Article

Democracy promotion under populist rule? The case of Poland’s democracy aid in Ukraine

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

The credibility of democracy promotion provided by countries experiencing democratic backsliding has raised many doubts lately. The goal of this exploratory paper is to examine Poland’s efforts to promote democracy through foreign aid in Ukraine. I find that after winning the elections in 2015, the populist government in Poland started to transform democracy aid both at the level of development cooperation policy and in practice in Ukraine, one of the biggest beneficiaries of Polish aid. Rather than explicitly questioning or limiting aid as an instrument of democracy promotion, support for civil society and human rights has been reduced, and the involvement of Polish NGOs, especially those strongly committed to transferring democratic values abroad, declined. Such changes are perceived as another layer of Poland’s democratic backsliding rooted in the anti-pluralism of the Law and Justice party. Thus, this paper enriches the debate on populism by showing the latter’s effects on democracy promotion.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... Based on semi-structured interviews with representatives from 25 NGOs, the authors report that the majority perceives a worsening political and legal environment for their operations. The named challenges correspond to those mentioned by Monkos (2021), for example, cuts in funding and the granting of privileges to pro-government NGOs. Overall, however, the article offers a slightly optimistic perspective on the adaptation processes the NGOs have initiated. ...
Article
International democracy promotion has been facing various challenges for a while. Among those are the decline of democracy and the rise of populism in donor countries. To date, however, there is little knowledge about their impact on democracy promotion. This article introduces a Special Issue that explores these challenges. After a general overview of the topic and consideration of the thematic focus of most contributions to the Special Issue, the introductory article elaborates in more detail on the relationship between populism and democracy promotion. Based on reviews of the debates about populism and democracy on the one hand and populism and foreign policy on the other hand, the article outlines three pathways through which populists may influence democracy promotion: (1) individual states, (2) international organizations and (3) civil society. In addition, the article summarizes the main findings of the contributions to the Special Issue and draws some general conclusions and perspectives for further research.
Research
Full-text available
The executive summary of the report examines the European Union's (EU) approach to democracy support within its foreign policy, questioning how the EU can maintain its role as a normative power amidst shifting priorities and challenges. The report highlights that while the EU is formally committed to promoting democracy, human rights, and the rule of law (as outlined in Article 21 of the EU Treaty), recent trends suggest a decline in its focus on democracy support. Factors include limited effectiveness, domestic political shifts within Europe, critiques from the Global South, and systemic competition from authoritarian powers like China and Russia. Key issues include: The rise of populist radical right parties within the EU, which has influenced Brussels' priorities. Budget cuts and policy adjustments that reduce willingness to support democracy abroad. Perceived double standards in the EU's foreign policy responses, such as its strong stance on Russia's war in Ukraine versus hesitancy in addressing conflicts in the Middle East, undermining its credibility. The report argues for a more holistic approach to democracy support, integrating it with other policy areas. It evaluates this through two criteria: the sincerity of democratic intentions across foreign policies and alignment with people's lived experiences in partner countries. Challenges include ensuring coherence across policies and avoiding reinforcing authoritarian structures when partnering with governments. The report concludes that the EU must recalibrate its strategy to remain a credible democracy advocate. It proposes five actions: Mainstreaming democracy: Integrate democracy objectives across all policy domains with clear indicators to measure impact. Balancing discourse: Acknowledge and mitigate potential harms to democracy from foreign policy actions while engaging local democratic stakeholders. Sustained funding: Prioritize continuous funding for local civil society organizations with enhanced transparency and tracking mechanisms. Joint learning: Incorporate diverse perspectives, including non-Western democratic models, to create a globally resonant understanding of democracy. "Do No Harm" principle: Assess unintended consequences of foreign policies on democratization processes and adjust strategies to foster sustainable outcomes sensitive to local contexts. The report emphasizes that these measures are essential for the EU to reinforce its relevance and credibility as a global supporter of democracy amidst an evolving geopolitical landscape.
Article
Full-text available
This article assesses the effectiveness of Poland’s development cooperation as a tool for realising the role of democracy (and broader – transition experiences) exporter. The assessment implements and adapts the framework presented by Justyna Zając, who indicated that an evaluation of the effectiveness of the international role must consider the rationality of its adopted concept, the feasibility and consistency of its implementation and the degree of its approval by other participants in international relations.
