ArticlePDF Available


Although Joe Ushie’s poetry has received critical attention, studies focus mainly on the socio-political and ecological issues prevalent in the poems. Our paper is interested in the way Ushie uses the idea of human-animal metamorphosis and animal symbolism in expressing his ecological and socio-political concerns, personal vision, and other forms of activism. Animals have particular importance in the African socio-cultural context, and there are many instances of human-animal transformation or animal symbolism in oral traditions. We argue that Ushie draws from this paradigm in the adoption of animals in his poetry and poetics. Our close reading of Ushie’s Popular Stand and Other Poems and Lambs at the Shrine reveals the use of animals as symbols in the advocacy for ecological preservation and balance and the characterisation of humans as animals or vice versa as a form of satire against political leaders and oppressors. The archetypal significance of the animals represented in the selected poems reflects Ushie’s vision, and through their symbolism, issues bordering on socio-political malaise and environmentalism are foregrounded.
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
Cogent Arts & Humanities
ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage:
Animal symbolism in the poetry of Joe Ushie
Mathias Iroro Orhero & Friday Akpan Okon |
To cite this article: Mathias Iroro Orhero & Friday Akpan Okon | (2021) Animal
symbolism in the poetry of Joe Ushie, Cogent Arts & Humanities, 8:1, 1992084, DOI:
To link to this article:
© 2021 The Author(s). This open access
article is distributed under a Creative
Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
Published online: 24 Oct 2021.
Submit your article to this journal
View related articles
View Crossmark data
Animal symbolism in the poetry of Joe Ushie
Mathias Iroro Orhero
* and Friday Akpan Okon
Abstract: Although Joe Ushie’s poetry has received critical attention, studies focus
mainly on the socio-political and ecological issues prevalent in the poems. Our
paper is interested in the way Ushie uses the idea of human-animal metamorphosis
and animal symbolism in expressing his ecological and socio-political concerns,
personal vision, and other forms of activism. Animals have particular importance in
the African socio-cultural context, and there are many instances of human-animal
transformation or animal symbolism in oral traditions. We argue that Ushie draws
from this paradigm in the adoption of animals in his poetry and poetics. Our close
reading of Ushie’s Popular Stand and Other Poems and Lambs at the Shrine reveals
the use of animals as symbols in the advocacy for ecological preservation and
balance and the characterisation of humans as animals or vice versa as a form of
satire against political leaders and oppressors. The archetypal significance of the
animals represented in the selected poems reflects Ushie’s vision, and through their
symbolism, issues bordering on socio-political malaise and environmentalism are
Subjects: African Literature; Post-Colonial Studies; Poetry
Keywords: animal symbolism; Niger Delta poetry; identity; Joe Ushie; environmentalism
Animals occupy an essential place in the African socio-cultural space. Many myths, legends, and
other oral literary forms reveal the fascination with animals or even their reverence or danger to
Mathias Iroro Orhero researches minority dis-
course, identity, Niger Delta literature (mainly
poetry), Black Canadian literature (mainly
poetry), folklore, and world literature. He is cur-
rently a doctoral candidate in the Department of
English, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. His
works have appeared in Comparative Literature
and Culture, Tydksrif vir Letterkunde, and African
Literature Today. He has also presented many
papers in notable conferences.
Friday Akpan Okon is an Associate Professor
at the Department of English, University of Uyo,
Nigeria. He researches African oral and written
literatures and poetics. His works have appeared
in many notable journals, and he has presented
papers at many academic conferences.
This paper studies the use of animal symbolism in
two poetry collections by Joe Ushie. We begin by
exploring the place of animal symbols in African
culture and proceed to establish how they are
used to convey ideas about human nature, the
environment, life, and other philosophical
thoughts. We then undertake a review of relevant
literature on the poetry of Ushie to establish that
animal symbolism has not been studied before
now. Having established that, we discuss some of
the animal symbols Ushie uses in Popular Stand
and Other Poems and Lambs at the Shrine. Our
close reading of the collections demonstrates
how Ushie uses animals to present his ideas
about environmental preservation, his socio-
ecological vision, and as a way of representing
bad leadership and other social malaise. From our
reading, we conclude that animal symbolism is
significant in Joe Ushie’s writing, and it could be
a way to understand his advocacy.
Orhero & Okon, Cogent Arts & Humanities (2021), 8: 1992084
© 2021 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons
Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
Received: 12 October 2020
Accepted: 6 October 2021
*Corresponding author: Mathias Iroro
Orhero, Department of English, McGill
University, Montreal, Canada
E-mail: mathias.orhero@mail.mcgill.
Reviewing editor:
Margrét Gunnarsdóttir Champion,
Goteborgs Universitet, Sweden
Additional information is available at
the end of the article
Page 1 of 12
humans. Olusola (2005) examines the place of animals in Yoruba ontology from the perspectives
of ethics. His analysis foregrounds the centrality of animals in Yoruba oral forms like the oríkì, and
he comments that: “the Yorùbá closely interact with animals, and this has also made their
scientific understanding of animals around them. This deep understanding of theirs about animals
has given them the power to know the attributes, characters and innate powers and virtues that
the supreme God has given to various animals in the universe” (p. 170). His argument here is that
animals exist in Yoruba indigenous thought, and their attributes are used to understand the world
and convey a certain depth of meaning. Okpewho (2003) confirms this point in his ascription of
“educational or moralistic quality” to tales that centre on “animals and humans and the lessons to
be drawn from their interaction” (p. 217). The point is that animal stories are used allegorically to
teach some lesson or inscribe a sense of morality in precolonial societies. This premise informs our
study of Joe Ushie’s Popular Stand and Other Poems and Lambs at the Shrine. We contend that
Ushie uses animals symbolically in his poetry to represent his socio-ecological vision and as a form
of cultural inscription.
