ArticlePDF Available

Animal Emotions—Do Animals Feel as We Do?

Authors:

Abstract

Emotions are an essential part of how we experience our world. Humans can express emotions by telling others how we feel—but what about animals? How can we tell whether they experience emotions and, if they do, which ones? When we think about the animals under human care, it is not only scientifically interesting but also ethically important to understand how these animals experience their worlds. Over the last 20 years, researchers have made considerable progress by identifying ways to assess emotions in animals. For example, researchers can look at the facial expressions of animals, record their vocalisations, or measure body processes such as changes in the heartbeat or hormone concentrations in the blood. This information can tell us more about how animals feel, why and how emotions have evolved, and what we, as humans, share with animals in our emotional experience of the world around us.
BIODIVERSITY
Published: 17 November 2021
doi: 10.3389/frym.2021.622811
ANIMAL EMOTIONS—DO ANIMALS FEEL AS WE DO?
Annika Krause *† and Christian Nawroth *†
Institute of Behavioural Physiology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany
YOUNG REVIEWERS:
CLUB
DIVULGACIE-
NCIA
AGES: 12–13
Emotions are an essential part of how we experience our world.
Humans can express emotions by telling others how we feel—but
what about animals? How can we tell whether they experience
emotions and, if they do, which ones? When we think about the
animals under human care, it is not only scientifically interesting
but also ethically important to understand how these animals
experience their worlds. Over the last 20 years, researchers have
made considerable progress by identifying ways to assess emotions in
animals. For example, researchers can look at the facial expressions of
animals, record their vocalisations, or measure body processes such
as changes in the heartbeat or hormone concentrations in the blood.
This information can tell us more about how animals feel, why and
how emotions have evolved, and what we, as humans, share with
animals in our emotional experience of the world around us.
WHAT ARE EMOTIONS AND WHY DO WE EXPERIENCE
THEM?
Emotions play a central role in our lives. But if we are asked, we might
find it hard to describe what an emotion actually is! It is dicult to
kids.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 09 |Article 622811 |1
Krause and Nawroth Do Animals Experience Emotions?
know how many dierent emotions there are, or whether everyone
experiences certain emotions in the same way. What we know for
sure is that emotions arise from the activity of nerve cells in several
parts of the brain. Emotions can be described as pleasant (positive) or
unpleasant (negative) and more arousing or less arousing, which refers
to the intensity of the emotion [1]. When we experience emotions,
they are often linked to changes in our behaviour and our physiology,
PHYSIOLOGY
Summary of all organic
processes and
phenomena of
an organism.
which means the functions of our bodies, such as changes in posture,
blood pressure, sweating, or heartbeat. For example, imagine you see
a bear approaching you in the forest. What would you feel? Probably
fear! The emotion of fear would probably be accompanied by a fearful
facial expression and a rising heart rate, and would probably result in
you running away.
But why do we experience emotions at all? While emotions are
intangible and hard to describe—even for scientists—they serve
important purposes. Emotions help us learn, initiate actions, and
survive by adapting to new and sudden changes in the environment.
Emotions change how we think, to prepare us to quickly select an
appropriate response, such as running away when you see a bear
approaching. Our behaviour can help us to avoid situations that evoke
negative emotions (harm or punishment), or to seek out situations
that generate positive emotions, such as joy. From an evolutionary
perspective, experiencing emotions increases our ability to survive
and reproduce.
DO ANIMALS EXPERIENCE EMOTIONS?
