PreprintPDF Available

PVP-I and Iota-Carrageenan Improve Subjective Clinical Symptoms In COVID-19 Emergency Hospital Wisma Atlet, Indonesia: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Authors:
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.
ISSN: 03875547
Volume 44, Issue 05, October, 2021
1659
PVP-I and Iota-Carrageenan Improve Subjective
Clinical Symptoms In COVID-19 Emergency Hospital
Wisma Atlet, Indonesia: A Single-Blind Randomized
Clinical Trial
Rahmi Amtha1, Indrayadi Gunardi1, Ahmad Hidayat2, Iwan Dewanto3, Putro Setyobudyo Muhammad4
Oral Medicine Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Trisakti University, Jakarta, Indonesia1
Research and Development Department, Indonesian Doctor Association, Indonesia2
Department of Dental Public Health and Management, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, School of
Dentistry, University Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Bantul, Indonesia3
Medical doctor at COVID-19 Emergency Hospital Wisma Atlet, Indonesia4
Keywords:
ABSTRACT
COVID-19, iota-carrageenan,
PVP-I, symptom.
COVID-19 caused various symptomatic manifestations in humans. Viral
reservoirs are found at naso-oropharyngeal areas and challenge the dentist
to reduce the virus using antiseptics, such as PVP-I and Iota-carrageenan
(IC). Clinical trials of the above regimes on COVID-19 patients have
never been carried out. Aim: To evaluate subjective clinical symptoms in
COVID-19 patients after using PVP-I 1% mouthwash and IC nasal spray.
Method. A single-blind randomized clinical trial was done in Wisma Atlet
emergency hospital. Recruitment of subjects obtains from those who
fulfilled the inclusion criteria under informed consent. Eighty-nine
subjects who received standard drug of COVID-19 were then divided into
Group-A that received PVP-I for 14 days, IC for seven days, and Group-
B, who did not receive. Data collections were recorded at the beginning
and end of observation for 17 subjective clinical symptoms. Chi- square
was used to find the correlation among groups. Results. Male, 19-30 y.o
were dominant in both groups. The mean duration of PVP-I and IC used
was 5.6 and 5.51 days, respectively. The five frequent symptoms were
anosmia, dry cough, fever, slimed cough, and headache. On the 8th day,
there was a significant difference in symptoms between-group in dry
cough (P=0.003), fever (P=0.024), and sore throat (P=0.001), and
dysgeusia (P=0.042) on the 14th day. Conclusions. Using PVP-I
mouthwash six times/day and iota-carrageenan nasal spray three
times/day for 5 to 6 days may reduce several subjective clinical
symptoms.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0
International License.
1. INTRODUCTION
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the β-type coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has a vast impact on the
Amtha, et.al, 2021 Teikyo Medical Journal
1660
national health system, not only in Indonesia but in the world. Reported that 41% of COVID- 19 patients
occurred due to nosocomial transmission [1]. WHO states that this disease spreads through droplets,
splatter, or aerosols from the mouth or nose [2]. The mean SARS-CoV-2 virus in saliva was found to be 3.3
x 106 copies / mL [3]. Therefore, the mouth and nasopharynx are considered as a source (reservoir) of
transmission of COVID-19.
Povidone-iodine (PVP-I), which was first discovered in 1955, has antimicrobial properties in the presence
of the free iodine (I2) ion. In the free ionic form, iodine will enter rapidly into the plasma membrane of
microbes and disrupt the protein and nucleic acid structure to be oxidized so that microorganisms die.
According to [4], PVP-I has broad-spectrum effectiveness against various oral pathogens such as
Porphyromonas gingivalis, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Tannerella
forsythensis, Prevotella intermedia, and Streptococcus anginosus. Its effectiveness can be achieved in less
than 15 seconds of exposure. Against biofilm formation, PVP-I can also suppress the formation of oral
mucosal biofilms to reduce plaque formation and dental caries in children [5]. Research at Duke University
Singapore reported in vitro that exposure to 30 seconds of PVP-I 0.5-1% could kill the SARS-CoV-2 virus
by four log10 with an effectiveness of 99.99% [6]. The study results at TIDREC Malaysia showed that
PVP-I 0.5% or 1% was able to reduce >5 log10 virus titers within 30 seconds with effectiveness of 99,99%
[7]. The effectiveness of PVP-I against viruses is more effective than chlorhexidine gluconate and
benzalkonium chloride [8], [9]. PVP-I is effective against SARS-CoV, which causes SARS infection [10],
MERS-CoV [11], Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara (MVA), the new European test virus for enveloped
viruses [12], and Avian Influenza [13]. The use of PVP-I, of 0.23% for 2 minutes, reduced the quantity of
SARS-CoV-2 virus to undetectable levels. Meanwhile, for MERS-CoV, it was found that PVP- I with a
concentration of 1% used for 30 seconds was able to reduce viral activity by more than 99.99% but not at a
concentration of 0.1% [12]. PVP-I can suppress TNF-α, which acts as an inflammatory regulator in many
chronic diseases [14]. PVP-I also effectively reduces the severity and accelerates the duration of upper
respiratory tract infections such as common cold influenza, and tonsillopharyngitis [15], [16] Besides, the
use of PVP-I in critically ill patients on a ventilator prevents the development of ventilator-associated
pneumonia [17].
