ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Acromegaly and the Colon: Scoping Beyond the Pituitary

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Acromegaly is a complex endocrinological disorder commonly caused by hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH) typically due to pituitary gland tumors. Patients with acromegaly who are successfully treated and biochemically managed have a reasonably average life expectancy. However, it causes a cascade of multi-systemic involvement throughout the patient's life, including cardiovascular, neuropsychiatric, respiratory, metabolic, neurological, neoplastic, and gastrointestinal involvement, resulting in a higher rate of hospitalization, lower quality of life, and a shorter life expectancy. Although cardiovascular complications are the primary cause of death in patients with acromegaly, malignancy is now emerging as a major killer in these individuals. Colorectal carcinoma has been reported to be prevalent in acromegaly individuals. This review article has compiled studies to demonstrate a link between acromegaly and colorectal neoplasia, intending to provide a strong foundation for their clinical relationship. This article has summarised a potential pathogenic mechanism and provided insights into the clinical presentation of such patients. Furthermore, this article has provided a brief overview of current screening recommendations for colorectal neoplasia in acromegaly patients.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Review began 11/23/2021
Review ended 11/26/2021
Published 11/29/2021
© Copyright 2021
Patel et al. This is an open access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0.,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution,
and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original author and source are credited.
Acromegaly and the Colon: Scoping Beyond the
Pituitary
Gautami S. Patel , Idan Grossmann , Kevin Rodriguez , Mridul Soni , Pranay K. Joshi , Saawan C. Patel
, Devarashetty Shreya , Diana I. Zamora , Ibrahim Sange
1. Internal Medicine, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, IND 2. Research, Medical University of Silesia in
Katowice Faculty of Medical Sciences Katowice, Katowice, POL 3. Research, Universidad Americana (UAM) Facultad de
Medicina, Managua, NIC 4. Research, Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Government Medical College, Mandi, IND 5. Research,
Department of Medicine, B.J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND 6. Medicine, Pramukhswami Medical College,
Karamsad, IND 7. Internal Medicine, Gandhi Medical College, Secunderabad, IND 8. General Medicine, Universidad de
Ciencias Médicas Andrés Vesalio Guzman, San José, CRI 9. Research, K. J. Somaiya Medical College, Mumbai, IND
Corresponding author: Gautami S. Patel, sonargautami2512@gmail.com
Abstract
Acromegaly is a complex endocrinological disorder commonly caused by hypersecretion of growth hormone
(GH) typically due to pituitary gland tumors. Patients with acromegaly who are successfully treated and
biochemically managed have a reasonably average life expectancy. However, it causes a cascade of multi-
systemic involvement throughout the patient’s life, including cardiovascular, neuropsychiatric, respiratory,
metabolic, neurological, neoplastic, and gastrointestinal involvement, resulting in a higher rate of
hospitalization, lower quality of life, and a shorter life expectancy. Although cardiovascular complications
are the primary cause of death in patients with acromegaly, malignancy is now emerging as a major killer in
these individuals. Colorectal carcinoma has been reported to be prevalent in acromegaly individuals. This
review article has compiled studies to demonstrate a link between acromegaly and colorectal neoplasia,
intending to provide a strong foundation for their clinical relationship. This article has summarised a
potential pathogenic mechanism and provided insights into the clinical presentation of such patients.
Furthermore, this article has provided a brief overview of current screening recommendations for colorectal
neoplasia in acromegaly patients.
Categories: Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism, Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology
Keywords: growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor 1, colorectal carcinoma, colorectal polyps, acromegaly
Introduction And Background
Acromegaly is an endocrinological disorder characterized by an abnormally elevated growth hormone (GH)
level in the serum predominantly caused by a pituitary adenoma [1,2]. Pierre Marie, a French neurologist,
coined the term “acromegaly” to describe this disease’s morphological features [3]. It is a rare disease with
an incidence rate of 0.2 to 1.1 per 100,000 people and a prevalence rate ranging between 2.8 and 13.7 cases
per 100,000 people. Most patients are diagnosed in their 50s with an average diagnostic delay of 4.5-5
years [4]. Ninety-five percent of the cases are sporadic, and 50% of the cases are present in childhood as a
part of familial diseases such as familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA), X linked acrogigantism (XLAG),
multiple endocrinal neoplasia-1 and 4 (MEN-1 and MEN-4), Carney complex, McCune-Albright syndrome,
neurofibromatosis or ‘3PAs’ syndrome [5]. When GH enters blood circulation, it signals the liver to produce
another hormone, called insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) which mediates many GH effects [6]. While
gigantism occurs due to excess GH levels before epiphyseal closure leading to an abnormal linear overgrowth
of bones, acromegaly manifests after the epiphyseal closure presenting with morphological features like
broad hands, feet, and fingers, wide and thick nasal bones, prominent zygomatic arch, bulging forehead
occasionally leading to frontal bossing, swollen lips with marked facial lines due to soft tissue thickening,
dental malocclusion due to mandibular overgrowth with prognathism along with maxillary widening leading
to tooth separation [6,7]. In addition, visual problems and headaches are believed to be due to the mass
effect of pituitary overgrowth [7]. Besides the musculoskeletal system, GH and IGF-1 have several systemic
manifestations, including cardiovascular, neuropsychiatric, respiratory, metabolic, neurological, neoplastic,
and gastrointestinal complications [7,8].
Although the clinical presentation of acromegaly is relatively apparent with regards to the physical
appearance of the patients, the workup usually begins with an elevated IGF-1 level as it is an indicator of GH
function. It is confirmed with an unsuppressed GH concentration after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)
[9]. Radiological investigation such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often necessary to look for the
pituitary adenoma [9]. In certain rare clinical scenarios, Computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax and
abdomen is done to localize towards an ectopic source of secretion of GH or growth hormone-releasing
hormone (GHRH) [10]. Even though transsphenoidal surgery is considered the mainstay of therapy, medical
management with drugs like octreotide (somatostatin analog), cabergoline (dopamine agonists),
pegvisomant (GH receptor antagonist) has been shown to help keep IGF-1 levels in the normal range [11-13].
Acromegaly is a complex disorder that manifests with multiple system involvement, out of which
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9
Open Access Review
Article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20018
How to cite this article
Patel G S, Grossmann I, Rodriguez K, et al. (November 29, 2021) Acromegaly and the Colon: Scoping Beyond the Pituitary. Cureus 13(11):
e20018. DOI 10.7759/cureus.20018
cardiovascular complications (congestive heart failure) are the main culprit behind the mortality in these
patients [14]. One of the lesser-explored areas in the subject of acromegaly is that of colonic involvement,
which can manifest with conditions such as colorectal polyps and carcinoma [15]. These conditions exhibit a
subtle clinical course. Most of them have an asymptomatic and insidious presentation, resulting in an
average of 12 years of delay in diagnosis [1]. This could result in the development of colon polyps and
possibly allow for pre-malignant lesions to transform into cancer, further amplifying the patient’s mortality.
