ArticlePublisher preview available

Foreign portfolio investment patterns: evidence from a gravity model

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Cross-country capital flows have been widely studied in the literature; however, why some countries may form more similar foreign investment portfolios than others has not been investigated. Using data for a broad panel of countries during the period 2002–2015, we adopt gravity equations to estimate cross-country foreign portfolio investment patterns. The main empirical results reveal that countries are more likely to form similar foreign portfolio investment patterns if: (i) countries are geographically closer; (ii) countries share the same official language; and (iii) countries adopt fixed exchange rate regimes.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Empirical Economics (2022) 63:391–415
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02133-0
Foreign portfolio investment patterns: evidence from a
gravity model
Lei Pan1·Rong Hu2·Qingyuan Du3
Received: 25 September 2020 / Accepted: 6 September 2021 / Published online: 20 September 2021
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021
Abstract
Cross-country capital flows have been widely studied in the literature; however, why
some countries may form more similar foreign investment portfolios than others has
not been investigated. Using data for a broad panel of countries during the period
2002–2015, we adopt gravity equations to estimate cross-country foreign portfolio
investment patterns. The main empirical results reveal that countries are more likely
to form similar foreign portfolio investment patterns if: (i) countries are geographically
closer; (ii) countries share the same official language; and (iii) countries adopt fixed
exchange rate regimes.
Keywords Foreign portfolio investment ·Gravity ·Exchange rate regimes
Mathematics Subject Classification F21 ·F31 ·F34
The authors thank Giovanni Caggiano, Russell Smyth, Vinod Mishra, Ben Li, Jian Lu, Silvio Contessi and
the seminar participants at Monash University for helpful comments. The authors are grateful to Joakim
Westerlund (editor-in-chief) and three insightful and constructive anonymous referees. This research is
part of Lei Pan’s PhD thesis at Monash University. The usual caveat applies.
BRong Hu
hurong@dufe.edu.cn
Lei Pan
lei.pan@curtin.edu.au
Qingyuan Du
qingyuan.du@monash.edu
1School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
2School of Economics, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025, Liaoning,
China
3Department of Economics, Monash University, 900 Dandenong Rd, Caulfield East, VIC 3145,
Australia
123
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... The linguist Greenberg [4] was among the first to propose a potential link between language and economics, suggesting the incorporation of linguistic distance as a diversity index into research frameworks that explore political, economic, geographical, historical, and other non-linguistic factors. This idea has been subsequently cited by various scholars, pivoting the focus toward the intricate relationship between language and economy, including international trade, migration, translational communication, commerce, foreign investment and financial transactions [1][2][3][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Common language, serving as a conduit for communication, plays a pivotal role in social science research, particularly in the field of international economics, which is already enriched by a plethora of theoretical studies [12][13][14][15]. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates the impact of a minority language on international trade. Using the distance to Hunchun as an instrumental variable, and transaction-level customs data from 2000 to 2015, we investigate the causal impact of common Korean language on international trade between Chinese counties and South/North Korea. The results suggest that a 1% increase in the proportion of population speaking Korean will increase value share and transactions share in trade by 1.8% and 2.3%, respectively. These effects are more pronounced in trade with North Korea and in higher trade share regions. Furthermore, we show that the common Korean language exerts its influence through reducing communication barrier. The impact is mainly observed at the extensive margin rather than the intensive margin. These findings highlight the potential of leveraging minority languages to boost bilateral trade in developing countries.
... In this study, the same variables was used with different model. Pan et al. (2022), in their studies; examined the foreign portfolio investment patterns. They used the gravity model. ...