The toxicity of PVP-I is much less than that of iodine tincture. Therefore, WHO recommends using PVP-I
with a concentration of 0.7-10% as a safe and surgical antiseptic [18]. Besides, the use of PVP-I can reduce
the risk of bacteremia significantly (1.5 to 3 times) compared with sterile water [19]. Allergic response to
PVP-I is scarce and was only found in 2 out of 500 subjects who used the substance [20] and no cases of
resistance to PVP-I [15].
The use of PVP-I in children has also been studied in Japan. PVP-I gargling for upper respiratory tract
infection prevention 4-5 times per day for 2-3 months did not find any side effects [21]. According to [22],
public health interventions in preventing the spread of COVID-19 infection can be carried out by gargling
and nasal spray using PVP-I as an additional regimen for personal protective equipment (PPE). In its
guidelines in August 2020, WHO recommended PVP-I 0.2% or hydrogen peroxide 1% as a mouthwash
before examining various procedures involving the mouth area to reduce oral microbial titers, including
SARS-CoV-2 [23].
Several research protocols were carried out to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in the oral cavity and including the
nasopharynx. One of them is an intervention in the nasal area using Iota-carrageenan. This material is
reported to have the ability to eradicate various types of viruses, including the OC43 and 229E coronavirus
types [24]. Iota-carrageenan is a polymer derived from red algae that have been shown to reduce viral load
ISSN: 03875547
Volume 44, Issue 05, October, 2021
1661
in nasal secretions and adult and pediatric patients [24], [25]. The mechanism of action of iota-carrageenan
is not systemic. Iota-carrageenan does not penetrate the nasal mucosa, and its antiviral effect is based on its
physical mechanism of action. It forms a mucoadhesive layer in the nasal cavity. This mucoadhesive layer
will envelop the germs and prevent germs from sticking to the nasal mucosa [26] analyzed two randomized
placebo-controlled clinical trials on using the iota-carrageenan nasal spray in children and adults with a
common cold caused by viruses. It showed that using the iota-carrageenan nasal spray in the early days of
common cold symptoms decreases the duration of illness to 2 days, increases viral clearance, and decreases
the recurrence rate of common cold symptoms. Both studies also show that the tolerability of the iota-
carrageenan nasal spray is good. There were no severe or non-serious adverse events that occurred in
association with using the iota-carrageenan nasal spray. Iota-carrageenan was able to eradicate 99% of the
viral load in the nasal secretions in pediatric and adult patients. These include eradicating human
coronavirus types OC43 and 229E, influenza virus type A, human metapneumovirus, respiratory syncytial
virus, and parainfluenza type 3 [16]. In the results of a study by [27] on human and animal influenza type A
viruses, it was found that iota-carrageenan effectively inhibited viral replication with or without other
antiviral drugs even after 72 hours after infection.
Various clinical trials have been carried out to find drugs that can help prevent the transmission of the virus
that causes COVID-19. There are no clinical trial reports regarding the use of PVP-I mouthwash and Iota-
carrageenan nasal spray to date, as a continuation of the various in vitro test results from various countries
that have been carried out. The study was conducted to determine the benefits of using these two
ingredients to reduce symptoms caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients at COVID-19 Emergency
Hospital (RSDC) Wisma Atlet Jakarta. Wisma Atlet is one of the COVID-19 Emergency Hospitals
designated by the government as independent isolation for patients with mild and moderate symptoms. It is
hoped that the study will contribute to the benefits of PVP-I and iota-carrageenan in reducing mild to
moderate subjective clinical symptoms due to SARS-CoV-2 infection to help control the transmission of
COVID-19, which sources mainly come from the mouth and nose area.
2. METHOD
A single-blind randomized clinical trial was carried out in RSDC Wisma Atlet on September-October 2020.
Subjects were recruited after receiving an explanation from the researcher and filling in the informed
consent. Ninety-five subjects were recruited based on inclusion and exclusions criteria. A total of 89
subjects were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were patients with positive PCR results for COVID-
19, were still conscious and able to carry out their activities, were willing to use mouthwash and nasal
sprays that had been provided, aged over 18 years, the longest being treated at RSDC was not more than
three weeks, willing to fill out the monitoring application provided. Exclusion criteria were no allergy
history-related PVP-I or equivalent substance (alkylphenol ether sulfate (ammonium salt), and disodium
hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate), no history of thyroid disease or disturbance, not in pregnancy period,
and unable to gargle. All subjects received standard treatment for COVID-19 patients. The subject was
divided into two groups, A and B. Group A consisted of 45 subjects who received standard treatment, 1%
PVP-I mouthwash six times a day for 14 days, and iota-carrageenan nasal spray three times a day for seven
days. Group B consist of 44 subjects who received only standard treatment for COVID-19. One percent
PVP-I mouthwash (Betadine®, PT. Mundhipharma Laboratories, Indonesia) and 1.2mg/mL iota-
carrageenan (Betadine Cold Defense Nasal Spray®, PT. Mundhipharma Laboratories, Indonesia) were used
in this study. Symptoms COVID-19 were defined as subjective symptoms according to the subject that was
recorded daily using an online application provided.