Since animals cannot tell us how they feel, how can we know whether
they experience emotions? Because animal emotions are dicult
to see, the question of whether animals experience emotions has
historically been a philosophical one. Researchers have only started to
investigate the emotional lives of animals in the past few decades. But
when we think about farm animals, or any other animal under human
care, it is not only scientifically interesting but also ethically important
to try to understand how these animals emotionally experience
their worlds. Farm animals are often kept in very large numbers
in rather barren environments. This might lead to sickness, stress,
and decreased well-being. If we could tell how animals emotionally
experience their situations, this could help us to improve animal
welfare. As we have already seen, emotional processes are complex
and include feelings, behaviours, and physiological changes. Feelings
are especially hard to assess in animals because they cannot tell us
how they feel. However, when emotional things happen (such as
when you see a bear approaching you), they cause changes in several
biological processes. Based on these changes, researchers developed
a wide set of methods to monitor emotions in animals, by measuring
changes on the behavioural or physical levels, often at the same time
(Figure 1) [2].
kids.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 09 |Article 622811 |2
Krause and Nawroth Do Animals Experience Emotions?
Figure 1
Figure 1
There are a variety of
behavioural and
physiological
parameters that
scientists can use to
assess emotions in
animals.
MEASURING THE BEHAVIOURAL COMPONENT OF ANIMAL
EMOTIONS
The most easily detectable reaction of an animal to an event is how
it changes its behaviour. Humans often change facial expressions and
gestures depending on whether we experience an event as pleasant or
not. If you look at your friends’ faces, you can often very quickly assess
if they are happy, fearful, angry, or disgusted. Animals show these
characteristic facial expressions as well! So called grimace scales for
GRIMACE SCALE
A methods of pain
assessment for
non-human animals
that is based on
changes in a number of
“facial action units” in
the animal, such as
narrowing of the eyes.
horses, pigs, sheep, rats, mice, and cats have already been developed.
For example, changes in ear position, the amount of visible eye white,
and tension in the chewing muscles can indicate dierent levels of
pain or fear in animals (Figure 1). It is important to remember that
the facial expressions of animals usually look dierent than those
of humans—joy might not be indicated by a smile (showing your
teeth is often a signal of stress in other primates), while sadness
is not accompanied by tears (pigs do not cry). In addition, prey
animals (including all farm animals) tend not to show emotions that
indicate pain or distress, as this might make them more vulnerable
to predators.
Another example of animal behaviour that is linked to emotions
involves vocalisations, such as grunts, bleats, and moos, which can
indicate stress in many species. We know this is true for humans,
too: imagine you are singing a song in front of many people; your
voice might get shaky if you are nervous or experiencing stage fright.
Researchers have found that the vocalisations of pigs, goats, and cows
also change and get less harmonious when these animals are under
stress, for example when they are isolated from the group, indicating
negative emotions [3].
kids.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 09 |Article 622811 |3
Krause and Nawroth Do Animals Experience Emotions?
Our decision-making is also influenced by the emotions we
experience. For example, we know that humans who are in a bad
mood tend to judge situations more negatively compared to humans
who are in a positive mood. We all know the saying about the glass
being either half full or half empty, depending on how you look at
it. Interestingly, this also appears to be the case for animals (Figure
1). Farm animals, such as pigs and horses, make more cautious
and pessimistic decisions after a negative event and more optimistic
decisions after a positive event [4], and sheep pay closer attention
to negative events when they are in a bad mood. However, we
must always keep in mind that behaviour in animal species can dier
depending on the situation, and we need to be cautious when we
interpret animal behaviour to assess emotions.
MEASURING THE PHYSIOLOGICAL COMPONENT OF
ANIMAL EMOTIONS
Physiological changes are central to emotions, as they play an
important role in preparing animals for potentially dangerous
situations. These changes include the activity of the nervous system
and the levels of certain hormones.
The autonomic nervous system regulates bodily functions including
AUTONOMIC
NERVOUS SYSTEM
(ANS)
Part of the nervous
system that acts largely
unconsciously and
regulates bodily
functions including
heart rate, blood
pressure, respiration,
and digestion.
heart rate, blood pressure, respiration, and digestion. Changes in
autonomic nervous system activity can be used to study emotions
in animal species. This is so because the two major subsystems
of the autonomic nervous system—the sympathetic (activating) and
SYMPATHETIC
NERVOUS SYSTEM
Part of the ANS that is
responsible for
preparing the body for
action, particularly in
situations threatening
survival. It increases
heart rate, constricts
blood vessels, and
raises blood pressure.
