ArticlePublisher preview available

Mobilizing After Corporate Environmental Irresponsibility in a Community of Place: A Framing Microprocess Perspective

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

In this paper, we take a framing perspective to corporate environmental irresponsibility and focus it on the community of place as one among the most affected, yet rarely examined, stakeholders. In particular, we take a framing microprocess perspective, to study how interactions within a community of place affect a mobilization after corporate environmental irresponsibility. We elicit two framing microprocess, losses display and scale augmentation, and show how they significantly, though differently, affect a mobilization. In so doing, we enrich our understanding of how communities of place mobilize, the types of, and venues, where interactions take place in a community of place—and how these affect a mobilization.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Journal of Business Ethics (2023) 182:1155–1169
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04983-1
ORIGINAL PAPER
Mobilizing After Corporate Environmental Irresponsibility
inaCommunity ofPlace: AFraming Microprocess Perspective
ValeriaCavotta1· GuidoPalazzo2· AntoninoVaccaro3
Received: 30 November 2020 / Accepted: 21 October 2021 / Published online: 3 November 2021
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021
Abstract
In this paper, we take a framing perspective to corporate environmental irresponsibility and focus it on the community of
place as one among the most affected, yet rarely examined, stakeholders. In particular, we take a framing microprocess
perspective, to study how interactions within a community of place affect a mobilization after corporate environmental irre-
sponsibility. We elicit two framing microprocess, losses display and scale augmentation, and show how they significantly,
though differently, affect a mobilization. In so doing, we enrich our understanding of how communities of place mobilize,
the types of, and venues, where interactions take place in a community of place—and how these affect a mobilization.
Keywords Community of place· Framing microprocesses· Corporate environmental irresponsibility· Industrial waste
hazardous disposal
Introduction
Corporate irresponsibility is seen as entailing a decision
that involves a gain by one party at the expense of the total
system (Armstrong, 1977). When it refers to the environ-
ment, corporate irresponsibility encompasses a variety of
detrimental activities such as environmental frauds (e.g.,
Volkswagen scandal), depletion or destruction of natural
resources, and hazardous disposal of industrial waste. Over-
all, extant research on corporate irresponsibility has
advanced our understandings on antecedents (Chen etal.,
2008; Greve etal., 2010), attributions of irresponsibility
(Lange & Washburn, 2012), reactions to irresponsibility,
and firms’ coping measures vis-à-vis relevant stakeholders
(Antonetti & Maklan, 2016; Miceli etal., 2012; Nadeem,
2021; Pfarrer etal., 2008; Siltaouja & Vehkaperä, 2010).
A framing perspective in cases of corporate environmen-
tal irresponsibility has been used, typically, to explain how
firms, the media, and other organizations such as non-profits
(NGOs) and social movements (SMOs), construct firms’
irresponsibility by rendering some aspects of a particular
phenomenon more salient than others (Allan & Hadden,
2017; Clemente & Gabbioneta, 2017; Nyberg etal., 2020).
Though cases of corporate environmental irresponsibility are
detrimental in general, and also bear severe consequences for
the irresponsible firms (Xu etal., 2021), the communities of
place (Dunham etal., 2006), i.e., the geographic communi-
ties living near the premises where the environmental dam-
age has occurred, will be among the most affected (Beamish,
2001; Scott etal., 2012). For instance, in the years spent
studying communities contaminated with toxic substances,
Edelstein (1989) reported a host of negative, long-lasting,
environmental, social, psychological, and economic conse-
quences for the communities. These ranged from: fear of
imminent diseases and cross-generational effects, distrust
Editors at the Journal of Business Ethics are recused from all
decisions relating to submissions with which there is any identified
potential conflict of interest. Submissions to the Journal of
Business Ethics from editors of the journal are handled by a senior
independent editor at the journal and subject to full double blind
peer review processes.
