No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Les méthodes mixtes : vers une méthodologie 3.0 ?
... My approach can be described as mixed methods: " the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods in the same research" (Aguilera and Chevalier 2021a;Bergman 2008). In this sense, it is rather commonplace in the social sciences, "because they [the mixed methods] have in fact been at the heart of social science practice from the outset, [...] i.e. mobilising a diversity of methods to consolidate an explanation and strengthen the results" (Aguilera and Chevalier 2021a). ...
... My approach can be described as mixed methods: " the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods in the same research" (Aguilera and Chevalier 2021a;Bergman 2008). In this sense, it is rather commonplace in the social sciences, "because they [the mixed methods] have in fact been at the heart of social science practice from the outset, [...] i.e. mobilising a diversity of methods to consolidate an explanation and strengthen the results" (Aguilera and Chevalier 2021a). Despite this apparent banality, there is still very little mixed-methodological literature, as the authors point out (Aguilera and Chevalier 2021a). ...
... In this sense, it is rather commonplace in the social sciences, "because they [the mixed methods] have in fact been at the heart of social science practice from the outset, [...] i.e. mobilising a diversity of methods to consolidate an explanation and strengthen the results" (Aguilera and Chevalier 2021a). Despite this apparent banality, there is still very little mixed-methodological literature, as the authors point out (Aguilera and Chevalier 2021a). In environment studies, the combination is slightly different, in that the quantitative methods, for example, are not the same as those used in social sciences (sedimentological analyses versus questionnaire-based surveys (see Winata and McLafferty, Chapter 43)). ...
Despite ongoing debates about its origins, the Anthropocene—a new epoch characterized by significant human impact on the Earth's geology and ecosystems—is widely acknowledged. Our environment is increasingly a product of interacting biophysical and social forces, shaped by climate change, colonial legacies, gender norms, hydrological processes, and more. Understanding these intricate interactions requires a mixed-methods approach that combines qualitative and quantitative, biophysical and social research.
However, mixed-methods environmental research remains rare, hindered by academic boundaries, limited training, and the challenges of interdisciplinary collaboration. Time, funding, and the integration of diverse data further complicate this research, whilst the dynamics and ethics of interdisciplinary teams add another layer of complexity.
Despite these challenges, mixed-methods research offers a more robust and ultimately transformative understanding of environmental questions. This Field Guide aims to inspire and equip researchers to undertake such studies. Organized like a recipe book, it assists researchers in the preparation of their field work, as well as offering entry points to key methods and providing examples of successful mixed-methods projects.
This book will be of interest to scholars wishing to tackle environmental research in a more holistic manner, spanning ‘sister’ disciplines such as anthropology, statistics, political science, public health, archaeology, geography, history, ecology, and Earth science.
... Alors que les dimensions professionnelle et sociale de l'insertion sont régulièrement envisagées ensemble, elles demeurent bien distinctes (Kieffer & Tanguy, 2001). Ainsi, nous considérons l'insertion professionnelle comme l'accès à un emploi ou à une formation, et l'insertion sociale au travers de cinq dimensions : l'acquisition d'un logement (Dorvil et al., 2002), la pratique de loisirs (Moro & Ragi, 2003), la santé (Chauffaut et al., 2004), la mobilité (Weber, 2010) et le réseau (Berthaud, 2017 (Aguilera & Chevalier, 2021). Ainsi, une première enquête longitudinale qualitative a porté sur les bénéficiaires de la GJ. ...