Joe Ushie was born in Akorshi, Bendi, Obanliku Local Government Area of Cross River State,
Nigeria. He is an alumnus of Government Secondary School, Obudu, University of Calabar and
University of Ibadan, and he currently teaches English at the University of Uyo. His poetry has
attracted wide scholarship. Aboh (2017) describes Ushie as “one of Nigeria’s finest writers.” He
further comments that “He belongs to the group of Nigerian poets generally referred to as ‘third-
generation’ poets. His agrarian background later, in myriad ways, shaped his lexical configuration
as evident in his preponderant use of nature-based imagery . . . Ushie is remarkable for his critical
undertones on the sociopolitical condition in Nigeria and Africa.” Aboh’s categorisation of Ushie as
a “third generation poet” is significant because it situates Ushie in a tradition of protest writers
who spoke against military dictatorship in Nigeria, political corruption, and other social failings, as
well as, in the context of the Niger Delta, environmental and minority rights issues.
To Bassey (2008), Ushie’s poetry falls within the tradition of “protest literature” (p. 20). He adds
that “from Popular Stand through Lambs at the Shrine, Eclipse in Rwanda, to Hill Songs, Joe Ushie’s
works are concerned with the plight of the common man in contemporary Nigeria.” Bassey’s
reading of Ushie’s poetry is positioned in the framework of Ushie as a people’s poet whose
works portray the plight of the oppressed Nigerian. Similar to Bassey, Egbung (2012) submits
that Ushie’s poetry deals with the realities of man. To him, “Ushie’s poems are more concerned
with issues of culture, life, death and the unborn because he has come face to face with the
realities of his country that is in a war with itself” (p. 142). Egbung further identifies some of the
satirical tropes in the poetry of Ushie and how the poet uses them to confront the leadership
problems in Nigeria and the issues beleaguering society.
Aboh (2017) also confirms Bassey’s assertion that Ushie’s poetry deals with the common man.
In his words, Ushie “has continued to show unrelenting interest in the things that concern the
‘ordinary’ people. His acute examination of fear, extreme anxiety, restiveness and relative power-
lessness of the people goes a long way toward humanising the daily struggles of many Nigerians/
Africans who scavenge to survive in the midst of abundance.” Aboh demonstrates his position with
a linguistic analysis of selected poems by Joe Ushie. In another linguistic study, Aboh (2013a)
investigates pronominal strategies in the poetry of Ushie and concludes that “His use of language
is active, resistant and revolutionary, which corresponds with the active, conscious resistance and
leached terrorism by the military and its collaborators . . . His pronominal strategies therefore
provide us with deep understanding of how those in positions of authority impose a capitalist
social order on the masses” (pp. 183–184). Aboh probes into the construction of identity in Ushie’s
poetry through Bette-Bendi proverbs in yet another linguistic study. He declares that the “Bette-
Bendi proverbs and euphemisms Ushie appropriates serve as the linguistic armoury, which he
depends on to question and rebuff socio-political and socioeconomic issues that encumber the
collective existence of the Nigerian populace” (Aboh, 2013b, p. 107). What Aboh confirms here is
that Ushie draws from the cultural ethos of his Bette-Bendi people, and this view is helpful in our
Orhero & Okon, Cogent Arts & Humanities (2021), 8: 1992084
Page 2 of 12
proposition that Ushie relies on Bette-Bendi constructions of animals and their interactions with
humans in his use of animal symbolism in his poetry.
Tsaaior (2012) discusses Ushie’s Eclipse in Rwanda and comments that the collection
beams with effervescent hope for a new beginning since the eclipse, from all indications, is
not total and the sun will radiate its healing, iridescent rays on a world in stygian darkness.
The volume peaks significantly at two points: it combines thematic appropriateness and
a searing vision in the navigation of the murky waters that Africa, in her post-colonial
condition, is fatally plunged into. (p. 39)
Here, Tsaaior subscribes to a vision of hope and social change in Ushie’s poetry. His view is that
there is hope for the continent despite the bleak realities of the African poscolonial condition that
we find in Ushie’s poetry. Thus, Tsaaior’s reading hinges on Ushie’s representation of a pan-African
condition, especially with reference to the Rwandan genocide and other conflicts in Africa.
In terms of Ushie’s poetics, Aliyu’s (2013) investigation of the aesthetics of place in Ushie’s
Hillsongs is insightful. Hinging her study on ecocritical perspectives, Aliyu reads Ushie’s employ-
ment of place as a discursive strategy to catalogue the functionality, spirituality and mysticism of
nature while engaging in a political venture of mediating for those whose very existence is tied to
the preservation and the humane exploration of its components. Hence, Ushie’s deployment of the
aesthetic of ‘place’ is dual in function: as a framework for an exploration into how contemporary
poets perceive and utilize nature in their creative ventures; and as a political tool to champion the
quest for proper handling of the environment and the people affected by it in the face of capitalist
and industrial demands for resources. (p. 145)
Aliyu’s view is anchored on the idea that Ushie emphasises “place” as an ecocritical strategy to
represent his natural world. To her, Ushie’s poetry intervenes in the lives of the common people,
the deprived, and their struggle for survival in a national landscape. Like Aliyu, Ushie and Bello
(2014) reveal how the natural environment provides metaphors for the poems’ language and style.
