Article

Use of continuous passive motion device after arthroscopic hip surgery decreases post-operative pain: A randomized controlled trial

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Background We sought to determine whether continuous passive motion (CPM) usage improves outcomes following arthroscopic hip surgery involving acetabular labral repair. Our hypothesis is that CPM usage reduces pain and pain medication use and improves quality of life in individuals who undergo hip arthroscopy. Methods We created a randomized controlled trial consisting of 54 patients who underwent arthroscopic acetabular labral repair. Patients were randomized to two groups, one with CPM use post-operatively and one without. Primary outcomes measured were pain level, patient satisfaction, and quality of life. Parameters used to measure these outcomes were self-reported pain scores on Likert scale, frequency of analgesic medication use, and self-reported scores on Hip Outcome Score Activity of Daily Living (HOS ADL). These parameters were compared between the two randomized groups using t-test for statistical analysis. Results There was no statistical difference between the treatment and control groups in terms of patient characteristics. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of HOS ADL scores, although the patients in the control group demonstrated a trend toward higher HOS ADL scores. The patients in the CPM group had a statistically significant decrease in pain levels after surgery compared to patients in the control group. The total morphine equivalent dose consumed in the first two post-operative weeks was higher in the control group compared to the CPM group, although this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions Use of CPM resulted in lower pain level scores in patients after hip arthroscopy. Although there is no statistical difference in quality of life or quantity of analgesics consumed post-operatively, patients who used CPM tended to have lower HOS ADL scores (which is desirable) and less consumption of pain medication. A study with a larger sample of patients might elucidate more differences between the two groups. Level of Evidence II, therapeutic.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... Continuous passive motion was at first suggested in postoperative recovery after wound or joint operation, since an animal experiment demonstrated that it counteracted the pathologic phases of joint stiffness [49]. However, recent studies did not reveal the efficacy of CPM in enhancing body function [50], which was a similar result as the RCTs, and it led to conflicting results. We found very low-certainty evidence that CPM showed better pain reduction and quality of life. ...
Article
To reduce pain after total hip replacement (THR), researchers are interested in drug-free interventions. However, there is still a lack of consensus on their prevention efficacy. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the use of nonpharmaceutical interventions for postoperative pain management after THR. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PEDRO, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for articles published between and 1991 and 2020. The main outcome measures were postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and quality of life (QoL). In total, 1,942 patients were studied. We found moderate evidence indicating postoperative pain relief measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index Scale, with mean differences (MDs) of -0.28 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.49 to -0.07; P=0.01; I2 =0%) within three months, -0.19 (95% CI, -0.40 to 0.02; P=0.07; I2 =0%) between 3-6 months, and -0.13 (95% CI, -0.35 to 0.08; P=0.21; I2 =0%) between 6-12 months. Additionally, we found that acupuncture therapy could reduce opioid analgesic consumption (MD, -0.98; 95% CI, -1.18 to -0.79; fentanyl [mg/h]; P<0.01; I2 =72.2%) and significantly improve pain relief with an MD of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.47 to 1.33; P<0.01; I2 =0%) measured using the visual analog scale. Electrotherapy slightly improved perceived pain with an MD of 0.22 (95% CI, -0.27 to 0.70; P=0.37; I2 =0%). Moreover, moderate evidence has shown that preoperative exercises improve QoL. This meta-analysis suggested that continuous passive motion did not improve pain or QoL. Postoperative exercise was associated with pain relief and improved QoL. Acupuncture therapy after THR has been shown to reduce opioid analgesic consumption.
