Operations. Based on this, the fundamental principles and requirements of DAOs are explained, while the infrastructure based on cyber–physical–social system (CPSS) and parallel intelligence, as well as the supporting technologies, such as digital twins, metaverse, and Web3, are discussed. Besides, a five-layer intelligent architecture is presented, and the closed-loop equation and new function-oriented intelligent algorithms are also proposed. Moreover, the governance mechanisms from the individual, organizational and social perspectives are discussed, and the incentive mechanisms for the human, robot, and digital human are analyzed. This article can be regarded as a stepping stone for further research and developments of DAOs.
... In this perspective, academic institutions and governing bodies can build on blockchain technology and the early momentum generated by the decentralized science (DeSci) movement to implement a transformative solution to help trace securely the deterioration in working conditions, in particular, the average standard of overall well-being across research institutions, in a transparent and coordinated way. DeSci has recently emerged as both a scientific community movement and an alternative scientific infrastructure built on top of the blockchain to improve the modern organisation of science by addressing some important research pain points, silos, and bottlenecks (Hamburg, 2021). From a technical standpoint, blockchain is a distributed ledger technology that empowers anyone with an internet connection to transfer any valuable digital asset, such as currency, software code, document, or survey answers, with unmatched security and integrity (Casino et al., 2019). ...
Full-text available
Academic staff’s working conditions have been deteriorating for years. In particular, the reduced availability of both research funding and permanent research positions has continuously led to insidious competition and intense stress among academics. Whereas governing bodies have made significant attempts to narrow pervasive social inequalities in the distribution of research funding within the scientific community, they have not truly taken into account the importance of the academics’ overall well-being in the development of more sustainable financing of academic researchers. This originates not only from the complexity to develop comprehensive models reflecting staff’s overall well-being in the academic environment, but also from the limited access to reliable and immutable data that transparently account for the staff’s direct experience. In this context, blockchain technology can push further the use of more transparent survey data collection and record-keeping that can help mitigate the systematic bias inherent to the centralized nature of traditional auditing. We discuss how research institutions and governing bodies can build on blockchain technology and the early momentum generated by the decentralized science (DeSci) movement to implement the future-proof research funding chain that values overall well-being across academia in a transparent and coordinated way.
Briefing: An investigation and outline of MetaControl and DeControl in Metaverses for control intelligence and knowledge automation are presented. Prescriptive control with prescriptive knowledge and parallel philosophy is proposed as the starting point for the new control philosophy and technology, especially for computational control of metasystems in cyber-physical-social systems. We argue that circular causality, the generalized feedback mechanism for complex and purposive systems, should be adapted as the fundamental principle for control and management of metasystems with metacomplexity in metaverses. Particularly, an interdisciplinary approach is suggested for MetaControl and DeControl as a new form of intelligent control based on five control metaverses: Meta Verses, MultiVerses, InterVerses, TransVerse, and Deep Verses.
Decentralized science (DeSci) is a hot topic emerging with the development of Web3 or Web3.0 and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and operations. DeSci fundamentally differs from the centralized science (CeSci) and Open Science (OS) movement built in the centralized way with centralized protocols. It changes the basic structure and legacy norms of current scientific systems via reshaping the cooperation mode, value system, and incentive mechanism. As such, it can provide a viable path for solving bottleneck problems in the development of science, such as oligarchy, silos, and so on, and make science more fair, free, responsible, and sensitive. However, DeSci itself still faces many challenges, including scaling, balancing the quality of participants, system suboptimal loops, lack of accountability mechanism, and so on. Taking these into consideration, this article presents a systematic introduction of DeSci, proposes a novel reference model with a six-layer architecture, addresses the potential applications, and also outlines the key research directions in this emerging field. This article is committed to providing helpful guidance and reference for future research efforts on DeSci.
Centralization has dominated classic scientific, social, and economic developments. Decentralization has also received increasing attention in management, decision, governance, and economics, despite its incomparability in AI. Going beyond centralized and distributed AI, this article reviews and delineates the conceptual map, research issues, and technical opportunities of decentralized AI and edge intelligence. The complementarity and metasynthesis between centralized and decentralized AI are also elaborated. We further assess where decentralized AI and edge intelligence can enable and promote smart blockchain, Web3, metaverse and decentralized science disciplinarily, technically, practically, and more broadly.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.