ArticlePublisher preview available

Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Agriculture and land use are major sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions but previous estimates were either highly aggregate or provided spatial details for subsectors obtained via different methodologies. Using a model–data integration approach that ensures full consistency between subsectors, we provide spatially explicit estimates of production- and consumption-based GHG emissions worldwide from plant- and animal-based human food in circa 2010. Global GHG emissions from the production of food were found to be 17,318 ± 1,675 TgCO2eq yr−1, of which 57% corresponds to the production of animal-based food (including livestock feed), 29% to plant-based foods and 14% to other utilizations. Farmland management and land-use change represented major shares of total emissions (38% and 29%, respectively), whereas rice and beef were the largest contributing plant- and animal-based commodities (12% and 25%, respectively), and South and Southeast Asia and South America were the largest emitters of production-based GHGs. The quantification of greenhouse gas emissions related to food production and consumption is still largely hindered by the availability of spatial data consistent across sectors. This study provides a detailed account of emissions from land-use change, farmland, livestock and activities beyond the farm gate associated with plant- and animal-based foods/diets—culminating in local-, country- and global-level emissions from each major agricultural commodity.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Articles
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x
1University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA. 2Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 3Statistics
Division, FAO, Rome, Italy. 4Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
5PlantPure Communities, Inc., Mebane, NC, USA. e-mail: jain1@illinois.edu
The global population has quadrupled over the last century.
Demographic growth and associated economic growth have
increased global food demand and caused dietary changes,
such as eating more animal-based products. The United Nations
projects that food production from plants and animals will need to
increase 70% by 2050, compared to 2009, to meet increasing food
demand1. This will drive the expansion of food subsectors, includ-
ing crop cultivation and livestock production, as well as product
transportation and processing, materials (fertilizer and pesticides)
and irrigation2. Increased food production may accelerate land-use
changes (LUCs) for agriculture, resulting in greater greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions, reduced carbon sequestration and further cli-
mate change. Developing climate mitigation strategies will require
estimates of all major GHG emissions (for example, CO2, CH4 and
N2O) from the production and consumption of total and individ-
ual plant- and animal-based food from all food-related subsectors,
such as land-use change and farmland activities, at local, regional
and global scales—which is the overall objective of this study. Such
comprehensive and quantitative estimates require a framework
that dynamically represents the environmental, management and
human drivers of major GHGs while satisfying carbon and nitrogen
mass-conservation among plant and livestock production and con-
sumption systems.
Previous efforts have been made to assess GHG emissions from
agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU)3,4, a critical subset
of food systems emissions57. The recent Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Climate Change and
Land (SRCCL)6 and subsequent work7 quantified emissions within
and beyond the farm gate, the latter referring to emissions caused
by food systems that are not covered by AFOLU sectors, such as fer-
tilizer manufacturing, product processing and transportation (Fig.
1), to be in the range of 10,800–19,100 TgCO2eq yr1 for the decade
2008–2017. These estimates combined results from diverse stud-
ies on farm-gate agriculture and associated land use4 with global
estimates of emissions along the supply chain up to retail and con-
sumption, each study using a different methodology. The annual
assessment of the global carbon budget provides C O2-only emissions
from LUC8. In contrast, the Food and Agriculture Organization
(FAO) gives CO2 emissions from forest LUC and peatland degra-
dation9, but those studies do not cover emissions from changes in
agricultural management intensity8. Moreover, CH4 and N2O emis-
sions from agricultural activities are provided globally by different
datasets10,11, usually based on estimation approaches defined by the
IPCC Guidelines12. The IPCC AR5 WG33 and FAOSTAT4 quanti-
fied regional GHG emissions from subsectors of agriculture and
land use. There are also studies focusing on spatially explicit GHG
emissions for selected crops13, emissions of the life cycle of agri-
cultural production5, such as the FAO GLEAM model to estimate
global livestock emissions for 200514, and accounting for carbon
opportunity costs of agricultural land15.
This study quantifies CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions from the
production and consumption of all plant- and animal-based foods
on a grid scale using a consistent unified model–data integration
framework. Our approach builds upon and extends the data and
methods published in the literature by implementing them into the
Integrated Science Assessment Model (ISAM)16.