L’évaluation du dispositif Garantie jeunes a donné lieu à trois principaux rapports (Farvaque et al., 2016 ; Loison-Leruste et al., 2016 ; Gaini et al., 2018). Dans le cadre de cette thèse, nous cherchons à savoir si ce dispositif a un effet sur l’insertion professionnelle et sociale de ses bénéficiaires, qui transite par l’acquisition de compétences non académiques. A partir d’une méthode d’enquête mixte, nous nous sommes à la fois intéressés aux jeunes et aux recruteurs susceptibles de les embaucher. D’un côté, notre approche longitudinale qualitative repose sur cinquante-cinq entretiens semi-directifs menés en trois temps avec les bénéficiaires du dispositif. D’un autre, notre approche quantitative, qui s’appuie sur la méthode des vignettes, est fondée sur un échantillon de cent-soixante-quatorze recruteurs. Premièrement, nos résultats principaux montrent que la GJ a un effet direct sur l’insertion professionnelle et sociale mais également sur les compétences non académiques, même si celui-ci reste à nuancer. Par ailleurs, l’effet indirect sur l’insertion, qui transite par les soft skills, ne concerne pas l’ensemble de nos enquêtés. Ainsi, il est avéré chez les jeunes qui ont perçu le dispositif comme un tremplin, mais également ceux pour qui la GJ n’a pas permis de changer leur situation initiale. Deuxièmement, nous remarquons que les recruteurs considèrent les soft skills comme importantes et que le dispositif GJ agit positivement au moment du recrutement pour ses bénéficiaires.
Drawing on a survey conducted in France between 2019 and 2023, which used a mixture of quantitative and qualitative methods, this article seeks to examine the practice of yoga through the prism of the quest for excitement by focusing on emotional dimensions. Results show that practitioners who are strongly committed to yoga and belong to the privileged classes or the upper strata of the middle classes engage in a practice focused on self-control/emotional renewal with the aim of reaching spiritual dimensions that are themselves a source of intense emotions.
Cet article explore les relations entre les mobilités résidentielles intrarégionales et l’émigration des Corses et des Metartiniquais vers le continent français. Alors que l’émigration internationale est parfois précédée d’une migration au sein du territoire national [King et al., 1997 ; Wong, 2000 ; Bakewell et Jónsson, 2011] cette étude se concentre sur l’articulation de ces deux formes de mobilité dans des contextes insulaires. À partir des données du recensement de la population de 2019 et de 55 entretiens semi-directifs menés entre 2023 et 2024, tant sur les îles concernées que sur le continent, l’analyse montre que, bien que les barrières à l’émigration soient plus élevées depuis la Martinique que depuis la Corse, la Martinique figure parmi les régions les plus touchées par l’émigration, tandis que la Corse est peu concernée. Paradoxalement, ces deux régions ont en commun de présenter un faible taux de mobilité résidentielle locale. Ce phénomène s’explique par des facteurs géographiques, comme la taille restreinte du territoire, et par une structure socio-économique caractérisée par une population plus âgée et plus pauvre que la moyenne nationale. Si ces constats peuvent laisser penser à une absence de lien entre mobilité interne et émigration en Martinique et en Corse, l’article met en évidence des relations complexes entre ces deux formes de déplacement. Ces interactions peuvent être de nature substitutive, catalysatrice, alternante ou encore préliminaire. Les dynamiques ainsi dévoilées soulignent la complexité des trajectoires de mobilité dans ces contextes insulaires, offrant une perspective nuancée sur la manière dont les individus naviguent entre mobilité locale et émigration.
Contraintes spatiales, conditions politiques/géopolitiques complexes, caractère limité des autorisations de terrain sont des freins à la collecte de données dans les marges désertiques égyptiennes. La littérature grise constitue une source alternative. Afin d’analyser sa portée, l’article s’intéresse aux projets agricoles de l’Ouest du Delta du Nil et mobilise les documents de trois institutions internationales : la Banque mondiale, le FIDA, l’USAID. Le premier objectif est méthodologique, questionnant la portée de ces ressources en sciences sociales. Le second objectif est de montrer comment et pourquoi ces institutions ont investi les terres arides.
