ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Abstract and Figures

Introduction BDSM is an abbreviation used to reference the concepts of bondage and discipline, dominance and submission, sadism and masochism, enacted by power exchanges between consensual partners. In recent years, attention has shifted from the idea of BDSM as a pathological and tabooed niche practice towards viewing BDSM as a healthy form of intimacy. Aim This systematic review brings together all existing literature on the biology of BDSM and places it in a broader biological context. Method A systematic search was conducted on Pubmed, Web of Science and PsycARTICLES, of which ten articles are included and discussed in this systematic review. Results There is evidence for cortisol changes in submissives as a result of a BDSM interaction, suggesting involvement of the physiological stress system. Endocannabinoid changes implicate the pleasure and reward system. In dominants, this biologically measured pleasure seemed to be dependent on power play rather than pain play. Testosterone and oxytocin are also implicated in BDSM, though their role is less evident. Research into brain region activity patterns related to BDSM interest suggests a role for the parietal operculum and ventral striatum in the context of the pleasure and reward system, the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex in the context of pain perception, empathy-related circuits such as the anterior insula (AI), anterior midcingulate cortex (ACC) and sensorimotor cortex and the left frontal cortex in the context of social and sexual interactions. Pain thresholds are shown to be higher in submissive individuals and a BDSM interaction may cause pain thresholds to rise in submissives as well. Conclusion BDSM interactions are complex and influenced by several psychological, social and biological processes. Though research is limited, there is emerging evidence for an interaction between several biological systems involved in these types of interests and activities. This means there is an important role for future research to replicate and supplement current results.
Content may be subject to copyright.
The biology of BDSM: a systematic review
Elise Wuyts, Manuel Morrens
Abstract:
Introduction
BDSM is an abbreviation used to reference the concepts of bondage and discipline, dominance
and submission, sadism and masochism, enacted by power exchanges between consensual
partners. In recent years, attention has shifted from the idea of BDSM as a pathological and
tabooed niche practice towards viewing BDSM as a healthy form of intimacy.
Aim
This systematic review brings together all existing literature on the biology of BDSM and places
it in a broader biological context.
Method
A systematic search was conducted on Pubmed, Web of Science and PsycARTICLES, of which
ten articles are included and discussed in this systematic review.
Results
There is evidence for cortisol changes in submissives as a result of a BDSM interaction,
suggesting involvement of the physiological stress system. Endocannabinoid changes implicate
the pleasure and reward system. In dominants, this biologically measured pleasure seemed to
be dependent on power play rather than pain play. Testosterone and oxytocin are also implicated
in BDSM, though their role is less evident. Research into brain region activity patterns related
to BDSM interest suggests a role for the parietal operculum and ventral striatum in the context
of the pleasure and reward system, the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex in the
context of pain perception, empathy-related circuits such as the anterior insula (AI), anterior
midcingulate cortex (ACC) and sensorimotor cortex and the left frontal cortex in the context of
social and sexual interactions. Pain thresholds are shown to be higher in submissive individuals
and a BDSM interaction may cause pain thresholds to rise in submissives as well.
Conclusion
BDSM interactions are complex and influenced by several psychological, social and biological
processes. Though research is limited, there is emerging evidence for an interaction between
several biological systems involved in these types of interests and activities. This means there
is an important role for future research to replicate and supplement current results.
Keywords:
BDSM; sexuality; submissive; biological assessment; pain threshold; functional brain imaging
Introduction
BDSM is an acronym used to describe the concepts of bondage & discipline, dominance &
submission and sadism & masochism. It encompasses the psychological and physical roleplay
between two or more consenting partners, often involving a power exchange [1] between a
submissive party, (also referred to as “bottom” or “masochist”) and a dominant party (also
referred to as “top” or “sadist”). These interactions will often revolve around elements of pain
and power imbalance [2]. The BDSM practices referenced in this review all meet the
fundamental principle of safe, sane and consensual, which is a widely accepted cornerstone of
the BDSM community [3]. Coercive sexual sadism (i.e. sadistic practices with a non-consenting
partner) by its very definition is very different to consensual BDSM, even though certain
behaviour might seem similar on the surface [4]. Consequently, studies focusing on coercive
sexual sadism fall outside the scope of this review. For an overview of the current literature on
coercive sexual sadism, we refer to the systematic review of Mokros and colleagues [4].
In recent years, attention has shifted from the idea of BDSM as a pathological and tabooed
niche practice towards viewing BDSM as a healthy form of intimacy [5]. BDSM has shown to
be quite prevalent in society, with a large-scale survey study conducted by our group indicating
that 46.8% of the Flemish population had engaged in a BDSM-related activity at least once [6].
In the same study population, 7.8% identified as BDSM practitioners. Of these, 85.9% solely
practices at home, while 14.1% will also perform in a public setting. The practitioners identified
as follows: 28% as dominant, 36% as submissive, 27% as switch (i.e. persons who switch
between the dominant and submissive role) and 9% as other. Although more people are
becoming aware of what BDSM is and what it entails, much about the underlying psychological
and especially biological processes driving these interests and fantasies have yet to be revealed.
Are certain baseline biological processes related to an interest in BDSM? Do BDSM
interactions trigger biological changes that reinforce these interests? What changes might we
expect during a BDSM-themed interaction or “play” and how do these changes explain what
BDSM practitioners report?
We will begin by exploring several known aspects of the BDSM interaction and their biological
basis.
Pleasure and reward
Pleasure is an integral part of the BDSM interaction, and can be experienced in different ways.
Practitioners often refer to “sub-space” and “dom-space” as the euphoric state induced by a
BDSM interaction [7]. These subjective interpretations suggest an involvement of the pleasure
and reward system in the brain.
Experiencing pleasure is related to the activity of the reward system in the brain, with at its core
dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the nucleus accumbens
(NA), which are also mediated by opioid receptors [8]. Regulatory brain networks
implementing regions such as frontal cortical areas (orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate
cortex,…) and limbic structures (hippocampus, amygdala), will regulate our behaviour and
result in a complex balance between reward-seeking and self-limiting behaviour [8].
Due to the limited methodologies allowing us to directly tap into these brain processes while
investigating rewarding behaviour, efforts have been made to identify peripheral biomarkers
that are more easily accessible while still being informative on processes involved in pleasure-
seeking behaviour. Beta-endorphin, an endogenous opioid neuropeptide, is such a peripheral
biomarker and has most often been put forward as the ‘pleasure hormone’ [9]. Opioid receptors
have been found in the abovementioned areas of brain (VTA and NA), suggesting that
endorphins will influence the pleasure and reward system in the brain. In this line, beta-
endorphin is one of the most studied as a peripheral biomarker in the context of pleasurable
activities such as physical exercise, sexual intercourse, eating, etc. [9].
Recent studies suggest, however, that blood-based assessments of beta-endorphin might not
fully reflect brain processes, including changes in the brain reward system, because these large
molecules will not directly pass the blood-brain barrier (BBB) [10]. In light of this, attention
has shifted towards the lipid-based endocannabinoids, specifically 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-
AG) and anandamide (AEA), which can pass the BBB [11]. Research implicates the role of
endocannabinoids in addiction [12, 13] but also in the reward system, depression and pain
control [14].
Sexuality
While sexual activity isn’t necessarily a part of the BDSM interaction, a play is more often than
not conducted within an erotic context [1]. In this line, a survey of Fetlife participants conducted
by our group in 2017 (n=364) indicated that 87% of the respondents experience BDSM as being
erotic and that 70% combined BDSM with sex at least regularly (unpublished data). This is
corroborated by an interview-based study in which practitioners elaborate upon the sexual
nature of their BDSM experiences [15].
Sexual motivation is closely linked to the pleasure and reward system, and the sexual pleasure
cycle depends on dopaminergic neurons of the reward system and the interacting opioid-
endocannabinoid system [16]. A recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study
showed that sexual cues activate the reward system in the brain in both men and women [17].
Beta-endorphin and dopamine are both linked to male sexual arousal [18]. Equally,
endocannabinoids are also known to influence sexual motivation [19] whereas another study
found the endocannabinoid 2-AG to significantly increase after orgasm [20].
The hypothalamus, and more specifically the paraventricular nucleus, has been implicated in
sexual activity and orgasm [21], most likely through the secretion of oxytocin and vasopressin
[22]. Both of these hormones have been linked to sexuality, though their interaction pathway is
not yet fully understood [23]. Nonetheless, oxytocin has been shown to increase VTA activation
in women as a result of sexual stimuli [24].
Sexual hormones, namely testosterone and oestrogens, are also implicated in sexual arousal by
ensuring cerebral integration between autonomic and somatic sexual systems [16]. Testosterone
plays an important part in the male sexual functioning. It modulates almost all the components
of sexual behaviour, and sexual behaviour will in turn influence testosterone concentrations
[25]. While baseline levels of testosterone are not correlated with the intensity of sexual arousal,
extremely low levels have been clearly linked to decreased sexual interest in both women and
men [26]. There is also growing evidence that testosterone therapy can be effective in increasing
sexual desire in men with sexual dysfunction and low testosterone levels as well as
postmenopausal women with low sexual desire [27, 28]. In women, the level of oestradiol also
seems to be positively correlated with sexual motivation [29].
As such, the dopaminergic driven reward system appears to play a crucial role in sexual pleasure
with several hormones such as oxytocin, vasopressin, oestrogens and testosterone to moderate
the interaction between relational connection, sexual motivation and reward.
Pain and stress
Pain is often an important part of BDSM interactions, as the dominant party will usually inflict
some type of painful stimulation upon the submissive [2]. To fully explore the aspect of pain
within a BDSM interaction, the (subjectively experienced) pain intensity needs be measured.
For example, pain perception can be conceptualised by means of visual analogue scales (VAS)
or verbal descriptor scales (VDS) [30].
An arguably more objective measurement is the pain threshold, as this gives us a quantifiable
measure that can be mapped as it fluctuates. Because of this, it is the preferred instrument in
pain research [31]. The pain threshold can be defined as “the amount of stimulus which will
just barely produce a painful sensation under given conditions” [32] as indicated by the subject.
This stimulus usually involves either pressure, temperature or exposure to erosive chemical
substances, and is often gradually up-titrated [31]. Pain thresholds are known to be influenced
by a variety of factors, including age, gender, personality traits and attachment styles [33-36].
While there is still a degree of subjectivity in measuring pain thresholds, they can give some
insight in factors influencing pain in general.
Pain (and fear of pain) will also elicit a stress reaction in the body, which is mediated by cortisol.
This hormone will react to both positive and negative stress and has been linked to BDSM
interactions on several occasions [37, 38], upon which will be elaborated below. Measuring
cortisol levels can therefore tell us more about the stress response of the body to mental or
physical discomfort.
Power dynamics
Power imbalance is a key element in the BDSM interaction, which usually includes a dominant
and submissive party or variations thereof [1]. This is reminiscent of general societal hierarchy
and status-relevant behaviour, which can be broadly divided into dominance (through induction
of fear) and prestige (through admiration and respect) [39]. Social dominance especially has
been shown to have a strong biological basis, with aggression as a common manifestation [40].
For instance the sexual hormone testosterone has been linked to both aggression [41] and social
dominance [42]. The relationship between testosterone and behaviour is complex, with no real
evidence for a correlation between baseline testosterone levels and trait aggression [41].
