ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

This contribution suggests that community-based tourism (CBT) can create commercial and social value to destinations, local businesses as well as to residents. At the same time, it clarifies that CBT offers rich, immersive cultural experiences that can enhance the tourists’ experiences when visiting different communities. It posits that sustainable CBT approaches can improve the local economic development (LED) of communities by reducing economic leakages from the tourism industry. It explains that there is scope for destination managers and tourism businesses to engage in sustainable tourism practices and to utilize local resources, in a strategic manner, in order to maximize linkages in their economy. In conclusion, this paper puts forward a theoretical model that clearly illustrates the business case to implement sustainable CBT strategies. It also implies that these strategies can ultimately result in opportunities for economic growth of tourism businesses and may increase the competitiveness of destinations, whilst safeguarding the environment and addressing their carrying capacities.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Advancing community-based tourism approaches for the sustainable
development of destinations
By Mtapuri, O.
, Camilleri, M.A.
Dlużewska, A.
Suggested Citation: Mtapuri, O., Camilleri, M.A. & Dłużewska, A. (2021). Advancing community-based
tourism approaches for the sustainable development of destinations. Sustainable Development,
This is a prepublication version.
This contribution suggests that community-based tourism (CBT) can create commercial and
social value to destinations, local businesses as well as to residents. At the same time, it clarifies
that CBT offers rich, immersive cultural experiences that can enhance the tourists’ experiences
when visiting different communities. It posits that sustainable CBT approaches can improve
the local economic development (LED) of communities by reducing economic leakages from
the tourism industry. It explains that there is scope for destination managers and tourism
businesses to engage in sustainable tourism practices and to utilize local resources, in a
strategic manner, in order to maximize linkages in their economy. In conclusion, this paper
puts forward a theoretical model that clearly illustrates the business case to implement
sustainable CBT strategies. It also implies that these strategies can ultimately result in
opportunities for economic growth of tourism businesses and may increase the competitiveness
of destinations, whilst safeguarding the environment and addressing their carrying capacities.
Keywords: Community-based tourism; sustainable tourism; carrying capacity, supply,
Corporate Social Responsibility; CSR.
School of Built Environment and Development Studies, University of KwaZulu Natal, South Africa, E-
Department of Corporate Communication, Faculty of Media and Knowledge Sciences, University of Malta, Malta.
The Business School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, U.K.
Anna Dłużewska (Dłużewska, A.), Department of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Uniwersytet Marii Curie
Skłodowskiej, Lublin, Poland. Email:
Tourism is an important pillar for the economy of many countries and localities
around the world. However, at times, social, economic, environmental and cultural aspects
can have a negative effect on destinations, resulting in substantial losses to the tourism
sector and to its associated beneficiaries (Caday-Fillone & Villanueva, 2019:4, Dłużewska
2018; Dłużewska & Giampiccoli, 2020). Therefore, tourism businesses ought to
continuously monitor the latest developments in their marketing environment. The positive
influences of tourism and its multiplier effects do not happen automatically. The tourism
industry relies on the development of other sectors in the local economy (Terzioglu &
Gokovali, 2016:717) and on the socio-economic conditions of other countries (Wiranatha,
Antara & Suryawardani, 2017:2). In some cases, particularly in developing countries, the
tourism receipts may have no impact on the local economies and their growth prospects, if
the revenue that is generated by tourism will be utilized to invest in improving the
destinations’ infrastructure and resources (Chirenje et al., 2013:9; see also Garrigós Simón,
Galdón Salvador & Gil-Pechuán, 2015:725). Notwithstanding, various countries must
import goods and services to be in a position to offer their tourism products. As a result,
many destinations may experience certain “economic leakages” in their gross tourism
earnings (UNWTO, 2002).
Financial leakages may occur when a disproportionately low percentage of tourism
revenues remains in the local market, thereby reducing the positive effects of tourism.
Leakages can vary from 10% to 70% and up to 80% in places such as the Caribbean
(Wiranatha, Antara & Suryawardani, 2017:3). In contrast, “linkages” are conspicuous with
the utilization of local goods and services. Economic linkages may lead to the creation of
more jobs and opportunities for small and medium sized businesses (UNWTO, 2002:11).
Tourism and hospitality enterprises necessitate different resources to operate their
businesses. Very often, the products they need, cannot always be acquired from local
businesses. Hence, they may have to import them to provide an adequate level of service
to their consumers. Their expenses can cause significant leakages from the economy
(Terzioglu & Gokovali, 2016:717). Food imports represent a very significant leakage in
the hotel sector, such as in Jamaica, where foreign exchange leakages relating to food
purchases were estimated to hover around 50% (Terzioglu & Gokovali, 2016:717).
The hotel industry’s costs and expenses resulting from such leakages can lower the
multiplier effects of tourism. Consequentially, some destinations may experience reduced
linkages in their economy as they lack appropriate resources (Cheer, Pratt, Tolkach, Bailey,
Taumoepeau & Movono, 2018:450). The leakages in the tourism sector are usually
prevalent in poorer economies, in those that are not in a position to respond to the ongoing
demands of the sector (Chirenje et al., 2013:9). On the other hand, linkages represent the
procurement of goods and services that are derived from other sub-sectors from the local
economy (Spinrad, Seward & Bélisle, 1982:22). The practical strategy for many countries
that are aspiring to build their tourism destination, is to invest in fostering the right
environment for linkages with local businesses (suppliers), in order to enhance their
economic development and competitiveness (UNWTO, 2002:11). For example, the
tourism-agriculture linkages, among others, can prevent economic leakages and increase
food security (Thomas, Moore & Edwards, 2018:147).
National government together with the private sector could allocate resources toward
LED and CBT initiatives to trigger business activity in tourist destinations, that will
ultimately create jobs and economic growth (Nel & Binns, 2002; Sara, 1993:139). LED is
a territorial-based, sustainable tourism approach. It focuses on creating social and
economic opportunities for local communities and enterprises (Rodríguez-Pose &
Tijmstra, 2010: 38). However, the growth of tourism destinations may be limited by their
respective carrying capacities (Sabokkhiz et al., 2016:105).
The concept of carrying capacity combines “social, economic and environmental
dimensions” and includes physical carrying capacity, social carrying capacity and
economic carrying capacity (Pasko, 2016:166). Marsiglio (2017) suggested that carrying
capacity refers to the maximum number of tourists that can visit a destination during a
specified period. The author implied that the benefits from tourism must outweigh its costs
to be sustainable. Arguably, tourism can have a detrimental effect on the natural
environment as tourists utilize the destinations’ infrastructures, including transportation
facilities and utilities like water and electricity. They also consume resources and generate
waste. Hence, the tourists as well as the tourism and hospitality businesses have a
responsibility to bear for their externalities to the environment. This argumentation is
consistent with the corporate social responsibility (CSR) discourse (Camilleri, 2019).
CSR can be defined as “the businesses’ responsibility toward society and the
environment” (Farmaki, 2019; Camilleri, 2012). Businesses, including tourism companies
may be intrigued to engage in CSR if their responsible behaviors add value to society as
well as to their company’s financial results (Camilleri, 2020). Therefore, strategic CSR
practices can increase linkages (whilst decreasing leakages) in the economy. They can also
address issues relating to carrying capacity (Kennel, 2016; Marsilio, 2017).
Before the outbreak of COVID-19, a surge in tourism has exceeded the
environmental or social carrying capacity of many destinations (OECD, 2020:96). In this
light, this contribution proposes a new approach to sustainable CBT, that relies on strategic
CSR practices, and on the destinations’ allocation of resources to enhance their carrying
capacity and increase economic linkages. This research suggests that tourism businesses
can engage in responsible initiatives that are meant to facilitate linkages and reduce
leakages from dispersed supply chains. It is on this basis that this article advances a
different approach to carrying capacity (Farrington et al., 2017; de Grosbois, 2012;
Idahosa, 2019; Lund-Durlacher, 2015; Kasim, 2006; Coles, Fenclova & Dinan, 2013) that
is linked to the concept of CBT and strategic CSR perspectives. In sum, it suggests that
CBT can be reconceived to increase linkages and LED. To the best of our knowledge there
are no other contributions that have integrated CBT with strategic CSR behaviors that can
add value to the economy and to local communities. Therefore, this research addresses
this gap in academic literature.
The following section presents a critical review of the relevant literature relating to
the leakages/linkages in the tourism sector. It discusses about their effect on CBT and on
the destinations’ carrying capacity. Afterwards, the researchers put forward a conceptual
model that clarifies that a sustainable CBT approach can address issues relating to the
carrying capacity and to economic development of tourist destinations. Finally, they outline
their implications and identify future research directions to academia.