Article
Background Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a well-recognized cause of hip pain in adults. The hip-spine relationship between the femur, pelvis, and lumbosacral spine has garnered recent attention in hip arthroplasty. However, the hip-spine relationship has not been well described in patients with FAI. Questions/purposes The goal of this study was to determine whether lumbopelvic mobility is altered after hip arthroscopy. Does lumbopelvic motion, defined as the difference between standing and sitting measurements for sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic-femoral angle (PFA), change after hip arthroscopy for FAI? Methods Between June 2019 and March 2020, one surgeon performed 43 arthroscopic hip labral repair surgeries for FAI in active-duty military servicemembers. The diagnosis of FAI was made clinically and with standing AP pelvis, Dunn lateral, and false-profile radiographs. All patients underwent advanced imaging, including 3T MRI to identify labral tears and three-dimensional CT to characterize bony morphology. The musculoskeletal radiologist measured alpha angle, lateral center-edge angle, anterior center-edge angle, neck-shaft angle, femoral version, and acetabular version at 1200, 1300, 1400, and 1500 using CT. Patients also underwent a diagnostic fluoroscopic-guided injection with local anesthetic and corticosteroids; > 50% pain relief was considered a positive response to injection. During the study period, the operative surgeon did not perform any open procedures for FAI; all surgical treatment was performed arthroscopically. Preoperative sitting and standing radiographs were obtained from all patients. Ninety-five percent (41 of 43) of the cohort underwent adequate postoperative sitting and standing radiographs obtained 2 months after surgery, which were used for analysis in this retrospective study. The cohort was 71% male (29 of 41) and 29% female (12 of 41), with a mean age of 33 years. Within this military population undergoing primary hip arthroscopy, 30 were enlisted servicemembers and 11 were officers. SS, PT, and PFA were measured by four observers on sitting and standing lateral pelvic radiographs. Interclass correlation statistics indicated high reliability for SS, PT, and seated PFA (κ range 0.75 to 1.00) compared with lower reliability for standing PFA measurements (κ range 0.59 to 0.65). The delta between standing and sitting SS, PT, and PFA was compared perioperatively. Student t-test analysis was used for comparisons (p < 0.05). Results Lumbosacral motion in the sitting position changed after hip arthroscopy. Measurements of the standing lumbopelvic mobility did not change with hip arthroscopy: ΔSS = 1.8° (p = 0.13), ΔPT = -0.56° (p = 0.50), ΔPFA = 0.54° (p = 0.50). However, measurements of sitting lumbopelvic mobility did change with hip arthroscopy. SS diminished (Δ = -4.3°; p = 0.008), PT increased (Δ = +3.9°; p = 0.03), and PFA increased (Δ = +4.3°; p = 0.03) when patients were seated. These data may indicate that in the sitting position, less motion occurs at the spine and more motion occurs at the hip after hip arthroscopy. Conclusion This radiographic study suggested that lumbopelvic mobility in the seated position is affected by hip arthroscopy for FAI. The clinical significance of this observation remains unknown but warrants further investigation. Future studies should seek to determine whether changes in lumbopelvic mobility after hip arthroscopy have clinically relevant effects, either positive or negative. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose To determine the rate of reporting for sociodemographic variables in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating femoral acetabular impingement (FAI) and hip arthroscopy. Methods PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were queried for articles relating to FAI and hip arthroscopy. Articles included in final analysis were RCTs investigating operative management of FAI. Included RCTs were analyzed for reporting of age and sex or gender as well as the following sociodemographic variables: race, ethnicity, insurance status, income, housing status, work status, and education level in the results section or any section of the paper. Data was analyzed using χ² and Fisher exact tests with significance defined as P < .05. Results Forty-eight RCTs were identified from 2011 to 2023. Age was reported in 48 of 48 (100%) of included papers; sex or gender was reported in 47 of 48 (97.9%). Reporting of sociodemographic variables in any section respectively was: race (7/48, 14.6%), ethnicity (4/48, 8.33%), insurance status (0/48, 0%), income (1/48, 2.08%), housing status (0/48, 0%), work status (3/48, 6.25%), and education (2/48, 4.17%). There was no significant difference for reporting demographic variables with respect to journal or year of publication (P = .666 and P = .761, respectively). Sociodemographic variables (9/48) were reported significantly less frequently than age and sex or gender (48/48) (P < .001). Conclusions This study found that sociodemographic variables in FAI and hip arthroscopy RCTs are reported with much lower frequency than age and sex or gender. These findings may demonstrate the need to include patient sociodemographic data in RCTs so that their results can be better generalized and applied to the appropriate patient population. Level of Evidence Level II, systematic review of level I and II evidence.