Book
Full-text available
The research problem of this publication is one of the key issues of theory and practice of the contemporary international relations, that is, the impact of a given subject on its surroundings in order to change it in accordance with its own preferences. The analysis has been made based on the example of the European Union which exploits the resources of soft power understood as the system of values, cultural identity and political activities undertaken towards the Eastern Partnership states. Simultaneously, a controversial issue of political and cultural effectiveness of the European Union has been discussed - identified as its soft power in the activities involving the eastern neighbourhood in the post-Soviet region. The main assumption constituting the general thesis of the publication is the view that soft power is of key importance in the policy of the European Union in relation to the indicated region. This finds its reflection not only at the stage of conceptualization of an approach to the sensitive neighbourhood, but also in its implementation. The introduction of such a policy, also resulting from the lack of well-functioning hard power background, mainly manifests in the use of non-power and non-compulsory instruments. The research problem recognized in this way is multi-dimensional. Firstly, it focuses on the dynamics of power in the contemporary international relationships, and more specifically, on the growth of its soft components. Secondly, it concerns the hybrid subject: the European Union as a normative, civil or peaceful power studied in the period when it has to struggle with the difficulties of its present and future functioning. Thirdly, the problem touches the post- Soviet area facing the complex intra-national processes determined by the changeable geopolitical influences resulting in the status of the international order, especially in its European space. The three-layer approach to the research problem has been adapted. Soft power is thus analyzed as: 1) the concept of acting (the layer of thought), 2) the type of political practice (empirical layer), 3) the subject of research. Soft power is interpreted as not only as a sphere of reality with its implementation in the scope of the European Union but also as a research instrument. Thus, the paper separates the elements being close to each other. The term of soft power has been used as an idea combining the whole of the research work, a sort of theoretical skeleton and conceptualization of the European Union policy towards the Eastern Partnership states. On the other hand, soft power is recognized as the method of conduct and implementation of foreign policy by the European Union in practice. The European Union, as an exceptional organization, in the realm of international relationships bases majority of its activities on the soft instruments such as: spread of values and rules of the international law, leadership in the area of knowledge and communication, conduct of multilateral diplomacy, developmental and humanitarian aid, developing political and economic cooperation, etc. Thus, the approach of soft power becomes a part of the mainstream of the search of the European Union uniqueness in the international space. It has the biggest and the most general term capacity among other theories (civil, normative and transformational power). Due to this, it constitutes a unique common denominator for the whole group of related research approaches to the phenomenon of the European Union as it accurately includes characteristic features of its foreign policy. Moreover, soft power in this paper is treated as a separate subject of research, which for a long time has been a subject of analysis by numerous theoreticians of international relationships. The term of soft power is not a new phenomenon, however, lately it has been more and more frequently applied to explain processes in theory and practice. It is strictly connected with trans-national and liberal stream in the theory of international relationships. Currently, researchers pay more attention to the resources of soft power and “soft” behavior of state subjects as well as specific subjects such as non-governmental and international organizations (the European Union) in international relationships. The basic aim of this monograph is the analysis of soft power of a unique subject, that is the European Union in its policy towards the states of the Eastern Partnership. The detailed aims involve: identification of priorities, potential and resources, as well as spatial range and instruments. In the empirical dimension – the exercise and effects of soft power in the policy of the European Union with special attention paid to effectiveness and limitations of its use. The prospects determining the directions of the evolution of soft power in the EU policy in the discussed region are the complementation of aims formulated in this way. The core constitutes theoretical determinations concerning the subject matter of soft power in international relationships. The term of soft power has been defined in order to achieve this. The parameters of soft power have been also further clarified: its sources, administrators, resources and forms and methods of its use. It shall be noted that the evolution of power is strictly correlated with the changes in the international environment, which in a way creates the background for the implementation of power. In order to clarify the parameters of soft power and the full picture of its use, the reasons generating its evolution have been analyzed. Furthermore, the book also identifies the potential of the European Union as a unique hybrid structure using soft power. The attempt has been made to answer a question what kind of power the European Union remains when taking into considerations the changes that have taken place in the area of international relationships and processes of the European integration in both theoretical and practical aspect. Finally, in the context of the use of soft power, the analysis has been made concerning the attributes, or resources of attractiveness of soft power of the European Union as a specific actor, and particularly the manifestations of its implementation in the foreign policy. According to J. S. Nye’s classification, they involve: European values and culture and foreign policy implemented on the basis of these values and principles. In this publication, the analysis of the specifics of the subject of soft power use by the European Union has been also made concerning the geopolitical area of six states embraced by the initiative of the Eastern Partnership. The starting point was to determine the policy of the European Union towards the region involving the aims, assumptions and reasons of the EU interest in this part of Europe. The use of soft power is undoubtedly one of these elements. The priority here was not mere study concerning the indicated area but rather what is characteristic for this area from the perspective of soft power preferred by the European Union. The analysis of instruments and forms of the use of soft power of the European Union towards the states of the Eastern Partnership has led to the evaluation of effectiveness, that is the ability to adapt to the EU influence by the states – addresses. The intention behind this idea was to identify the factors determining the efficiency of the EU soft power – as “the power of patterns” in the region. The factors which weaken the EU soft power have also received some attention in the book. They mainly involve those which stem from the external environment – especially the policy of Russia while the second group consists of internal factors resulting from overlapping crises undermining the attractiveness of the European integration. The final analysis concerns the prospects of further directions of evaluation, potential trends and tendencies conditioning the future soft power of the European Union in the region.