* Valeria Cavotta
valeria.cavotta@unibz.it
Guido Palazzo
guido.palazzo@unil.ch
Antonino Vaccaro
avaccaro@iese.edu
1 Free University ofBozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 1,
39100Bolzano, Italy
2 University ofLausanne, Unil Dorigny, 1015Lausanne,
Switzerland
3 IESE Business School, Carrer d’Arnús i de Garí, 3,
08034Barcelona, Spain
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... We particularly investigate crimes perpetrated by the Camorra, the Neapolitan Mafia, 1 at the expense of farming communities in the metropolitan area of Naples and Caserta, in Italy. In this area, also described as the Land of Fires 2 (D' Alisa et al. 2017;Berruti and Palestino 2020), waste has been illegally landfilled and burnt in peri-urban farmlands, abandoned industrial estates, and mining sites, for more than 40 years (Iengo and Armiero 2017;Cavotta et al. 2021;Panico et al. 2022). Farmers located in this area have mobilized collectively mostly in reaction to a prolonged market crisis, while initially struggling against contrasting practices of land exploitation, illegal burning or dumping, and more 1 The Neapolitan Mafia is also known as Camorra. ...
... Exposing conflicts, and conflictual place frames, as the pivotal dimension to investigate and conceptualize place-making, is particularly relevant in contexts where actors are immersed in socioecological struggles. These are places often examined from a perspective of ecological struggles and environmental justice (Scheidel et al. 2018(Scheidel et al. , 2020, place-based stigma (Malatzky and Couch 2023;Schneider 2017), and more recently through relations of extreme precarity and exploitation (Courpasson et al. 2017;Hultin et al. 2021), diffused violence and environmental crimes (Vaccaro and Palazzo 2015;Cavotta et al. 2021). Particularly, there is increasing evidence that environmental crimes, for example through extractivism (Ehrnström-Fuentes 2022; Ehrnström-Fuentes and Böhm 2023) or by establishing waste economies, are perpetrated by those involved in organized crime (D'Alisa et al. 2010;Armiero and D'Alisa 2013) and too often supported by private businesses, and tolerated by the state (Ehrnström-Fuentes and Kröger 2018; Bӧhm and Pascucci 2020). ...
... Particularly, we add to the extant literature the role of violence, exploitation, and silencing as key to understanding how social actors, like farmers, collectively create, take, make, or shape their place-frames. Second, our analysis refines our understanding of how social actors shape spatial-temporal relations in the context of conflicts marked by violence and extreme precarity (Vaccaro and Palazzo 2015;Cavotta et al. 2021). From this perspective, our study contributes to existing knowledge aimed at unpacking relational place-making in contexts of socio-ecological crises, enriching the extant literature on environmental justice, and for example engaging with the notion of ecological distribution conflicts to explain contentious human-nature relations in contexts of extractivism (Ehrnström-Fuentes 2022; Ehrnström-Fuentes and Böhm 2023), illegal waste, and dumping (Scheidel et al. 2018(Scheidel et al. , 2020. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates how farmers develop place-based relations when subject to structural conditions of violence and environmental crime. We particularly focus on environmental crimes perpetrated by the Camorra, the Neapolitan Mafia, at the expense of farming communities in the metropolitan areas of Naples and Caserta, in Italy. Farmers located in this area have struggled to mobilize collectively, with only a group of farmers enable to re-act to land exploitation, illegal burning or dumping, and more in general to the waste crisis. Stimulated by this rather puzzling empirical evidence, our research team engaged in a deeper investigation of the waste crisis, exploring how farmers located in the Land of Fires reacted to conditions of violence and environmental crime by developing a differentiated set of place-based narratives and practices. Using the Land of Fires and the waste crisis as an empirical context, in this study we focus particularly on conceptualizing place-based processes emerging in the context of organized violence and environmental crime. In our approach, these are structural conditions produced by the Camorra and the state, to which local agencies, such as farmers, respond.
