ArticlePDF Available

Public health priority setting: A case for priority to the worse off in well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic

December 2021
Etikk i Praksis

DOI:10.5324/eip.v15i2.4097

License
CC BY 4.0

Project: SEVPRI - Severity and Priority Setting in Health care

Authors:

Sindre August Horn

University of Bergen

Akershus universitetssykehus

University of Bergen

Carl Tollef Solberg

University of Oslo

In Norway, priority for health interventions is assigned on the basis of three official criteria: health benefit, resources, and severity. Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have mainly happened through intersectoral public health efforts such as lockdowns, quarantines, information campaigns, social distancing and, more recently, vaccine distribution. The aim of this article is to evaluate potential priority setting criteria for public health interventions. We argue in favour of the following three criteria for public health priority setting: benefit, resources and improving the well-being of the worse off. We argue that benefits and priority to the worse off may reasonably be understood in terms of individual well-being, rather than only health, for public health priority setting. We argue that lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic support our conclusions. Keywords: COVID-19, Prioritarianism, Priority Setting, Public Health, Severity

Content uploaded by Carl Tollef Solberg

Content may be subject to copyright.

03.01.2022, 12:24PDF.js viewer

Side 1 av 12https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/plugins/generic/pdfJsViewer/pdf.js/web/…p%2Fetikk_i_praksis%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F4097%2F4096%2F17849

03.01.2022, 12:24PDF.js viewer

Side 2 av 12https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/plugins/generic/pdfJsViewer/pdf.js/web/…p%2Fetikk_i_praksis%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F4097%2F4096%2F17849

03.01.2022, 12:24PDF.js viewer

Side 3 av 12https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/plugins/generic/pdfJsViewer/pdf.js/web/…p%2Fetikk_i_praksis%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F4097%2F4096%2F17849

03.01.2022, 12:24PDF.js viewer

Side 4 av 12https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/plugins/generic/pdfJsViewer/pdf.js/web/…p%2Fetikk_i_praksis%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F4097%2F4096%2F17849

03.01.2022, 12:24PDF.js viewer

Side 5 av 12https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/plugins/generic/pdfJsViewer/pdf.js/web/…p%2Fetikk_i_praksis%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F4097%2F4096%2F17849

03.01.2022, 12:24PDF.js viewer

Side 6 av 12https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/plugins/generic/pdfJsViewer/pdf.js/web/…p%2Fetikk_i_praksis%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F4097%2F4096%2F17849

03.01.2022, 12:24PDF.js viewer

Side 7 av 12https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/plugins/generic/pdfJsViewer/pdf.js/web/…p%2Fetikk_i_praksis%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F4097%2F4096%2F17849

03.01.2022, 12:24PDF.js viewer

Side 8 av 12https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/plugins/generic/pdfJsViewer/pdf.js/web/…p%2Fetikk_i_praksis%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F4097%2F4096%2F17849

03.01.2022, 12:24PDF.js viewer

Side 9 av 12https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/plugins/generic/pdfJsViewer/pdf.js/web/…p%2Fetikk_i_praksis%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F4097%2F4096%2F17849

03.01.2022, 12:24PDF.js viewer

Side 10 av 12https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/plugins/generic/pdfJsViewer/pdf.js/web…p%2Fetikk_i_praksis%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F4097%2F4096%2F17849

03.01.2022, 12:24PDF.js viewer

Side 11 av 12https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/plugins/generic/pdfJsViewer/pdf.js/web…p%2Fetikk_i_praksis%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F4097%2F4096%2F17849

03.01.2022, 12:24PDF.js viewer

Side 12 av 12https://www.ntnu.no/ojs/plugins/generic/pdfJsViewer/pdf.js/web…p%2Fetikk_i_praksis%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F4097%2F4096%2F17849

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.

Project

SEVPRI - Severity and Priority Setting in Health care

The aim of SEVPRI is to achieve a better public discussion about priority setting. It is about understanding how peoples’ values impact their views on priority setting in health care, and about tra nslating this into criteria for priority setting that achieve the ideal of democratic, open, and fair priority setting in health care. ... [more]

Project

Evaluating Deaths

How to evaluate deaths in global health

Project

Statistical criterion for diagnosing menstrually related migraine

This project aims to improve diagnosis of menstrually related migraine (MRM) - the condition where women's migraine patterns appear to coincide with their menstrual cycle. As the physiopatology of MRM remains largely unknown (although partial hypotheses, mainly regarding the hormonal variations during the days surrounding the menstrual bleeding, have shown promise), the diagnosis is currently set by the '2/3'-criterion: migraine attacks occuring on two out of three 'menstrual windows' (the five days centered on the first day of bleeding). This criterion seem both insensitive and unspecific for true associations, therefore new methods are devloped for the diagnosis of MRM on this project. ... [more]