Article
Full-text available
This article examines how the emergence of ‘illiberal democracy’ in Hungary and Poland has impacted the behaviour of these two countries in the EU’s international development policy making processes. Adapting Hirschmann’s concepts of voice, exit and loyalty, the article argues that three factors may have undermined the loyalty of these member states towards EU development policy, increasing the likelihood of them using more extreme forms of voice (vetoes) or even enact partial exits from the policy area. Erosion of loyalty is seen to be more likely if (1) illiberalism actually impacts bilateral development policies in the two countries; (2) they have poor track records in influencing EU development policy; and (3) alternatives to EU level action emerge. Applying this framework, a greater erosion of loyalty is expected in the case of Hungary than for Poland. Hungary’s recent actions in EU development policy are in line with the expectations from the framework: it has increasingly been using more extreme forms of voice following the 2015 refugee crisis, while Poland has been a less ‘problematic’ member state in the policy area.
Article
Full-text available
Ethnopopulism is an elite strategy for winning votes and concentrating power – a common playbook for the erosion of liberal democracy that is empowered and justified by a companion playbook of ethnopopulist and majoritarian appeals. Ethnopopulism is flexible with the truth, and flexible in identifying friends and enemies of “the people”. Ethnopopulist parties manipulate opposition to neo-liberal economic policies and racialize the immigrant threat. Democratic backsliding has unexpectedly taken hold in Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic, and the very factors that seemed to augur well for liberal democracy may have contained the seeds of its degradation at the hands of ethnopopulist leaders.
Article
Full-text available
Ruling right-wing populist parties in Europe have significantly changed foreign policies and advanced criticism against core values of liberal democracy, including dismissive stances vis-à-vis the European Union. This paper argues that the reorientation of foreign policies in Hungary and Poland is consistent with ideas developed by incumbent populist right-wing parties and intellectuals of statecraft in the wider conservative movement supporting them. The contribution studies the foreign policy conceptions of right-wing forces and builds on critical geopolitics to trace these back to ideas shaped in broader right-wing networks that have played leading roles in developing a right-wing ideological alternative to liberalism.
Article
Full-text available
As a result of various crises, the European Union (EU) witnessed the rise of Eurosceptic and/or populist parties in its member states. However, the link between Euroscepticism and populism remains under-theorized, and the East-Central European (ECE) region is still surprisingly under-studied. This paper aims to fill these gaps by studying the development of Eurosceptic populist narratives in Hungary and Poland. Connecting the literature on Euroscepticism and the ideational approach to populism, it is shown through Orbán’s and Kaczyński’s discourses how (1) the EU is equated with ‘the corrupt elite’ that stands in conflict with ‘the pure people’, the Hungarians and Poles, and (2) how the EU is claimed to act against the notion of popular sovereignty. While the article highlights differences between the Eurosceptic populist narratives of the two party leaders, a politically driven ‘anti-imperialist’ theme prevails in both cases, which differentiates them from their Western-European counterparts as well.