To them, Ushie’s poetry is a “political representation of the agents of poverty as predator birds that
not only destroy the ecosystem, but also leave the pastoral people who depend on the ecosystem
in ‘tattered penury’. These agents are semiotized as politically powerful people from the north who
swoop on the ecosystem” (p. 1328). Here, they are concerned with how Ushie writes oppression
and marginality using signs and symbols, and their observation comes from a linguistic stylistic
reading of Ushie’s poetry.
The preceding reveals some of the scholarship on the poetry of Joe Ushie. What is apparent is
that apart from isolated mentions, the place of animal symbolism in Ushie’s poetry has not
attracted critical attention. Critics have read Ushie’s poetry and poetics based on the politics of
his generation, as well as from the perspective of environmentalism. However, one aspect of his
poetry and poetics that has not received attention is animal symbolism. It is this lacuna in
scholarship that justifies the need for our research.
The representation of animals in literary texts is not a new phenomenon. Bolongaro (2009) dates
animal representation in literature to the early fables that employed animal characters. He
submits that “Western poetry is almost unimaginable without animal metaphors and animal
imagery. Even realistic fiction relies on animals to achieve a wide range of rhetorical effects,
ranging from pathos, to bathos, and including the commonplace” (p. 105). This position confirms
the centrality of animals in European literary traditions.
Writers use animals for varied purposes in their works. However, in almost all cases, the animal
characters are representational. Animals in literature are sometimes employed in the archetypal
sense, representing certain universal traits, character types, emotions, or moods. Ameer (2011)
Orhero & Okon, Cogent Arts & Humanities (2021), 8: 1992084
Page 3 of 12
confirms this point in his study of animal symbolism in Ted Hughes’ poetry. Ameer believes that
Ted Hughes employs certain animals to represent violence, beauty, passion, and natural instincts.
He proceeds to identify animals like “jaguar,” “snake,” “otter” etc. and foregrounds what they
represent in Hughes’ poetry in line with their archetypal significance. Other similar studies have
also been done on Ted Hughes’ poetry, confirming the usefulness of such an archetypal reading of
Nwafor (2019) adopts an archetypal approach in her reading of animal symbolism in Igbo oral
and visual cultures and submits that animal symbols are an indication of the relevance and place
of animals in the lives of the Igbo. Humans have their place within the social structure - the noble,
poor, men, women and children. The same is as well tenable in the domain of animals - strong,
aggressive, cunning and intelligent animals as opposed to the submissive, meek, docile or passive
ones. The figurative attributes of animals thus is compared, allegorically and philosophically, to
specific personal temperaments attributed to humans as well as, to the ranking of individuals
within various social indigenous organizations in Africa. (pp. 130–131)
Her comment is informed by the primordial image of the animal and its ability to “mediate
between the physical, social and spiritual realm as conduits for emphasizing the essentiality of
aestheticized animal characters to human existence” (p. 131). As archetypes, animals can be used
symbolically to represent attributes constructed in either specific social spaces or as universal
traits. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the cultural context of any animal symbol and what
it may signify beyond the cultural space of production to capture its symbolic value.
In this paper, we define animal symbolism as the representation and signification of animals in
literature. Animals that are alluded to or referenced through any literary strategy are identified,
and their significance in the text is discussed with particular attention to the context and form of
the poems. Ushie’s Popular Stand and Other Poems was published in 1992 and has 34 poems. Many
of the poems in this collection reflect ecological themes. For example, in “Elephant,” Ushie (1992)
expresses the need for ecological preservation using the elephant. In this poem, the elephant
operates synecdochically, representing all animals. The poem begins with the speaker’s description
of elephant meat consumption:
it’s the Elephant,
its trunk
its tail
its limbs
all flesh, fleshy,
(p. 16)
This excerpt mentions the various parts of the elephants that can be thought of as delicacies. The
persona, however, ends the poem with a charge: “I can hear this faint warning echo:/Elephants
feed also” (p. 16). The closing lines place the poem in its appropriate context as a warning against
the indiscriminate consumption of animals as food. Here, there is what Mwangi (2019) calls “vegan
unconscious” at work (p. 7). Mwangi explores the intersections between animal studies and
postcolonial studies and comments that “Although they do not openly advocate vegan ethics,
African authors grapple with the possibilities of alternatives to meat eating and encourage us to
minimize animal suffering as much as possible. That is, postcolonial animal-consuming cultures
are presented in African texts as shifting toward an embrace of cultural and political practices that
avoid the use of animals” (p. 8). His position is that African writers convey an unconscious sense of
vegan advocacy through the sentience given to represented animals. In Ushie’s poem, elephants
Orhero & Okon, Cogent Arts & Humanities (2021), 8: 1992084
Page 4 of 12
are presented as sentient beings who need to feed like humans, foregrounding their agency. The
sanctity of animal life is emphasised in the speaker’s tone, and the word “elephant” is spelt as
a proper noun (with initial letter capitalisation).
