ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, Statistics Canada has produced several studies on working from home. This article synthesizes the key findings of these studies, provides an international perspective and identifies questions for future research.
Catalogue no. 36-28-0001
ISSN 2563-8955
by Tahsin Mehdi and René Morissette
Working from home in Canada:
What have we learned so far?
Release date: October 27, 2021
Economic and Social Reports
How to obtain more information
For information about this product or the wide range of services and data available from Statistics Canada, visit our website,
www.statcan.gc.ca.
You can also contact us by
Email at STATCAN.infostats-infostats.STATCAN@canada.ca
Telephone, from Monday to Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., at the following numbers:
Statistical Information Service 1-800-263-1136
National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1-800-363-7629
Fax line 1-514-283-9350
Depository Services Program
Inquiries line 1-800-635-7943
Fax line 1-800-565-7757
Note of appreciation
Canada owes the success of its statistical system to a
long-standing partnership between Statistics Canada, the
citizens of Canada, its businesses, governments and other
institutions. Accurate and timely statistical information
could not be produced without their continued co-operation
and goodwill.
Standards of service to the public
Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt,
reliable and courteous manner. To this end, Statistics Canada
has developed standards of service that its employees observe.
To obtain a copy of these service standards, please contact
Statistics Canada toll-free at 1-800-263-1136. The service
standards are also published on www.statcan.gc.ca under
“Contact us” > “Standards of service to the public.”
Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Industry, 2021
All rights reserved. Use of this publication is governed by the Statistics Canada Open Licence Agreement.
An HTML version is also available.
Cette publication est aussi disponible en français.
Statistics Canada 1 Economic and Social Reports
Catalogue no. 362800001 Vol. 1, Issue 10, October 2020
Working from home in Canada: What have
we learned so far?
by Tahsin Mehdi and René Morissette
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25318/36280001202101000001-eng
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, Statistics Canada has produced several studies on
working from home. This article synthesizes the key findings of these studies, provides an international
perspective and identifies questions for future research.
Roughly 40% of Canadian jobs can be done from home
In the context of a pandemic, telework feasibility (i.e., the degree to which Canadians hold jobs that can
be done from home) is an important parameter. Deng, Messacar and Morissette (2020) apply the
methodology of Dingel and Neiman (2020) to the 2019 Labour Force Survey data and estimate that 39%
of Canadian workers hold jobs that can plausibly be carried out from home.
The feasibility of working from home varies substantially across wage deciles, education levels,
industries and regions
The degree to which Canadians hold jobs that can be done from home varies substantially across several
dimensions. Almost 6 in 10 workers with a bachelor’s degree or higher education (59%) can work from
home, compared with 10% of their counterparts with no high school diploma (Deng, Messacar and
Morissette 2020).1 Of the dual-earner salaried couples who are in the top decile of the family earnings
distribution, 54% hold jobs in which both spouses can work from home. The corresponding percentage
for dual-earner salaried couples in the bottom decile is 8% (Messacar, Morissette and Deng 2020).
The degree to which Canadians can work from home also varies substantially across industries. For
example, about 85% of workers in finance and insurance, or in professional, scientific and technical
services can potentially work from home (Deng, Messacar and Morissette 2020). In contrast, less than 1
in 10 workers in accommodation and food services (6%) can do so.
Since different regions have different industrial structures, these numbers explain partly why telework
feasibility varies across regions. Because office jobs are generally concentrated in large cities, they tend
to have greater proportions of jobs that can be done from home than smaller communities (Morissette,
Deng and Messacar 2021).
1. Telework feasibility is higher for women (46%) than for men (32%) and for workers aged 25 and older than for younger
workers.
Spotlight on data and research Working from home in Canada: What have we learned so far?
Statistics Canada 2 Economic and Social Reports
Catalogue no. 362800001 Vol. 1, Issue 10, October 2020
The feasibility of working from home predicted well the degree to which Canadians worked from
home during the pandemic
The indicator of the feasibility of working from home developed by Dingel and Neiman (2020) is a good
predictor of the degree to which Canadians actually worked from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.