Article
Full-text available
Recent developments show that Poland’s anti-gender campaigns, initiated around 2012 by the Polish Catholic Church and ultraconservative organisations, will continue into the next parliamentary term. While the right-wing populist Law and Justice party has made attacks on ‘gender ideology’ a key element of the critique of individualism and neoliberal globalisation, anti-gender rhetoric is also today being adopted by neo-fascists, who combine a desire to maintain a gender hierarchy and hatred towards ‘sexual degenerates’ with anti-European Union sentiments and Islamophobia.
Article
Full-text available
The main objective of the presented paper is to provide an overview of references to the term good change (Polish: dobra zmiana) in the context of its discoursive evolution. The expression was first introduced into the Polish discourse during the parliamentary campaign of the Law and Justice party (PiS) before the election of October 25, 2015. In the periods following its introduction — during the first year of the Law and Justice government (10.26.2015–10.26.2016), and after one year until now (10.27.2016–6.09.2017) — the phrase has gained new meaning. The analysis is based on fifty examples of the usage of the expression good change featured in various articles published online. Nevertheless, apart from online articles — which constitute the majority of the analyzed material — the paper includes also entries on TV channels’ or news agencies’ webportals, and anecdotal uses.
Article
Full-text available
A key feature of thin populist ideology is a sharp division of the social world into “good people” and “bad elites.” Populist ideology “thickens” when it is combined with another ideology, for instance, when this basic distinction is formulated in terms of a nativist or religious discourse with the aim of defining “aliens” or “enemies.” Ideological thickening of populism is boosted by and contributes to the cultural process we call symbolic thickening. Thin symbolic systems, congruent with some forms of populism, have relatively few symbols with rather simple connotations, are amenable to many interpretations, and are thus potentially attractive to a large group of people. They can be “thickened” by adding new symbols and suggesting tight interrelations between them. The resulting “thick” symbolic system offers a narrower definition of collective identity and thus attracts a narrower group of people. Our central argument is that a powerful cultural-political feedback loop has emerged in Poland. A gradual symbolic thickening of the Polish public culture through the intensification of Catholic and nationalist discourses resulted in the expansion of the discursive opportunity structure. This produced conditions conducive to the thickening of populist ideologies and helped to increase the legitimacy of populist movements and parties. The rising legitimacy and popularity of the increasingly vigorous “thick” populism, in turn, contributed to the further symbolic thickening of public culture. The argument is based on detailed descriptions and interpretations of four performances and visual displays.
Article
Full-text available
Democratic backsliding in Central Europe has so far been most acute in Hungary and Poland, states once considered frontrunners in democratisation. In this paper, we explore to what extent developments in another key frontrunner, the Czech Republic, fit initial patterns of Hungarian/Polish backsliding. Our analysis centres on the populist anti-corruption ANO movement, led by the billionaire Andrej Babiš, which became the largest Czech party in October 2017 after winning parliamentary elections. We find that while ANO has more limited electoral support than illiberal governing parties in Poland and Hungary and lacks a powerful nationalist narrative, common tactics and forms of concentrating power can be identified, albeit with crucial differences of timing and sequencing.
Article
Full-text available
The paper examines the democracy aid practices of the Czech Republic and Poland in Georgia. These two countries have recently emerged as promoters of democracy, and have argued that their own transition experience puts them in a unique position to support democratization and the consolidation of democracy in the EU's Eastern Neighbourhood. The paper evaluates how these two countries provide democracy aid to Georgia along three criteria, derived from the aid effectiveness literature: supporting locally driven change, learning from results and coordination. The results indicate that both countries have plenty of space to improve the way their democracy aid is delivered. Neither country has formal systems in place to ensure that they actually support Georgian priorities; evaluations are ad hoc and feedback loops missing; and there is significant scope to improve coordination with other donors. Nonetheless, there seems to be a general perception among stakeholders that the democracy aid provided by the Czech Republic and Poland is relevant to Georgia's needs.
Article
Full-text available
During the last two decades, scholars from a variety of disciplines have argued that civil society is structurally deficient in postcommunist countries. Yet why have the seemingly strong, active and mobilised civic movements of the transition period become so weak after democracy was established? And why have there been diverging political trajectories across the postcommunist space if civil society structures were universally weak? This article uses a new, broader range of data to show that civil societies in Central and Eastern European countries are not as feeble as commonly assumed. Many postcommunist countries possess vigorous public spheres and active civil society organisations strongly connected to transnational civic networks able to shape domestic policies. In a series of time-series cross-section models, the article shows that broader measures of civic and social institutions are able to predict the diverging transition paths among postcommunist regimes, and in particular the growing gap between democratic East Central Europe and the increasingly authoritarian post-Soviet space.
