ArticlePublisher preview available

The moment of tooth: rate, fate and pattern of Pacific lingcod dentition revealed by pulse-chase

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Tooth replacement rates of polyphyodont cartilaginous and bony fishes are hard to determine because of a lack of obvious patterning and maintaining specimens long enough to observe replacement. Pulse-chase is a fluorescent technique that differentially colours developing mineralized tissue. We present in situ tooth replacement rate and position data for the oral and pharyngeal detentions of Ophiodon elongatus (Pacific lingcod). We assessed over 10 000 teeth, in 20 fish, and found a daily replacement rate of about two teeth (3.6% of the dentition). The average tooth is in the dental battery for 27 days. The replacement was higher in the lower pharyngeal jaw (LPJ). We found no difference between replacement rates of feeding and non-feeding fish, suggesting feeding was not a driver of tooth replacement. Lingcod teeth have both a size and location fate; smaller teeth at one spot will not grow into larger teeth, even if a large tooth nearby is lost. We also found increased rates of replacement at the posterior of the LPJ relative to the anterior. We propose that lingcod teeth do not migrate in the jaw as they develop; their teeth are fated in size and location, erupting in their functional position.
royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rspb
Research
Cite this article: Carr EM, Summers AP,
Cohen KE. 2021 The moment of tooth: rate,
fate and pattern of Pacific lingcod dentition
revealed by pulse-chase. Proc. R. Soc. B 288:
20211436.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1436
Received: 24 June 2021
Accepted: 21 September 2021
Subject Category:
Morphology and biomechanics
Subject Areas:
physiology, developmental biology, evolution
Keywords:
replacement, teeth, polyphyodont, fluorescence
Author for correspondence:
E. M. Carr
e-mail: emilycarr1@mail.usf.edu
Electronic supplementary material is available
online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.
c.5647960.
The moment of tooth: rate, fate and
pattern of Pacific lingcod dentition
revealed by pulse-chase
E. M. Carr
1
, A. P. Summers
2
and K. E. Cohen
3
1
Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
2
Friday Harbor Labs, University of Washington, Friday Harbor, WA, USA
3
Biology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
EMC, 0000-0001-7985-863X
Tooth replacement rates of polyphyodont cartilaginous and bony fishes are
hard to determine because of a lack of obvious patterning and maintaining
specimens long enough to observe replacement. Pulse-chase is a fluorescent
technique that differentially colours developing mineralized tissue. We pre-
sent in situ tooth replacement rate and position data for the oral and
pharyngeal detentions of Ophiodon elongatus (Pacific lingcod). We assessed
over 10 000 teeth, in 20 fish, and found a daily replacement rate of about
two teeth (3.6% of the dentition). The average tooth is in the dental battery
for 27 days. The replacement was higher in the lower pharyngeal jaw (LPJ).
We found no difference between replacement rates of feeding and non-
feeding fish, suggesting feeding was not a driver of tooth replacement.
Lingcod teeth have both a size and location fate; smaller teeth at one spot
will not grow into larger teeth, even if a large tooth nearby is lost. We
also found increased rates of replacement at the posterior of the LPJ relative
to the anterior. We propose that lingcod teeth do not migrate in the jaw as
they develop; their teeth are fated in size and location, erupting in their
functional position.
1. Background
Vertebrate dentitions fall into two loose categoriesdiphyodont dentitions
with a single set of replacement teeth, and polyphyodont dentitions where
teeth are replaced continuously. Genetic pathways for tooth development are
conserved across both types of dentition [1,2], and the diversity of tooth
shapes and dental batteries lie in differential regulation of the same genetic tool-
box [3,4]. Some polyphyodonts have fated replacement teeth, where an
individual tooth is destined to replace a functional tooth at a specific location
[2]. Sharks present an interesting example of tooth fate because though the
teeth are morphologically similar, they nevertheless have a distinct identity.
