ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Beekeeping has been practiced in Nepal for a long time,beginning with the traditional log hive for personal consumption and progressing to the contemporary hive for commercial purpose.It has received a lot of attention in recent years in Nepal because of its minimal input and high output outcomes.Despite its growing popularity,beekeepers in Nepal confront a number of obstacles,including poor bee management,colony migration and absconding,pest and foes attack,insufficient bee research program and erroneous data on bee floral recognition.This review paper highlights the current state of beekeeping in Nepal,as well as honeybee species and honey production potential for long-term livelihoods.This paper emphasizes the enormous potential for commercial beekeeping as well as the challenges that it faces and suggestions for improving it.
Socio Economy and Policy Studies (SEPS) 1(1) (2021) 36-38
Quick Response Code
Access this article online
Website:
www.seps.com.my
DOI:
10.26480/seps.01.2021.36.38
Cite The Ar ticle:
Deepi ka Manand har, Di pak Khana l (2021) .
Beeke eping in Nepal and Its Status, Challe nges a nd Possibi lities: A Review.
Socio Economy and Policy
Studi es, 1(1 ): 36-38
.
ISSN: 2785-8715 (Online)
CODEN: SEPSCJ
REVIEW ARTICLE
Socio Economy and Policy Studies
(SEPS)
DOI: http://doi.org/10.26480/seps.01.2021.36.38
BEEKEEPING IN NEPAL AND ITS STATUS, CHALLENGES AND POSSIBILITIES: A
REVIEW
Deepika Manandhar*, Dipak Khanal
Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Paklihawa, Nepal
*Corresponding Autor Email: deepikamanandhar01@gmail.com
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ARTICLE DETAILS
ABSTRACT
Article History:
Received 26 August 2021
Accepted 29 September 2021
Available online 04 October 2021
Beekeeping has been practiced in Nepal for a long time,beginning with the traditional log hive for personal
consumption and progressing to the contemporary hive for commercial purpose.It has received a lot of
attention in recent years in Nepal because of its minimal input and high output outcomes.Despite its growing
popularity,beekeepers in Nepal confront a number of obstacles,including poor bee management,colony
migration and absconding,pest and foes attack,insufficient bee research program and erroneous data on bee
floral recognition.This review paper highlights the current state of beekeeping in Nepal,as well as honeybee
species and honey production potential for long-term livelihoods.This paper emphasizes the enormous
potential for commercial beekeeping as well as the challenges that it faces and suggestions for improving it.
KEYWORDS
Beekeeping, Honey production, Honey hunting, Floral diversity, Threats, Potentality
1. INTRODUCTION
Honey bees are a key pollinator of fruits,flowers and vegetables and are a
very valuable insect.Beekeeping has been practiced to utilize bee products
like honey and wax. Not only that,it also provides a variety of benefits such
as revenue generating,job possibilities,nutritious food as well as
development of sustainable agriculture through pollination services in
Nepal.Traditional log hives and contemporary hives are the two types of
beehives typically utilized in Nepalese beekeeping. When it comes to
traditional log hives, they need minimal management,are inexpensive and
use locally accessible materials, but they produce low yields and have
higher risk of ant invasion which leads some bee colonies to flee (Allen,
1995). Overcoming these flaws,the modern hive generates a higher
production and has a very low absconding rate. Even though the modern
hive offers various advantages.it is out of reach for poor farmers.Each
modern hive cost around Rs.10000.
Nepal has a wide range of climatic conditions and a vast floral diversity,
which allows for the presence of a variety of bee species such as Apis
cerena, Apis mellifera, Apis florea, Apis dorsata and Apis laboriosa. Among
these, the only domesticated honeybee species are A.cerena and
A.mellifera.(Publications, n.d.)(Pfeffer & Wolf, 2020). The most commonly
utilized for beekeeping is A.cerena, which is endemic to the terai region
and mountain valleys below 2300 m.A.mellifera was recently introduced
to Nepal and can now be found in the Kathmandu valley.A.cerena is more
popular and preferable to A.mellifera as it is less susceptible to nosema
disease and predatory wasp invasion (Theisen-Jones & Bienefeld, 2016).
Other species, despite not being domesticated, can be found in the wild
establishing their own colonies.Dwarf honeybees,A.florea are native to the
Terai region and warmer mountain valleys below 1000 m(Thapa, 1996).
