Content uploaded by Tahsin Mehdi
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Tahsin Mehdi on Oct 29, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Catalogue no. 36-28-0001
ISSN 2563-8955
by Tahsin Mehdi and René Morissette
Working from home in Canada:
What have we learned so far?
Release date: October 27, 2021
Economic and Social Reports
How to obtain more information
For information about this product or the wide range of services and data available from Statistics Canada, visit our website,
www.statcan.gc.ca.
You can also contact us by
Email at STATCAN.infostats-infostats.STATCAN@canada.ca
Telephone, from Monday to Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., at the following numbers:
•Statistical Information Service 1-800-263-1136
•National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1-800-363-7629
•Fax line 1-514-283-9350
Depository Services Program
•Inquiries line 1-800-635-7943
•Fax line 1-800-565-7757
Note of appreciation
Canada owes the success of its statistical system to a
long-standing partnership between Statistics Canada, the
citizens of Canada, its businesses, governments and other
institutions. Accurate and timely statistical information
could not be produced without their continued co-operation
and goodwill.
Standards of service to the public
Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt,
reliable and courteous manner. To this end, Statistics Canada
has developed standards of service that its employees observe.
To obtain a copy of these service standards, please contact
Statistics Canada toll-free at 1-800-263-1136. The service
standards are also published on www.statcan.gc.ca under
“Contact us” > “Standards of service to the public.”
Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Industry, 2021
All rights reserved. Use of this publication is governed by the Statistics Canada Open Licence Agreement.
An HTML version is also available.
Cette publication est aussi disponible en français.
Statistics Canada 1 Economic and Social Reports
Catalogue no. 362800001 Vol. 1, Issue 10, October 2020
Working from home in Canada: What have
we learned so far?
by Tahsin Mehdi and René Morissette
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25318/36280001202101000001-eng
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, Statistics Canada has produced several studies on
working from home. This article synthesizes the key findings of these studies, provides an international
perspective and identifies questions for future research.
Roughly 40% of Canadian jobs can be done from home
In the context of a pandemic, telework feasibility (i.e., the degree to which Canadians hold jobs that can
be done from home) is an important parameter. Deng, Messacar and Morissette (2020) apply the
methodology of Dingel and Neiman (2020) to the 2019 Labour Force Survey data and estimate that 39%
of Canadian workers hold jobs that can plausibly be carried out from home.
The feasibility of working from home varies substantially across wage deciles, education levels,
industries and regions
The degree to which Canadians hold jobs that can be done from home varies substantially across several
dimensions. Almost 6 in 10 workers with a bachelor’s degree or higher education (59%) can work from
home, compared with 10% of their counterparts with no high school diploma (Deng, Messacar and
Morissette 2020).1 Of the dual-earner salaried couples who are in the top decile of the family earnings
distribution, 54% hold jobs in which both spouses can work from home. The corresponding percentage
for dual-earner salaried couples in the bottom decile is 8% (Messacar, Morissette and Deng 2020).
The degree to which Canadians can work from home also varies substantially across industries. For
example, about 85% of workers in finance and insurance, or in professional, scientific and technical
services can potentially work from home (Deng, Messacar and Morissette 2020). In contrast, less than 1
in 10 workers in accommodation and food services (6%) can do so.
Since different regions have different industrial structures, these numbers explain partly why telework
feasibility varies across regions. Because office jobs are generally concentrated in large cities, they tend
to have greater proportions of jobs that can be done from home than smaller communities (Morissette,
Deng and Messacar 2021).
1. Telework feasibility is higher for women (46%) than for men (32%) and for workers aged 25 and older than for younger
workers.
Spotlight on data and research Working from home in Canada: What have we learned so far?
Statistics Canada 2 Economic and Social Reports
Catalogue no. 362800001 Vol. 1, Issue 10, October 2020
The feasibility of working from home predicted well the degree to which Canadians worked from
home during the pandemic
The indicator of the feasibility of working from home developed by Dingel and Neiman (2020) is a good
predictor of the degree to which Canadians actually worked from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.
