ArticlePDF Available

Preparing the public health workforce for digital health futures: the case for digital Health training & capacity building

Authors:
  • WHO European Observatory on Health Systems & Policies
  • Ministry for Health, Malta

Abstract

Digital technologies are rapidly being integrated into a wide range of health fields, public health in particular. While ‘digital health' has the potential to significantly improve population health and well-being outcomes, its effective implementation and responsible use are contingent on building a public health workforce with a sufficient level of knowledge and skills to effectively navigate the digital transformations in health. In particular, the next generation of public health professionals-namely youth-must be adequately prepared to maximise the potential of these digital transformations. This presentation will highlight three key priority areas which should be prioritised in digital health education in public health to fully harness the potential benefits of digital health: capacity building, opportunities for youth, and an ethics-driven approach. It will also present applications of digital health (technologies) and best practices for public health education.
3.G. Round table: How to prepare the public health
workforce for a digital health future?
Organised by: EUPHA-DH
Chair persons: Duarte Vital Brito (Portugal)
Contact: duartevitalbrito@outlook.com
Digital health is a crucial field for healthcare sustainability and
adequate response to emerging health challenges. It has
potential to increase efficiency in public health areas, such as
surveillance, communication, data analysis and visualization,
planning and collaboration. While the COVID-19 pandemic
has accelerated the digitalisation of healthcare, a structured
and planned approach is needed to ensure its sustainable and
equitable integration in healthcare. Capacity building in digital
literacy plays a key role to ensure an adequate implementation
of digital public health. Moreover, the application of digital
health solutions in public health services requires a proper
training for students, young professionals, and public health
experts. To fulfil this, education on digital health should be
fully integrated in medical and public health curricula. Our
workshop aims to discuss the potential of digital health
technologies for public health services and identify proposals
for a renewed digital public health curriculum. In this
workshop, we will present a summary of potential uses of
digital health in public health, focusing advances developed
during COVID-19 pandemic. This introduction will provide a
background for participants to be aware of digital health
solutions, from basic digital services to innovations, that are
applicable in public health practice. Panellists will share both
local and national experiences. Although there are some
examples of digital health updated curricula, a more
comprehensive and structured approach to public health
training is needed. Digital public health education should
include specific topics, such as capacity building, opportunities
for youth, and an ethics-driven approach. However, it should
be tailored for public health students and professionals needs,
which are certainly different. A short presentation will provide
a guiding framework for participants to discuss the topic.
Following, during small group discussions, workshop partici-
pants will share perspectives and suggestions for an updated
digital public health curricula, including different approaches
for both undergraduate students, public health residents and
public health experts. In this round table discussion, one
panelist will present a summary of potential uses of digital
health in public health (10 minutes). The following presenta-
tion will cover main concerns that digital public health
education should consider, particularly for young professionals
(10 minutes). Following, participants will be asked to discuss
in 3 to 6 small groups which topics should be included in
curricula and training opportunities in medical schools, public
health schools and public health services (20 minutes). Finally,
each group will briefly present their conclusions (15 minutes),
which will be highlighted in a wrap-up conclusion (5 minutes).
We intend to keep in touch with all participants, in order to
develop a concrete proposal for digital health education
curricula.
Key messages:
Digital health has potential to increase efficiency in multiple
public health areas and digital health education is a key step
to ensure its implementation in public health schools and
services.
COVID-19 accelerated the digitalization in public health,
but a planned approach is needed to guarantee adequate
training for students and professionals.
The critical role of Digital Health in Public Health
Stefan Buttigieg
S Buttigieg
1,2,3
, D Vital Brito
1,4
, B Wong
1,5
1
EUPHA-DH
2
Ministry for Health, Valletta, Malta
3
Digital Health Malta, Gh
argh
ur, Malta
4
Central Lisbon Public Health Unit, Regional Health Administration of Lisbon
and Tagus Valley, Lisbon, Portugal
5
Secretariat, The Lancet & Financial Times ‘‘Governing Health Futures 2030:
Growing up in a digital world’’ Commission, Geneva, Switzerland
Contact: info@stefanbuttigieg.com
Digitalization in itself is not simply a means to an end but
involves an operational change in workflows that is on the
critical-path to the digital transformation of public health. The
COVID-19 pandemic has been a unique opportunity to put a
shining light on all the different technologies that were
available and also consider a large number of new and
innovative technologies that were developed in a breath-taking
place over a period of one year. These different initiatives also
brought relevant advances in public health needs such as
epidemiological surveillance, rapid case identification, inter-
ruption of community transmission and communication with
different audiences. Moreover, social media channels, blogs
and websites confirmed to be a fertile ground to find data for
research, but also to spread misinformation - and public health
professionals should be ready to counter that threat effectively.
This presentation aims to provide a comprehensive back-
ground on digital tools and strategies that can be used in
national and local public health services and how stakeholder
alignment across different sectors could propel forward the
implementation of digital solutions.
Preparing the public health workforce for digital
health futures: the case for digital Health training &
capacity building
Brian Li Han Wong
B Wong
1,5
, S Buttigieg
1,2,3
, D Vital Brito
1,4
1
EUPHA-DH
2
Ministry for Health, Valletta, Malta
3
Digital Health Malta, Gh
argh
ur, Malta
4
Central Lisbon Public Health Unit, Regional Health Administration of Lisbon
and Tagus Valley, Lisbon, Portugal
5
Secretariat, The Lancet & Financial Times ‘‘Governing Health Futures 2030:
Growing up in a digital world’’ Commission, Geneva, Switzerland
Contact: b.wong@ucl.ac.uk
Digital technologies are rapidly being integrated into a wide
range of health fields, public health in particular. While ‘digital
health’ has the potential to significantly improve population
health and well-being outcomes, its effective implementation
and responsible use are contingent on building a public health
workforce with a sufficient level of knowledge and skills to