However, acute changes in testosterone levels in a competition context may explain differences
in aggressive reactions, both in men and women [43]. Interestingly, this correlation seems to be
mediated by trait dominance as well [44]. Recently, the importance of the stress hormone
cortisol in this dynamic has gained ground with the dual hormone hypothesis, which states that
testosterone mainly influences power dynamics when cortisol levels are low [45]. However, not
all studies have been able to replicate these results and more research will be needed to confirm
this hypothesis [41]. High levels of cortisol have also been correlated with social
submissiveness [42]. In line with this, facial dominance (i.e. the degree of dominance
interpreted from facial expression) in women has been associated with lower cortisol levels
[46].
Vasopressin and oxytocin are likewise not only involved in sexual arousal, but also in
dominance and aggression [47, 48]. In males, vasopressin tends to stimulate aggression and
sexual motivation, while it has a more inhibitory effect in females [48]. Oxytocin is widely
regarded as a prosocial hormone, being implicated in empathy, pair bonding, maternal care,
though depending on context it may also elicit antisocial effects [47].
To summarize, the dynamic between testosterone and cortisol has been shown to play an
important role in social dominance, as has the dynamic between vasopressin and oxytocin.
These hormones are also implicated in sexual motivation and sexual behaviour.
Research objective
This systematic review will summarize all peer-reviewed literature surrounding the biology of
consensual BDSM in order to assess the current state of the art and suggest directions for future
research. Because literature on this topic is limited as of yet, it is important to then place these
results in a broader biological context.
Methodology
A systematic literature search was conducted by the authors using the following inclusion and
exclusion criteria:
1) Inclusion criteria
a. Human studies including BDSM participants
b. Using a definition of BDSM that fits in the safe, sane and consensual paradigm
c. At least one biomarker assessed in the study
2) Exclusion criteria
a. Case reports, opinion articles, comment letters and essays without original data
b. Animal studies
c. Studies with a forensic population or sadomasochism in a coercive setting
These criteria were driven by the generally accepted scientific hierarchy of evidence [49]. No
time-limitation was used in the search. A systematic search was done in August 2021 on three
databases: Pubmed, Web of Science and PsycARTICLES. The search stringwas comprised of
two parts. The first part includes all terminology referencing BDSM, while the second part
includes all relevant biomarkers related to brain activity and hormones involved in pain, stress,
sexuality and pleasure as described in the introduction. This resulted in the following:
1) BDSM, masochi*, sadism, sadomasochi*
2) biolog*, biomarker, serum, plasma, blood, hormones, corticosteroid, glucocorticoid,
cortisol, endorphin, endocannabinoid, AEA, 2-AG, testosterone, oxytocin, estrogen,
vasopressin, pain threshold, brain imaging, functional magnetic resonance imaging,
MRI, magnetoencephalography, MEG, electroencephalography, EEG, event-related
potential, ERP
This search strategy resulted in a total of 10 articles which could be included from Pubmed.
The two additional databases yielded no additional results. A summary of the included articles
can be found in table 1.
-- INSERT FIGURE 1 ABOUT HERE --
-- INSERT TABLE 1 ABOUT HERE --
Results
Research on peripheral hormones
Sagarin and colleagues were the first to investigate the impact of BDSM interactions on
peripheral cortisol and testosterone levels [37]. They found that cortisol rose significantly
during the scene (i.e. the BDSM interaction) for the submissive counterparts (n=7) but not for
the dominant participants (n=6). When the submissive subjects were female (n=6), a rise in
testosterone levels was also observed. When the couple had a positive feeling about the scene,
significant reductions in cortisol levels could be seen afterward, together with a reported
increase in relationship closeness. These results were less clear in couples reporting the play to
have been of poor quality. Because of the small sample sizes, however, statistical power
remains in question. Additionally, a control group was not included to compare the levels of
cortisol and testosterone.
A later study by Klement and colleagues [38] found similar increases in cortisol levels before
and during a non-sexual BDSM ritual called ‘Dance of Souls’ which includes temporary
weighted or hooked piercings while dancing to rhythmic drums. The participants (n=67) also
reported a subjective decrease in psychological stress.
Notably, Ambler and colleagues were unable to duplicate the cortisol and testosterone effects
in their study, which included 7 switch couples who were randomly assigned a top or bottom
role [50]. Since this is the only study that did not replicate the cortisol effects, it pays to examine
the differences in study design. Firstly, it must be noted that the study contains a very small
sample size, which brings statistical power into question. Secondly, the study chose to focus on
switches . A person identifying as a switch has a greater level of BDSM role fluidity, which
allows them to switch between roles [51]. This could mean that the biological changes
associated with either a dominant or submissive role are less pronounced, although this
hypothesis hasn’t been tested as of yet.
A more recent large-scale study, conducted in the Flemish BDSM community by our group,
found several relevant changes in hormone levels when comparing the blood results of 35
BDSM couples with those of 27 non-BDSM-interested control individuals [52]. It must be
mentioned that this is not an ideal comparison, since the relationship between the dominant and
submissive party may be a confounding factor that is not accounted for in the non-dyadic
control group. Blood samples were taken at three points in time: firstly right before play,
secondly right after play and thirdly fifteen to thirty minutes after play to account for aftercare
(i.e. the period of time after play for intimate contact and reflection). ELISA analyses assessed
the plasma concentrations of beta-endorphin, endocannabinoids (AEA, 2-AG), cortisol,
testosterone, oestrogen, vasopressin and oxytocin in each of the subjects. Results showed that
both endocannabinoids and cortisol levels significantly increased in submissives during the
BDSM interaction and that these increases were intercorrelated, which suggests that the
submissives indeed experienced the BDSM interaction as rewarding and pleasurable, and that
this experience was related to the stress levels invoked during play. The type of play seemed to
impact hormones related to reward differently in submissives and dominants. Whereas
increases in endocannabinoids were mainly related to impact play (i.e. pain play) in
submissives, significant increases in endocannabinoid levels in dominants were only found in
those focusing on power play in their interaction. Oxytocin was found to be largely unchanged
in the total group. However, when looking into the dominant group, a significant difference
between men and women could be found, with female dominants having higher oxytocin levels
after the play, which was not found in their male peers (unpublished data). This seems to suggest
that BDSM interactions lead to more feelings of attachment and closeness in female dominants.
No significant changes were found in levels of beta-endorphin, testosterone, oestrogen or
vasopressin.
Taken together, there is clear evidence for cortisol changes in submissives linked to a BDSM
interaction, which suggests involvement of the physiological stress system. As our study also
showed, endocannabinoid changes in submissives suggest that the pleasure and reward system
is likewise involved, mainly driven by pain play. In dominants, this biologically measured
pleasure seemed to be dependent on power play rather than pain play. The role of testosterone
and oxytocin is less evident and should ideally be explored in further research to see if the
above-mentioned results can be replicated.
Research on pain thresholds
The study conducted by our group described above [53] also collected pain threshold data
before and after interaction, using both a pressure and temperature stimulus. These findings
suggest that both the dominant and submissive group have an overall higher heat pain threshold
than the control group. These differences in the submissive group seemed to be driven by
minimalizing assumptions and cognitions about pain in general. Additionally, submissives
showed a trend towards a temporary additional increase in their heat pain threshold directly
after a BDSM interaction.
Defrin and colleagues [54] confirmed the presence of higher pressure pain thresholds in
masochistic individuals (n=17) compared to controls (n=17). This study would have also
benefited from the inclusion of other BDSM identities to compare pain thresholds and pain
cognitions. Pollok et al. also found that their masochistic group (n=10) consistently rated
painful sensations as more pleasant than the control group, indicating a different approach to
pain even outside the BDSM context [55].
These are controversial findings, since other literature suggests that a decreased pain sensitivity
is only present in submissives within the context of the BDSM interaction [1, 56]. This pain
threshold literature suggests, however, that submissives respond differently to painful stimuli
regardless of context as well.
Research on functional brain imaging
The biological aspects of BDSM can also be researched by looking at brain functioning.
Functional neuroimaging is a technology that allows us to see which parts of the brain are active
during specific mental functions (e.g. when looking at certain pictures, or when performing a
specific task). fMRI is such an imaging technique.
Kamping and colleagues researched the contextual modulation of pain in masochists (n=16)
compared to a control group (n=16), specifically employing fMRI [56]. They found that painful
stimuli were reported as substantially reduced in experienced intensity when paired with
masochistic images. The fMRI data suggests that this context-dependent pain modulation takes
place in the parietal operculum, a brain region that has been implicated in the detection of tactile
and sensorial input, including painful stimuli [57]. Moreover, tactile stimulation involving the
parietal operculum has also been associated to the activity of the ventral striatum, part of the
brain reward system [58]. An interesting addition to this study would have been to include other
BDSM identities such as dominants, to further investigate the importance of the BDSM context
on pain perception.
Stark and colleagues [59] likewise used the fMRI technique, only they were interested in the
emotional processing differences of different stimuli. An SM-interested group (n=12) and a
non-SM-interested group (n=12) were presented with visual stimuli of a neutral, disgusting,
erotic or sadomasochistic nature, while regions of interest concerning emotional processing
were measured by fMRI. While the non-SM group experienced the sadomasochistic pictures in
a similar way to the disgust-inducing pictures, the SM group reacted similarly to the
sadomasochistic images as they did to the erotic images, with an activation of the ventral
striatum. As mentioned above, this is implicated in the pleasure and reward system [58], which
is in turn implicated in both sexual arousal [16] and by means of peripheral hormones in BDSM
interactions as well [52]. Despite the interesting premise, the researchers don’t focus on the
neurobiology of BDSM but rather use the SM group as a means of differentiating between
erotic and disgust-inducing reactions in the brain. Because of this, the outcome of the study is
not necessarily focused on the biology of BDSM and the implications of their results are not
discussed as such.
Pollok and colleagues [55] conducted research regarding the difference in pain sensitivity
between masochistic individuals (n=10),patients with fibromyalgia (n=10) (a functional
disorder, i.e. a disorder with no detectable structural abnormalities , which is characterized by
generalised pain) and a control group (n=10). This study used magnetoencephalography
(MEG), another type of functional neuroimaging. They found that the process of sensory gating
(i.e. attenuation after repetitive tactile stimuli) is not activated in the masochistic group,
suggesting that these innocuous stimuli are not filtered out as irrelevant. The authors theorized
this decreased sensory gating may be due to a decreased cortical excitability in the primary
somatosensory cortex, perhaps explaining why painful sensations are considered less aversive
by masochists. Important to note is that, like other studies included here, the small sample size
complicates statistical analyses. An interesting addition to this study would have been to include
other BDSM identities such as dominants, to further investigate differences in pain sensitivity
for BDSM-interested individuals.
Luo and Zhang [60] have endeavoured to measure empathy in female submissives (n=32)
compared to controls (n=32) by means of electroencephalography (EEG) and measuring event-
related potentials (ERP). ERP are EEG changes that are time locked to sensory, motor or
cognitive events and can be seen as correlates of mental processes [61]. In their study, Luo et
al. asked participants to look at pictures of women exhibiting signs of fear or pain. They found
differential amplitudes in the fronto-central N1 and P2 and the central/parietal late LPP, which
suggests weakened empathy responses to other people’s suffering and diminished ability to
code the painful expressions as threatening messages in female submissives. This is in line with
comparable research, which showed that physicians also have weakened empathy responses,
presumably due to frequent exposure to people experiencing pain [62]. Remarkably, the survey
part of their study, which gauged empathy traits and empathic ability in general BDSM
practitioners versus controls, also found this decreased empathic ability in submissive women
but not in female dominants or male practitioners, either dominant or submissive. This might
suggest that being in the submissive role influences the empathic ability of women more than
it does men, or that the degree of empathy might steer an interest in submissive behaviour in
women. An interesting addition to this research would have been to include more general
BDSM practitioners in the EEG part of their study as well, to investigate differences in empathy
more profoundly.