This review article aims to: 1. Underline the pathogenesis and explore the clinical relationship between
acromegaly and the development of colonic complications; and 2. Emphasize the importance of early
screening and diagnosis of these conditions.
Review
Acromegaly and colorectal polyps
Acromegaly is most commonly caused by an anterior pituitary somatotrophic tumor that secretes GH, also
known as somatotropin [1]. GH is a protein hormone that binds to its membrane-bound growth hormone
receptor (GHR) on the liver [1,2]. Activated GHR, in turn, activates the enzyme Janus kinase 2 (JAK-2), a
cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase that phosphorylates tyrosine residues both within the JAK-2 enzyme and GHR
[1,2,16]. That serves as binding sites for a variety of signaling molecules leading to alteration of gene
expression [16]. As a result, the liver secretes IGF-1, also known as somatomedin, which binds to its receptor
on the colonic epithelium and serves its role (Figure 1) [1,2]. The amounts of insulin-like growth factor
binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) and IGFBP protease in the blood affect the circulating levels of IGF-1. IGFBP-3
is produced by the liver alongside IGF-1 and works to inhibit IGF-1 activity by binding to it and lowering its
free levels [16]. Tissue produces IGFBP protease, which cleaves IGFBP-3, prevents its binding to IGF-1, and
balances the free IGF-1 levels [17]. The balance of all these three, IGF-1, IGFBP-3, and IGFBP protease,
determines free levels of IGF-1 in the blood (Figure 1) [18].
2021 Patel et al. Cureus 13(11): e20018. DO I 10.7759/cureus.20018 2 of 9
FIGURE 1: A summary of the possible pathogenesis of acromegaly that
results in colorectal complications.
GH: Growth Hormone
IGFBP-3: Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3
IGF-1: Insulin-like Growth Factor-1
Since IGF-1 receptors are expressed in both normal and malignant colorectal epithelia, when activated by
IGF-1, the receptor-ligand complex suppresses apoptosis and enables progression through the cell cycle by
activating signal transduction pathways critical for cell growth and survival (Figure 1) [17,19,20]. Extensive
epithelial proliferation and a wide zone of proliferation found in the colon of acromegalic patients are
related to the levels of GH and IGF-1 [21]. As a result, IGF-1 has the ability to affect both pre-malignant and
neoplastic phases. Furthermore, IGF-1 stimulates the synthesis of vascular endothelial growth factor, an
angiogenic agent that promotes the development of blood vessels to support the colon cancer cell lines
(Figure 1) [22]. Additionally, IGF-1 receptors are upregulated in the colon of acromegaly patients, which is
vital to the survival of the mutated cells, giving legitimacy to the link between the IGF axis and neoplasia
[23]. Above mentioned might be one of the probable pathogenic mechanisms by which IGF-1 contributes to
the development and maintenance of colonic polyps in acromegaly patients.
Gonzalez et al. conducted a case-control nested in a cohort study in 2017 further to support this putative
function of IGF-1 in polyp development. The study revealed that high IGF-1 levels are significantly related to
the formation of colonic polyps, indicating that acromegaly patients are at a high risk of acquiring colonic
polyps [24]. Since colonic polyps can cause various abdominal symptoms, identifying individuals solely
2021 Patel et al. Cureus 13(11): e20018. DO I 10.7759/cureus.20018 3 of 9
based on their clinical presentation can be challenging. Wei et al. conducted retrospective research at
Beijing children’s hospital to determine the incidence of colon polyp symptoms in 487 patients. The study
discovered that rectal bleeding was the most common symptom in most patients, with additional symptoms
such as stomach discomfort, polyp protrusion from the anus, anemia, and diarrhea occurring in a few with
the common site of polyps being the rectosigmoid colon, and the number of polyps being single or multiple
[25]. However, in patients with acromegaly, colonic polyps could present somewhat differently. A study done
in 2020 by Inayet et al. suggested that the most cited issue in patients with acromegaly is functional
constipation. Such abdominal symptoms in patients with acromegaly may serve as a red flag for the
physician, prompting him or her to suspect and begin screening [26].
Ochiai et al. published a case-control study in 2020 with 178 cases and 356 age and gender-matched
controls to investigate the incidence of colon polyps in acromegaly patients. Following colonoscopy, 66.8%
of acromegaly patients were discovered to have polyps, but only 24.2% of controls (healthy individuals) were
found to have polyps (p=0.001). Acromegalic patients exhibited a higher number and larger size of polyps.
The most prevalent location was the rectosigmoid area, indicating that individuals with acromegaly are at an
increased risk of developing colorectal polyps than the general population (Table 1) [27]. In Turkey, Iliaz et
al. conducted a case-control study in 2018 with 134 acromegaly patients as cases and 134 age- and gender-
matched irritable bowel syndrome patients as controls. Following a colonoscopy and histopathological
examination, it was discovered that the acromegaly patients had a substantially greater incidence of all
types of colonic polyps (p=0.012). Histopathological examination revealed a higher incidence of hyperplastic
polyps (p=0.004), indicating that the incidence of hyperplastic polyps was increased in Turkish individuals
with active acromegaly (Table 1) [28]. Another study showed similar results as the studies mentioned above.
It was conducted in Poland in 2010 with 31 acromegaly patients with a mean age of 46.3 +/- 11.9 years.
Colon polyps were found in 13 individuals (41.9%) following colonoscopy. The results heavily suggested that
colon polyp frequency was linked to the duration of uncontrolled acromegaly (p=0.01) (Table 1) [29]. It is
also worth mentioning that, apart from polyps, colonic diverticula have also been reported in patients with
acromegaly, which can be explained by high IGF-1 levels in these patients [30].
Reference Design Population Method Diagnostic
modality Results Conclusion
Ochiai et al.
(2020) [27]
Retrospective
matched
case control
Patients with
acromegaly diagnosed
between april 2008
and september 2016
in toranomon hospital,
Japan.
Cases-178
Controls-
356
(Matched for
age and
gender)
Colonoscopy
66.8% of cases and 24.2% (p=
0.001) of controls were found
to have polyps. The size and
number were larger in the
acromegaly (case) group.
Patients with
acromegaly are at
greater risk of
developing
colorectal polyps.
Iliaz et al.
(2018) [28]
Case control
study Turkey
Cases-134
Controls-
134
Colonoscopy
followed by
histopathological
examination
The incidence of polyps in the
acromegaly group was higher
(p= 0.012) with an enhanced
incidence of hyperplastic
polyps (p= 0.004).
Turkish people with
acromegaly had a
higher incidence of
hyperplastic polyps.
Krzentowska et
al. (2010)
[29]
Poland
Total
patients-31.
Mean age-
46.3 +/- 11.9
years
Colonoscopy 13 individuals (41.9%) were
found to have polyps.