The single-blind method was used in this study and numbers of subjective symptoms based on the case
Amtha, et.al, 2021 Teikyo Medical Journal
1662
report monitoring by WHO [28] such as sore throat, slimed cough, dry cough, fever, runny nose, difficulty
breathing, anosmia, dysgeusia, dry mouth, muscle pain, joint pain, malaise, headache, abdominal pain,
diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and skin rash. All symptoms recorded were then classified into three categories
improve, the same condition, and worsen. Any adverse events were recorded and managed by the medical
team in RSDC Wisma Atlet. Ethical clearance was received from Ethical Commission RSDC Wisma Atlet
No. Sprin/3274/VIII/2020/RSDCWA. All subjects were under medical surveillance of clinical trial by
RSDC Wisma Atlet medical team. Data were analyzed descriptively based on the proportion of subjects.
3. RESULT
This study was done from September until October 2020, when the population of COVID-19 patients in
Jakarta reaching the highest number in Indonesia, compared to other provinces. RSDC Wisma Atlet Jakarta
only treated a patient with minimal to moderate symptoms, while severe symptoms patients were treated in
another hospital. Most of the subjects treated at RSDC Wisma Atlet had mild symptoms or were said to
have conditions without symptoms or people without symptoms. One of the criteria for moderate symptoms
is shortness of breath and accompanied by radiological evidence of moderate to severe pneumonia. In such
conditions, RSDC has regulations to transfer the patient to a designated COVID-19 hospital immediately.
The shortness of breath symptoms reported in this study are subjective, so the radiological data is no longer
taken as the screening has been done before patient admission. Table 1 shows the characteristic of the
subject population among groups. All subjects have completed the study without adverse events reported,
and all subjects took both drugs; none used only one drug.
Table 1. Characteristic of COVID-19 patients in RSDC Wisma Atlet.
Variables
A
n (%)
B
n (%)
Sex
Male
19-30 years old
22 (11%)
18 (9%)
31-40 years old
6 (3%)
13 (6.5%)
>40 years old
3 (1.5%)
5 (2.5%)
Female
19-30 years old
6 (3%)
2 (1%)
31-40 years old
5 (2.5%)
4 (2%)
>40 years old
3 (1.5%)
2 (1%)
Domicile
DKI Jakarta
Bodetabek
Others
31 (15.5%)
10 (5%)
4 (2%)
33 (16.5%)
8 (4%)
3 (1.5%)
Job
Student
Police/Army
Government employee
General employee
Entrepreneur
Unemployment
3 (1.5%)
0
1 (0.5%)
33 (16.5%)
5 (2.5%)
3 (1.5%)
3 (1.5%)
2 (1%)
3 (1.5%)
32 (16%)
2 (1%)
2 (1%)
Exposure to COVID-19
Contact with other
Travel abroad
Do not know
No answer
17 (8.5%)
0
25 (12.5%)
3 (1.5%)
22 (11%)
2 (1%)
18 (9%)
2 (1%)
ISSN: 03875547
Volume 44, Issue 05, October, 2021
1663
Table 2. Duration of COVID-19 treatment in RSDC Wisma Atlet between groups.
Duration (days)
Group
A
B
Standard COVID-19 treatment
Mean
12
11.30
Mouthwash treatment for 6 times/day
Mean
Range (min-max)
5.6
1 14
-
Nasal spray treatment for 3 times/day
Mean
Range (min-max)
5.51
2 - 7
-
Both groups showed a similar mean duration of receiving a standard COVID-19 regime in RSDC Wisma
Atlet (Table 2). The mean mouthwash and nasal spray use duration among groups A and B was 5.6 days
and 5.51 days, respectively. During follow-up, it was noted that none of the patients reported
discontinuation of mouthwash and nasal sprays in the middle of the study. Of the 14 days prescribed to use
mouthwash and seven days for nasal spray, the subjects only used mouthwash for 5.6 days and nasal spray
for 5.51 days.
Table 3 shows the distribution of subjects who experienced changes in subjective symptoms, namely
changes in symptom improvement, remained the same, or worsened. The five initial subjective symptoms
most frequently reported at RSDC Wisma Atlet in groups A and B were anosmia, dry cough, fever, and
slimed cough, and headache. A total of 50 - 100% of subjects who received mouthwash and nasal spray
reported improvement in subjective symptoms of all symptoms. It also occurred in 75-100% of group B
subjects. In group A, 5% reported no change in anosmia before and after using both drugs. Likewise for dry
cough symptoms by 9%, dysgeusia and headaches by 10%, joint pain by 14%, fever by 25%, and
abdominal pain by 50%.
In contrast, those who experienced worsening were only found in group A at 10% for symptoms of slimed
cough. In group B, 10% of subjects reported no change (the same) in sore throat symptoms at the beginning
and the end of the observation, while 18% reported worsening diarrhea symptoms. There was a significant
difference between groups A and B in the subjective symptoms of dry cough (P=0.003), fever (P=0.024),
sore throat (P=0.001) on the 8th day of drug use; and dysgeusia (P=0.042) on the 14th day. On day 8th, It
was shown that there were significant differences in some subjective symptoms. It might be because the
subject received two regimes (PVP-I and IC) that act in the naso-oropharynx, which is the reservoir of the
virus. Whereas on the 14th day, the nasal spray has been stopped, and the use of mouthwash can only
reduce the symptoms of dysgeusia which are prominent in the oral cavity of COVID-19 patients. On the
other hand, it is also possible due to the characteristic of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that will naturally subside
within two weeks.