Article
Yatırım araçları gerek firma boyutunda ve gerekse ülke ekonomilerinin finansal istikrarı açısından önemlidir. Bunun yanında enflasyon da firmaların üretim maliyetleri ile satış fiyatları açısından ve ülkenin ekonomik istikrarı yönünden büyük önem taşımaktadır. Buna ilaveten enflasyonist ortamlarda bireylerin satın alma güçlerini korumada yatırım araçlarından elde edilecek olan getirilerin büyüklüğü ciddi önem taşımaktadır. Türkiye’de yatırımcılarının finansal piyasalarda yapmış oldukları seçilmiş portföy yatırım araçlarının aralarındaki ilişkinin enflasyon çerçevesinde incelendiği bu çalışmada 2015-2021 arası dönemde aylık veriler kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada söz konusu yatırım araçlarının endeks getirileriyle birlikte TÜFE verileri kullanılarak VAR modeli ile analiz yapılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, tüm değişkenler arasında VAR modelinin istikrarlılık koşulu sağlanmıştır. Bireysel Emeklilik Sistemi fonları, altın ve döviz getirilerinin enflasyonun tek yönlü nedeni olduğu, altın ve döviz getirileri ile enflasyonun, mevduat getirisinin tek yönlü nedeni olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca BES getirisinin tüm yatırım araçlarının değişimi üzerinde etkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bunun yanında döviz getirisinin, enflasyon ve mevduat getirisindeki değişmeleri açıklamada etkili olduğu bulunmuştur. Son olarak da enflasyonun, mevduat ve döviz getirisi değişmeleri üzerinde etkili olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
Article
Full-text available
We apply insights from international business on the measurement and effects of culture to generalise existing gravity models of foreign portfolio investment (FPI). We apply our models to explain cross-border holdings of debt and equity FPI using the IMF's CPIS survey for 174 originating and 50 destination countries, and using both panel and annual estimates for 2001-2004. We find that culture and cultural distance operate alongside geographical distance in determining global FPI patterns, and we find strong hitherto unreported cultural effects. Amongst our findings are the following. First , cultural distance is a significant deterrent to FPI, with a coefficient one third the size of geographic distance. In this respect, gravity looks like a cultural artefact. Second neither common language nor common religion is associated with greater FPI. Third , analogously to geographical and cultural distance, Hofstede's power distance in the originating country is negatively related to cross-border debt and equity holdings. Fourth , uncertainty avoidance is positively related to cross-border debt holdings. Fifth, both masculinity and individuality are positively related to cross-border debt and equity FPI. The last three effects imply that gravity is not a cultural artefact, because these components of culture act to promote rather than to deter FPI. Overall, our paper points to the importance of clearly separating the measurement and effects of gravity and culture - gravity always deters trade, but aspects of culture can encourage trade.
Article
Countries' gross capital inflows are not equally affected by changes in global conditions. Analyzing 21 advanced countries (ACs)and 33 emerging markets (EMs)between 2001 and 2015, we confirm that co-movements in capital inflows are concentrated in bank, portfolio bond, and portfolio equity flows to EMs. However, changes in global factors do not affect all EMs equally, even for the same type of flow. Investigating the characteristics of these sensitivities, we find that EMs relying more on global mutual funds are more sensitive in their gross equity and bond inflows. Recipient market liquidity and inclusion in global market indices also increase sensitivities, but we find little robust evidence that institutional and macroeconomic fundamentals dampen sensitivities.
Article
Is the stock market boom a result of the baby boom? This paper develops an overlapping generations model in which a baby boom is modeled as a high realization of a random birth rate, and the price of capital is determined endogenously by a convex cost of adjustment. A baby boom increases national saving and investment and thus causes an increase in the price of capital. The price of capital is mean-reverting so the initial increase in the price of capital is followed by a decrease. Social Security can potentially affect national saving and investment, though in the long run, it does not affect the price of capital.
Article
Understanding what drives international portfolio flows has important policy implications for countries wishing to exert some control on the size, direction and volatility of the flows. This paper empirically assesses the relative contribution of common (push) and country-specific (pull) factors to the variation of bond and equity flows from the US to 55 other countries. Using a Bayesian dynamic latent factor model, we find that more than 80% of the variation in bond and equity flows is due to push factors from the US to other countries. Hence global economic forces seem to prevail over domestic economic forces in explaining movements in international portfolio flows. The dynamics of push and pull factors can be partially explained by US and foreign economic fundamentals.
Article
This paper analyzes the drivers of international waves in capital flows. We build on the literature on "sudden stops" and "bonanzas" to develop a new methodology for identifying episodes of extreme capital flow movements using quarterly data on gross inflows and gross outflows, differentiating activity by foreigners and domestics. We identify episodes of "surge", "stop", "flight" and "retrenchment" and show how our approach yields fundamentally different results than the previous literature that used measures of net flows. Global factors, especially global risk, are important determinants of these episodes. Contagion, especially through the bilateral exposure of banking systems, is important in determining stop and retrenchment episodes. Domestic macroeconomic characteristics are generally less important, although changes in domestic economic growth influence episodes caused by foreigners. We find little role for global interest rates and global liquidity in explaining surges in foreign capital flows (independent of global risk and global growth). We also find little role for capital controls in reducing capital flow waves. The results help discern between different theoretical approaches explaining crises and capital flow volatility.