The length of
uncontrolled
acromegaly plays a
role in the
development of
colon polyps (p=
0.01)
TABLE 1: Summary of included studies revealing a clinical correlation between acromegaly and
colorectal polyps
These studies give compelling evidence for a favorable clinical relationship between acromegaly and
colorectal polyps. Colonoscopy and CT colonography are the two screening modalities. Once detected,
polyps are very well treated with endoscopic management modalities such as polypectomy, endoscopic
submucosal dissection (ESD), and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) if detected at an early stage.
Endoscopic management modalities are used to treat polyps based on their size and histological features
[31]. Polyps less than 5mm in size are too tiny to be surgically removed; instead, a yearly colonoscopy for
three years is recommended [31,32]. They can potentially grow into life-threatening carcinoma if left
untreated for an extended period. With the use of regular screening, polyps can be detected earlier and
treated before developing into carcinomas.
2021 Patel et al. Cureus 13(11): e20018. DO I 10.7759/cureus.20018 4 of 9
Acromegaly and colorectal carcinoma
The IGF-1 axis plays a vital role in carcinogenesis by promoting cellular turnover, leading to the
accumulation of molecular alterations that influence colon carcinoma development [33]. Colon carcinoma
can also be driven by RAS protein mutations that lead to increased IGF-1 signal transduction pathway
activity, elevating gene expression and mitogenicity, promoting the adenoma-carcinoma sequence
[34,35]. Tripkovic et al. conducted a study and demonstrated that individuals with colon carcinoma had
elevated levels of circulating IGF-1 [36]. Zhang et al., on the other hand, conducted a similar study to
investigate the role of IGF-1 and its receptor (IGF1R) in colorectal carcinoma and discovered comparable
results that high circulating IGF1 levels and mucosal IGF1R expression may play a significant role in both
the formation and development of colorectal carcinoma and may encourage the growth and malignant
transformation of adenomatous polyps [37].
Battistone et al. recently published a case-control study that comprised 70 acromegaly patients and 128
healthy controls. Advanced neoplastic lesions were found in 22 (31.4%) of patients and nine (7.0%) of
controls (p=0.0001, odds ratio (OR): 6.06); advanced adenomas were found in 18 (27.3%) and nine (7.0%) of
patients and controls, respectively (p=0.0006, OR: 4.57), and colorectal carcinomas were discovered in four
(5.7%) and zero (0.0%) of patients and controls, respectively (p=0.0063), indicating that acromegaly patients
had a higher risk of developing colon cancer (Table 2) [38]. In 2018, Dal et al. published a cohort study and a
meta-analysis of the literature to reinforce the cohort research’s findings. The study tracked a cohort of 529
acromegaly patients from the date of diagnosis with acromegaly until the first occurrence of a cancer
diagnosis, death, emigration, or end of the study period, whichever came first, and discovered 81 cases of
various malignancies (standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9 to 1.4).
Colorectal cancer had a SIR of 1.4 (95% CI: 0.7 to 2.6). These results were backed up by a meta-analysis of 23
studies producing overall cancer SIR of 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2 to 1.8) with an increased SIR for colorectal cancer of
2.6 (95% CI: 1.7 to 4.0), showing modestly higher incidence rates in acromegaly patients, but it also
highlighted the possibility of selection bias in certain previous studies (Table 2) [39]. Terzolo et al. assessed
the SIRs of several kinds of cancer in acromegaly in 2017 using a multi-centered cohort analysis of 1512
acromegaly patients. After a 10-year follow-up, 124 individuals were diagnosed with cancer, with a
substantially higher incidence of colon cancer (SIR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.07-2.58, p=0.022), demonstrating a
modest increase in cancer risk in acromegaly patients (Table 2) [40]. Wolinski et al. performed a case-control
study in 2016; 200 patients and 145 controls were used in the study. Colon cancer was found in four (2.0%)
of acromegaly patients and zero in the control group (p=0.14), suggesting a heightened risk of cancer in the
acromegaly group (Table 2) [41].
2021 Patel et al. Cureus 13(11): e20018. DO I 10.7759/cureus.20018 5 of 9
Reference
(year)
Design
Population Method Results Conclusion
Battistone
et al.
(2021) [38]
Case-
control
study
Patients with
acromegaly from
15 Buenos Aires
hospitals.
Cases- 70 Controls- 128 All of
them underwent colonoscopy
and histopathological
examination.
1.Advanced neoplastic lesions seen in:
Cases-22 (31.4%) Controls-nine (7.0%)
(p=0.0001, OR: 6.06) 2.Advanced
adenomas: Cases-18 (27.3%) Controls-
nine (7.0%) (p=0.0006, OR: 4.57)
3.Advanced carcinomas: Cases-four
(5.7%) Controls-zero (0.0%) (p=0.0063)
There is a
high risk of
colon
carcinoma in
acromegalic
patients.
Dal et al.
(2018) [39]
Cohort
study
Population
comprised the
cumulative
population of
Denmark.
Recruited data
from the Danish
National Patient
Registry.
A cohort of 529 patients of
acromegaly was followed from
the date of diagnosis with
acromegaly until the first
occurrence of a cancer
diagnosis, death, emigration, or
end of the study period,
whichever came first.
SIR for colorectal cancer: 1.4 (95% CI: 0.7
to 2.6)
The
elevated
incidence
rate of
colorectal
cancer in
acromegaly
patients.
Terzolo et
al. (2017)
[40]
Cohort
study Italy
Assessed SIR of colorectal
cancer in 1512 cases of
acromegaly who were followed
up for 10 years.
Incidence of colorectal cancer (SIR- 1.67;
95% CI: 1.07-2.58, p=0.022)
Risk of
colorectal
cancer in
acromegaly
patients is
moderately
elevated
Wolinski
al. (2016)
[41]
Case-
control
study
Cases- 200 Controls- 145 Colon cancer was found in four (2.0%)
cases and zero controls (p=0.14).
There is a
high risk of
colon
malignancy
in
acromegaly
patients.