Local resources in a context of health restrictions: a study of students in a working-class suburb of Paris
The health restrictions resulting from the COVID-19 crisis were particularly strict in France and had a significant impact on the socialisation of university students. This article is based on fieldwork conducted in a working-class suburb of Paris in the context of the health crisis and the limitations of social interactions to the immediate environment, looking at the role of local resources for students (in terms of immediate social ties and the urban space). Although these resources are shown to be a form of protection against the isolation resulting from increased distancing of university socialisation, they are nevertheless unevenly distributed and limited in terms of gender. They may even be in contradiction with university socialisation for those who have limited legitimate cultural resources and may thus contribute to accentuating inequalities.
Envisager le numérique dans une perspective spatiale permet d’ouvrir les trois dimensions de la bibliothèque physique à une multiplicité d’autres dimensions qui permettraient des sauts d’un « rayonnage » à un autre, autant que leur incessante reconfiguration. Dans quelle mesure peut-on filer cette métaphore et transposer par analogie les cheminements intellectuels de la bibliothèque dite physique à son avatar numérique ? Prenant pour étude de cas la plateforme Gallica, cette enquête pose donc la question de savoir si l’on peut reconsidérer un usage du numérique, et des bibliothèques numériques en particulier, comme l’arpentage d’un espace, et selon quelles modalités.
This paper describes the Data Domotopia a 2300 + respondent self-administered web-based survey. It includes 100 + multi-purpose items about home-making and stillness in a moving world. We suppose that home-making can reveal coping strategies and resilience practices to make everyday life work – as home is a central location in people’s activity-travel patterns. To describe this phenomenon, the concept of Domotopia is introduced, defining how people arrange, use, and experience their homes to cope with the pathologies of accelerated and liquid modernity (Bauman 2005). While the Data Domotopia is based on a mixed-method combining qualitative and quantitative material, this paper focuses mainly on the description of the questionnaire – which is organized into three interrelated layers: the dwelling, the dwellers, and the neighborhood. Each of these layers unfolds in functional, social, emotional and sensory components. The survey covers most of the contemporary issues related to home-making. This includes the domestic space and gender issues; the socio-spatial resources (mobility, action space, core, and wider social network); lifestyles, ideals, and residential aspiration; time pressures, time use, organization and stress; equipment, rules and arrangements; interpersonal relations, cohabitation and negotiation, dominance and power. Intakes on the Data Domotopia is given by two concrete cases about the time-space coverage of the habitual action space, and about inter-personal task allocation. These examples show the potential of the data to study domocentric stillness and resilience to urban pathologies. The data – aggregated to the infra-communal level – is available for research purposes.
This first special issue on the Yellow Vests movement (YVM) published in English has three objectives. First, we advocate that this puzzling movement proved to be an insightful research field for scholars to make a plea for mixed methods. By so doing, we bridge the usual gaps between positivist and constructivist approaches. Second, after four years of research, this publication is also a first milestone to provide empirical data and analysis of the movement, to better understand its evolution, significance and effects on French society. By combining case studies and national-based comparison, regional face-to-face surveys, national online surveys and in-person surveys, the nine articles provide a clearer and more precise picture of the movement’s composition and its evolution over the months. In addition to a detailed description of the social and political components of the movement, several articles propose to establish bridges between the values and opinions of the Gilets Jaunes or Yellow Vests, the cultural practices of the social groups from which they come, and the modalities of mobilization and form of politicization, inscribed in space and in time. In this way, they provide the debate with valuable keys to understanding the dynamics of the movement. Third, this special issue consequently further analyses how the YVM challenges contemporary social movements studies, the understanding of uprisings and assumptions about contentious politics. The first article introduces the major analytical issues and mixed-method approaches of the 9 articles and their contributions as whole to scholarship on the study of the YVM and social movements in France and from a comparative perspective.