... Places are constantly reproduced through interpretations and meanings and are therefore, relational and overlapping (Beyes & Steyaert, 2012). Places can be part of the web of life (Ehrnström-Fuentes, 2022); they can provide meanings and mobilisation for individuals (Jones et al., 2019) and communities (Cavotta et al., 2021), and they ground organisational resilience (Kim et al., 2019). Places are often understood by the materiality of the physical world interacting with the individual or organisation. ...
... The paper contributes to the literature on corporate-community relations by explaining through the concept of place-basedness the different positionalities in those relations, and the dynamics and different degrees of resistance in a place. This paper also offers new insights for the business ethics literature on social embeddedness (Cavotta et al., 2021;D'Cruz et al., 2021;Kim et al., 2019;Lähdesmäki et al., 2017) by illustrating how social webs in local communities may constrain some resistance. ...
... families, more distant kin, and physical proximity (Lähdesmäki et al., 2017), and the social 'stickiness' surrounding them presents a hindrance to speaking out. Previous research has often highlighted how social embeddedness offers a power resource for those who are vulnerable or in less advantageous positions (Amato et al., 2021;Cavotta et al., 2021;D'Cruz et al., 2021;Kim et al., 2019). However, social embeddedness can also silence certain actors in corporate-community engagement, especially in relatively small places. ...
Article
Full-text available
This article examines how place and place-basedness are essential to understanding the conflict dynamics of natural resource use. Based on a single case study and using an ethnographic approach to examine a place, the paper unearths how place is mobilised in corporate–community relations. This study defines place-basedness as having two relational elements: ecological and social embeddedness. It finds four positions with differing place identifications, meanings, and relationships with the ecological and social place. This article concludes that while ecological embeddedness enhances the ability to resist natural resource use through knowledge attribution and actively mobilising a place, the social embeddedness of some positions constrains local people’s ability to resist. It also identifies attachment to and detachment from place as two aspects of a central mechanism whereby countering positions are mobilised in the hegemonic struggle. The findings contribute to our understanding of place as a constituting part of corporate–community relations and place-basedness both as a resource for and hindrance to resistance.
... However, what the LoF defines is a wider human and economic geography of continued socio-ecological and political struggles, due to the presence of an illegal and violent regime (D'Alisa et al., 2010;D'Alisa et al., 2017). This regime emerged in the general void of legality and accountability of the public authorities and private businesses in charge of managing waste (Iengo and Armiero, 2017;Cavotta et al., 2021), and more in general the absence of the (Italian) state in 'regulating' violence in this region (Armiero and D'Alisa, 2013;Berruti and Palestino, 2020). This crisis also reflects the complexity and ambiguity of institutional dynamics beyond this specific geography, where the expansion of so-called market economies generates illegal political, economic and social practices, with which they have deeply intertwined over time (D'Alisa et al., 2017). ...
... Mimicking practices of necro-capitalism, these organizations thrive by dispossession and the subjugation of life to the power of death (Banerjee, 2008). Organized crime manages or protects illegal businesses such as drugs (Sandberg, 2012) or arms trafficking (Raab and Milward, 2003), but also infiltrates legal economies, creating partnerships and alliances with state representatives and private businesses (Vaccaro and Palazzo, 2015;Cavotta et al., 2021). Organized crime operates in markets such as toxic-waste processing, construction, renewable energies, banking, agriculture and sometimes control significant portions of these markets (Cavotta et al., 2021). ...
... Organized crime manages or protects illegal businesses such as drugs (Sandberg, 2012) or arms trafficking (Raab and Milward, 2003), but also infiltrates legal economies, creating partnerships and alliances with state representatives and private businesses (Vaccaro and Palazzo, 2015;Cavotta et al., 2021). Organized crime operates in markets such as toxic-waste processing, construction, renewable energies, banking, agriculture and sometimes control significant portions of these markets (Cavotta et al., 2021). These are (illegal) market economies that develop in parallel to legal ones. ...