Waismann and colleagues [63] equally employ EEG and ERP, differentiating between
responses to visual erotic stimuli in men with a paraphilic interest (n=28) and men without
(n=34). They defined paraphilic interest specifically as having a fetishistic or sadomasochistic
and recruited from community sources, not through medical channels. It is important to note
that they do not differentiate in BDSM identity or experience within the sadomasochistic group.
Both groups were shown slides of either an erotic, a sadomasochistic or a neutral nature. They
found a significant ERP difference in P600, where the paraphilic group had a higher P600
amplitude in response to the paraphilic and the neutral slides, especially in the left frontal cortex.
The non-paraphilic group had a higher P600 amplitude in response to the erotic slides,
specifically in the right parietal area. At other areas, both groups had a high P600 amplitude to
erotic slides. Since P600 is a late component of the ERP, the authors suggest that it is not merely
a sensory response, but a response of recognizing familiar stimuli. The strong response in the
left frontal cortex for the paraphilic group is explained by the authors because of the important
social implications of paraphilic activities, while the right parietal area is mostly involved in
visual association and pattern recognition. The authors go on to discuss the clinical implications
of measuring erotic preference, though it remains unclear why this would need to be objectified
in a clinical context.
Taken together, research into brain region activity patterns related to BDSM interest is
fragmented and very limited, but suggests a role for the parietal operculum [56] and ventral
striatum [59] in the context of the pleasure and reward system, the primary and secondary
somatosensory cortex [55] in the context of pain perception, empathy-related circuits such as
the anterior insula (AI), anterior midcingulate cortex (ACC) and sensorimotor cortex [60] and
the left frontal cortex [63] in the context of social and sexual interactions.
Discussion
Despite the limited research at our disposal, the ten studies included in this review demonstrate
that biological mechanisms underlie both aspects of a BDSM interaction as characteristics
related to BDSM interest. However, it should be noted that the biological processes associated
with BDSM interactions are not necessarily the same as those involved in the development of
BDSM interest.
The neurobiological differences suggest several traits specific to BDSM-interested individuals,
such as differences in pain perception, empathy circuits, pleasure and reward system and social
and sexual systems. However, in the scope of this discussion we will focus on the state changes
related to the BDSM interaction itself.
The hormonal differences found in several studies suggest subjective BDSM interplay to be
related to experiencing stress, pleasure and relational bonding, which may explain the
reinforcing nature of these interactions in BDSM practitioners. These biological processes may
also reflect a biopsychological predisposition for these interests, as corroborated by the fact that
BDSM interest frequently manifests at an early age, often before fifteen years of age, as seen
in a study by our group [2]. In this line, Ten Brink et al. have found that intensity of BDSM
interest was predicted by a secure attachment style amongst others [64].
In the following section, we will endeavour to integrate the state-dependent research done in a
BDSM context with research on the broader biological interaction between pleasure, pain,
power dynamics and sexuality.
Pleasure and pain
Biological processes involved in experiencing pleasure and pain seem to be strongly
interweaved. The endocannabinoid system is known to influence not only the experience of
pleasure and reward but also that of painful sensations [65]. As such, stressful activities have
often been associated with pleasurable effects. A few examples of this are extreme sports, roller
coaster riding, watching horror films, long-distance running and body modification. These
leisure activities could be likened to BDSM, in the sense that the generally unpleasant aspect
of pain or stress is interpreted as pleasurable and desirable in those specific contexts.
Interestingly, research by our group has shown that BDSM practitioners report higher levels of
sensation seeking (thrill seeking, experience seeking and distraction seeking) [66], which is also
seen in individuals seeking out earlier mentioned activities such as extreme sports [67]. The
same links have been found in liking spicy flavours, where it is hypothesized that some people
eat increasingly spicy food in the context of thrill-seeking behaviour, because of the endorphin
release [68]. Spicy food has also been known to increase pain thresholds [69].
The runner’s high, for instance, is a subjective euphoric state induced by long-distance running
and is an example of a physically stressful situation with a pleasurable effect. Cortisol increases
are seen after high-intensity exercise, suggesting a stress-response from the body [70].
Similarly, increases in both endorphins and endocannabinoids have also been found in long-
distance running, suggesting a pleasurable feeling that is subjectively reported by runners as
well [11, 71]. These hormonal changes are very similar to those found in our group of BDSM
practitioners, which also demonstrated an association between the cortisol and endocannabinoid
levels [52].
Not only physical but also psychological stress seems to have these effects as watching horror
films has been associated with both stress and pleasure [72]. A study researching the effect of
violent films on a cohort of young women found increases in cortisol and beta-endorphins,
suggesting the involvement of both the stress and pleasure system [73]. So, as with high-
intensity sports or watching horror films, the experience of BDSM interactions as a physical
and/or psychological stressful event equally seems to lead to increases in endocannabinoids,
consequentially resulting in feelings of reward and a euphoric state after the interaction, which
may well be associated to the mental state referred to as ‘sub-space’ or ‘dom-space’.
Body modification, i.e. tattooing, piercing or scarification, is another example of an activity
clearly associated with pain, and yet actively sought out by some people. A study by
Yamamotovo and colleagues suggests that thermal pain thresholds are strongly influenced by
the context in which the modification is done [74]. Remarkably, Kamping and colleagues came
to the same conclusion when looking at pain perception in masochistic individuals [56]. To
what extent this difference in pain perception is caused by the BDSM context remains to be
seen, since other studies have found this difference regardless of context as mentioned above
[53-55].
Sexuality and pain
Sexual arousal is known to influence pain, with orgasm decreasing pain sensitivity [75] and
sexual activity increasing the pain threshold [21]. Interestingly, oxytocin, typically increased
during intimacy and orgasm, is also known to be secreted in stressful situations and is
sometimes considered as “stress-coping molecule” [23]. Close contact sports could also have
an effect on social bonding, as seen in a study by Rassovsky et al. where oxytocin increased as
a result of certain types of martial arts [76]. Though Sagarin and colleagues didn’t measure
oxytocin specifically, they did find a link between decreases in cortisol and increases in
relationship closeness as a result of a positive play, which implicates this prosocial hormone
[37]. Our study has not found a significant oxytocin change in submissive participants, so the
significance of this hormone remains unclear. It would be an interesting avenue in further
BDSM research to study the link between a BDSM interaction, relationship closeness and
oxytocin.
Pleasure and power
Social dominance has been known to stimulate the reward system [77] and similarly, social
defeat can induce anhedonia, which also suggests an interaction between power play,
dominance and the reward system [78]. These effects may be culturally influenced, however,
as shown in a study by Freeman et al. [79], where a dominance-reinforcing culture shows links
between dominant behaviour and activation of the reward system, and a subordinate-reinforcing
culture shows links between subordinate behaviour and activation of the reward system. Our
study confirmed this link between endocannabinoid increase and power play in dominants [52],
suggesting a state change as a result of dominant behaviour. Further research could also look at
any differences regardless of context, such as trait dominance.
Sexuality and power
As seen in the introduction, several hormones implicated in sexuality also play an important
role in social power structures [25, 26, 41, 42]. . Sexual arousal as a result of dominance or
submission has even been suggested as a mating strategy, resulting in increased reproductive
success [80]. It is hypothesised that this increased success is a result of on the one hand a need
for a partner with a high status (e.g. dominant) and on the other hand a low-ranking partner that
is less prone to infidelity [81].
The fact that hormones such as testosterone, oxytocin and vasopressin are involved in both
sexual behaviour and social hierarchy, strengthens this hypothesis. For instance, one study has
found that oxytocin plays an important role in empathic responses to a sadistic context [82]. In
our study, an increase in oxytocin was found specifically in female dominants (unpublished
data), suggesting a difference in intimacy or attachment between female and male dominants
when it comes to BDSM interactions. Sex differences in oxytocin are known [83], though not
understood enough to explain these differences. The oxytonergic system would be an
interesting avenue of future BDSM research, given its implications in these different biological
processes.
Comparisons to coercive sadism:
When discussing BDSM as a safe, sane and consensual practice, it is important to differentiate
it from pathological behaviour such as coercive sadism, as mentioned in the introduction.
Victims of coercive sadistic practices have not given consent and do not have control, in
contrast to submissives in a consensual BDSM interaction [4]. Likewise, dominants in a
consensual BDSM relationship are a very separate group from coercive sadists. Recent
literature applying cluster analyses on a range of sexual fantasies and behaviours confirms this
difference between BDSM interest and coercive sexual behaviour [84].
As with research on the biology of BDSM, biological processes behind coercive sadism have
not been fully explored, and most literature will look more broadly at the biology of sexual
offending in general, or paraphilic disorders in general. We will discuss these results briefly
and compare them to what is known about BDSM.
A very recent study on peripheral hormones in coercive sadists has shown that testosterone
levels increased when looking at videos of people in emotional distress [85]. This effect was
positively correlated to the subjects’ scores on the Severe Sexual Sadism Scale. The two BDSM
studies that measured testosterone levels in dominants did not find a similar increase [37, 52].
A neuroimaging study compared sadistic sexual offenders with non-sadistic sexual offenders
and a control group [86]. They found increased activity in the left amygdala for the sadistic
group as a response to images depicting inflicted pain, as well as a greater connectivity between
the left amygdala and the right anterior insula. The sadistic group also consistently rated pain
severity higher than the non-sadistic groups, which was positively correlated with anterior
insula activity. The authors argue that involvement of the amygdala links the pain-pictures to
sexual arousal in sadists, and that the anterior insula signifies that rather than callousness
towards pain, sadists draw from a subjective emotional experience when they evaluate pain
severity. To our knowledge, no comparative studies exist that measure the brain activity
patterns of BDSM participants when looking at non-sadomasochistic, pain-depicting images.
However, Erickson and Sagarin did demonstrate that BDSM sadists demonstrate prosocial
sadism (e.g. where consent is explicit) and not everyday sadism [87].
More generally, research on sexual offending finds abnormalities in frontal, temporal and
limbic regions [88-90]. This suggests the presence of more bottom-up driven behaviour in
coercive sadists, associated with cognitive impairment, reductions in impulse controland
emotional regulation problems that are thus far not seen in BDSM participants [1].
Additional research on dominant behaviour within the BDSM context may help with illustrating
further differences between consensual sexual dominance or sadism on one hand and coercive
sadism on the other.
Limitations
There are several limitations to this review that need to be addressed.
Firstly, the lack of consensus regarding the definition of BDSM poses some challenges. This
results for instance in a difference of terminology used in the included studies. Some studies
will reference the submissive party as “bottoms”, others as “masochists” or “submissives”. The
same is true for the dominant party. Another difficulty in this heterogeneous terminology is the
sexual component. While BDSM is often linked with sexual activity, not all BDSM
practitioners agree with this [91]. The role of sexuality remains a topic of discussion in the
scientific community [1].
Another important bias to address is the WEIRD bias. This states that most studies still focus
on western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic societies [92]. When we review the
ten studies included in this review, we must conclude that this is the case for all but two (see
table 1). This has of course potential implications for the generalizability of the study results.
International studies are needed to assess what cultural and societal differences may arise.
What must also be mentioned is the distinct lack of studies in this particular field, which means
that most of the results have not as of yet been replicated in other research. This means that it
is difficult to draw conclusions on both trait and state findings, and that causal implications
cannot be made. Small sample sizes also diminish the statistical power of the results.