Article
Full-text available
The 2015 victory of Poland's Law and Justice (PiS) party is an example of the rise of contemporary authoritarian populism. The PiS's rise can be attributed to a cultural backlash against “long-term ongoing social change”,and not,as the “Poland in ruins” theory holds,against trenchant inequality or downward mobility. In spite of its limited core electorate and by virtue of a number of distinct factors,the PiS gained a parliamentary absolute majority; it has since drawn on this majority to dismantle democratic checks and balances. The PiS's policies have led to intensifying xenophobia,aggressive nationalism,and unprecedented polarisation that have engendered deep splits within Polish society and have given rise to social protest movements not seen in Poland since 1989. © 2016 National Endowment for Democracy and Johns Hopkins University Press.
Article
Quantitative data about political violence are frequently based on “desk research,” data derived from secondary sources that do not require direct contact between researchers and participants, such as people who witnessed or experienced violence. The research that employs these data is often viewed implicitly as ethically uncomplicated. In contrast, we argue that the production and analysis of political violence data coded from secondary sources require careful ethical deliberation regarding human subjects concerns. We consider two broad classes of quantitative political violence data often gathered through desk research: incident lists and indices. For both types, we identify ethical concerns about how data production and use can affect research participants. We conclude by offering a series of suggestions on how to incorporate ethical considerations about human subjects into the design and evaluation of political violence research based on secondary sources.
Article
This essay discusses the lessons of thirty years of postcommunist politics for our understanding of the relationship between civil society and regime change. It identifies four different modalities of civil society – insurgent, institutionalized, uncivil and firewall – and discusses each in detail with illustrations from post-communist politics. It shows how the politics of the region has been a fertile field of study for innovation in contemporary understandings of civil society in comparative politics.
Article
Since 2015, the Law and Justice (Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, PiS) governments in Poland have engineered a revolt against the post-1989 ‘liberal consensus' and a shift towards a regime rooted in executive aggrandisement, populism and nativism. In this article, we contextualise this shift in terms of a persistent ‘metapolitical’ dispute over the legitimacy of political actors and the contestability of certain areas of policy. PiS claims to be reintroducing pluralism to a Polish politics dominated by monistic technocratic liberalism. In response, the party has implemented a series of changes entrenching an even more exclusionist form of monism. Whilst economic policies have empowered social groups that felt excluded from post-1989 reforms, nativist cultural policies and colonisation of the political-institutional infrastructure have militated against the pluralist understanding of politics as structured disagreement. We conclude that Polish politics remains dominated not by disagreements over policy, but by the metapolitical question of who has the right to govern Poland.
Chapter
Human Rights in a Time of Populism - edited by Gerald L. Neuman April 2020
Book
This book addresses important and under-researched issues such as, the role of young people in democratization processes, the role of new democracies in sharing their transition experience, and the effectiveness of aid. A major theme of the book is democracy assistance efforts by the NGOs from Central and Eastern Europe to support young people in Eastern Europe, the Western Balkans, and Central Asia. It examines this theme in a comparative perspective and with a deeper analysis of reasons and ways to support young people, the need to support them and the effectiveness of these efforts. Bringing together a wide range of material on democracy assistance of Central and Eastern European countries that includes surveying the providers and beneficiaries of aid and looking for better methods of impact evaluation, the book advances a framework for assessing democracy assistance efforts. It concludes with implications of the impact of democracy assistance on young people and democracy diffusion from Central and Eastern European democracies to other countries. This text will be of key interest to scholars and students of democracy, democratization, Central and Eastern Europe, Post-Soviet studies, and European and Comparative Politics, as well as for practitioners (donors, NGOs) who want to know what works best, and why and when in aid provision.
Article
This essay introduces contributions to a special issue of East European Politics on “Rethinking democratic backsliding in Central and Eastern Europe”, which seeks to expand the study of democratic regression in CEE beyond the paradigmatic cases of Hungary and Poland. Reviewing these contributions, we identify several directions for research: 1) the need to critique “democratic backsliding”, not simply as a label, but also as an assumed regional trend; 2) a need to better integrate the role of illiberal socio-economic structures such as oligarchical structures or corrupt networks; and 3) a need to (re-)examine the trade-offs between democratic stability and democratic quality. We also note how insights developed researching post-communist regions such as Western Balkans or the post-Soviet space could usefully inform work on CEE backsliding. We conclude by calling for the study of CEE democracy to become more genuinely interdisciplinary, moving beyond some narrowly institutionalist comparative political science assumptions.