Chapter
Against the background of the global COVID-19 pandemic, this chapter presents an in-depth vision of the relationship between music-making and the domestic life of Portuguese artists. The chapter presents and discusses data from an international project related to the Portuguese reality. Then, on the basis of some 40 semi-structured interviews with Portuguese musicians, the author reflects on the impacts of the pandemic on their musical careers and potential impacts on music-making processes more generally, as well as on family and domestic life. Finally, the chapter highlights the scarcity of this kind of research in the Portuguese reality, making it imperative that other dimensions of music-making and artists' lives are explored and made perceptible, not just the economic losses suffered.
... Therefore, the focus is not only on the effects of organizational actions but also on the attributions of different audiences regarding the firm's irresponsibility (Bundy & Pfarrer, 2015;He et al., 2021;Lange & Washburn, 2012). Much of the recent work in this area has focused on the perceptions of different audiences in the wake of social irresponsibility, including employees (Hericher & Bridoux, 2023), consumers (Valor et al., 2022;Yue et al., 2023) and local communities (Cavotta et al., 2023). In these studies, CSiR is treated as a process of social evaluation (Bitektine, 2011) rather than an "objective" phenomenon. ...
... We first contribute to the literature on CSiR. While prior work in this area has admittedly incorporated variation among "observers" in terms of how they develop attributions of irresponsibility, such variation has largely been limited to differences in social identification with the firm or with affected parties (Antonetti & Maklan, 2016;Bundy & Pfarrer, 2015;Lange & Washburn, 2012); recent work has, for instance, focused on particular groups, including employees (Hericher & Bridoux, 2023), consumers (Valor et al., 2022;Yue et al., 2023) and local communities (Cavotta et al., 2023), and how they punish firms that are seen as irresponsible. However, these groups also feature heterogeneity in terms of what acts are seen as irresponsible, perceptions that are distinct from their social identification with the firm. ...
... Other examples of parasites include counterfeiters of luxury products (Hietanen, Murray, Sihvonen, & Tikkanen, 2020), rogue waste treatment companies (Cavotta, Palazzo, & Vaccaro, 2021), predatory journals and publishers (Dobusch & Heimstädt, 2019), accountancy firms that falsify accounts (e.g., Enron and Arthur Andersen), and auditors that produce questionable audits (Sikka et al., 2018). In all these examples, we see a group of actors engaging in deviant activity in a way that undermines the institution their existence depends on. ...
... A student may have someone (or something) write a course essay or a dissertation for them (Lindebaum & Ramirez, 2023). A company may present falsified certificates to clients that suggest it offers toxic waste treatment services but burns the waste instead (Cavotta et al., 2021). Both are examples of institutional parasites engaging in decoupling: the student presents a symbol, the essay, supposedly representing their underlying knowledge. ...
... This helps explain why some residents immediately associate the image of the WTE incineration plant with an open-burning garbage mountain, even though they had not heard of it before. Moreover, scholars have indicated that during framing, different groups including environmentalists, residents, project participants, and governments often engage in frame contests to contend for a dominant interpretation (Liersch and Stegmaier, 2022), which may distort the original intention of local resistance (Cavotta et al., 2023). ...
... By investigating a revelatory case, we have developed a grounded model of framing (see Fig. 2) that illustrates how a NIMBY frame gets displaced by a PIMBY frame during the ongoing interaction among project participants, authorities, and residents. The model extends the conventionally conflict-laden perspective of NIMBY framing against energy projects (Cavotta et al., 2023;Herrero and Vilella, 2018), as it not only incorporates residents' initial resistance but also unfolds how this resistance was dissipated and eventually reversed. ...