Article
Full-text available
The early post-operative course after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome has not been thoroughly characterized or correlated to factors that may influence recovery. The aim of this study was to report on early pain, function and attitudes towards rehabilitation and to determine predictors of early recovery after hip arthroscopy. Sixty-two patients reported pre-operative pain, iHOT-12 (hip functional score), psychological status and other baseline characteristics. Pain, iHOT-12, hip flexion and several other outcomes were measured through 6 weeks post-operative. Baseline characteristics were correlated with outcomes using univariate and multivariable models. Pain relief started on post-operative day 1 and consistently improved throughout the 6 weeks of follow-up. The average patient’s pain was reduced from a pre-operative level of 5/10 to 2/10 by 6 weeks post-operative. Similarly, iHOT-12 improved from 33/100 to 57/100 whereas hip flexion increased by 9° by 6 weeks post-operative. At 2 weeks post-operative, pre-operative anti-inflammatory usage was associated with greater improvement in pain and swelling; pre-operative opioid usage with poorer patient-reported helpfulness of and adherence to rehabilitation; and higher ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score and lower procedure time with improvement of the pre-operative pain complaint. At 6 weeks, greater depression was associated with lower post-operative pain reduction but greater pre-operative pain complaint improvement. Continuous passive motion usage was associated with increased hip flexion. Pain improved from pre-operative by Day 1 after hip arthroscopy, and early functional improvements were seen by 6 weeks post-operative. Pre-operative anti-inflammatory and opioid usage, depression, race, ASA score, procedure time and continuous passive motion usage were significantly associated with study outcomes.
Article
Full-text available
The objectives of this study are to survey the weight-bearing limitation practices and delay for returning to running and impact sports of high volume hip arthroscopy orthopedic surgeons. The study was designed in the form of expert survey questionnaire. Evidence-based data are scares regarding hip arthroscopy post-operative weight-bearing protocols. An international cross-sectional anonymous Internet survey of 26 high-volume hip arthroscopy specialized surgeons was conducted to report their weight-bearing limitations and rehabilitation protocols after various arthroscopic hip procedures. The International Society of Hip Arthroscopy invited this study. The results were examined in the context of supporting literature to inform the studies suggestions. Four surgeons always allow immediate weight bearing and five never offer immediate weight bearing. Seventeen surgeons provide weight bearing depending on the procedures performed: 17 surgeons allowed immediate weight bearing after labral resection, 10 after labral repair and 8 after labral reconstruction. Sixteen surgeons allow immediate weight bearing after psoas tenotomy. Twenty-one respondents restrict weight bearing after microfracture procedures for 3–8 weeks post-operatively. Return to running and impact sports were shorter for labral procedures and bony procedures and longer for cartilaginous and capsular procedures. Marked variability exists in the post-operative weight-bearing practices of hip arthroscopy surgeons. This study suggests that most surgeons allow immediate weight bearing as tolerated after labral resection, acetabular osteoplasty, chondroplasty and psoas tenotomy. For cartilage defect procedures, 6 weeks or more non-weight bearing is suggested depending on the area of the defect and lateral central edge angle. Delayed return to sports activities is suggested after microfracture procedures. The level of evidence was Level V expert opinions.
Article
Full-text available
Unlabelled: Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral-chondral dysfunction has evolved rapidly over the past 15 years. There have been multiple commentaries published on rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy without any published standardized objective criteria to address the advancement of the athlete through the phases of rehabilitation. The purpose of this clinical commentary is to describe a criteria driven algorithm for safe integration and return to sport rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy. The criteria based program allows for individuality of the athlete while providing guidance from early post-operative phases through late return to sport phases of rehabilitation. Emphasis is placed on the minimum criteria to advance including healing restraints, patient reported outcomes, range of motion, core and hip stability, postural control, symmetry with functional tasks and gait, strength, power, endurance, agility, and sport-specific tasks. Evidence to support the criteria will be offered as available. Despite limitations, this clinical commentary will offer a guideline for safe return to sport for the athlete while identifying areas for further investigation. Level of evidence: 5.
