Conference PaperPDF Available

Close-Coupled SCR: An Approach to Meet Ultra-Low NOx Requirements for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines

Authors:

Abstract

The California Air Resources Board and US Environmental Protection Agency have defined their new ultra-low NOx standards for heavy-duty diesel engines (HDDE) over the last two years. In parallel, AVL has continued its research on how to meet these new limits and to address the continuing challenge of cold start emissions from HDDE, including incorporating • Advanced thermal management strategies to accelerate exhaust aftertreatment system (EAS) warm-up • Close-coupled selective catalytic reduction (ccSCR) system upstream of the current Euro VI or EPA 2013 EAS This paper will continue from the presentation at the 2019 CLEERS Workshop and present further developments in the research program including experimental results. These results include the following: • Measured effects of thermal management strategies on EAS warm-up • Test results using the ccSCR and “underfloor” SCR in combination • Strategies for successful ultra-low NOx compliance • Interactions between ccSCR system and on-board diagnostics (OBD) requirements AVL recommendations and next steps will also be discussed. [See https://cleers.org/cleers-workshops/workshop-abstracts/?entry_id=3199]
Public
AVL Powertrain Engineering Inc.
13 September 2021
John J. Kasab, Klaus Hadl, Bernhard Raser, Thomas Sacher, Gernot Graf
An approach to meet ultra-low NOx requirements for
heavy-duty diesel engines
Close-Coupled SCR
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 2Public
4
3
2
Introduction1
Overview
Emissions Concepts
ULNOx Demonstrator
Conclusion
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 3Public
Legislation Trends
Transition towards Zero-Impact Emissions
2020 20302025
-75%
-90%
-80%
EGR & SCR / SCR-only Dual Stage SCR & EGR
Relative NOxReduction
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 4Public
Legislation
Challenges for Future Worldwide Emission Legislations
Significant increase in development and validation effort compared to previous legislations
Diagnosis & Controls
Lifetime and Durability
Emission Compliance
Real Driving Emission
Legislative Boundaries
New Aftertreatment
Concepts
Sensor Technology
and Accuracy
On Board Monitoring
Time to Market
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 5Public
CARB Ultra-Low NOx Requirements Pose Challenges
in Parallel with HD GHG Requirements
NOxreduction of up to 90% compared to current standard proposed by CARB
Limit change of carve out NTE-regions and HDIUT with MAW method
MY 2022
MY 2023
MY 2026
HDIUT: MAW method with 300s window size divided into 3 bins (cold start excluded)
Pilot program on Real Emission Assessment Logging
NOx:0.02 g/bhp-hr FTP & RMC SET; 0.02 g/bhphr LLC; 5 g/hr idling
Lengthen useful life and Warranty for all engine classes
HDIUT: MAW method with 300s window size divided into 3 bins (cold start included)
MY 2024
STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 3
*: Nationwide certification of standard for complete fleet mandatory incl. compliance with all applicable existing and proposed requirements for the MY (i.e., warranty, OBD, HDIUT,…)
Source: Heavy-Duty Low NOxProgram, “Proposed Heavy-Duty Engine Standards”, CARB, Public Workshop, Diamond Bar, CA, 26/09/2019
Titles 13 and 17. California Air Resources Board, “; Notice of public hearing to consider the proposed heavy-duty engine and vehicle omnibus regulation and associated Amendments”, CARB, Letter, 23/06/2020
Proposed Optional 50-State Standard*:
NOx: 0.10 g/bhp-hr FTP & RMC SET
0.30 g/bhp-hr Low Load Cycle
10 g/hr idling standard
California Standards:
NOx: 0.05 g/bhp-hr FTP & RMC SET
0.20 g/bhp-hr Low Load Cycle
10 g/hr idling standard
MY 2027 and subsequent
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 6Public
Other considerations
There is much work to be done on the engine side for both NOx and GHG.
