Conference PaperPDF Available

Riverine Microplastic Pollution in ASEAN Countries - Current State of Knowledge

Authors:

Abstract

Link: https://www.iges.or.jp/en/pub/riverine-microplastic-asean/en Abstract: Water pollution caused by microplastics generated from land-based sources (e.g. as tire-wear particles, broken road markings, synthetic textile microfiber from washing, microbeads from personal care products, and discharged domestic wastewater from households) is attracting attention in many countries and regions around the world as an emerging environmental problem, not only at national, regional, but also global level. Microplastics released from these sources often flow directly or indirectly into surrounding aquatic environments i.e., rivers, and eventually enter the ocean. Adverse impacts of microplastics on ecosystems and aquaculture organisms have been well-reported, which gradually may cause potential adverse effects on human health. Unfortunately, in most ASEAN countries, basic knowledge about the occurrence, ingestion, and impacts of riverine microplastics pollution on the ecosystem and human health is very limited. As a result, appropriate and effective countermeasures to control the emission of microplastics have not yet been established. This Discussion Paper presents a concise and insightful review of the current state of knowledge on the occurrence, ingestion, and impacts of MPs on ecosystems and human health. Moreover, due to the transboundary nature of the plastic litter issues, thus any single country solution will not be sufficient to address these regional and transboundary issues. The paper calls for a collective effort from all the ASEAN Member States to address the issues along the plastic value chain through the circular economy approach, from raw material extraction, design, production, distribution, responsible plastic consumption (especially single-use plastic products), collection/reuse/repair, to the recycling stage and final disposal.
ISAP
2021
International Forum for Sustainable Asia and the Pacific
ISAP2021
DISCUSSION PAPER
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION
IN ASEAN COUNTRIES
- CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
Pham Ngoc Bao1, Yukako Inamura1, Amila Abeynayaka2
Pankaj Kumar1, Bijon Kumar Mitra1,3
1: Adaptation and Water Area, IGES
2: IGES Centre Collaborating with UNEP on Environmental Technology (CCET), IGES
3: Integrated Sustainability Center, IGES
ISAP
Executive Summary
Water pollution caused by microplastics generated from land-based sources (e.g. as tire-wear particles, broken road
markings, synthetic textile microfibre from washing, microbeads from personal care products, discharged domestic
wastewater from households, and others) is attracting attention in many countries and regions around the world as
an emerging environmental problem, not only at national and regional level, but also worldwide. Microplastics
released from these sources often flow directly or indirectly into surrounding aquatic environments such as rivers and
lakes, and eventually enter the ocean. The adverse impacts of microplastics on ecosystems and aquaculture
organisms have been well-reported, and they may gradually cause potential adverse effects on human health as well.
Unfortunately, in most member states in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), basic knowledge about
the occurrence, ingestion and impacts of riverine microplastics pollution on ecosystem and human health is
very limited. As a result, appropriate and effective countermeasures to control the emission of microplastics have
not yet been established. This Discussion Paper presents a concise and insightful review of the current state of
knowledge on the occurrence, ingestion and impacts of microplastics on ecosystems and human health.
Moreover, due to the transboundary nature of plastic litter issues, any solutions implemented in single country
will not be sufficient to address these regional and transboundary issues. The paper calls for collective efforts
from all the ASEAN Member States to address issues along the plastic value chain through the circular economy
approach, from raw material extraction, design, production, distribution, responsible plastic consumption
(especially single use plastic products), collection/reuse/repair, to the recycling stage and final disposal.
- 1 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
Plastics in a river
1. Introduction
Human society has been sustained by consuming
resources, and plastic has become one of the materials
we use to maintain a convenient and comfortable
lifestyle. Plastic was invented in the early 1800s as a
substance for tooth filling and as a reinforcing material
(British Plastic Federation, 2021). Since the first
appearance of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) in the early
1900s, plastic has been used in many products, and its
low cost, convenience and durability created strong
demand from the manufacturing and packaging
industries (Ryan, 2015). Because of this huge demand,
the annual global production of plastic has seen a
massive increase from 2 million tonnes per year in
1950 to 381 million tonnes per year in 2015. More than
70% of the total amount of plastic was produced after
1990 (Geyer et al., 2017). It has been reported that the
ASEAN region, comprised of member states of the
Association of Southeast Asian Nations, accounts for
about 20% of global plastic production (Borongan et
al., 2018). The ASEAN countries with the largest growth
in plastic production and consumption are Indonesia,
Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Viet
Nam. Four ASEAN countries (Indonesia, the Philippines,
Thailand and Viet Nam) and China are estimated to
contribute to about half of the world’ s marine plastic
litter generation (Geyer et al., 2017).
In addition, the ’takeaway food culture’, ‘e-commerce
activities’ and ‘sachet economy’ are growing in the
region, leading to an increased use of plastics.
Consumer preferences are also shifting from traditional
fresh foods to packaged foods, while at the same time,
shopping on digital platforms is on the rise (The World
Bank, 2021). Consequently, this convenience and
versatility has resulted in an increase in plastic waste,
with mismanaged plastic waste emerging as an
environmental problem. The scientific community has
made great efforts to spread awareness about the
environmental consequences from this plastic pollution,
but in absence of any strict regulations, irrational
consumption and littering has continued, resulting in
severe damage to global aquatic ecosystems (Alegado
et al., 2021; Bean, 1987).
Microplastics (MPs) are currently a great concern as
they exist in water, sediments, fauna and even flora
(Kalčíková, 2020). However, there is no all-inclusive
definition which accurately encompasses the criteria
that could potentially describe microplastics. These
small-size plastic pieces, with a size less than 5mm, are
produced as synthetic raw materials or generated as a
result of the breakdown and fragmentation of larger
pieces of plastic. MPs are divided into two categories,
primary and secondary, based on their origin. Primary
MPs enter the environment directly. Secondary MPs
derive from the breakdown of larger plastic pieces in
the environment. This environmental degradation of
plastic is governed by the synergic effects of photo-
and thermo-oxidative degradation, abrasion and
biological activities (Amila Abeynayaka et al., 2020;
Barnes et al., 2009). Figure 1 shows the categorisation
of plastic debris. Primary MPs are comprised of
tire-wear particles, broken road markings, synthetic
textile microfibres from washing, microbeads from
personal care products and land-based accidental
pellet releases. Secondary MPs are made up of
decomposed macroplastic debris originating from
roads, domestic wastewater systems and municipal
waste dumps. These MPs originate from various
environmental sources through multiple pathways:
road runoff, wastewater systems, wind movement, and
marine activities. (Boucher & Friot, 2017).
MPs released from these sources often flow directly or
indirectly into surrounding aquatic environments such
as rivers, and eventually enter the ocean. However,
there is still not much scientific evidence on the
potential negative impacts of MPs on ecosystems and
aquaculture organisms, or on the implications of
microplastics toxicity on human health, and as such,
the issue is not well-understood in most ASEAN
countries. In addition, basic knowledge is quite limited
about the occurrence and status of MP pollution,
particularly riverine MP pollution, and the impact on
ecosystems and human health. As a result, appropriate
and effective countermeasures to control the emission
of MPs have not yet been established.
- 2 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
Human society has been sustained by consuming
resources, and plastic has become one of the materials
we use to maintain a convenient and comfortable
lifestyle. Plastic was invented in the early 1800s as a
substance for tooth filling and as a reinforcing material
(British Plastic Federation, 2021). Since the first
appearance of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) in the early
1900s, plastic has been used in many products, and its
low cost, convenience and durability created strong
demand from the manufacturing and packaging
industries (Ryan, 2015). Because of this huge demand,
the annual global production of plastic has seen a
massive increase from 2 million tonnes per year in
1950 to 381 million tonnes per year in 2015. More than
70% of the total amount of plastic was produced after
1990 (Geyer et al., 2017). It has been reported that the
ASEAN region, comprised of member states of the
Association of Southeast Asian Nations, accounts for
about 20% of global plastic production (Borongan et
al., 2018). The ASEAN countries with the largest growth
in plastic production and consumption are Indonesia,
Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Viet
Nam. Four ASEAN countries (Indonesia, the Philippines,
Thailand and Viet Nam) and China are estimated to
contribute to about half of the world’ s marine plastic
litter generation (Geyer et al., 2017).
In addition, the ’takeaway food culture’, ‘e-commerce
activities’ and ‘sachet economy’ are growing in the
region, leading to an increased use of plastics.
Consumer preferences are also shifting from traditional
fresh foods to packaged foods, while at the same time,
shopping on digital platforms is on the rise (The World
Bank, 2021). Consequently, this convenience and
versatility has resulted in an increase in plastic waste,
with mismanaged plastic waste emerging as an
environmental problem. The scientific community has
made great efforts to spread awareness about the
environmental consequences from this plastic pollution,
but in absence of any strict regulations, irrational
consumption and littering has continued, resulting in
severe damage to global aquatic ecosystems (Alegado
et al., 2021; Bean, 1987).
Microplastics (MPs) are currently a great concern as
they exist in water, sediments, fauna and even flora
(Kalčíková, 2020). However, there is no all-inclusive
definition which accurately encompasses the criteria
that could potentially describe microplastics. These
small-size plastic pieces, with a size less than 5mm, are
produced as synthetic raw materials or generated as a
result of the breakdown and fragmentation of larger
pieces of plastic. MPs are divided into two categories,
primary and secondary, based on their origin. Primary
MPs enter the environment directly. Secondary MPs
derive from the breakdown of larger plastic pieces in
the environment. This environmental degradation of
plastic is governed by the synergic effects of photo-
and thermo-oxidative degradation, abrasion and
biological activities (Amila Abeynayaka et al., 2020;
Barnes et al., 2009). Figure 1 shows the categorisation
of plastic debris. Primary MPs are comprised of
tire-wear particles, broken road markings, synthetic
textile microfibres from washing, microbeads from
personal care products and land-based accidental
pellet releases. Secondary MPs are made up of
decomposed macroplastic debris originating from
roads, domestic wastewater systems and municipal
waste dumps. These MPs originate from various
environmental sources through multiple pathways:
road runoff, wastewater systems, wind movement, and
marine activities. (Boucher & Friot, 2017).
This discussion paper aims to provide a concise review
of the current state of knowledge on the occurrence,
ingestion and impacts of MPs on ecosystems and
human health. It also initiates discussion and dialogues
on how to minimise the discharge of MPs into aquatic
environments, particularly into rivers, either through
effective end-of-pipe wastewater treatment
technologies, or changing lifestyles and consumption
habits for products/materials containing MPs.
MPs released from these sources often flow directly or
indirectly into surrounding aquatic environments such
as rivers, and eventually enter the ocean. However,
there is still not much scientific evidence on the
potential negative impacts of MPs on ecosystems and
aquaculture organisms, or on the implications of
microplastics toxicity on human health, and as such,
the issue is not well-understood in most ASEAN
countries. In addition, basic knowledge is quite limited
about the occurrence and status of MP pollution,
particularly riverine MP pollution, and the impact on
ecosystems and human health. As a result, appropriate
and effective countermeasures to control the emission
of MPs have not yet been established.
Figure 1. Characteristics for categorising plastic debris. a) Size-based classification (modified from Abeynayaka et
al 2021) and b) Morphology-based classification (Source: Abeynayaka et al., 2021; Lusher et al., 2017; Pirika, 2021)
- 3 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
Figure 2 shows the pathways taken by MPs as they
enter freshwater and marine environments from
land-based sources such as direct littering, wastewater
treatment plants (WWTPs) and households (HHs).
While scholars have revealed evidence of MP pollution
in water, particularly in oceans, national governments
also began to address the issue by implementing
various measures. For example, Belgium, Canada,
France, Italy, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Sweden,
Taiwan, the United Kingdom and the United States
have all imposed bans on adding MPs to personal care
products (PCPs) prior to 2017. Moreover, regional
economic and political unions such as the European
Union (EU) and ASEAN also initiated different actions
for managing MPs (Kadarudin et al., 2020; Kentin &
Kaarto, 2018).
Several empirical studies show the occurrence of MPs
in water bodies including the Arctic and the Antarctic
Oceans, rivers and lakes around the world (Constant et
al., 2020; A. L. Lusher et al., 2015; Phuong et al., 2021;
Sarijan et al., 2021; Waller et al., 2017; Zeri et al., 2021).
A significant amount of plastic has been produced and
disposed of in Asia. It has been reported that 15% of
the total solid waste by mass was plastic waste in Asia,
and half of this amount reach the ocean from
land-based sources, contributing to global MPs issues
(Alegado et al., 2021). Indeed, studies conducted in
ASEAN countries found large amounts of MPs in rivers
(Lahens et al., 2018; Sarijan et al., 2021). Studies found
that synthetic materials have become the dominant
clothing material in recent times, and during the
COVID-19 pandemic, single-use plastics have become
preferred items, implying that, without action, MP
pollution is not likely to be mitigated anytime soon
(Arkin et al., 2019).
2. Occurrences, pathways and impacts of
microplastics on ecosystems and human health
2.1. Occurrence of microplastics in aquatic environments,
particularly rivers
Figure 2. Pathways for microplastics to enter riverine systems and reach oceans
- 4 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
(Source: UNEP, 2021)
Primary MPs are produced as small synthetic raw
materials for abrasive components in PCPs including
cosmetics and toothpaste as well as industrial raw
materials. Microfibers are particles from synthetic
textiles such as polyester, acrylic and nylon, which are
shed when clothes are washed, and enter freshwater
systems. Secondary MPs are generated due to the
fragmentation of larger plastic pieces that are used for
activities such as food packaging, beverage bottles,
industrial materials, household goods, synthetic fibres,
and many others (Hann et al., 2018; Lim, 2021; Sundt et
al., 2014). These MPs are thought to reach the ocean
by falling from the air (atmospheric fall-out), being
swept away by rain (run-off), or draining into ditches
and rivers (Dris et al., 2016). Septic tank systems and
WWTPs are also found to be major sources of MPs
(Leslie et al., 2017; Miller et al., 2017).