Article
Full-text available
Over the past two decades, as the prevalence of chronic pain and health care costs have exploded, an opioid epidemic with adverse consequences has escalated. Efforts to increase opioid use and a campaign touting the alleged undertreatment of pain continue to be significant factors in the escalation. Many arguments in favor of opioids are based solely on traditions, expert opinion, practical experience and uncontrolled anecdotal observations. Over the past 20 years, the liberalization of laws governing the prescribing of opioids for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain by the state medical boards has led to dramatic increases in opioid use. This has evolved into the present stage, with the introduction of new pain management standards by the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) in 2000, an increased awareness of the right to pain relief, the support of various organizations supporting the use of opioids in large doses, and finally, aggressive marketing by the pharmaceutical industry. These positions are based on unsound science and blatant misinformation, and accompanied by the dangerous assumptions that opioids are highly effective and safe, and devoid of adverse events when prescribed by physicians. Results of the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) showed that an estimated 22.6 million, or 8.9% of Americans, aged 12 or older, were current or past month illicit drug users, The survey showed that just behind the 7 million people who had used marijuana, 5.1 million had used pain relievers. It has also been shown that only one in 6 or 17.3% of users of non-therapeutic opioids indicated that they received the drugs through a prescription from one doctor. The escalating use of therapeutic opioids shows hydrocodone topping all prescriptions with 136.7 million prescriptions in 2011, with all narcotic analgesics exceeding 238 million prescriptions. It has also been illustrated that opioid analgesics are now responsible for more deaths than the number of deaths from both suicide and motor vehicle crashes, or deaths from cocaine and heroin combined. A significant relationship exists between sales of opioid pain relievers and deaths. The majority of deaths (60%) occur in patients when they are given prescriptions based on prescribing guidelines by medical boards, with 20% of deaths in low dose opioid therapy of 100 mg of morphine equivalent dose or less per day and 40% in those receiving morphine of over 100 mg per day. In comparison, 40% of deaths occur in individuals abusing the drugs obtained through multiple prescriptions, doctor shopping, and drug diversion. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to describe various aspects of crisis of opioid use in the United States. The obstacles that must be surmounted are primarily inappropriate prescribing patterns, which are largely based on a lack of knowledge, perceived safety, and inaccurate belief of undertreatment of pain.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To systematically review the evidence on the effect of continuous passive motion, combined with usual physiotherapy management, on increasing shoulder joint range of motion and muscle strength, and reducing shoulder pain in adults following rotator cuff repair, compared with standard physiotherapy. Data sources: A comprehensive search in available bibliographic electronic databases was undertaken to locate eligible studies. Reference tracing was also used to locate studies. Review methods: Randomized controlled trials reporting on the effect of continuous passive motion on increasing shoulder joint range of motion and muscle strength and reducing shoulder pain in adults following rotator cuff repair were included in the review. The PEDro scale was used to determine the methodological quality of the studies. Data were summarized in a narrative form because of their heterogeneity. Results: Four randomized controlled trials were eligible for this review. One Japanese article was excluded as the text was unavailable in English. The methodological quality of the included studies averaged 7.67. Continuous passive motion was found to improve shoulder range of motion in two studies. One study found a decrease in pain in the intervention group and one study found that continuous passive motion improves muscle strength. Conclusion: Continuous passive motion is safe to use with physiotherapy treatment following rotator cuff repair surgery. It may help to prevent secondary complications post operatively.
Article
Objective.—To evaluate the efficacy of continuous passive motion (CPM) in the postoperative management of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Design.—A randomized controlled single-blind trial of CPM plus standardized rehabilitation vs standard rehabilitation alone. Setting.—A referral hospital for arthritis and musculoskeletal care. Patients.—Consecutive patients with end-stage osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty who had at least 90° of passive knee flexion. One hundred fifty-four patients were eligible and 102 patients agreed to participate and were randomized. Ninety-three patients completed the study protocol. Intervention.—Continuous passive motion machines programmed for rate and specified arc of motion within 24 hours of surgery with range increased daily as tolerated with standardized rehabilitation program compared with standardized rehabilitation program alone. Main Outcome Measures.—Primary outcomes were pain, active and passive knee range of motion, swelling (or circumference), quadriceps strength at postoperative day 7, as well as complications, length of stay, and active and passive range of motion and function at 6 weeks. Results.—Use of CPM increased active flexion and decreased swelling and the need for manipulations but did not significantly affect pain, active and passive extension, quadriceps strength, or length of hospital stay. At 6 weeks there were no differences between the two groups in either range of motion or function. In this series, use of CPM resulted in a net savings of $6764 over conventional rehabilitation in achieving these results. Conclusion.—For the average patient undergoing total knee arthroplasty, CPM is more effective in improving range of motion, decreasing swelling, and reducing the need for manipulation than is conventional therapy and lowers cost.