Table 3. Percentage of subjective clinical symptoms severity distribution among groups.
Subjective
Clinical
symptoms
Beginning
Observation
(%)
End Observation
(%)
Day-8
Day-14
Improve
No different
Worsen
X2
P
X2
P
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
Anosmia
42.22
25
40
25
2.22
-
-
-
NA
3.516
0.06
Dry cough
24.44
29.55
22.22
29.55
2.22
-
-
-
8.391
0.003**
0.335
0.562
Fever
22.22
29.55
22.22
29.55
-
-
-
-
5.064
0.024*
1.433
0.231
Slimed cough
22.22
18.18
20
18.18
-
-
2.22
-
3.6
0.057
0.72
0.396
Amtha, et.al, 2021 Teikyo Medical Journal
1664
Sore throat
20
18.18
20
15.91
-
2.27
-
-
9.919
0.001**
0.562
0.453
Headache
22.22
11.36
20
11.36
2.22
-
-
-
2.142
0.143
2.4
0.121
Runny nose
17.78
18.18
13.33
18.18
4.44
-
-
-
1.333
0.248
0
1
Dysgeusia
20
25
17.78
25
2.22
-
-
-
NA
4.104
0.042*
Difficulty breathing
20
6.82
20
6.82
-
-
-
-
0.8
0.371
NA
Nausea/vomit
20
4.55
20
4.55
-
-
-
-
NA
NA
Malaise
17.78
11.36
17.78
11.36
-
-
-
-
NA
NA
Joint pain
15.56
4.55
13.33
4.55
2.22
-
-
-
NA
1.147
0.284
Dry mouth
13.33
6.82
13.33
6.82
-
-
-
-
NA
NA
Muscle pain
13.33
9.09
13.33
9.09
-
-
-
-
NA
NA
Diarrhea
6.67
11.36
6.67
9.09
-
-
-
2.27
NA
NA
Abdominal pain
4.44
0
2.22
0
2.22
-
-
-
NA
NA
Skin rash
2.22
2.27
2.22
2.27
-
-
-
-
NA
NA
* P<0.05; ** P<0.01
4. DISCUSSION
The clinical trial study of PVP-I and Iota carrageenan in COVID-19 patients at RSDC Wisma Atlet
Kemayoran refers to in vitro data from various studies [6], [7], [9], and the first study done in Indonesia.
During the research, the profile characteristics of COVID-19 patients at RSDC represent a portion of
COVID-19 patients profile in Jakarta (available on http://corona.jakarta.go.id), which is composed of a
combination of data from all health care facilities.
Based on the results of this study, the number of men infected with SARS-CoV-2 was more than women.
According to [29], gender can indeed affect the possibility of exposure to infectious diseases to fellow
individuals, which is influenced by several factors such as the work environment, attitudes or behavior, type
of work (which is at risk), the ability and habits of individuals to seek treatment, responsibility in-home or
work [30]. In a meta-analysis report by [31], it was found that based on the proportion of patients confirmed
COVID-19, there was no sex difference, but the number of males was higher than females in terms of the
number of patients requiring intensive care. The study results at RSDC Wisma Atlet Kemayoran are similar
to a meta-analysis of 57 studies in the world, and it was found that the prevalence pool of COVID-19 in
men vs. women was 55 vs. 45 (P <0.001) [32].
Based on the age group among males and females, the most infected is the 19-30 year-old group, while in
the Jakarta population data pool, the most age group is 30-39 years old. It is probably due to the RSDC
Wisma Atlet Kemayoran only a small part of the location where COVID-19 patients are distributed in
Jakarta.
Most of the COVID-19 patients (68%) at RSDC are domiciled in Jakarta, followed by Tangerang (8%),
which is closest to RSDC Wisma Atlet Kemayoran. Meanwhile, other cities (Bekasi, Bogor, Depok) may
have independent isolation locations closer to the patient's domicile. Most (69.5%) COVID-19 patients
treated at RSDC are private employees.
Most of the research subjects came with unknown history of COVID-19 exposure; meanwhile, 40% of
subjects had a history of contact with COVID-19 patients. Most of these subjects are private employees and
entrepreneurs who are likely to have more activities outside the home and use public transportation. Based
on the research results by [33], it is concluded that the transmission of COVID-19 due to work at the
beginning of the pandemic is more often found in jobs related to community services, including public
ISSN: 03875547
Volume 44, Issue 05, October, 2021
1665
services, drivers, construction workers, and religious leaders. The average time to stay at the RSDC was 12
days in contrast to the study results by [34], which reported the median length of treatment for COVID-19
patients from 55 hospitals designated as COVID-19 care centers in Jakarta was 24 days. The fundamental
background of differences in duration above due to those who came and treated at RSDC Wisma Atlet was
mainly mild to moderate symptoms.
Based on the research design, the drug administration intervention was planned for 14 days. However, most
subjects did not reach that duration because most were being treated for around 12 days. The average of
mouthwash and nasal spray was used only 5-6 days. It might be due to several factors, such as no other
subjective symptoms related to COVID-19, and the patient's viral load has reached CT> 35, with no
potential of transmission.