It is in line with the maximum amount of work from home that has been observed since the beginning of
the pandemic. In April 2020, about 40% of employees worked most of their hours from home, compared
with 4% in 2016 and 23% in August 2021 (Chart 1). The indicator of feasibility also predicts well group-
level differences in the amount of work from home. Specifically, groups of workers—defined by wage
deciles, education, industry or region—who held jobs conducive to telework ended up working from home
to a greater extent than other workers from April 2020 to June 2021. For example, roughly 70% of workers
in finance and insurance or in professional, scientific and technical services worked most of their hours
from home during that period (Statistics Canada 2021). In contrast, 5% of workers in accommodation
and food services did so.2
New teleworkers favourably assess productivity and report strong preferences for working from
home
Mehdi and Morissette (2021a) analyzed new teleworkers (i.e., employees who usually worked outside
the home prior to the COVID-19 pandemic but switched to telework during the pandemic) who had been
with the same employer at least one year prior to the beginning of the economic shutdown announced in
mid-March 2020. Most of these workers (90%) reported being at least as productive at home as they
were previously on the business premises. Mehdi and Morissette also found that 80% of them would like
to work at least half of their hours from home once the COVID-19 pandemic is over. Mehdi and Morissette
(2021b) estimate that once the COVID-19 pandemic is over, the hours that Canadian employees would
prefer working from home might amount, in the aggregate, to 24% of their total work hours. This estimate,
which accounts only for worker preferences and does not incorporate employer preferences, equals
almost five times the overall share of total hours worked from home observed in 2016 or 2018.
Increases in the proportions of Canadians working from home could potentially reduce
greenhouse gas emissions due to commuting
By reducing the amount of commuting, working from home could potentially reduce the demand for public
transit and greenhouse gas emissions. Morissette, Deng and Messacar (2021) estimate that a transition
to full telework capacity—a situation in which all workers who can plausibly work from home would work
all of their hours from home—could, through reduced commuting, lead to a reduction in annual emissions
of greenhouse gases of about 8.6 megatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent in Canada. This represents
6.0% of the direct greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian households in 2015, and 11.0% of their
emissions attributable to transportation that year.
An increased feasibility of working from home may increase job security in future pandemics
In addition to its potential impact on productivity, public transit and greenhouse gas emissions, working
from home might insulate workers from work interruptions during future pandemics, and, thus, might
increase their job security during such periods. Frenette and Morissette (2021) define a new concept of
job security that focuses on triple-protected jobs. These are jobs that (a) have no predetermined end
date, (b) have a low risk of automation and (c) are resilient to pandemics. Jobs that are resilient to
2. When two-digit industries are used, cross-industry differences in telework feasibility account for 77% of the cross-industry
differences in actual rates of work from home during that period. When 66 economic regions in the 10 provinces are
considered, cross-regional differences in telework feasibility account for 86% of the cross-regional differences in actual rates
of work from home.
Spotlight on data and research Working from home in Canada: What have we learned so far?
Statistics Canada 3 Economic and Social Reports
Catalogue no. 362800001 Vol. 1, Issue 10, October 2020
pandemics can be done from home, provide essential services or involve sufficient physical distancing.
The likelihood of holding triple-protected jobs, like the feasibility of working from home, varies
substantially across wage deciles, education levels and regions. For example, 9% of employees in the
bottom decile of the wage distribution held triple-protected jobs in 2019, compared with 87% of
employees in the top decile.
International comparisons
Much like in Canada, working from home is a relatively new experience for many employees around the
world. While 39% of Canadian workers hold jobs that can plausibly be done from home, the
corresponding estimates equal 37% for the United States and Germany, 38% for France, 35% for Italy,
and 44% for the United Kingdom (Dingel and Neiman 2020). The percentages of workers who can work
from home are substantially lower in countries such as Brazil (26%), Chile (26%) and Mexico (22%). The
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) found that all of its member countries
experienced increased rates of work from home during the pandemic (OECD 2021a). Working from home
was most prevalent in knowledge-intensive sectors and least prevalent in manufacturing (OECD 2021b).
COVID-19 has accelerated the acceptance of working from home around the world. The sustainability of
working from home hinges not on only employees’ productivity and preferences for working from home,
but also on how employers feel about it. To assess this issue, Criscuolo et al. (2021) conducted an OECD
survey of thousands of firms across 25 countries. They found that 90% of workers expressed a preference
for doing more of their work from home in the future. Managers, meanwhile, expected around 60% of
their workforce to do more of their work from home, with two to three days per week being the modal
preference for working from home. Relatedly, as of August 2020, about 60% of Canadian employers
expected a portion of their workforce to perform some work from home after the pandemic (OECD 2021a).