Clinical implications
As our understanding of the biology of BDSM grows, so does the opportunity to help in the
destigmatization of BDSM in general. Historically, it has been pathologized by its inclusion in
for instance the Diagnostic and Statistical Manuel of Mental Disorders (DSM) and the
International Classification of Diseases (ICD). Though there has been some progress, it is still
included in the 5th edition (DSM-5) today as “sexual sadism”, “sexual masochism” and
“fetishism” [93]. On a more promising note, those diagnoses have been eliminated from the
most recent 11th edition of the ICD, replaced instead by “coercive sexual sadism disorder” [94].
By normalizing the biological processes that underlie BDSM activities, we hope to strengthen
the argument that it does not belong in the psychiatric or forensic field and needs to be firmly
distinguished from paraphilias as described in the DSM or ICD.
Conclusion
BDSM refers to a broad set of behavioural, relational and sexual interactions and is influenced
by several psychological, social and biological processes. Because it is not easily defined and
encompasses many aspects of pain, pleasure, sexuality and power structures, the biological
mechanisms associated with BDSM will be equally broad.
As for the important aspect of pain within the BDSM interaction, Dunkley and colleagues have
made an integrative model of how pain may be processed as pleasurable in the context of BDSM
[95]. This model draws on the existing psychological processes known to be involved in BDSM,
such as the altered states of consciousness (e.g. “sub-space”), sexual arousal, social bonding,
the importance of control and volition, etc. They use these to theorize on the process of
experiencing pain as a welcome sensation. The model also encompasses several biological
factors which are discussed in this review as well. They implicate the importance of the pleasure
and reward system to modulate painful sensations through dopamine and endocannabinoids, as
well as sexual arousal through oxytocin. Lastly, they also link cortisol increases to the
involvement of the stress system.
We have endeavoured to summarize the known biological processes in a model, by drawing on
these different aspects, as well power structures (see figure 2). The pain and power dynamics
which are so often present in a BDSM interaction will translate biologically in the activation of
several hormones such as cortisol, testosterone and vasopressin. Of these hormones, cortisol
has been most strongly implicated in BDSM interactions, with several studies finding evidence
for a physical stress reaction in the body during a BDSM play. Testosterone is likewise
implicated in female submissives [37], though this has yet to be replicated. Meanwhile,
experience of pleasure and sexuality, regulated by different hormones such as
endocannabinoids, beta-endorphin, oxytocin and sex hormones, will colour and direct the
BDSM experience and influence the experience of pain and power dynamics as well. Of these,
the endocannabinoids have been found to change because of a BDSM interaction [52],
suggesting a clear involvement of the pleasure and reward system. Oxytocin was implicated in
female dominants in the same study, though this has not been investigated further by other
research. Future scientific research will help to shed further light on these biological processes
and hopefully contribute to reducing the stigma that BDSM practitioners still endure in our
society.
-- INSERT FIGURE 2 ABOUT HERE --
Table 1: included studies on biology of BDSM
Study
Population
Methodology
Results
Waismann et
al. (2003)
UK
Paraphilic
(fetishistic and
sadomasochistic)
men (n=28; mean
age 36)
versus non-
paraphilic
heterosexual men
(n=34; mean age
29)
ERP measured by means
of EEG as population was
presented with visual
stimuli of erotic,
sadomasochistic or neutral
slides
In the paraphilic group
strong P600 responses in
the left frontal cortex to
the paraphilic stimuli. In
the control group strong
P600 responses in the
right parietal area to the
erotic slides.
Stark et al.
(2005)
Germany
Group with
sadomasochistic
interest (n=12; 6
female; mean age
28) versus group
without
sadomasochistic
interest (n=12; 6
female; mean age
28)
fMRI to measure regions
of interest concerned with
emotional processing as
population was presented
with visual stimuli of a
neutral, disgust-inducing,
erotic or sadomasochistic
nature
The sadomasochistic
group had equal positive
reactions to the erotic and
the sadomasochistic
pictures, which activated
mainly the ventral
striatum, implicated in the
pleasure and reward
system
Sagarin et al.
(2009)
USA
Sadomasochistic
practitioners
(n=13; 6 female;
mean age 45)
Salivary samples were
taken before and after a
BDSM interaction to
measure cortisol and
testosterone levels; two
relationship closeness
measures were taken
Increase of cortisol in
bottoms; increase in
testosterone in female
bottoms; decrease of
cortisol and increase of
relationship closeness
later on if positive feeling
about the scene
Pollok et al.
(2010)
Masochistic
individuals (n=10:
MEG data were measured
while administering a
No sensory gating in
masochists after repetitive
Germany
5 female; mean
age 39) versus
fibromyalgia
patients (n=10; 9
female; mean age
54) versus
controls matched
in age and gender
conditioning stimulus
followed by a tactile test
stimulus; MRI images
were taken to corroborate
MEG data; pain thresholds
were measured before and
after stimulus
tactile stimuli; higher pain
thresholds for masochists
versus controls;
involvement of
somatosensory cortex in
pain thresholds
Defrin et al.
(2015)
Israel
Masochistic
individuals (n=17;
7 female; mean
age 28) versus
control group
(n=17; 8 female;
mean age 28)
Pain thresholds, pain
cognitions
Higher pressure pain
thresholds in masochists
Kamping et
al. (2016)
Germany
Masochistic
individuals (n=16;
8 female; mean
age 42) versus
control group
(n=16; 12 female;
mean age 40)
fMRI to measure regions
of interest concerning pain
perception and modulation
as population was
presented with visual
stimuli of a masochistic,
neutral, positive or
negative nature while also
pairing a painful laser
stimulus; pain perception
measured by visual
analogue scale
Reduced pain perception
of masochists in BDSM
context; involvement of
parietal operculum in pain
modulation
Klement et
al. (2017)
USA
Extreme ritual
“Dance of Souls”
participants
(n=67; 33 female;
mean age 49)
Salivary samples were
taken before and after the
“Dance of Souls” to
measure cortisol levels
Increase of cortisol in
participants undergoing
the ritual
Luo et al.
(2018)
China
Masochistic
women (n=32;
mean age 21)
versus non-
masochistic
women (n=32;
mean age 21)
ERP measured by means
of EEG as population was
presented with images of
female faces with either a
neutral or painful
expression in either a
general or BDSM-related
context
Weakened empathic
responses to fear or pain
by masochists;
involvement of AI, ACC
and sensorimotor cortex
Wuyts et al.
(2020)
Belgium
Dominant BDSM
practitioners
(n=34; 9 female;
mean age 44)
versus submissive
BDSM
practitioners
(n=33; 24 female;
mean age 38)
versus controls
(n=24; 11 female;
mean age 34)
Blood samples were taken
before, right after, and
15min after a BDSM
interaction to measure
levels of cortisol, beta-
endorphin,
endocannabinoids,
testosterone, oestrogen,
oxytocin by means of
ELISA
Associated increase of
both cortisol and
endocannabinoids;
increase of oxytocin in
female dominants
compared to male
counterparts
Wuyts et al.
(2021)
Belgium
Dominant BDSM
practitioners
(n=34; 9 female;
mean age 44)
versus submissive
BDSM
practitioners
(n=33; 24 female;
mean age 38)
versus controls
(n=24; 11 female;
mean age 34)
Pain thresholds were
measured by means of a
pressure and temperature
stimulus before, right
after, and 15min after a
BDSM interaction; pain
cognitions were measured
by means of the PCS and
FPQ
Higher heat pain
thresholds in BDSM
participants; increase of
heat pain threshold in
submissives
ERP = event related potentials ; EEG = electroencephalography ; fMRI = functional magnetic
resonance imaging ; MEG = magnetoencephalography ; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging ;
AI = anterior insula ; ACC = anterior midcingulate cortex ; ELISA = enzyme linked
immunosorbent assays ; PCS = pain catastrophizing scale ; FPQ = fear of pain questionnaire
Figure 1: Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols
(PRISMA) flowchart
Figure 2: biology of BDSM
DA = dopamine; 2-AG = 2-arachidonoylglycerol; AEA = anandamide; HPA-axis =
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis
References
1.#De#Neef,#N.,#et#al.,#Bondage-Discipline,0Dominance-Submission0and0Sadomasochism0
(BDSM)0From0an0Integrative0Biopsychosocial0Perspective:0A0Systematic0Review.#Sex#
Med,#2019.#
2.#Coppens,#V.,#et#al.,#A0Survey0on0BDSM-related0Activities:0BDSM0Experience0Correlates0
with0Age0of0First0Exposure,0Interest0Profile,0and0Role0Identity.#J#Sex#Res,#2019:#p.#1-8.#
3.#Nielsen,# M.E.J.,# Safe,0 Sane,0 and0 Consensual—Consent0 and0 the0 Ethics0 of0 BDSM.#
International#Journal#of#Applied#Philosophy,#2010.#24(2):#p.#265-288.#
4.#Mokros,# A.,# et# al.,# Coercive0 Sexual0 Sadism:0 a0 Systematic0 Qualitative0 Review.#Curr#
Psychiatry#Rep,#2019.#21(12):#p.#135.#
5.#Simula,#B.,#Pleasure,0power,0and0pain:0A0review0of0the0literature0on0the0experiences0of0
BDSM0participants.#Sociology#Compass,#2019.#
6.#Holvoet,# L.,# et# al.,# Fifty0 Shades0 of0 Belgian0 Gray:0 The0 Prevalence0 of0 BDSM-Related0