The significant difference of clinical symptoms between groups A and B showed on days 8th and 14th. The
reason was that the subject in group A received two types of drugs (mouthwash and nasal spray) for the first
whole week that worked at the naso and oropharynx area, known as the reservoir of the virus. Meanwhile,
on day 14th, when the patient has stopped the nasal spray since day 8th, mouthwash reduced the symptoms
of dysgeusia. Apart from that, it could also be because the characteristics of the COVID-19 infection will
subside within two weeks in immunocompetent people. [34] reported that the symptoms of COVID-19
hospitalized patients were fever, malaise, shortness of breath, which were categorized as asymptomatic or
mild symptoms.
The subjective symptoms were analyzed individually. Group A experienced more subjective symptom
improvement than group B. It might be due to the intervention of the drug's active ingredients (I2 and iota-
carrageenan) on the cell membranes of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. According to [35], the oral mucosa has
ACE2 receptors, especially the tongue mucosa, compared to another oral mucosa. SARS-CoV-2, which has
a high affinity for the ACE2 receptor, will increase its viral titer in the oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal
areas if not prevented [36]. Povidone-iodine has high effectiveness against the SARS-CoV- 2 virus within
30 seconds in vitro [6], [7], affects the number of subjective symptoms reported in the two groups of
observations. Iota-carrageenan contained in nasal sprays is known to become a mucosal barrier so that the
SARS-CoV-2 virus cannot bind to its receptors. The results of this study are also in line with clinical trials
conducted in Singapore to evaluate the relationship between some commercial mouthwash and CT levels of
the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This study found that mouthwash containing PVP-I and CPC (cetylpyridium
chloride) significantly reduced viral CT within 5 minutes, while chlorhexidine gluconate was ineffective
[9]. The mechanism of using mouthwash and nasal sprays to improve subjective systemic symptoms such
as joint pain, shortness of breath, other symptoms are not fully known and still requires further research
concerning viral CT and systemic indicators.
There are several limitations of this study. The average duration of mouthwash and nasal sprays used in this
study cannot be established as the duration of general use, as the treatment of subjects in RSDC merely
follow the length of treatment at the RSDC Wisma Atlet Kemayoran. Some subjects might be admitted
more than 14 days as the recruitment day was not on the first day of admission. The study did not analyze a
model for reducing the risk of spreading COVID-19 infection through salivary droplets or aerosols due to
the absence of supporting data of susceptible subjects, laboratory analysis data required for the
pathogenesis. There is a tendency to decrease clinical symptoms among groups, while the study only used a
pragmatic approach to avoid researchers' daily active drug intervention. Proper education and instructions
before drug administration are essential, and the application of a drug schedule reminder in this study was
beneficial to determine the level of patient adherence [37].
Amtha, et.al, 2021 Teikyo Medical Journal
1666
5. CONCLUSION
Using both 1% PVP-I and Iotaa carrageenan nasal spray can reduce mild subjective symptoms complained
of by COVID-19 patients at RSDC Wisma Atlet Jakarta. Using PVP-I mouthwash six times per day and
iota-carrageenan nasal spray three times per day for average 5-6 days may reduce subjective clinical
symptoms.
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Thanks to the Indonesian Dental Association, Research and Development Indonesian Doctor Association,
Chairman of RSD COVID-19 Wisma Atlet Kemayoran, Dr. Farichah Hanum M.Kes, and volunteer health
workers, PT Mundhipharma Laboratories, PT Alumagubi Raya Indonesia.
7. ETHICS APPROVAL
This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Emergency COVID-19 Hospital
Wisma Atlet Kemayoran Jakarta, Indonesia.
8. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
Amtha, Gunardi, and Hidayat did the concept and designed the paper's structure, counted the result, and
reviewed the paper. Amtha, Gunardi wrote the paper. Dewanto, Gunardi and Muhammad collected and
analysis the data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
9. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No conflict of interest in the study.
10. FUNDING
This study was supported by the Indonesian Dental Association and PT Mundhipharma Laboratories
Indonesia. The funding sources had no role in the design of the study, analysis, and data interpretation as
well as in the manuscript writing.
11. REFERENCE
[1] Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized
Patients With 2019 Novel CoronavirusInfected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020 Mar
17;323(11):1061.
[2] WHO. Modes of transmission of virus causing COVID-19: implications for IPC precaution
recommendations [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-
room/commentaries/detail/modes-of-transmission-of-virus-causing-covid-19-implications-for-ipc-
precaution-recommendations
[3] Wang To KK, Tsang OT-Y, Yip CC-Y, Chan K-H, Wu T-C, Chan JM-C, et al. Consistent
Detection of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Saliva. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):8413.
[4] Amtha R, Kanagalingam J. Povidone‐iodine in dental and oral health: a narrative review. J Int Oral
Health 2020;12:407‐12.
[5] Reilly C, Goettl M, Steinmetz M, Nikrad J, Jones RS. Short‐ term effects of povidone iodine and
sodium fluoride therapy on plaque levels and microbiome diversity. Oral Diseases. 22 (2015) 155 - 161.