PARASYMPATHETIC
NERVOUS SYSTEM
Part of the ANS that is
responsible for
stimulation of activities
that occur when the
body is at rest,
especially after eating.
It decreases heart rate,
and increases intestinal
and gland activity.
parasympathetic (deactivating) systems—are directly connected to
the heart. Based on emotions and stress, the complex interaction
of these two subsystems causes variations in both heart rate and
HEART RATE
The number of heart
beats per minute.
the time between heartbeats, which is called heart rate variability
HEART RATE
VARIABILITY
It is a measure of the
variance in time
between the beats of
the heart and can be
aected by the
emotions and the stress
that we
currently experience.
[5]. But what exactly can these changes in heart rate and heart rate
variability tell us about emotions? Parasympathetic activity tells us
whether an animal experiences a situation as positive or negative,
whereas sympathetic activity tells us whether an animal experiences
low or high arousal, which means the level of attention and alertness
toward the environment. In our bear example, your experience of
the emotion of fear will be accompanied by an increased heartbeat
(high sympathetic activity) and less variability in your heart beats (low
parasympathetic activity). Researchers have found that animal and
human nervous systems react in similar ways in fearful situations. This
indicates that many emotions in animals physiologically mirror those
in humans.
Another physiological reaction to emotions in both humans and
animals involves changes in hormone concentrations. In stressful
HORMONES
Chemical messengers
that carry information
throughout the body.
They are produced by
glands and travel in the
bloodstream to tissues
and organs.
situations, an increase in a hormone called adrenaline immediately
reduces the blood supply to all organs that are not absolutely needed
in an emergency. At the same time, the blood flow to important
kids.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 09 |Article 622811 |4
Krause and Nawroth Do Animals Experience Emotions?
organs such as the brain, heart, and lungs is increased. The hormone
noradrenaline provides increased alertness, and cortisol provides
the energy to deal with stressful situations. Other hormones, such
as dopamine, serotonin, and oxytocin, play important roles in joy,
enthusiasm, and social bonding.
WHY SHOULD WE CARE IF ANIMALS EXPERIENCE
EMOTIONS?
From all this research, it seems that the similarities between human and
animal emotions might be closer than we would have expected a few
decades ago. Animals react to their environments much as humans
do. They respond emotionally to others and they evaluate situations
in a similar way, becoming stressed and anxious in times of danger.
While we may never know exactly how animals feel, studies have
found that there are definite behavioural and physiological similarities
in emotional expressions between humans and animals. We can thus
infer, with quite some confidence, that animals can feel emotions.
The more we discover about the behavioural and physiological
components of emotions in animals, the more we understand about
emotions, including our own ones, and how they aect the way we
behave in our world.
The evidence of emotions in animals might also encourage us to
re-think the environments in which we keep the animals that are
under our care—on farms, in zoos, or in our houses. If we can better
understand how animals interact and react to their environments,
we can ultimately improve these environments, and thus improve
human-animal relationships. It must be our ethical goal to decrease
the negative emotions these animals experience, as well as to increase
their experience of positive emotions.
REFERENCES
1. Mendl, M., Burman, O. H. P., and Paul, E. S. 2010. An integrative and functional
framework for the study of animal emotion and mood. Proc R Soc B.
277:2895–904. doi: 10.1098/Rspb.2010.0303
2. Paul, E. S., Harding, E. J., and Mendl, M. 2005. Measuring emotional processes in
animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. Neurosci Biobehav Rev.
29:469–91. doi: 10.1016/j.Neubiorev.2005.01.002
3. Briefer, E. F. 2012. Vocal expression of emotions in mammals: mechanisms of
production and evidence. J Zool. 288:1–20. doi: 10.1111/J.1469-7998.2012.