Background – leakages and linkages in tourism
LED fits well with “community-based development initiatives” (Nel, 2001: 1005)
and with tourism development that has a territorial focus as it is intended to improve the
sustainability of destinations (Rodríguez-Pose & Tijmstra, 2010: 35). In the global context,
there are many countries that have already implemented different measures that led to
significant improvement for their LED (Rodríguez-Pose & Tijmstra, 2010: 35; Nel, 2001).
However, at times, policy makers were not always engaging with the private sector. As a
result, they were not always successful in enhancing the economic linkages with local
business communities. Leakages can have negative effects on the hotel industry, to the
extent that they impede their economic growth and sustainability (Alzboun, Khawaldah,
Backman & Moore, 2016:18).
Common economic leakages may include foreign-controlled multinational firms, the
importation of goods, and the creation of jobs to non-residents (Terzioglu, & Gokovali,
2016:716). Leakages from the economy could involve different industries like building and
construction, financial services, hospitality and/or the manufacturing sectors when they
recruit foreign nationals (Wiranatha, Antara & Suryawardani, 2017:3). The size of the
economic leakages depends on size of the employer. For example, in the hospitality
industry, the larger hotels may usually import executives from other countries, whereas the
smaller hotels tend to employ local employees.
Moreover, foreign owned, luxury hotels will usually import their requirements, as
opposed to locally owned hotels that may procure their food and beverage products from
local suppliers. Terzioglu and Gokovali (2016:718) reported that Indonesian non-star
accommodation establishments sourced their food requirements from local farmers. Other
research confirmed that the larger, high end, foreign-owned accommodation
establishments are creating greater leakages than the smaller, lower end, locally-owned
hospitality enterprises (Hampton, Jeyacheya & Long, 2018; Pratt, Suntikul & Dorji, 2018).
The lack of linkages between tourism businesses and their suppliers, may result in
increases in imports particularly in cases when local products including food, fruit and
vegetables are not available (Terzioglu & Gokovali, 2016:717). Certain food products may
be scarce in the domestic market because of three main reasons: firstly, the local
geographical context of the host destination, in terms of climate and terrain, can have an
effect on the quality and quantity of food items that can be procured by tourism businesses.
For example, bananas cannot be harvested in Greenland, and rhubarb cannot be grown in
Mediterranean areas, unless they are kept in controlled conditions; secondly, specific
human competences/expertise may be required for the production of certain goods and/or
for the delivery of hospitality services that are linked to the tourism market (e.g. certain
destinations are sought by tourists for culinary, wine or oleo tourism products); and thirdly,
specific products may require a huge capital investment outlay, and small businesses and
local entrepreneurs may lack access to finance. These issues can have an effect on certain
destinations’ economic growth and competitiveness.
In addition to the above factors, the size of land that may be developed for tourism,
is another important factor for destination marketers. Small countries like the Maldives,
are restricted by their land size to grow their agricultural products. Small islands may be
limited in their capacities to produce large amounts of fruit and vegetables to cater for local
residents and to their tourists’ needs. Of course, the governments are encouraged to support
businesses to source food requirements, locally. This way, they will be in a position to
procure fresher foods and beverages at convenient prices.
Policy makers can assist the informal sector by educating entrepreneurs about the
benefits of sustainable tourism practices and could encourage them to engage with
stakeholders. The concept of sustainable tourism also underlines the importance of
facilitating community involvement in tourism as local enterprises and even individual
citizens can contribute to their destination’s economic development (Lasso & Dahles,
2018:473). Alzboun et al.’s (2016) study on the effect of sustainability practices on
financial leakages indicated that community participation in the hotel industry is vital to
curb leakages from the local economy. As such, community involvement is increasingly
being regarded as essential for the effectiveness of sustainable tourism planning and
destination management (Eshliki & Kaboudi, 2012:334).
The sustainability of destinations has also been linked to other issues. For instance,
in the context of island states, it is important to ensure that the do not exceed their carrying
capacity. A high influx of tourists beyond the destinations’ capacities can have detrimental
effects on local communities and their natural environments, as they have limited resources
(Sánchez-Cañizares, Castillo-Canalejo & Cabeza-Ramírez, 2018:2). Their long-term
sustainability can be hampered by an inequitable distribution of resources, privatisation of
the commons and by the accumulation of wealth in specific social groups (Boluk, Cavaliere
& Higgins-Desbiolles, 2019). These issues, that are clearly accentuated in foreign-owned,
high-end and larger establishments, may result in economic leakages.
Many tourists are shifting from large hotel chains to smaller accommodation
establishments. They do so as they want to engage in closer relationships with local
communities and with small tourism enterprises (Lindström, 2020). This engagement is
usually mutually beneficial to both parties (Chilufya, Hughes & Scheyvens, 2019).
Community-based tourism
Community-based tourism (CBT) is a strategy that encourages the social
organization of the local communities (López-Guzmán, Borges & Cerezo, 2011). CBT
relies on the inclusion and active engagement of local tourism stakeholders. Local
stakeholders are expected to share their resources and to work together towards common
goals (Strydom, Mangope & Henama, 2017). CBT approaches involve members from the
local community in the decision making relating to tourism development. The “ownership,
management, operation and supervision” of the tourism businesses belong to local
entrepreneurs who are also community members (Arintoko et al., 2020:399; Wijaya,
Hartati & Sumadi, 2020:2; Karacaoğlu & Birdir, 2017:53; Strydom, Mangope & Henama,
2017:1). While being similar to sustainable tourism, CBT is unique in prioritising the
locals’ empowerment in defining their own future (Tasci, Semrad & Yilmaz, 2013:9).
Community-based tourism is also participatory in nature. It transcends confidence and
knowledge building as communities are empowered to chart their trajectory for tourism
development (Tasci, Semrad & Yilmaz, 2013:15; Mearns, 2012:72).
There is a wide plethora of definitions in academia that describe the characteristics
of CBT. Very often, this term is linked to a community including its natural resources and
its local economy (and systems). CBT specifies the objectives that can ultimately improve
the quality of life of local residents (especially to those who belong to vulnerable groups
in society). CBT implies that communities can control and manage their local resources for
their own benefit (Karacaoğlu & Birdir, 2017:59). The objectives of CBT include the
conservation of local communities and of their natural and cultural resources in order to
contribute to their socio-economic development. López-Guzmán, Borges and Cerezo
(2011) contended that CBT can truly enhance the quality of the tourist experiences when
tourism businesses are run by local entrepreneurs. Therefore, CBT is about improving the
local economy for the benefit of the people. At the same time, the CBT notion is also
focused on the preservation of the natural environment (Lee & Jan, 2019:370). Many
researchers contended that CBT raises awareness about the businesses’ responsibility to
engage in responsible tourism practices to safeguard the natural, social and cultural
environments (Wijaya, Hartati & Sumadi, 2020; Jugmohan, Spencer & Steyn, 2016).
Various researchers argued that tourism is dependent on the very same resources it
consumes, therefore tourism marketers should devote special attention to preserve them.
For instance, Mason (2003:31) noted that “natural, man-made and cultural resources that
tourism relies upon are liable to be overconsumed”. Recently, (Dodds, 2020) maintained
that tourism needs to protect the very resources upon which it depends. Local communities
ought to their safeguard their urban and natural environment, culture and traditions, et
cetera. It is in their interest to involve themselves in the decisions about their destination’s
tourism development (Karacaoğlu & Birdir, 2017:53). The duty of the community
members is to conserve the resources in their neighborhood (Martini, 2020:93). They are
responsible to maintain and to care for their resources, for their own benefit, and for those
who will come after them. This implies that communities should be proud of the legacy
that they will leave behind to future generations.
One of the enablers for sustainable CBT development is to limit visitors according
to their carrying capacity (Asker, et al., 2010:4). Okazaki (2008:511) is of the view that a
community participation approach has the potential to reduce the negative impacts on the
communities as they are in the position to limit their capacity to acceptable levels. In plain
words, a sustainable CBT approach entails attracting tourist to a destination, before
reaching its threshold (i.e. its carrying capacity of a locality), without posing detrimental
and/or irreversible damages to both the community, the environment and local cultures.
On the contrary, when tourism development is dependent on external entities like
international hotel chains, they may focus on their bottom lines rather than upholding the
interests of the local communities (Tasci, Semrad & Yilmaz, 2013). Very often, these
pursue mass tourism (and over tourism) strategies that are aimed at increasing their profits.
Therefore, a CBT approach is usually considered to be more sustainable tourist arrivals are
controlled (Prasiasa, et al., 2020:153). It is also intended to reduce the hegemonic
influences of international tour operators (Chaudhary & Lama, 2014:241). Moreover, it
ensures that communities as well as of local enterprises are actively involved in the
development of their destination’s tourism product (Camilleri, 2018; Giampiccoli &
Saayman, 2018).
CBT can alleviate poverty in different communities. It could support the
disadvantaged members in the community, including small businesses and individual
entrepreneurs, with the aim of reducing leakages from the local economy. The development
CBT relies on the communities’ control, ownership and management of local resources,
services and facilities such as accommodation establishments, tourism agencies, and
restaurants; thereby encouraging linkages between different sectors in the local economy.