Each functional tooth has a file of replacements lined up behind it [5,6]. Bony
fishes offer many examples where it is difficult to see a replacement tooth
having an identity relative to a functional tooth, the non-fated condition. For
example, in the fine, dense, spatulate dentition of loricariid catfishes, any par-
ticular well-hooked tooth is much like any other, and replacements come in
from behind without a clear link to an old tooth [7]. It remains to be determined
whether morphologically homodont teleosts have identifiable replacement
teeth that will emerge to fill a particular position or role in the dental battery [8].
A fundamental question in polyphyodont dentitions is whether replacement
is driven by damage [9,10]does a new tooth grow in response to a broken tooth,
or does it appear because certain regions of the jawexperience greater mechanical
stress [8,9,11]? This complexity is best showcased in the en bloc replacement of one-
quarter of the entire dental battery by piranhas [11]. This maintainsthe integrity of
an interlocked, sharp and serrated dental battery, and certainly is not a response to
every tooth becoming damaged. However, we do not know whether it is a
© 2021 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Spines are ubiquitous in both plants and animals, and while most spines were likely originally used for defense, over time many have been modified in a variety of ways. Here we take an integrative approach to review the form, function, and evolution of spines as a defensive strategy in order to make new connections between physical mechanisms and functional behavior. While this review focuses on spines in mammals, we reference and draw ideas from the literature on spines in other taxa, including plants. We begin by exploring the biomechanics of defensive spines, their varied functions, and non-defensive modifications. We pay particular attention to the mechanics involved in passive puncture and the ways organisms have overcome limitations associated with the low energy input. We then focus on the ecological, physiological, and behavioral factors that promote the evolution of spiny defenses, including predator- and habitat-mediated hypotheses. While there is considerable evidence to support both, studies have generally found that (1) defensive spines are usually effective against one class of attacker (e.g., larger predators) but ineffective against others or even facilitate predation by others, and (2) species that are more visible or exposed to predators are under much stronger selection to evolve defensive spines or some other robust defense. What type of defensive morphology that evolves, however, is less predictable and probably strongly dependent on both the dominant source of predation and the habitat structure of the organism (e.g., arboreal, terrestrial, fossorial). We then explore traits that are often correlated with defensive spines and armor, potentially forming armor syndromes, suites of traits that evolve together with body armor in a correlated fashion. In mammals, these include aposematic warning coloration, locomotion style, diet, metabolic rate, and relative brain size. Finally, we encourage integration of mechanistic and evolutionary studies of defensive spines and suggest future avenues of research in the biomechanics, evolution, and behavior of spines and spiny organisms.
Article
Full-text available
Vertebrate dentitions are often collapsed into a few discrete categories, obscuring both potentially important functional differences between them and insight into their evolution. The terms homodonty and heterodonty typically conflate tooth morphology with tooth function, and require context-dependent subcategories to take on any specific meaning. Qualifiers like incipient, transient, or phylogenetic homodonty attempt to provide a more rigorous definition but instead highlight the difficulties in categorizing dentitions. To address these issues, we recently proposed a method for quantifying the function of dental batteries based on the estimated stress of each tooth (inferred using surface area) standardized for jaw out-lever (inferred using tooth position). This method reveals a homodonty-heterodonty functional continuum where small and large teeth work together to transmit forces to a prey item. Morphological homodonty or heterodonty refers to morphology, whereas functional homodonty or heterodonty refers to transmission of stress. In this study, we use Halichoeres wrasses to explore how functional continuum can be used in phylogenetic analyses by generating two continuous metrics from the functional homodonty-heterodonty continuum. Here we show that functionally heterodont teeth have evolved at least three times in Halichoeres wrasses. There are more functionally heterodont teeth on upper jaws than on lower jaws, but functionally heterodont teeth on the lower jaws bear significantly more stress. These nuances, which have functional consequences, would be missed by binning entire dentitions into discrete categories. This analysis points out areas worth taking a closer look at from a mechanical and developmental point of view with respect to the distribution and type of heterodonty seen in different jaws and different areas of jaws. These data, on a small group of wrasses, suggest continuous dental variables can be a rich source of insight into the evolution of fish feeding mechanisms across a wider variety of species.