A.dorsata,the gaint honeybee is seen building honeycomb below 1350
m.A.laboriosa inhabits in Himalayan ranges of Nepal between 1500 and
4000 m.
Despite its economic importance,beekeeping is in steep decline and is on
verge of extinction in its natural habitat.Native bee populations in the
region are being harmed by habitat change from extremely diverse
ecosystems to significantly less diverse ecosystems,particularly owing to
deforestation.This habitat damage may result in the extinction of certain
types of bee flora.A.cerena colonies have been severely afflicted by
ailments such as nosema,viral clusters,sacbrood diseases and European
foul brood disease.Natural enemies of bees include
mites,wasps,lizards,ants and rodents,all of which have contributed to the
decline of bee populations.Given the obstacles,if adequate
manangement,frequent inspection and care are provided,there is high
potentiality of beekeeping in Nepal due to floral diversity ranging from
presence of Rhododendron sps in the mountain region to Brassica
campestris in the Terai region.
2. METHODOLOGY
The primary and secondary methods are used in this review paper.In
terms of the primary method,several beekeeping farms were visited and a
few beekeepers in the Rupandehi district were questioned.The photos
were taken during a visit to a bee farm in the Rupandehi district.It is also
reviewed using secondary method,which involved reviewing a variety of
available research papers published in journals,in national and
international seminars and annual reports.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
There are two forms of beekeeing:Traditional hive and Modern beehive in
Nepal.Traditional A.cerena beekeeping is the most popular beekeeping
conducted by farmers in Nepal’s rural areas.It only necessitates a small
amount of financial commitment and management compared to modern
beehive.Log and wall hives are the most commonly utilized traditional
behives.Log hives are built of wood(mainly Sal tree),have one or two
entrance holes and sealed at the ends with a stopper and mud.They are
placed horizontally,generally from ropes,on the external walls or under
the eaves of farmer’s house to prevent colony losses due to predator
Socio Economy and Policy Studies (SEPS) 1(1) (2021) 36-38
Cite The Ar ticle:
Deepi ka Manand har, Di pak Khana l (2021) .
Beeke eping in Nepal and Its Status, Challe nges a nd Possibi lities: A Review.
Socio Economy and Policy
Studi es, 1(1 ): 36-38
.
attacks.Wall hives are cube-shaped chambers integrated into the structure
of a house.A little aperture on the outside allows bees to enter,while a
wooden door within the house permits honey gathering(Allen, 1995).
Modern beehives have recently become popular in Nepal(Bhusal et al.,
2011).It comes with replaceable frames that apiarists can use to check for
illnesses and parasites.Frames are thin rectangular constructions made of
wood or plastic that are hung parallel inside the boxes.Each hive has ten
frames with the appropriate amount of bee space between them.A modern
beehive comprises of a hive stand,bottom board(bee entry),broad
box(where queen lays her eggs),honey super(where honey is
stored),inner cover(a feeding shelf), and an outer cover that protects the
hive from the extreme weather.It is ideal for honey production on a large
scale.Modern hives make bee colony management and transportation
simple.Honey is extracted using a centrifugal honey extractor, which
allows honey to be removed without causing damage to the
comb.However,it is prohibitively expensive for poor farmers and the
construction of the hive necessitates a high level of craftsmanship.
A
B
C
Figure 1: A.Modern beehive in Jyotinagar, Rupandehi, B.A.cerena bee,
C.Traditional log hive seen in Nayamil
4. HONEY HUNTING
Honey hunting or Tamumai in Tibetan, is a practice of collecting honey
from wild bee species especially Apis dorsata, practiced by the gurungs,a
Nepalese highland tribe.A huge A.dorsata single comb nest hangs midway
up the rock to gain enough sunshine and defend themselves from
predators.Honey hunting is a risky adventure that involves harvesting
honey from these large nest.The method entails using smoke to subdue
and repel aggressive bees as well as a ladder built from mountain bamboo
cortical thread.The ladder is suspended from the cliff’s top and is firmly
attached to the trees on both sides.The honey hunter climbed down the
ladder,chopped the honey combs and gathered them in the
basket.Gurungs generally love chewing honeycomb lumps.They spit out
the wax and the juices they consume make them pleasantly drunk.Honey
is most commonly used as a sweetener in rice and wheat flour.Honey is
occasionally heated and blended with popped rice or barley or allowed to
cool into toffee for kids(Strickland, 1982)(Gathering et al., 2019).