The contribution of CBT to the economy goes far beyond the tourism sector.
Sustainable CBT approaches can improve the socio-economic development of small
communities and could facilitate the interaction between local communities and their
visitors. Furthermore, CBT raises awareness on environmental protection and promotes the
responsible utilization of resources. Hence, CBT by its nature is intended to reduce the
leakages from the local economy and to address contingent issues relating to their carrying
capacity (Butler, 2020; Caday-Fillone & Villanueva, 2019).
Carrying capacity
The World Tourism Organization defines carrying capacity as “the maximum
number of people that can visit a tourist destination at the same time, without causing
destruction of the physical, economic, sociocultural environment and an unacceptable
decrease in the quality of visitors' satisfaction” (UNWTO 1981: 4).
Therefore, this concept
is related to those strategies, indicators and targets that are intended to limit the volumes
of visitors, in the interest of the environment and of the host communities. Carrying
capacity has evolved from a purely qualitative and normative concept to a more
quantitative topic (Caday-Fillone & Villanueva, 2019:6). Other concepts that are ‘similar’
to carrying capacity include: Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC), Visitor Experience and
Resource Protection (VERP), Visitor Impact Management (VIM), among others (Kennell,
2016:133). These measures illustrate the importance of sustainability in the context of
inbound tourism.
Carrying capacity and sustainability are interrelated and should both be considered
together as “useful concepts and frameworks that are meant to analyze the impacts and
limits of tourism development” (Saarinen, 2006:1125). However, there are many
definitions for both constructs, because of different opinions on culture, nature and their
use as resources (Saarinen, 2006:1126). Sustainability and carrying capacity both “refer to
the scale of tourism activity that can occur in a spatial unit without doing any serious harm
to the natural, economic, and sociocultural elements at destinations” (Saarinen,
2006:1126). However, while sustainability is considered as a global concept, carrying
capacity focuses on the physical, economic, perceptual, social, ecological, and political
contexts of a specific location (Saarinen, 2006; Massiani & Santoro, 2012:143; Kennell,
For instance, socio-economic carrying capacity “may be defined as the total number
of visitors that can be allowed without hindering the other functions that the city performs”
(Massiani & Santoro, 2012:143) or alternatively the economic carrying capacity is related
to the tourists’ maximum use of the destination’s resources, before leading to an
unacceptable level of economic dependency on them (Kennel, 2016). UNWTO (1983)
clarified that an optimum carrying capacity can be reached when the volume of inbound
tourism provides economic benefits to the local community. Hence, there is scope for
tourist destinations to establish their capacity levels in order to yield maximum economic
benefits with a minimal disruption to local cultures and societal well-being. In this context,
WTO (1983) commends that destination marketers ought to investigate how they can use
their resources, competences and capabilities in a strategic and sustainable manner (WTO,
Corporate social responsibility and sustainable tourism
The concepts of environmental sustainability, CSR, and responsible tourism are
interlinked and embedded within each other (Idahosa, 2019). Idahosa (2019: 961)
contended that responsible tourism is related to CSR in the tourism sector. It also borrows
a lot from the sustainable tourism movement which arose following the increased
awareness for sustainable development (Camilleri, 2014; Brundtland, 1989).
The concept of CSR is usually associated with the private sector’s voluntary actions
that are intended to address environmental, social, cultural and economic issues, to improve
relationships with stakeholders (Baniya, Thapa & Kim, 2019:3; see also Coles, Fenclova
& Dinan, 2013:122; Lund-Durlacher, 2015). “CSR is typically integrated into the
organizations’ mission and vision to cover financial, environmental and social aspects”
(Smith & Ong, 2015: 488). Arguably, there is more to CSR that doing good. Several
theoretical underpinnings reported that there is a business case for CSR (Camilleri, 2017).
CSR practices in hotels can be driven by a number of factors including operational
efficiencies and cost savings, societal pressures, profit maximization and brand positioning
(Farmaki, 2019:2297; Camilleri, 2014).
The hotel sector can implement CSR initiatives to promote the ‘triple bottom line’
approach where socio-economic and environmental issues are given equal weight in their
strategies (Farmaki, 2019). This way, they can enhance their firm’s image and boost their
reputation with stakeholders. At times, stakeholders perceive that CSR behaviors are
triggered by opportunistic motives. They may believe that responsible initiatives are
prompted by the businesses’ self-interest rather than by their altruistic motives to pursue
the common good (Randle, Kemperman & Dolnicar, 2019:66). However, many studies
have proved that businesses can do well by doing good. CSR can add value to the
businesses themselves (Camilleri, 2017).
In this light, this contribution suggests that tourism firms can address economic,
environmental, cultural and social dimensions in the communities where they operate their
business, to be successful. These dimensions are mutually reinforcing, as illustrated in
Figure 1.
Figure 1. The links between CSR, carrying capacity and sustainable tourism framework
Although CSR is increasingly being conceptualized as an important element for
sustainable tourism (Martin-Rios, 2020; Moral Moral, Fernández Alles & Sánchez Franco,
2018), very often research reported that owners of accommodation establishments are not
providing appropriate working conditions to their employees (Harris & Pressey, 2021). The
tourism and hospitality industry sectors are major global forces for economic growth and
competitiveness. Therefore, hotel businesses, in particular, ought to engage in responsible
behaviors to improve their relationships with stakeholders, including employees
(Camilleri, 2015). They can support the community through social responsible practices
like sponsorships of cultural, music or sporting events, et cetera, where they operate their
business. Moreover, they should adopt environmentally friendly practices to improve their
operational efficiencies and cost savings, thereby creating competitive advantages (Lund-
Durlacher, 2015:9). Businesses can invest in water and energy conservation. Alternatively,
they can minimize their waste by reusing resources. For example, grey water can be utilized
for irrigation purposes (Scheyvens, 2007:140).
There is scope for governments to raise awareness on the business case for CSR.
Governments must step up with their commitment to the challenge of guaranteeing the
environmental and economic sustainability of the tourism industry (Trong Tuan, 2011;
Dodds et al., 2009). They can incentivize tourism businesses by providing tax credits to
trigger CSR and environmentally-responsible behaviors (Baniya, Thapa & Kim, 2019:9).
Hence, companies could implement laudable practices that will enhance local economic
and social development. At the same, they may be in a better position to invest in
technologies to reduce their environmental impacts (Giampiccoli & Mtapuri, 2020).
Ultimately, it is in the businesses’ self-interest to engage in CSR and environmentally
responsible practices. Various studies confirmed that corporate responsible behaviors can
lead to an increased financial performance (Tien, Anh & Ngoc, 2020; Yim, Bae, Lim &
Kwon, 2019).
Carrying capacity and sustainable tourism
A United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development document (UNCSD
NGO Steering Committee, 1999:4) shed light on the hidden costs and economic leakages
that are conspicuous in the tourism industry. Many countries, particularly those hailing
from the developing economies are losing a significant amount of their revenues due to
economic leakages to foreign-owned businesses. Botswana represents an example of this
phenomenon. This Southern African country is leaking tourism revenues because of its
inability to foster economic linkages by supporting local businesses (Mbaiwa, 2005:164).
While the sector is reportedly ‘a huge driver of pro-poor tourism’, Botswanan firms are
still import physical resources like building materials from other countries as well as human
resources, including employees and executives from other countries (Manwa & Manwa,
2014:5707). Previous research suggested that high economic leakages can jeopardise the
sustainability of the tourism industry (Garrigós Simón, Galdón Salvador & Gil-Pechuán,
2015:725). The level of leakages in a destination is associated with its capacity to supply
goods and services to what the market demands (Garrigós Simón, Galdón Salvador & Gil-
Pechuán, 2015:725).
An increase in capacity can be achieved if the sector attracts an optimum number
of inbound tourists throughout the year, including during the low season and in the shoulder
months. Very often, destinations experience a surge in tourism during their peak season.
Such an imbalance is not sustainable to the host destination. Therefore, the carrying
capacity of destinations ought to be associated with the resources at their disposal. Specific
geographical areas and certain cities cannot sustain a large influx of tourists, although they
may experience demand for their attractions. Tourism marketers should bear in mind that
their destination cannot deliver appropriate services to their visitors if they exceed their
carrying capacity.
In other words, a sustainable carrying capacity model involves identifying a
specified number of visitors that can be supported by a destination’s infrastructure. The
feasibility of such a sustainability model would necessitate appropriate planning,
organization, leadership and control of the destination’s resources.
At the micro level,
tourism businesses are also expected to follow a similar carrying capacity approach. For
example, hotels have to host a sustainable number of guests according to capacity. The
hotel occupancy is constrained by its capacity levels.