Article
This article presents a review of the basic science and current research on the use of continuous passive motion therapy after surgery for an intra-articular fracture. This information is useful for surgeons in the postoperative management of intra-articular fractures in determining the best course of treatment to reduce complications and facilitate quicker recovery.
Article
Aims and objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of continuous passive motion on the range of motion, postoperative pain and life quality of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty within six months after the operation. Background: Total knee arthroplasty reduces pain and improves range of motion of the osteoarthritic knee joint. Continuous passive motion increases postoperative movement, but there is some controversy regarding whether aggressive continuous passive motion can improve range of motion or life quality, and whether it induces more pain. Design: A prospective controlled study was conducted in a medical centre in Taiwan from January to December 2006. Methods: One hundred and seven patients were recruited. The patients underwent the basic rehabilitation protocols (the control group) or the basic rehabilitation protocols and additional daily use of continuous passive motion for more than six hours per day (the experimental group). The range of motion, modified Short Form-36 (SF-36) and semi-quantitative visual analogue scale were recorded. Results. Range of motion increased from 109° preoperatively to 125° at six months postoperatively in the treatment group and from 111° preoperatively to 125° at six months postoperatively in the control group. Visual analogue scale decreased from 7·78 preoperatively to 0·37 at six months postoperatively in the treatment group and from 7·92 preoperatively to 0·21 at six months postoperatively in the control group. The SF-36 improved from 3·76 preoperatively to 1·77 at six months postoperatively in the treatment group and from 3·68 preoperatively to 1·83 at six months postoperatively in the control group. There was no significant difference in range of motion, visual analogue scale and SF-36 between groups at each visit. Conclusion: With the advances in total knee arthroplasty surgical technique, aggressive continuous passive motion does not provide obvious benefits. Relevance to clinical practice: Total knee arthroplasty can alleviate pain and improve range of motion, but aggressive continuous passive motion does not provide additional benefits.
Article
To evaluate the efficacy of continuous passive motion (CPM) in the postoperative management of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. A randomized controlled single-blind trial of CPM plus standardized rehabilitation vs standard rehabilitation alone. A referral hospital for arthritis and musculoskeletal care. Consecutive patients with end-stage osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty who had at least 90 degrees of passive knee flexion. One hundred fifty-four patients were eligible and 102 patients agreed to participate and were randomized. Ninety-three patients completed the study protocol. Continuous passive motion machines programmed for rate and specified arc of motion within 24 hours of surgery with range increased daily as tolerated with standardized rehabilitation program compared with standardized rehabilitation program alone. Primary outcomes were pain, active and passive knee range of motion, swelling (or circumference), quadriceps strength at postoperative day 7, as well as complications, length of stay, and active and passive range of motion and function at 6 weeks. Use of CPM increased active flexion and decreased swelling and the need for manipulations but did not significantly affect pain, active and passive extension, quadriceps strength, or length of hospital stay. At 6 weeks there were no differences between the two groups in either range of motion or function. In this series, use of CPM resulted in a net savings of $6764 over conventional rehabilitation in achieving these results. For the average patient undergoing total knee arthroplasty, CPM is more effective in improving range of motion, decreasing swelling, and reducing the need for manipulation than is conventional therapy and lowers cost.
Article
The notoriously limited capacity of articular cartilage to heal or to regenerate plus the author's clinical observations and research on the deleterious effects of immobilization on joints led him to the biologic concept of continuous passive motion (CPM) of synovial joints in 1970. The hypothesis that CPM should stimulate pluripotential mesenchymal cells to differentiate into articular cartilage and should accelerate the healing of articular tissues has been validated by numerous scientific investigations of a variety of experimental models of the knee joint. These models have included full-thickness defects, intraarticular fractures, acute septic arthritis, partial thickness lacerations of the patellar tendon, semitendinosus tenodesis to replace the medial collateral ligament, autogeneic osteoperiosteal grafts in major defects, free autogeneic periosteal grafts, and periosteal allografts. In 1978, the author collaborated with Saringer, an engineer, to develop CPM devices for humans. CPM is clinically indicated following such procedures as open reduction of fractures, arthrolysis for posttraumatic arthritis, synovectomy, drainage of septic arthritis, release of joint contractures, total arthroplasty, tendon repair, and ligament reconstruction. Clinically, CPM is an important stimulus to joint regeneration processes.