Book
The Great Recession, institutional dysfunction, a growing divide between urban and rural prospects, and failed efforts to effectively address immigration have paved the way for a populist backlash that disrupts the postwar bargain between political elites and citizens. Whether today's populism represents a corrective to unfair and obsolete policies or a threat to liberal democracy itself remains up for debate. Yet this much is clear: these challenges indict the triumphalism that accompanied liberal democratic consolidation after the collapse of the Soviet Union. To respond to today's crisis, good leaders must strive for inclusive economic growth while addressing fraught social and cultural issues, including demographic anxiety, with frank attention. Although reforms may stem the populist tide, liberal democratic life will always leave some citizens unsatisfied. This is a permanent source of vulnerability, but liberal democracy will endure so long as citizens believe it is worth fighting for.
Article
Based on a comparative analysis of the ideological and policy tools of illiberal ruling parties in Hungary and Poland, this paper makes the case that the 21st century Central European illiberal transformation is a process deeply reliant on gender politics, and that a feminist analysis is central to understanding the current regime changes, both in terms of their ideological underpinnings, and with respect to their modus operandi. It argues that: 1. opposition to the liberal equality paradigm has become a key ideological space where the illiberal alternative to the post-1989 (neo)liberal project is being forged; 2. family mainstreaming and anti-gender policies have been one of the main pillars on which the illiberal state has been erected, and through which security, equality and human rights have been redefined; 3. illiberal transformation operates through the appropriation of key concepts, tools and funding channels of liberal equality politics which have been crucial to women's rights. The article describes some new and distinct challenges illiberal governance poses to the women's rights, feminist civil society and emancipatory politics in Hungary and Poland.
Book
This book theorizes a mechanism underlying regime-change waves, the deliberate efforts of diffusion entrepreneurs to spread a particular regime and regime-change model across state borders. Why do only certain states and nonstate actors emerge as such entrepreneurs? Why, how, and how effectively do they support regime change abroad? To answer these questions, the book studies the entrepreneurs behind the third wave of democratization, with a focus on the new eastern European democracies - members of the European Union. The study finds that it is not the strongest democracies nor the democracies trying to ensure their survival in a neighborhood of nondemocracies that become the most active diffusion entrepreneurs. It is, instead, the countries where the organizers of the domestic democratic transitions build strong solidarity movements supporting the spread of democracy abroad that do. The book also draws parallels between their activism abroad and their experiences with democratization and democracy assistance at home.
Article
Democratic backsliding (meaning the state-led debilitation or elimination of the political institutions sustaining an existing democracy) has changed dramatically since the Cold War. Open-ended coups d’état, executive coups, and blatant election-day vote fraud are declining while promissory coups, executive aggrandizement and strategic electoral manipulation and harassment are increasing. Contemporary forms of backsliding are especially vexing because they are legitimated by the very institutions democracy promoters prioritize but, overall, backsliding today reflects democracy’s advance and not its retreat. The current mix of backsliding is more easily reversible than the past mix and successor dictatorships are shorter-lived and less authoritarian.
Article
The role of Western NGOs in the transition of postcommunist nations to democracy has been well documented. In this study, Paulina Pospieszna follows a different trajectory, examining the role of a former aid recipient (Poland), newly democratic itself, and its efforts to aid democratic transitions in the neighboring states of Belarus and Ukraine.
Article
Polish voters are becoming increasingly polarized as parties compete to mobilize different constituencies.
Article
Two distinct approaches to international democracy assistance have emerged in recent years: the political approach and the developmental approach. They vary with respect to their underlying conceptions of democracy and democratization and their methods and areas of focus. U.S. democracy promotion makes use of both approaches; European democracy support efforts largely favor the developmental approach. Neither approach is necessarily preferable overall; both have multiple strengths and weaknesses. The existence of two core approaches is evidence that democracy aid is diversifying to adapt to a more challenging international political landscape. Democracy-aid providers are moving away from one-size-fits-all strategies and are adapting their programs to diverse political contexts. Two distinct overall approaches to assisting democracy have emerged in response.