Once plastics enter the environment, they move within
a compartment or move between compartments by
various means (Figure 3 illustrates the major
compartments and exposure pathways of MPs).
Simultaneously degradation causes plastic to break
into smaller components. Due to its longer half-life, the
longevity of plastic is estimated to be hundreds to
thousands of years. Hence, complete breakdown and
removal from systems takes hundreds of years (Barnes
et al., 2009). Human exposure pathways are mostly
associated with inhalation, ingestion through drinking
water, food web-associated ingestion, and dermal
intake, and MPs will eventually reach the intestines
(Prata et al., 2020). Thus, the absorption of harmful
substances is a great concern (Ahechti et al., 2020; Fu
et al., 2021).
2.2. Major sources, fate and human exposure pathways of MPs
Figure 3. Fate of plastics and human exposure pathways (modified from Abeynayaka & Itsubo, 2019; Abeynayaka, 2021)
- 5 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
Currently, studies on MPs mainly investigate the
occurrence, distribution and ingestion by biota, as well
as analysis of physical morphologies in the aquatic
ecosystems. The adverse effects of plastic litter in
ecosystems have been widely discussed in existing
literature (Bellasi et al., 2020; Horton et al., 2018).
Plastic contaminants in freshwater are a threat to
ecosystems as well as a potential health hazard to
humans (Jemec et al., 2016; Redondo-Hasselerharm et
al., 2018; Su et al., 2018).
Microplastics can be ingested by plankton at the
bottom of the aquatic food chain allowing plastics to
move to the next level of the chain, eventually affecting
humans. Transparent microplastics along the Surabaya
River in Indonesia, for instance, make it more
susceptible to ingestion by aquatic biota as it is similar
in colour to original prey (Lestari, et.al., 2020). The
presence of anthropogenic plastic debris in fish and
shellfish was found in grocery markets in Indonesia,
indicating that plastics have already infiltrated marine
food webs via sea products (Rochman et al., 2015).
A study on potential microplastics in fish from the
Surabaya River showed that microplastics were found
in 72% of fish samples (103 Surabaya fish samples from
9 species of fish) (Kristanto, 2018). In addition, the
herbivorous and polyphagous fish groups had the
highest incidence of microplastics, occurring in 67%
-100% of the studied fish.
In another study carried out by the University of
California, Davis, and Hasanuddin University in
Indonesia, 76 fish samples across 11 different species
were collected from markets in Makassar, Indonesia.
The study revealed that anthropogenic debris (plastic
or fibrous material) was found in 28% of individual fish
(in their guts) and in 55% of all species (Rochman et al.,
2015). In another study conducted in Japan,
microplastics were detected in the digestive tracts of
49 out of 64 Japanese anchovies (Engraulis Japonicus),
77% of sampled fishes in Tokyo Bay (Tanaka & Takada,
2016). Among detected microplastics, polyethylene
(PE) and polypropylene (PP) account for 52.0% and
43.3%, respectively. The results from this study also
indicated that most of the detected plastics were
fragments (86.0%), and 7.3% were beads or
microbeads, similar to those found in facial cleansers.
Although the effects of microplastic ingestion on
human health are not fully understood, microplastics
are known to travel through the human digestive tract
and into human organs. In addition, microplastics can
contain toxic contaminants (e.g. bisphenol A, phthalate
plasticizers, carcinogens, polybrominated flame
retardants and heavy metals), which are either derived
from the plastic itself or absorbed from the
surrounding environment. The exposure may cause
cancer, neurological and immune system damage, as
well as having other effects, if the particles themselves
are toxic or if they absorb toxic substances (Arkin et al.,
2019; Smith et al., 2018). Table 1 summarises the
potential human health effects of MPs and associated
chemicals.
A recent study reported that the presence of MPs in
human placentas may lead to adverse pregnancy
outcomes including preeclampsia and fetal growth
restriction (Ragusa et al., 2021). This study observed
the presence of microplastic fragments ranging from 5
to 10 μm in size, with spheric or irregular shape in
placentas (5 in the fetal side, 4 in the maternal side and
3 in the chorioamniotic membranes), which are
possibly used for manmade coatings, paints, adhesives,
plasters, finger paints, polymers and cosmetics and
personal care products (ibid.).
2.3. Ecosystem and human health risks
- 6 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
Table 1. Potential human health effects due to exposure to plastic-associated chemicals.
(Source: Nikiema et al., 2020)
It has been reported that between 1.15 and 2.41
million tonnes of plastic debris are being discharged
from rivers into the oceans every year around the
world, with 86% of this debris emanating from Asian
rivers (Lebreton et al., 2017). Rapid economic growth,
changes in urban lifestyles and consumption patterns,
high ratio of poorly managed plastic waste (about 70%
in Asia, based on 2010 data, according to Jambeck et
al. (2015)), and frequent heavy rainfalls in the region
are considered to be major reasons behind high plastic
pollution in oceans, generating from Asia. It has been
reported that the top 20 rivers polluted with plastic
debris were mostly located in Asia (with seven rivers
located in ASEAN countries), accounting for more than
two-thirds (67%) of the global annual plastic input
(Lebreton et al., 2017). Rivers are considered to be one
of the major pathways for land-based plastic waste,
mainly coming from single-use plastic items. The waste
reaches the world’ s oceans (Schmidt et al., 2017), and
it is further broken down into microplastics after 20 to
hundreds of years, causing a threat to biodiversity
(Barra & Leonard, 2018; Sarkar et al., 2021). Figure 4
shows examples of the time it takes for some typical
single-use plastic items to decompose. In light of the
this, it is important to further investigate the fate and
flow mechanisms of MPs in the riverine system to
design a robust management system.
3. Status of riverine microplastic pollution in ASEAN
countries
3.1. Why do we need to focus on riverine microplastics?
- 7 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
Brain/Nervous system
Potential human health impacts
Neuro-developmental disorders (Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
Autism, Neurobehavioral, IQ, Cognition
Metabolic diseases Type 2 diabetes, childhood obesity; increased waist circumference; serum lipid
levels, e.g. total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol
Pregnancy outcomes -
offspring
Affected organs
(or potential health issues)
Gestational length; birth weight; delayed pubertal timing; genital structure
(ano-genital distance); and pubertal onset
Reproductive system
Polycystic ovarian syndrome, Endometriosis, Male sub-fertility, Reduced sperm
quality, Delayed time to pregnancy, Abnormal PAP smears, Pregnancy-induced
hypertension, and/or pre-eclampsia
Thyroid Hormonal (Thyroid disease, Thyroid cancer)
Respiratory system Asthma
Heart Cardiovascular disease
Antibody responses Decreased antibody response to vaccines
The management of plastic waste on land is of utmost
importance; however, MPs, particularly secondary MPs,
are found in the effluent from WWTPs (Liu et al., 2020;
Zeri et al., 2021). The literature suggeted that advanced
wastewater treatment technologies, which include
tertiary treatment processes (e.g. membrane bioreactor
(MBR), sand filtration, etc.) could remove most MPs
with removal efficiency of between 89.17 % and 97.15
%. Moreover, MPs removed at WWTPs were white
colour microfibres, 0.1 – 0.5 mm in size (Xu et al., 2019).
These MPs were rayon, polyethylene terephthalate
(PET), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE),
polystyrene (PS) and PE-PP from laundry and industry,
and were mainly found in samples of influent and
sludge at WWTP, but also found in the effluent (Lee &
Kim, 2018).
MPs have also been found in raw and treated water at
two water treatment plants in Indonesia, with a
concentration of 26.8-35 and 8.5-12.3 particles/L,
respectively. The MPs were made up of 93-95% fibre in
the raw water, and 84-100% fibre in the treated water.
The MPs dominant size in the raw and treated water
was 351-1,000 μm, with percentages of 45-50% and
36-69%, respectively. The dominant polymer types of
MPs in the raw water were PE, PP, and LDPE. The water
treatment plants I and II had a total MP removal
efficiency of 54% and 76%, respectively
(Radityaningrum et al., 2021).
3.2. Detection of microplastics in river water, raw and treated
water/wastewater samples
It is reported that there were between 15 and 51 rillion
microplastic particles floating in surface waters around
the world in 2015 (Lim, 2021). Since these particles
travel between the sea and land, people may be
ingesting plastic from everywhere (ibid.). Reports on
ASEAN countries have shown that the Ciwalangke,
Surabaya and Citarum Rivers in Indonesia, the Chao
Phraya River in Thailand, and the Cherating River in
Malaysia are hotspots for MP pollution (R. Kumar et al.,
2021). Besides these major rivers, MPs were also
detected in canals and tributaries in Viet Nam (Lahens
et al., 2018). In the Philippines, the abundance of MPs
in five major river mouths namely the Cañas,
Meycauayan, Parañaque, Pasig, and Tullahan rivers
draining into Manila Bay varied from 1,580–57,665
particles/m3 in surface waters and 514–1, 357
particles/kg in dry sediments (Osorio et al., 2021).
Plastic fragments are the most dominant form across
all samples taken from these rivers. This may be
attributed to indiscriminate waste dumping and
mismanaged plastic waste as evidenced by the amount
of macroplastics observed during sampling. Plastic film
was also significantly abundant in all samples especially
in the Cañas and Pasig Rivers as the mouths of these
two rivers were surrounded by large residential
settlements, where direct littering and rampant
garbage dumping were observed. Most film was
detected as low-density polyethylene (LDPE) (ibid.).
Despite the significant addition by ASEAN countries to
plastic pollution in the oceans, there are still not many
detailed studies about status quo of MPs in different
riverine systems (Alegado et al., 2021). Furthermore,
most of the existing studies investigated occurrence,
distribution and morphologies, whereas it is the exact
fate of MPs from source to ocean that needs further
investigation.
Figure 4. Time required for decomposing single-use plastic items (Source: Rhodes, 2018; Stanes & Gibson, 2017; WWF, 2021)
- 8 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
3.3. Technologies for the removal of MPs at wastewater treatment
plants
Due to their low density and small particle size,
microplastics are easily discharged into the wastewater
drainage systems. Therefore, municipal wastewater
treatment plants (WWTPs) have been shown to be the
main recipients of MPs before they are discharged into
natural water environments (Ngo et al., 2019).
Consequently, it is important to develop appropriate
wastewater treatment technologies to reduce MP
leakages from WWTPs to nearby aquatic environments.
Although the literature indicates that advanced WWTPs
could efficiently remove MPs, it is a fact that WWTPs in
operations are not necessarily advanced. Moreover, not
many households in the ASEAN region are connected
to centralised sewage treatment plants, indicating the
possibility of more MPs leaking from human activities
directly to freshwater and marine environments.
Neither centralised and decentralised wastewater
treatment systems are specifically designed to remove
MPs, but they do remove other organic and inorganic
pollutants. Therefore, it is vital to take this fact into
account in the design and installation of new or
modified wastewater treatment technologies in the
near future. In the case of centralised WWT systems,
Figure 5 shows how efficiently microplastics can be
removed from various treatment processes, if the
wastewater treatment facility is operated properly
(Nikiema et al., 2020). These results provide a rough
understanding of the removal efficiency of
microplastics by different treatment processes and may
serve as a basis for developing new or appropriate
technologies to remove MPs from effluent at WWTPs.
The literature investigating MP removal from
decentralised wastewater treatment systems is limited.
Decentralised WWTPs are the major method for water
treatement in the ASEAN region, so it is essential to
study MP removal in decentralised systems in order to
to reduce MPs in the riverine system.
The management of plastic waste on land is of utmost
importance; however, MPs, particularly secondary MPs,
are found in the effluent from WWTPs (Liu et al., 2020;
Zeri et al., 2021). The literature suggeted that advanced
wastewater treatment technologies, which include
tertiary treatment processes (e.g. membrane bioreactor
(MBR), sand filtration, etc.) could remove most MPs
with removal efficiency of between 89.17 % and 97.15
%. Moreover, MPs removed at WWTPs were white
colour microfibres, 0.1 – 0.5 mm in size (Xu et al., 2019).
These MPs were rayon, polyethylene terephthalate
(PET), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE),
polystyrene (PS) and PE-PP from laundry and industry,
and were mainly found in samples of influent and
sludge at WWTP, but also found in the effluent (Lee &
Kim, 2018).
MPs have also been found in raw and treated water at
two water treatment plants in Indonesia, with a
concentration of 26.8-35 and 8.5-12.3 particles/L,
respectively. The MPs were made up of 93-95% fibre in
the raw water, and 84-100% fibre in the treated water.
The MPs dominant size in the raw and treated water
was 351-1,000 μm, with percentages of 45-50% and
36-69%, respectively. The dominant polymer types of
MPs in the raw water were PE, PP, and LDPE. The water
treatment plants I and II had a total MP removal
efficiency of 54% and 76%, respectively
(Radityaningrum et al., 2021).