Hotel accommodation establishments can use revenue management systems to
better understand, anticipate, and react to market demand. This way can maximize their
revenues. These systems can optimize their fixed, perishable inventory, and time-variable
supply, through dynamic prices (Camilleri, 2018). Hospitality businesses can raise their
prices to reduce demand during certain times of the year (particularly during high seasons).
Their marketing communications could be directed at
quality tourists who are willing to pay
more for their services. Hence, fewer affluent tourists are more sustainable to the
destination and to local businesses, than masses of price sensitive consumers. They will
also result in lower detrimental effects to the natural environment as they would demand
less resources from destinations and their communities.
From a community-based perspective, limiting tourism figures can improve the
destinations’ sustainability, whilst limiting the impacts on the natural environment
(Saarinen, 2006:1129). Figure 2 illustrates a model that clarifies that mass tourism service
providers, such as foreign owned properties including international hotel chains are usually
associated with economic leakages (Garrigós et al., 2015). Whereas a sustainable tourism
product which is based on locally-owned, smaller businesses, are usually aligned to
economic linkages. Destinations can use CBT approaches to increase linkages by attracting
high yield, affluent tourists to locally-owned companies (Butler, 2020; Prasiasa, et al.,
2020). The tourism businesses ought to improve the quality of their services to appeal to
high-end segments.
Figure 2. The economic effects from different types of tourism services
To be successful, the proponents of CBT ought to ensure that they retain its specific
principles and characteristics. Thus, CBT practitioners could differentiate themselves from
other business models by offering authentic, local experiences to their guests. CBT can
establish itself as a niche tourism product that appeals to lucrative market segments.
Therefore, CBT service providers are expected to deliver on their promises. They have to
meet and exceed their customers’ expectations without lowering their standards of service.
CBT operators rely on their community’s local resources including
environment/natural resources, heritage, culture as well as on knowledgeable human
resources. Their employees should possess customer service skills, and ought to be trained
about their local tourism products. Local businesses may usually engage native employees
Community based tourism
Corporate tourism (and
high yield travel,
including MICE)
(comprising 4–5
star properties)
Small companies,
(including boutique
hotels, B&Bs, small
guest houses)
High-end segments
(Affluent customers)
High-end and low-end
segments (depending
on the type of property
and on demand factors,
including seasonality
(Affluent or price
sensitive customers)
Foreign ownership
Foreign management
Local ownership
Local management
Linkages Leakages
Local ownership
Local and/or foreign
Large and medium
sized companies
(comprising 2–4-star
Low-end segments
(Price-sensitive customers)
Mass tourism (and over
to improve their consumers’ experiences with their CBT product. However, there may be
instances where CBT operators may not find local employees in the labor market. In this
case, they have to train their imported employees about local cultures and traditions in
order to continue delivering authentic CBT experiences.
Figure 3 presents a model for sustainable CBT that relies on the destinations’
effective management of their carrying capacities. An ongoing evaluation of the
destinations’ infrastructures as well as on their human and natural resources, particularly
during their high season, is required to ensure that they do not exceed their specific carrying
capacities. While each specific context will have its own specific performance indicators,
this contribution suggests that destination marketers ought to consider the following issues:
The participation of local businesses and individual in CBT.
Local procurement of products (for accommodation establishments, hotels, restaurants,
and to other tourism businesses).
It is in the interest of CBT operators to think locally and act globally (Hofstede,
1998). They should consider sourcing their requirements from their local communities,
where possible. Hence, tourism planners could utilize local resources to reduce leakages
from their economy. Governments can encourage tourism businesses to support local
enterprises, for example, by purchasing local products, by supporting the local community
through CSR and environmentally responsible practices. They can raise awareness on
corporate responsible behaviors and on sustainable tourism initiatives. They may also
incentivize businesses through financial instruments to pursue laudable activities. They can
also provide support to tourism businesses, including small hotels and B&Bs to upgrade
their services to attract lucrative tourists in their communities. Of course, governments are
expected to maintain their destinations’ infrastructure and to offer suitable amenities to
their visitors.
These strategies are meant to foster an environment that promotes sustainable CBT
approaches that are intended to increase economic linkages, whilst improving societal and
the environmental outcomes in local communities. Figure 3 clarifies how tourism
businesses can optimize the utilization of local resources through sustainable CBT
strategies in order to improve their destination’s carrying capacity whilst reducing leakages
from their economy.
Figure 3. A sustainable model for community-based tourism
Conclusions and implications
The effectiveness of this proposed model for sustainable community-based tourism
relies on a regular evaluation of the marketing environment. Tourism practitioners are
Environmental protection
Monitoring and evaluation
Encouraging the
utilization of local
resources (human and
incentives (i.e. tax
breaks, reduction in
, etc.
Improving the carrying
capacity index
Reducing leakages and
increasing linkages (from
the local economy)
Creating value to
tourism businesses
Forging relationships
local suppliers
Engagement with local
Provision of education and
Reducing environmental
Favoring local ownership of
supplying good and services
expected to examine and re-examine their CBT strategies to ensure that they are still
creating value to their business, to the local community and to the environment at large.
Sustainable CBT approaches can support the local economic development of
destinations, however leakages can jeopardize the destinations’ competitiveness and
growth prospects. While the degree and types of leakages may vary, according to specific
characteristics of certain countries, it can be argued that the proper utilization of local
resources can improve the national economies and the quality of life of different
communities, including those from emerging economies.
The type of tourism planning and development that is adopted by certain
destinations is another factor that can have an effect on their economic leakages or linkages.
Based on the above, this contribution puts forward a theoretical model that is intended to
address the limitations of the carrying capacities of various destinations. In sum, it suggests
that sustainable CBT approaches that rely on the optimal utilization of local resources
(including human and natural) may result in economic growth as well as in positive
outcomes to local communities and their natural environments. This model is aimed at
rebalancing leakages with linkages in the economy, whilst responding to challenges
relating to the supply chains of different tourism businesses.
Indeed, there is scope for destinations to maximize the use of resources at their
disposal (both human and natural). In a similar vein, companies should avail themselves of
local resources, competences and capabilities. It is also in their interest to engage in
strategic CSR and sustainable tourism practices to support local stakeholders and to
safeguard their natural environment.
A sustainable CBT model would require tourism businesses to forging relationships
with different stakeholders including with the government and its policymakers, suppliers,
creditors, employees and customers, among others. The advancement of CBT would also
necessitate that destination marketers and hospitality businesses work together, in tandem
to improve their tourism product. Local stakeholders are expected to safeguard their natural
environment, culture and traditions for the benefit of their communities, and for their
valued tourists and visitors who would probably appreciate authentic destinations that offer
unique experiences to them.
Alzboun, N., Khawaldah, H., Backman, K. & Moore, D. (2016). The effect of sustainability
practices on financial leakage in the hotel industry in Jordan.
Journal of Hospitality
and Tourism Management
, 27, 18-26.
Arintoko, A., Ahmad, A.A., Gunawan, D.S. & Supadi, S. (2020). Community-based
tourism village development strategies: a case of Borobudur tourism village area,
GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites
, 29(2), 398–413.
Asker, S., Boronyak, L., Carrard, N., & Paddon M. (2010). Effective community based
tourism: a best practice manual. APEC Tourism Working Group. Griffith University:
Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre.
Baniya, R., Thapa, B. & Kim, M-S. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility among Travel
and Tour Operators in Nepal.
11(2771): 1-13.
Boluk, K. A., Cavaliere, C. T. & Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2019) A critical framework for
interrogating the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2030.
Agenda in
tourism, Journal of Sustainable Tourism,
27:7, 847-864.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: The Brundtland report. Retrieved April 10,
2009, from
Butler, R. W. (2020). Tourism carrying capacity research: a perspective article.
, 75(1), 207-211.
Caday-Fillone, M. O. & Villanueva, C. (2019). , "A Literature Review of Ecotourism
Carrying Capacity Measurements: Initial Findings" (2019). Travel and Tourism
Research Association: Advancing Tourism Research Globally. 12.
Camilleri, MA. (2014). Advancing the sustainable tourism agenda through strategic CSR
Tourism Planning & Development
, 2014, 11 (1), 42-56.
Camilleri, M. A. (2017). Corporate sustainability, social responsibility and environmental
Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing
. Cham,
Camilleri, M.A. (2018). The tourism industry: An overview.
Travel marketing, tourism
economics and the airline product
, 3-27. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
Camilleri, M. A. (2019). Measuring the corporate managers’ attitudes towards ISO’s
social responsibility standard.
Total Quality Management & Business
(13-14), 1549-1561.
Camilleri, M. A. (2020). Strategic corporate social responsibility in tourism and
Sustainable Development
, 28: 504–506.
Cater, E. (1995). Environmental Contradictions in Sustainable Tourism.
The Geographical
161(1), 21-28.
Chaudhary, M. & Lama, R. (2014). Community Based Tourism Development in Sikkim
of India A Study of Darap and Pastanga Villages.