Manufacturers still need to improve engine fuel consumption or GHG emissions
50% BTE seems feasible from other AVL work, but will need
Advanced combustion
Higher peak firing pressure (PFP)
Improved air and EGR flows
On-board diagnostics (OBD) monitoring requirements are changing to a MAW method
More operation will be included in monitoring
OBD thresholds are expected to change when EPA implements its ultra-low NOx standard
Sensors are a key challenge
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 7Public
4
3
2
Introduction1
Overview
Emissions Concepts
ULNOx Demonstrator
Conclusion
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 8Public
Vehicle class N2, M2, M3
Intercity Bus
Distribution Truck
Vehicle class N3
Haulage
Tipper
Euro VII
CLOVE
“HD2”
(350mg/kWh NOx
in cold conditions;
90mg/kWh in hot)
2-stage SCR system with optional Ecat
optional DOC required in case of not using vanadium SCR technology
Euro VII
CLOVE
“HD3”
(175mg/kWh NOx
in cold conditions;
90mg/kWh in hot)
2-stage SCR system with Ecat
optional DOC required in case of not using vanadium SCR technology
Aftertreatment Concepts
Potential Emission Concepts for Euro VII (MD, HD)
DPF SCR
HC
TC
DEF
SCR
D
O
C
DEF
A
S
C
A
S
C
E
c
a
t
D
O
C
DPF SCR
HC
TC
DEF
SCR
D
O
C
DEF
A
S
C
A
S
C
E
c
a
t
D
O
C
DOC optional HC Doser optional
Dual Stage SCR enables
Highest NOxReduction
Real World Emissions Control
Highest Emission Durability
NOx/NH3/N2O Control
OBD/OBM Ability
*: Euro VI no NH3and N2O limit in ISC
E-Cat optional
2-stage SCR and additional heat-up measures as key enabler for lowest emissions.
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 9Public
Concept 1
US 1-stage SCR & Euro VII 2-stage SCR
Concept 2
Global usage of 2-stage SCR
US CARB MY27
Single-stage SCR for CARB MY27
1 global concept
Vanadium-SCR to be certified in US
(no ccDOC required)
Optional ccDOC and Cu/zeolite ccSCR
N2O emissions in case Cu/zeolite used
Potential alternatives to Ecat:
Early Exhaust Valve Opening
Cylinder Deactivation
Burner
Euro VII
Extension of system via close coupled Vanadium-SCR
to master stringent N2O, NH3and PN requirements via
2-stage SCR
Alternative to Ecat: Burner upstream DOC
Aftertreatment Concepts
Possible Global Emission Concepts for Euro VII and ULNOx
Vanadium
Fe/Cu-zeolite*
Fe/Cu-zeolite*
Box type muffler
Box type muffler
Extension of system by
a close coupled SCR
Vanadium or
Cu-zeolite
Fe/Cu-zeolite*
Box type muffler
Optional
*: Optional usage of Vanadium SCR if usage in US feasible
Optional
Optional
Optional
Sophisticated aftertreatment system required for future emission rules.
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 10Public
Aftertreatment strategies for Ultra-Low NOx
Need fast heat up with lower EO NOx to meet tailpipe NOx emissions targets.
Need “keep warm” strategy to maintain high NOx conversions at low load.
Lower engine-out (EO) NOx
during warm-up gives EAS
more time to get to 100%
NOx conversion.
3.5 g/bhp-hr: <50 s
1.5 g/bhp-hr: 240 s
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Engine Speed in %
NO
x
Tailpipe* in g/bhp-hr
Time [s]
0.75g/bhp-hr NOₓ EO 1.5g/bhp-hr NOₓ EO 2.0g/bhp-hr NOₓ EO
3.5g/bhp-hr NOₓ EO Engine speed
<50sec: 100% DeNO
x
170sec: 100% DeNO
x
240sec: 100% DeNO
x
* Assumption: 100% NO
x
conversion in warm US HDDTC
NO
x
in cold US HDDTC weighted (1/7) 440sec: 100%
Sources: de Monte, et al., 2018.
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 11Public
AVL has continued work on the close-coupled SCR concept
Use close-coupled SCR (ccSCR) for NOx control
Improves cold start performance (for HDDTC a.k.a. HD FTP)
Cheaper and more robust than close-coupled LNT
Use E-Cat upstream of ccSCR
Close-coupled DOC is optional—trade-off between thermal mass and oxicat performance
Use separate downstream DOC, DPF, SCR, and ASC for NOx and PM control
Box type muffler
DPF SCR
HC
TC
DEF
SCR
DEF
A
S
C
A
S
C
E-CAT
D
O
C
Source: de Monte, et al., 2018; Kasab, et al., 2019; Hadl, et al., 2021.