It is reported that there were between 15 and 51 rillion
microplastic particles floating in surface waters around
the world in 2015 (Lim, 2021). Since these particles
travel between the sea and land, people may be
ingesting plastic from everywhere (ibid.). Reports on
ASEAN countries have shown that the Ciwalangke,
Surabaya and Citarum Rivers in Indonesia, the Chao
Phraya River in Thailand, and the Cherating River in
Malaysia are hotspots for MP pollution (R. Kumar et al.,
2021). Besides these major rivers, MPs were also
detected in canals and tributaries in Viet Nam (Lahens
et al., 2018). In the Philippines, the abundance of MPs
in five major river mouths namely the Cañas,
Meycauayan, Parañaque, Pasig, and Tullahan rivers
draining into Manila Bay varied from 1,580–57,665
particles/m3 in surface waters and 514–1, 357
particles/kg in dry sediments (Osorio et al., 2021).
Plastic fragments are the most dominant form across
all samples taken from these rivers. This may be
attributed to indiscriminate waste dumping and
mismanaged plastic waste as evidenced by the amount
of macroplastics observed during sampling. Plastic film
was also significantly abundant in all samples especially
in the Cañas and Pasig Rivers as the mouths of these
two rivers were surrounded by large residential
settlements, where direct littering and rampant
garbage dumping were observed. Most film was
detected as low-density polyethylene (LDPE) (ibid.).
Despite the significant addition by ASEAN countries to
plastic pollution in the oceans, there are still not many
detailed studies about status quo of MPs in different
riverine systems (Alegado et al., 2021). Furthermore,
most of the existing studies investigated occurrence,
distribution and morphologies, whereas it is the exact
fate of MPs from source to ocean that needs further
investigation.
- 9 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
October 2018, the Government of Malaysia released its
Roadmap to Eliminate Single-use Plastics 2018 - 2030,
announcing a policy to eliminate plastic straws and
plastic bags by 2030. In Thailand, the Government
announced a Roadmap on Plastic Waste Management
2018-2030, with the aim of reducing and halting the use
of plastic and replacing it with environmentally-friendly
materials. Accordingly, three plastic products, including
plastic cap seals for water bottles, oxo-degradable
plastics and plastic microbeads, would be banned in
Thailand. The use of four other types of plastic,
including plastic bags less than 36 microns in thickness,
styrofoam food boxes, plastic straws and single-use
plastic cups, will stop by 2022. By 2027, 100% of plastic
waste will be reusable.
Similarly, in Indonesia, the Phipppines and Viet Nam,
many actions have been taken by both central and local
governments to reduce plastic pollution, addressing
both macro and microplastics pollution in aquatic
environments.
Rapid urbanisation, economic growth and significant
changes in production and consumption patterns have
contributed to the growing problem of riverine and
marine plastic litter as well as microplastics, not only at
national level but also at the regional level in ASEAN.
Since ASEAN Member States (AMS) are connected by
oceans and rivers (e.g. Mekong River), it is necessary to
establish regional and national policies in concordance
with neighbouring countries’ policies. Moreover, due to
the transboundary nature of plastic litter issues, any
single country solution will not be sufficient. There is a
strong need for regional collective efforts, strong
commitments from AMS, and new initiatives with
adequate funding mechanisms to be implemented
through region-wide collaborations.
Consequently, AMS formalised their commitment in
June 2018 to combating marine debris through the
adoption of the Bangkok Declaration on Combating
Marine Debris in ASEAN Region, and subsequently, the
ASEAN Framework of Action on Marine Debris, which
highlights the need for regional and national actions
with four key pillars, namely (i) policy support and
planning; (ii) research, innovation and capacity building;
(iii) public awareness, education and outreach; and (iv)
private sector engagement. In May 2020, AMS also
launched the ASEAN Regional Action Plan for
Combating Marine Debris in the ASEAN Member States,
which emphasised the need to address microplastic
pollution in the region.
At national and city level, great efforts are also
underway to tackle both riverine and marine plastic
pollution, with special attention on regulating or
planning for the elimination of single-use plastic
products and plastic packaging. For example, in
4. ASEAN national and regional frameworks for
tackling plastic pollution
Detecting smaller MPs is a challenge. Fibres are found
to be one of the major MPs in rivers as well as in
WWTPs (Bujaczek et al., 2021; Uurasjärvi et al., 2020),
but sampling and lab analysis of MPs below 100 µm
are not easily done, thus recent studies highlighted the
possibility of underestimating the concentration of
MPs in WWTP effluents (Ben-David et al., 2021;
Abeynayaka at el., 2020). Establishing a practical
sampling and analysis method for the smaller particles
is also needed.
Figure 5. Average microplastics flow in both liquid and sludge across different treatment processes within a wastewater
treatment plant (Source: Nikiema et al., 2020)
- 10 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
For effective implementation of the ASEAN Framework
of Action on Marine Debris and the the ASEAN
Regional Action Plan for Combating Marine Debris,
there is a need for strong political will from all AMS to
solve the issue. It is said that “Prevention is always
better than cleaning up” , considering time and
resources spent on a solution. Moreover, it is crucial to
address various issues along the plastic value chain
through the circular economy approach, from raw
material extraction, design, production, distribution,
excessive plastic consumption (especially single use
plastic products), collection/reuse/repair, to the
recycling stage. These stages are all essential to solve
this national, regional and global issue.
It is widely well-recognised that private financing can
play a major role in providing not only financial but
also operational solutions to these challenges (e.g.
research on plastic alternatives, materials and product
design, and business model innovation). This can
gradually complement public sector investments to
reduce the use of plastics, increase recycling, and
promote a circular economy (The World Bank, 2021).
Meanwhile, it is expected that the scientific community
will provide sufficient scientific evidence that supports
policymakers in developing effective measures and
evidence-based policies.
Furthermore, the following are recommended actions
for all ASEAN countries to take, based on the findings
from this paper, for establishing an MP-free water
environment.
• Install and optimise the performance of wastewater
treatment facilities in ASEAN countries
• Strictly control the discharge of wastewater
containing microplastics into aquatic environments
• Develop national quality standards related to
microplastics pollutants (standards for both effluent
and drinking water)
• Properly manage plastic waste to avoid leakage into
the water environment by improving municipal solid
waste collection, treatment and management
services
• Reduce the use of single-use plastic products and
replace them with alternative products
• Introduce an appropriate policy approach of
Extended Producer Responsibility to mitigate MP
pollution, especially in aquatic environments.
• Identifying alternative solutions to reduce leakages
of MP from textiles, personal care products, and
tire-wear particles emissions
5. The Way Forward
October 2018, the Government of Malaysia released its
Roadmap to Eliminate Single-use Plastics 2018 - 2030,
announcing a policy to eliminate plastic straws and
plastic bags by 2030. In Thailand, the Government
announced a Roadmap on Plastic Waste Management
2018-2030, with the aim of reducing and halting the use
of plastic and replacing it with environmentally-friendly
materials. Accordingly, three plastic products, including
plastic cap seals for water bottles, oxo-degradable
plastics and plastic microbeads, would be banned in
Thailand. The use of four other types of plastic,
including plastic bags less than 36 microns in thickness,
styrofoam food boxes, plastic straws and single-use
plastic cups, will stop by 2022. By 2027, 100% of plastic
waste will be reusable.
Similarly, in Indonesia, the Phipppines and Viet Nam,
many actions have been taken by both central and local
governments to reduce plastic pollution, addressing
both macro and microplastics pollution in aquatic
environments.
Rapid urbanisation, economic growth and significant
changes in production and consumption patterns have
contributed to the growing problem of riverine and
marine plastic litter as well as microplastics, not only at
national level but also at the regional level in ASEAN.
Since ASEAN Member States (AMS) are connected by
oceans and rivers (e.g. Mekong River), it is necessary to
establish regional and national policies in concordance
with neighbouring countries’ policies. Moreover, due to
the transboundary nature of plastic litter issues, any
single country solution will not be sufficient. There is a
strong need for regional collective efforts, strong
commitments from AMS, and new initiatives with
adequate funding mechanisms to be implemented
through region-wide collaborations.
Consequently, AMS formalised their commitment in
June 2018 to combating marine debris through the
adoption of the Bangkok Declaration on Combating
Marine Debris in ASEAN Region, and subsequently, the
ASEAN Framework of Action on Marine Debris, which
highlights the need for regional and national actions
with four key pillars, namely (i) policy support and
planning; (ii) research, innovation and capacity building;
(iii) public awareness, education and outreach; and (iv)
private sector engagement. In May 2020, AMS also
launched the ASEAN Regional Action Plan for
Combating Marine Debris in the ASEAN Member States,
which emphasised the need to address microplastic
pollution in the region.
At national and city level, great efforts are also
underway to tackle both riverine and marine plastic
pollution, with special attention on regulating or
planning for the elimination of single-use plastic
products and plastic packaging. For example, in
- 11 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
Rochman, C. M., Tahir, A., Williams, S. L., Baxa, D. V., Lam, R.,
Miller, J. T., Teh, F. C., Werorilangi, S., & Teh, S. J. (2015).
Anthropogenic debris in seafood: Plastic debris and fibers
from textiles in fish and bivalves sold for human
consumption. Scientific Reports, 5(September), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14340
Ryan, P. G. (2015). A Brief History of Marine Litter Research. In
M. Bergmann, L. Gutow, & M. Klages (Eds.), Marine
Anthropogenic Litter (pp. 1–25). Springer International
Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_1
Sarijan, S., Azman, S., Said, M. I. M., & Jamal, M. H. (2021).
Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: a recent review of
occurrence, analysis, potential impacts, and research needs.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(2),
1341–1356.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11171-7
Sarkar, D. J., Sarkar, S. D., Mukherjee, S., & Das, B. K. (2021).
Impact and fate of microplastics in the riverine ecosystem. In
M. Kumar, D. Snow, R. Honda, & S. Mukherjee (Eds.),
Contaminants in Drinking and Wastewater Sources (pp.
195–115). Springer.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4599-3_4
Schmidt, C., Krauth, T., & Wagner, S. (2017). Export of Plastic
Debris by Rivers into the Sea. Environmental Science and
Technology, 51(21), 12246–12253.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02368
Smith, M., Love, D. C., Rochman, C. M., & Neff, R. A. (2018).
Microplastics in Seafood and the Implications for Human
Health. Current Environmental Health Reports, 5, 375–386.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-018-0206-z
Stanes, E., & Gibson, C. (2017). Materials that linger: An
embodied geography of polyester clothes. Geoforum, 85
(January), 27–36.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.006
Su, L., Cai, H., Kolandhasamy, P., Wu, C., Rochman, C. M., &
Shi, H. (2018). Using the Asian clam as an indicator of
microplastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems.
Environmental Pollution, 234, 347–355.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.075
Sundt, P., Schulze, P.-E., & Syversen, F. (2014). Sources of
microplastic pollution to the marine environment.
https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/M
321/M321.pdf
Tanaka, K., & Takada, H. (2016). Microplastic fragments and
microbeads in digestive tracts of planktivorous fish from
urban coastal waters. Scientific Reports, 6(September), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34351
The World Bank. (2021). Concept Environmental and Social
Review Summary Concept Stage. In Southeast Asia Regional
Program on Combating Marine Plastics (SEA-MaP) (P175659).
http://www.worldbank.org/projects
Uurasjärvi, E., Hartikainen, S., Setälä, O., Lehtiniemi, M., &
Koistinen, A. (2020). Microplastic concentrations, size
distribution, and polymer types in the surface waters of a
northern European lake. Water Environment Research, 92(1),
149–156.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1229
Waller, C. L., Griffiths, H. J., Waluda, C. M., Thorpe, S. E., Loaiza,
I., Moreno, B., Pacherres, C. O., & Hughes, K. A. (2017).
Microplastics in the Antarctic marine system: An emerging
area of research. Science of the Total Environment, 598,
220–227.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.283
WWF. (2021). The lifecycle of plastics. Newsroom.
https://www.wwf.org.au/news/blogs/the-lifecycle-of-plastics#g
s.fvv9nl
Xu, X., Jian, Y., Xue, Y., Hou, Q., & Wang, L. P. (2019).
Microplastics in the wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs):
Occurrence and removal. Chemosphere, 235, 1089–1096.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.197
Zeri, C., Adamopoulou, A., Koi, A., Koutsikos, N., Lytras, E., &
Dimitriou, E. (2021). Rivers and wastewater-treatment plants
as microplastic pathways to eastern mediterranean waters:
First records for the aegean sea, Greece. Sustainability
(Switzerland), 13(10).
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105328
Leslie, H. A., Brandsma, S. H., van Velzen, M. J. M., & Vethaak,
A. D. (2017). Microplastics en route: Field measurements in
the Dutch river delta and Amsterdam canals, wastewater
treatment plants, North Sea sediments and biota.
Environment International, 101, 133–142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.01.018
Lim, X. Z. (2021). Microplastics are everywhere - but are they
harmful? Nature, 593(7857), 22–25.
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01143-3
Liu, Y., Zhang, J. Di, Cai, C. Y., He, Y., Chen, L. Y., Xiong, X.,
Huang, H. J., Tao, S., & Liu, W. X. (2020). Occurrence and
characteristics of microplastics in the Haihe River: An
investigation of a seagoing river flowing through a megacity
in northern China. Environmental Pollution, 262, 114261.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114261
Lusher, A., Hollman, P., & Mandoza-Hill, J. (2017).
Microplastics in fisheries and aquaculture. In FAO Fisheries
and Aquaculture Technical Paper (Vol. 615, Issue July).
http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7677e.pdf
Lusher, A. L., Tirelli, V., O’ Connor, I., & Officer, R. (2015).
Microplastics in Arctic polar waters: The first reported values
of particles in surface and sub-surface samples. Scientific
Reports, 5(September), 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14947
Miller, R. Z., Watts, A. J. R., Winslow, B. O., Galloway, T. S., &
Barrows, A. P. W. (2017). Mountains to the sea: River study of
plastic and non-plastic microfiber pollution in the northeast
USA. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 124(1), 245–251.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.028
Ngo, P. L., Pramanik, B. K., Shah, K., & Roychand, R. (2019).