Transnational Corporations
, 6(3), 228-237.
Cheer, J. M., Pratt, S., Tolkach, D., Bailey, A., Taumoepeau, S. & Movono, A. (2018).
Tourism in Pacific island countries: A status quo round
up. Asia Pac Policy Stud, 5:
Chilufya, A., Hughes, E. & Scheyvens, R. (2019) Tourists and community development:
corporate social responsibility or tourist social responsibility?, Journal of
Sustainable Tourism, 27:10, 1513-1529.
Chirenje, L. I., Chitotombe, J., Gukurume, S., Chazovachii, B. & Chitongo, L. (2013). The
Impact of Tourism Leakages on Local Economies: A Case Study of Nyanga District,
Zimbabwe. Journal of Human Ecology, 42(1): 9-16.
Coles, T., Fenclova, E. & Dinan, C. (2013). Tourism and corporate social responsibility:
A critical review and research agenda. Tourism Management Perspectives, 6: 122-
de Grosbois, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility reporting by the global hotel
industry: Commitment, initiatives and performance. International Journal of
Hospitality Management 31: 896-905.
Del Baldo, M. (2018). Sustainability and CSR orientation through “Edutainment” in
tourism. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(5): 1-14.
Dłużewska, A. M. (2018). Wellbeing versus sustainable development in tourism—The
perspective. Sustainable Development. p. 1-11, DOI: 10.1002/sd.1903
Dłużewska, A., & Giampiccoli, A. (2020). Enhancing island tourism's local benefits: A
proposed communitybased tourismoriented general model. Sustainable
Development. 1-12, DOI: 10.1002/sd.2141
Dodds, R. & Joppe. M. (2009). The Demand for, and Participation in Corporate Social
Responsibility and Sustainable Tourism – Implications for the Caribbean. ARA:
Journal of Tourism Research, 2(1):1-11.
Dodds, R. (2020) Using a Participatory Integrated Watershed Management Approach for
Tourism. Tourism Planning & Development, 17:1, 1-16.
Eshliki S. A. & Kaboudi, M. (2012). Community Perception of Tourism Impacts and Their
Participation in Tourism Planning: A Case Study of Ramsar, Iran. Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences 36 (2012) 333 – 341. ASEAN Conference on Environment-
Behaviour Studies, Savoy Homann Bidakara Bandung Hotel, Bandung, Indonesia,
15-17 June 2011.
Farmaki, A. (2019). Corporate social responsibility in hotels: a stakeholder approach.
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(6): 2297-2320.
Farrington, T., Curran, R., Gori, K., O’Gorman, K. D. & Queenan, C. J. (2017) "Corporate
social responsibility: reviewed, rated, revised", International Journal of
Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 29 Issue: 1, 30-47.
Garrigós Simón, FJ.; Galdón Salvador, JL.; Gil Pechuán, I. (2015). The economic
sustainability of tourism growth through leakage calculation. Tourism Economics.
21(4): 721-739.
Giampiccoli, A. & Saayman, M. (2018). Community-based tourism development model
and community participation. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure,
7(4), 1-27.
Giampiccoli, A. and Mtapuri, O. (2020). Introducing the Investment Redistributive
Incentive Model (IRIM): A new redistribution perspective in tourism investment and
beyond. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure 9(1/58): 1-16.
Hampton, M. P., Jeyacheya, J., & Long, P. H. (2018). Can tourism promote inclusive
growth? Supply chains, ownership and employment in Ha Long Bay, Vietnam. The
Journal of Development Studies, 54(2), 359-376.
Harris, L. C., & Pressey, A. (2021). Dirty work or working dirty? Deceiving cruise
tourists. Annals of Tourism Research, 88,
Hofstede, G. (1998). Think locally, act globally: Cultural constraints in personnel
management. In Management and international review (pp. 7-26). Gabler Verlag,
Idahosa, L. O. (2019). Understanding sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility and
responsible tourism in literature vs practice. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites,
26(3): 956-973.
Jugmohan, S., Spencer, J. P. & Steyn, J. N. (2016). Local natural and cultural heritage
assets and community based tourism: Challenges and opportunities. African Journal
for Physical and Health Sciences, 22(1-2), 306-317.
Karacaoğlu & Birdir, (2017). Success Factors of Community Based Tourism (CBT)
Perceived by Local Peoples: The Case of % 100 Misia Project. International Rural
Tourism and Development Journal, 1 (2): 53-61.
Kennell, J., (2016). Carrying capacity. In Encyclopedia of Tourism (pp. 133-135). Springer
International Publishing.
Lasso, A. & Dahles, H. (2018) Are tourism livelihoods sustainable? Tourism development
and economic transformation on Komodo Island, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of
Tourism Research, 23:5, 473-485.
Lee, T. H. & Jan, F-H. (2019). Can community-based tourism contribute to sustainable
development? Evidence from residents’ perceptions of the sustainability. Tourism
Management, 70, 368-380.
Lindström, K. N. (2020). Ambivalence in the evolution of a community-based tourism
sharing concept: a public governance approach. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality
and Tourism, 20(3), 302-315.
López-Guzmán, T., Borges, O. & Cerezo, J. M. (2011). Community-based tourism and
local socio-economic development: A case study in Cape Verde. African Journal of
Business Management, 5(5), 1608-1617.
Lund-Durlacher, D. (2015): Corporate Social Responsibility and Tourism. In: Education
for Sustainability in Tourism - A Handbook of Processes, Resources, and Strategies.
Moscardo, P. & Benckendorff, G. (eds.). Berlin: Springer, p. 59 – 73.
Manwa, H. & Manwa, F. (2014). Poverty Alleviation through Pro-Poor Tourism: The Role
of Botswana Forest Reserves. Sustainability, 6, 5697-5713
Marsiglio, S. (2017). On the carrying capacity and the optimal number of visitors in tourism
destinations. Tourism Economics, 23(3), 632-646.
Martini, N. K. A. (2020). Community participation in Blangsinga tourism village
development. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social
Sciences, 7(3), 91-97.
Martin-Rios, C. (2020). Sustainable Business Model: What Every Business Leader Should
Ask Themselves. HospitalityNet, 20 March 2020. Retrieved 26 September 2020 from
Mason, P. (2003). Tourism Impacts, Planning and Management. Oxford: Butterworth-
Massiani, J. & Santoro, G. (2012). The relevance of the concept of capacity for the
management of a tourist destination: theory and application to tourism management
in Venice. Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, LXVI (2), 142-156.
Mbaiwa, J. E. (2005). Enclave tourism and its socio-economic impacts in the Okavango
Delta, Botswana. Tourism Management, 26, 157-172.
Mearns, K. (2012). Community-based tourism and peace parks benefit local communities
through conservation in Southern Africa. Acta Academica, 44(2): 70-87.
Moral Moral, M., Fernández Alles, M. T. & Sánchez Franco, M. J. (2018). Attitudes of
rural accommodation managers towards the development of sustainable tourism.
Cuadernos de Turismo, 41: 707-711.
Mtapuri, O. & Giampiccoli, A. (2020). Toward a Model of Just Tourism: A Proposal.
Social Sciences, 9(34): 1-19.
Nel, E. & Binns, T. (2002). Place marketing, tourism promotion, and community-based
local economic development in post-apartheid South Africa. The Case of Still Bay—
The “Bay of Sleeping Beauty”. Urban Affairs Review, 38(2), 184-208.
Nel, E. (2001). Local Economic Development: A Review and Assessment of its Current
Status in South Africa. Urban Studies, 38(7), 1003–1024.
Ninaroon, P., Songkhla, R. N. & Pruksaarporn, S. (2020). Conceptual framework for the
antecedent and consequent of happiness in community-based tourism enterprise. The
2020 International Academic Multidisciplines Research Conference in Switzerland,
Okazaki, E. (2008) A Community-Based Tourism Model: Its Conception and Use, Journal
of Sustainable Tourism, 16:5, 511-529.
Pasko, G. (2016). Carrying Capacity Assessment - An Essential Tool for Sustainable
Tourism Development in Coastal Areas of Albania. European Journal of Economics
and Business Studies, 2(1): 164-171.
Prasiasa, D.P.O., Astawa, I.N.D., Widari, D.A.D.S. & Udiyana I.B.G., (2020). Analysis of
Community Based Tourism Implementation for Sustainability of Tourism Village in
Bali Province. Journal of Tallent Development and Excellence. 12 (1), 152-163.
Pratt, S., Suntikul, W., & Dorji, U. (2018). Economic sustainability? Examining the
linkages and leakages between agriculture and hotels in Bhutan. International
Journal of Tourism Research, 20(5), 626-636.
Randle, M., Kemperman, A. & Dolnicar, S. (2019). Making cause-related corporate social
responsibility (CSR) count in holiday accommodation choice. Tourism Management,
75: 66-77.
Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Tijmstra, S. (2010). On the emergence and significance of local
economic development strategies. CAF Working Papers, N° 2009/07. Caracas; CAF.
Saarinen, J. (2006). Traditions of sustainability in tourism studies. Annals of Tourism
Research, 33(4): 1121-1140.
Saayman, M. & Giampiccoli, A. (2016). Community-based and pro-poor tourism: Initial
assessment of their relation to community development. European Journal of
Tourism Research, 12:145-190.
Sabokkhiz, M., Sabokkhiz, F., Shayesteh, K., Malaz, J. & Shieh, E. (2016). Sustainable
Tourism Management by Using Recreational Carrying Capacity Concept (Case:
Mesr Desert in Iran). Review of European Studies, 8(4): 105-112.
Sánchez-Cañizares, S. M., Castillo-Canalejo, A. M. & Cabeza-Ramírez, L. J. (2018).
Sustainable Tourism in Sensitive Areas: Bibliometric Characterisation and Content
Analysis of Specialised Literature. Sustainability, 10, 1525, 1-19.
Scheyvens, R. (2007). Exploring the Tourism-Poverty Nexus. In M. Hall (Ed.), Pro-poor
tourism: who benefits? Perspective on tourism and poverty reduction (pp.121-144).
Clevedon: Channel View Publications.
Smith, R. A. & Ong, J. L. T. (2015) Corporate Social Responsibility and the
Operationalization Challenge for Global Tourism Organizations, Asia Pacific
Journal of Tourism Research, 20:5, 487-499.
Spinrad, B. K., Seward, S. B. & Bélisle, F. J. (1982). Introduction. In Seward, S. B. &
Spinrad, B. K. (Eds.), Tourism in the Caribbean: The Economic Impact, pp. 7-22.
Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
Strydom, A. J., Mangope, D. & Henama, U. S. (2017). Economic sustainability guidelines
for a Community-Based Tourism Project: The Case of Thabo Mofutsanyane, Free
State Province. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 6(3), 1-17.
Tasci, A, Semrad, K. & Yilmaz, S. (2013). Community based tourism finding the
equilibrium in COMCEC context: Setting the Pathway for the Future. Ankara:
COMCEC Coordination Office.
Terzioglu, M. & Gokovali, U. (2016). Economic linkages and leakages in the hotel
industry: The first empirical evidence from Turkey. Tourism Economics, 22(4) 715–
Thomas, A., Moore, A. & Edwards, M. (2018). Feeding island dreams: exploring the
relationship between food security and agritourism in the Caribbean. Island Studies
Journal, 13(2), 145-162.
Tien, N. H., Anh, D. B. H., & Ngoc, N. M. (2020). Corporate financial performance due to
sustainable development in Vietnam. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 27(2), 694-705.
Trong Tuan, L. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Tourism. Business
and Economic Research, 1(1- E4):1-9.
UNCSD NGO steering committee, (1999). Tourism and sustainable development.
Sustainable tourism: a non-governmental organization perspective. Background
paper # 4. New York: United Nation.
UNWTO (2002). Tourism and Poverty Alleviation. Madrid: UNWTO.
Wijaya, P. Y., Hartati, P. S. & Sumadi, N. K. (2020). The Readiness of Community Based
Tourism Village Development (Case Study at Bongkasa Pertiwi Tourism Village,
Bali Province, Indonesia). European Journal of Business and Management
Research, 5(3), 1-5.
Wiranatha, A. S., Antara, M. & Suryawardani, I. G. A. O. (2017). Impact of Tourism
Leakage on the Growth of Economic sectors, Employment and Income Distribution
in Bali, Indonesia. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(8), 1-17.
WTO, (1983). Risks of Saturation of Tourist Carrying Capacity Overload in Holiday
Destinations. Madrid: WTO.
Yim, S., Bae, Y. H., Lim, H., & Kwon, J. (2019). The role of marketing capability in linking
CSR to corporate financial performance: When CSR gives positive signals to
stakeholders. European Journal of Marketing, 53(7), 1333-1354.
... Through the negotiation processes of GPN actors, including local institutions and the state, resources captured at the local level should ideally be transferred into investments for regional development (Murphy and Schindler, 2011). This conceptualisation has two major downsides: firstly, it condenses a variety of institutions as rules of the game, both formal and informal, on multiple spatial scales (Smith, 2015). ...
... Yet, tourism is embedded into the wider regional economy. Existing studies on linkages between tourism and agriculture in rural areas show that supply linkages can benefit both sectors and increase revenues (Mtapuri et al., 2021;Pillay and Rogerson, 2013;Rogerson and Rogerson, 2014). Utilising local resources, and thus integrating local suppliers into the tourism sector, can generate economic growth and secure livelihoods, as highlighted by Mtapuri et al. (2021). ...
... Existing studies on linkages between tourism and agriculture in rural areas show that supply linkages can benefit both sectors and increase revenues (Mtapuri et al., 2021;Pillay and Rogerson, 2013;Rogerson and Rogerson, 2014). Utilising local resources, and thus integrating local suppliers into the tourism sector, can generate economic growth and secure livelihoods, as highlighted by Mtapuri et al. (2021). However, exclusionary effects are possible, especially for poor farmers, from these supply channels (Pillay and Rogerson, 2013). ...
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted global production networks and challenged the resilience of regional economies to external shocks. The tourism sector was severely affected by the travel bans imposed, as were regions characterised by tourism development, such as Zambezi in northern Namibia. Nonetheless, with the support of the national government, conservancies, as local governance institutions, partly maintained the distribution of value from tourism throughout the pandemic and strengthened agriculture-tourism linkages to achieve long-term transformation. These findings suggest that local institutions are able to create regional resilience through their capacity to drive adaptation and adaptability in a diversified regional economy.
... s' engagement with stakeholders, their ethical responsibility, responsible human resources management and environmental sustainability practices were leading to strategic outcomes for their business and to society at large.The second article is entitled, 'Advancing community-based tourism approaches for the sustainable development of destinations.'Mtapuri et al. (2021) suggest that community-based tourism (CBT) can create commercial and social value to local businesses as well as to residents whilst addressing issues relating to the carrying capacities of destinations. They argue that tourism destinations may experience 'economic leakages' from their gross tourism earnings as they may have to allocate ...
... nt. Visitors utilize the destinations' infrastructures, including transportation facilities and utilities like water and electricity. They also consume resources and generate waste. The authors posit that both tourists as well as the tourism and hospitality service providers have a responsibility to bear to minimize their impact on the environment.Mtapuri et al. (2021) raise awareness on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and on sustainable behaviours that are intended to add value to society, to the local economy and to their companies' bottom lines. Hence, the researchers put forward a theoretical model that clarifies how responsible CBT strategies can address issues relating to the carrying capa ...
Full-text available
The contributions that were published in this special issue suggest that there is more to CSR than publicity stunts and cause-related marketing. They imply that there is scope for tourism and hospitality businesses to look after their employees, to build stronger relationships with suppliers, with local communities where they operate their business, as well as with regulatory stakeholders. This way, they will be in a better position to prove their license to operate and to improve their legitimacy in society, whilst doing well, in economic terms. This discourse is very relevant today, now more than ever before, in the context of a resilient tourism industry that is slowly but surely emerging from an unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic situation.
... Tourism has long been acknowledged as one of the world's significant pillars for emerging nations [107]. Although the tourism industry is known for its broad scope, sports tourism is now rapidly growing in popularity in the sector [108]. ...
Full-text available
Globally, sports tourism is considered a vital type of tourism that combines sports and tourism to attract tourists, contribute to the economy, and promote local culture. Despite its straightforward relevance, the current literature finds some drawbacks of the social exchange theory (SET) in modeling local support in tourism development, particularly when dealing with emotional interactions among tourists and locals. Thus, this study integrates the emotional solidarity construct (i.e., welcoming nature, sympathetic understanding, and emotional closeness), residents’ attitudes, and the extension of SET (i.e., support for sports tourism, community contribution, and future support for sports tourism development) to model the residents’ support for future sports tourism development, with personality traits as a moderating variable between emotional solidarity and attitude. This study uses random sampling to obtain the response from 1004 residents in Danao City (Philippines)—an emerging destination for sporting events. Furthermore, partial least squares—structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) is utilized to examine the direct relationships among the exogenous and endogenous constructs and the moderating effect of personality traits (i.e., Big Five personality traits). The results revealed that all direct relationships were supported, indicating that those emotional interactions among tourists and residents would affect the latter’s view on their support for sports tourism which would consequently translate to support for future development agenda. However, the moderating effect of the personality traits was not supported. Furthermore, a multigroup analysis was conducted to gain more profound implications on the varying attitudes of the residents towards sports tourism. Based on the study’s findings, insights were drawn for governments to design specific measures for developing sports tourism in view of local support.