ISSN: 03875547
Volume 44, Issue 05, October, 2021
1667
[6] Anderson DE. Sivalingam V, Kang AEZ, Ananthanarayanan A, Arumugam H, Jenkins TM, Hadijat
Y Eggers M. Povidone-iodine demonstrates rapid in vitro virucidal activity againts SARS-CoV-2, the virus
causing COVID-19 disease. Infect Dis Ther 2020; Sep; 9(3): 669675. doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00316-3
[7] Hassandarvish P, Tiong V, Sazaly AB, Mohamed NA, Arunugam H, Ananthanarayanan A, Qasuri
M, Hadijat M. Povidone iodine gargle and mouthwash. BDJ 2020; June 228(12):900
[8] Peng X, Xu X, Li Y, Cheng L, Zhou X, Ren B. Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in
dental practice. Int J Oral Sci. 2020; 12: 9. Published online 2020 Mar 3. doi: 10.1038/s41368-020-0075- 9.
[9] Seneviratne CJ, Balan P, Ko KKK, Udawatte NS, Lai D, Ng DHL, Venkatachalam I, Lim KS, Ling
ML, Oon L, Goh BT, Sim SYJ. Efficacy of commercial mouth-rinses on SARS-CoV-2 viral load in saliva:
randomized control trial in Singapore. Infection 2020 Dec 14;1-7. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01563-9
[10] Kariwa H, Fujii N, Takashima I. Inactivation of SARS coronavirus by means of povidone-iodine,
physical conditions and chemical reagents. Dermatology. 2006;212 Suppl 1:119-23.
[11] Kirk-Bayley J, Challacombe S, Sunkaraneni VS, Combes J. The use of Povidone Iodine nasal spray
and mouthwash during the current COVID-19 pandemic may protect healthcare workers and reduce cross
infection. (March 28, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3563092 or
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3563092
[12] Eggers M, Eickmann M, Zorn J. Rapid and Effective Virucidal Activity of Povidone-Iodine
Products Against Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and Modified Vaccinia
Virus Ankara (MVA). Infect Dis Ther. 2015 Dec;4(4):491-501. doi: 10.1007/s40121-015-0091-9. Epub
2015 Sep 28.
[13] Ito H, Ito T, Hikida M, Yashiro J, Otsuka A, Kida H, Otsuki K. Outbreak of highly pathogenic
avian influenza in Japan and anti-influenza virus activity of povidone-iodine products. Dermatology.
2006;212 Suppl 1:115-8.
[14] König B, Reimer K, Fleischer W, König W. Effects of Betaisodona® on Parameters of Host
Defense. Dermatology 1997;195 Supp2: 4248.
[15] Kanagalingam J, Feliciano R, Hah JH, Labib H, Le TA, Lin JC. Practical use of povidone-iodine
antiseptic in the maintenance of oral health and in the prevention and treatment of common oropharyngeal
infections. Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Nov;69(11):1247-56. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12707. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
[16] Ludwig M, Enzenhofer E, Schneider S, Rauch M, Bodenteich A, Neumann K, Prieschl-Grassauer
E, Grassauer A, Lion T, Mueller CA. Efficacy of a carrageenan nasal spray in patients with common cold: a
randomized controlled trial. Respir Res. 2013 Nov 13; 14:124. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-124.
[17] Seguin P1, Tanguy M, Laviolle B, Tirel O, Mallédant Y. Effect of oropharyngeal decontamination
by povidone-iodine on ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with head trauma. Crit Care Med. 2006
May;34(5):1514-9.
[18] WHO. 2018. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2nd ed. World Health
Amtha, et.al, 2021 Teikyo Medical Journal
1668
Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/277399. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO
[19] Rahn R, Schäfer V, Ghahremani M, Gerhardt U: Untersuchung zur Wirksamkeit unterschiedlich
konzentrierter PVP-Jod-Lösungen (Betaisodona) zur Desinfektion der Mundschleimhaut. Zahnärztl Welt
1992; 101: 936-939.
[20] Lachapelle JM. Allergic contact dermatitis from povidone-iodine: A re-evaluation study. Contact
Dermatitis 2005. DOI:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00479. x.
[21] Itagaki A, et al. A trial of Isodine® gargle in the prevention of an influenza epidemic in an
elementary school. Proceedings of the First Asian/Pacific Congress on Antisepsis, edited by S. Selwyn, 1
988: Royal Society of Medicine Services International Congress and Symposium Series No. 129, published
by Royal Society of Medicine Services Limited.
[22] Mady LJ, Kubik MW, Baddour K, Snyderman CH, Rowan NR. Consideration of povidone-iodine
as a public health intervention for COVID-19: Utilization as "Personal Protective Equipment" for frontline
providers exposed in high-risk head and neck and skull base oncology care. Oral Oncol. 2020 Jun; 105:
104724. Published online 2020 Apr 16. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104724
[23] WHO. 2020. WHO Surgical Site Infection Prevention Guidelines.
https://www.who.int/gpsc/appendix8.pdf
[24] Fazekas T, et al. Lessons learned from a double-blind randomisedplacebo-controlled study with a
iota- carrageenannasal spray as medical device in children withacute symptoms of common cold. BMC
Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012, 12:147.
[25] Eccles R, et al. Efficacy and safety of an antiviral Iota-Carrageenan nasal spray: a randomized,
double- blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study in volunteers with early symptoms of the common cold.