Fantasies0and0Activities0in0the0General0Population.#J#Sex#Med,#2017.#14(9):#p.#1152-
1159.#
7.#Pitagora,#D.,#No0Pain,0No0Gain?:0Therapeutic0and0Relational0Benefits0of0Subspace0in0
BDSM0Contexts.#Journal#of#Positive#Sexuality#2017.#3:#p.#44-54.#
8.#Higgins,# E.S.# and# M.S.# George,# Neuroscience0 of0 clinical0 psychiatry0 :0 the0
pathophysiology0of0behavior0and0mental0illness.#
9.#Jamurtas,# A.Z.,# et# al.,#The0 effects0 of0 low0 and0 high0 glycemic0index0foods0on0exercise0
performance0and0beta-endorphin0responses.#J#Int#Soc#Sports#Nutr,#2011.#8:#p.#15.#
10.#Veening,# J.G.# and# H.P.# Barendregt,# The0 effects0 of0 beta-endorphin:0 state0 change0
modification.#Fluids#Barriers#CNS,#2015.#12:#p.#3.#
11.#Dietrich,# A.# and# W.F.# McDaniel,# Endocan nabinoids0 and0 ex ercise.#Br#J#Sports#Med,#
2004.#38(5):#p.#536-41.#
12.#Gardner,# E.L.,# Addiction0 and0 brain0 reward0 and0 antireward0 pathways.#Adv#
Psychosom#Med,#2011.#30:#p.#22-60.#
13.#Chye,# Y.,# et# al.,# The0 Endocannabinoid0 System0 and0 Cannabidiol's0 Promise0 for0 the0
Treatment0of0Substance0Use0Disorder.#Front#Psychiatry,#2019.#10:#p.#63.#
14.# Huang,#W.J.,#W.W.#Chen,#and#X.#Zhang,#Endocannabinoid0system:0Role0in0depression,0
reward0and0pain0control0(Review).#Mol#Med#Rep,#2016.#14(4):#p.#2899-903.#
15.#Simula,# B.L.,# A0 "Different0 Economy0 of0 Bodies0 and0 Pleasures"?:0 Differentiating0 and0
Evaluating0Sex0and0Sexual0BDSM0Experiences.#J#Homosex,#2017:#p.#1-29.#
16.# Calabro,# R.S.,# et# al.,# Neuroanatomy0 and0 function0 of0 human0 sexual0 behavior:0 A0
neglected0or0unknown0issue?#Brain#Behav,#2019.#9(12):#p.#e01389.#
17.# Stark,#R.,#et#al.,#No0Sex0Difference0Found:0Cues0of0Sexual0Stimuli0Activate0the0Reward0
System0in0both0Sexes.#Neuroscience,#2019.#416:#p.#63-73.#
18.#van# Furth,# W.R.# and# J.M.# van# R ee,# Sexual0 motivation:0 involvement0 of0 endogenous0
opioids0in0the0ventral0tegmental0area.#Brain#Res,#1996.#729(1):#p.#20-8.#
19.#Canseco-Alba,# A.# and# G.# Rodriguez-Manzo,# Sexual0 interaction0 is0 essential0 for0 the0
transformation0 of0 non-copulating0 rats0 into0 sexually0 active0 animals0 by0 the0
endocannabinoid0anandamide.#Behav#Brain#Res,#2019.#359:#p.#418-427.#
20.#Fuss,# J.,# et# al.,# Masturbation0 to0 Orgasm0 Stimulates0 the0 Release0 of0 the0
Endocannabinoid0 2-Arachidonoylglycerol0 in0 Humans.#J#Sex# Med,#2017.# 14(11):# p.#
1372-1379.#
21.#Komisaruk,#B.R.#and#B.#Whipple,#Evidence0 that0 vaginal0 self-stimulation0 in0women0
suppresses0 experimentally-induced0 finger0 pain.#In# Society# for# Neuroscience#
Abstracts,#1984.#10:#p.#675.#
22.#Argiolas,#A.#and#M.#Rosaria#Melis,#Neuromodulation0of0penile0erection:0an0overview0
of0the0role0of0neurotransmitters0and0neuropeptides.#Prog#Neurobiol,#1995.#47(4-5):#
p.#235-55.#
23.#Carter,# C.S.,# The0 Oxytocin-Vasopressin0 Pathway0 in0 the0 Context0 of0 Love0 and0 Fear.#
Front#Endocrinol#(Lausanne),#2017.#8:#p.#356.#
24.#Gregory,#R.,#et#al.,#Oxytocin0increases0VTA0activation0to0infant0and0sexual0stimuli0in0
nulliparous0and0postpartum0women.#Horm#Behav,#2015.#69:#p.#82-8.#
25.#Jordan,# K.,# et# al.,# The0 role0 of0 testosterone0 in0 sexuality0 and0 paraphilia--a0
neurobiological0approach.0Part0I:0testosterone0and0sexuality.#J#Sex#Med,#2011.#8(11):#
p.#2993-3007.#
26.#Andersen,#M.L.#and#S.#Tufik,#Does0male0sexual0behavior0require0progesterone?#Brain#
Res#Rev,#2006.#51(1):#p.#136-43.#
27.# Islam,#R.M.,#et#al.,#Safety0and0efficacy0of0testosterone0for0women:0a0systematic0review0
and0meta-analysis0of0randomised0controlled0trial0data.#Lancet#Diabetes#Endocrinol,#
2019.#7(10):#p.#754-766.#
28.#Dimitropoulos,#K.,#et#al.,#What0are0the0benefits0and0harms0of0testosterone0therapy0for0
male0sexual0dysfunction?-a0systematic0review.#Int#J#Impot#Res,#2019.#31(6):#p.#380-
391.#
29.#Motta-Mena,#N.V.#and#D.A.#Puts,#Endocrinology0of0human0female0sexuality,0mating,0
and0reproductive0behavior.#Horm#Behav,#2017.#91:#p.#19-35.#
30.#Rosier,#E.M.,#M.J.#Iadarola,#and#R.C.#Coghill,#Reproducibility0of0pain0measurement0and0
pain0perception.#Pain,#2002.#98(1-2):#p.#205-16.#
31.#Roldan,# C.J.# and# S.# Abdi,# Quantitative0 sensory0 testing0 in0 pain0 management.#Pain#
Manag,#2015.#5(6):#p.#483-91.#
32.# Hardy,#J.D.,#H.G.#Wolff,#and#H.#Goodell,#The0pain0threshold0in0man.#American#Journal#
of#Psychiatry,#1943.#99(5):#p.#744-751.#
33.#Lue,#Y.J.,#et#al.,#Thermal0pain0tolerance0and0pain0rating0in0normal0subjects:0Gender0
and0age0effects.#Eur#J#Pain,#2018.#22(6):#p.#1035-1042.#
34.#Haslam,# D.R.,# Individual0 differences0 in0 pain0 threshold0 and0 level0 of0 arousal.#Br# J#
Psychol,#1967.#58(1):#p.#139-42.#
35.#Goubert,# L.,# G.# Crombez,# and# S.# Van# Damme,# The0 role0 of0 neuroticism,0 pain0
catastrophizing0and0pain-related0 fear0 in0 vigilance0 to0 pain:0 a0 structural0 equations 0
approach.#Pain,#2004.#107(3):#p.#234-41.#
36.#Meredith,# P.J.,# J.# Strong,#and# J.A.# Feeney,# The0 relationship0 of0adult0 attachment0 to0
emotion,0 catastrophizing,0 control,0 threshold0 and0 tolerance,0 in0 experimentally-
induced0pain.#Pain,#2006.#120(1-2):#p.#44-52.#
37.#Sagarin,# B.J.,# et# al.,# Hormonal0 changes0 and0 couple0 bonding0 in0 consensual0
sadomasochistic0activity.#Arch#Sex#Behav,#2009.#38(2):#p.#186-200.#
38.#Klement,# K.R.,# et# al.,# Extreme0 rituals0 in0 a0 BDSM0 context:0 the0 physiological0 and0
psychological0effects0of0the0 'Dance0 of0Souls'.#Cult# Health# Sex,# 2017.# 19(4):# p.# 453-
469.#
39.#Redhead,#D.J.,#et#al.,#On0the0dynamics0of0social0hierarchy:0A0longitudinal0investigation0
of0the0rise0and0fall0of0prestige,0dominance,0and0social0rank0in0naturalistic0task0groups.#
Evolution#and#Human#Behavior,#2019.#40(2):#p.#222-234.#
40.#Francis,# R.C.,# On0 the0 Relationship0 between0 Aggression0 and0 Social0 Dominance.#
International#Journal#of#Behavioural#Biology,#1988.#78(3):#p.#223-237.#
41.#Carre,#J.M.#and#J.#Archer,#Testosterone0and0human0behavior:0the0 role0of0individual0
and0contextual0variables.#Curr#Opin#Psychol,#2018.#19:#p.#149-153.#
42.#van# der# Westhuizen,# D.# and# M.# Solms,# Social0 dominance0 and0 the0 Affective0
Neuroscience0Personality0Scales.#Conscious#Cogn,#2015.#33:#p.#90-111.#
43.#Carre,# J.M.# and# N.A.# Olmstead,# Social0 neuroendocrinology0 of0 human0 aggression:0
examining0 the0 role0 of0 competition-induced0 testosterone0 dynamics.#Neuroscience,#
2015.#286:#p.#171-86.#
44.#Carre,#J.M.,#et#al.,#Exogenous0Testosterone0Rapidly0Increases0Aggressive0Behavior0in0
Dominant0and0Impulsive0Men.#Biol#Psychiatry,#2017.#82(4):#p.#249-256.#
45.#Dekkers,# T.J.,# et# al.,# A0meta-analytical0evaluation0of0the0 dual-hormone0hypothesis:0
Does0cortisol0moderate0the0relationship0between0testosterone0and0status,0dominance,0
risk0taking,0aggression,0and0psychopathy?#Neurosci#Biobehav#Rev,#2019.#96:#p.#250-
271.#
46.#Gonzalez-Santoyo,#I.,#et#al.,#The0face0of0 female0dominance:0Women0with0dominant0
faces0have0lower0cortisol.#Horm#Behav,#2015.#71:#p.#16-21.#
47.#Jiang,#Y.#and#M.L.#Platt,#Oxytocin0and0vasopressin0flatten0dominance0hierarchy0and0
enhance0behavioral0synchrony0in0part0via0anterior0cingulate0cortex.#Sci#Rep,#2018.#
8(1):#p.#8201.#
48.#Terranova,#J.I.,#et#al.,#Serotonin0and0arginine-vasopressin0mediate0sex0differences0in0
the0regulation0of0dominance0and0aggression0by0the0social0brain.#Proc#Natl#Acad#Sci#
U#S#A,#2016.#113(46):#p.#13233-13238.#
49.#Burns,#P.B.,#R.J.#Rohrich,#and#K.C.# Chung,#The0 levels0 of0 evidence0 and0 their0 role0 in 0
evidence-based0medicine.#Plast#Reconstr#Surg,#2011.#128(1):#p.#305-310.#
50.#Ambler,# J.K.,# et# al.,# Consensual0 BDSM0 facilitates0 role-specific0 altered0 states0 of0
consciousness:0 A0 preliminary0 study.#Psychology# of# Consciousness:# Theory,#
Research,#and#Practice,#2017.#4(1):#p.#75-91.#
51.#Martinez,# K.,# BDSM0 Role0 Fluidity:0 A0 Mixed-Methods0 Approach0 to0 Investigating0
Switches0Within0Dominant/Submissive0Binaries.#J#Homosex,#2018.#65(10):#p.#1299-
1324.#
52.#Wuyts,# E.,# et# al.,# Between0 Pleasure0 and0 Pain:0 A0 Pilot0 Study0 on0 the0 Biological0
Mechanisms0Associated0With0BDSM0Interactions0in0Dominants0and0Submissives.#J#Sex#
Med,#2020.#17(4):#p.#784-792.#
53.#Wuyts,#E.,#et#al.,#Beyond0 Pain:0 A0 Study0 on0 the0 Variance0 of0 Pain0T hresholds0 Within0
BDSM0Interactions0in0Dominants0and0Submissives.#J#Sex#Med,#2021.#18(3):#p.#556-
564.#
54.#Defrin,# R.,# et# al.,# Attitudes0 and0 emotions0 towards0 pain0 and0 sensitivity0 to0 painful0
stimuli0among0people0routinely0engaging0in0masochistic0behaviour.#Eur#J#Pain,#2015.#
19(9):#p.#1321-30.#
55.# Pollok,#B.,#et#al.,#Differential0effects0of0painful0and0non-painful0stimulation0on0tactile0
processing0in0fibromyalgia0syndrome0and0subjects0with0masochistic0behaviour.#PLoS#
One,#2010.#5(12):#p.#e15804.#
56.#Kamping,#S.,#et#al.,#Contextual0modulation0of0pain0in0masochists:0involvement0of0the0
parietal0operculum0and0insula.#Pain,#2016.#157(2):#p.#445-55.#
57.#Horing,#B.,#C.#Sprenger,#and#C.#Buchel,#The0parietal0operculum0preferentially0encodes0
heat0pain0and0not0salience.#PLoS#Biol,#2019.#17(8):#p.#e3000205.#
58.#Kitada,#R.,#et#al.,#Brain0networks0underlying0tactile0softness0perception:0A0functional0
magnetic0resonance0imaging0study.#Neuroimage,#2019.#197:#p.#156-166.#
59.#Stark,#R.,#et#al.,#Erotic0and0disgust-inducing0pictures--differences0in0the0hemodynamic0
responses0of0the0brain.#Biol#Psychol,#2005.#70(1):#p.#19-29.#
60.#Luo,# S.# and# X.# Zhang,# Empathy0 in0 female0 submissive0 BDSM0 practitioners.#
Neuropsychologia,#2018.#116(Pt#A):#p.#44-51.#
61.#Sur,#S.#and#V.K.#Sinha,#Event-related0potential:0An0overview.#Ind#Psychiatry#J,#2009.#
18(1):#p.#70-3.#