... Community-based tourism (CBT) implementations seek to improve living conditions and economic status of local communities as well as to avoid gradually disappearing in their identities and irreversibly damaging their environments [1,3]. The multiple-faceted and ambitious attributes of CBT intrinsically identify it as pertinent in providing a systematic solution to tourism-led local development, such as tourism planning to support overall socio-economic development, community empowerment and ownership in decision making, communal collaboration in managing and developing tourism assets, conservation of natural resources and cultural heritages, and quality visitor experiences by advocating host-guest interactions [1,[3][4][5]. Therefore, in many developing countries [6], CBT plays a crucial role in supporting land use reforms with special respect to rural revitalization and local sustainable development [1,2]. ...
Full-text available
Community-based tourism (CBT) has been adopted as an effective and practical solution to land use policies by governments that simultaneously pursue upgrading of local economy, conservation of local ecosystem and development of local communities. Confronting with new normality of detrimental eventualities in situated environments, destination management organizations (DMOs) or local governments have to employ effective governance strategies for fostering tourism community resilience in order to sustain development of CBT destinations. In viewing of that facilitating development through evaluation usually manifests as an efficient strategy in governance practices, this paper contributes to fill two main gaps in tackling comprehensive evaluation of tourism community resilience. Firstly, by noticing the fact that current literature overlooks processual characteristics of tourism community resilience, which originate from integration of disaster management and destination management (DM2), we have developed an analytical framework comprised of six attributes for comprehensively evaluating tourism community resilience. Secondly, aiming at the phenomena that cognitive assessments on attributes of tourism community resilience often exhibit complicate uncertainties caused by low-structured or ill-structured problem nature, we have put forward a powerful expression tool of probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy uncertain unbalanced linguistic set (PDHF_UUBLS) to simultaneously capture evaluators’ cognitive characteristics of decision hesitancy, bipolar epistemic notions and relative importance among assessments. Then by formalizing comprehensive evaluation of tourism community resilience as a multiple attributes decision making process, we construct an effective multiple attributes group decision making (MAGDM) approach with assessments in the form of PDHF_UUBLS. Theoretical analyses verify the effectiveness of our constructed MAGDM approach and also show the approach avoids potential information distortion in comparison with other approaches. Overall, this paper provides effective and pertinent solutions, with both analytical framework and methodology, to the urgent task of comprehensive evaluation of tourism community resilience in DM2 agenda, thereby is of apparent significance in governance practice of CBT.
... From a global perspective, it is suggested that decision makers should pay attention to improve the relationship between tourism performance and tourism competitiveness (Bazargani and Kilic 2021). Mtapuri et al. (2021) believe that destination managers and tourism enterprises have the opportunity to adopt sustainable tourism practices, and use of local resources in a strategic manner, in order to maximize the increase in its economic relations, ultimately for the growth of tourism opportunities, and could improve the competitiveness of the destination, while protecting the environment and its carrying capacity. Bertolini et al. (2021) further discusses strategy making in an organizational realm marked by power relations and how their consequences affect society as a whole. ...
Full-text available
As the competition of tourism industry becomes increasingly white-hot, the sustainability and competitiveness of tourism economies inside a zone gradually gets people’s attentions. Based on data of 16 cities from 2010 to 2019, this paper aims to investigate the sustainability and competitiveness of tourism economies in the Chengdu-Chongqing metropolitan area, by constructing a niche evaluation index and four niche models (niche ecostate-ecorole model, niche expansion model, niche breadth model, and niche overlap degree model). The results show that (1) during the sample period, the niche values of tourism competitiveness in most cities of the Chengdu-Chongqing metropolitan area have shown a sustained increasing trend, indicating that the status of these cities in resources, market, environment, social economy, and other dimensions is rising steadily, and their competitive advantages are gradually increasing; (2) the niche values of tourism competitiveness in the core cities of Chengdu-Chongqing metropolitan area (Chengdu and Chongqing) remain stable, while the niche values of tourism competitiveness in the remaining cities vary greatly; the comprehensive niche values of tourism industry competitiveness of the cities in the central area are significantly lower than those of the cities in the peripheral area; (3) the niche overlap of tourism competitiveness in the Chengdu-Chongqing metropolitan area is relatedly high, indicating that the homogenization of tourism in these cities is more serious.
... It is the responsibility of the organization to back a percentage of their revenues, amenities, and employee efforts to humanitarian programs such as education, community assistance, and the safe drinking water and air; these benevolent commitments improve the society's class and aid in environmental protection. New research has found a strong and bene cial link between CSR and community performance in terms of societal and eco-friendly e ciency (Mtapuri et al., 2021). Corporate donations and philanthropy, according to existing literature, tend to improve a company's image in society and effectiveness. ...
Full-text available
Green innovation hasn't gotten much attention as a factor of environmental policies in developing countries like Pakistan. Green innovation and long-term financial performance are very much dependent yet; despite the fact that many studies have looked into the influence of various corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on environmental sustainability, few have looked into the implications of green innovation strategies and sustainability. From January to December 2021, data were collected from the respondent of 184 listed companies of 12 sectors of Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). The results were estimated by using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). According to the findings of the study, all aspects of CSR were determined to be favorably significant in promoting environmentally sustainable growth except one aspect of CSR to consumers. Furthermore the mediation effect of green innovation is also aided by environmentally sustainable development.
... Stakeholders demand that they clearly explain what, why, when and how decisions were made during the reporting period. Apart from the publication of annual corporate statements, the reporting businesses and organizations are expected to communicate with stakeholders through regular media releases, to keep them up to date with the latest developments (Göransson & Fagerholm, 2018;Morsing, 2006;Mtapuri, Camilleri & Dłużewska, 2021). Moreover, today's stakeholders would also appreciate honest and timely communications through social media, especially during crises like COVID-19 (Camilleri, 2021b). ...
Full-text available
Large organizations, including listed businesses, financial service providers as well as public services entities are increasingly disclosing information on their environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues through corporate websites or via social media. Therefore, this research uses valid measures from the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) to explore the individuals' attitudes toward online corporate social responsibility (CSR) communications. The data was gathered from a structured questionnaire among three hundred ninety-two respondents (n=392). A structural equations modeling partial least squares (SEM-PLS 3) approach was used to analyze the data. The findings revealed that the timeliness, relevance and accuracy of information as well as the source expertise were highly significant antecedents that were affecting the research participants' attitudes toward CSR communications. This contribution implies that there is scope for content curators to publish quality online information on their business activities to improve their trustworthiness and positive credentials among stakeholders.
... ISO 14001 can used to increase the legitimacy of practitioners in societyThe adoption of environmental management practices can improve corporate reputation and may enhance the practitioners' transparency credentials with stakeholders(Da Fonseca, 2015;Oliveira et al., 2016;Su, et al., 2015). Firms can manage their legitimacy by conveying (material) information regarding operational improvements in their processes and by clearly demonstrating their ongoing commitment to the environment(Camilleri, 2021b;Mtapuri, Camilleri & Dłużewska, 2021;Santos et al., 2016). ...
Full-text available
This contribution presents the findings from a two-stage systematic review. It relied on PRISMA’s methodical protocol to capture and analyze high-impact articles, that were fo-cused on the International Standards Organization’s ISO 14001 - Environment Management Systems. Whilst stage 1 shed light on the most cited publications since 1995, stage 2 nar-rowed down the search results between 2015 and 2021. The findings suggest that the use of this certifiable standard may result in operational efficiencies through better utilization of resources and waste management systems. It provides opportunities for practitioners to re-conceive their license to operate and to enhance their credentials with stakeholders. It considered potential pitfalls like high certification costs, time constraints as well as an in-crease in paperwork and red tape. Moreover, it recognizes that managers and employees may not be willing to implement changes as they may prefer the status quo or could not be knowledgeable enough to integrate the standard’s environment management systems with existing practices.
The excessive speed of development for tourism seriously restricts the sustainable development of ecological conservation areas (ECAs). In this study, we take Beijing's ecological conservation area (BECA) as the study area, and construct the model of the green development level of tourism (GDLT) in ECAs to measure and analyze the spatial-temporal evolution and factors influencing of GDLT in BECA. Our results demonstrate that the GDLT in BECA continued to rise from 2011 to 2017, but the spatial distribution was unbalanced. The main factors influencing GDLT in BECA have been the endowment level of green tourism resources and the construction level of the regional ecological civilization. The new method to measure GDLT in ECAs presented here can provide reference for the green development of tourism in ECAs. The findings can construct the theory of the green development of tourism in ECAs, and enrich the theory of tourism geography and tourism ecology from the perspective of the green development concept. K E Y W O R D S ecological civilization construction, ecological conservation areas, ecological environment, ecological security, green development, high-quality development, sustainable development, tourism
Full-text available
Purpose: This contribution appraises previous theoretical underpinnings that are focused on family businesses in tourism and hospitality. It discusses about the opportunities and challenges for their development. Method: A systematic literature review was carried out through peer reviewed publications that were indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. It relied on the PRISMA protocol to evaluate rigorous articles and reviews. A content analysis sheds light on high impact contributions on “family business” and “tourism” or “hospitality”, that were published since 2010. Findings: This bibliographic research captured, analyzed and synthesized the findings from previous contributions to identify the factors that are facilitating the growth prospects, long term sustainability and innovative approaches of family businesses within the tourism and hospitality industry. Originality: Currently, there are just a few contributions that advance relevant knowledge and understanding on the business development of family firms in tourism and hospitality. This research addresses this academic gap as these entities constitute the life blood of tourist destinations in various contexts.