It is in line with the maximum amount of work from home that has been observed since the beginning of
the pandemic. In April 2020, about 40% of employees worked most of their hours from home, compared
with 4% in 2016 and 23% in August 2021 (Chart 1). The indicator of feasibility also predicts well group-
level differences in the amount of work from home. Specifically, groups of workers—defined by wage
deciles, education, industry or region—who held jobs conducive to telework ended up working from home
to a greater extent than other workers from April 2020 to June 2021. For example, roughly 70% of workers
in finance and insurance or in professional, scientific and technical services worked most of their hours
from home during that period (Statistics Canada 2021). In contrast, 5% of workers in accommodation
and food services did so.2
New teleworkers favourably assess productivity and report strong preferences for working from
home
Mehdi and Morissette (2021a) analyzed new teleworkers (i.e., employees who usually worked outside
the home prior to the COVID-19 pandemic but switched to telework during the pandemic) who had been
with the same employer at least one year prior to the beginning of the economic shutdown announced in
mid-March 2020. Most of these workers (90%) reported being at least as productive at home as they
were previously on the business premises. Mehdi and Morissette also found that 80% of them would like
to work at least half of their hours from home once the COVID-19 pandemic is over. Mehdi and Morissette
(2021b) estimate that once the COVID-19 pandemic is over, the hours that Canadian employees would
prefer working from home might amount, in the aggregate, to 24% of their total work hours. This estimate,
which accounts only for worker preferences and does not incorporate employer preferences, equals
almost five times the overall share of total hours worked from home observed in 2016 or 2018.
Increases in the proportions of Canadians working from home could potentially reduce
greenhouse gas emissions due to commuting
By reducing the amount of commuting, working from home could potentially reduce the demand for public
transit and greenhouse gas emissions. Morissette, Deng and Messacar (2021) estimate that a transition
to full telework capacity—a situation in which all workers who can plausibly work from home would work
all of their hours from home—could, through reduced commuting, lead to a reduction in annual emissions
of greenhouse gases of about 8.6 megatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent in Canada. This represents
6.0% of the direct greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian households in 2015, and 11.0% of their
emissions attributable to transportation that year.
An increased feasibility of working from home may increase job security in future pandemics
In addition to its potential impact on productivity, public transit and greenhouse gas emissions, working
from home might insulate workers from work interruptions during future pandemics, and, thus, might
increase their job security during such periods. Frenette and Morissette (2021) define a new concept of
job security that focuses on triple-protected jobs. These are jobs that (a) have no predetermined end
date, (b) have a low risk of automation and (c) are resilient to pandemics. Jobs that are resilient to
2. When two-digit industries are used, cross-industry differences in telework feasibility account for 77% of the cross-industry
differences in actual rates of work from home during that period. When 66 economic regions in the 10 provinces are
considered, cross-regional differences in telework feasibility account for 86% of the cross-regional differences in actual rates
of work from home.
Spotlight on data and research Working from home in Canada: What have we learned so far?
Statistics Canada 3 Economic and Social Reports
Catalogue no. 362800001 Vol. 1, Issue 10, October 2020
pandemics can be done from home, provide essential services or involve sufficient physical distancing.
The likelihood of holding triple-protected jobs, like the feasibility of working from home, varies
substantially across wage deciles, education levels and regions. For example, 9% of employees in the
bottom decile of the wage distribution held triple-protected jobs in 2019, compared with 87% of
employees in the top decile.
International comparisons
Much like in Canada, working from home is a relatively new experience for many employees around the
world. While 39% of Canadian workers hold jobs that can plausibly be done from home, the
corresponding estimates equal 37% for the United States and Germany, 38% for France, 35% for Italy,
and 44% for the United Kingdom (Dingel and Neiman 2020). The percentages of workers who can work
from home are substantially lower in countries such as Brazil (26%), Chile (26%) and Mexico (22%). The
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) found that all of its member countries
experienced increased rates of work from home during the pandemic (OECD 2021a). Working from home
was most prevalent in knowledge-intensive sectors and least prevalent in manufacturing (OECD 2021b).