62.#Cheng,#Y.,#et#al.,#Expertise0modulates0the0perception0of0pain0in0others.#Curr#Biol,#2007.#
17(19):#p.#1708-13.#
63.#Waismann,#R.,#et#al.,#EEG0responses0to0visual0erotic0stimuli0in0men0with0normal0and0
paraphilic0interests.#Arch#Sex#Behav,#2003.#32(2):#p.#135-44.#
64.# Ten#Brink,#S.,#et#al.,#The0Psychology0of0Kink:0a0Survey0Study0into0the0Relationships0of0
Trauma0and0Attachment0Style0with0BDSM0Interests.#Sexuality#Research#and#Social#
Policy,#2020.#
65.#Woodhams,#S.G.,#et#al.,#The0role0of0the0endocannabinoid0system0in0pain.#Handb#Exp#
Pharmacol,#2015.#227:#p.#119-43.#
66.#Schuerwegen,# A.,# et# al.,# The0 Psychology0 of0 Kink:0 A0 Cross-Sectional0 Survey0 Study0
Investigating0 the0 Roles0 of0 Sensation0 Seeking0 and0 Coping0 Style0 in0 BDSM-Related0
Interests.#Arch#Sex#Behav,#2020.#
67.#Immonen,# T.,# et# al.,# An0 Ecological0 Conceptualization0 of0 Extreme0 Sports.#Front#
Psychol,#2018.#9:#p.#1274.#
68.#Spence,# C.,# Why0 is0 piquant/spicy0 food0 so0 popular?#International# Journal# of#
Gastronomy#and#Food#Science,#2018.#12:#p.#16-21.#
69.#Duan,#G.,#et#al.,#Effects0of0Spicy0Stimulation0and0Spicy-Food0Consumption0on0Human0
Pain0Sensitivity:0A0Healthy0Volunteer0Study.#J#Pain,#2020.#21(7-8):#p.#848-857.#
70.# Hill,#E.E.,#et#al.,#Exercise0and0circulating0cortisol0levels:0the0intensity0threshold0effect.#
J#Endocrinol#Invest,#2008.#31(7):#p.#587-91.#
71.#Fuss,#J.,#et#al.,#A0runner's0high0depends0on0cannabinoid0receptors0in0mice.#Proc#Natl#
Acad#Sci#U#S#A,#2015.#112(42):#p.#13105-8.#
72.#Martin,#G.N.,#(Why)0Do0You0Like0Scary0Movies?0A0Review0of0the0Empirical0Research0
on0Psychological0Responses0to0Horror0Films.#Front#Psychol,#2019.#10:#p.#2298.#
73.#Gerra,#G.,#et#al.,#Neuroendocrine0responses0to0emotional0arousal0in0normal0women.#
Neuropsychobiology,#1996.#33(4):#p.#173-81.#
74.# Yamamotova,#A.,#et#al.,#Do0multiple0body0modifications0alter0pain0threshold?#Physiol#
Res,#2017.#66(Suppl#4):#p.#S493-S500.#
75.#Paterson,# L.Q.,# R.# Amsel,# and# Y.M.#Binik,# Pleasure0and0pain:0the0 effect0 of0(almost)0
having0an0orgasm0on0genital0and0nongenital0sensitivity.#J#Sex#Med,#2013.#10(6):#p.#
1531-44.#
76.#Rassovsky,#Y.,#et#al.,#Martial0arts0increase0oxytocin0production.#Sci#Rep,#2019.#9(1):#
p.#12980.#
77.#Gil,#M.,#et#al.,#Social0reward:0interactions0with0social0status,0social0communication,0
aggression,0 and0 associated0 neural0 activation0 in0 the0 ventral0 tegmental0 area.#Eur# J#
Neurosci,#2013.#38(2):#p.#2308-18.#
78.#Yashiro,# S.#and# K.# Seki,# Association 0 of0 social0 def eat0 stress-induced0anhedonia-like0
symptoms0with0mGluR1-dependent0decrease0in0membrane-bound0AMPA-GluR10in0the0
mouse0ventral0midbrain.#Stress,#2017.#20(4):#p.#404-418.#
79.#Freeman,#J.B.,#et#al.,#Culture0shapes0a0mesolimbic0response0to0signals0of0dominance0
and0subordination0that0associates0with0behavior.#Neuroimage,#2009.#47(1):#p.#353-
9.#
80.#Jozifkova,# E.# and# M.# Kolackova,# Sexual0 arousal0 by0 dominance0 and0 submission0 in0
relation0 to0 increased0 reproductive0 success0 in0 the0 general0 population.#Neuro#
Endocrinol#Lett,#2017.#38(5):#p.#381-387.#
81.#Jozifkova,# E.,# Consensual0 sadomasochistic0 sex0 (BDSM):0the0roots,0the0 risks,0and0the0
distinctions0between0BDSM0and0violence.#Curr#Psychiatry#Rep,#2013.#15(9):#p.#392.#
82.#Luo,# S.,# et# al.,# The0 oxytocinergic0 system0 modulates0 sadistic0 context-dependent0
empathy0in0humans.#Sci#Rep,#2017.#7(1):#p.#12463.#
83.#Dumais,#K.M.#and# A.H.#Veenema,#Vasopressin0and0oxytocin0receptor0systems0in0the0
brain:0 Sex0 differences0 and0 sex-specific0 regulation0 of0 social0 behavior.#Front#
Neuroendocrinol,#2016.#40:#p.#1-23.#
84.#Martin,# S.M.,# F.# Smith,# and# S.W.# Quirk,# Discriminating0 Coercive0 from0
Sadomasochistic0Sexuality.#Arch#Sex#Behav,#2016.#45(5):#p.#1173-83.#
85.# Cazala,#F.,#et#al.,#Hormonal0response0to0perceived0emotional0distress0in0incarcerated0
men0with0sexual0sadism.#Pers#Individ#Dif,#2022.#184.#
86.#Harenski,#C.L.,#et#al.,#Increased0frontotemporal0activation0during0pain0observation0in0
sexual0sadism:0preliminary0findings.#Arch#Gen#Psychiatry,#2012.#69(3):#p.#283-92.#
87.#Erickson,#J.M.#and#B.J.#Sagarin,#The0prosocial0sadist?0A0comparison0of0BDSM0sadism0
and0everyday0sadism.#Personality#and#Individual#Differences,#2021.#176.#
88.#Joyal,#C.C.,#D.N.#Black,#and#B.#Dassylva,#The0neuropsychology0and0neurology0of0sexual0
deviance:0a0review0and0pilot0study.#Sex#Abuse,#2007.#19(2):#p.#155-73.#
89.# Mokros,#A.,#The0Neuroscience0of0Sexual0Offending,#in#The0Wiley0Blackwell0Handbook0
of0Forensic0Neuroscience,#A.R.#Beech,#et#al.,#Editors.#2018,#John#Wiley#&#Sons#Ltd:#
Hoboken,#USA.#p.#333-358.#
90.#Fedoroff,# J.P.,# Sadism,0 sadomasochism,0 sex,0 and0 violence.#Can# J# Psychiatry,# 2008.#
53(10):#p.#637-46.#
91.#Newmahr,# S.,# Rethinking0 Kink:0 Sadomasochism0 as0 Serious0 Leisure.#Qualitative#
Sociology,#2010.#33:#p.#313-331.#
92.#Gurven,#M.D.#and#D.E.#Lieberman,#WEIRD0bodies:0 mismatch,0medicine0and0missing0
diversity.#Evolution#and#Human#Behavior,#2020.#41(5):#p.#330-340.#
93.#American# Psychiatric# Association# and# American# Psychiatric# Association.# DSM-5#
Task#Force.,#Diagnostic0and0statistical0manual0of0mental0disorders0:0DSM-5.#5th#ed.#
2013,#Washington,#D.C.:#American#Psychiatric#Association.#xliv,#947#p.#
94.# Moser,#C.,#Paraphilias0and0the0ICD-11:0Progress0but0Still0Logically0Inconsistent.#Arch#
Sex#Behav,#2018.#47(4):#p.#825-826.#
95.#Dunkley,#C.R.,#et#al.,#Physical0Pain0as0Pleasure:0A0Theoretical0Perspective.#J#Sex#Res,#
2020.#57(4):#p.#421-437.#
... De Neef et al. (2019) as well as Wuyts and Morrens (2022) have systematically reviewed studies that have uncovered biological processes behind BDSM. Both reviews identified and discussed evidence related to hormonal and neurological workings involved in BDSM practice, mainly during and post-BDSM play. ...
... The researchers suggested that this incongruence between attraction and practice could be a result of the disruptive effects that Toxoplasma can have on dopaminergic pathways in the host's brain, which could reduce the individual's novelty-seeking attributes and thus, translate to less engagement in BDSM activities. Toxoplasmosis is also associated with higher testosterone levels in males (Borráz-León et al., 2021), and while testosterone is implicated in sexual motivations and social dominance, its link to dominance in the BDSM context remains unconfirmed (Wuyts & Morrens, 2022). ...
... Thus, to perpetuate BDSM as pathological, when it is indeed a healthy form of intimacy for many (Wuyts & Morrens, 2022;Wuyts et al., 2020), can have harmful consequences in the therapeutic context. In such cases, it is possible that an erroneous association of kink or sexual fetishism with compulsion is partly to blame. ...
Article
Full-text available
Bondage/discipline, Dominance/submission, and Sadism/Masochism (BDSM) have gained increased attention and discussion in recent years. This prevalence is accompanied by a shift in perceptions of BDSM, including the declassification of sadomasochism as a paraphilic disorder. Evolutionary psychology offers a unique perspective of why some individuals are interested in BDSM and why some prefer certain elements of BDSM over others (e.g., dominance versus submission). In this paper, we examine BDSM from an evolutionary standpoint, examining biopsychosocial factors that underlie the BDSM interests and practice. We articulate this perspective via an exploration of: proximate processes, such as the role of childhood experiences, sexual conditioning, and physiological factors; as well as ultimate explanations for power play and pain play dimensions of BDSM, highlighting the potential adaptive advantages of each. While BDSM may not be adaptive in itself, we examine the literature of sex differences in BDSM role preferences and argue that these preferences may stem from the extreme forms of behaviors which enhance reproductive success. In the realm of pain play, we explore the intersection of pain and pleasure from both physiological and psychological perspectives, highlighting the crucial role of psychological and play partner factors in modulating the experience of pain. Finally, we encourage future research in social sciences to utilize evolutionary frameworks to further explore the subject and help alleviate the mystification surrounding BDSM. This multifaceted exploration of BDSM provides valuable insights for clinicians, kink-identified individuals, and scholars seeking to understand the evolutionary perspectives of human sexual behavior and preferences.
... Wuyts and Morrens [17] conducted a comprehensive review on the biology of kink and found only 10 studies. They summarized that kink appears to be associated with cortisol changes (in submissives), testosterone and oxytocin hormonal changes, and the activation of the parietal operculum and ventral striatum in the pleasure associated with the pleasure and reward center of the brain [17]. ...
... Wuyts and Morrens [17] conducted a comprehensive review on the biology of kink and found only 10 studies. They summarized that kink appears to be associated with cortisol changes (in submissives), testosterone and oxytocin hormonal changes, and the activation of the parietal operculum and ventral striatum in the pleasure associated with the pleasure and reward center of the brain [17]. However, the scant, existing research on the biology of kink is limited by difficulties defining kink (specific inclusion and exclusion criteria), small sample sizes, and lack of social diversity within studies. ...
