A preview of this full-text is provided by The Royal Society.
Content available from Proceedings of the Royal Society B
This content is subject to copyright.
royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rspb
Research
Cite this article: Carr EM, Summers AP,
Cohen KE. 2021 The moment of tooth: rate,
fate and pattern of Pacific lingcod dentition
revealed by pulse-chase. Proc. R. Soc. B 288:
20211436.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1436
Received: 24 June 2021
Accepted: 21 September 2021
Subject Category:
Morphology and biomechanics
Subject Areas:
physiology, developmental biology, evolution
Keywords:
replacement, teeth, polyphyodont, fluorescence
Author for correspondence:
E. M. Carr
e-mail: emilycarr1@mail.usf.edu
Electronic supplementary material is available
online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.
c.5647960.
The moment of tooth: rate, fate and
pattern of Pacific lingcod dentition
revealed by pulse-chase
E. M. Carr
1
, A. P. Summers
2
and K. E. Cohen
3
1
Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
2
Friday Harbor Labs, University of Washington, Friday Harbor, WA, USA
3
Biology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
EMC, 0000-0001-7985-863X
Tooth replacement rates of polyphyodont cartilaginous and bony fishes are
hard to determine because of a lack of obvious patterning and maintaining
specimens long enough to observe replacement. Pulse-chase is a fluorescent
technique that differentially colours developing mineralized tissue. We pre-
sent in situ tooth replacement rate and position data for the oral and
pharyngeal detentions of Ophiodon elongatus (Pacific lingcod). We assessed
over 10 000 teeth, in 20 fish, and found a daily replacement rate of about
two teeth (3.6% of the dentition). The average tooth is in the dental battery
for 27 days. The replacement was higher in the lower pharyngeal jaw (LPJ).
We found no difference between replacement rates of feeding and non-
feeding fish, suggesting feeding was not a driver of tooth replacement.
Lingcod teeth have both a size and location fate; smaller teeth at one spot
will not grow into larger teeth, even if a large tooth nearby is lost. We
also found increased rates of replacement at the posterior of the LPJ relative
to the anterior. We propose that lingcod teeth do not migrate in the jaw as
they develop; their teeth are fated in size and location, erupting in their
functional position.
1. Background
Vertebrate dentitions fall into two loose categories—diphyodont dentitions
with a single set of replacement teeth, and polyphyodont dentitions where
teeth are replaced continuously. Genetic pathways for tooth development are
conserved across both types of dentition [1,2], and the diversity of tooth
shapes and dental batteries lie in differential regulation of the same genetic tool-
box [3,4]. Some polyphyodonts have fated replacement teeth, where an
individual tooth is destined to replace a functional tooth at a specific location
[2]. Sharks present an interesting example of tooth fate because though the
teeth are morphologically similar, they nevertheless have a distinct identity.
Each functional tooth has a file of replacements lined up behind it [5,6]. Bony
fishes offer many examples where it is difficult to see a replacement tooth
having an identity relative to a functional tooth, the non-fated condition. For
example, in the fine, dense, spatulate dentition of loricariid catfishes, any par-
ticular well-hooked tooth is much like any other, and replacements come in
from behind without a clear link to an old tooth [7]. It remains to be determined
whether morphologically homodont teleosts have identifiable replacement
teeth that will emerge to fill a particular position or role in the dental battery [8].
A fundamental question in polyphyodont dentitions is whether replacement
is driven by damage [9,10]—does a new tooth grow in response to a broken tooth,
or does it appear because certain regions of the jawexperience greater mechanical
stress [8,9,11]? This complexity is best showcased in the en bloc replacement of one-
quarter of the entire dental battery by piranhas [11]. This maintainsthe integrity of
an interlocked, sharp and serrated dental battery, and certainly is not a response to
every tooth becoming damaged. However, we do not know whether it is a
© 2021 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.