Across the OECD, over 60% of managers saw increases in worker productivity as an advantage of
working from home, while more than 75% expressed the main disadvantage of working from home as
being the difficulty of teamwork.
Questions for future research
Several questions about working from home remain unanswered. One issue is the degree to which the
preferences of Canadian workers for working from home and the preferences of their employers align. In
addition, the extent of this alignment or misalignment may vary across industries and groups of workers.
A second issue is the degree to which demand for public transit and office space will fall in Canada as a
result of increased telework once the COVID-19 pandemic is over. The degree to which employers will
use working from home as a tool to attract and retain talented workers also remains to be seen.
Spotlight on data and research Working from home in Canada: What have we learned so far?
Statistics Canada 4 Economic and Social Reports
Catalogue no. 362800001 Vol. 1, Issue 10, October 2020
Authors:
Tahsin Mehdi and René Morissette are with the Social Analysis and Modelling Division at Statistics
Canada.
References
Criscuolo, C., P. Gal, T. Leidecker, F. Losma, and G. Nicoletti. 2021. “Telework after COVID-19: Survey
evidence from managers and workers on implications for productivity and well-being.” OECD Global
Forum on Productivity.
Deng, Z., D. Messacar, and R. Morissette. 2020. Running the Economy Remotely: Potential for Working
from Home During and After COVID-19. StatCan COVID-19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada, no.
26. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 45280001. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Dingel, J.I., and B. Neiman. 2020. How Many Jobs Can Be Done at Home? National Bureau of Economic
Research working paper no. 26948. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Frenette, M., and R. Morissette. 2021. “Job security in the age of artificial intelligence and potential
pandemics.” Economic and Social Reports 1 (6). Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 36-28-0001.
Mehdi, T., and R. Morissette. 2021a. Working from Home: Productivity and Preferences. StatCan COVID-
19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada, no. 12. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 45280001. Ottawa:
Statistics Canada.
Spotlight on data and research Working from home in Canada: What have we learned so far?
Statistics Canada 5 Economic and Social Reports
Catalogue no. 362800001 Vol. 1, Issue 10, October 2020
Mehdi, T., and R. Morissette. 2021b. “Working from home after the COVID-19 pandemic: An estimate of
worker preferences.” Economic and Social Reports 1 (5). Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 36-28-0001.
Messacar, D., R. Morissette, and Z. Deng. 2020. Inequality in the Feasibility of Working from Home
During and After COVID-19. StatCan COVID19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada. Statistics Canada
Catalogue no. 45280001.
Morissette, R., Z. Deng, and D. Messacar. 2021. “Working from home: Potential implications for public
transit and greenhouse gas emissions.” Economic and Social Reports 1 (4). Statistics Canada Catalogue
no. 36-28-0001.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2021a. Measuring Telework in the
COVID-19 Pandemic. OECD Digital Economy Papers, no. 314. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2021b. “Productivity gains from
teleworking in the post COVID-19 era: How can public policies make it happen?” OECD Policy
Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Statistics Canada. 2021. “Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: April 2020 to June 2021.”
The Daily. August 4. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 11-001-X. Available at:
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/210804/dq210804b-eng.htm.
... Our study found that many workers living with mental/ cognitive conditions causing disability, as well as respondents who identify are employed in female-dominant occupations, reported unmet accommodation needs related to flexibility of work and being able to modify the work environment. However, after examining the work context and job conditions, the findings suggested that these differences professional, scientific, or technical services and those that allow the least amount of work from home flexibility tend to be in the service industries [64]. Women and people living with mental/cognitive conditions, which are the populations most in need of this accommodation, tend to be underrepresented in the former industries and overrepresented in the latter industries [65,66]. ...
... This is consistent with prior research conducted on individuals living with physically disabling conditions [16]. While flexibility in work schedule has increased in recent years, mostly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and work from home arrangements [63], it is estimated that only approximately 40% of Canadian jobs can feasibly be done from home [64]. Additionally, jobs that allow the most work from home flexibility tend to be in industries such as finance, insurance, Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. ...