TABLE 2: Summary of included studies revealing a clinical correlation between acromegaly and
colorectal carcinoma
OR: Odds Ratio
SIR: Standardized Incidence Ratio
CI: Confidence Interval
Kurimuto et al. conducted research in 2008 to investigate the prevalence of benign and malignant tumors in
individuals with acromegaly. A retrospective chart analysis was done on 140 patients with active acromegaly
who had visited an outpatient clinic (male/female 54/86, age 55 +/- 25-year, range 21-86). In 10 individuals,
colon cancer was discovered. In comparison to the general population, the SIRs for colon cancer in
acromegaly patients was 17.4 (95% CI: 4.74-44.55) for females and 19.0 (95% CI: 5.18-48.64) for males,
indicating a substantial risk of colon cancer in acromegaly patients [42]. In 2008, Rokkas et al. published a
meta-analysis assessing the probability of colorectal neoplasia in acromegaly patients. The
study analyzed nine trials that included 701 patients with acromegaly and 1573 controls. The pooled
findings revealed that individuals with acromegaly had an elevated risk of colon cancer (OR: 4.351; 95% CI:
1.533-12.354; Z=2.762, p=0.006), consistent with the higher risk of colorectal cancer reported by the research
mentioned above [43]. Terzolo et al. conducted a cross-sectional study with 235 acromegaly patients in Italy
in 2005. Acromegaly patients’ colonoscopic findings were compared to 233 individuals with nonspecific
symptoms. Ten patients (4.3%) and two control participants (0.9%) had carcinoma (OR: 4.9; range-1.1-22.4),
with a higher probability of colonic neoplasia occurring in younger acromegaly patients compared to age-
matched controls, implying that acromegaly carries a moderate but definite elevated risk of colonic cancer
that develops at a relatively young age than in the general population [44]. Matano et al. conducted a
comparative investigation and found a similar outcome. In 2005, 19 acromegaly patients (cases) and 76 age,
gender, and smoking status matched controls enrolled in the case-control study. The prevalence of cancer
2021 Patel et al. Cureus 13(11): e20018. DO I 10.7759/cureus.20018 6 of 9
was more significant in acromegaly patients than in controls (p=0.05, OR: 9.8), demonstrating a link between
acromegaly and colon carcinoma [45].
These findings provide convincing evidence for a favorable clinical connection between acromegaly and
colorectal carcinoma. Having stated that, screening for colon pathologies in acromegaly patients becomes
critical. The objectives of screening are to detect dysplasia before it advances to carcinoma, detect carcinoma
before clinical symptoms appear, and prevent it from metastasizing. Direct visualization screening using
colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy, and CT colonography are considered as more effective modalities
for identifying colon neoplasia [46]. Alternative stool-based screening procedures that are less effective, such
as fecal immunochemical testing and fecal occult blood tests, stool deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) tests
combined with fecal immunochemical tests, are generally avoided in these people [47]. Screening
colonoscopy should not be postponed in individuals with acromegaly under the age of 45, which is the age at
which screening is suggested in the average-risk group according to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
(USPSTF) [48]. There is substantial agreement across endocrine scientific societies on needing a colonoscopy
when acromegaly is diagnosed [49-52]. Repeat colonoscopy should be performed every five years if a colonic
adenoma is discovered during screening and if acromegaly is not adequately biochemically managed. The
timeframe for repeat colonoscopy changes according to the levels of GH and IGF-1. Follow-up colonoscopy
should be conducted with stricter compliance in such patients than in the general population. On the other
hand, surveillance colonoscopy is recommended every 10 years when acromegaly is biochemically
controlled [47].
Limitations
Potential confounding factors for the development of colorectal neoplasia such as age, gender, insulin
resistance, circulating insulin levels, diabetes mellitus status, hypertension status, body mass index, high
fatty diet, family history, and geographical distribution have not been taken into account in all of the
studies presented.
Conclusions
According to the studies covered in this article, despite patients with acromegaly having significant
morphological alterations, the condition is also a causal factor for colorectal neoplasia such as colorectal
polyps and colorectal carcinoma. IGF-1 is responsible for the majority of the pathological changes that take
place in acromegaly. Keeping the aforementioned facts in mind, we attempted to emphasize colorectal
neoplasia in patients with acromegaly in this review article to raise awareness among physicians to begin
screening for colorectal neoplasia using direct visualization methods such as colonoscopy and CT
colonography at the moment the patient is diagnosed with acromegaly. When such pathologies are identified
at an early pre-malignant stage with the aid of screening methods, grave sequelae such as colonic carcinoma
can be prevented with effective management, which has the potential to improve the quality of life and
extend the life expectancy of acromegalic patients. We believe that this article can serve as a foundation for
researchers to delve deeper into colorectal complications of acromegaly and explore the pathophysiology of
this illness in depth. However, we believe that the link between acromegaly and colorectal neoplasia
requires further large-scale research studies to be conducted while keeping confounding variables in mind in
order to establish appropriate screening and management guidelines.
Additional Information
Disclosures
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the
following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from
any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have
no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might
have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no
other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
References
1. Colao A, Grasso LF, Giustina A, Melmed S, Chanson P, Pereira AM, Pivonello R: Acromegaly. Nat Rev Dis
Primers. 2019, 5:20. 10.1038/s41572-019-0071-6
2. Petrossians P, Daly AF, Natchev E, et al.: Acromegaly at diagnosis in 3173 patients from the Liège
Acromegaly Survey (LAS) Database. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2017, 24:505-18. 10.1530/ERC-17-0253
3. de Herder WW: The history of acromegaly. Neuroendocrinology. 2016, 103:7-17. 10.1159/000371808
4. Lavrentaki A, Paluzzi A, Wass JA, Karavitaki N: Epidemiology of acromegaly: review of population studies .
Pituitary. 2017, 20:4-9. 10.1007/s11102-016-0754-x
5. Gadelha MR, Kasuki L, Korbonits M: The genetic background of acromegaly . Pituitary. 2017, 20:10-21.
10.1007/s11102-017-0789-7
6. Chanson P, Salenave S: Acromegaly. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008, 3:17. 10.1186/1750-1172-3-17
7. Vilar L, Vilar CF, Lyra R, Lyra R, Naves LA: Acromegaly: clinical features at diagnosis . Pituitary. 2017, 20:22-
32. 10.1007/s11102-016-0772-8
8. Melmed S: Medical progress: acromegaly. N Engl J Med. 2006, 355:2558-73. 10.1056/NEJMra062453
2021 Patel et al. Cureus 13(11): e20018. DO I 10.7759/cureus.20018 7 of 9
9. Katznelson L: Diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly . Growth Horm IGF Res. 2005, 15:S31-5.
10.1016/j.ghir.2005.06.007
10. Doga M, Bonadonna S, Burattin A, Giustina A: Ectopic secretion of growth hormone-releasing hormone
(GHRH) in neuroendocrine tumors: relevant clinical aspects. Ann Oncol. 2001, 2:89-94.
10.1093/annonc/12.suppl_2.s89
11. Melmed S, Bronstein MD, Chanson P, et al.: A consensus statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes .
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018, 14:552-61. 10.1038/s41574-018-0058-5
12. Campana C, Corica G, Nista F, et al.: Emerging drugs for the treatment of acromegaly . Expert Opin Emerg
Drugs. 2020, 25:409-17. 10.1080/14728214.2020.1819983
13. Cámara R, Venegas E, García-Arnés JA, et al.: Treatment adherence to pegvisomant in patients with
acromegaly in Spain: PEGASO study . Pituitary. 2019, 22:137-45. 10.1007/s11102-019-00943-1
14. Lombardi G, Galdiero M, Auriemma RS, Pivonello R, Colao A: Acromegaly and the cardiovascular system .
Neuroendocrinology. 2006, 83:211-7. 10.1159/000095530
15. Kasuki L, Rocha PD, Lamback EB, Gadelha MR: Determinants of morbidities and mortality in acromegaly .
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019, 63:630-7. 10.20945/2359-3997000000193
16. Rechler MM: Growth inhibition by insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3--what's IGF got to do
with it?. Endocrinology. 1997, 138:2645-7. 10.1210/endo.138.7.5355
17. Jones JI, Clemmons DR: Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: biological actions . Endocr
Rev. 1995, 16:3-34. 10.1210/edrv-16-1-3
18. Giovannucci E: Insulin, insulin-like growth factors and colon cancer: a review of the evidence . J Nutr. 2001,
131:3109S-20S. 10.1093/jn/131.11.3109S
19. Guo YS, Narayan S, Yallampalli C, Singh P: Characterization of insulinlike growth factor I receptors in
human colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 1992, 102:1101-8.