Article
Full-text available
Fitness is in part determined by the success of prey capture, often achieved in marine piscivores using teeth to capture and process prey. In ram feeding piscivores, a pattern of monognathic heterodonty has been observed where tooth size either increases posteriorly (Scomberomorus maculatus), or anteriorly (Carcharhinus limbatus), with exceptions such as Trichiurus lepturus and Sphyraena barracuda which have large anterior fangs. Tooth size and placement, as related to prey capture, was examined in Atlantic Spanish Mackerel (S. maculatus), Great Barracuda (S. barracuda), Atlantic Cutlassfish (T. lepturus), and the Blacktip shark (C. limbatus) by quantifying tooth occlusion along the jaw. Percent gape at occlusion in S. maculatus decreased anteriorly in a linear fashion, indicating occlusion from posterior to anterior. Therefore, prey initially contact the posterior teeth with high puncture pressure during high velocity strikes, capitalizing the region of greatest bite force. For S. barracuda and T. lepturus, posterior teeth and premaxillary fangs occlude at similar percent gapes (within 10%). The premaxillary fangs are likely used for initial capture due to the high angular velocity of the anterior section of the jaw and then for cutting, due to their laterally compressed shape. In C. limbatus all teeth occluded within a narrow range of 1.4–8.8% gape, indicating that all teeth meet at almost complete jaw closure. Simultaneous puncture of teeth prevents prey escape while maximizing the cutting area during head shaking. Thus, various tooth size and dentition patterns may yield similar success in prey capture, serving the same function.
Article
Full-text available
Tooth replacement in piranhas is unusual: all teeth on one side of the head are lost as a unit, then replaced simultaneously. We used histology and microCT to examine tooth-replacement modes across carnivorous piranhas and their herbivorous pacu cousins (Serrasalmidae) and then mapped replacement patterns onto a molecular phylogeny. Pacu teeth develop and are replaced in a manner like piranhas. For serrasalmids, unilateral tooth replacement is not an "all or nothing" phenomenon; we demonstrate that both sides of the jaws have developing tooth rows within them, albeit with one side more mineralized than the other. All serrasalmids (except one) share unilateral tooth replacement, so this is not an adaptation for carnivory. All serrasalmids have interlocking teeth; piranhas interdigitate lateral tooth cusps with adjacent teeth, forming a singular saw-like blade, whereas lateral cusps in pacus clasp together. For serrasalmids to have an interlocking dentition, their teeth need to develop and erupt at the same time. We propose that interlocking mechanisms prevent tooth loss and ensure continued functionality of the feeding apparatus. Serrasalmid dentitions are ubiquitously heterodont, having incisiform and molariform dentitions reminiscent of mammals. Finally, we propose that simultaneous tooth replacement be considered as a synapomorphy for the family.
Article
Full-text available
Significance Good examples of the relative autonomy of organ development are teeth, and for decades researchers have cultured isolated mouse teeth on a petri dish by starting from the earliest recognizable stage. We have cultured cheek teeth of voles, another species of rodent, and show how the cultured vole teeth lack their species-specific morphology. Based on computational modeling, 3D imaging, and experiments in which we culture mouse and vole teeth between microscopic braces, we suggest that the development of vole tooth shape requires the lateral support of the jaw. Because mice lack the vole-specific morphology, the requirement of the jaw for tooth shape has not been possible to uncover previously. Comparative studies are required for the understanding of organogenesis.