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 12Public
AVL Solution
Different diagnosis functions available
e.g., using the reduced storage capacity, efficiency based
Use control strategy in combination with OBD strategy to robustly detect 2 stage SCR systems
References
Single dosing application with AVL controls and OBD functionality for CN VI in Series
Internal and customer projects using AVL dual-dosing software including OBD functionality
Challenges for OBD
detection:
Robust detection of SCR systems
with high engine out NOx
Complex detection strategies
needed for 2 stage SCR systems
2-Stage SCR Software
OBD Challenges and Solutions
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 13Public
4
3
2
Introduction1
Overview
Emissions Concepts
ULNOx Demonstrator
Conclusion
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 14Public
AVL Demonstrator: Ultra-low NOxemissions demonstrated on testbed under laboratory conditions
NOxTailpipe 18 mg/bhp-hr in HDDTC (FTP) cold/hot
NOxTailpipe 34 mg/kW∙h in WHTC cold/hot
AVL Demonstrator
AVL R&D Ultra-low NOx& Euro VII Demonstrator
Target:
Definition of engine and EAS layout & calibration to fulfill ultra-low
NOxand Euro VII emission targets
Key System Features:
2L/cyl heavy duty engine
2-Stage SCR concept using AVL controls and catalyst technology
Electrical heated catalyst as system heat-up measure
Uncooled HP-EGR as NOxreduction measure in cold conditions
Smart DeNOxbalancing for passive DPF regeneration and low N2O
Favorable Trade-off between costs & efficiency Results partly published in Hadl, et al., 2021
The data included herein were collected in a laboratory which has not been certified by the relevant
authorities/agencies to perform emissions testing. These are indicative data and do not represent a
guarantee that the tested ca talyst or emissions system will pass the relevant emissions legislation.
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 15Public
-3000 -2000 -1000 0 1000 2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
0 250 500 750 1000 1250
NOxhot [mg/bhp-hr]
NO
x
cold [mg/bhp-hr]
NOxEmissions in US HDDTC (FTP)
AVL Demonstrator
Performance of a 2-Stage EAS – FTP c/h
97.1% DeNOxcold // 99.9% DeNOx hot // 99.6% DeNOxcombined
NOxEO cold: ~4g/bhp-hr
NOxEO hot: ~4.5g/bhp-hr
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Cold Hot Combined
NOxand N2O in mg/bhp-hr
NOx
Tailpipe
N2O
Tailpipe
5000
3500
2000
1500 4000
Limit N2O
V/Cu-zeolite Cu-zeolite
Engine Out
Limit NOx
Ultra-low NOxEmissions achieved on Demonstrator using 2-stage SCR.
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 16Public
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
Time [s]
NOx ds ccSCR
[ppm]
0
500
1000
n
[1/min]
0
1000
2000
Engine Mode
[-]
0
1
2
T Us ufSCR
[°C]
50
100
150
200
250
300
ccSCR_Mode
[-]
0
1
Ecat
[kW]
0
5
10
Cooler Bypass
[-]
0
1
AVL Demonstrator
2-Stage EAS – FTP Cold and Hot
FTP Cold and Hot
FTP Cold FTP Hot
NOxEO cold: ~4g/bhp-hr
NOxEO hot: ~4.5g/bhp-hr
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Cold Hot Combined
NOxand N2O in mg/bhp-hr
NOx Tailpipe
N2O Tailpipe
Limit
N2O
Limit
NOx
Rapid Heat-up
Best Fuel Consumption
Keep Warm
ccSCR Loading Based
ccSCR Efficiency Based
V/Cu-zeolite Cu-zeolite
3 Mode Engine Strategy for lowest CO2, 2-stage SCR and additional heat-up measures as key enabler for
lowest emissions, ccSCR efficiency/loading based control for high degree of passive regeneration.