From another perspective, the elephant can also be interpreted as a symbol of the Niger Delta
and its vast wealth. The entire nation feeds on the “meat” of the Niger Delta region and enjoys the
wealth gotten from the region, but they forget that “elephants feed also.” Here, the focus is on the
marginality of the Niger Delta region and its people whose environment and means of livelihood
are destroyed by the oil industry. The ill-treatment of the minority peoples of the region is
configured into the symbol of the elephant which is devoured without any consideration or
The advocacy for ecological preservation is only present in Ushie’s “Song of the bedbug.” Here,
the poet draws from the bedbug myth that is predominant in Eastern Nigeria. The bedbug
represents the entire fauna and how the activities of man affect all, big and small. The poem
begins with the word “violated,” representing how the “sun-soaked” bedbug feels. The mother
bedbug tells her son:
Don’t give up, son
The death facing us
Is from harsh hot sun
Soon, its strength spent
Sun will roost and
We will rise
(p. 22)
In these lines, the mother bedbug emphasises that the sun is killing them, but even in the face of
imminent death, she expresses hope that the sun will be no more one day. From an ecological
perspective, the bedbug represents the fauna, while the sun’s harshness is a direct consequence of
man’s ozone-depleting activities. Although the bedbug is small, they are significantly affected by
man’s activities. This is a cautionary poem that presents the ecological imbalance caused by man’s
destruction of the natural environment.
From the socio-political perspective, the bedbug can be interpreted as a symbol of the masses.
The sun represents the political oppressors who torture the masses and unleash suffering and
agony on them. However, as in the mythical origin of the bedbug tale, the mother bedbug tells her
son that the “Sun will roost and/We will rise.” This foregrounds the transience of the human
condition. Though the sun may be harsh now, night will come, and the bedbugs will rise. The
interpretation here is that the political elites cannot torture the innocent masses for long because
no condition is permanent. This reading of the bedbug as an oppressed creature also echoes
a form of minority politics in which the bedbugs symbolise the oppressed and minoritized people of
the Niger Delta who suffer the burden of exploitation and marginalization. In this sense, Ushie
encodes hope and a utopic vision for the people.
Natural balance is celebrated using animal symbolism in “A trip home.” This poem is about the
speaker’s trip to Bendi, where his “umbilical cord rests” (p. 31). The speaker foregrounds the
environmental harmony of his rural community where there are “healing hills” and “tropical rain
forests.” He returns home “as a chicken/To her mother.” Chicken is used here as an archetype of
innocence and safety since the mother-hen always protects it. To the speaker, nature is his
mother-hen. He relishes the memory of his pristine environment, and the “peaceful home of the
tilapia/The electric and mud fishes,” the “crabs rising like peace,” and squirrels “running the Empire
Race,” among other animal symbols, represent the pristine state of the environment as he knew it.
Orhero & Okon, Cogent Arts & Humanities (2021), 8: 1992084
Page 5 of 12
On returning home after what appears to be a sojourn away from the pristine environment he
remembers, the speaker discovers “restless soldier ants, armed with/A match and the new chain-
saw,/Have murdered our love.” Here, animals transform into humans through the figuration of
soldier ants. Soldier ants, as used in this poem, represent the busybodies who destroy the
environment with ferocity. They have “violated the tilapia,” and they “try an axe, a hammer,
a match or saw on own armour” (pp. 33–34). The speaker portrays man, transformed to soldier
ants, as dangerous and destructive to their natural habitats or “own armour.” The poem ends on
a cautionary note: “When the armour is gone, we’ll learn/The young fly’s lesson . . . /Our lesson as
warring gadflies” (p. 34). Two animal symbols are introduced in the preceding lines. The young “fly”
that learns his lesson alludes to the cautionary tale of the stubborn fly that follows a corpse to the
grave. Gadflies are a type of flies that bite livestock. The poet transforms man into gadflies to
represent the leeching on nature and eventual destruction of the natural world.
In “The tiger,” Ushie celebrates nature’s law of the survival of the fittest using contrasting
predator-prey animal symbolism. The tiger is the predator, and it represents agility, strength,
and stealth. In this poem, the tiger stalks, leaps, and devours “Orango’tang, kangaroo, gorilla”
(p. 40). These animals are prey to the tiger, and they serve to represent nature’s natural order of
things where the strong prey on the weak in order for natural selection to occur. The poet
celebrates the tiger after his hunting success thus: “Then is he seen/Then is he felt/Then is he
heard” (p. 40). The eponymous tiger in the poem pounces on its prey, rather than declaring itself
a tiger, and in a sense, this representation alludes to Soyinka’s oft-quoted quip that “A tiger does
not proclaim his tigritude—he pounces.” It is after devouring the prey that he is “seen,” “felt,” and
“heard.” The poem is short, but it is a succinct celebration of natural order and normal predator-
prey relations. Ushie uses animal symbolism to express ecological balance in this poem.
The archetype of the scapegoat forms the basis for “The scapegoat.” In this short but poignant
poem, the speaker narrates an incident thus:
Papa raised a cane
Mama echoes with an axe:
“He must be killed.”
The offence:
I spilled water on the floor
I fought not for fairplay
For, it’s better for Pa and Ma
To co-kill me than to
Continue their yester-quarrel
(p. 41)
Here, Ushie draws from the archetypal significance of the scapegoat and his persona is trans-
formed into one. A scapegoat is an animal or person blamed for wrongdoings or mistakes of
others, especially for reasons of expediency. Its archetypal significance is rooted in both African
culture and Judeo-Christian mythology. In this poem, the persona’s parents are armed with a cane
and an axe, and they attack the persona for the offence of spilling water on the floor. The parents
exaggerate the offence and declare that the persona must be killed. However, like the typical
scapegoat, he accepts his fate as long as both parents come together to kill him instead of
continuing their long-standing quarrel. The scapegoat in this poem symbolises one who must
sacrifice himself for the greater good. It is this idea of selflessness and a sense of collective
responsibility that Ushie advocates in this poem.