00920.X
4. Roelofs, S., Boleij, H., Nordquist, R. E., and van der Staay, F. J. 2016. Making
decisions under ambiguity: judgment bias tasks for assessing emotional state in
animals. Front Behav Neurosci. 10:119. doi: 10.3389/Fnbeh.2016.00119
5. von Borell, E., Langbein, J., Després, G., Hansen, S., Leterrier, C., Marchant-Forde,
J., et al. 2007. Heart rate variability as a measure of autonomic regulation of
kids.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 09 |Article 622811 |5
Krause and Nawroth Do Animals Experience Emotions?
cardiac activity for assessing stress and welfare in farm animals–a review. Physiol
Behav. 92:293–316. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.01.007
SUBMITTED: 29 October 2020; ACCEPTED: 18 October 2021;
PUBLISHED ONLINE: 17 November 2021.
EDITED BY: Stuart Semple, University of Roehampton London, United Kingdom
CITATION: Krause A and Nawroth C (2021) Animal Emotions—Do Animals Feel as
We Do? Front. Young Minds 9:622811. doi: 10.3389/frym.2021.622811
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare that the research was conducted in
the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed
as a potential conflict of interest.
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Krause and Nawroth. This is an open-access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use,
distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original
author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication
in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use,
distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
YOUNG REVIEWERS
CLUB DIVULGACIENCIA, AGES: 12–13
Members of Divulgaciencia are students from secondary school highly motivated in
science and technology. This working team focus on communication and scientific
dissemination. We enjoy looking for scientific channels, videos, publications,
and conferences for general public to increase our knowledge and learn about
communication skills. In this review students from IES Santa Eugenia (Madrid) and
IES Profesor Domínguez Ortiz (Azuqueca de Henares) have been involved.
AUTHORS
ANNIKA KRAUSE
Annika is a behavioural biologist at the Leibniz-Institute for Farm Animal Biology,
and she investigates emotions in farm animals, especially pigs. With her studies, she
tries to understand how emotions are mediated by physiological and behavioural
processes and how personality may shape emotional experiences in animals. Her
research aims at a better understanding of the complexity of emotional states
in animals, which plays a significant role in improving farm animal conditions
and welfare. *krause@fbn-dummerstorf.de
CHRISTIAN NAWROTH
Christian is a trained biologist and a researcher at the Leibniz-Institute for Farm
Animal Biology, where he is currently working on a project that asks how
domestication and the selection for high milk yield has changed behaviour
kids.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 09 |Article 622811 |6
Krause and Nawroth Do Animals Experience Emotions?
and problem-solving abilities in goats. He is interested in how animals interact
with their physical and social environments, and his research focuses on the
mental capacities of farm (goats, horses, pigs, sheep) and zoo (great apes,
penguins) animals and how this knowledge can be used to improve the
animals’ conditions and human-animal interactions. *nawroth.christian@gmail.com;
orcid.org/0000-0003-4582-4057
These authors have contributed equally to this work
kids.frontiersin.org November 2021 | Volume 09 |Article 622811 |7
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Judgment bias tests are considered as a family of promising tools in the assessment of emotional states of animals. Judgment bias tasks (JBTs) provide a cognitive measure of optimism and/or pessimism by recording behavioral responses to ambiguous stimuli. For instance, a negative emotional state is expected to produce a negative or pessimistic judgment of an ambiguous stimulus, whereas a positive emotional state produces a positive or optimistic judgment of the same ambiguous stimulus. Measuring an animal’s emotional state or mood is relevant in both animal welfare research and biomedical research. This is reflected in the increasing use of JBTs in both research areas. We discuss the different implementations of JBTs with animals, with a focus on their potential as an accurate measure of emotional state. JBTs have been successfully applied to a very broad range of species, using many different types of testing equipment and experimental protocols. However, further validation of this test is deemed necessary. For example, the often extensive training period required for successful judgment bias testing remains a possible factor confounding results. Also, the issue of ambiguous stimuli losing their ambiguity with repeated testing requires additional attention. Possible improvements are suggested to further develop the JBTs in both animal welfare and biomedical research.