4.1 Floral Diversity
Beekeeping success is determined not just by honeybee
strains,management and hive structures,but also by the abundance and
availability of bee floral plants around bee farming area(Pokhrel,
n.d.).Artificial feeding during the cold and rainy months as well as other
management methods, must be considered.The colony development
periods were reported to be early spring(mid-February to mid-March)
and autumn(mid-August to mid-September). Plant species like Caryopteris
odorata,Leucosceptrum canum,Buddleia spp.,Prunus domestica, Prunus
domestica,Prunus persica and Eupatorium spp during early spring season
and Rhus spp.,Porana grandiflora,Glycine max,Osbeckia stellate and Rubus
spp during autumn season helps to flourish colony of bee.Rainy season and
winter season are death periods for beekeeping with low
temperature,very few flowering species like Reinwardtia
indica,Pogestemon glaber,Caesalpinia spp.,Eupatorium spp and more
uncertain death of honeybees(Bista & Shivakoti, 1970)(Cholis et al., 2020).
4.2 Honey Production and Demand
Honey is fundamentally a product and a source of long-term income for
poor beekeepers and traditional honey hunters.Honey comes in a variety
of brands in Nepal’s market.According to available data,Nepal generates
1105 metric tons of honey,with 330 metric tons coming from A.cerena,400
metric tons from wild bees nad roughly 375 metric tons coming from
A.mellifera.The domestic demand for honey is expected to be over 300
metric tons.Nepal exports a little amount of honey to other nations but
imports a large amount of honey from other countries.Many nations
outside of Nepal like Norway have banned Nepali honey due to pesticide
residue concerns(Sivaram, 2012).
5. CHALLENGES
Several biotic and abiotic causative agents such as parasite mite
infestations,bacterial and viral infections,pesticide
contamination,frequent queen losses,poor management,genetic
weakening,habitat fragmentation,transgenic plant cultivation,migratory
stress and climatic variability are some of the challenges responsible for
widespread decline in honey bee populations(Thapa, 1996).A significant
percentage of bee illness and mortality has been documented,posing
serious issues for food security and biodiversity preservation in
Nepal.Beekeepers and researchers have been paying close attention to the
dramatic decline in honey bee numbers as a result of agricultural
intensification,widespread use of agriculturally administered insecticides
and environmental degradation.Loss of floral diversity due to
urbanization and industrialization is one of the major challenges that
needed to be address in time(Potts et al., 2010).
Hornets have been identified as the most dangerous bee
predators.V.velutina and V.mandarina are the most abundant and serious
enemies of honey bees in beekeeping(Ranabhat & Tamrakar,
2009)Neupane, 2009).Among six species of birds,Dicrurus macrocercus
and Dicrurus aeneus are serious perdators which mainly feed on flying
honeybees during rainy seasons(Bista et al., 2020).Species of ants such as
Componatus sp.,Monomorium sp., and Myrmica sp are seen attacking
beehives.Palatar indicus,Ariope areuta are species of spider found
attacking beehives.One species od beetle, One chalcid and lizards were
identified as natural enemies of bees. Viral diseases such as Thai sac brood
virus, bacterial diseases such as American Foulbrood and European
Foulbrood, protozoan diseases such as nosema diseases,amoebic disease,
septicaemia and fungal diseases such as chalkbrood are all frequently seen
diseases in honeybees (Amiri et al., 2017).
Socio Economy and Policy Studies (SEPS) 1(1) (2021) 36-38
Cite The Ar ticle:
Deepi ka Manand har, Di pak Khana l (2021) .
Beeke eping in Nepal and Its Status, Challe nges a nd Possibi lities: A Review.
Socio Economy and Policy
Studi es, 1(1 ): 36-38
.
With the advancement of agricultural modernity,the use of pesticides and
insecticides has been increased dramatically,affecting honey bee
populations directly. During pollination, honeybees ingest these harmful
pesticides and perish instantaneously. Another challenge in Nepalese
apiculture is the conservation of the wild honeybee due to increasing
deforestation. Apiculture also faces obstacles such as a lack of data on bee
floral identification and mapping of bee pastures with carrying capacity.