Respir Res 11, 108 (2010).
[26] Koenighofer M, et al. Carrageenan nasal spray in virus confirmed common cold: individual patient
data analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2014 Nov 12;9(1):57.
[27] Morokutti-Kurz M, König-Schuster M, Koller C, Graf C, Graf P, Kirchoff N, Reutterer B, Seifert
JM, Unger H, Grassauer A, Prieschl-Grassauer E, Nakowitsch S. The Intranasal Application of Zanamivir
and Carrageenan Is Synergistically Active against Influenza A Virus in the Murine Model. PLoS One.
2015; 10(6): e0128794. Published online 2015 Jun 8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128794
[28] WHO. 2020. Global COVID-19 Clinical Platform Novel coronavirus (COVID-19) Rapid version.
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-ncov-crf.pdf?sfvrsn=84766e69_2
[29] Tadiri CP, Gisinger T, Kautzy-Willer A, Kublickiene K, Herrero MT, Raparelli V, Pilote L, Norris
CM. The influence of sex and gender domains on COVID-19 cases and mortality. CMAJ
2020;192(36):E1041-5.
[30] Gunardi I, Nurina NS, Marcia, Amtha R. Dentist experience influence knowledge and attitude
towards HIV patient in West Jakarta, Indonesia. Oral Dis 2020;26(Suppl.1):127-132.
ISSN: 03875547
Volume 44, Issue 05, October, 2021
1669
DOI:10.1111/odi.13393. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/odi.13393
[31] Peckham H, de Gruijter NM, Raine C, Radziszewska A, Ciurtin C, Wedderburn LR, Rosser EC,
Webb K, Deakin CT. Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and
ITU admission. Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 9;11(1):6317.
[32] Abate BB, Kassie AM, Kassaw MW, Aragie TG, Masresha SA. Sex difference in coronavirus
disease (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2020;10:e040129.
[33] Lan FY, Wei CF, Hsu YT, Christiani DC, Kales SN. Work-related COVID-19 transmission in six
Asian countries/areas: A follow-up study. PLoS One 2020 May 19;15(5):e0233588. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0233588. eCollection 2020.
[34] Surendra H, Elyazar IRF, Djaafara BA, Ekawati LL, Saraswati K, Adrian V, Widyastuti, Oktavia
D, Salama N, Lina RN, Andrianto A, Lestari KD, Burhan E, Shankar AH, Thwaites G, Baird JK, Hamers
RL. Clinical characteristics and mortality associated with COVID-19 in Jakarta, Indonesia: A hospital-
based retrospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Apr; 9: 100108. Published online 2021
Mar 2. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100108
[35] Xu H, Zhong L, Deng J, Peng J, Dan H, Zeng X, et al. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-
nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int J Oral Sci. 2020; 12:8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41368-020-
0074-x.
[36] Challacombe SJ, Sunkaraneni VS, Kirk-Bayley J. Virucidal activity. Br Dent J. 2020; 228(12): 902.
doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-1798-x
[37] Gunardi I, Amtha R. The Importance of The Dentist Patient Relationship in Oral Cancer
Treatment. SDJ 2017:1;17-23. https://trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/dental/article/view/1939/1788
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background Data on COVID-19-related mortality and associated factors from low-resource settings are scarce. This study examined clinical characteristics and factors associated with in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients in Jakarta, Indonesia, from March 2 to July 31, 2020. Methods This retrospective cohort included all hospitalised patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 in 55 hospitals. We extracted demographic and clinical data, including hospital outcomes (discharge or death). We used logistic regression to examine factors associated with mortality. Findings Of 4265 patients with a definitive outcome by July 31, 3768 (88%) were discharged and 497 (12%) died. The median age was 46 years (IQR 32–57), 5% were children, and 31% had >1 comorbidity. Age-specific mortalities were 11% (7/61) for <5 years; 4% (1/23) for 5–9; 2% (3/133) for 10–19; 2% (8/638) for 20–29; 3% (26/755) for 30–39; 7% (61/819) for 40–49; 17% (155/941) for 50–59; 22% (132/611) for 60–69; and 34% (96/284) for ≥70. Risk of death was associated with higher age, male sex; pre-existing hypertension, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease; clinical diagnosis of pneumonia; multiple (>3) symptoms; immediate ICU admission, or intubation. Across all ages, risk of death was higher for patients with >1 comorbidity compared to those without; notably the risk was six-fold increased among patients <50 years (adjusted odds ratio 5.87, 95%CI 3.28–10.52; 27% vs 3% mortality). Interpretation Overall in-hospital mortality was lower than reported in high-income countries, probably due to younger age distribution and fewer comorbidities. Deaths occurred across all ages, with >10% mortality among children <5 years and adults >50 years.