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 17Public
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
NOx TP N2O TP
Emissions [mg/kWh]
Cold Hot Combined
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 140 0 1600 1800
Time [s]
NOx ds ccSCR
[ppm]
0
500
1000
n
[1/min]
0
1000
2000
Engine Mode
[-]
0
1
2
T Us ufSCR
[°C]
50
100
150
200
250
300
ccSCR_Mode
[-]
0
1
Ecat
[kW]
0
5
10
Cooler Bypass
[-]
0
1
AVL Demonstrator
2-Stage EAS – WHTC Cold and Hot
WHTC Cold and Hot
WHTC Cold WHTC Hot
NOxEO cold: ~7g/kWh
NOxEO hot: ~8g/kWh
Rapid Heat-up
Best Fuel Consumption
Keep Warm
ccSCR Loading Based
ccSCR Efficiency Based
CLOVE „HD2“
(350mg/kWh)
CLOVE 90%
hot MAW
CLOVE „HD3“
(=175mg/kWh)
N2O
from
ccSCR
Further N2O emission
reduction potential
by usage of different
catalyst technology
(e.g., Vanadium)
V/Cu-zeolite Cu-zeolite
3 Mode Engine Strategy for lowest CO2, 2-stage SCR and additional heat-up measures as key enabler for
lowest emissions, ccSCR efficiency/loading based control for high degree of passive regeneration.
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 18Public
4
3
2
Introduction1
Overview
Emissions Concepts
ULNOx Demonstrator
Conclusion
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 19Public
ccSCR
AVL Active DPF Soot
Management
HP EGR
Dual Stage
DEF dosing
AVL Model-Based
EAS control
E-Cat
2-Stage SCR for future worldwide legislation
Dual-stage SCR EAS for highest NOx reduction with maximum durability
Dual Stage SCR will enable
Highest NOx reduction
Real world emissions control
Highest emission durability
NOx, NH3, & N2O control
OBD / OBM ability
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 20Public
Conclusions
The future standards are possible to meet but will not be easy to meet.
CARB published the ultra-low NOx standards for MY2024 and MY2027
0.05 (g NOx/bhp∙h) for MY2024; 0.02 (g NOx/bhp∙h) for MY2027
Addition of Low Load Cycle and extended Not-to-Exceed zone
EPA Cleaner Trucks Initiative is still in process for MY2027
Thermal management of the EAS will be critical to meet NOx conversion targets
Need active measures for EAS warm-up and keep warm
AVL has demonstrated 18 (mg NOx/bhp-hr) using a ccSCR system with Ecat and aged parts
Ensuring durability over the extended FUL periods remains a challenge
Supporting future OBD requirements remains a challenge
Kasab, Hadl, Raser, Sacher, & Graf | CLEERS | 13 September 2021 |
/ 21Public
References
de Monte, M., Hadl, K., Noll, H., and Mannsberger, S., “SCR Control Strategies with Multiple
Reduction Devices for Lowest NOx Emissions,” SAE Heavy-Duty Diesel Emissions Control
Symposium, Gothenburg, 2018.
Kasab, J.J., de Monte, M., Hadl, K., Noll, H., Mannsberger, S., Graf, G., Theissl, H., and
Arnberger, A., “Using Close-Coupled SCR to Meet Ultra-Low NOx Requirements,” 2019
CLEERS Workshop, Ann Arbor, MI, 2019. (at https://cleers.org/wp-
content/uploads/formidable/3/2019CLEERS_Kasab_Web.pdf)
Edvardsson J., Hadl K., Hein, E., Kraus, G., Noll, H., Schwarz, C., Tamm, S., and Theissl H.,
“HD Diesel Engine – Exhaust Gas Temperature Management and Advanced Exhaust Gas
Aftertreatment Technology for Ultra-Low NOx Emission Legislation,In Liebl J., Beidl C., Maus
W. (eds) Internationaler Motorenkongress 2020. Proceedings. Springer Vieweg: Wiesbaden,
2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30500-0_11.
Hadl, K., Sacher, T., Raser, B., and Graf, G., “Solutions for Ultra Low NOx and Lowest CO2on
Heavy Duty Engines,MTZ-Motortechnische Zeitschrift 82, no. 3 (2021): 16–23,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s38313-020-0613-z.
Public
www.avl.com
Thank you
... The motivation for this work was to meet the 2027 NO x regulations with no additional support from a production engine (without CDA or engine calibration change) with an external heat source on an AT system. The recent works on the AT system to meet the 2027 NO x regulations include using a LO-SCR (Kasab et al., 2021;Matheaus et al., 2021;Sharp et al., 2021). This catalyst was added to a conventional AT system in this work. ...