Pathway, classification and removal efficiency of microplastics
in wastewater treatment plants. Environmental Pollution, 255.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113326
Nikiema, J., Mateo-Sagasta, J., Asiedu, Z., Saad, D., &
Lamizana, B. (2020). Water Pollution by Plastics and
Microplastics: A review of technical solutions from source to
sea.
https://www.unep.org/resources/report/water-pollution-plastic
s-and-microplastics-review-technical-solutions-source-sea
Osorio, E. D., Tanchuling, M. A. N., & Diola, M. B. L. D. (2021).
Microplastics Occurrence in Surface Waters and Sediments in
Five River Mouths of Manila Bay. Frontiers in Environmental
Science, 9(September), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.719274
Phuong, N. N., Fauvelle, V., Grenz, C., Ourgaud, M., Schmidt,
N., Strady, E., & Sempéré, R. (2021). Highlights from a review
of microplastics in marine sediments. Science of the Total
Environment, 777.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146225
Pirika. (2021). Research Solutions for Reducing Microplastic
Pollution.
https://en.plastic.research.pirika.org/
Prata, C. J., da Costa, J. P., Lopes, I., Duarte, A. C., &
Rocha-Santos, T. (2020). Environmental exposure to
microplastics : An overview on possible human health effects.
Science of the Total Environment, 702, 134455.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134455
Radityaningrum, A. D., Trihadiningrum, Y., Mar’ atusholihah,
Soedjono, E. S., & Herumurti, W. (2021). Microplastic
contamination in water supply and the removal efficiencies of
the treatment plants: A case of Surabaya City, Indonesia.
Journal of Water Process Engineering, 43(July), 102195.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102195
Ragusa, A., Svelato, A., Santacroce, C., Catalano, P.,
Notarstefano, V., Carnevali, O., Papa, F., Rongioletti, M. C. A.,
Baiocco, F., Draghi, S., D’ Amore, E., Rinaldo, D., Matta, M., &
Giorgini, E. (2021). Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics
in human placenta. Environment International, 146, 106274.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274
Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E., Falahudin, D., Peeters, E. T. H.
M., & Koelmans, A. A. (2018). Microplastic Effect Thresholds
for Freshwater Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Environmental
Science and Technology, 52(4), 2278–2286.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05367
Rhodes, C. J. (2018). Plastic pollution and potential solutions.
Science Progress, 101(3), 207–260.
https://doi.org/10.3184/003685018X15294876706211
British Plastic Federation. (2021). A History of Plastics.
https://www.bpf.co.uk/plastipedia/plastics_history/Default.aspx
Bujaczek, T., Kolter, S., Locky, D., & Ross, M. S. (2021).
Characterization of microplastics and anthropogenic fibers in
surface waters of the North Saskatchewan River, Alberta,
Canada. Facets, 6(1), 26–43.
https://doi.org/10.1139/FACETS-2020-0057
Constant, M., Ludwig, W., Kerhervé, P., Sola, J., Charrière, B.,
Sanchez-Vidal, A., Canals, M., & Heussner, S. (2020).
Microplastic fluxes in a large and a small Mediterranean river
catchments: The Têt and the Rhône, Northwestern
Mediterranean Sea. Science of the Total Environment, 716,
136984.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136984
Dris, R., Gasperi, J., Saad, M., Mirande, C., & Tassin, B. (2016).
Synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout: A source of
microplastics in the environment? Marine Pollution Bulletin,
104(1–2), 290–293.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.01.006
Frias, J. P. G. L., & Nash, R. (2019). Microplastics: Finding a
consensus on the definition. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 138
(November 2018), 145–147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.022
Fu, L., Li, J., Wang, G., Luan, Y., & Dai, W. (2021). Adsorption
behavior of organic pollutants on microplastics.
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 217(February),
112207.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112207
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use,
and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 3(7), 3–8.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782
Hann, S., Kershaw, P., Sherrington, C., Bapasola, A., Jamieson,
O., Cole, G., & Hickman, M. (2018). Investigating options for
reducing releases in the aquatic environment of microplastics
emitted by (but not intentionally added in) products. Report
for DG Env EC, Vol. 62, N(February), 335.
Horton, A. A., Jürgens, M. D., Lahive, E., van Bodegom, P. M.,
& Vijver, M. G. (2018). The influence of exposure and
physiology on microplastic ingestion by the freshwater fish
Rutilus rutilus (roach) in the River Thames, UK. Environmental
Pollution, 236, 188–194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.044
Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman,
M., Andrady, A., ... & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs
from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771.
Jemec, A., Horvat, P., Kunej, U., Bele, M., & Kržan, A. (2016).
Uptake and effects of microplastic textile fibers on freshwater
crustacean Daphnia magna. Environmental Pollution, 219,
201–209.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.037
Kadarudin, Yunus, A., Anas, A. M. A., Kurniawati, A., Juniar, M.
W., Wahyuni, A. S., & Annisa, A. N. (2020). Bangkok
declaration and awareness of ASEAN member countries: The
regional law of cleaning our oceans. Journal of Critical
Reviews, 7(19), 900–904.
https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.19.110
Kalčíková, G. (2020). Aquatic vascular plants – A forgotten
piece of nature in microplastic research. Environmental
Pollution, 262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114354
Kentin, E., & Kaarto, H. (2018). An EU ban on microplastics in
cosmetic products and the right to regulate. Review of
European, Comparative and International Environmental Law,
27(3), 254–266.
https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12269
Kristanto, N. A. A. (2018). Study of Potential Microplastics on
Surabaya River Fishes.
http://ecoton.or.id/2019/04/23/penelitian-mikroplastik/
Kumar, R., Sharma, P., Manna, C., & Jain, M. (2021).
Abundance, interaction, ingestion, ecological concerns, and
mitigation policies of microplastic pollution in riverine
ecosystem: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 782,
146695.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146695
Lahens, L., Strady, E., Kieu-le, T., Dris, R., Boukerma, K., Rinnert,
E., Gasperi, J., & Tassin, B. (2018). Macroplastic and
microplastic contamination assessment of a tropical river (
Saigon River , Vietnam ) transversed by a developing
megacity *. Environmental Pollution, 236, 661–671.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.005
Lebreton, L. C. M., Van Der Zwet, J., Damsteeg, J. W., Slat, B.,
Andrady, A., & Reisser, J. (2017). River plastic emissions to the
world’ s oceans. Nature Communications, 8, 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15611
Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2018). Treatment characteristics of
microplastics at biological sewage treatment facilities in
Korea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 137(October), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.050
Schächtele (Eds.), Heinrich Böll Foundation and Break Free
From Plastic (2nd ed., Vol. 69, Issue 4). Heinrich Böll
Foundation.
Barnes, D. K. A., Galgani, F., Thompson, R. C., & Barlaz, M.
(2009). Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in
global environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 1985–1998.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0205
Barra, R., & Leonard, S. A. (2018). Plastics and the circular
economy (Issue June).
https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/publications/PLASTI
CS for posting.pdf
Bean, M. J. (1987). Legal strategies for reducing persistent
plastics in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin,
18(6 SUPPL. B), 357–360.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X
(87)80026-7
Bellasi, A., Binda, G., Pozzi, A., Galafassi, S., Volta, P., &
Bettinetti, R. (2020). Microplastic contamination in freshwater
environments: A review, focusing on interactions with
sediments and benthic organisms. Environments - MDPI, 7(4).
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments7040030
Ben-David, E. A., Habibi, M., Haddad, E., Hasanin, M., Angel, D.
L., Booth, A. M., & Sabbah, I. (2021). Microplastic distributions
in a domestic wastewater treatment plant: Removal efficiency,
seasonal variation and influence of sampling technique.
Science of the Total Environment, 752, 141880.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141880
Borongan, G., Kashyap, P., & Renaud, P. (2018). Managing
Packaging Waste in the ASEAN Region,.
https://www.giz.de/de/downloads/giz2018_ASEAN-Packaging-
Waste_web.pdf
Boucher, J., & Friot, D. (2017). Primary microplastics in the
oceans: A global evaluation of sources. In Primary
microplastics in the oceans: A global evaluation of sources.
https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2017.01.en
References
Abeynayaka, A., & Itsubo, N. (2019). A framework to
incorporate aquatic plastic into life cycle assessment of plastic
products. EcoDesing 2019 International Symposium, 261–265.
Abeynayaka, A., Werellagama, I., Ngoc-Bao, P., Hengesbaugh,
M., Gajanayake, P., Nallaperuma, B., Karkour, S., Xuan-Thanh,
B., & Itsubo, N. (In Press). Microplastics in Wastewater
Treatment Plants. In Xuan-Thanh Bui, Dinh Duc Nguyen,
Phuoc Dan Nguyen, Huu Hao Ngo, & Ashok Pandey (Eds.),
Advances in Biological Wastewater Treatment Systems:
Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering
(1st ed., Vol. 26). Elsevier.
Abeynayaka, Amila. (2021). Plastic Spills in Maritime
Transportation and Consequences. The Green Guardian.
https://srilankagbc.org/ecosystem-restoration/
Abeynayaka, Amila, Kojima, F., Miwa, Y., Ito, N., Nihei, Y.,
Fukunaga, Y., Yashima, Y., & Itsubo, N. (2020). Rapid sampling
of suspended and floating microplastics in challenging
riverine and coastal water environments in Japan. Water
(Switzerland), 12(7), 1–21.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071903
Ahechti, M., Benomar, M., Alami, M. El, & Mendiguchía, C.
(2020). Metal adsorption by microplastics in aquatic
environments under controlled conditions: exposure time, pH
and salinity. International Journal of Environmental Analytical
Chemistry.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.1733546
Alegado, J. E., Aliño, J. M., Chow, S. C. F., Diola, M. B. L.,
Gamaralalage, P. J. D., Gurrero, L., Hengesbaugh, M.,
Hernandez, V., Ishimura, Y., Kato, M., Kim, E., Liu, C.,
Moinuddin, M., Moon, D., Okuno, M., Olsen, S. H., Pelogio, G.,
Pey, P., Ngoc Bao, P., … Peer. (2021). PLASTIC ATLAS - Facts
and figures about the world of synthetic polymers (Asia
Edition) (K. Li & C. Kunze (eds.)). Heinrich Boll Stiftung.
Arkin, C., Azoulay, D., Caterbow, A., Chemnitz, C., Duran, C.,
Eriksen, M., Feit, S., Fernandez, M., Flood, C., Fuhr, L.,
Grimberg, E., Gürtler, S., Guerrero, L., Hausmann, J.,
Hernandez, V., Kallee, U., Keith, C., Knoblauch, D., Lauwigi, C.,
… Ziebarth, N. (2019). Plastic Atlas. In L. Fuhr, M. Franklin, & K.
- 12 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
Rochman, C. M., Tahir, A., Williams, S. L., Baxa, D. V., Lam, R.,
Miller, J. T., Teh, F. C., Werorilangi, S., & Teh, S. J. (2015).
Anthropogenic debris in seafood: Plastic debris and fibers
from textiles in fish and bivalves sold for human
consumption. Scientific Reports, 5(September), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14340
Ryan, P. G. (2015). A Brief History of Marine Litter Research. In
M. Bergmann, L. Gutow, & M. Klages (Eds.), Marine
Anthropogenic Litter (pp. 1–25). Springer International
Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_1
Sarijan, S., Azman, S., Said, M. I. M., & Jamal, M. H. (2021).
Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: a recent review of
occurrence, analysis, potential impacts, and research needs.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(2),
1341–1356.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11171-7
Sarkar, D. J., Sarkar, S. D., Mukherjee, S., & Das, B. K. (2021).
Impact and fate of microplastics in the riverine ecosystem. In
M. Kumar, D. Snow, R. Honda, & S. Mukherjee (Eds.),
Contaminants in Drinking and Wastewater Sources (pp.
195–115). Springer.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4599-3_4
Schmidt, C., Krauth, T., & Wagner, S. (2017). Export of Plastic
Debris by Rivers into the Sea. Environmental Science and
Technology, 51(21), 12246–12253.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02368
Smith, M., Love, D. C., Rochman, C. M., & Neff, R. A. (2018).
Microplastics in Seafood and the Implications for Human
Health. Current Environmental Health Reports, 5, 375–386.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-018-0206-z
Stanes, E., & Gibson, C. (2017). Materials that linger: An
embodied geography of polyester clothes. Geoforum, 85
(January), 27–36.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.006
Su, L., Cai, H., Kolandhasamy, P., Wu, C., Rochman, C. M., &
Shi, H. (2018). Using the Asian clam as an indicator of
microplastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems.
Environmental Pollution, 234, 347–355.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.075
Sundt, P., Schulze, P.-E., & Syversen, F. (2014). Sources of
microplastic pollution to the marine environment.
https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/M
321/M321.pdf
Tanaka, K., & Takada, H. (2016). Microplastic fragments and
microbeads in digestive tracts of planktivorous fish from
urban coastal waters. Scientific Reports, 6(September), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34351
The World Bank. (2021). Concept Environmental and Social
Review Summary Concept Stage. In Southeast Asia Regional
Program on Combating Marine Plastics (SEA-MaP) (P175659).
http://www.worldbank.org/projects
Uurasjärvi, E., Hartikainen, S., Setälä, O., Lehtiniemi, M., &
Koistinen, A. (2020). Microplastic concentrations, size
distribution, and polymer types in the surface waters of a
northern European lake. Water Environment Research, 92(1),
149–156.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1229
Waller, C. L., Griffiths, H. J., Waluda, C. M., Thorpe, S. E., Loaiza,
I., Moreno, B., Pacherres, C. O., & Hughes, K. A. (2017).