... To date, there are no genetic studies of people who engage in kink, although the likely presence of sensation-seeking traits warrants empirical biological exploration [17]. Sensation-seeking is defined as the pursuit of varied, novel, complex and intense sensations and experiences, and the willingness to take physical, social, legal and financial risks for the sake of such experiences [18]. ...
Article
The field of kink (or BDSM) studies has grown significantly in recent years, with several areas of study being initiated. This paper summarizes the current state of kink research, including prevalence rates; marginalization and stigma; key biological, psychological, and social research findings; clinical issues; and recommendations for further research. Theoretical frameworks such as minority stress, serious leisure, sexual orientation, personal growth and sensation-seeking theories appear to be useful frameworks outside of approaches that assume psychopathology as an etiological factor. Studies find the following results: higher levels of sensation-seeking; kink activities generating states of flow and transient hypofrontality; notable levels of gender, sexual orientation and relationship style diversity in kink samples; and higher levels of minority-stress related suicidality.
... Neurobiology. For more information about neurobiological findings regarding sexual deviance, we refer to recent reviews (e.g., Krüger & Kneer, 2021;van Kessel et al., 2022;Wuyts & Morrens, 2022). Most neurobiological research regards pedophilia and is hampered by a lack of proper comparison groups. ...
... Nondelinquent participants with pedophilia may display rather normal neurobiology (Krüger & Kneer, 2021;van Kessel et al., 2022). A recent meta-analysis of the biology of BDSM concluded that during BDSM interactions, brain systems regarding reward (for both dominants and submissives) and pain and stress (for submissives) were involved (Wuyts & Morrens, 2022). Yet, their etiological account remains unclear. ...
Article
Not much is known about the etiology, or development, of deviant sexual interests. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a broad overview of current theories on the etiology of sexual deviance. We conducted a systematic search of the databases PubMed and APA PsycInfo (EBSCO). Studies were included when they discussed a theory regarding the etiology or development of sexual deviance. Included studies were assessed on quality criteria for good theories. Common etiological themes were extracted using thematic analysis. We included 47 theories explaining sexual deviance in general as well as various specific deviant sexual interests, such as pedophilia and sadism/masochism. Few theories ( k = 7) were of acceptable quality as suggested by our systematic assessment of quality criteria for good theories (QUACGOT). These theories indicated that deviant sexual interests may develop as the result of an interplay of various factors: excitation transfer between emotions and sexual arousal, conditioning, problems with “normative” sexuality, and social learning. Neurobiological findings could not be included as no acceptable quality neurobiological theories could be retrieved. The important roles of excitation transfer and conditioning designate that dynamic, changeable processes take part in the etiology of sexual deviance. These same processes could potentially be deployed to diminish unwanted deviant sexual interests.
... In the context of BDSM interactions, Wismeijer and Van Assen (2013) Additional roles are defined within BDSM practices, complementing the above (Wuyts & Morrens, 2021;Niebudek & Iniewicz, 2023): ...
Preprint
Full-text available
This paper argues that trauma play—a subset of BDSM practices intentionally designed to mirror elements of past trauma, such as restraints, impact play, and power dynamics—offers a unique framework for trauma processing among individuals with trauma histories. In contrast to retraumatization, where suffering is merely re-experienced, trauma play allows participants to engage with past traumas from a place of agency, control, and, crucially, pleasure. This paper explores whether pleasure derived from trauma play can recontextualize negative memories and support psychological recovery, potentially leading to post-traumatic growth and enhanced courage. Drawing from retrospective data, this study examines the correlation between pleasure intensity during trauma play and its impact on psychological resilience. The findings seek to contribute new insights to the sparse empirical literature on BDSM's potential for therapeutic transformation, targeting professionals and researchers exploring unconventional paths to healing.
... This relationship underscores the intricate connection between tickle fetishism and BDSM, contributing to the complexity of tickling experiences within the broader framework of sexual behavior. Despite valuable insights into the biology of BDSM, including brain activation and hormonal changes (Wuyts and Morrens, 2021), existing literature lacks a comprehensive understanding on tickle fetishism. Tickling fetishism shows an overlap with other fetishes, including foot fetishism (podophilia), suggesting potential connections between these various sexual preferences (Provine, 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
Tickling is commonly perceived as juvenile play associated with laughter. However, its potential connection to adult sexual behavior has largely remained unexplored. Our online survey, primarily distributed among individuals interested in tickle fetishism, explored tickling and its association with sexual behavior. Ticklishness types, tools, preferred body parts, and partner preferences, were examined. Results revealed diverse patterns of ticklishness changes over time and distinct body-part preferences for different types of tickling. Childhood experiences and exposure to tickling content in television were found to shape individuals’ affinity for tickle fetishism. A quarter of respondents reported experiencing orgasms exclusively from tickling, while around 88% expressed sexual satisfaction through tickling alone, indicating its sufficiency as a sexual stimulus among fetishists. Tickling desire decreased after orgasm, indicating an association between tickling and sexual activity. Moreover, ticklishness degree predicted preferences for being tickled rather than tickling others. Exploratory factor analysis identified three factors underlying tickling and sexual experiences: enjoyment and frequency of tickling during sexual activity; preference for intense sexual experiences; age of becoming sexually active. In conclusion, this study provides unique insights into tickling and its connections to sexual context, enhancing our understanding of diverse human sexual behavior and tickle fetishism as a distinct preference.
... Dicha estrategia tiene por finalidad señalar determinar cuál es el estado o situación de un conjunto de estudios sobre un tópico determinado (Snyder, 2019). Se trata de un recurso actualmente empleado en diversas áreas del conocimiento (Calzolari et al., 2022;Mariani et al., 2022;Mergoni & De Witte, 2022;Pocinho et al., 2022;Wuyts & Morrens, 2022). Como método de investigación, una RSL cumple diversos objetivos: diferenciar el trabajo realizado del que falta realizar, identificar variables importantes, sintetizar un conjunto de estudios sobre problemas específicos, identificar conexiones entre estudios de un mismo campo, identificar los métodos y técnicas más utilizados o contextualizar un grupo diverso de investigaciones, entre otros fines académicos (Hart, 1998). ...
Thesis
Full-text available
"Por un lado, la presente tesis cumple un objetivo principal: analizar la influencia de la cultura en la evolución humana según la THD [teoría de la herencia dual]. Para ello, cumple tres objetivos secundarios: a) analizar su estructura conceptual; b) explorar sus campos de aplicación; y c) discutir sus debates con otras propuestas." / "On the one hand, this thesis fulfills a main objective: to analyze the influence of culture on human evolution according to the DIT [dual inheritance theory]. For this, it fulfills three secondary objectives: a) analyze its conceptual structure; b ) explore their fields of application, and c) discuss their debates with other proposals."
Article
As the field of BDSM studies continues to develop, further research is needed that explores the wide range of internal diversity within the BDSM population. Part of this diversity results from differences between BDSM participants in terms of their BDSM role preferences. Switches are a category of BDSM participants who take on both dominant-type and submissive-type BDSM roles. Although switches comprise a substantial part of the BDSM population they have been largely overlooked within academic research. This article involves 15 in-depth interviews with self-identified switches. It uses constructivist grounded theory to analyse what being a switch means to switches and the factors that switches consider when deciding which BDSM role to take on at a particular time. This analysis generates a complex account of BDSM switches that conceptualises how switches are open to diverse BDSM activities/roles, connect switching to their sense of self, experience varying limitations on their role flexibility, and play differently when engaging with fellow switches. This analysis also generates a theoretical model that explains how switches make situational role choices.
Article
Kink, often referred to as BDSM, is an important aspect of a sizable minority's sexual desires, practices, and personal relationships, yet there are few ways to assess kink engagement in a holistic manner. This study aimed to develop the Kink Orientation Scale (KOS), a novel short tool for measuring different aspects of kink sexuality. In phase one, 27 items were created and included in the initial scale based on a literature review and focus groups with kinky and non-kinky individuals. In phase two, the KOS was administered to 200 university students. Exploratory Factor Analyses (EFA) were used to determine the factor structure and dimensionality of the KOS, and we retained 18 items in the scale and identified five factors. In phase three, the 18 item KOS was administered to a kink sample of 1025 participants as a form of validation. Confirmatory Factor Analyses also identified five factors with a strong overlap to the EFA. The five factors were: kink identity; kink community; kink paraphernalia; kink practices; and sexual communication. The kink sample also provided higher scores on the KOS compared with the non-kink sample. This study shows the potential utility of the KOS in measuring kink engagement holistically.
Article
Full-text available
BDSM is a widespread and highly prevalent yet stigmatized practice of intimacy and sexuality. In recent years, international interest in BDSM research has grown, mainly resulting in prevalence studies in various countries. Yet, no research has, thus far, investigated international and intercontinental differences in the nature of BDSM interests and fantasies, BDSM roles and practicing contexts among BDSM practitioners. In order to explore international discrepancies in BDSM identity, fantasies, and activities among self-identified BDSM practitioners in an international survey, a group of FetLife (a social network website for BDSM and kink interested individuals) members (N = 1,112) originating from North America (n = 458), Europe (n = 566), Oceania (n = 46), and Other (n = 42) completed the survey. Europeans reported an earlier age of onset of fantasizing about BDSM than did North Americans. More North Americans indicated practicing BDSM in a public context than did Europeans and Oceanians. These differences could in part be explained by different cultural backgrounds, higher levels of religiosity, and current stigmas towards non-traditional sexual interests. Future research should focus on clarifying whether cultural mechanisms underlie these dissimilarities.
Article
Full-text available
Sexual sadists derive pleasure from humiliation, domination and infliction of pain on victims. They display increased penile arousal and activation of brain regions involved in sexual arousal and emotional states when viewing stimuli depicting individuals in physical distress. Neuroactive hormones modulate these regions, but it is unknown if sexual sadists also have endocrine responses to depictions of individuals in distress. The present study examined endocrine responses, elicited by viewing a video depicting an individual in extreme emotional distress, in incarcerated adult male sexual offenders (n = 23) with varying levels of sadistic traits. Sadism, was measured by the Severe Sexual Sadism Scale (SeSaS). Testosterone (T), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and oxytocin (OT) were assayed before and after participants watched a video depicting an individual in emotional distress. T responses to the video were significantly and positively associated with SeSaS scores. There were no significant associations between sexual sadism and OT or ACTH. Our findings provide physiological evidence of atypical processing of distress cues in sadism consistent with the role of testosterone in sexual arousal and aggressive behaviors. These findings have implications for the evaluation and treatment of sexual sadists.
Article
Full-text available
Background BDSM is an acronym describing bondage & discipline, dominance & submission and sadism & masochism. Afflicting or receiving pain is usually an important part of the BDSM interaction. Aim This research will focus on better understanding the aspect of pain within a BDSM interaction. Methods Submissive and dominant counterparts of 35 couples were recruited to participate in a BDSM interaction, of which 34 dominants and 33 submissives were included in analyses. A non-BDSM interested control group (n=27) was included to control for social interaction, of which 24 were included in analyses. Outcomes This research investigates the differences in 1) baseline pain thresholds, 2) the impact of a BDSM interaction on those thresholds and 3) threshold moderating factors like pain cognition between submissive and dominant BDSM participants and control individuals. Results BDSM practitioners have a higher pain threshold overall and a BSDM interaction will result in a temporary elevation of pain thresholds for submissives. Additionally, pain thresholds in dominants will be dependent upon their fear of pain and tendency to catastrophize pain and submissives will experience less fear of pain than the control group. Clinical Implications By further enhancing our understanding of the mechanisms behind a BDSM interaction in this way, we aspire to relieve the stigma these practitioners still endure. Strengths & Limitations This is one of the first studies of its kind with a large sample size compared to similar research, which makes it a significant contribution to the field. It must be mentioned that there is a possible selection bias because recruitment was only done through the Flemish BDSM community and specifically those who visit clubs. Additionally, pain threshold remains a subjective measurement, which must be taken into account. Conclusion This study helps shed further light on the biological processes behind a BDSM interaction through pain threshold measurements.