Article
Full-text available
New regulations by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) demand a stringent 0.02 g/hp-hr tailpipe NO x limit by the year 2027, requiring Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) catalysts to provide high NO x conversions even at low (below 200°C) exhaust temperatures. This work describes utilizing an Electrically Heated Mixer System (EHM system) upstream of a Light-Off Selective Catalytic Reduction (LO-SCR) catalyst followed by a conventional aftertreatment (AT) system containing DOC, DPF, and SCR, enabling high NO x conversions meeting CARB’s NO x emission target. The AT catalysts were hydrothermally aged to Full Useful Life. Conventional unheated Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF) was injected upstream of both the LO-SCR and primary downstream SCR. The EHM system allowed for DEF to be injected as low as 130°C upstream of the LO-SCR, whereas, in previous studies, unheated DEF was injected at 180°C or dosed at 130°C with heated DEF. The combination of unheated DEF, EHM system, LO-SCR, and downstream SCR enabled the needed increase in NO x efficiency in low exhaust temperatures, which was observed in drive cycles such as in cold-FTP, LLC, and World Harmonized Transient Cycle (WHTC). There were several-fold reductions in tailpipe NO x using this configuration compared to its baseline: 3.3-fold reduction in FTP, 22-fold in Low Load Cycle (LLC), 38-fold in Beverage Cycle, 8-fold in “Stay Hot” Cycle, and 10-fold in WHTC. Finally, it is shown that the EHM system can heat the exhaust gas, such as during a cold start, without needing additional heating hardware integrated into the system. These results were observed without performing changes in the engine base calibration.
Article
Full-text available
High-efficiency and low-emissions heavy-duty (HD) internal combustion engines (ICEs) offer significant GHG reduction potential. Mild hybridization via regenerative braking and enabling the use of an electric heater component (EHC) for the aftertreatment system (ATS) warm-up extends these benefits, which can mitigate tailpipe GHG and NOx emissions simultaneously. Understanding such integrated hybrid powertrains is essential for the system optimization of real-world driving conditions. In the present work, the potential of a low engine-out NOx (1.5–2.5 g/kWh range) ‘Low-NOx’ HD diesel engine and EHCs were analyzed in a 48V P1 mild-hybrid system for a class 8 commercial vehicle concept and compared with those in an EPA-2010-certified HD diesel truck as a baseline under real-world driving cycles, including those from the US, Europe, India, China, as well as the world harmonized vehicle cycle (WHVC). For analysis, an integrated 1-D vehicle model was utilized that consisted of models of the ‘Low-NOx’ HD engine, the stock ATS, and a production EHC. For the real driving cycles, ‘GT-RealDrive’-based vehicle speed profiles were generated for busy trucking routes for different markets. For each cycle, the effects of the Low-NOx and EHC performances were quantified in terms of the ATS warm-up time, engine-out NOx emissions, and net fuel consumption. Depending on the driving route, the regenerative braking fully or partly neutralized the EHC power penalty without a significant impact on the ATS thermal performance. For a two-EHC system, the fueling penalty associated with every second reduction in the warm-up time FCEHC (g/s) was several-fold higher for the real driving routes compared with the WHVC. Overall, while a multi-EHC setup accelerated the ATS warm-up, a single EHC integrated at the SCR inlet showed minimized EHC heating power, leading to a minimized fueling penalty. Finally, for the India and China routes, being highly transient, the P1 hybridization proved inadequate for GHG reduction due to the limited energy recuperation. A stronger hybridization was desirable for such driving cycles.