“Son of the soil” is a poem composed to celebrate freedom and self-determination. The poet
employs the animal symbolism of a “young he-goat” as an archetype for youth, strength, virility,
Orhero & Okon, Cogent Arts & Humanities (2021), 8: 1992084
Page 6 of 12
and curiosity. The he-goat “wallows” in freedom, tears through the yard he is kept in and attempts
an escape. After some trials, he contemplates:
Why should I tread softly
Why should I tread gently
Why should I tread mindfully
On this ground of my birth?
Mother it is that was bought,
Not I
Here was I born-
A son of the soil!
Market days come and go
And kids live and grow
Unseeing that tether ahead
Unseeing that market yonder
(p. 42)
The he-goat’s contemplation reveals his love for freedom, and he represents all who are enslaved,
minoritized or oppressed in one way or another. The he-goat’s quest for freedom and his justification
that his mother was bought, not himself, represents the poet’s vision of a free society where the sins,
actions, and inactions of parents do not constrain or limit children. It is also noteworthy that the he-
goat’s constant crash after each attempt to jump represents fortitude and perseverance. Like the
Cockroach in Tewfik Al-Hakim’s Fate of a Cockroach, the he-goat takes his fate into his hands and
attempts to make meaning out of his existence. Thus, Ushie uses the symbolism of the he-goat to
celebrate freedom and espouse the existentialist struggle for meaning and purpose in the universe.
Furthermore, the he-goat can also be interpreted as the youth filled with pride and recklessness
without knowing that life is filled with bobby traps that can mar a careless or reckless person. In
the poem’s last lines, the speaker says that the he-goat is unaware of the “tether ahead” and the
“market yonder.” The tether is the collar used on a goat or any other animal to restrict its
movement when tied to a rope. In the poem, the he-goat, representing youths, is unaware of
the tether and market where goats are sold. This means that the youth is ignorant of the hurdles
that one must face in life. Here wisdom and caution are celebrated.
The harmony between man and nature is foregrounded in “When I think.” The poem opens with
the poet’s acknowledgement of ecological order: “Of nature renewing herself in circles/Of birth and
death/growth and decay” (p. 49). Then animal symbolism is used to represent this order:
Of the alligator’s birth years
numbered by his swallowed pebbles,
of the cock and his
faultless timing of man
[. . .]
Of the elephant and his fabled memory
Of the bat and her multi-purpose mouth
(p. 49)
The animal symbols employed in this poem represent the pristine state of nature. The alligator has
a natural age counter, the cock has a default clock that man follows, the elephant never forgets,
and the bat uses its mouth for feeding, echolocation, and excreting remains of undigested food,
among others. These animals are symbolic representations of natural order and a theistic
Orhero & Okon, Cogent Arts & Humanities (2021), 8: 1992084
Page 7 of 12
disposition that “There is Something like Him there” (p. 49). Ushie inscribes his personal belief in
a greater being in this poem, and to him, the natural environment exists in its untamed state and
functions effectively because of “He” who is “above.”
Lambs at the Shrine was published in 1995, and it is a collection of 32 poems. The poems in this
collection are mainly socio-political. In “The news,” Ushie (1995) employs animal symbols to reflect
on life and to express his pessimism on the state of affairs. In the traditional sense, the news is
a report of abnormal or unusual happenings, and this is what the speaker captures in the poem in
the first few lines of the poem: “The news!/Omens and omens and omens. // At bedtime yesterday,
some hen/in the yard crowed cock-like” (p. 9). The poet paints the atmosphere of confusion and
absurdity using the hen as a symbol. It is common knowledge that hens do not normally crow as
cocks do. However, by depicting hens crowing like cocks, the poet relays the idea of abnormality. It
is this idea that manifests throughout the poem. Animal symbolism continues in the poem:
Last week, Agba’s car crushed two
ducks on the highway. This morning,
the chameleon hurried across the
road before us. Recently, two
green plantain leaves drooped
right before our open eyes. The
owls and the cats have wailed
their throats hoarse these seasons
(p. 9)
Here, the speaker shows more abnormality in the depiction of a duck on the highway. It is known
that ducks do not patrol the highways but prefer to reside in and around rivers or other large water
sources. In this poem, a duck is crushed on the highway, signifying an abnormal event.
A chameleon also hurries across a road. This animal is not known for its speed, but the speaker
describes a fast-moving chameleon, representing the abnormality of the world. Furthermore, the
owls and cats, both nocturnal and normally quiet animals, are seen wailing in the poem. The idea
of chaos and abnormality is evident in the poet’s transformation of animal archetypes. In one
stanza, Ushie alludes to the conflicts in Rwanda, Bosnia, and Somalia. At the time the poem was
written, these countries were engaged in either war or some civil conflict. This is concretized with
the reference to “festival of wars,” where there is a “feast for vultures.” Wars are generally
disastrous events where deaths are expected. The symbolism of vulture in this instance is drawn
from its archetypal representation of death and mortality.
Beyond its symbolisation of death, vultures also represent oppression in “Evening tales.” The
poem begins with the speaker’s narration to his children of forefathers “who were warriors” (p. 13)
and who procured farmlands from neighbours through hounding and plundering. The emphasis is
on the bravery of the forefathers in confronting others. Using contrast and animal symbolism, the
speaker quizzes:
But what tale will my children tell
about me and these overblown vultures
landing on my roof-top in wait for the
flesh of my starving child whose lean
meal the vultures have seized?