Poor beekeeper face a lack of government help(Aryal et al., 2015). The lack
of competent honeybee research has resulted in a reduction in beekeeping
in Nepal. Research on management of hives as well as training sessions are
still insufficient in our country. In Nepal,the lack of experienced labor and
the infrastructure required for beekeeping is posing additional obstacles
(Cobb, 2019)(Abou-Shaara, 2019).
6. POSSIBILITIES AND STRATEGIES
Aside from honey production,farmers are drawn to beekeeping because of
the additional money generated by by-products such as wax,pollen,royal
jelly and queen bees.Also beekeeping has a lot of prossibilities in Nepal
because of Nepal’s diverse flora and the fact that it is a low-
investment,high return enterprise(Bhandari & Kattel, 2020). If
government and international organisations conduct enough research and
provide adequate support,beekeeping in Nepal can develop to next
level.Nepalese beekeeping can thrive well through appropriate instruction
in beehive management and awareness of honeybee seasonal
managment.Trees for bees in planting programs to boost pollination and
raise crop yields,supporting honey hunters through beekeeping and
exporting honey wines or beeswax cosmetics all facilitate beekeepers in
Nepal better their livelihoods.(Abd Jalil et al., 2017)
7. CONCLUSION
To summarize,the review paper focuses on beekeeping in Nepal including
its cahllenges and opportunities.Nepal offers a lot of potential for
beekeeping because of its numerous ecological conditions.Increasing
honey production can help alleviate some of the pressure in food security
in a developing country like Nepal.Better administration,regular
inspection,quality floral availability,more research, and more experienced
workforce involvement can help to bring beekeeping to next
level.Hence,There is further scope for beekeepers to grow through the
development and popularization of modern beehives,streamlining
community based beekeeping and tackling numerous challenges for the
promotion of beekeeping in Nepal.
REFERENCES
Abd Jalil, M. A., Kasmuri, A. R., & Hadi, H. 2017. Stingless bee honey, the
natural wound healer: A Review. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology,
30(2), 6675. https://doi.org/10.1159/000458416
Abou-Shaara, H. F. 2019. Geographical information system for beekeeping
development. Journal of Apicultural Science, 63(1), 516.
https://doi.org/10.2478/JAS-2019-0015
Allen, M. F. 1995. Bees and beekeeping in Nepal. Bee World, 76(4), 185
194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.1995.11099269
Amiri, E., Strand, M. K., Rueppell, O., & Tarpy, D. R. 2017. Queen quality and
the impact of honey bee diseases on queen health: Potential for
interactions between two major threats to colony health. Insects, 8(2),
2226. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8020048
Aryal, S., Thapa, R., & Jung, C. 2015. An overview of Beekeeping Economy
and Its Constraints in Nepal An overview of Beekeeping Economy and
Its Constraints in Nepal. September.
https://doi.org/10.17519/apiculture.2015.09.30.3.135
Bhandari, P. L., & Kattel, R. R. 2020. Value Chain Analysis of Honey Sub-
sector in Nepal. International Journal of Applied Sciences and
Biotechnology, 8(1), 8395.
https://doi.org/10.3126/ijasbt.v8i1.27804
Bhusal, S. J., Kafle, L., Thapa, R. B., & Shih, C. J. 2011. Effect of colony
strength on the performance of honeybees (Apis mellifera) in Nepal
(Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sociobiology, 58(2), 435448.
Bista, S., & Shivakoti, G. P. 1970. Honeybee Flora at Kabre, Dolakha District.
Nepal Agriculture Research Journal, 4, 1825.
https://doi.org/10.3126/narj.v4i0.4859
Bista, S., Thapa, R. B., K.C., G. B., Pradhan, S. B., Ghimire, Y. N., & Aryal, S.
2020. Incidence and predation rate of hornet (Vespa spp.) on
European honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) apiary at mid-hill areas of
Lalitpur district, Nepal. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources,
3(1), 117132. https://doi.org/10.3126/janr.v3i1.27105
Cholis, M. N., Alpionita, R., Prawasti, T. S., & Atmowidi, T. 2020. Pollen Load
and Flower Constancy of Stingless Bees Tetragonula laeviceps (Smith)
and Heterotrigona itama (Cockerell) (Apidae: Meliponinae). 8 (Iccesi
2019), 285289. https://doi.org/10.2991/absr.k.200513.047
Cobb, A. 2019. Living with Bees : A Look into The Relationships Between
People and Native Bees in Western Nepal.