Full-text available
Limited attention has been given to the underlying prerequisites for how the tourism industry can develop a well-informed, holistic and strategic governance that would lead to more robust sustainable tourism governance. By introducing a theoretical approach stressing a deeper and more contextual understanding of tourism development in the face of a growing interest in the sharing economy, the study engenders insights into the complexity of one public tourism organisation's creativity and ambivalence when approaching alternative tourism strategies. The aim is to undertake an in-depth investigation into the evolution of one tourism sharing economy concept initiated and implemented by a public tourism organisation in Sweden, focusing especially on the factors driving and hampering change from traditional tourism growth to a sharing business logic. Concluding remarks revolve around the complex environment in which the public tourism organisation manoeuvres. On the one hand, the study considers the lock-in of the vertical tourism-centric discourse and, on the other hand, the potential of breaking free from the traditional business model through co-creational capacity building in the regional context.
Full-text available
Village tourism for the benefit of the community in the development of tourism, so that people with culture are not only for tourism purposes, but are able to improve welfare and preservation. The purpose of this research is to study the readiness of the Bongkasa Pertiwi Tourism Village as a tourism village based on Community Based Tourism. There are several aspect to analyze the readiness of tourism village, i.e.: (1) Socio-economic aspects, (2) Socio-cultural aspects, (3) Environmental aspects (4) management aspects. Based on the results of an assessment of the readiness of developing the Bongkasa Pertiwi Tourism Village, the level of community-based tourism development readiness is quite potential. Some aspects that are decisive in the readiness to develop Community Based Tourism are social and environmental aspects with sufficient potential, while the socio-economic and management aspects have potential that is not yet optimal.
Full-text available
Although more and more companies seem to be acting on sustainability, the results are scant. How can business leaders pave the way to sustainable business models?
Full-text available
Tourism businesses engage in strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR) when they integrate responsible behaviours in their operational practices (Camilleri, 2015, 2019a; Carroll & Shabana, 2010; Porter & Kramer, 2006, 2011; Van Marrewijk, 2003; Vogel, 2005). Strategic CSR activities may usually improve their bottom line, whilst taking into account their legitimate stakeholders' interests (Garay & Font, 2012; Kang, Lee, & Huh, 2010). For instance, various hotels and restaurants are increasingly communicating about their business activities that are having an effect on their stakeholders, including their employees, patrons, guests, suppliers, local communities, the environment, regulatory authorities and the community at large. Their non-financial reports (CSR reports, sustainability reports, or integrated reports) can identify the operational practices that are satisfying their stakeholders' expectations (Inoue & Lee, 2011; Lantos, 2001). The hospitality businesses' strategic CSR behaviours can improve their employees' working conditions, as they provide: decent employment to locals and migrant workers, health and safety in their workplace environments, adequate compensation and recognition of all employees, ongoing training and development opportunities, work-life balance, and the like (Camilleri, 2016). Moreover, they may address the environmental issues by: offering local, fresh, and sustainable food to their patrons; engaging in circular economy behaviours, reducing food waste; decreasing energy consumption, reducing the carbon footprint, and greenhouse emissions; using ecoresponsible products, et cetera (Camilleri, 2019a, 2019b). Various hotel chains are stepping in their commitment for sustainability issues as they set their own policies to implement strategic CSR practices (Falck & Heblich, 2007; Garay & Font, 2012). Very often, they rely on the nongovernmental organisations' regulatory instruments and tools like the Global Reporting Initiative's process and performance-oriented standards, or they align their practices with the Integrated Reporting framework (Camilleri, 2018). Many companies are increasingly recognising that there is a business case for CSR (Carroll & Shabana, 2010; Porter & Kramer, 2006). Their motivation behind their engagement in strategic CSR practices is to increase their profits and to create value to society (Camilleri, 2017; Lantos, 2001). However, the extant academic literature has yielded different findings on the relationships between the corporate social performance and their financial performance (Bird, Hall, Momentè, & Reggiani, 2007; Inoue & Lee, 2011; Kang et al., 2010; Kim & Pennington-Gray, 2017; Lee, Kim, & Ham, 2018; Orlitzky, Schmidt, & Rynes, 2003; Wang, 2014; Youn, Hua, & Lee, 2015). Relevant research has shown that companies did well by doing good (Falck & Heblich, 2007; Porter & Kramer, 2011). The businesses' laudable activities can help them build a positive brand image and reputation (Rhou, Singal, & Koh, 2016). Hence, there is scope for the hospitality businesses to communicate their CSR behaviours to their stakeholders. Their financial performance relies on the stakeholders' awareness of their social and environmental responsibility (Camilleri, 2016). Currently, there are still a few contributions, albeit a few exceptions, that have focused on strategic CSR practices within the hospitality industry. Therefore, this special issue will include but is not limited to the following topics: • Destination branding through sustainability marketing; • Ethical issues in hospitality; • Global issues, climate change, and the environmental awareness of hospitality businesses; • Mobilities and sustainable tourism destinations; • Policies and regulatory instruments on sustainable and responsible tourism; • Responsible procurement practices within the hospitality industry; • Stakeholder engagement within the hospitality industry; • Strategic practices in agri-/eco- tourism; • Strategic practices for sustainable tourism; • Sustainability marketing; • Sustainability and mass destinations; • Sustainable and responsible tourism destinations; • The business case for responsible and sustainable tourism; • The circular economy and the hospitality industry; • The communication of responsible and sustainable tourism practices; • The consumer awareness of responsible and sustainable tourism products; • The corporate citizenship and sustainable practices of hospitality businesses; • The environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures of hospitality businesses; • The marketing of sustainable destinations; • The planning and organisation of CSR activities of hospitality businesses; • The promotion of socially/environmentally responsible practices of hospitality businesses; • The promotion of the eco-tourism and sustainable practices; • The provision of education and training on responsible and sustainable tourism practices; • The responsible corporate governance of hospitality businesses; • The responsible supply chain of hotels and restaurants; • The sustainability of niche tourism markets; • The use of eco labels by hospitality businesses; • The use of technologies to promote responsible and sustainable practices.
Full-text available
Inequality is growing within and between countries. Tourism is a growing sector affecting lives, with a vibrancy of its own and malleable structures that can benefit a majority, if social justice and equality are the goals. Cooperatives are one of these structures, and have the potential to drive a development trajectory that delivers a just tourism. We define just tourism as a form of tourism that delivers the most benefits to its members-for themselves and by themselves-representing a form of accumulation from within. This article is based on secondary data and is a conceptual paper. It posits a coop hotel model, which harnesses the hope of spreading the cooperative model for its finer qualities of providing job security to workers, happiness, democratic participation, decision making functions, self-governance, empowerment, openness, retention of capital within the community, the pursuit of both economic social goals, resilience, and importantly, the emphasis on community contribution and matters of sustainability. Community-based tourism and cooperatives have interlocking values such as local control, local/self-management, and being steeped in the local context. The coop hotels model, which is the main contribution of this article, suggests the creation of mother hotel coops, with coop sisters and coop children in pursuit of social justice for a just tourism.
Evidence suggests that some cruise ship employees engage in work that aligns to the poor working conditions, servile roles, or stigmatized positions of ‘dirty workers’. Accordingly, we adopt Routine Activity Theory from criminology to generate insights into research into employee misbehavior, the interactions of tourists and service workers, and the dirty work of cruise ship personnel. We begin with a review of contemporary research into crime, deception, and tourism before outlining existing insights into cruise ship work. After outlining our research approach, we present the result of a study into the convergence of likely offenders, potential targets, and opportunities to deceive passengers in the context of cruise ships. We conclude with a series of implications of theory and practice.
This article proposes a general community‐based tourism (CBT)‐oriented framework that could be used as a guideline by policymakers dealing with tourism development in small islands. It investigates fundamental issues related to tourism and advances possible solutions utilizing a specific form of alternative tourism within a sustainable tourism context that considers the well‐being of the local population, especially the disadvantaged sector of society. As such, the article captures recurrent critical issues relating to tourism and proposes a model that represents various elements to consider when drafting policies. It emphasizes ecotourism that has long been considered the most sustainable form of tourism. Some of the findings and characteristics of the model could be useful for remote destinations in general.