COVID-19 has accelerated the acceptance of working from home around the world. The sustainability of
working from home hinges not on only employees’ productivity and preferences for working from home,
but also on how employers feel about it. To assess this issue, Criscuolo et al. (2021) conducted an OECD
survey of thousands of firms across 25 countries. They found that 90% of workers expressed a preference
for doing more of their work from home in the future. Managers, meanwhile, expected around 60% of
their workforce to do more of their work from home, with two to three days per week being the modal
preference for working from home. Relatedly, as of August 2020, about 60% of Canadian employers
expected a portion of their workforce to perform some work from home after the pandemic (OECD 2021a).
Across the OECD, over 60% of managers saw increases in worker productivity as an advantage of
working from home, while more than 75% expressed the main disadvantage of working from home as
being the difficulty of teamwork.
Questions for future research
Several questions about working from home remain unanswered. One issue is the degree to which the
preferences of Canadian workers for working from home and the preferences of their employers align. In
addition, the extent of this alignment or misalignment may vary across industries and groups of workers.
A second issue is the degree to which demand for public transit and office space will fall in Canada as a
result of increased telework once the COVID-19 pandemic is over. The degree to which employers will
use working from home as a tool to attract and retain talented workers also remains to be seen.
Spotlight on data and research Working from home in Canada: What have we learned so far?
Statistics Canada 4 Economic and Social Reports
Catalogue no. 362800001 Vol. 1, Issue 10, October 2020
Authors:
Tahsin Mehdi and René Morissette are with the Social Analysis and Modelling Division at Statistics
Canada.
References
Criscuolo, C., P. Gal, T. Leidecker, F. Losma, and G. Nicoletti. 2021. “Telework after COVID-19: Survey
evidence from managers and workers on implications for productivity and well-being.” OECD Global
Forum on Productivity.
Deng, Z., D. Messacar, and R. Morissette. 2020. Running the Economy Remotely: Potential for Working
from Home During and After COVID-19. StatCan COVID-19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada, no.
26. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 45280001. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Dingel, J.I., and B. Neiman. 2020. How Many Jobs Can Be Done at Home? National Bureau of Economic
Research working paper no. 26948. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Frenette, M., and R. Morissette. 2021. “Job security in the age of artificial intelligence and potential
pandemics.” Economic and Social Reports 1 (6). Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 36-28-0001.
Mehdi, T., and R. Morissette. 2021a. Working from Home: Productivity and Preferences. StatCan COVID-
19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada, no. 12. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 45280001. Ottawa:
Statistics Canada.
Spotlight on data and research Working from home in Canada: What have we learned so far?
Statistics Canada 5 Economic and Social Reports
Catalogue no. 362800001 Vol. 1, Issue 10, October 2020
Mehdi, T., and R. Morissette. 2021b. “Working from home after the COVID-19 pandemic: An estimate of
worker preferences.” Economic and Social Reports 1 (5). Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 36-28-0001.
Messacar, D., R. Morissette, and Z. Deng. 2020. Inequality in the Feasibility of Working from Home
During and After COVID-19. StatCan COVID19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada. Statistics Canada
Catalogue no. 45280001.
Morissette, R., Z. Deng, and D. Messacar. 2021. “Working from home: Potential implications for public
transit and greenhouse gas emissions.” Economic and Social Reports 1 (4). Statistics Canada Catalogue
no. 36-28-0001.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2021a. Measuring Telework in the
COVID-19 Pandemic. OECD Digital Economy Papers, no. 314. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2021b. “Productivity gains from
teleworking in the post COVID-19 era: How can public policies make it happen?” OECD Policy
Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Statistics Canada. 2021. “Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: April 2020 to June 2021.”
The Daily. August 4. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 11-001-X. Available at:
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/210804/dq210804b-eng.htm.