Microplastics in the Antarctic marine system: An emerging
area of research. Science of the Total Environment, 598,
220–227.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.283
WWF. (2021). The lifecycle of plastics. Newsroom.
https://www.wwf.org.au/news/blogs/the-lifecycle-of-plastics#g
s.fvv9nl
Xu, X., Jian, Y., Xue, Y., Hou, Q., & Wang, L. P. (2019).
Microplastics in the wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs):
Occurrence and removal. Chemosphere, 235, 1089–1096.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.197
Zeri, C., Adamopoulou, A., Koi, A., Koutsikos, N., Lytras, E., &
Dimitriou, E. (2021). Rivers and wastewater-treatment plants
as microplastic pathways to eastern mediterranean waters:
First records for the aegean sea, Greece. Sustainability
(Switzerland), 13(10).
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105328
Leslie, H. A., Brandsma, S. H., van Velzen, M. J. M., & Vethaak,
A. D. (2017). Microplastics en route: Field measurements in
the Dutch river delta and Amsterdam canals, wastewater
treatment plants, North Sea sediments and biota.
Environment International, 101, 133–142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.01.018
Lim, X. Z. (2021). Microplastics are everywhere - but are they
harmful? Nature, 593(7857), 22–25.
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01143-3
Liu, Y., Zhang, J. Di, Cai, C. Y., He, Y., Chen, L. Y., Xiong, X.,
Huang, H. J., Tao, S., & Liu, W. X. (2020). Occurrence and
characteristics of microplastics in the Haihe River: An
investigation of a seagoing river flowing through a megacity
in northern China. Environmental Pollution, 262, 114261.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114261
Lusher, A., Hollman, P., & Mandoza-Hill, J. (2017).
Microplastics in fisheries and aquaculture. In FAO Fisheries
and Aquaculture Technical Paper (Vol. 615, Issue July).
http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7677e.pdf
Lusher, A. L., Tirelli, V., O’ Connor, I., & Officer, R. (2015).
Microplastics in Arctic polar waters: The first reported values
of particles in surface and sub-surface samples. Scientific
Reports, 5(September), 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14947
Miller, R. Z., Watts, A. J. R., Winslow, B. O., Galloway, T. S., &
Barrows, A. P. W. (2017). Mountains to the sea: River study of
plastic and non-plastic microfiber pollution in the northeast
USA. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 124(1), 245–251.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.028
Ngo, P. L., Pramanik, B. K., Shah, K., & Roychand, R. (2019).
Pathway, classification and removal efficiency of microplastics
in wastewater treatment plants. Environmental Pollution, 255.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113326
Nikiema, J., Mateo-Sagasta, J., Asiedu, Z., Saad, D., &
Lamizana, B. (2020). Water Pollution by Plastics and
Microplastics: A review of technical solutions from source to
sea.
https://www.unep.org/resources/report/water-pollution-plastic
s-and-microplastics-review-technical-solutions-source-sea
Osorio, E. D., Tanchuling, M. A. N., & Diola, M. B. L. D. (2021).
Microplastics Occurrence in Surface Waters and Sediments in
Five River Mouths of Manila Bay. Frontiers in Environmental
Science, 9(September), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.719274
Phuong, N. N., Fauvelle, V., Grenz, C., Ourgaud, M., Schmidt,
N., Strady, E., & Sempéré, R. (2021). Highlights from a review
of microplastics in marine sediments. Science of the Total
Environment, 777.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146225
Pirika. (2021). Research Solutions for Reducing Microplastic
Pollution.
https://en.plastic.research.pirika.org/
Prata, C. J., da Costa, J. P., Lopes, I., Duarte, A. C., &
Rocha-Santos, T. (2020). Environmental exposure to
microplastics : An overview on possible human health effects.
Science of the Total Environment, 702, 134455.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134455
Radityaningrum, A. D., Trihadiningrum, Y., Mar’ atusholihah,
Soedjono, E. S., & Herumurti, W. (2021). Microplastic
contamination in water supply and the removal efficiencies of
the treatment plants: A case of Surabaya City, Indonesia.
Journal of Water Process Engineering, 43(July), 102195.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102195
Ragusa, A., Svelato, A., Santacroce, C., Catalano, P.,
Notarstefano, V., Carnevali, O., Papa, F., Rongioletti, M. C. A.,
Baiocco, F., Draghi, S., D’ Amore, E., Rinaldo, D., Matta, M., &
Giorgini, E. (2021). Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics
in human placenta. Environment International, 146, 106274.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274
Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E., Falahudin, D., Peeters, E. T. H.
M., & Koelmans, A. A. (2018). Microplastic Effect Thresholds
for Freshwater Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Environmental
Science and Technology, 52(4), 2278–2286.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05367
Rhodes, C. J. (2018). Plastic pollution and potential solutions.
Science Progress, 101(3), 207–260.
https://doi.org/10.3184/003685018X15294876706211
British Plastic Federation. (2021). A History of Plastics.
https://www.bpf.co.uk/plastipedia/plastics_history/Default.aspx
Bujaczek, T., Kolter, S., Locky, D., & Ross, M. S. (2021).
Characterization of microplastics and anthropogenic fibers in
surface waters of the North Saskatchewan River, Alberta,
Canada. Facets, 6(1), 26–43.
https://doi.org/10.1139/FACETS-2020-0057
Constant, M., Ludwig, W., Kerhervé, P., Sola, J., Charrière, B.,
Sanchez-Vidal, A., Canals, M., & Heussner, S. (2020).
Microplastic fluxes in a large and a small Mediterranean river
catchments: The Têt and the Rhône, Northwestern
Mediterranean Sea. Science of the Total Environment, 716,
136984.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136984
Dris, R., Gasperi, J., Saad, M., Mirande, C., & Tassin, B. (2016).
Synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout: A source of
microplastics in the environment? Marine Pollution Bulletin,
104(1–2), 290–293.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.01.006
Frias, J. P. G. L., & Nash, R. (2019). Microplastics: Finding a
consensus on the definition. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 138
(November 2018), 145–147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.022
Fu, L., Li, J., Wang, G., Luan, Y., & Dai, W. (2021). Adsorption
behavior of organic pollutants on microplastics.
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 217(February),
112207.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112207
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use,
and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 3(7), 3–8.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782
Hann, S., Kershaw, P., Sherrington, C., Bapasola, A., Jamieson,
O., Cole, G., & Hickman, M. (2018). Investigating options for
reducing releases in the aquatic environment of microplastics
emitted by (but not intentionally added in) products. Report
for DG Env EC, Vol. 62, N(February), 335.
Horton, A. A., Jürgens, M. D., Lahive, E., van Bodegom, P. M.,
& Vijver, M. G. (2018). The influence of exposure and
physiology on microplastic ingestion by the freshwater fish
Rutilus rutilus (roach) in the River Thames, UK. Environmental
Pollution, 236, 188–194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.044
Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman,
M., Andrady, A., ... & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs
from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771.
Jemec, A., Horvat, P., Kunej, U., Bele, M., & Kržan, A. (2016).
Uptake and effects of microplastic textile fibers on freshwater
crustacean Daphnia magna. Environmental Pollution, 219,
201–209.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.037
Kadarudin, Yunus, A., Anas, A. M. A., Kurniawati, A., Juniar, M.
W., Wahyuni, A. S., & Annisa, A. N. (2020). Bangkok
declaration and awareness of ASEAN member countries: The
regional law of cleaning our oceans. Journal of Critical
Reviews, 7(19), 900–904.
https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.19.110
Kalčíková, G. (2020). Aquatic vascular plants – A forgotten
piece of nature in microplastic research. Environmental
Pollution, 262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114354
Kentin, E., & Kaarto, H. (2018). An EU ban on microplastics in
cosmetic products and the right to regulate. Review of
European, Comparative and International Environmental Law,
27(3), 254–266.
https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12269
Kristanto, N. A. A. (2018). Study of Potential Microplastics on
Surabaya River Fishes.
http://ecoton.or.id/2019/04/23/penelitian-mikroplastik/
Kumar, R., Sharma, P., Manna, C., & Jain, M. (2021).
Abundance, interaction, ingestion, ecological concerns, and
mitigation policies of microplastic pollution in riverine
ecosystem: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 782,
146695.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146695
Lahens, L., Strady, E., Kieu-le, T., Dris, R., Boukerma, K., Rinnert,
E., Gasperi, J., & Tassin, B. (2018). Macroplastic and
microplastic contamination assessment of a tropical river (
Saigon River , Vietnam ) transversed by a developing
megacity *. Environmental Pollution, 236, 661–671.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.005
Lebreton, L. C. M., Van Der Zwet, J., Damsteeg, J. W., Slat, B.,
Andrady, A., & Reisser, J. (2017). River plastic emissions to the
world’ s oceans. Nature Communications, 8, 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15611
Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2018). Treatment characteristics of
microplastics at biological sewage treatment facilities in
Korea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 137(October), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.050
Abeynayaka, A., & Itsubo, N. (2019). A framework to
incorporate aquatic plastic into life cycle assessment of plastic
products. EcoDesing 2019 International Symposium, 261–265.
Abeynayaka, A., Werellagama, I., Ngoc-Bao, P., Hengesbaugh,
M., Gajanayake, P., Nallaperuma, B., Karkour, S., Xuan-Thanh,
B., & Itsubo, N. (2021).
Microplastics in Wastewater Treatment Plants. In Advances in
Biological Wastewater Treatment Systems. In Advances in
Biological Wastewater Treatment Systems (In press). Elsevier.
Abeynayaka, Amila. (2021). Plastic Spills in Maritime
Transportation and Consequences. The Green Guardian.
https://srilankagbc.org/ecosystem-restoration/
Abeynayaka, Amila, Kojima, F., Miwa, Y., Ito, N., Nihei, Y.,
Fukunaga, Y., Yashima, Y., & Itsubo, N. (2020). Rapid sampling
of suspended and floating microplastics in challenging
riverine and coastal water environments in Japan. Water
(Switzerland), 12(7), 1–21.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071903
Ahechti, M., Benomar, M., Alami, M. El, & Mendiguchía, C.
(2020). Metal adsorption by microplastics in aquatic
environments under controlled conditions: exposure time, pH
and salinity. International Journal of Environmental Analytical
Chemistry.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.1733546
Alegado, J. E., Aliño, J. M., Chow, S. C. F., Diola, M. B. L.,
Gamaralalage, P. J. D., Gurrero, L., Hengesbaugh, M.,
Hernandez, V., Ishimura, Y., Kato, M., Kim, E., Liu, C.,
Moinuddin, M., Moon, D., Okuno, M., Olsen, S. H., Pelogio, G.,
Pey, P., Ngoc Bao, P., … Peer. (2021). PLASTIC ATLAS - Facts
and figures about the world of synthetic polymers (Asia
Edition) (K. Li & C. Kunze (eds.)). Heinrich Boll Stiftung.
Arkin, C., Azoulay, D., Caterbow, A., Chemnitz, C., Duran, C.,
Eriksen, M., Feit, S., Fernandez, M., Flood, C., Fuhr, L.,
Grimberg, E., Gürtler, S., Guerrero, L., Hausmann, J.,
Hernandez, V., Kallee, U., Keith, C., Knoblauch, D., Lauwigi, C.,
… Ziebarth, N. (2019). Plastic Atlas. In L. Fuhr, M. Franklin, & K.
Schächtele (Eds.), Heinrich Böll Foundation and Break Free
From Plastic (2nd ed., Vol. 69, Issue 4). Heinrich Böll
Foundation.
Barnes, D. K. A., Galgani, F., Thompson, R. C., & Barlaz, M.
(2009). Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in
global environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 1985–1998.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0205
Barra, R., & Leonard, S. A. (2018). Plastics and the circular
economy (Issue June).
https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/publications/PLASTI
CS for posting.pdf
Bean, M. J. (1987). Legal strategies for reducing persistent
plastics in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin,
18(6 SUPPL. B), 357–360.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X
(87)80026-7
Bellasi, A., Binda, G., Pozzi, A., Galafassi, S., Volta, P., &
Bettinetti, R. (2020). Microplastic contamination in freshwater
environments: A review, focusing on interactions with
sediments and benthic organisms. Environments - MDPI, 7(4).
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments7040030
Ben-David, E. A., Habibi, M., Haddad, E., Hasanin, M., Angel, D.
L., Booth, A. M., & Sabbah, I. (2021). Microplastic distributions
in a domestic wastewater treatment plant: Removal efficiency,
seasonal variation and influence of sampling technique.
Science of the Total Environment, 752, 141880.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141880
Borongan, G., Kashyap, P., & Renaud, P. (2018). Managing
Packaging Waste in the ASEAN Region,.
https://www.giz.de/de/downloads/giz2018_ASEAN-Packaging-
Waste_web.pdf
Boucher, J., & Friot, D. (2017). Primary microplastics in the
oceans: A global evaluation of sources. In Primary
microplastics in the oceans: A global evaluation of sources.
https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2017.01.en
- 13 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
Rochman, C. M., Tahir, A., Williams, S. L., Baxa, D. V., Lam, R.,
Miller, J. T., Teh, F. C., Werorilangi, S., & Teh, S. J. (2015).
Anthropogenic debris in seafood: Plastic debris and fibers
from textiles in fish and bivalves sold for human
consumption. Scientific Reports, 5(September), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14340
Ryan, P. G. (2015). A Brief History of Marine Litter Research. In
M. Bergmann, L. Gutow, & M. Klages (Eds.), Marine
Anthropogenic Litter (pp. 1–25). Springer International
Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_1
Sarijan, S., Azman, S., Said, M. I. M., & Jamal, M. H. (2021).
Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: a recent review of
occurrence, analysis, potential impacts, and research needs.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(2),
1341–1356.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11171-7
Sarkar, D. J., Sarkar, S. D., Mukherjee, S., & Das, B. K. (2021).
Impact and fate of microplastics in the riverine ecosystem. In
M. Kumar, D. Snow, R. Honda, & S. Mukherjee (Eds.),
Contaminants in Drinking and Wastewater Sources (pp.
195–115). Springer.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4599-3_4
Schmidt, C., Krauth, T., & Wagner, S. (2017). Export of Plastic
Debris by Rivers into the Sea. Environmental Science and
Technology, 51(21), 12246–12253.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02368
Smith, M., Love, D. C., Rochman, C. M., & Neff, R. A. (2018).
Microplastics in Seafood and the Implications for Human
Health. Current Environmental Health Reports, 5, 375–386.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-018-0206-z
Stanes, E., & Gibson, C. (2017). Materials that linger: An
embodied geography of polyester clothes. Geoforum, 85
(January), 27–36.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.006
Su, L., Cai, H., Kolandhasamy, P., Wu, C., Rochman, C. M., &
Shi, H. (2018). Using the Asian clam as an indicator of
microplastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems.
Environmental Pollution, 234, 347–355.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.075
Sundt, P., Schulze, P.-E., & Syversen, F. (2014). Sources of
microplastic pollution to the marine environment.
https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/M
321/M321.pdf
Tanaka, K., & Takada, H. (2016). Microplastic fragments and
microbeads in digestive tracts of planktivorous fish from
urban coastal waters. Scientific Reports, 6(September), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34351
The World Bank. (2021). Concept Environmental and Social
Review Summary Concept Stage. In Southeast Asia Regional
Program on Combating Marine Plastics (SEA-MaP) (P175659).
http://www.worldbank.org/projects
Uurasjärvi, E., Hartikainen, S., Setälä, O., Lehtiniemi, M., &
Koistinen, A. (2020). Microplastic concentrations, size
distribution, and polymer types in the surface waters of a
northern European lake. Water Environment Research, 92(1),
149–156.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1229
Waller, C. L., Griffiths, H. J., Waluda, C. M., Thorpe, S. E., Loaiza,
I., Moreno, B., Pacherres, C. O., & Hughes, K. A. (2017).
Microplastics in the Antarctic marine system: An emerging
area of research. Science of the Total Environment, 598,
220–227.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.283
WWF. (2021). The lifecycle of plastics. Newsroom.
https://www.wwf.org.au/news/blogs/the-lifecycle-of-plastics#g
s.fvv9nl
Xu, X., Jian, Y., Xue, Y., Hou, Q., & Wang, L. P. (2019).
Microplastics in the wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs):
Occurrence and removal. Chemosphere, 235, 1089–1096.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.197
Zeri, C., Adamopoulou, A., Koi, A., Koutsikos, N., Lytras, E., &
Dimitriou, E. (2021). Rivers and wastewater-treatment plants
as microplastic pathways to eastern mediterranean waters:
First records for the aegean sea, Greece. Sustainability
(Switzerland), 13(10).
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105328
Leslie, H. A., Brandsma, S. H., van Velzen, M. J. M., & Vethaak,
A. D. (2017). Microplastics en route: Field measurements in
the Dutch river delta and Amsterdam canals, wastewater
treatment plants, North Sea sediments and biota.
Environment International, 101, 133–142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.01.018
Lim, X. Z. (2021). Microplastics are everywhere - but are they
harmful? Nature, 593(7857), 22–25.
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01143-3
Liu, Y., Zhang, J. Di, Cai, C. Y., He, Y., Chen, L. Y., Xiong, X.,
Huang, H. J., Tao, S., & Liu, W. X. (2020). Occurrence and
characteristics of microplastics in the Haihe River: An
investigation of a seagoing river flowing through a megacity
in northern China. Environmental Pollution, 262, 114261.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114261
Lusher, A., Hollman, P., & Mandoza-Hill, J. (2017).
Microplastics in fisheries and aquaculture. In FAO Fisheries
and Aquaculture Technical Paper (Vol. 615, Issue July).
http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7677e.pdf
Lusher, A. L., Tirelli, V., O’ Connor, I., & Officer, R. (2015).
Microplastics in Arctic polar waters: The first reported values
of particles in surface and sub-surface samples. Scientific
Reports, 5(September), 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14947
Miller, R. Z., Watts, A. J. R., Winslow, B. O., Galloway, T. S., &
Barrows, A. P. W. (2017). Mountains to the sea: River study of
plastic and non-plastic microfiber pollution in the northeast
USA. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 124(1), 245–251.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.028
Ngo, P. L., Pramanik, B. K., Shah, K., & Roychand, R. (2019).
Pathway, classification and removal efficiency of microplastics
in wastewater treatment plants. Environmental Pollution, 255.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113326
Nikiema, J., Mateo-Sagasta, J., Asiedu, Z., Saad, D., &
Lamizana, B. (2020). Water Pollution by Plastics and
Microplastics: A review of technical solutions from source to
sea.
https://www.unep.org/resources/report/water-pollution-plastic
s-and-microplastics-review-technical-solutions-source-sea
Osorio, E. D., Tanchuling, M. A. N., & Diola, M. B. L. D. (2021).
Microplastics Occurrence in Surface Waters and Sediments in
Five River Mouths of Manila Bay. Frontiers in Environmental
Science, 9(September), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.719274
Phuong, N. N., Fauvelle, V., Grenz, C., Ourgaud, M., Schmidt,
N., Strady, E., & Sempéré, R. (2021). Highlights from a review
of microplastics in marine sediments. Science of the Total
Environment, 777.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146225
Pirika. (2021). Research Solutions for Reducing Microplastic
Pollution.
https://en.plastic.research.pirika.org/
Prata, C. J., da Costa, J. P., Lopes, I., Duarte, A. C., &
Rocha-Santos, T. (2020). Environmental exposure to
microplastics : An overview on possible human health effects.
Science of the Total Environment, 702, 134455.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134455
Radityaningrum, A. D., Trihadiningrum, Y., Mar’ atusholihah,
Soedjono, E. S., & Herumurti, W. (2021). Microplastic
contamination in water supply and the removal efficiencies of
the treatment plants: A case of Surabaya City, Indonesia.
Journal of Water Process Engineering, 43(July), 102195.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102195
Ragusa, A., Svelato, A., Santacroce, C., Catalano, P.,
Notarstefano, V., Carnevali, O., Papa, F., Rongioletti, M. C. A.,
Baiocco, F., Draghi, S., D’ Amore, E., Rinaldo, D., Matta, M., &
Giorgini, E. (2021). Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics
in human placenta. Environment International, 146, 106274.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274
Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E., Falahudin, D., Peeters, E. T. H.
M., & Koelmans, A. A. (2018). Microplastic Effect Thresholds
for Freshwater Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Environmental
Science and Technology, 52(4), 2278–2286.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05367
Rhodes, C. J. (2018). Plastic pollution and potential solutions.
Science Progress, 101(3), 207–260.
https://doi.org/10.3184/003685018X15294876706211
British Plastic Federation. (2021). A History of Plastics.
https://www.bpf.co.uk/plastipedia/plastics_history/Default.aspx
Bujaczek, T., Kolter, S., Locky, D., & Ross, M. S. (2021).
Characterization of microplastics and anthropogenic fibers in
surface waters of the North Saskatchewan River, Alberta,
Canada. Facets, 6(1), 26–43.
https://doi.org/10.1139/FACETS-2020-0057
Constant, M., Ludwig, W., Kerhervé, P., Sola, J., Charrière, B.,
Sanchez-Vidal, A., Canals, M., & Heussner, S. (2020).
Microplastic fluxes in a large and a small Mediterranean river
catchments: The Têt and the Rhône, Northwestern
Mediterranean Sea. Science of the Total Environment, 716,
136984.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136984
Dris, R., Gasperi, J., Saad, M., Mirande, C., & Tassin, B. (2016).
Synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout: A source of
microplastics in the environment? Marine Pollution Bulletin,
104(1–2), 290–293.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.01.006
Frias, J. P. G. L., & Nash, R. (2019). Microplastics: Finding a
consensus on the definition. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 138
(November 2018), 145–147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.022
Fu, L., Li, J., Wang, G., Luan, Y., & Dai, W. (2021). Adsorption
behavior of organic pollutants on microplastics.
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 217(February),
112207.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112207
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use,
and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 3(7), 3–8.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782
Hann, S., Kershaw, P., Sherrington, C., Bapasola, A., Jamieson,
O., Cole, G., & Hickman, M. (2018). Investigating options for
reducing releases in the aquatic environment of microplastics
emitted by (but not intentionally added in) products. Report
for DG Env EC, Vol. 62, N(February), 335.
Horton, A. A., Jürgens, M. D., Lahive, E., van Bodegom, P. M.,
& Vijver, M. G. (2018). The influence of exposure and
physiology on microplastic ingestion by the freshwater fish
Rutilus rutilus (roach) in the River Thames, UK. Environmental
Pollution, 236, 188–194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.044
Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman,
M., Andrady, A., ... & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs
from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771.
Jemec, A., Horvat, P., Kunej, U., Bele, M., & Kržan, A. (2016).
Uptake and effects of microplastic textile fibers on freshwater
crustacean Daphnia magna. Environmental Pollution, 219,
201–209.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.037
Kadarudin, Yunus, A., Anas, A. M. A., Kurniawati, A., Juniar, M.
W., Wahyuni, A. S., & Annisa, A. N. (2020). Bangkok
declaration and awareness of ASEAN member countries: The
regional law of cleaning our oceans. Journal of Critical
Reviews, 7(19), 900–904.
https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.19.110
Kalčíková, G. (2020). Aquatic vascular plants – A forgotten
piece of nature in microplastic research. Environmental
Pollution, 262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114354
Kentin, E., & Kaarto, H. (2018). An EU ban on microplastics in
cosmetic products and the right to regulate. Review of
European, Comparative and International Environmental Law,
27(3), 254–266.
https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12269
Kristanto, N. A. A. (2018). Study of Potential Microplastics on
Surabaya River Fishes.
http://ecoton.or.id/2019/04/23/penelitian-mikroplastik/
Kumar, R., Sharma, P., Manna, C., & Jain, M. (2021).
Abundance, interaction, ingestion, ecological concerns, and
mitigation policies of microplastic pollution in riverine
ecosystem: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 782,
146695.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146695
Lahens, L., Strady, E., Kieu-le, T., Dris, R., Boukerma, K., Rinnert,
E., Gasperi, J., & Tassin, B. (2018). Macroplastic and
microplastic contamination assessment of a tropical river (
Saigon River , Vietnam ) transversed by a developing
megacity *. Environmental Pollution, 236, 661–671.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.005
Lebreton, L. C. M., Van Der Zwet, J., Damsteeg, J. W., Slat, B.,
Andrady, A., & Reisser, J. (2017). River plastic emissions to the
world’ s oceans. Nature Communications, 8, 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15611
Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2018). Treatment characteristics of
microplastics at biological sewage treatment facilities in
Korea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 137(October), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.050
Abeynayaka, A., & Itsubo, N. (2019). A framework to
incorporate aquatic plastic into life cycle assessment of plastic
products. EcoDesing 2019 International Symposium, 261–265.
Abeynayaka, A., Werellagama, I., Ngoc-Bao, P., Hengesbaugh,
M., Gajanayake, P., Nallaperuma, B., Karkour, S., Xuan-Thanh,
B., & Itsubo, N. (2021).
Microplastics in Wastewater Treatment Plants. In Advances in
Biological Wastewater Treatment Systems. In Advances in
Biological Wastewater Treatment Systems (In press). Elsevier.
Abeynayaka, Amila. (2021). Plastic Spills in Maritime
Transportation and Consequences. The Green Guardian.
https://srilankagbc.org/ecosystem-restoration/
Abeynayaka, Amila, Kojima, F., Miwa, Y., Ito, N., Nihei, Y.,
Fukunaga, Y., Yashima, Y., & Itsubo, N. (2020). Rapid sampling
of suspended and floating microplastics in challenging
riverine and coastal water environments in Japan. Water
(Switzerland), 12(7), 1–21.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071903
Ahechti, M., Benomar, M., Alami, M. El, & Mendiguchía, C.
(2020). Metal adsorption by microplastics in aquatic
environments under controlled conditions: exposure time, pH
and salinity. International Journal of Environmental Analytical
Chemistry.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.1733546
Alegado, J. E., Aliño, J. M., Chow, S. C. F., Diola, M. B. L.,
Gamaralalage, P. J. D., Gurrero, L., Hengesbaugh, M.,
Hernandez, V., Ishimura, Y., Kato, M., Kim, E., Liu, C.,
Moinuddin, M., Moon, D., Okuno, M., Olsen, S. H., Pelogio, G.,
Pey, P., Ngoc Bao, P., … Peer. (2021). PLASTIC ATLAS - Facts
and figures about the world of synthetic polymers (Asia
Edition) (K. Li & C. Kunze (eds.)). Heinrich Boll Stiftung.
Arkin, C., Azoulay, D., Caterbow, A., Chemnitz, C., Duran, C.,
Eriksen, M., Feit, S., Fernandez, M., Flood, C., Fuhr, L.,
Grimberg, E., Gürtler, S., Guerrero, L., Hausmann, J.,
Hernandez, V., Kallee, U., Keith, C., Knoblauch, D., Lauwigi, C.,
… Ziebarth, N. (2019). Plastic Atlas. In L. Fuhr, M. Franklin, & K.