20. Koenuma M, Yamori T, Tsuruo T: Insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 stimulate proliferation of
metastatic variants of colon carcinoma 26. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1989, 80:51-8. 10.1111/j.1349-
7006.1989.tb02244.x
21. Cats A, Dullaart RP, Kleibeuker JH, Kuipers F, Sluiter WJ, Hardonk MJ, de Vries EG: Increased epithelial cell
proliferation in the colon of patients with acromegaly. Cancer Res. 1996, 56:523-6.
22. Warren RS, Yuan H, Matli MR, Ferrara N, Donner DB: Induction of vascular endothelial growth factor by
insulin-like growth factor 1 in colorectal carcinoma. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271:29483-8.
10.1074/jbc.271.46.29483
23. Baserga R: The insulin-like growth factor I receptor: a key to tumor growth? . Cancer Res. 1995, 55:249-52.
24. Gonzalez B, Vargas G, Mendoza V, Nava M, Rojas M, Mercado M: The prevalence of colonic polyps in
patients with acromegaly: a case-control, nested in a cohort colonoscopic study. Endocr Pract. 2017, 23:594-
9. 10.4158/EP161724.OR
25. Wei C, Dayong W, Liqun J, Xiaoman W, Yu W, Xiaohong Q: Colorectal polyps in children: a retrospective
study of clinical features and the value of ultrasonography in their diagnosis . J Pediatr Surg. 2012, 47:1853-
8. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.05.024
26. Inayet N, Hayat J, Bano G, Poullis A: Gastrointestinal symptoms in acromegaly: a case control study . World J
Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2020, 11:17-24. 10.4292/wjgpt.v11.i2.17
27. Ochiai Y, Inoshita N, Iizuka T, Nishioka H, Yamada S, Kitagawa M, Hoteya S: Clinicopathological features of
colorectal polyps and risk of colorectal cancer in acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol. 2020, 182:313-8.
10.1530/EJE-19-0813
28. Iliaz R, Dogansen SC, Tanrikulu S, et al.: Predictors of colonic pathologies in active acromegaly: single
tertiary center experience. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2018, 130:511-6. 10.1007/s00508-018-1367-3
29. Krzentowska A, Gołkowski F, Bałdys-Waligórska A, Hubalewska-Dydejczyk A: [Gastrointestinal tract polyps
in acromegaly patients]. Przegl Lek. 2010, 67:1266-9.
30. Wassenaar MJ, Cazemier M, Biermasz NR, et al.: Acromegaly is associated with an increased prevalence of
colonic diverticula: a case-control study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010, 95:2073-9. 10.1210/jc.2009-1714
31. Tanaka S, Saitoh Y, Matsuda T, et al.: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of
colorectal polyps. J Gastroenterol. 2015, 50:252-60. 10.1007/s00535-014-1021-4
32. Onoue K, Yamada H, Miyazaki T: Natural history of colorectal diminutive polyps with 5 mm or less-
prospective study. J Gastrointest Cancer Screen. 2008, 46:729-34. 10.1111/den.12263
33. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, et al.: Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development . N
Engl J Med. 1988, 319:525-32. 10.1056/NEJM198809013190901
34. Jhun BH, Meinkoth JL, Leitner JW, Draznin B, Olefsky JM: Insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I signal
transduction requires p21ras. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269:5699-704.
35. Bos JL: The ras gene family and human carcinogenesis . Mutat Res. 1988, 195:255-71. 10.1016/0165-
1110(88)90004-8
36. Tripkovic I, Tripkovic A, Strnad M, Capkun V, Zekan L: Role of insulin-like growth factor-1 in colon
cancerogenesis: a case-control study. Arch Med Res. 2007, 38:519-25. 10.1016/j.arcmed.2007.01.012
37. Zhang R, Xu GL, Li Y, et al.: The role of insulin-like growth factor 1 and its receptor in the formation and
development of colorectal carcinoma. J Int Med Res. 2013, 41:1228-35. 10.1177/0300060513487631
38. Battistone MF, Miragaya K, Rogozinski A, et al.: Increased risk of preneoplastic colonic lesions and
colorectal carcinoma in acromegaly: multicenter case-control study. Pituitary. 2021, 24:96-103.
10.1007/s11102-020-01090-8
39. Dal J, Leisner MZ, Hermansen K, et al.: Cancer incidence in patients with acromegaly: a cohort study and
meta-analysis of the literature . J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018, 103:2182-8. 10.1210/jc.2017-02457
40. Terzolo M, Reimondo G, Berchialla P, et al.: Acromegaly is associated with increased cancer risk: a survey in
Italy. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2017, 24:495-504. 10.1530/ERC-16-0553
41. Wolinski K, Stangierski A, Dyrda K, et al.: Risk of malignant neoplasms in acromegaly: a case-control study . J
Endocrinol Invest. 2017, 40:319-22. 10.1007/s40618-016-0565-y
42. Kurimoto M, Fukuda I, Hizuka N, Takano K: The prevalence of benign and malignant tumors in patients
with acromegaly at a single institute . Endocr J. 2008, 55:67-71. 10.1507/endocrj.k07e-010
2021 Patel et al. Cureus 13(11): e20018. DO I 10.7759/cureus.20018 8 of 9
43. Rokkas T, Pistiolas D, Sechopoulos P, Margantinis G, Koukoulis G: Risk of colorectal neoplasm in patients
with acromegaly: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2008, 14:3484-9. 10.3748/wjg.14.3484
44. Terzolo M, Reimondo G, Gasperi M, et al.: Colonoscopic screening and follow-up in patients with
acromegaly: a multicenter study in Italy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 90:84-90. 10.1210/jc.2004-0240
45. Matano Y, Okada T, Suzuki A, Yoneda T, Takeda Y, Mabuchi H: Risk of colorectal neoplasm in patients with
acromegaly and its relationship with serum growth hormone levels. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005, 100:1154-60.
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40808.x
46. Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, Marmo R: Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for
detection--systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2011, 259:393-405. 10.1148/radiol.11101887
47. Terzolo M, Puglisi S, Reimondo G, Dimopoulou C, Stalla GK: Thyroid and colorectal cancer screening in
acromegaly patients: should it be different from that in the general population?. Eur J Endocrinol. 2020,
183:D1-D13. 10.1530/EJE-19-1009
48. Colorectal Cancer: Screening . (2021). Accessed: October 22, 2021:
https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/colorectal-cancer-screening.