Article
Full-text available
Measurement of heart rate variability (HRV) is a non-invasive technique that can be used to investigate the functioning of the autonomic nervous system, especially the balance between sympathetic and vagal activity. It has been proven to be very useful in humans for both research and clinical studies concerned with cardiovascular diseases, diabetic autonomic dysfunction, hypertension and psychiatric and psychological disorders. Over the past decade, HRV has been used increasingly in animal research to analyse changes in sympathovagal balance related to diseases, psychological and environmental stressors or individual characteristics such as temperament and coping strategies. This paper discusses current and past HRV research in farm animals. First, it describes how cardiac activity is regulated and the relationships between HRV, sympathovagal balance and stress and animal welfare. Then it proceeds to outline the types of equipment and methodological approaches that have been adapted and developed to measure inter-beats intervals (IBI) and estimate HRV in farm animals. Finally, it discusses experiments and conclusions derived from the measurement of HRV in pigs, cattle, horses, sheep, goats and poultry. Emphasis has been placed on deriving recommendations for future research investigating HRV, including approaches for measuring and analysing IBI data. Data from earlier research demonstrate that HRV is a promising approach for evaluating stress and emotional states in animals. It has the potential to contribute much to our understanding and assessment of the underlying neurophysiological processes of stress responses and different welfare states in farm animals.
Article
Emotions play a crucial role in an animal's life because they facilitate responses to external or internal events of significance for the organism. In social species, one of the main functions of emotional expression is to regulate social interactions. There has recently been a surge of interest in animal emotions in several disciplines, ranging from neuroscience to evolutionary zoology. Because measurements of subjective emotional experiences are not possible in animals, researchers use neurophysiological, behavioural and cognitive indicators. However, good indicators, particularly of positive emotions, are still lacking. Vocalizations are linked to the inner state of the caller. The emotional state of the caller causes changes in the muscular tension and action of its vocal apparatus, which in turn, impacts on vocal parameters of vocalizations. By considering the mode of production of vocalizations, we can understand and predict how vocal parameters should change according to the arousal (intensity) or valence (positive/negative) of emotional states. In this paper, I review the existing literature on vocal correlates of emotions in mammals. Non‐human mammals could serve as ideal models to study vocal expression of emotions, because, contrary to human speech, animal vocalizations are assumed to be largely free of control and therefore direct expressions of underlying emotions. Furthermore, a comparative approach between humans and other animals would give us a better understanding of how emotion expression evolved. Additionally, these non‐invasive indicators could serve various disciplines that require animal emotions to be clearly identified, including psychopharmacology and animal welfare science.
Article
Contemporary researchers regard emotional states as multifaceted, comprising physiological, behavioural, cognitive and subjective components. Subjective, conscious experience of emotion can be inferred from linguistic report in humans, but is inaccessible to direct measurement in non-human animals. However, measurement of other components of emotion is possible, and a variety of methods exist for monitoring emotional processes in animals by measuring behavioural and physiological changes. These are important tools, but they have limitations including difficulties of interpretation and the likelihood that many may be sensitive indicators of emotional arousal but not valence-pleasantness/unpleasantness. Cognitive components of emotion are a largely unexplored source of information about animal emotions, despite the fact that cognition-emotion links have been extensively researched in human cognitive science indicating that cognitive processes-appraisals of stimuli, events and situations-play an important role in the generation of emotional states, and that emotional states influence cognitive functioning by inducing attentional, memory and judgement biases. Building on this research, it is possible to design non-linguistic cognitive measures of animal emotion that may be especially informative in offering new methods for assessing emotional valence (positive as well as negative), discriminating same-valenced emotion of different types, identifying phenotypes with a cognitive predisposition to develop affective disorders, and perhaps shedding light on the issue of conscious emotional experiences in animals.