This article reviews recent attempts to develop multi-method social scientific frameworks. The article starts by discussing the ontological and epistemological foundations underlying case studies and variance-based approaches, differentiating approaches into bottom-up, case-based and top-down, variance-based approaches. Case-based approaches aim to learn how a causal process works within a case, whereas variance-based approaches assess mean causal effects across a set of cases. However, because of the different fundamental assumptions, it is very difficult for in-depth studies of individual cases to communicate meaningfully with claims about mean causal effects across a large set of cases. The conclusions discuss the broader challenges this distinction has for the study of comparative politics more broadly.
Manuel mettant en évidence les méthodes et méthodologies propres à la science politique, avec des conseils pratiques pour mener à bien un travail de recherche.
Une initiation à la recherche en science politique à travers :
- des conseils pratiques pour mener à bien un travail de recherche
- une présentation pédagogique des méthodes de collecte et d’analyse des données
- des exemples concrets extraits de la littérature récente
- des tableaux de synthèse, des mises en situation et des définitions des termes clés
Pour apprendre à :
- élaborer une stratégie de recherche
- choisir et collecter les données pertinentes
- analyser et interpréter les résultats
- identifier les forces et les faiblesses de chaque méthode
Skills and Inequality studies the political economy of education and training reforms from the perspective of comparative welfare state research. Highlighting the striking similarities between established worlds of welfare capitalism and educational regimes, Marius R. Busemeyer argues that both have similar political origins in the postwar period. He identifies partisan politics and different varieties of capitalism as crucial factors shaping choices about the institutional design of post-secondary education. The political and institutional survival of vocational education and training as an alternative to academic higher education is then found to play an important role in the later development of skill regimes. Busemeyer also studies the effects of educational institutions on social inequality and patterns of public opinion on the welfare state and education. Adopting a multi-method approach, this book combines historical case studies of Sweden, Germany, and the United Kingdom with quantitative analyses of macro-level aggregate data and micro-level survey data.
This article contributes to ongoing debates about the direction of comparative politics through an analysis of new data on the scope, objectives, and methods of research in the field. The results of the analysis are as follows. Comparative politics is a rich and diverse field that cannot be accurately characterized on the basis of just one dimension or even summarized in simple terms. In turn, the tendency to frame choices about the direction of the field in terms of a stark alternative between an old area studies approach and a new economic approach relies on largely unsupported assumptions. It is therefore advisable to focus on problematic methodological practices that, as this study shows, are widespread in comparative research and thus pose serious impediments to the production of knowledge.
Qualitative methods are currently undergoing a renaissance in political science, with a rich new literature developing and disseminating them and greatly increased attention to preparing scholars in their use. Although this is a discipline-wide phenomenon, at the same time political science continues to be differentiated along subfield lines. The collection of articles in this symposium describes the trajectory of qualitative methods in three of political science’s empirical subfields: comparative politics, international relations (IR), and American politics. Although much of the new literature and training is self-consciously transdisciplinary, the subfields continue to exert a strong influence. These essays investigate the three empirical subfields to uncover some of the areas in which they have made more progress and therefore have particular strengths to share, to provide some examples of applications of qualitative methods outside of readers’ own subfields, and to help make sure that future methodological opportunities offered by discipline-wide developments are not limited by subfield lacunas.
This article reviews the key role that case study methods have played in the study of international relations (IR) in the United States. Case studies in the IR subfield are not the unconnected, atheoretical, and idiographic studies that their critics decry. IR case studies follow an increasingly standardized and rigorous set of prescriptions and have, together with statistical and formal work, contributed to cumulatively improving understandings of world politics. The article discusses and reviews examples of case selection criteria (including least likely, least and most similar, and deviant cases); conceptual innovation; typo-logical theories, explanatory typologies, qualitative comparative analysis, and fuzzy-set analysis; process tracing; and the integration of multiple methods.
The purpose of this article is to examine how the field of mixed methods currently is being defined. The authors asked many of the current leaders in mixed methods research how they define mixed methods research. The authors provide the leaders' definitions and discuss the content found as they searched for the criteria of demarcation. The authors provide a current answer to the question, What is mixed methods research? They also briefly summarize the recent history of mixed methods and list several issues that need additional work as the field continues to advance. They argue that mixed methods research is one of the three major “research paradigms” (quantitative research, qualitative research, and mixed methods research). The authors hope this article will contribute to the ongoing dialogue about how mixed methods research is defined and conceptualized by its practitioners.