Article
Most jawed vertebrates (gnathostomes) replace their teeth throughout life (polyphyodonty) and there is currently great interest in its molecular and cellular basis, particularly in fish. While much has still to be elucidated, it appears that whichever tooth replacement mechanism is used, only one tooth replaces one predecessor, at any one time. Here we present fossil crushing dentitions of two extinct pycnodont fishes, Pycnodus zeaformis and Pycnodus maliensis. Their surface features and x‐ray micro‐CT virtual sections show no evidence of one‐for‐one replacement. Instead, individual large teeth were replaced by multiple small teeth, for which, as far as we could ascertain, there is no known mechanism. This occurred where underlying dentigerous bone was damaged. Small teeth also developed where parts of large teeth had broken off, and in gaps between large teeth created by the geometry of their close alignment in rows. We compared the virtual sections to those of functionally analogous crushing dentitions of three modern fishes. Contrasting greatly to the pycnodonts, each showed an orderly, one‐for‐one replacement, typical of osteichthyans. We propose that the pycnodont specimens exhibit a gap‐filling tooth addition hitherto unseen in gnathostomes, and that the oral epithelium retained an initiatory competence throughout life, with a programming of ‘if a gap exists, fill it’. This would also have facilitated the addition of large teeth in rows, in space provided by ontogenetic growth. We hypothesize that gaps were registered as an absence of pressure at the crushing surface, initiating tooth development, as in the modern cichlid Astatoreochromis alluaudi.
Article
Teeth tell the tale of interactions between predator and prey. If a dental battery is made up of teeth that look similar, they are morphologically homodont, but if there is an unspecified amount of regional specialization in size or shape, they are morphologically heterodont. These are vague terms with no useful functional implication because morphological homodonty does not necessarily equal functional homodonty. Teeth that look the same may not function the same. Conical teeth are prevalent in fishes, superficially tasked with the simple job of puncture. There is a great deal of variation in the shape and placement of conical teeth. Anterior teeth may be larger than posterior ones, larger teeth may be surrounded by small ones, and patches of teeth may all have the same size and shape. Such variations suggest that conical dentitions might represent a single morphological solution for different functional problems. We are interested in the concept of homodonty and using the conical tooth as a model to differentiate between tooth shape and performance. We consider the stress that a tooth can exert on prey as stress is what causes damage. To create a statistical measure of functional homodonty, stress was calculated from measurements of surface area, position, and applied force. Functional homodonty is then defined as the degree to which teeth along the jaw all bear/exert similar stresses despite changes in shape. We find that morphologically heterodont teeth are often functionally homodont and that position is a better predictor of performance than shape. Furthermore, the arrangement of teeth affects their function, such that there is a functional advantage to having several smaller teeth surrounding a singular large tooth. We demonstrate that this arrangement of teeth is useful to grab, rather than tear, prey upon puncture, with the smaller teeth dissipating large stress forces around the larger tooth. We show that measurements of how shape affects stress distribution in response to loading give us a clearer picture of the evolution of conically shaped teeth. Teeth tell the tale of interactions between predator and prey. If a dental battery is made up of teeth that look similar, they are morphologically homodont, but if there is an unspecified amount of regional specialization in size or shape, they are morphologically heterodont. Functional homodonty is a statistical metric that lets us explore how different combinations of teeth work together.
Article
Synopsis Teeth lie at the interface between an animal and its environment and, with some exceptions, act as a major component of resource procurement through food acquisition and processing. Therefore, the shape of a tooth is closely tied to the type of food being eaten. This tight relationship is of use to biologists describing the natural history of species and given the high instance of tooth preservation in the fossil record, is especially useful for paleontologists. However, correlating gross tooth morphology to diet is only part of the story, and much more can be learned through the study of dental biomechanics. We can explore the mechanics of how teeth work, how different shapes evolved, and the underlying forces that constrain tooth shape. This review aims to provide an overview of the research on dental biomechanics, in both mammalian and non-mammalian teeth, and to synthesize two main approaches to dental biomechanics to develop an integrative framework for classifying and evaluating dental functional morphology. This framework relates food material properties to the dynamics of food processing, in particular how teeth transfer energy to food items, and how these mechanical considerations may have shaped the evolution of tooth morphology. We also review advances in technology and new techniques that have allowed more in-depth studies of tooth form and function.