Our approach advances the field for three main reasons. First,
we have a dynamic representation of environmental drivers, such
as climate, CO2 and of direct human drivers (LUC) using a consis-
tent set of mass-conserving equations and parameters for biophysi-
cal and biogeochemical processes to estimate the plant carbon and
nitrogen dynamics. In comparison, inventory-based methods, such
as those used by the IPCC12, usually consider environmental fac-
tors as static functions12. Second, we estimate CO2 emissions and
Global greenhouse gas emissions from
animal-based foods are twice those of
plant-based foods
Xiaoming Xu 1, Prateek Sharma1, Shijie Shu 1, Tzu-Shun Lin1, Philippe Ciais 2,
Francesco N. Tubiello 3, Pete Smith 4, Nelson Campbell5 and Atul K. Jain 1 ✉
Agriculture and land use are major sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions but previous estimates were either highly
aggregate or provided spatial details for subsectors obtained via different methodologies. Using a model–data integra-
tion approach that ensures full consistency between subsectors, we provide spatially explicit estimates of production- and
consumption-based GHG emissions worldwide from plant- and animal-based human food in circa 2010. Global GHG emis-
sions from the production of food were found to be 17,318 ± 1,675 TgCO2eq yr1, of which 57% corresponds to the production of
animal-based food (including livestock feed), 29% to plant-based foods and 14% to other utilizations. Farmland management
and land-use change represented major shares of total emissions (38% and 29%, respectively), whereas rice and beef were
the largest contributing plant- and animal-based commodities (12% and 25%, respectively), and South and Southeast Asia and
South America were the largest emitters of production-based GHGs.
NATURE FOOD | VOL 2 | SEPTEMBER 2021 | 724–732 | www.nature.com/natfood
724
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
... A significant proportion of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agriculture are caused by livestock in the form of methane and nitrous oxide resulting from enteric fermentation and feed production [1,2], exceeding those of plant-based counterparts [3][4][5]. Given the urgency of addressing this environmental concern, a life cycle assessment (LCA) is the main tool used to assess the environmental footprint of livestock production [6]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The understanding of sustainability is shifting from that of a purely environmental dimension to one that includes social concerns. Combined with the growing customer interest in livestock husbandry practices, this study investigates the assessment of animal welfare as a socially influenced impact category for the life cycle assessment (LCA) of pig farming. The weighting of animal welfare impacts is based on a quantitative approach using a set of indicators derived from an expert survey using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The aim is to develop an easy-to-implement score that translates the characteristics of several animal welfare indicators into a comparable value. To demonstrate the feasibility of the weighting part of the framework, a case study is conducted with nine experts in the fields of animal husbandry, agricultural sciences, and veterinary medicine. The case study results show that the main criteria of single animal observation and feed intake are the most relevant factors, at 30.6%, followed by operation-specific parameters at 23.9% and husbandry conditions at 14.9%. This case study highlights that animal losses (13.9%) significantly influence the impact category, while access to outdoor areas (1.4%) is less important. The overall conclusion is that an animal health-centered approach is preferable when assessing animal welfare.
... Fertilization strategies significantly reduce abiotic stress impacts by promoting plant development, structure, biochemical processes, and nutrients stores, enabling plants to tolerate hostile ecological circumstances (Xu et al., 2021). Within vital group of macronutrients, K assumes a predominantly pivotal part in affecting growth and development of plant, whether in typical or challenging environmental conditions. ...
Article
Full-text available
Potassium (K) mitigates the effect of high temperature on canola, especially during its later growth stages when sowing of canola is delayed. To explore the effect of K on high temperature tolerance and canola production, a field experiment (2019-2021) was conducted. The experiment had two sowing dates (October 15 and November 1) and four K treatments, i.e. control, soil application (50 kg K ha-1), soil application+0.25% K foliar spray at pre-and post-flowering stages, and soil application+0.50% K foliar spray at pre and post-flowering stages. Application of 50 kg K ha-1 as soil application along with 0.50% K-foliar sprays resulted in higher production of biochemicals (superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and total soluble sugars) besides net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance along with less malondialdehyde production and relative cell injury in crops sown on November 1 st than untreated plants. Moreover, it also enhanced chlorophyll florescence and chlorophyll (a and b) contents of late-sown crop. Plants sown on November 1 st and received 50 kg K ha-1 as soil application along with 0.50% K foliar spray also gave a higher yield and economic returns than the control. Therefore, it is suggested to supply 50 kg K ha-1 at sowing and a foliar spray of 0.50% K at the pre-and post-flowering stages to canola sown late in the season to achieve optimal and economical yield levels.