Despite repeated calls for the use of “mixed methods” in comparative analysis, political scientists have few systematic guides for carrying out such work. This paper details a unified approach which joins intensive case-study analysis with statistical analysis. Not only are the advantages of each approach combined, but also there is a synergistic value to the nested research design: for example, statistical analyses can guide case selection for in-depth research, provide direction for more focused case studies and comparisons, and be used to provide additional tests of hypotheses generated from small-N research. Small-N analyses can be used to assess the plausibility of observed statistical relationships between variables, to generate theoretical insights from outlier and other cases, and to develop better measurement strategies. This integrated strategy improves the prospects of making valid causal inferences in cross-national and other forms of comparative research by drawing on the distinct strengths of two important approaches.
When studying individuals, when is the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods better than just one method alone?
Whereas the debate in macro-level research, such as in political science about comparing nations, has made progress in identifying
meaningful logics for a combination of methods, it is yet unclear how these logics can be applied to the study of individuals.
Individual-level dynamics are in tendency less inert than those of nations or organisations. Therefore, a combination of methods
is more difficult to justify in individual-level analysis since differences in measurement results could be due to changes
in the dynamics rather than due to the application of different techniques. In contrast, the assumption of unit homogeneity
seems to be more easily met for individuals than for countries or other higher-level aggregates, facilitating a comparison
of like and like. First, this article presents a compilation of conditions scattered across the literature for the analysis
of individuals, according to which a mixed-method is preferable to a single-method approach. Second, the application of these
conditions is illustrated with an analysis of the impact of intergenerational relationships on welfare state attitudes in
Germany on the basis of survey and focus group data.
KeywordsMixed methods–Multi-method approach–Welfare state attitudes–Individuals
Both data-set observations (DSOs) and causal-process observations (CPOs) are important for causal inference. DSOs – located in the standard “rectangular data set” of statistical analysis – make their contribution through a quantitative logic of comparison, frequently using different forms and extensions of regression analysis. They are deservedly a major research tool in political science. Yet when based on observational data, they must be analyzed with great care. Problems such as cofounders, for example, can be hard to address. DSOs are therefore valuable, but serious limitations must be recognized. CPOs provide a different form of analytic leverage. They are carefully selected “nuggets of data” that are a foundation of qualitative research and can have great probative value in evaluating hypotheses. Achieving rigorous inference with CPOs depends on exact specification both of the inferences to be evaluated, and of standards of evaluation. If such specification is inadequate, CPOs likewise have serious limitations. A more powerful option – which can help address limitations on both sides – is to use DSOs and CPOs together in a single study. As our examples show, major studies have indeed adopted this multi-method approach, thereby achieving strong inferential leverage.
In recent years the predilection for Systems/OR practice to be underpinned by a single methodology has been called into question, and reports on multimethodology projects are now filtering through into the literature. This paper takes a closer look at multimethodology. It outlines a number of different possibilities for combining methodologies, and considers why such a development might be desirable for more effective practice, in particular by focusing upon how it can deal more effectively with the richness of the real world and better assist through the various intervention stages. The paper outlines some of the philosophical, cultural and cognitive feasibility issues that multimethodology raises. It then describes a framework that can attend to the relative strengths of different methodologies and provide a basis for constructing multimethodology designs. Finally it presents a systematic way of decomposing methodologies to identify detachable elements, and the paper concludes by outlining aspects of an agenda for further research that emerges out of the discussion.