Article
Full-text available
Workplace support needs for women and men living with mental health conditions are not well understood. This study examined workplace accommodation and support needs among women and men with and without mental health or cognitive conditions and individual and workplace factors associated with having unmet needs. A cross-sectional survey of 3068 Canadian workers collected information on disability, gender, gendered occupations, job conditions, work contexts, and workplace accommodations. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined gender- and disability-based differences in unmet needs for workplace flexibility, work modifications, and health benefits, and the association of work context (i.e., work schedule, job sector) and job conditions (i.e., precarious work) on the likelihood of unmet accommodation needs. The additive (i.e., super- or sub-additive) and multiplicative effects of disability, gender, and occupational gender distribution on the probability of unmet accommodation needs were also assessed. The most common unmet workplace accommodation was work modifications reported by 35.9% of respondents with mental/cognitive disability and workplace flexibility reported by 19.6% of individuals without a mental/cognitive disability. Women, employees in female dominant occupations, and participants with mental/cognitive disabilities were more likely to report unmet needs compared with men, employees in non-female dominant occupations, and participants without disabilities but these findings were largely explained by differences in job conditions and work contexts. No interacting effects on the likelihood of reporting unmet needs for workplace accommodations were observed. To support employee mental health, attention is needed to address work contexts and job conditions, especially for people working with mental/cognitive disabilities, women, and workers in female-dominated occupations where unmet accommodation needs are greatest.
... In April 2020, the proportion of employees who predominantly worked from home in Canada reached approximately 40%, a significant increase compared to 4% in 2016 [1], while this proportion had fallen to about 20% by November 2023 [2]. In a research study [3] using the "Future Mobility in Canada Survey" conducted in October and November of 2021, it was discovered that approximately 18% of 3403 respondents tended to telework five days a week and about 39% wished to telework at least one day a week. ...
... The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant increases in working from home (see, e.g., Mehdi and Morissette [2021a] or Mehdi and Morissette [2021b]). These jobs are usually held by highly educated employees who may be more exposed to AI-related job transformation than their less educated counterparts. ...
Article
Full-text available
Past studies on technological change have suggested that occupations involving routine and manual tasks will face a higher risk of automation-related job transformation. However, recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) challenge prior conclusions, as AI is increasingly able to perform non-routine and cognitive tasks. These advances have the potential to affect a broader segment of the labour force than previously thought. This study provides experimental estimates of the number and percentage of workers in Canada potentially susceptible to AI-related job transformation based on the complementarity-adjusted AI occupational exposure index of Pizzinelli et al. (2023), inspired by Felten, Raj and Seamans (2021). Results from the 2016 and 2021 censuses of population suggest that, on average, about 60% of employees in Canada could be exposed to AI-related job transformation, and about half of this group are in jobs that may be highly complementary with AI. Unlike previous waves of automation, which mainly transformed the jobs of less educated employees, AI is more likely to transform the jobs of highly educated employees. Despite facing potentially higher exposure to AI-related job transformation, highly educated employees may be in jobs that could benefit from AI technologies. Compared with employees in other industries, exposure to AI-related job transformation is higher for employees in professional, scientific and technical services; finance and insurance; information and cultural industries; educational services; and health care and social assistance. However, education and health care professionals are more likely to be in jobs that are highly complementary with AI. Employees in industries such as construction, and accommodation and food services face relatively lower exposure to AI-related job transformation. Whether occupations that may benefit from AI will experience relatively higher employment and wage growth remains to be seen, as this depends on factors such as firm productivity and the ability of workers in those occupations to leverage the potential benefits of AI.
... The feasibility of teleworking varies substantially. Past research in Canada shows that women, prime working-age individuals (from 25 to 54 years old), more educated groups, higher-earning households, and certain racialized groups have a higher propensity to work from home (Mehdi & Morissette, 2021b;Clarke & Hardy, 2022;Statistics Canada, 2024a). Working from home is also more common for those who work full-time as well as in certain regions, especially in larger cities. ...