49. Katznelson L, Laws ER Jr, Melmed S, Molitch ME, Murad MH, Utz A, Wass JA: Acromegaly: an endocrine
society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014, 99:3933-51. 10.1210/jc.2014-2700
50. Giustina A, Barkan A, Beckers A, et al.: A consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly
comorbidities: an update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020, 105:937-46. 10.1210/clinem/dgz096
51. Katznelson L, Atkinson JL, Cook DM, Ezzat SZ, Hamrahian AH, Miller KK: American Association of Clinical
Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly-
2011 update: executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2011, 17:636-46. 10.4158/ep.17.4.636
52. Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Klibanski A, et al.: A consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly
complications. Pituitary. 2013, 16:294-302. 10.1007/s11102-012-0420-x
2021 Patel et al. Cureus 13(11): e20018. DO I 10.7759/cureus.20018 9 of 9
... The increased rate of colon polyps in acromegaly has been confirmed by many studies and is widely accepted by experts [22,23]. However, reported endoscopic characteristics, such as polyp number, size, and localization, show significant alterations. ...
... Lastly, due to slower colon transit in acromegaly, insufficient colon preparation is more frequently observed in acromegaly patients compared to the general population [23]. Slow transit and longer colon length are the primary reasons why total colonoscopy is preferred over sigmoidoscopy in patients with acromegaly [19]. ...
... 23.6%] vs.26 [40.6%], p = 0.042). Similarly, multiple histopathological subtypes of colon polyps were more common in the control group than in the acromegaly group (6 [8.3%] vs. 15[23.4%], ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The existing data on colon lesions in acromegaly is notably heterogeneous. This study aimed to analyze the endoscopic and histopathological characteristics of colon polyps and other colonic lesions in acromegaly patients. Methods This case-control study included 192 acromegaly patients and 256 controls. Colon polyps were categorized based on their size and histopathological classification. Colon malignancies and other colonic lesions, such as anal fissures, hemorrhoids, and diverticulosis, were also documented. Results The prevalence of colon polyps was higher in the acromegaly group than in controls (p = 0.003), however, no differences were observed in the number, size, or histopathological subtypes of the polyps. Polyps in acromegaly patients were predominantly located in the distal colon and rectum. Multiple polyp locations and histopathological subtypes were more frequent in the control group (p = 0.042 and p = 0.018). Rates of low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and malignancy were similar between groups. Anal fissures were more common in the acromegaly group, whereas diverticulosis was less frequent (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001; respectively). Logistic regression analysis identified no significant clinical or laboratory predictors for colon polyps in acromegaly. Conclusion Patients with acromegaly exhibited a higher prevalence of colon polyps, predominantly located in the distal colon, which typically displayed a single histopathological subtype. No increased rates of colonic dysplasia, colon cancer, or other colonic lesions were observed in patients with acromegaly, except for an elevated prevalence of anal fissures.
... This activation leads to tyrosine phosphorylation within both the JAK-2 enzyme and GHR [4,5]. Consequently, the liver secretes insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), or somatomedin, which binds to its receptor on colonic epithelial cells, orchestrating heightened epithelial proliferation, reduced apoptosis, and intensified angiogenesis [6]. This relationship between extensive epithelial proliferation and a broad proliferation zone with the levels of GH and IGF-1 is evident in the colons of acromegalic patients [7]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Abdominal hypertrophy syndrome, known as steroid gut, is an uncommon condition affecting bodybuilders and athletes engaged in prolonged usage of growth hormone (GH), insulin, and other anabolic agents. The condition is more commonly known in the professional bodybuilding community as Palumboism, named after David Palumbo, an American bodybuilder. It is characterized by significant enlargement and distension of the abdomen. Precise pathophysiological mechanisms and underlying causes of Palumboism have yet to be fully understood. The primary objective of this study is to conduct a comprehensive literature review of the condition and explore the pathophysiology and possible treatment modalities. We aim to contribute to the existing knowledge of Palumboism and lay the foundation for clinical and surgical management. A literature review was conducted using PubMed and other sources. Specific keywords, such as "palumboism," "bodybuilder gut," "steroid gut," "HGH gut," "insulin gut," "bubble gut," "muscle gut," "abdominal distension," "abdominal organomegaly," "visceral adiposity," "abdominal obesity," "anabolic steroids," and "growth hormone," were employed to retrieve relevant articles. The inclusion criteria focused on studies that investigated the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of Palumboism. A total of 1,222 studies were identified through the search criteria, of which 451 were screened, 33 were assessed for eligibility, and 30 studies were included in the final review. Literature review revealed that no peer-reviewed studies dedicated to Palumboism, underscoring the insufficient research conducted in this area. The available anecdotal data suggest that the prolonged use of high-dose anabolic steroids, particularly human GH and insulin, may contribute to the development of Palumboism. Several potential mechanisms have been proposed, including visceral adiposity, organomegaly, and altered collagen synthesis. Given the dearth of available research on Palumboism, a comprehensive understanding of this condition is yet to be established. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the pathophysiology, establish diagnostic criteria, and explore treatment options for affected individuals.
... O processo diagnóstico da acromegalia envolve a avaliação clínica e bioquímica dos pacientes. A triagem inicial é frequentemente desencadeada pela presença de características fenotípicas típicas da acromegalia ou pela identificação de distúrbios associados, como apneia do sono, hipertensão, artrite debilitante, diabetes mellitus tipo 2 e síndrome do túnel do carpo (Patel et al., 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
A acromegalia é um distúrbio endócrino crônico caracterizado pelo aumento progressivo dos tecidos devido à hipersecreção do hormônio do crescimento (GH) após o fechamento das epífises ósseas, resultando em características fenotípicas distintas, como prognatismo mandibular, acromegalia das extremidades, bossa frontal proeminente, alterações na voz, entre outras manifestações. Sendo assim, é importante avaliar como os processos neuroendócrinos estão relacionados com o desenvolvimento da acromegalia, a fim de estabelecer um entendimento claro sobre como os processos de tratamento são desenvolvidos. A revisão sistemática realizada nos últimos 10 anos analisou os mecanismos neuroendócrinos no manejo da doença, com critérios de inclusão específicos e pesquisa em diversas bases de dados. Dos 31 resultados iniciais, 6 estudos foram selecionados, evidenciando a relevância dos tratamentos utilizados e suas respostas. Os achados ressaltam a necessidade de compreender as características moleculares da acromegalia para direcionar estratégias terapêuticas mais eficazes, visando a normalização dos níveis de GH e IGF-1 para controlar os sintomas e melhorar os desfechos clínicos dos pacientes afetados por esse distúrbio endócrino. Portanto, novos estudos são essenciais para elucidar melhor esses mecanismos e orientar estratégias terapêuticas mais precisas e eficazes para pacientes com acromegalia.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are rare heterogeneous tumors that arise from neuroendocrine cells throughout the body. Acromegaly, a rare and slowly progressive disorder, usually results from a growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma. Case summary: We herein describe a 38-year-old patient who was initially diagnosed with diabetes. During colonoscopy, two bulges were identified and subsequently removed through endoscopic submucosal dissection. Following the surgical intervention, the excised tissue samples were examined and confirmed to be grade 2 NET. 18F-ALF-NOTATATE positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT revealed metastases in the peri-intestinal lymph nodes, prompting laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. The patient later returned to the hospital because of hyperglycemia and was found to have facial changes, namely a larger nose, thicker lips, and mandibular prognathism. Laboratory tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggested a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma. The pituitary adenoma shrunk after treatment with octreotide and was neuroendoscopically resected via a trans-sphenoidal approach. Whole-exome sequencing analysis revealed no genetic abnormalities. The patient recovered well with no evidence of recurrence during follow-up. Conclusion: 18F-ALF-NOTATE PET/CT and MRI with pathological analysis can effectively diagnose rare cases of pituitary adenomas complicated with rectal NET.