Reflecting the rising popularity of research that combines qualitative and quantitative social science, Multi-Method Social Science provides the first systematic guide to designing multi-method research. It argues that methods can be productively combined using the framework of integrative multi-method research, with one method used to carry out a final causal inference, and methods from other traditions used to test the key assumptions involved in that causal inference. In making this argument, Jason Seawright considers a wide range of statistical tools including regression, matching, and natural experiments. The book also discusses qualitative tools including process tracing, the use of causal process observations, and comparative case study research. Along the way, the text develops over a dozen multi-method designs to test key assumptions about social science causation.
In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, modern states began to provide many of the public services we now take for granted. Inward Conquest presents the first comprehensive analysis of the political origins of modern public services during this period. Ansell and Lindvall show how struggles among political parties and religious groups shaped the structure of diverse yet crucially important public services, including policing, schooling, and public health. Liberals, Catholics, conservatives, socialists, and fascists all fought bitterly over both the provision and political control of public services, with profound consequences for contemporary political developments. Integrating data on the historical development of public order, education, and public health with novel measures on the ideological orientation of governments, the authors provide a wealth of new evidence on a missing link in the history of the modern state.
Le process tracing, comme notion et ensemble de méthodes d’analyse, a connu ces dernières années un indéniable succès dans le champ des sciences sociales. En témoignent les 1 360 000 entrées que propose le moteur de recherche Google Scholar à la seule indication du concept associé au champ social science. (Premières lignes)
Retraçant un parcours de recherche commencé au CEVIPOF il y a plus de 40 ans, cet article est un plaidoyer pour l’éclectisme méthodologique. A partir d’exemples tirés de ses travaux sur le comportement électoral, le racisme et les inégalités sociales, l’auteure montre le caractère artificiel de l’opposition entre approches qualitatives et quantitatives, tant au niveau du recueil des données que de leur analyse. Entretiens et sondages, questions ouvertes et fermées, observation participante et expérimentations, chacune de ces techniques éclaire une facette du phénomène étudié. Il faut donc les croiser pour le saisir dans sa totalité.
Nous nous proposons, dans cet article, de formuler certaines remarques sur l'utilisation de l'entretien non directif comme méthode d'analyse des phénomènes sociaux, et non pas d'exposer les techniques d'entretien non directif d'enquête (1), non plus que de proposer une technique originale d'analyse de ces entretiens (2). Ces remarques sont issues à la fois de l'enseignement de ces méthodes et de leur utilisation, que nous pratiquons depuis plus d'une dizaine d'années, en collaboration avec Monique et (1) Cet article reprend un exposé que nous avons fait dans le cadre des Journées de la Société française de psychologie (octobre 1972) où la Section de psychologie sociale avait proposé comme thème : " l'analyse d'entretiens non directifs dans le domaine politique ". Eric Landowski y exposait également l'approche sémiologique de ce type d'entretiens (...).
Higher education policy has been subject to considerable reform in OECD states over the past two decades. Some states have introduced tuition fees, others have massively increased public funding for higher education, and still others remain in stasis, retaining the elitist model with which they began the postwar era. This article develops the argument that higher education policy in the OECD is driven by a set of partisan choices within a trilemma between the level of enrollment, the degree of subsidization, and the overall public cost of higher education. The author develops a formal model of the micromechanisms underlying movements within this trilemma, noting the importance of partisan politics, existing enrollment, tax structure, and access. These propositions are tested statistically on a sample of twenty-two OECD countries and through case histories of higher education reform in England, Sweden, and Germany.
The field of social movement studies has expanded dramatically over the past three decades. But as it has done so, its focus has become increasingly narrow and 'movement-centric'. When combined with the tendency to select successful struggles for study, the conceptual and methodological conventions of the field conduce to a decidedly Ptolemaic view of social movements: one that exaggerates the frequency and causal significance of movements as a form of politics. This book reports the results of a comparative study, not of movements, but of communities earmarked for environmentally risky energy projects. In stark contrast to the central thrust of the social movement literature, the authors find that the overall level of emergent opposition to the projects has been very low, and they seek to explain that variation and the impact, if any, it had on the ultimate fate of the proposed projects.