Gathering, H., Perichon, S., Bhatta, C., Perichon, S., & Bhatta, C. 2019. Honey
Gathering ( Apis laboriosa ) and Beekeeping ( A . cerana ) in the
Annapurna Conservation Area Nepal. Bee World, 0(0), 116.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.2019.1604298
Neupane, K. (2009). Honey bee mites and their population variance during
different seasons, Chitwan, Nepal. March.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260602392_Honey_bee_
mites_and_their_population_variance_during_different_seasons_Chit
wan_Nepal
Pfeffer, S., & Wolf, H. 2020. Arthropod spatial cognition. Animal Cognition,
23(6), 10411049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01446-4
Pokhrel, S. (n.d.). Beekeepers Need Awake up in Autumn to have Better
Harvest in Winter Honey Flow in Chitwan, Nepal.
Potts, S. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Kremen, C., Neumann, P., Schweiger, O., &
Kunin, W. E. 2010. Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and
drivers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25(6), 345353.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007
Publications, P. (n.d.). Project Publications Exploration of Genetic
Diversity in Himalayan Honeybee, Apis cerana.
... Bees are excellent pollinators. They preserve biological variety and the ecology (Manandhar and Khanal, 2021). They ensure efficient pollination and increase agricultural yield. ...
... Domestic honey has not been able to meet the honey demand of the country. Low honey production in Nepal can be attributed to several factors, including inadequate government assistance, a lack of infrastructure and skilled labor, limited research on hive management, and inadequate training programs (Manandhar and Khanal, 2021). Similarly, Nepalese honey cannot compete with international honey because there is no guarantee of quality production or certification (Bhattarai et al., 2020). ...
... Prior to this, native bees were only raised in traditional hives, and gathering honey from the wild was rather usual. Nevertheless, the Gurung tribe of Nepal engages in the perilous activity of gathering honey from cliffs, particularly that produced by A. dorsata (Manandhar and Khanal, 2021). This has the potential to grow as a tourism industry and a way to make foreign exchange. ...
Article
Full-text available
Beekeeping is a traditional practice in Nepal that has evolved to a profit-making industry over time. This review highlights the status of beekeeping and queen production in Nepal shedding lights on the journey of transformation of beekeeping practice from the very beginning to the present. Beekeeping is a source of income for rural communities and a vital component of sustainable agriculture as it enhances pollination and food security. It also highlights the immense potential of beekeeping in Nepal and suggests room to future developments with few human interventions like use of quality queen and good beekeeping practices. Ensuring a quality queen in a hive is crucial for maximum productivity and has emerged as strong hope for the boom of this sector in Nepal. There are several challenges including issues related to infrastructure, quality control and the knowledge gap among beekeepers. However, necessary steps have been taken by different government and non-government bodies relating to this sector and is slowing paving its way to becoming a strong sub-sector contributing to the national economy. The article suggests need for improved infrastructure, regular trainings, and awareness to bring beekeeping and queen rearing to its full potential. With the right support and guidance, these practices could not only boost the income of beekeepers but also contribute to the conservation of biodiversity and the growth of a sustainable beekeeping industry in the country.
Article
Full-text available
The feats of arthropods, and of the well-studied insects and crustaceans in particular, have fascinated scientists and laymen alike for centuries. Arthropods show a diverse repertoire of cognitive feats, of often unexpected sophistication. Despite their smaller brains and resulting lower neuronal capacity, the cognitive abilities of arthropods are comparable to, or may even exceed, those of vertebrates, depending on the species compared. Miniature brains often provide parsimonious but smart solutions for complex behaviours or ecologically relevant problems. This makes arthropods inspiring subjects for basic research, bionics, and robotics. Investigations of arthropod spatial cognition have originally concentrated on the honeybee, an animal domesticated for several thousand years. Bees are easy to keep and handle, making this species amenable to experimental study. However, there are an estimated 5–10 million arthropod species worldwide, with a broad diversity of lifestyles, ecology, and cognitive abilities. This high diversity provides ample opportunity for comparative analyses. Comparative study, rather than focusing on single model species, is well suited to scrutinise the link between ecological niche, lifestyle, and cognitive competence. It also allows the discovery of general concepts that are transferable between distantly related groups of organisms. With species diversity and a comparative approach in mind, this special issue compiles four review articles and ten original research reports from a spectrum of arthropod species. These contributions range from the well-studied hymenopterans, and ants in particular, to chelicerates and crustaceans. They thus present a broad spectrum of glimpses into current research on arthropod spatial cognition, and together they cogently emphasise the merits of research into arthropod cognitive achievements.