Article
Full-text available
PurposeCurrent international guidelines recommend colonoscopy in patients with acromegaly at the time of diagnosis, even though the risk of developing colorectal neoplasm is still controversial. The main objective of this Argentine multicenter study was to analyze through screening colonoscopy the presence of advanced neoplastic lesions considered as precancerous, in patients with acromegaly compared to a control group.Methods This is a case–control retrospective study. Full length colonoscopy of 70 acromegalic patients and 128 control subjects were studied. Polyps were classified into non pre-cancerous lesions and advance neoplastic lesions which included advanced adenomas (preneoplastic) and colorectal carcinomas.ResultsThirty three out of 70 acromegalic patients and 32 out of 128 subjects controls presented polyps in the colonoscopy [47.1% vs 25%, p = 0.002, OR 2.68]. Non precancerous polyps were found in 11 (15.7%) and 23 (17.9%) (p = 0.690), while advanced neoplastic lesions were found in 22 (31.4%) and 9 (7.0%) (p = 0,0001 – OR: 6.06) patients and controls respectively. Advanced adenomas and colorectal carcinomas were found in 18 (27.3%) and 9 (7.0%) (p = 0,0006—OR: 4,57), and 4 (5.7%) and 0 (0.0%) p = 0.0063) of patients and controls respectively. The presence of insulin resistance was the only statistically significant associated factor among acromegalic patients with and without colonic polyps.Conclusions Our findings show an increased risk of preneoplastic colonic lesions and colorectal carcinoma in patients with chronic and sustained GH excess compared to a control group. This supports the recommendation to perform screening colonoscopy at diagnosis of acromegaly.
Article
Full-text available
BACKGROUND Acromegaly is a chronic disease caused by a pituitary somatotroph adenoma resulting in excess secretion of growth hormone, which leads to excess secretion of Insulin like growth factor 1 from the liver, causing abnormal soft tissue growth. There is increasing awareness that diseases affecting connective tissue are associated with an increase in functional gastrointestinal symptoms. Data was collected from patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acromegaly to evaluate the intensity, variety and impact of abdominal symptoms in comparison with a control group who were healthy participants recruited from the local fracture clinic. AIM To evaluate the frequency type and burden of abdominal symptoms in acromegaly in comparison with a control group. METHODS Medical documentation of patients with a diagnosis of acromegaly treated in one tertiary medical centre between 2010 and 2017 has been analysed. Data was collected from patients with confirmed acromegaly, using the Short Form Health Survey (SF36) and Rome IV Diagnostic questionnaire for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Adults (R4DQ) and compared to a sex- and age-matched control group, to assess the burden of abdominal symptoms. Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS v 25 were used for data analysis. RESULTS Fifty patients with acromegaly (24 male and 26 females; age range 23-64 years, mean 43) and 200 controls (96 male and 104 females; age range 18-84, mean 42.4) were recruited. 92% (46 out of 50) of patients with acromegaly reported abdominal symptoms and 78% (39 out of 50) had at least one functional gastrointestinal disorder according to the Rome IV diagnostic criteria, compared to 16% of controls (OR > 1, P < 0.0001). The most commonly reported symptom was constipation (69% acromegaly vs 21% of controls OR > 1, P < 0.0001, 95%CI: 4.4–15.8). 34 out of 50 (68%) respondents met the criteria for functional constipation according to Rome IV. Upper gastrointestinal disorders were also more prevalent in the acromegaly group. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of biliary and anorectal symptoms between the two groups. Patients in acromegaly group scored lower on the mean scores of the eight parameters of SF36 Quality of Life questionnaire (mean scores 60.04 vs 71.23, 95%CI: -13.6829 to -8.6971, OR > 1, P < 0.001) as compared to the control group. CONCLUSION Upper and lower functional gastrointestinal tract disorders (defined by Rome IV diagnostic criteria) are significantly more prevalent in patients with acromegaly compared with healthy age and sex matched controls in our study. Functional constipation is the most commonly reported problem. Poorer quality of life may in part be attributable to the increased prevalence of abdominal symptoms. Key Words: Functional gastrointestinal disorders, Acromegaly, Constipation, Irritable bowel syndrome, Somatostatin, Pituitary Core tip: Irritable bowel syndrome is the commonest cause of gastrointestinal symptoms. The aetiology is thought to be multi-factorial but remains incompletely understood. Our group has previously identified that patients with connective tissue disorders have an increased incidence of functional gastrointestinal symptoms. Investigating for these symptoms in patients with acromegaly may give further insight into the pathogenesis of functional disorders and irritable bowel syndrome.
Article
Full-text available
Acromegaly is a systemic disease associated with increased morbidity, presenting cardiovascular, metabolic, respiratory, neoplastic, endocrine, articular and bone complications. Most of these comorbidities can be prevented or delayed with adequate disease treatment and, more recent studies with the use of modern treatments of acromegaly, have shown a change in the severity and prevalence of these complications. In addition, acromegaly is associated with increased mortality, but recent studies (especially those published in the last decade) have shown a different scenario than older studies, with mortality no longer being increased in adequately controlled patients and a change in the main cause of death from cardiovascular disease to malignancy. In this review, we discuss this changing face of acromegaly summarizing current knowledge and evidence on morbimortality of the disease. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(6):630-7
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The burden of chronic daily subcutaneous administration of pegvisomant on adherence has not been previously studied. This study was aimed to determine the adherence to pegvisomant treatment in acromegaly patients in the real-world clinical practice setting in Spain. Methods Multicenter, observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study in patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant for at least 12 months. Patient adherence was indirectly determined by Batalla and Haynes-Sackett questionnaires and directly by prescription record review. Additionally, treatment satisfaction was assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) and treatment convenience by an ad-hoc Pegvisomant questionnaire. Errors in reconstitution and administration process were determined by direct observation. Results 108 patients were included in the analysis. Rates of adherence varied from 60.7 to 92.1% and did not correlate with disease control. Older patient age and alternative schedules other than daily pegvisomant dosing were associated with lower adherence. Treatment satisfaction and convenience was high, with a mean (SD) total SATMED-Q score of 74.6 ± 15.4 over 100 and a total ad-hoc Pegvisomant questionnaire score of 71.2 ± 15.2 over 100. 34.3% of patients made mistakes during the reconstitution /administration process. Conclusions Patient adherence to pegvisomant was high (60.7–92.1%), but more than a third of the patients in the study made mistakes during the administration process, with a potential impact on disease control. Besides dosing compliance, correct administration of medication should be carefully assessed in these patients.