effectively navigate the digital transformations in health. In
particular, the next generation of public health professionals-
namely youth-must be adequately prepared to maximise the
potential of these digital transformations. This presentation
will highlight three key priority areas which should be
prioritised in digital health education in public health to
fully harness the potential benefits of digital health: capacity
building, opportunities for youth, and an ethics-driven
approach. It will also present applications of digital health
(technologies) and best practices for public health education.
Developing a proposal for an updated digital public
health curriculum
Duarte Vital Brito
D Vital Brito
1,4
, B Wong
1,2,3
, S Buttigieg
1,5
1
EUPHA-DH
2
Ministry for Health, Valletta, Malta
3
Digital Health Malta, Gh
argh
ur, Malta
4
Central Lisbon Public Health Unit, Regional Health Administration of Lisbon
and Tagus Valley, Lisbon, Portugal
iii74 European Journal of Public Health, Volume 31 Supplement 3, 2021
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/31/Supplement_3/ckab164.197/6405421 by Mount Olive College user on 10 November 2021
... For instance, it is unlikely that there has been substantial increase in available resources for digital mental health, and although regions in Sweden are investing in digital innovations, mental health has not been their priority [45]. Similarly, leadership and public health workforce capacity building requires structured and complex implementation efforts [46]. Moreover, despite expectations of a massive increase of digital mental health treatments after the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of treatments in Sweden was still modest during the COVID-19 pandemic (refer to the Methods section), which makes the identified barriers and facilitators relevant. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Digital mental health represents a way to increase access to evidence-based psychological support. However, the implementation of digital mental health in routine health care practice is limited, with few studies focusing on implementation. Accordingly, there is a need to better understand the barriers to and facilitators of implementing digital mental health. Existing studies have mainly focused on the viewpoints of patients and health professionals. Currently, there are few studies about barriers and facilitators from the perspective of primary care decision makers, that is, the persons responsible for deciding whether a given digital mental health intervention should be implemented in a primary care organization. Objective: The objectives were to identify and describe barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of digital mental health as perceived by primary care decision makers, evaluate the relative importance of different barriers and facilitators, and compare barriers and facilitators reported by primary care decision makers who have versus have not implemented digital mental health interventions. Methods: A web-based self-report survey was conducted with primary care decision makers responsible for the implementation of digital mental health in primary care organizations in Sweden. Answers to 2 open-ended questions about barriers and facilitators were analyzed through summative and deductive content analysis. Results: The survey was completed by 284 primary care decision makers-59 (20.8%) decision makers representing implementers (ie, organizations that offered digital mental health interventions) and 225 (79.2%) respondents representing nonimplementers (ie, organizations that did not offer digital mental health interventions). Overall, 90% (53/59) of the implementers and 98.7% (222/225) of the nonimplementers identified barriers, and 97% (57/59) of the implementers and 93.3% (210/225) of the nonimplementers identified facilitators. Altogether, 29 barriers and 20 facilitators of implementation were identified related to guidelines; patients; health professionals; incentives and resources; capacity for organizational change; and social, political, and legal factors. The most prevalent barriers were related to incentives and resources, whereas the most prevalent facilitators were related to the capacity for organizational change. Conclusions: A number of barriers and facilitators were identified that could influence the implementation of digital mental health from the perspective of primary care decision makers. Implementers and nonimplementers identified many common barriers and facilitators, but they differ in terms of certain barriers and facilitators. Common and differing barriers and facilitators identified by implementers and nonimplementers may be important to address when planning for the implementation of digital mental health interventions. For instance, financial incentives and disincentives (eg, increased costs) are the most frequently mentioned barrier and facilitator, respectively, by nonimplementers, but not by implementers. One way to facilitate implementation could be to provide more information to nonimplementers about the actual costs related to the implementation of digital mental health.
... One of the greatest challenges to the care economy since the COVID-19 pandemic has been to ensure the health workforce has sufficient capability, knowledge, and skills to deliver digitally enabled healthcare delivery [15][16][17][18]. While technology provides the opportunity for improved health care, health workers are essential for implementing the technology into productive use [6,19,20]. Yet, the availability of digital health technologies has arguably accelerated beyond current levels of care workforce digital capability [13,21]. For example, there have been rapid advances in "online" emergency department triaging, mobile health applications, wearable sensors for remote monitoring, smart homes, and artificial intelligence and machine learning for predictive risk stratification [22]. ...
Article
Full-text available
There is a need to ensure that healthcare organisations enable their workforces to use digital methods in service delivery. This study aimed to evaluate the current level of digital understanding and ability in nursing, midwifery, and allied health workforces and identify some of the training requirements to improve digital literacy in these health professionals. Representatives from eight healthcare organizations in Victoria, Australia participated in focus groups. Three digital frameworks informed the focus group topic guide that sought to examine the barriers and enablers to adopting digital healthcare along with training requirements to improve digital literacy. Twenty-three participants self-rated digital knowledge and skills using Likert scales and attended the focus groups. Mid-range scores were given for digital ability in nursing, midwifery, and allied health professionals. Focus group participants expressed concern over the gap between their organizations’ adoption of digital methods relative to their digital ability, and there were concerns about cyber security. Participants also saw a need for the inclusion of consumers in digital design. Given the widening gap between digital innovation and health workforce digital capability, there is a need to accelerate digital literacy by rapidly deploying education and training and policies and procedures for digital service delivery.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.