Article
Full-text available
Beekeeping is a low investment and low input business enterprise with immediate return. However, very few researches has been done on value chain analysis of honey sub-sector in Nepal. Such a backdrop, this research gauges the value chain of honey in Nepal focusing value chain function, actors/products flow and enabling business in 2018. Both primary and secondary information were collected using different research instruments in 2018. This study revealed that Apis cerana was the major honey-bee reared in Pyuthan district and about 50% youth were engaged in beekeeping business. Each household have an average of 32 hives ranging from 15 to 80 hives. Average 32 kg honey was consumed at HHs level and 239 kg was sold. The average wholesale rate of honey at farm gate was about NPR 400-450 (USD 3.6-4.1) per kg with the retail price rate was NPR 500 (USD 4.5). An average income earned from honey sale was NPR 60000 (USD 545) per annum ranging from NPR 20000 to 120000. Majority of the beekeepers received training whereas none of them have done insurance. About 55% of the beekeepers have taken loan from saving groups and cooperatives or MFIs. There has not any provision of grading, processing and labelling of the product at producer’s point in the study area. The main threats of beekeeping came from loss of habitat, disease, pest and enemies. This research suggests to develop upgrading practices with facilitation of basic value chain practices for promotion of high-quality Nepali honey at global markets. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol. Vol 8(1): 83-95
Article
Full-text available
Predatory hornets are considered as one of the major constraints to beekeeping industry. Therefore, its incidence and predation rate was studied throughout the year at two locations- rural and forest areas of mid-hill in Laliptur district during 2016/017 to 2017/018. Observation was made on the number of hornet and honey bee captured by hornet in three different times of the day for three continuous minutes every fortnightly on five honeybee colonies. During the study period, major hornet species captured around the honeybee apiary at both locations were, Vespa velutina Lepeletier, Vespa basalis Smith, Vespa tropica (Linnaeus) and Vespa mandarina Smith. The hornet incidence varied significantly between the years and locations along with different observation dates. Their incidence and predation rates were low in early spring and summer that gradually increased with the highest peak in October and November in both locations. The maximum predation was on mid-November (62.07%) and early-November (53.49%) at rural and forest locations, respectively during 2016/017. In 2017/018, the highest predation was on early-November (70.27%) at rural area while it was in mid-November (58.62%) in the apiaries near the forest area. The population of hornet was considerably higher at forest areas and their incidence around the honeybee apiaries were negatively correlated with rainfall. Hence, assessment of the temporal and spatial population variations and predation rates along with weather parameters is helpful in to develop sustainable management plans of the hornet in apiary.
Article
Full-text available
Geographical Information System (GIS) is a computer-based system that can perform analysis for various datasets in relation to specific geographical locations and has been widely applied in agriculture. So far, GIS has been used in relatively few studies related to honey bees and beekeeping, but this article aims to review those previously performed and to present trends to apply GIS in beekeeping and then to help and guide researchers to perform more studies utilizing it. GIS can clearly be utilized to select suitable locations for apiaries, to map bee plants, to study bee behavior, diseases and pests, and to predict the effects of climate change on honey bees beside other benefits for beekeeping. Many obstacles and problems facing beekeeping can be mapped and analyzed using GIS, and other techniques can be used with it to perform the required tasks as presented in this review.