Article
Full-text available
In response to COVID-19 social distancing restrictions, digitally delivered health interventions present as a potential solution for maintaining or improving individuals’ physical activity. This study explored the feasibility of a web-based intervention, informed by the multi-process action control (M-PAC) framework to promote PA among individuals affected by social distancing. Fifty adults self-reporting as insufficiently active were randomized to a 6-week web-intervention (n = 27) or wait-list control (n = 23). Primary feasibility outcomes included recruitment and retention rates and usability and satisfaction scores; secondary outcomes of MVPA and M-PAC constructs and tertiary outcomes of mental health and wellbeing were also assessed. Overall, feasibility of the intervention was high, with a 96% recruitment rate, 84% retention rate, high satisfaction and usability scores, and comparable website usage to similar eHealth interventions. Intervention participants trended towards improved MVPA and M-PAC constructs and outcomes of mental health and wellbeing. Findings suggest study extension to a full-scale RCT.
Chapter
Post-pandemic, there has been an exponential growth in the adoption of remote work and remote learning. Recent years have marked a significant growth in technologies to assist humanity in integrating effortlessly into the virtual world. Communication tools such as Zoom, Teams, and Slack have become essential tools everybody must be comfortable working on. Digital literacy has become a vital skill any worker requires to sustain their job. For remote work and learning, there is an increased emphasis on soft skills such as time management, collaboration, communication, and perseverance. One must be self-directed and disciplined to succeed in a less supervised environment. Overall, technologies have transformed how we work and learn, and it will be interesting to witness how they will continue evolving in the coming years.
Article
Full-text available
Results indicate that once the COVID-19 pandemic is over, Canadian employees might prefer working around 24% of their hours from home. In 2016 and 2018, employees worked no more than 5% of their total hours from home. Therefore, the overall share of total hours that employees might prefer working from home once the pandemic ends equals almost five times the overall share of total hours they worked from home prior to COVID-19.
Article
Evaluating the economic impact of “social distancing” measures taken to arrest the spread of COVID-19 raises a fundamental question about the modern economy: how many jobs can be performed at home? We classify the feasibility of working at home for all occupations and merge this classification with occupational employment counts. We find that 37% of jobs in the United States can be performed entirely at home, with significant variation across cities and industries. These jobs typically pay more than jobs that cannot be done at home and account for 46% of all US wages. Applying our occupational classification to 85 other countries reveals that lower-income economies have a lower share of jobs that can be done at home.
Telework after COVID-19: Survey evidence from managers and workers on implications for productivity and well-being
  • C Criscuolo
  • P Gal
  • T Leidecker
  • F Losma
  • G Nicoletti
Criscuolo, C., P. Gal, T. Leidecker, F. Losma, and G. Nicoletti. 2021. "Telework after COVID-19: Survey evidence from managers and workers on implications for productivity and well-being." OECD Global Forum on Productivity.
Running the Economy Remotely: Potential for Working from Home During and After COVID-19. StatCan COVID-19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada
  • Z Deng
  • D Messacar
  • R Morissette
Deng, Z., D. Messacar, and R. Morissette. 2020. Running the Economy Remotely: Potential for Working from Home During and After COVID-19. StatCan COVID-19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada, no.
Job security in the age of artificial intelligence and potential pandemics
  • M Frenette
  • R Morissette
Frenette, M., and R. Morissette. 2021. "Job security in the age of artificial intelligence and potential pandemics." Economic and Social Reports 1 (6). Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 36-28-0001.
Working from Home: Productivity and Preferences. StatCan COVID-19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada
  • T Mehdi
  • R Morissette
Mehdi, T., and R. Morissette. 2021a. Working from Home: Productivity and Preferences. StatCan COVID-19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada, no. 12. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 45280001. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Economic and Social Reports Catalogue no. 362800001
Inequality in the Feasibility of Working from Home During and After COVID-19. StatCan COVID19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada
  • D Messacar
  • R Morissette
  • Z Deng
Messacar, D., R. Morissette, and Z. Deng. 2020. Inequality in the Feasibility of Working from Home During and After COVID-19. StatCan COVID19: Data to Insights for a Better Canada. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 45280001.
Working from home: Potential implications for public transit and greenhouse gas emissions
  • R Morissette
  • Z Deng
  • D Messacar
Morissette, R., Z. Deng, and D. Messacar. 2021. "Working from home: Potential implications for public transit and greenhouse gas emissions." Economic and Social Reports 1 (4). Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 36-28-0001.
Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic
Statistics Canada. 2021. "Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: April 2020 to June 2021." The Daily. August 4. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 11-001-X. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/210804/dq210804b-eng.htm.