Article
Introduction: Acromegaly is a disease characterized by elevated growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels. Surgery is the only curative treatment, while medical therapies are administered lifelong. To date, almost 30% of patients treated with the currently available medical therapies do not achieve biochemical control. Areas covered: This review focuses on new drugs in development for acromegaly. In detail, we provide an overview of the new molecules designed to improve disease control rate (such as novel somotostatin receptor ligands and antisense oligonucleotides), as well as the new formulations of existing medications aiming to improve patients' compliance (e.g. oral or long-acting subcutaneous octreotide). Expert opinion: The constant progresses in the medical treatment of acromegaly could lead to an individualized therapy based on tumor, as well as patient's characteristics. Besides disease control, patient's need represents a major target of medical treatment in chronic diseases such as acromegaly, in order to improve compliance to therapy and patients' quality of life.
Article
The literature on an association between acromegaly and cancer is particularly abundant on either colorectal cancer or thyroid cancer, and an endless debate is ongoing whether patients with acromegaly should be submitted to specific oncology screening and surveillance protocols. The aim of the present work is to review the more most recent data on the risk of either colorectal cancer or thyroid cancer in acromegaly and discuss the opportunity for specific screening in relation to the accepted procedures in the general population.
Article
Objective: Patients with acromegaly are at increased risk of colorectal polyps. However, their risk of colorectal cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the histopathological features of colorectal polyps in patients with acromegaly and compare their risk of colorectal cancer with that in healthy controls. Methods: The study participants were 178 patients who underwent Hardy's operation and perioperative colonoscopy at our hospital between April 2008 and September 2016. For the control group, we randomly selected 356 age- and sex-matched patients who underwent colonoscopy at our hospital during the same period. The incidence, size, location, and histology of the colorectal polyps detected were compared between the groups. Results: Colorectal polyps were detected in 66.8% of the acromegaly group and 24.2% of the control group (p<0.001). The average number and size of the polyps were 2.44 and 4.74 mm, respectively, in the acromegaly group and 1.77 and 3.89 mm in the control group (p=0.001). Polyps in the acromegaly group were more likely to be in the rectosigmoid region (p=0.006). In the acromegaly group, the frequency of polyps ≥5 mm was 34.3% and that for polyps ≥10 mm was 15.2%; the respective values were 7.6% and 2.2% in the control group (p<0.001). We found no evidence of between-group histopathological differences in the polyp specimens resected by endoscopy. Conclusions: Patients with acromegaly are at increased risk of colorectal polyps, especially in the rectosigmoid region. However, there is no pathological evidence that they are at greater risk of colorectal cancer than the general population.
Article
Objective The aim of the Acromegaly Consensus Group was to revise and update the consensus on diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly comorbidities last published in 2013. Participants The Consensus Group, convened by 11 Steering Committee members, consisted of 45 experts in the medical and surgical management of acromegaly. The authors received no corporate funding or remuneration. Evidence This evidence-based Consensus was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to describe both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence following critical discussion of the current literature on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly comorbidities. Consensus Process Acromegaly Consensus Group participants conducted comprehensive literature searches for English-language papers on selected topics, reviewed brief presentations on each topic, and discussed current practice and recommendations in breakout groups. Consensus recommendations were developed based on all presentations and discussions. Members of the Scientific Committee graded the quality of the supporting evidence and the consensus recommendations using the GRADE system. Conclusions Evidence-based approach consensus recommendations address important clinical issues regarding multidisciplinary management of acromegaly-related cardiovascular, endocrine, metabolic, and oncologic comorbidities, sleep apnea, and bone and joint disorders and their sequelae, as well as their effects on quality of life and mortality.
Article
Acromegaly is characterized by increased release of growth hormone and, consequently, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF1), most often by a pituitary adenoma. Prolonged exposure to excess hormone leads to progressive somatic disfigurement and a wide range of systemic manifestations that are associated with increased mortality. Although considered a rare disease, recent studies have reported an increased incidence of acromegaly owing to better disease awareness, improved diagnostic tools and perhaps a real increase in prevalence. Acromegaly treatment approaches, which include surgery, radiotherapy and medical therapy, have changed considerably over time owing to improved surgical procedures, development of new radiotherapy techniques and availability of new medical therapies. The optimal use of these treatments will reduce mortality in patients with acromegaly to levels in the general population. Medical therapy is currently an important treatment option and can even be the first-line treatment in patients with acromegaly who will not benefit from or are not suitable for first-line neurosurgical treatment. Pharmacological treatments include somatostatin receptor ligands (such as octreotide, lanreotide and pasireotide), dopamine agonists and the growth hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant. In this Primer, we review the main aspects of acromegaly, including scientific advances that underlie expanding knowledge of disease pathogenesis, improvements in disease management and new medical therapies that are available and in development to improve disease control.
Article
Background Regarding the incidence of colorectal malignancy and polyps in patients with acromegaly, studies reported different results in different populations. For this reason, the aim of this study was to determine the frequency of possible colonic pathologies, such as diverticula, polyps, and malignancies in Turkish patients with active acromegaly and factors affecting them. MethodsA total of 134 patients with acromegaly and 134 patients with irritable bowel syndrome/dyspeptic symptoms as a control group were included in the study. None of these patients had a previous or family history of colonic neoplasms. Colonoscopies of patients with acromegaly were performed before definitive surgery in a single center by experienced endoscopists. ResultsThe acromegaly and control groups were similar in terms of age and sex. The incidence of all colonic polyps was significantly higher in the acromegaly group (p = 0.012). The frequency of hyperplastic polyps was also increased in the acromegaly group (p = 0.004); however, the frequencies of adenomatous polyps and colonic diverticula were similar in both groups. In the comparison of patients with acromegaly for the presence of polyps, those with polyps were older, had higher levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), were of male sex, and skin tags were more common (p = 0.016, p = 0.034, p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively). There were no colorectal malignancies in the patients with active acromegaly. Conclusion The frequency of hyperplastic polyps was increased, whereas colonic malignancy was not observed in Turkish patients with active acromegaly.