(p. 13)
Here, vultures represent oppression and the speaker’s helplessness in the face of oppression is
contrasted with his forefather’s bravery. The poet transforms political leaders into vultures, and in
Orhero & Okon, Cogent Arts & Humanities (2021), 8: 1992084
Page 8 of 12
this context, the vultures are the political leaders who have seized the “lean meal” of the persona’s
children and still want to eat their flesh. This depiction foregrounds the wickedness of Nigerian
political leaders who steal money and opportunities from the common man. Further revealing this
human-animal transformation, the speaker says:
Each generation has its woes and wars
ours must be with these vultures
on my rooftop spreading their wings
in leisure like the politician’s agbada while
we wait in misery with feminine minds
and sorrow-soaked hearts
(p. 14).
In this excerpt, the use of simile makes the encoding of humans as animals clearer in comparing
the vulture’s spreading of wings to the politicians’ signature agbada clothes.
In “Fate of the sheep,” Ushie employs the contrasting animal symbols of sheep and lion to
represent the masses and the leaders in Nigeria. Through the agency of human-animal transfor-
mation, the masses are embodied in the sheep, an archetype of meekness and gentility, and the
corrupt political leaders are embodied in the hungry lion, an archetype of aggression and predation
in certain cultural imaginations. In the poem, the hungry lion is “bereft of reason to devour the/
sheep. .” (p. 24) but ends up accusing the hungry sheep who stands downstream of “stirring up/
dirts for him to drink of, up the/course of the stream where he stands/steel-like, bellicose and
accoutred.” The depiction of the lion is in line with its archetypal form. The lion represents the
political elites who stay upstream and still oppress the hungry sheep who reside downstream.
The poem further reveals how the lion devours and dismembers the sheep for meat without any
sign of guilt, remorse, or worry. This depiction is the bitter reality of the Nigerian society where the
political elites plunder and loot from the public purse even as the ordinary man suffers and lives in
abject poverty. The swallow, a type of bird, utters, “Such is the law of the jungle” before flying away
“in disgust.” The swallow represents the passive observers who can do nothing as they witness the
oppression of the helpless man by those at the helm of affairs. It is also a satire of those who “fly
away” when they could have done something to save helpless people from predation.
In “Oracle of the night,” the owl is employed to symbolise death and evil. The poem opens with the
ideophone “Huhu, hu-huhu huhu/Huhu, hu-huhu huhu” (p. 44) to capture the sound the owl makes.
In a language laden with apostrophe and rhetorical questions, the speaker contemplates: “O bird of
the night buried in tuft/of leaves in dark sacred groves,/whose death are you announcing?/Whose
dirge are you singing?” (p. 44). The phrase “O bird of the night” within the poem’s context refers to the
owl. The feeling that the owl conjures in this poem is that of dread and fear. Foregrounding the sense
of impending calamity that the owl symbolises, the speaker quizzes: “tell me, tell me what you’re
seeing/this night, how this day will end/and if the hooting is for me” (p. 45). The preceding lines are
steeped deeply in the superstitions associated with the owl, especially in the Nigerian socio-cultural
context where it is believed that the owl is a harbinger of death. The poet uses the owl symbol to
express his pessimism and the idea of man’s ephemerality.
The titular poem of the collection “Lambs at the shrine” employs the archetype of the sacrificial
lamb. Here, “Ingrid, Dele, Wali/and all those who felled . . . ” (p. 54) are transformed into sacrificial
lambs. The sacrificial lamb symbolises the person or animal that must be killed/sacrificed for the
common good. Its archetypal import derives from both African indigenous thought and Judeo-
Christian mythology. In the poem, the sacrificial lambs represent those who died while fighting for
the people’s freedom. This symbolism is further inscribed through the allusion to Ingrid Jonker,
a South African anti-apartheid poet whose poem was read by Nelson Mandela when he became
Orhero & Okon, Cogent Arts & Humanities (2021), 8: 1992084
Page 9 of 12
South Africa’s first black president; Dele Giwa, who was murdered by a letter bomb as a result of
his attack of Nigerian military despots; and Obi Wali, who was brutally murdered in his home
because of his ferocious criticism of the military junta.
The poet describes how the “golden lamps” of the sacrificial lambs are “quenched in the mid-/
dle of a night walk” (p. 54). He also uses vultures to symbolise death and gloom in the lines: “those
golden lamps/blown off by the vultures’/wings in flight at night.” The vultures here are metamor-
phosed humans, specifically those who unleash tyranny and death. The sacrificial lambs pledged
their lives to “ideals which tantalise like Eldorado,” but they are “unaware of our new creed/
founded, as always by man, on greed” (p. 55). They are blindfolded and taken to the “blades of the
guillotine.” The poem then parodies a statement associated with military rule: “to keep the ship
going/we must all be dumb.” This line echoes the civil war propaganda of Gen. Yakubu Gowon’s
military junta: “to keep Nigerian one is a task that must be done,” a statement which essentially
negated Biafran secession from Nigeria. The sacrificial lambs are finally “emptied of blood at the/
shrine of our new god” (p. 55). The “shrine” references the poem’s title and refers to the new order
of things.
Adopting the archetype of the lamb, Ushie’s “song of the season” is written as an elegy for
Kenule Saro-Wiwa, the famous Ogoni martyr who was killed in 1995 by the military junta of Gen.