... More importantly, it allows us to shift the attention to the communities themselves and how they understand and engage with the rights and wrongs propagated by organizations. Recognizing the perspective of these communities is crucial, as they play a pivotal role in shaping the social perceptions and evaluations of a company (Cavotta, Palazzo, & Vaccaro, 2023). Although studies have looked at social evaluations such as legitimacy (S. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
We advance a new approach focused on the intergenerational reciprocity of corporate action. Our perspective differs from existing perspectives on social responsibility and irresponsibility in three major aspects. First, we argue that instead of a sharp divide between historical and contemporary (ir)responsibility events, greater attention should be given to intergenerational processes connecting past, present, and future. Second, we urge scholars to look beyond focal organizations and how they engage in wrongdoing and prosocial behaviours to observe networks of organizations and their sustained involvement with stakeholder communities. Third, we call for the recognition of intergenerational ethics that adopt the perspective of stakeholder communities and acknowledge that corporations are responsible not only for what they did and left undone but also for how they engage with the past in the present. Several possibilities for future research ensue, including a deeper exploration of the intergenerational dynamics of blaming and corporate accountability across time.
... At a global level, few scholars have focused on the relationship between CEIR, CD, and financial performance (Dempsey-Brench & Shantz, 2022). As environmental and tax regulations in developed countries (e.g., EU and US) are relatively robust, research conducted in these regions primarily focuses on how firms can enhance their performance and value by fulfilling environmental responsibilities and engaging in CD (Ahmad et al., 2023;Cavotta et al., 2021;Cha & Rajadhyaksha, 2021). While, in many economically underdeveloped regions (e.g., Africa), environmentally non-compliant firms engage in CD merely to conceal their environmentally unfriendly behavior and mitigate the negative consequences of CEIR (Yusuf & Omoteso, 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study examines the practices of listed firms in heavily polluting industries in China and their approaches to corporate social responsibility. Specifically, it explores the relationship between corporate environmental irresponsibility (CEIR), charitable donations (CD), and financial performance. A sample of Chinese A-share listed firms in heavily polluting industries from 2012 to 2019 is used to empirically test this relationship. The results show that CEIR has a penalty effect on financial performance; firms with higher levels of environmental irresponsibility experience poorer financial performance. However, CD can mitigate this negative impact. This paper sheds light on the underlying motivations of firms neglecting their environmental responsibilities while being diligent in charitable activity. It provides theoretical foundation and policy recommendations for addressing imbalances in corporate social responsibility based on whether firms can offset environmental shortcomings through charitable acts.
... Waste refers to the end of the food chain [5], that is, retail and consumption, and leftovers refer to food that is prepared in excess, served and not consumed. According to the special report released by [6] (p. 1), food waste consists of "any product or part of a product This study is justified and supported by some indicators that inform that families waste, on average, 353 g of food per day or 128.8 kg per year [19], which signals environmental irresponsibility [20]. Waste, in this sense, is equivalent to 114 g daily per capita, representing annual waste of 41.6 kg per person. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Food waste is a situation that triggers certain controversy, considering that there is still a significant number of people who do not have access to healthy and nutritious food every day. The management of food leftovers from school lunches depends on the creation of measurement mechanisms. Thus, current characteristics of schools should be identified in order to mitigate and better manage these leftovers. This study addresses this gap, that is, it seeks to understand how food waste management is carried out in schools from a circular economy perspective. Methods: Focusing on the management of school lunches in municipal schools, this study aims to build an inductive interpretive theory in order to understand how schools promote food waste management. Results: Loss estimates and their monetization were identified and explained, and alternatives for waste recovery using the ReSOLVE framework were proposed. Conclusions: Therefore, it was assumed that the perspective of circularity is a possible and viable way to manage food waste in school lunches. Stakeholder engagement and awareness raising become necessary premises for success in the food circularity journey.