Schächtele (Eds.), Heinrich Böll Foundation and Break Free
From Plastic (2nd ed., Vol. 69, Issue 4). Heinrich Böll
Foundation.
Barnes, D. K. A., Galgani, F., Thompson, R. C., & Barlaz, M.
(2009). Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in
global environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 1985–1998.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0205
Barra, R., & Leonard, S. A. (2018). Plastics and the circular
economy (Issue June).
https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/publications/PLASTI
CS for posting.pdf
Bean, M. J. (1987). Legal strategies for reducing persistent
plastics in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin,
18(6 SUPPL. B), 357–360.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X
(87)80026-7
Bellasi, A., Binda, G., Pozzi, A., Galafassi, S., Volta, P., &
Bettinetti, R. (2020). Microplastic contamination in freshwater
environments: A review, focusing on interactions with
sediments and benthic organisms. Environments - MDPI, 7(4).
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments7040030
Ben-David, E. A., Habibi, M., Haddad, E., Hasanin, M., Angel, D.
L., Booth, A. M., & Sabbah, I. (2021). Microplastic distributions
in a domestic wastewater treatment plant: Removal efficiency,
seasonal variation and influence of sampling technique.
Science of the Total Environment, 752, 141880.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141880
Borongan, G., Kashyap, P., & Renaud, P. (2018). Managing
Packaging Waste in the ASEAN Region,.
https://www.giz.de/de/downloads/giz2018_ASEAN-Packaging-
Waste_web.pdf
Boucher, J., & Friot, D. (2017). Primary microplastics in the
oceans: A global evaluation of sources. In Primary
microplastics in the oceans: A global evaluation of sources.
https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2017.01.en
- 14 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
Rochman, C. M., Tahir, A., Williams, S. L., Baxa, D. V., Lam, R.,
Miller, J. T., Teh, F. C., Werorilangi, S., & Teh, S. J. (2015).
Anthropogenic debris in seafood: Plastic debris and fibers
from textiles in fish and bivalves sold for human
consumption. Scientific Reports, 5(September), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14340
Ryan, P. G. (2015). A Brief History of Marine Litter Research. In
M. Bergmann, L. Gutow, & M. Klages (Eds.), Marine
Anthropogenic Litter (pp. 1–25). Springer International
Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_1
Sarijan, S., Azman, S., Said, M. I. M., & Jamal, M. H. (2021).
Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: a recent review of
occurrence, analysis, potential impacts, and research needs.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(2),
1341–1356.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11171-7
Sarkar, D. J., Sarkar, S. D., Mukherjee, S., & Das, B. K. (2021).
Impact and fate of microplastics in the riverine ecosystem. In
M. Kumar, D. Snow, R. Honda, & S. Mukherjee (Eds.),
Contaminants in Drinking and Wastewater Sources (pp.
195–115). Springer.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4599-3_4
Schmidt, C., Krauth, T., & Wagner, S. (2017). Export of Plastic
Debris by Rivers into the Sea. Environmental Science and
Technology, 51(21), 12246–12253.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02368
Smith, M., Love, D. C., Rochman, C. M., & Neff, R. A. (2018).
Microplastics in Seafood and the Implications for Human
Health. Current Environmental Health Reports, 5, 375–386.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-018-0206-z
Stanes, E., & Gibson, C. (2017). Materials that linger: An
embodied geography of polyester clothes. Geoforum, 85
(January), 27–36.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.006
Su, L., Cai, H., Kolandhasamy, P., Wu, C., Rochman, C. M., &
Shi, H. (2018). Using the Asian clam as an indicator of
microplastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems.
Environmental Pollution, 234, 347–355.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.075
Sundt, P., Schulze, P.-E., & Syversen, F. (2014). Sources of
microplastic pollution to the marine environment.
https://www.miljodirektoratet.no/globalassets/publikasjoner/M
321/M321.pdf
Tanaka, K., & Takada, H. (2016). Microplastic fragments and
microbeads in digestive tracts of planktivorous fish from
urban coastal waters. Scientific Reports, 6(September), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34351
The World Bank. (2021). Concept Environmental and Social
Review Summary Concept Stage. In Southeast Asia Regional
Program on Combating Marine Plastics (SEA-MaP) (P175659).
http://www.worldbank.org/projects
Uurasjärvi, E., Hartikainen, S., Setälä, O., Lehtiniemi, M., &
Koistinen, A. (2020). Microplastic concentrations, size
distribution, and polymer types in the surface waters of a
northern European lake. Water Environment Research, 92(1),
149–156.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1229
Waller, C. L., Griffiths, H. J., Waluda, C. M., Thorpe, S. E., Loaiza,
I., Moreno, B., Pacherres, C. O., & Hughes, K. A. (2017).
Microplastics in the Antarctic marine system: An emerging
area of research. Science of the Total Environment, 598,
220–227.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.283
WWF. (2021). The lifecycle of plastics. Newsroom.
https://www.wwf.org.au/news/blogs/the-lifecycle-of-plastics#g
s.fvv9nl
Xu, X., Jian, Y., Xue, Y., Hou, Q., & Wang, L. P. (2019).
Microplastics in the wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs):
Occurrence and removal. Chemosphere, 235, 1089–1096.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.197
Zeri, C., Adamopoulou, A., Koi, A., Koutsikos, N., Lytras, E., &
Dimitriou, E. (2021). Rivers and wastewater-treatment plants
as microplastic pathways to eastern mediterranean waters:
First records for the aegean sea, Greece. Sustainability
(Switzerland), 13(10).
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105328
Leslie, H. A., Brandsma, S. H., van Velzen, M. J. M., & Vethaak,
A. D. (2017). Microplastics en route: Field measurements in
the Dutch river delta and Amsterdam canals, wastewater
treatment plants, North Sea sediments and biota.
Environment International, 101, 133–142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.01.018
Lim, X. Z. (2021). Microplastics are everywhere - but are they
harmful? Nature, 593(7857), 22–25.
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01143-3
Liu, Y., Zhang, J. Di, Cai, C. Y., He, Y., Chen, L. Y., Xiong, X.,
Huang, H. J., Tao, S., & Liu, W. X. (2020). Occurrence and
characteristics of microplastics in the Haihe River: An
investigation of a seagoing river flowing through a megacity
in northern China. Environmental Pollution, 262, 114261.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114261
Lusher, A., Hollman, P., & Mandoza-Hill, J. (2017).
Microplastics in fisheries and aquaculture. In FAO Fisheries
and Aquaculture Technical Paper (Vol. 615, Issue July).
http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7677e.pdf
Lusher, A. L., Tirelli, V., O’ Connor, I., & Officer, R. (2015).
Microplastics in Arctic polar waters: The first reported values
of particles in surface and sub-surface samples. Scientific
Reports, 5(September), 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14947
Miller, R. Z., Watts, A. J. R., Winslow, B. O., Galloway, T. S., &
Barrows, A. P. W. (2017). Mountains to the sea: River study of
plastic and non-plastic microfiber pollution in the northeast
USA. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 124(1), 245–251.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.028
Ngo, P. L., Pramanik, B. K., Shah, K., & Roychand, R. (2019).
Pathway, classification and removal efficiency of microplastics
in wastewater treatment plants. Environmental Pollution, 255.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113326
Nikiema, J., Mateo-Sagasta, J., Asiedu, Z., Saad, D., &
Lamizana, B. (2020). Water Pollution by Plastics and
Microplastics: A review of technical solutions from source to
sea.
https://www.unep.org/resources/report/water-pollution-plastic
s-and-microplastics-review-technical-solutions-source-sea
Osorio, E. D., Tanchuling, M. A. N., & Diola, M. B. L. D. (2021).
Microplastics Occurrence in Surface Waters and Sediments in
Five River Mouths of Manila Bay. Frontiers in Environmental
Science, 9(September), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.719274
Phuong, N. N., Fauvelle, V., Grenz, C., Ourgaud, M., Schmidt,
N., Strady, E., & Sempéré, R. (2021). Highlights from a review
of microplastics in marine sediments. Science of the Total
Environment, 777.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146225
Pirika. (2021). Research Solutions for Reducing Microplastic
Pollution.
https://en.plastic.research.pirika.org/
Prata, C. J., da Costa, J. P., Lopes, I., Duarte, A. C., &
Rocha-Santos, T. (2020). Environmental exposure to
microplastics : An overview on possible human health effects.
Science of the Total Environment, 702, 134455.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134455
Radityaningrum, A. D., Trihadiningrum, Y., Mar’ atusholihah,
Soedjono, E. S., & Herumurti, W. (2021). Microplastic
contamination in water supply and the removal efficiencies of
the treatment plants: A case of Surabaya City, Indonesia.
Journal of Water Process Engineering, 43(July), 102195.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102195
Ragusa, A., Svelato, A., Santacroce, C., Catalano, P.,
Notarstefano, V., Carnevali, O., Papa, F., Rongioletti, M. C. A.,
Baiocco, F., Draghi, S., D’ Amore, E., Rinaldo, D., Matta, M., &
Giorgini, E. (2021). Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics
in human placenta. Environment International, 146, 106274.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274
Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E., Falahudin, D., Peeters, E. T. H.
M., & Koelmans, A. A. (2018). Microplastic Effect Thresholds
for Freshwater Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Environmental
Science and Technology, 52(4), 2278–2286.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05367
Rhodes, C. J. (2018). Plastic pollution and potential solutions.
Science Progress, 101(3), 207–260.
https://doi.org/10.3184/003685018X15294876706211
British Plastic Federation. (2021). A History of Plastics.
https://www.bpf.co.uk/plastipedia/plastics_history/Default.aspx
Bujaczek, T., Kolter, S., Locky, D., & Ross, M. S. (2021).
Characterization of microplastics and anthropogenic fibers in
surface waters of the North Saskatchewan River, Alberta,
Canada. Facets, 6(1), 26–43.
https://doi.org/10.1139/FACETS-2020-0057
Constant, M., Ludwig, W., Kerhervé, P., Sola, J., Charrière, B.,
Sanchez-Vidal, A., Canals, M., & Heussner, S. (2020).
Microplastic fluxes in a large and a small Mediterranean river
catchments: The Têt and the Rhône, Northwestern
Mediterranean Sea. Science of the Total Environment, 716,
136984.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136984
Dris, R., Gasperi, J., Saad, M., Mirande, C., & Tassin, B. (2016).
Synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout: A source of
microplastics in the environment? Marine Pollution Bulletin,
104(1–2), 290–293.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.01.006
Frias, J. P. G. L., & Nash, R. (2019). Microplastics: Finding a
consensus on the definition. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 138
(November 2018), 145–147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.022
Fu, L., Li, J., Wang, G., Luan, Y., & Dai, W. (2021). Adsorption
behavior of organic pollutants on microplastics.
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 217(February),
112207.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112207
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use,
and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 3(7), 3–8.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782
Hann, S., Kershaw, P., Sherrington, C., Bapasola, A., Jamieson,
O., Cole, G., & Hickman, M. (2018). Investigating options for
reducing releases in the aquatic environment of microplastics
emitted by (but not intentionally added in) products. Report
for DG Env EC, Vol. 62, N(February), 335.
Horton, A. A., Jürgens, M. D., Lahive, E., van Bodegom, P. M.,
& Vijver, M. G. (2018). The influence of exposure and
physiology on microplastic ingestion by the freshwater fish
Rutilus rutilus (roach) in the River Thames, UK. Environmental
Pollution, 236, 188–194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.044
Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman,
M., Andrady, A., ... & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs
from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771.
Jemec, A., Horvat, P., Kunej, U., Bele, M., & Kržan, A. (2016).
Uptake and effects of microplastic textile fibers on freshwater
crustacean Daphnia magna. Environmental Pollution, 219,
201–209.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.037
Kadarudin, Yunus, A., Anas, A. M. A., Kurniawati, A., Juniar, M.
W., Wahyuni, A. S., & Annisa, A. N. (2020). Bangkok
declaration and awareness of ASEAN member countries: The
regional law of cleaning our oceans. Journal of Critical
Reviews, 7(19), 900–904.
https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.19.110
Kalčíková, G. (2020). Aquatic vascular plants – A forgotten
piece of nature in microplastic research. Environmental
Pollution, 262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114354
Kentin, E., & Kaarto, H. (2018). An EU ban on microplastics in
cosmetic products and the right to regulate. Review of
European, Comparative and International Environmental Law,
27(3), 254–266.
https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12269
Kristanto, N. A. A. (2018). Study of Potential Microplastics on
Surabaya River Fishes.
http://ecoton.or.id/2019/04/23/penelitian-mikroplastik/
Kumar, R., Sharma, P., Manna, C., & Jain, M. (2021).
Abundance, interaction, ingestion, ecological concerns, and
mitigation policies of microplastic pollution in riverine
ecosystem: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 782,
146695.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146695
Lahens, L., Strady, E., Kieu-le, T., Dris, R., Boukerma, K., Rinnert,
E., Gasperi, J., & Tassin, B. (2018). Macroplastic and
microplastic contamination assessment of a tropical river (
Saigon River , Vietnam ) transversed by a developing
megacity *. Environmental Pollution, 236, 661–671.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.005
Lebreton, L. C. M., Van Der Zwet, J., Damsteeg, J. W., Slat, B.,
Andrady, A., & Reisser, J. (2017). River plastic emissions to the
world’ s oceans. Nature Communications, 8, 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15611
Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2018). Treatment characteristics of
microplastics at biological sewage treatment facilities in
Korea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 137(October), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.050
Abeynayaka, A., & Itsubo, N. (2019). A framework to
incorporate aquatic plastic into life cycle assessment of plastic
products. EcoDesing 2019 International Symposium, 261–265.