In recent years evaluators of educational and social programs have expanded their methodological repertoire with designs that include the use of both qualitative and quantitative methods. Such practice, however, needs to be grounded in a theory that can meaningfully guide the design and implementation of mixed-method evaluations. In this study, a mixed-method conceptual framework was developed from the theoretical literature and then refined through an analysis of 57 empirical mixed-method evaluations. Five purposes for mixed-method evaluations are identified in this conceptual framework: triangulation, complementarity, development, initiation, and expansion. For each of the five purposes, a recommended design is also presented in terms of seven relevant design characteristics. These design elements encompass issues about methods, the phenomena under investigation, paradigmatic framework, and criteria for implementation. In the empirical review, common misuse of the term triangulation was apparent in evaluations that stated such a purpose but did not employ an appropriate design. In addition, relatively few evaluations in this review integrated the different method types at the level of data analysis. Strategies for integrated data analysis are among the issues identified as priorities for further mixed-method work.
How can scholars select cases from a large universe for in-depth case study analysis? Random sampling is not typically a viable approach when the total number of cases to be selected is small. Hence attention to purposive modes of sampling is needed. Yet, while the existing qualitative literature on case selection offers a wide range of suggestions for case selection, most techniques discussed require in-depth familiarity of each case. Seven case selection procedures are considered, each of which facilitates a different strategy for within-case analysis. The case selection procedures considered focus on typical, diverse, extreme, deviant, influential, most similar, and most different cases. For each case selection procedure, quantitative approaches are discussed that meet the goals of the approach, while still requiring information that can reasonably be gathered for a large number of cases.
- James Mahoney
- Kkv After
James Mahoney, « After KKV : The New Methodology of Qualitative Research », World Politics, 62 (1), 2010,
p. 120-147.
« Introduction to the Second Edition : A Sea Change in Political Methodology
- Henry Brady
- David Collier
- Jason Seawright
Henry Brady, David Collier, Jason Seawright, « Introduction to the Second Edition : A Sea Change in Political
Methodology », dans H. Brady, D. Collier (dir.), Rethinking Social Inquiry..., op. cit., p. 7.
- James Mahoney
- Gary Goertz
James Mahoney, Gary Goertz, « A Tale of Two Cultures : Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research »,
Political Analysis, 14 (3), 2006, p. 227-249, ici p. 229.
La science politique et ses méthodes
- Y Surel
Y. Surel, La science politique et ses méthodes, op. cit.
- L'expression Vient De Vijayendra Rao
- W Dans John
- Creswell
L'expression vient de Vijayendra Rao, cité dans John W. Creswell, Abbas Tashakkori, « Mixed Methodology
Across Disciplines », Journal of Mixed-Methods Research, 2 (1), 2008, p. 3.
Creswell réédité plusieurs fois chez Sage
- W De John
À titre d'exemple, le manuel de référence de John W. Creswell réédité plusieurs fois chez Sage (dernière
édition en 2017), Research Design. Qualitative, quantitative and Mixed-Methods Approaches, a été cité
136 569 fois.
Pour une synthèse des usages, diffusion et appropriations de la QCA, voir Axel Marx, Benoit Rihoux, Charles C. Ragin, « The Origins, Development and Application of QCA. Analysis : The First 25 Years
Pour une synthèse des usages, diffusion et appropriations de la QCA, voir Axel Marx, Benoit Rihoux, Charles
C. Ragin, « The Origins, Development and Application of QCA. Analysis : The First 25 Years », European Political
Science Review, 6 (1), 2014, p. 115-142.
Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies
- Gary Goertz
- Multimethod Research
Gary Goertz, Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies. An Integrated Approach, Princeton,
Princeton University Press, 2017.
la « recherche multi-méthode » est définie comme celle « combinant des techniques de collecte et de traitement de données provenant de deux ou plusieurs traditions méthodologiques
- Jason Seawright
Jason Seawright, Multi-Method Social Science. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016, p. 2 : la « recherche multi-méthode » est définie comme celle « combinant des
techniques de collecte et de traitement de données provenant de deux ou plusieurs traditions méthodologiques »
(traduction des auteurs).
cette logique ne recoupe pas exactement la logique de « concurrent nested strategy » de John W. Creswell consistant en une analyse concomitante quanti-quali où l'un et l'autre se complètent mais l'un ou l'autre domine l'analyse
- On
On notera que si le terme est le même, cette logique ne recoupe pas exactement la logique de « concurrent
nested strategy » de John W. Creswell consistant en une analyse concomitante quanti-quali où l'un et l'autre
se complètent mais l'un ou l'autre domine l'analyse (voir J. W. Creswell, Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, op. cit., p. 218). On notera aussi que E. S. Lieberman ne cite pas John
W. Creswell, omission symptomatique d'un cloisonnement disciplinaire important.
- Macartan Humphreys
- Alan M Jacobs
Macartan Humphreys, Alan M. Jacobs « Mixing Methods : A Bayesian Approach », American Political Science
Review, 109 (4), 2015, p. 653-673.
Il est symptomatique de noter que ce livre -très remarqué et discuté aux États-Unis -a donné lieu à un symposium dans une revue européenne
- G Goertz
- Multimethod . Research
G. Goertz, Multimethod Research..., op. cit. Il est symptomatique de noter que ce livre -très remarqué et discuté
aux États-Unis -a donné lieu à un symposium dans une revue européenne (European Political Science Review,
18, 2019, p. 157-169) mais dans lequel uniquement des Nord-Américains en débattent.
- Mario Luis Small
Mario Luis Small, « How to Conduct a Mixed Methods Study : Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature »,
Annual Review of Sociology, 2011, 37 (1), p. 57-86.
- Todd D Jick
Todd D. Jick, « Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods : Triangulation in Action », Administrative Science
Quarterly, 24 (4), 1979, p. 610.
- Donald T Campbell
- D W Fiske
Donald T. Campbell, D. W. Fiske, « Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod
Matrix », Psychological Bulletin, 56, 1959, p. 81-105.
- Amel Ahmed
- Rudra Shil
Amel Ahmed, Rudra Shil, « When Multi-Method Research Subverts Methodological Pluralism : Or, Why We Still
Need Single-Method Research », Perspectives on Politics, 10 (4), 2012, p. 935-953.
Social Protest and Policy Change. Ecology, Antinuclear, and Peace Movements in Comparative Perspective
- Marco Giugni
Marco Giugni, Social Protest and Policy Change. Ecology, Antinuclear, and Peace Movements in Comparative
Perspective, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
« Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research », art. cité
- E S Lieberman
E. S. Lieberman, « Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research », art. cité.
- Joshua D Kertzer
- Brian C Rathbun
Joshua D. Kertzer, Brian C. Rathbun, « Fair is Fair : Social Preferences and Reciprocity in International Politics », World Politics, 67 (4), 2015, p. 613-655.
Anne Clerval, Paris sans le peuple. La gentrification à Paris
- Par
Par exemple, dans la sociologie urbaine française : Anne Clerval, Paris sans le peuple. La gentrification à Paris,
Paris, La Découverte, 2010 ; Thomas Aguilera, « Reloger, mettre en attente et expulser les bidonvilles de Madrid :
quand des politiques de résorption produisent de l'expulsion », L'année sociologique, 68 (1), 2018, p. 101-134.
- John W Cresswell
John W. Cresswell, « Editorial : Mapping the Field of Mixed Methods Research », Journal of Mixed Methods
Research, 3 (2), 2009, p. 95-108, ici p. 106.
Ignorance and Surprise
- Matthias Gross
Matthias Gross, Ignorance and Surprise. Science, Society and Ecological Design, Cambridge, MIT Press, 2010.