Article
The populist backlash in Central and Eastern Europe reveals the absence in the new democracies of checks and balances and of truly independent media to serve as a counterweight to creeping authoritarianism. It also shows the return of dormant strands in the region's political culture and thus its potential vulnerability to the authoritarian temptation. These developments are contributing to widespread estrangement from the postenlargement EU in the older member states. If current trends continue, with new members backsliding on democratic practice while pursuing a strident defense of "national interests," we could see internal EU ties loosen to the point where the Union becomes little more than an enhanced free-trade zone.
Article
The concept of populism has in recent years inspired much debate and much confusion. It has been described variously as a pathology, a style, a syndrome and a doctrine. Others have raised doubts as to whether the term has any analytical utility, concluding that it is simply too vague to tell us anything meaningful about politics. Drawing on recent developments in the theoretical literature, it is argued that populism should be regarded as a ‘thin’ ideology which, although of limited analytical use on its own terms, nevertheless conveys a distinct set of ideas about the political which interact with the established ideational traditions of full ideologies.
Article
Abstract Since the 1980s the rise of so-called ‘populist parties’ has given rise to thousands of books, articles, columns and editorials. This article aims to make a threefold contribution to the current debate on populism in liberal democracies. First, a clear and new definition of populism is presented. Second, the normal-pathology thesis is rejected; instead it is argued that today populist discourse has become mainstream in the politics of western democracies. Indeed, one can even speak of a populist Zeitgeist. Third, it is argued that the explanations of and reactions to the current populist Zeitgeist are seriously flawed and might actually strengthen rather than weaken it.
Article
Populism, understood as an appeal to ‘the people’ against both the established structure of power and the dominant ideas and values, should not be dismissed as a pathological form of politics of no interest to the political theorist, for its democratic pretensions raise important issues. Adapting Michael Oakeshott's distinction between ‘the politics of faith’ and ‘the politics of scepticism’, the paper offers an analysis of democracy in terms of two opposing faces, one ‘pragmatic’ and the other ‘redemptive’, and argues that it is the inescapable tension between them that makes populism a perennial possibility.
Odwołanie prezesa i rady FSM to zły krok [The Dismissal of the FSM President and Board is a Wrong Move
  • Bazyl
Bazyl, Jan (2017) 'Odwołanie prezesa i rady FSM to zły krok [The dismissal of the FSM President and board is a wrong move]', <https://publicystyka.ngo.pl/odwolanieprezesa-i-rady-fsm-to-zly-krok>, accessed 25 July 2020
Poland: country report for nations in transit
  • Aamma Wójcik
  • Pospieszna Paulina
The growth of non-governmental development organisations in Poland and their cooperation with Polish aid
  • Galia Chimiak
Chimiak, Galia (2016) The growth of non-governmental development organisations in Poland and their cooperation with Polish aid (Warsaw: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk)
Illiberal challenge to liberal democracy: the case of Poland
  • Kubik
Kubik, Jan (2012) 'Illiberal challenge to liberal democracy: the case of Poland', Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 8:2, 79-89
Dyskursywna ewolucja wyra _ zenia dobra zmiana [Discursive evolution of the phrase good change
  • Olga Łabendowicz
Łabendowicz, Olga (2018) 'Dyskursywna ewolucja wyra _ zenia dobra zmiana [Discursive evolution of the phrase good change]', Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Linguistica, 52, 163-178
European endowment for democracy -Supporting the unsupported
  • Maria Ligor
Ligor, Maria (2014) 'European endowment for democracy -Supporting the unsupported', Europolity, 8:2, 63-83
What happened to Poland? One the ongoing crisis of democracy
  • Clara M Moder
Moder, Clara M (2019) 'What happened to Poland? One the ongoing crisis of democracy' in Ulrike Gu erot and Michael Hunklinger (eds) Old and new cleavages in Polish society (Krems: Danube University of Krems), 13-26
The populist Zeitgeist', Government and Opposition
  • Cas Mudde
Mudde, Cas (2004) 'The populist Zeitgeist', Government and Opposition, 39:4, 541-563
Wieloletni program wsp ołpracy rozwojowej na lata
Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2015). Wieloletni program wsp ołpracy rozwojowej na lata 2016-2020 [Multiannual development cooperation programme 2016-2020] (Warsaw: Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
Poland: Country Report for Nations in
  • Aamma Wójcik
  • Rupnik Jacques