Article
Full-text available
Western honey bees, Apis mellifera, live in highly eusocial colonies that are each typically headed by a single queen. The queen is the sole reproductive female in a healthy colony, and because long-term colony survival depends on her ability to produce a large number of offspring, queen health is essential for colony success. Honey bees have recently been experiencing considerable declines in colony health. Among a number of biotic and abiotic factors known to impact colony health, disease and queen failure are repeatedly reported as important factors underlying colony losses. Surprisingly, there are relatively few studies on the relationship and interaction between honey bee diseases and queen quality. It is critical to understand the negative impacts of pests and pathogens on queen health, how queen problems might enable disease, and how both factors influence colony health. Here, we review the current literature on queen reproductive potential and the impacts of honey bee parasites and pathogens on queens. We conclude by highlighting gaps in our knowledge on the combination of disease and queen failure to provide a perspective and prioritize further research to mitigate disease, improve queen quality, and ensure colony health
Article
Full-text available
Background: The stingless bee is a natural type of bee that exists in almost every continent. The honey produced by this bee has been widely used across time and space. The distinctive feature of this honey is that it is stored naturally in the pot (cerumen), thus contributing to its beneficial properties, especially in the wound healing process. Methods: In this article, several studies on stingless bee honey that pointed out the numerous therapeutic profiles of this honey in terms of its antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, as well as moisturizing properties are reviewed. All of these therapeutic properties are related to wound healing properties. Results: Antioxidant in stingless bee honey could break the chain of free radicals that cause a detrimental effect to the wounded area. Furthermore, the antimicrobial properties of stingless bee honey could overcome the bacterial contamination and thus improve the healing rate. Moreover, the anti-inflammatory attribute in this honey could protect the tissue from highly toxic inflammatory mediators. The moisturizing properties of the honey could improve wound healing by promoting angiogenesis and oxygen circulation. Conclusion: The application of honey to the wound has been widely used since ancient times. As a result, it is essential to understand the pharmacological mechanism of the honey towards the physiology of the wounded skin in order to optimize the healing rate in the future.
Article
Full-text available
Beekeeping has been in practice from an ancient time in Nepal. It is one of the high valued and income-generating activities for the people in Nepal. Diverse climatic conditions of Nepal harbor five species of honeybee out of which Apis laboriosa, A. dorsata, A. cerena, A. florae are native, whereas Apis mellifera was introduced and is being reared commercially. Three sub-species of A. cerana, viz. A. cerana indica, A. cerana Himalaya and A. cerana cerana are distributed in different regions of Nepal. A. cerena is cultivated in traditional log hive as well as in modern bee hive. However, most of the annual honey production comes from wild honeybees. Number of hives recorded during 2012/13 was 169,000 with 1625 metric tons of honey production. Hive productivity is low due to problems associated with apiculture; low quality management of bees, colony migration and absconding, pesticide intoxication, product quality control, inadequate data on bee floral identification and inadequate bee research program, are major concerns for beekeeping in Nepal. Though attempts have been made to address few issues such as pest and disease management, behavioral study of wild honey bees, pollination and floral diversity, but most of the problems are unattended because research on beekeeping is scattered and not well organized. Ample opportunities are available to promote apiculture for pollination and hive product. This paper reviews on honeybee diversity, honey production, problems in apiculture, and areas for future study in Nepal.
Article
Full-text available
The honey bee mites and their population variation in Apis species was studied during autumn, winter, spring, summer and rainy seasons of 2005 at Chitwan. Honey bee mite, Tropilaelaps clareae was observed in A. mellifera and A. dorsata colonies where as Varroa destructor (Anderson and Trueman) was observed in A. cerana and A. mellifera colonies. The incidence of mites and the level of colony infestation were dependent upon the species of honey bee. Both types of mite infested the brood, worker, drone and queen bees. The level of infestation of mites was higher in A. mellifera (78.0 %) than in A. cerana (70.0%) and A. dorsata (50.0%) bees. Population of T. clareae in colonies of A. mellifera and A. dorsata was the lowest in rainy (6.4 and 3.3 per sample, respectively), and the highest in winter and spring seasons (118.3 and 41.35 per sample, respectively). Number of V. destructor was also recorded the lowest in rainy (4.0 per sample), and the highest in spring (27.7 per sample) season for A. cerana colonies. The population of both kinds of mites began to multiply from autumn and reached at higher damaging level in winter season. Honey bee mite, Tropilaelaps clareae was identified as the major threat to A. mellifera and A. dorsata where as Varroa destructor was considered threat to A. cerana bees in Nepalese context.
Article
This review is based on a visit made by the author in March—April 1993 to the Bee Development Programme, Kathmandu, Nepal.