Sani Abacha. In the poem, Saro-Wiwa is transformed into a lamb “that stared the invading/leopard
in the face” (p. 56). As a lamb, his meekness and gentility contrast with the leopard, a predatory
animal that represents aggression and fierceness. The military junta that sentenced Saro-Wiwa to
death is embodied in the leopard. This contrast is presented in another stanza of the poem thus:
“In the leopard’s clenched teeth/is the prime lamb of our yard,/but near the leopard’s head/is the
hunter’s aim” (p. 57). The hunter’s aim represents the speaker’s conception of divine justice for the
marauding leopard in these lines. The speaker consolidates this point by asserting that the dead
martyr will “sing/the requiem for the leopard.” There is a paradox in the preceding lines because
the dead will not be around to sing a requiem. However, the poet emphasises the immutability of
the cause and struggle that the “lamb” stood for before his slaughter.
Using more animal symbols, the speaker reveals what followed Saro-Wiwa’s death:
Shocked, the ever-journeying wind,
reared not her head this day; the
birds hid in their nests, the rivers
slowed down their pace, the ants
wept aloud, the owls hooted
themselves hoarse and the
dogs barked their throats dry
(p. 56).
The above lines reveal some of the reactions to Saro-Wiwa’s death using animal symbols. The birds
that generally soar the skies hide in their nests, and the ants that are not known for crying weep
aloud. Even the owls and dogs are anguished. The abnormality of the situation represents the
confusion that Saro-Wiwa’s death caused. The animals also represent the various character types
in society and their responses to the martyr’s death.
Ushie is a very creative and dynamic poet. His use of human-animal metamorphosis and animal
symbolism to reveal ecological and socio-political concerns is noteworthy. What is evident from
the close reading is that in Ushie’s Popular Stand and Other Poems, animal symbols are employed
to celebrate ecological harmony and caution man about the dangers of destabilizing the natural
environment. He also uses animal symbolism to celebrate freedom. In Lambs at the Shrine, Ushie
uses animal symbolism to represent bad leadership, social malaise, socio-political activism, and
Orhero & Okon, Cogent Arts & Humanities (2021), 8: 1992084
Page 10 of 12
personal vision. In both collections, the symbolism of the animals sometimes originates from their
archetypal place in the African cultural milieu, especially of his Bette-Bendi ethnic group, or from
the context of the poem. There is still much to be done in unlocking the functions of animal
symbolism in the poetry of Joe Ushie and other Nigerian poets. However, our paper has pioneered
a reading of Ushie’s poetry in particular and Nigerian poetry in general from this perspective.
The authors received no direct funding for this research.
Author details
Mathias Iroro Orhero
Friday Akpan Okon
Department of English, McGill University, Montreal,
Department of English, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the
Citation information
Cite this article as: Animal symbolism in the poetry of Joe
Ushie, Mathias Iroro Orhero & Friday Akpan Okon, Cogent
Arts & Humanities (2021), 8: 1992084.
Aboh, R. (2013a). Pronominal strategies: Language and
social reality in Joe Ushie’s poetry. UNIUYO Journal of
Humanities, 16 &17(2), 169–185. https://www.acade
Aboh, R. (2013b). Proverbs and euphemisms as discourse
strategies in Joe Ushie’s poetry. African Studies, 72
(1), 107–120.
Aboh, R. (2017, September 17). The poetry of Joe Ushie.
The Guardian Literary Series.
Aliyu, S. (2013). Aesthetics of place in contemporary
Nigerian poetry: An ecocritical eeading of Joe Ushie’s
Hill Songs. Journal of Literary Society of Nigeria, JLSN,
5, 142–149.
Ameer, S. A. (2011). Animal imagery in Ted Hughes’
poetry. Journal of Human Science, 1(8), 37–47.
Bassey, U. B. (2008). The hills and the vales: Images of
leadership in the poetry of Joe Ushie. Currents in
African Literature and the English Language, 5, 20–33.
Bolongaro, E. (2009). Calvino’s encounter with the animal:
Anthropomorphism, cognition and ethics in. Palomar.
Quaderni d’italianistica, 30(2), 105–128. https://doi.
Egbung, I. E. (2012). Satire in Joe Ushie’s Hillsongs and
Lambs at the Shrine. Lwati: A Journal of
Contemporary Research, 9(2), 135–143. https://www.
Mwangi, E. M. (2019). The postcolonial animal: African
literature and posthuman ethics. University of
Michigan Press.
Nwafor, N. J. U. (2019). Significance of animal motifs in
indigenous Uli body and wall paintings. Mgbakoigba:
Journal of African Studies, 8(1), 117–133. https://
Okpewho, I. (2003). Oral tradition: Do storytellers lie?
Journal of Folklore Research, 40(3), 215–232. https://
Olusola, A. G. (2005). Animals in the traditional worldview
of the Yorùbá. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore,
30, 155–172.
Tsaaior, J. T. (2012). Postcolonial history, memory and the
poetic imagination: Interrogating the “civan” meta-
phor in Joe Ushie’s. Eclipse in Rwanda. Journal of
Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry, 7(17), 28–39.
Ushie, G. O., & Bello, I. (2014). Umbilical accord and sym-
biosis between man and the environment: A stylistic
analysis of selected poems of Joe Ushie’s Hill Songs and
Unimna Angrey’s. Drought (Ubuang). Theory and
Practice in Language Studies, 4(7), 1327–1333. https://
Ushie, J. (1992). Popular stand and other poems. Kraft
Ushie, J. (1995). Lambs at the shrine. Kraft Books.
Orhero & Okon, Cogent Arts & Humanities (2021), 8: 1992084
Page 11 of 12
© 2021 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Cogent Arts & Humanities (ISSN: 2331-1983) is published by Cogent OA, part of Taylor & Francis Group.