Abeynayaka, A., Werellagama, I., Ngoc-Bao, P., Hengesbaugh,
M., Gajanayake, P., Nallaperuma, B., Karkour, S., Xuan-Thanh,
B., & Itsubo, N. (2021).
Microplastics in Wastewater Treatment Plants. In Advances in
Biological Wastewater Treatment Systems. In Advances in
Biological Wastewater Treatment Systems (In press). Elsevier.
Abeynayaka, Amila. (2021). Plastic Spills in Maritime
Transportation and Consequences. The Green Guardian.
https://srilankagbc.org/ecosystem-restoration/
Abeynayaka, Amila, Kojima, F., Miwa, Y., Ito, N., Nihei, Y.,
Fukunaga, Y., Yashima, Y., & Itsubo, N. (2020). Rapid sampling
of suspended and floating microplastics in challenging
riverine and coastal water environments in Japan. Water
(Switzerland), 12(7), 1–21.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071903
Ahechti, M., Benomar, M., Alami, M. El, & Mendiguchía, C.
(2020). Metal adsorption by microplastics in aquatic
environments under controlled conditions: exposure time, pH
and salinity. International Journal of Environmental Analytical
Chemistry.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.1733546
Alegado, J. E., Aliño, J. M., Chow, S. C. F., Diola, M. B. L.,
Gamaralalage, P. J. D., Gurrero, L., Hengesbaugh, M.,
Hernandez, V., Ishimura, Y., Kato, M., Kim, E., Liu, C.,
Moinuddin, M., Moon, D., Okuno, M., Olsen, S. H., Pelogio, G.,
Pey, P., Ngoc Bao, P., … Peer. (2021). PLASTIC ATLAS - Facts
and figures about the world of synthetic polymers (Asia
Edition) (K. Li & C. Kunze (eds.)). Heinrich Boll Stiftung.
Arkin, C., Azoulay, D., Caterbow, A., Chemnitz, C., Duran, C.,
Eriksen, M., Feit, S., Fernandez, M., Flood, C., Fuhr, L.,
Grimberg, E., Gürtler, S., Guerrero, L., Hausmann, J.,
Hernandez, V., Kallee, U., Keith, C., Knoblauch, D., Lauwigi, C.,
… Ziebarth, N. (2019). Plastic Atlas. In L. Fuhr, M. Franklin, & K.
Schächtele (Eds.), Heinrich Böll Foundation and Break Free
From Plastic (2nd ed., Vol. 69, Issue 4). Heinrich Böll
Foundation.
Barnes, D. K. A., Galgani, F., Thompson, R. C., & Barlaz, M.
(2009). Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in
global environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 1985–1998.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0205
Barra, R., & Leonard, S. A. (2018). Plastics and the circular
economy (Issue June).
https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/publications/PLASTI
CS for posting.pdf
Bean, M. J. (1987). Legal strategies for reducing persistent
plastics in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin,
18(6 SUPPL. B), 357–360.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X
(87)80026-7
Bellasi, A., Binda, G., Pozzi, A., Galafassi, S., Volta, P., &
Bettinetti, R. (2020). Microplastic contamination in freshwater
environments: A review, focusing on interactions with
sediments and benthic organisms. Environments - MDPI, 7(4).
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments7040030
Ben-David, E. A., Habibi, M., Haddad, E., Hasanin, M., Angel, D.
L., Booth, A. M., & Sabbah, I. (2021). Microplastic distributions
in a domestic wastewater treatment plant: Removal efficiency,
seasonal variation and influence of sampling technique.
Science of the Total Environment, 752, 141880.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141880
Borongan, G., Kashyap, P., & Renaud, P. (2018). Managing
Packaging Waste in the ASEAN Region,.
https://www.giz.de/de/downloads/giz2018_ASEAN-Packaging-
Waste_web.pdf
Boucher, J., & Friot, D. (2017). Primary microplastics in the
oceans: A global evaluation of sources. In Primary
microplastics in the oceans: A global evaluation of sources.
https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2017.01.en
- 15 -
RIVERINE MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES - CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE -
ISAP2021 / Thematic Track 11 / https://isap.iges.or.jp/2021/en/t11.html
This paper has been prepared for discussion at the International Forum for Sustainable Asia and the Pacific (ISAP2021).
2108-11 Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama, Kanagawa, 240-0115, Japan
Tel: 046-855-3700 Fax: 046-855-3709
E-mail: iges@iges.or.jp URL: https://www.iges.or.jp/
Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES)
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent IGES.
Copyright © 2021 Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. All rights reserved.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter reviews recent developments in microplastic-related research; identifies major sources of microplastics to wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs); investigates the detection methods, concentration levels, and removal efficiency of microplastics at selected WWTPs; and presents a discussion on microplastics removal from wastewater and sludge using biological wastewater treatment processes. The findings are subsequently summarized to suggest potential improvements and future directions for research and development addressing the issue of microplastic pollution. The research identified that supportive policy measures coupled with effective WWTP designs are important for minimizing microplastic-related pollution. In addition, knowledge of the origins of microplastics is useful for WWT system designers, practitioners, policymakers, product designers, and other stakeholders. While sampling and analytical methods continue to evolve, several recommended best practices include focusing on the minimization of contamination, reproducibility, and the applicability of methods in WWTP facilities. Because microplastics can include complex composite polymers with additives, adsorbents, and biofilm, further research on toxicity, chemical leachability, and pathogenic biofilm properties is needed to understand the potential impact on biological wastewater treatment systems.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Aquatic environments are contaminated with plastic wastes generated from anthropogenic activities. Plastic wastes associated with product life cycles impact biodiversity, primary production, human health, social assets, etc. Lack of a solid framework and having plenty of knowledge gaps limit the incorporation of aquatic plastic into life cycle assessments (LCA). This study focuses on developing a framework for integrating aquatic plastics into plastic product LCA. The observations of the study indicate that the complexity of aquatic plastic at the inventory stage, environmental compartment state due to transportation and degradation, and the fate and effect analysis stage due to lack of data.
Article
Full-text available
The ubiquity of microplastics (MPs) has now been demonstrated throughout Earth's geographic areas in both terrestrial and marine environments. Marine ecosystems are the end point of the plastic waste cycle, and marine sediments are increasingly considered to be a sink for plastic debris, with possible deleterious effects on seafloor ecosystems. However, the low concentration of MPs in a complex matrix such as marine sediment makes their reliable analysis difficult. MP concentration in marine sediments is usually determined by various extraction procedures followed by optical, spectroscopy or mass spectrometry techniques, and are therefore hard to compare. Therefore, reliable determination of MPs in sediment is a challenging task. Here we present a short review on studies dealing with analytical determination protocols and MP detection in marine sediments and discuss the advantages of the different techniques used. This analysis of the literature reveals that most of the 70 studies were carried out in European and Asian coastal environments. The use of NaCl saturated solution, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) are by far the most-used techniques for the different steps of separation, digestion and identification, respectively. Based on this body of literature, we present recommendations and suggestions for future research in order to increase the reliability of results and to facilitate inter-comparison. The use of NaCl saturated and H2O2 solution is strongly recommended for the separation and digestion steps, respectively, whereas during the filtration step it is necessary to choose filter type based on the identification technique. More thorough investigation is needed to establish a systematic protocol for MP identification. A combination of techniques would permit to identify all items, and personal bias could be avoided if automatic identification was implemented. Nanoplastics (NP) occurrence in marine sediments is also discussed, although no data are available to date.
Article
Full-text available
https://srilankagbc.org/ecosystem-restoration/ International shipping transportation accounts for hundreds of million containers, each year. Studies have estimated that the average plastic losses from ships could reach up to 10,000 metric tons per year based on the reported incidents such as X-press pearl vessel. The number could be higher than this since most container loss is not reported systematically because, currently, there is no obligation for lost cargo to be declared unless of a hazardous nature. Once a plastic spill has occurred unless removed with the longevity of plastic plastics this may remain in the environment for 100s of years. Impacts on marine species could be due to various reasons. Plastics may contain toxic additives and may adsorb toxic compounds from the environment. Hence this may cause ecotoxic effects. Apart from that comparatively larger plastics may cause damages due to entanglement or suffocation. Economic losses may occur due to avoided fishery activities and in tourism due to degraded site quality. Once a spill has occured, quick responses to avoid the dispersal of floating plastics to be taken. Protecting the pre-identified vulnerable sites (high biodiversity locations, salt works, etc.) is another key measure to minimize the damage.
Article
Full-text available
The present work provides the first records on microplastic (MP) amounts and types in rivers and wastewater effluents entering the Aegean Sea, eastern Mediterranean. Two rivers were sampled using a manta net (mesh size, 0.33 mm): a small urban and a medium-sized river with a rural, semiurban catchment. MPs in wastewater samples were collected at two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) within the Athens metropolitan area after secondary treatment and from a pilot biological membrane unit (MBR), using a series of sieves. MPs in the samples were identified using stereoscopic image analysis and spectroscopic techniques. MP concentrations in the rivers were found to be variable, with as high as 27.73 items m−3 in the urban river. Differences in MP shape types, sizes, and polymer types reflect catchment size and usage. MP concentration in wastewater effluents was found to be 100 times higher in the secondary treatment (213 items m−3) than that in the pilot MBR (2.29 items m−3), with filaments and polymers indicative of synthetic textiles and household use. Further research is needed in order to accurately determine variability in MP concentrations and fluxes from these two pathways in the eastern Mediterranean Sea and elucidate the role of rivers in MP retention.
Technical Report
Full-text available
Packaging is an indispensable part of retail, logistics and the consumer goods industry. It contains, protects, preserves and transports products from producers to consumers. Common packaging materials include plastic, paper and board, metals, glass and wood. During the last decades, the packaging industry has evolved significantly in terms of innovation, material use and complexity of design. This trend continues in the rapidly growing economies of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) where the amount of packaging has been increasing together with the rising demand for products and services. At the same time, there is growing global concern with regard to the post-consumer management of packaging. Packaging waste constitutes a significant fraction of municipal solid waste (MSW) in the ASEAN region. Plastic seems to have become an essential part of everyday lives. Increased consumption has contributed to waste management challenges in cities and rural areas, and both human settlements and ecosystems are increasingly overwhelmed with plastic pollution. Un-managed plastic waste pollutes the air and land through open burning and open dumping. It blocks drainage systems, increasing the risk of flooding and providing breeding grounds for mosquitos carrying malaria and other infectious diseases. Where regular waste collection is not available, citizens often dispose of their waste along canals, leading to plastic waste leakage into rivers and the ocean. Joint efforts by policy makers and all stakeholders along the packaging value chain are therefore required.
Article
Microplastics (MPs) have been recently detected in the Surabaya River, Indonesia, which is used as raw water for water supply. This condition has aroused concern about MP presence in the treated water in Surabaya drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs). This study aimed to investigate the MP abundance and characteristics of the raw and treated water and the removal efficiencies in each treatment unit in two selected Sub-DWTPs (SDWTPs) in Surabaya Water Supply Enterprise. These SDWTPs apply conventional technology comprising aeration, pre-sedimentation, coagulation, flocculation-sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection stages. The MP abundance values in the raw and treated water in SDWTPs I and II were 26.8–35 and 8.5–12.3 particles/L, respectively. The MP was dominated by 93–95% fiber in the raw water and 84–100% in the treated water. The MP dominant size in the raw and treated water was 351–1000 μm, with the percentages of 45–50 and 36–69%, respectively. The dominant polymer types of MPs in the raw water were polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and low-density polyethylene (LDPE). The total MP removal efficiencies in SDWTPs I and II were 54 and 76%, respectively.
Article
Scientists are rushing to study the tiny plastic specks that are in marine animals — and in us. Scientists are rushing to study the tiny plastic specks that are in marine animals — and in us. Credit: Will Parson/Chesapeake Bay Program Microplastics from the Magothy River are pictured at the laboratory of Dr. Lance Yonkos at the University of Maryland. Microplastics from the Magothy River are pictured at the laboratory of Dr. Lance Yonkos at the University of Maryland.
Article
Microplastics (MPs) are emerging pollutants that act as a carrier of toxic pollutants, release toxic substances, and aggregate in biota. The adsorption behavior of MPs has recently become a research hot spot. The objective of this study was to summarize the main mechanisms by which MPs adsorb organic pollutants, introduce some mathematical models commonly used to study the adsorption behavior of MPs, and discuss the factors affecting the adsorption capacity from three perspectives, i.e., the properties of MPs and organic pollutants, and environmental factors. Adsorption kinetics and isothermal adsorption models are commonly used to study the adsorption of organic pollutants on MPs. We observed that hydrophobic interaction is the most common mechanism by which MPs adsorb organic pollutants, and also reportedly controls the portion of organic pollutants. Additionally, electrostatic interaction and other non-covalent forces, such as hydrogen bonds, halogen bonds, and π–π interactions, are also mechanisms of organic pollutant adsorption on MPs. The particle size, specific surface area, aging degree, crystallinity, and polarity of MPs, and organic pollutant properties (hydrophobicity and dissociated forms) are key factors affecting adsorption capacity. Changes in the pH, temperature, and ionic strength also affect the adsorption capacity. Current research on the adsorption behavior of MPs has mainly been conducted in laboratories, and in-depth studies on the adsorption mechanism and influencing factors are limited. Therefore, studies on the adsorption behavior of MPs in the environment are required, and this study will contribute to a better understanding of this topic.