Article
We established a clinical retrospective study to determine the benefit of continuous passive motion after total knee replacement. Nineteen patients who had continuous passive motion (CPM) after total knee replacement were compared to a control group of 15 patients who did not have CPM. The number of days to discharge was 16 for the CPM group and 20 for the control group. When the patients with complications from CPM were excluded from the CPM group, the average number of days to discharge for the CPM group was 12. The average number of postoperative days before reaching 90 degrees of knee flexion was nine in the CPM group as compared to 16 days in the control group. The average blood loss was not significantly different in the two groups. There were four wound healing complications in the CPM group. All four complications occurred in patients who achieved 90 degrees of knee flexion in less than six days postoperatively. We developed a protocol for maximal use of CPM without significant wound complications after total knee surgery.
Article
The authors report the results obtained in 16 patients affected with displaced fracture of the acetabulum treated surgically and mobilized passively immediately after surgery by means of a continuous passive mobilization apparatus for the hip. The age of the patients at the time of trauma ranged from 21 to 54 years. The posterior wall was involved in 12 cases, while the anterior column was also involved in 4. Excellent or good reduction of the fracture was obtained in all of the cases. Immediately after surgery, a continuous passive motion apparatus for the hip was applied to be used for approximately 3 weeks. At final follow-up, which was obtained after a mean time of 5 years, all of the patients except 2 had obtained good results. Moderate joint deficit was present in 1 case, while sciatic nerve palsy that had already been observed prior to surgery persisted in another. Evident radiographic signs of coxarthrosis were not present in any of the cases. Based on the opinion of Salter et al. (1980), who in an experimental study had observed better healing of the cartilaginous lesions in the joints submitted to movement, immediately after surgery we applied a continuous passive motion apparatus for the hip in a group of patients affected with fracture of the acetabulum. As none of the patient followed-up by us presented evident signs of hip arthrosis, the authors hypothesize that continuous passive movement, immediately carried out after osteosynthesis, plays a significant role in preventing post-traumatic arthrosis of the hip. In truth, small irregularities of the acetabular cavity, possibly present after an apparently anatomical reduction, could be minimized by the plasmating effect of the head of the femur in movement.
Article
Motion‐based therapies have been applied to promote healing of arthritic joints. The goal of the current study was to determine the early molecular events that are responsible for the beneficial actions of motion‐based therapies on meniscal fibrocartilage. Rabbit knees with Antigen‐Induced‐Arthritis (AIA) were exposed to continuous passive motion (CPM) for 24 or 48 h and compared to immobilized knees. The menisci were harvested and glycosaminoglycans (GAG), interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β), matrix metalloproteinase‐1 (MMP‐1), cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2), and interleukin‐10 (IL‐10) were determined by histochemical analysis. Within 24 h, immobilized knees exhibited marked GAG degradation. The expression of proinflammatory mediators MMP‐1, COX‐2, and IL‐1β was notably increased within 24 h and continued to increase during the next 24 h in immobilized knees. Knees subjected to CPM revealed a rapid and sustained decrease in GAG degradation and the expression of all proinflammatory mediators during the entire period of CPM treatment. More importantly, CPM induced synthesis of the anti‐inflammatory cytokine IL‐10. The results demonstrate that mechanical signals generated by CPM exert potent anti‐inflammatory signals on meniscal fibrochondrocytes. Furthermore, these studies explain the molecular basis of the beneficial effects of CPM observed on articular cartilage and suggest that CPM suppresses the inflammatory process of arthritis more efficiently than immobilization. © 2005 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis
  • L A Harvey
  • L Brosseau
  • R D Herbert
L.A. Harvey, L. Brosseau, R.D. Herbert. Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;6(2):CD004260.