Article
Full-text available
Engine and aftertreatment solutions are being identified to meet the upcoming ultra-low NO x regulations on heavy duty vehicles as published by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and proposed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) for the year 2027 and beyond. These standards will require changes to current conventional aftertreatment systems for dealing with low exhaust temperature scenarios. One approach to meeting this challenge is to supply additional heat from the engine; however, this comes with a fuel penalty which is not attractive and encourages other options. Another method is to supply external generated heat directly to the aftertreatment system. The following work focuses on the later approach by maintaining the production engine calibration and coupling this with an Electric Heater (EH) upstream of a Light-Off Selective Catalytic Reduction (LO-SCR) followed by a primary aftertreatment system containing a downstream Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR). External heat is supplied to the aftertreatment system using an EH to reduce the Tailpipe (TP) NO x emissions with minimal fuel penalty. Two configurations have been implemented, the first is a Close Coupled (CC) LO-SCR configuration and the second is an Underfloor (UF) LO-SCR configuration. The CC LO-SCR configuration shows the best outcome as it is closer to the engine, helping it achieve the required temperature with lower EH power while the UF LO-SCR configurations addresses the real-world packaging options for the LO-SCR. This work shows that a 7 kW EH upstream of a LO-SCR, in the absence of heated Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF), followed by a primary aftertreatment system met the 2027 NO x regulatory limit. It also shows that the sub-6-inch diameter EH with negligible pressure drop can be easily packaged into the future aftertreatment system.
Article
New EU7 emission standards are currently under development. While the timing and exact level of stringency of these standards is not available, both OEMs and suppliers are preparing to meet significantly reduced tailpipe NOx and particle number standards for both light- and heavy-duty vehicles. We present here some of the emission control systems that are likely to be implemented and details on the advanced component technologies.
Conference Paper
div class="section abstract"> This review covers advances in regulations and technologies in the past year in the field of vehicular emissions. We cover major developments towards reducing criteria pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions from both light- and heavy-duty vehicles and off-road machinery. To suggest that the transportation is transforming rapidly is an understatement, and many changes have happened already since our review last year [ 1 ]. Notably, the US and Europe revised the CO2 standards for light-duty vehicles and electrification mandates were introduced in various regions of the world. These have accelerated plans to introduce electrified powertrains, which include hybrids and pure electric vehicles. However, a full transformation to electric vehicles and the required grid decarbonization will take time, and policy makers are accordingly also tightening criteria pollutant standards for internal combustion engines. California has published the Advanced Clean Cars II standards and Europe has held various workshops outlining the core elements of future Euro 7 regulations. These will likely be the last major regulations for criteria pollutants, and compliant vehicles will likely be zero-impact emitting, that is with tailpipe emissions at or lower than the ambient concentrations. Meeting these regulations will require adoption of several advanced engine and emission control technologies which we discuss here. Emphasis will be on reducing cold start emissions, likely requiring active thermal management strategies. The challenge will be to lower criteria pollutants while also reducing fuel consumption, and we review some approaches being considered. The story is similar for heavy-duty vehicles, where meeting California’s Low NOx regulations and Euro VII scenarios require significantly improved engine controls and after-treatment systems. New system solutions and hardware additions show a pathway to meeting the regulations, although we caution that much more work is needed ahead to achieve the reductions over extended durability limits and with healthy engineering margins. We also review the impact of alternative fuels on reducing well-to-wheels (WTW) greenhouse gas emissions, along with recommendations to continue improving market fuel quality to reduce negative impact on criteria pollutants. Finally, while this paper does not intend to provide a detailed review of battery electric or fuel cell vehicle technology, we touch upon a few studies which discuss the outlook of powertrain diversification from a total cost of ownership and greenhouse gas reduction perspective. </div
SCR Control Strategies with Multiple Reduction Devices for Lowest NOx Emissions
  • M De Monte
  • K Hadl
  • H Noll
  • S Mannsberger
 de Monte, M., Hadl, K., Noll, H., and Mannsberger, S., "SCR Control Strategies with Multiple Reduction Devices for Lowest NOx Emissions," SAE Heavy-Duty Diesel Emissions Control Symposium, Gothenburg, 2018.
Using Close-Coupled SCR to Meet Ultra-Low NOx Requirements
  • J J Kasab
  • M De Monte
  • K Hadl
  • H Noll
  • S Mannsberger
  • G Graf
  • H Theissl
  • A Arnberger
 Kasab, J.J., de Monte, M., Hadl, K., Noll, H., Mannsberger, S., Graf, G., Theissl, H., and Arnberger, A., "Using Close-Coupled SCR to Meet Ultra-Low NOx Requirements," 2019 CLEERS Workshop, Ann Arbor, MI, 2019. (at https://cleers.org/wpcontent/uploads/formidable/3/2019CLEERS_Kasab_Web.pdf)