Project

Stroke-Mod

Article

Full-text available

National identification, a social cure for COVID-19? Evidence from 67 countries

May 2021 · International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Background: Social distancing and mass quarantines were implemented worldwide in response to the current COVID-19 pandemic. Prior research has shown that such measures bear negative consequences for population mental health and well-being. Conversely, a growing body of evidence suggests that feeling positively identified with a group is associated with physical and mental health benefits. Aims: ... [Show full abstract] This study tested whether national identification could promote wellbeing and physical health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: We used survey data conducted among 67 countries (N = 46,450). Results: Mixed-model analyses revealed that national identity was associated with wellbeing – despite adjustment on social belonging, COVID-19 perceived risk, exposure and ideology. This effect did not extend to physical health. Conclusions: These results suggest that the mere feeling of belonging to a national group may have mental health benefits. We discuss the implications of our findings within the social cure framework and their relevance for population mental health under COVID-19

Article

Full-text available

Er covid-19 alvorlig? Det norske alvorlighetskriteriet for helseprioriteringer i møte med en pandemi

May 2021 · Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning

Koronapandemien har synliggjort nødvendigheten av prioriteringer i helsetjenesten vår. Helseprioriteringer i Norge skal gjøres etter de tre kriteriene nytte, ressurs og alvorlighetsgrad. Nytte-og ressurskriteriene utgjør til sammen et kostnadseffektivitetskriterium: Høyere prioritet tilfaller tiltak som skaper mye helse med få ressurser. Alvorlighets-kriteriet innebaerer at en mer alvorlig ... [Show full abstract] tilstand kan og skal prioriteres høyere enn kostnadseffektiviteten alene tilsier. I denne artikkelen undersøker vi det norske alvorlighetskriteriet for helseprioriteringer i møte med koronaepidemien i Norge. Vi beskriver utviklingen av alvorlighetskriteriet i den norske prioriteringsdiskursen. Videre diskuterer vi hvordan koronaepidemien fremhever uenigheter og tvetydigheter rundt begrepet «alvorlighet» hva gjelder dødsrisiko, komorbiditet og hastegrad. Vi drøfter også hvordan den norske pandemiberedskapen passer inn i dette landskapet og etterlyser en klarere forståelse av alvorlighet i skillet mellom behandling og forebygging av sykdom. Til sist drøfter vi om det norske alvorlighetskriteriet for helseprioriteringer også kan være relevant for prioriteringer utenfor helsevesenet.

Article

Full-text available

The disvalue of death in the global burden of disease

October 2017 · Journal of Medical Ethics

In the Global Burden of Disease study, disease burden is measured as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). The paramount assumption of the DALY is that it makes sense to aggregate years lived with disability (YLDs) and years of life lost (YLLs). However, this is not smooth sailing. Whereas morbidity (YLD) is something that happens to an individual, loss of life itself (YLL) occurs when that ... [Show full abstract] individual’s life has ended. YLLs quantify something that involves no experience and does not take place among living individuals. This casts doubt on whether the YLL is an individual burden at all. If not, then YLDs and YLLs are incommensurable. There are at least three responses to this problem, only one of which is tenable: a counterfactual account of harm. Taking this strategy necessitates a re-examination of how we count YLLs, particularly at the beginning of life.

Article

Full-text available

Consistency is not overrated

July 2019 · Journal of Medical Ethics

In a recent paper—The disvalue of death in the global burden of disease—we question the commensurability of the two components of the disability-adjusted life year (DALY)—years lived with disability (YLDs) and years of life lost (YLLs)—and offer a tentative solution to this problem. In an exciting and constructive reply—Is consistency overrated?—philosopher S Andrew Schroeder argues that our ... [Show full abstract] concern about the DALY may be missing the mark by accepting the DALY as what he refers to as an index reflecting nothing ‘beyond the importance we place in each (DALY component)’. According to Schroeder, our consistency requirement is then made redundant. In the article, we respond to Schroeder. https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2019/07/30/medethics-2019-105662

Article

Full-text available

Should we discount future health benefits? Pro et contra (English translation)

September 2020 · Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift

The aim of this article is to examine the arguments for and against the practice of discounting future health benefits. A more general, but related, question is whether we should discount future well-being. We begin with an explanation of what discounting means and how it is used as a method in the evaluation of health interventions. Next, we consider the most central arguments for and against ... [Show full abstract] discounting future health benefits. This includes well-known arguments such as the argument of diminishing marginal returns, the risk argument, the delay argument, and the consistency argument. We also discuss pure time preferences. In addition, we consider less debated arguments, including the instrumental argument and the argument for distributive justice, as well as discontinuous discounting, as an alternative form of discounting. We conclude openly and leave it to you as the reader to reflect further on this important issue.

Last Updated: 03 Dec 2022