Article
Firms, especially heavy-polluting firms, are facing intense pressure from informal environmental regulations, which play a unique role in promoting heavy-polluting firms’ green technology innovation (GTI). Communities and ENGOs are two important informal environmental regulation entities that have different influence mechanisms to stimulate heavy-polluting firms in GTI. The research results indicate that heavy-polluting firms’ GTI follows an inverted U-shape as the number of communities around these firms increases, whereas it follows a positive linear correlation as the number of ENGOs increases. Interestingly, ownership types and administrative hierarchy distance positively moderate the curvilinear and linear relationships. State-owned enterprises (SOEs) are more inclined to maintain their legitimacy by fulfilling communities’ and ENGOs’ environmental requirements than non-SOEs. A shorter administrative hierarchy distance means that firms are supervised by high-level governments. The autonomy effect of lower-level governments does not affect the vigorous enforcement of environmental policies, which also enhances these two relationships.
Article
Full-text available
Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) have been praised as vehicles for tackling complex sustainability issues, but their success relies on the reconciliation of stakeholders’ divergent perspectives. We yet lack a thorough understanding of the micro-level mechanisms by which stakeholders can deal with these differences. To develop such understanding, we examine what frames—i.e., mental schemata for making sense of the world—members of MSIs use during their discussions on sustainability questions and how these frames are deliberated through social interactions. Whilst prior framing research has focussed on between-frame conflicts, we offer a different perspective by examining how and under what conditions actors use shared frames to tackle ‘within-frame conflicts’ on views that stand in the way of joint decisions. Observations of a deliberative environmental valuation workshop and interviews in an MSI on the protection of peatlands—ecosystems that contribute to carbon retention on a global scale — demonstrated how the application and deliberation of shared frames during micro-level interactions resulted in increased salience, elaboration, and adjustment of shared frames. We interpret our findings to identify characteristics of deliberation mechanisms in the case of within-frame conflicts where shared frames dominate the discussions, and to delineate conditions for such dominance. Our findings contribute to an understanding of collaborations in MSIs and other organisational settings by demonstrating the utility of shared frames for dealing with conflicting views and suggesting how shared frames can be activated, fostered and strengthened.
Article
Full-text available
Firms have traditionally responded to environmental violations by increasing information disclosure and/or communication to manage stakeholder perceptions. As such, these approaches may be symbolic in nature, with no genuine intention to improve the environment. We draw from restorative justice grounded in stakeholder theory and explore a relatively new approach in the form of supplemental environmental projects (SEPs) aimed at restoring the environment, and empirically examine the role of corporate governance (board structure) in firms’ decisions to undertake reparative actions. Using environmental violations and SEPs data from the US Environmental Protection Agency between 2002 and 2015, we find that firms with smaller boards are more likely to undertake SEPs. We also find that firms with higher board independence and CEO duality undertake SEPs more frequently; however, board gender diversity and the existence of a sustainability committee appear to have no impacts. These results are robust to propensity score matching and an alternative data source. We extend the scope of stakeholder theory by emphasizing a new approach—restorative justice—by which corporations can repair damaged relationships and also improve the environment. We also contribute to corporate governance and environmentalism literature by identifying governance structures that promote environmental restorative justice. Thus, our study will inform different stakeholders, including regulators, shareholders, and boards of directors, and will open new avenues for business ethics scholarship.
Article
Full-text available
Social movement scholars typically have focused either on how social movements strategically use collective action frames to confront targets and mobilize supporters, or on how targets respond to social movements. Few have captured the interactional dynamics between the two. This neglect tends to obscure how an extant collective action frame may shift, or how a new one may arise during such interactions. To address this issue, we focus on movement-target interactions and illuminate the microfoundations of framing that produce a new collective action frame. Drawing on real-time participant observations, we examine how an unintended collective action frame emerged and escalated during a year-long interaction between the Occupy London movement and St Paul’s Cathedral, Church of England. Occupy protesters shifted from a “Capitalism is Crisis” frame targeting the UK’s financial establishment, to a “What Would Jesus Do?” frame targeting the Church. We develop a process model based on the interplay of frame laminations and three situational mechanisms—emotional attachment to a frame, frame sacralization, and frame amplification—derived from an analysis of framing in movement-target interactions to explain the emergence and escalation of an unexpected collective action frame.