Article
Full-text available
Despite the gaining popularity in mainstream media of the phenomenon that is BDSM, empirical research on the motives and underlying psychological mechanisms driving BDSM practitioners is scarce. The current study focused on the potential driving roles of sensation seeking and coping styles in BDSM-related interests and behavior. A cross-sectional survey questionnaire was completed by 256 Dutch-speaking BDSM practitioners (110 men, 135 women, 7 gender fluid, 2 genderless, 1 other not specified), 1 missing (this participant did not answer the question regarding gender, but did answer all other survey items) and a matched control group lacking any BDSM interest recruited from the general Belgian population (N = 300; 135 men, 158 women, 4 gender fluid, 3 genderless). The questionnaire consisted of several items surveying different BDSM identities and interest levels of BDSM-related activities, an adapted version of the Dutch Sensation Seeking Scale, and items querying seven coping styles. Compared to controls, BDSM practitioners reported significantly higher levels of sensation seeking for all dimensions (experience seeking, thrill seeking, and distraction seeking), as well as the use of more active coping skills such as problem solving and taking action. Gender differentiated which specific coping skills were being used with women seeking out more emotional support and comfort and reaching out more for help and advice in both the BDSM and control group, and men taking more action and seeking distraction in leisure. About 40% of the practitioners reported using BDSM itself as a coping strategy. Further research is needed to explore the link between coping and sexuality in general, and to other psychological processes that drive BDSM interests in order to destigmatize and normalize consensual BDSM-related activities within the general population.
Article
Full-text available
IntroductionBDSM is a prevalent type of sexual expression that refers to Bondage and Discipline (BD), Dominance and Submission (DS), and Sadism and Masochism (SM). It has been speculated that a substantial percentage of BDSM practitioners have experienced (sexual) trauma in the past. Attachment style is an additional factor resulting from early life dynamics that has been suggested to potentially influence BDSM interests. This study will investigate to what extent BDSM interests are related to trauma and attachment style, while differentiating between BDSM community practitioners and private practitioners.MethodsA group of 771 BDSM practitioners and 518 non-practitioners from the general population completed a survey in 2017 assessing BDSM interests as well as the Brief Trauma Questionnaire to gauge traumatic events and the Relationships Questionnaire to assess attachment style.ResultsCommunity BDSM practitioners and private practitioners reported higher levels of physical abuse in adulthood but no significant differences emerged for other traumatic experiences including childhood physical abuse or unwanted sexual trauma. Surprisingly, BDSM practitioners had more secure and at the same time more anxious-preoccupied attachment styles compared to non-practitioners. Besides, secure attachment style was associated with dominance, whereas the anxious-avoidant attachment style was associated with submissiveness. Intensity of BDSM interest was predicted by secure attachment style, gender, sexual orientation, and living area.Conclusions Thus, our findings do not support the hypothesis of BDSM being a maladaptive coping mechanism in response to early life dynamics.Policy ImplicationsBDSM practices deserve perception as normal sexual practice free from stigmatization rather than deviant behavior.
Article
Full-text available
Background BDSM is an abbreviation used to reference the concepts of bondage and discipline, dominance and submission, sadism and masochism, enacted by power exchanges between consensual partners. Although pain is an evolutionary protection mechanism to prevent individuals from further exposing themselves to damage, afflicting or receiving pain is a core element of BDSM play. Aim To shed light upon the rewarding biological mechanisms associated with BDSM interactions. Methods Dominant and submissive counterparts of 35 BDSM couples were recruited through Fetlife, a BDSM-themed internet forum, and by word-of-mouth within the Belgian BDSM community. In order to control for social evening interaction effects, non-BDSM interested controls (n=27) were recruited at the bar of a local sports club and by word-of-mouth. Main outcome measures We compared the evolution of the stress and reward hormone levels of cortisol, beta-endorphins and endocannabinoids (2AG and AEA) in a group of BDSM practitioners before and after an active BDSM interaction with the levels in control individuals. Results We showed that submissives showed increases in cortisol levels due to BDSM interactions. Endocannabinoid levels in submissives increased during the play compared to the control group, but no such increase was observed in dominants. However, when taking play type into account, dominants showed a significant increase in endocannabinoids associated with power play but not with pain play. Conclusion Even though this is one of the first studies of its kind, we can conclude that there is a clear indication for increased pleasure in submissives when looking at biological effects of a BDSM interaction, which was related to the increases in experienced stress.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose of Review Coercive sexual sadism can be distinguished from consensual BDSM (bondage discipline/dominance submission/sadism masochism) role-play and from everyday sadism, a personality trait. The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic qualitative review of the pertinent literature on coercive sexual sadism from the last three years. Recent Findings Clinical assessment of sexual sadism can be made more objective through behavioral checklists based on crime scene actions. The latent structure of sexual sadism is likely dimensional, placing the disorder at the upper end of a continuum of sexually aggressive behavior. Sexual sadism does not seem to increase the risk of violent offense recidivism (including sexual contact offenses) above and beyond the risk implied by established risk factors of delinquency. Summary Coercive sexual sadism denotes a disposition for sexually aggressive behavior. Whether this disposition is put into practice is likely due to other trait and state variables. Treatment studies are completely lacking in the recent literature.
Article
Full-text available
Spicy-food intake has been shown to affect various human physiological systems and diseases. This study tested the analgesia effect caused by stimulation of a spicy sensation (spicy stimulation) and explored the effect of spicy-food consumption on human basal pain sensitivity. A total of 60 healthy undergraduates were included in the primary study. Placebo and sweet stimulation were used as reference interventions. Pressure and cold-pain thresholds were measured before and after taste stimulation. The frequency of spicy-food intake was also evaluated. An additional 100 subjects were recruited to validate the results. Compared to placebo stimulation, both pressure and cold-pain thresholds increased during spicy stimulation (P < .05). The increased thresholds remained, even when the taste stimulation residue was nearly eliminated (P < .05). The pressure (10.0 [2.1] vs 12.7 [3.0] kg/cm2, P < .001) and cold-pain (4.4 [1.6] vs 6.2 [2.7] seconds, P = .003) thresholds in subjects who consume spicy food ≥3 days/week were significantly lower than in those who consume it <3 days/week. In the validation population, the frequency of spicy-food intake was negatively associated with subjects’ pressure (β = −.218, P = .013) and cold-pain (β = −.205, P = .035) thresholds. Spicy stimulation has an analgesia effect on adults that persists even after the taste stimulation stops. Conversely, a long-term spicy diet can reduce the human basal pain threshold. Trial Registration The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, People's Liberation Army (identification No., 2017-023-01), and it was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at www.chictr.org.cn (No. ChiCTR1800015053). Perspective This study directly examined the effects of stimulation of a spicy sensation on adult pain sensitivity and was the first to explore the relationship between long-term spicy-food intake and human pain sensitivity. The results provide evidence for future clinical pain intervention and individualized pain treatment.
Article
Full-text available
Why do we watch and like horror films? Despite a century of horror film making and entertainment, little research has examined the human motivation to watch fictional horror and how horror film influences individuals’ behavioral, cognitive, and emotional responses. This review provides the first synthesis of the empirical literature on the psychology of horror film using multi-disciplinary research from psychology, psychotherapy, communication studies, development studies, clinical psychology, and media studies. The paper considers the motivations for people’s decision to watch horror, why people enjoy horror, how individual differences influence responses to, and preference for, horror film, how exposure to horror film changes behavior, how horror film is designed to achieve its effects, why we fear and why we fear specific classes of stimuli, and how liking for horror develops during childhood and adolescence. The literature suggests that (1) low empathy and fearfulness are associated with more enjoyment and desire to watch horror film but that specific dimensions of empathy are better predictors of people’s responses than are others; (2) there is a positive relationship between sensation-seeking and horror enjoyment/preference, but this relationship is not consistent; (3) men and boys prefer to watch, enjoy, and seek our horror more than do women and girls; (4) women are more prone to disgust sensitivity or anxiety than are men, and this may mediate the sex difference in the enjoyment of horror; (5) younger children are afraid of symbolic stimuli, whereas older children become afraid of concrete or realistic stimuli; and (6) in terms of coping with horror, physical coping strategies are more successful in younger children; priming with information about the feared object reduces fear and increases children’s enjoyment of frightening television and film. A number of limitations in the literature is identified, including the multifarious range of horror stimuli used in studies, disparities in methods, small sample sizes, and a lack of research on cross-cultural differences and similarities. Ideas for future research are explored.
Article
Research has begun to investigate subclinical levels of sadism including “everyday sadism:” an enjoyment of cruelty in normal, everyday situations. Thus far, subclinical sadism has been conceptualized as inherently antisocial, as with Internet trolls. We examined a potentially prosocial manifestation of sadism: self-identified sadists in the BDSM (bondage/discipline, dominance/submission, and sadism/masochism) community who cause pain only to consenting partners. A total of 532 BDSM practitioners and non-practitioners completed measures of everyday sadism with consent explicit, non-consent explicit, or consent ambiguous, and known correlates of everyday sadism (empathy, HEXACO traits, and Dark Triad traits). Across both samples and all conditions, everyday sadism correlated negatively with affective empathy, agreeableness, and honesty-humility, and positively with Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism. These results support the validity of the measure of everyday sadism among BDSM practitioners. Psychopathy uniquely predicted everyday sadism among BDSM practitioners when non-consent was explicit. BDSM sadists differed significantly from non-sadistic BDSM tops only on the physical subscale of everyday sadism and only when consent was explicit. These findings suggest that most BDSM sadists are not everyday sadists, and that BDSM sadism might represent a prosocial manifestation of subclinical sadism, but that BDSM sadists with high levels of psychopathy might be everyday sadists.
Article
Despite recent rapid advances in medical knowledge that have improved survival, conventional medical science's understanding of human health and disease relies heavily on people of European descent living in contemporary urban industrialized environments. Given that modern conditions in high-income countries differ widely in terms of lifestyle and exposures compared to those experienced by billions of people and all our ancestors over several hundred thousand years, this narrow approach to the human body and health is very limiting. We argue that preventing and treating chronic diseases of aging and other mismatch diseases will require both expanding study design to sample diverse populations and contexts, and fully incorporating evolutionary perspectives. In this paper, we first assess the extent of biased representation of industrialized populations in high profile, international biomedical journals, then compare patterns of morbidity and health across world regions. We also compare demographic rates and the force of selection between subsistence and industrialized populations to reflect on the changes in how selection operates on fertility and survivorship across the lifespan. We argue that, contrary to simplistic misguided solutions like the PaleoDiet, the hypothesis of evolutionary mismatch needs critical consideration of population history, evolutionary biology and evolved reaction norms to prevent and treat diseases. We highlight the critical value of broader sampling by considering the effects of three key exposures that have radically changed over the past century in many parts of the world—pathogen burden, reproductive effort and physical activity—on autoimmune, cardiometabolic and other mismatch diseases.