Article
Full-text available
Anecdotal evidence suggests that Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, exhibits differences in morbidity and mortality between sexes. Here, we present a meta-analysis of 3,111,714 reported global cases to demonstrate that, whilst there is no difference in the proportion of males and females with confirmed COVID-19, male patients have almost three times the odds of requiring intensive treatment unit (ITU) admission (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 2.06, 3.92) and higher odds of death (OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.31, 1.47) compared to females. With few exceptions, the sex bias observed in COVID-19 is a worldwide phenomenon. An appreciation of how sex is influencing COVID-19 outcomes will have important implications for clinical management and mitigation strategies for this disease.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To assess the sex difference in the prevalence of COVID-19 confirmed cases. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched for related information. The authors developed a data extraction form on an Excel sheet and the following data from eligible studies were extracted: author, country, sample size, number of female patients and number of male patients. Using STATA V.14 for analysis, the authors pooled the overall prevalence of men and/or women using a random-effect meta-analysis model. The authors examined the heterogeneity in effect size using Q statistics and I2 statistics. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Publication bias was also checked. Participants: Studies on COVID-19 confirmed cases were included. Intervention: Sex (male/female) of COVID-19 confirmed cases was considered. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome was prevalence of COVID-19 among men and women. Results: A total of 57 studies with 221 195 participants were used in the analysis. The pooled prevalence of COVID-19 among men was found to be 55.00 (51.43-56.58, I2=99.5%, p<0.001). Sensitivity analysis showed the findings were not dependent on a single study. Moreover, a funnel plot showed symmetrical distribution. Egger's regression test p value was not significant, which indicates absence of publication bias in both outcomes. Conclusions: The prevalence of symptomatic COVID-19 was found to be higher in men than in women. The high prevalence of smoking and alcohol consumption contributed to the high prevalence of COVID-19 among men. Additional studies on the discrepancies in severity and mortality rate due to COVID-19 among men and women and the associated factors are recommended.
Article
Full-text available
Objective There is limited evidence of work-related transmission in the emerging coronaviral pandemic. We aimed to identify high-risk occupations for early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) local transmission. Methods In this observational study, we extracted confirmed COVID-19 cases from governmental investigation reports in Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. We followed each country/area for 40 days after its first locally transmitted case, and excluded all imported cases. We defined a possible work-related case as a worker with evidence of close contact with another confirmed case due to work, or an unknown contact history but likely to be infected in the working environment (e.g. an airport taxi driver). We calculated the case number for each occupation, and illustrated the temporal distribution of all possible work-related cases and healthcare worker (HCW) cases. The temporal distribution was further defined as early outbreak (the earliest 10 days of the following period) and late outbreak (11th to 40th days of the following period). Results We identified 103 possible work-related cases (14.9%) among a total of 690 local transmissions. The five occupation groups with the most cases were healthcare workers (HCWs) (22%), drivers and transport workers (18%), services and sales workers (18%), cleaning and domestic workers (9%) and public safety workers (7%). Possible work-related transmission played a substantial role in early outbreak (47.7% of early cases). Occupations at risk varied from early outbreak (predominantly services and sales workers, drivers, construction laborers, and religious professionals) to late outbreak (predominantly HCWs, drivers, cleaning and domestic workers, police officers, and religious professionals). Conclusions Work-related transmission is considerable in early COVID-19 outbreaks, and the elevated risk of infection was not limited to HCW. Implementing preventive/surveillance strategies for high-risk working populations is warranted.
Article
Full-text available
A novel β-coronavirus (2019-nCoV) caused severe and even fetal pneumonia explored in a seafood market of Wuhan city, Hubei province, China, and rapidly spread to other provinces of China and other countries. The 2019-nCoV was different from SARS-CoV, but shared the same host receptor the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The natural host of 2019-nCoV may be the bat Rhinolophus affinis as 2019-nCoV showed 96.2% of whole-genome identity to BatCoV RaTG13. The person-to-person transmission routes of 2019-nCoV included direct transmission, such as cough, sneeze, droplet inhalation transmission, and contact transmission, such as the contact with oral, nasal, and eye mucous membranes. 2019-nCoV can also be transmitted through the saliva, and the fetal–oral routes may also be a potential person-to-person transmission route. The participants in dental practice expose to tremendous risk of 2019-nCoV infection due to the face-to-face communication and the exposure to saliva, blood, and other body fluids, and the handling of sharp instruments. Dental professionals play great roles in preventing the transmission of 2019-nCoV. Here we recommend the infection control measures during dental practice to block the person-to-person transmission routes in dental clinics and hospitals.
Article
Aim: Proper oral care is an important contributor to overall health, and various antiseptic options are available for the prevention and treatment of oral diseases. Povidone-iodine (PVP-I) oral formulations remain popular for their broad spectrum of effect and favorable tolerability profile. Our aim was to provide a narrative review looking at the past and current studies evaluating PVP-I usage for the maintenance of oral health. Materials and Methods: Querying the PubMed and Web of Science databases using the terms 'PVP-I,' 'Oral Health,' and 'Dental Care,' we identified and systematically reviewed articles for a literature review of PVP-I applications in the area. In addition to potent antimicrobial action against common viruses, fungi, and bacteria, the absence of reported resistance to PVP-I makes it an increasingly attractive option in today's settings. Results: The applications for PVP-I range from routine oral care and gingivitis through to the management of oral mucositis and surgical site disinfection following dental surgeries. Evidence also suggests that PVP-I confers additional benefits that complement its antiseptic properties. These include anti-inflammatory, anti-edematous, and hemostyptic effects, which can improve clinical outcomes. Conclusion: The clinical benefits of PVP-I warrant its ongoing consideration as a reliable antiseptic for broad oral care needs. © 2020 Journal of International Oral Health | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.