Publishing with Cogent OA ensures:
Immediate, universal access to your article on publication
High visibility and discoverability via the Cogent OA website as well as Taylor & Francis Online
Download and citation statistics for your article
Rapid online publication
Input from, and dialog with, expert editors and editorial boards
Retention of full copyright of your article
Guaranteed legacy preservation of your article
Discounts and waivers for authors in developing regions
Submit your manuscript to a Cogent OA journal at
Orhero & Okon, Cogent Arts & Humanities (2021), 8: 1992084
Page 12 of 12
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Full-text available
This paper examines the interface of language and social reality as reflected in the use of pronouns in Ushie's poetry. The paper adopts the concepts of pronominal reference and deictic expressions as its theoretcal framework. The data are drawn from three of Joe Ushie's poetry collections – (1998, 2004 henceforth ), (2004, 2010 henceforth ) and (2000, 2004 henceforth ). These collections are selected because they demonstrate exquisite use of pronouns in in-group and out-group constructions. The paper shows that pronouns are linguistic features that give uniqueness to poetic discourse, i.e., they indicate how antagonism to the negative , and solidarity with the in-group can be constructed. Also, the archival and procreative roles of the Nigerian poet are revealed.
Full-text available
This paper examines the use of satire by Joe Ushie in Hillsongs and Lambs at the Shrine. The collections condemn the ills in the society, failure of leadership, bribery and corruption and all kinds of vices in the society. Through these satirical devices, the reader is awaken into looking deeper at some of the things taken for granted and the society is cleansed of all the ills that hinders its progress.
This article examines the importance of the portrayal of animals in Palomar, Italo Calvino's last major work of fiction. The discussion moves from some observations on the representation of animals in fiction, to a reflection on the ethical issues which emerge once the "question of the animal" is confronted in its full complexity. It is argued that this is precisely the question that Calvino's work addresses. Mr Palomar's trajectory is marked at key junctures by encounters with animals. A close reading of the passages which describe these encounters reveals not only Palomar's cognitive impasse, but also that at the root of this impasse lies a fundamental ethical failure which the protagonist is incapable to acknowledge. Palomar's escapist strategies ultimately amount to a refusal of life itself and lead the author to liquidate his protagonist at the end of the narrative.
One of the challenges that narrators face is the critical reception of their accounts by the audience. While the narrator is inevitably subject to the imaginative and emotive pressures of the narrative material, the audience tends to take a more rational view of the artistic choices the narrator makes in his effort to construct a convincing account. The "aesthetic discrepancy" that seems to exist between narrator and audience leads some listeners to feel that the narrator is lying. Some scholars have questioned the usefulness of such accounts in the construction of a people's history. Okpewho addresses the issue by examining a tale he recorded in Nigeria from the narrator Charles Simayi about a contest between two men for a chieftaincy title. In making himself one of the judges in that contest, Simayi draws misgivings from one of his listeners about Simayi's touted role in the event. Okpewho examines this act of self-insertion against the background of similar evidence in various African countries and elsewhere in the world, and sees in it a narrator who "feels committed enough to the interests of his society to take a subjective stand in interrogating them. What is at play in such narratives is not so much an abstract concept of truth, as the right of the individual to review the facts of historical experience in the context of contemporary realities."
This paper analyses selected poems in the poetry collection of Joe Ushie entitled Hill Songs and those of Unimna Angrey's collection entitled Drought (Ubuang). It is an investigation of the linguistic choices that the selected writers have made in order to establish their connections with their environment and the representation of the effects of the negative and unfavourable conduct and destructive activities of man on it (the environment). The paper uses a conflation of three theories- ecofeminism, modification in grammar and conceptual theory of metaphor. In this respect, focus is mainly on the use of lexical items, verses, the imagery and certain literary devices, such as metaphor and simile, that the poets deploy in their works to establish that connection and the attack that the environment, which man is inextricably a part of, has undergone in man's quest for development. The aim is to draw attention to the poetic discourse on the effects of the man's interactions with the environment as expressed by these new poets. The paper concludes that the poets' concern for, and conviction about the symbiosis between man and the environment have constrained the deployment of anthropomorphic and anthropocentric idiom and the style of their poetry.
Studies on proverbs and euphemisms, most especially from linguistic circles in African studies, have concentrated on traditional interpretations of the sub-generic verbal text. Proverbs and euphemisms, from this traditionalist perspective, are considered as given, that is, naturally known, and therefore do not require critical or thorough interpretations; and this tends to undermine the cathartic as well as revolutionary strength with which proverbs and euphemisms are imbued. This article investigates Joe Ushie's poetry to examine his reliance on indigenous proverbs and euphemisms as discursive strategies, which he utilises in questioning socio-political disturbances and self-indulgence in his Nigerian society. The article reveals that the Bette-Bendi proverbs and euphemisms Ushie appropriates serve as the linguistic armoury, which he depends on to question and rebuff socio-political and socioeconomic issues that encumber the collective existence of the Nigerian populace.
This is a contribution to an on-going debate on animal ethics. It is an epistemological study into the Yorùbá beliefs and perceptions about animals that have existed and still exist in the areas they inhabit. The research sets out to elucidate the Yorùbá perception of animals with regard to their classification, habitat, and their role and position in religious, political, social, economic, and domestic domains of humans. This leads to an appraisal of relationships that exist between the Yorùbá people and animals in their communities. The study explores the Yorùbá folklore in its various dimensions as the paradigm to espouse their ontological perception of animals. The study concludes that the Yorùbá people attach much importance to their animals and that animals occupy an important place and space in human existence and life on the globe.