Article
Full-text available
Global supply chains enhance value, but are subject to governance problems and encourage evasive practices that deter sustainability, especially in developing countries. This article proposes that the precontractual environment, where parties are interested in trade but have not yet negotiated formal terms, can enable a unique process for building long-term sustainable relations. We argue that precontractual signals based on relation-specific investments, promises of repeated exchange, and reassuring cheap talk can be leveraged in precontract by the power of framing. We show how these framing signals are amplified in precontract because the lack of credible information, minimal time for reflection, and the role of risk-aversion present in supply chain contract negotiations. The result is a process that is uniquely productive for building long-term and value-generating contractual relations in supply chains, particularly in skeptical or even hostile negotiating contexts. We then show how framed precontractual signals generate a joint contractual surplus through a supernormal profit known as a relational rent. This rent can be invested to improve sustainable practices, an efficient option in a competitive market due to the second order effects that sustainable practices generate. This novel process we propose thus potentially generates superior returns to other trust measures and encourages focus on precontract as a fertile environment for building sustainable investments.
Article
Full-text available
We examine the framing mechanisms used to maintain a cross-sector partnership (XSP) that was created to address a complex long-term social issue. We study the first eight years of existence of an XSP that aims to create a market for recycled phosphorus, a nutrient that is critical to crop growth but whose natural reserves have dwindled significantly. Drawing on 27 interviews and over 3,000 internal documents, we study the evolution of different frames used by diverse actors in an XSP. We demonstrate the role of framing in helping actors to avoid some of the common pitfalls for an XSP, such as debilitating conflict, and in creating sufficient common ground to sustain collaboration. As opposed to a commonly held assumption in the XSP literature, we find that collaboration in a partnership does not have to result in a unanimous agreement around a single or convergent frame regarding a contentious issue. Rather, successful collaboration between diverse partners can also be achieved by maintaining a productive tension between different frames through ‘optimal’ frame plurality – not excessive frame variety that may prevent agreements from emerging, but the retention of a select few frames and the deletion of others towards achieving a narrowing frame bandwidth. One managerial implication is that resources need not be focussed on reaching a unanimous agreement among all partners on a single mega-frame vis-à-vis a contentious issue, but can instead be used to kindle a sense of unity in diversity that allows sufficient common ground to emerge, despite the variety of actors and their positions.
Article
Firms’ stigmatization due to deviation from social norms has received extensive attention in recent years. The increasing significance of the social norm requiring firms to protect the natural environment contributes to the emergence of pollution stigma over the heavily polluting firms. We apply the stigma theory to the National Specially Monitored firms of China and expand past research by developing a framework to understand the interactive effects of external stakeholder’s pressure on the tendency for these firms to disengage from the pollution stigma. We find that (a) there is diminishing returns to scale in the joint effect between hard and soft regulative pressure and in that between regulative and normative pressure, (b) the positive effect of mimetic pressure from environmental protection exemplary firms is exacerbated when dilution of stigma responsibility is low, and (c) dilution of stigma responsibility weakens the positive effect of stigma intensity on firms’ disengagement tendencies.
Article
Despite scientific consensus on the need to rapidly decarbonize economic systems to limit global warming, the exploitation of fossil fuels continues unabated. This begs the question, why do we continue down this path? We argue that one reason is the way in which fossil fuel expansion is temporally framed. In this article, we examine the disputed development of hydraulic fracturing of shale gas (‘fracking’) in the United Kingdom. Through analysis of a series of public inquiries conducted by the UK Government we show how industry, government and NGOs have engaged in a framing contest in debating the future of fracking. The findings show how the framing of fossil fuel development was solidified over time through processes of certainty, simplicity and familiarity. We contribute by: (a) showing how actors mobilize temporality in constructing persuasive and actionable frames; (b) developing a theory of how frames gain temporal portability – a chronology between a dominant past and a recognized future; and (c) providing an alternative theory of short-termism in explaining the path leading us to a dangerous climate changed future.