... Fertilization strategies significantly reduce abiotic stress impacts by promoting plant development, structure, biochemical processes, and nutrients stores, enabling plants to tolerate hostile ecological circumstances (Xu et al., 2021). Within vital group of macronutrients, K assumes a predominantly pivotal part in affecting growth and development of plant, whether in typical or challenging environmental conditions. ...
Article
Full-text available
Grassland ecosystems plays a crucial role as carbon sinks, presenting opportunities for climate-smart land use and agriculture. Through the implementation of sustainable management practices, these ecosystems can enhance carbon sequestration, mitigate climate change, and bolster agricultural productivity. Nevertheless, challenges such as land degradation, overgrazing, and climate variability must be addressed to fully realize the potential of grasslands as carbon sinks. This review elucidates the role of grassland ecosystems in the global carbon cycle, emphasizing their capacity to sequester carbon and mitigate climate change. It explores strategies such as agro-silvo pastoralism, which integrates trees, livestock, and crops, and integrated crop-livestock systems, which optimize resource use and carbon storage. The review aims to provide insights into sustainable land use practices for climate change mitigation and ecosystem health. Despite ongoing research, uncertainties persist regarding the impact of land
Article
The food industry uses visual sensory attributes of the products to communicate with consumers, both in physical locations and online platforms. Recent technological advancements, particularly interactive digital interfaces, have made visual cues even more influential in food marketing. This study evaluates the synergistic effects of different menu formats and visual sensory cues in shifting consumer preferences toward sustainable food options, addressing the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A traditional Turkish rice pudding was used as a case study. Four sample variants with varying visual textural complexities were prepared by halving the standard portion size and layering it gradually with soft, crispy, crunchy, and airy foods. Using Blender software, two sets of 3D visuals—non‐informative (photographs only) and informative (photographs with product information)—were created for control and four variants and placed side by side. These visuals were then transferred to three different menu formats: paper, 2D touch screen, and 3D touch screen. A total of 180 participants evaluated the visuals via the assigned menu formats. Multivariate ANOVA was used to analyze the results. Participants consistently preferred the variant with three textural layers (soft, crispy, and crunchy) over the traditional dessert, regardless of menu formats and experimental conditions ( p > 0.05), leading to a reduction in carbon emissions by over 30%. The 2D touch screen slightly increased preference rates and reduced variability compared to other formats. This supports the Variety‐Seeking Behavior Theory, Elaboration Likelihood Model, and Cognitive Load Theory, suggesting that this format imposes optimal cognitive load and is the most engaging.
Article
Full-text available
Understanding and quantifying the global methane (CH4) budget is important for assessing realistic pathways to mitigate climate change. CH4 is the second most important human-influenced greenhouse gas in terms of climate forcing after carbon dioxide (CO2), and both emissions and atmospheric concentrations of CH4 have continued to increase since 2007 after a temporary pause. The relative importance of CH4 emissions compared to those of CO2 for temperature change is related to its shorter atmospheric lifetime, stronger radiative effect, and acceleration in atmospheric growth rate over the past decade, the causes of which are still debated. Two major challenges in quantifying the factors responsible for the observed atmospheric growth rate arise from diverse, geographically overlapping CH4 sources and from the uncertain magnitude and temporal change in the destruction of CH4 by short-lived and highly variable hydroxyl radicals (OH). To address these challenges, we have established a consortium of multidisciplinary scientists under the umbrella of the Global Carbon Project to improve, synthesise, and update the global CH4 budget regularly and to stimulate new research on the methane cycle. Following Saunois et al. (2016, 2020), we present here the third version of the living review paper dedicated to the decadal CH4 budget, integrating results of top-down CH4 emission estimates (based on in situ and Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations and an ensemble of atmospheric inverse-model results) and bottom-up estimates (based on process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry, inventories of anthropogenic emissions, and data-driven extrapolations). We present a budget for the most recent 2010–2019 calendar decade (the latest period for which full data sets are available), for the previous decade of 2000–2009 and for the year 2020. The revision of the bottom-up budget in this 2025 edition benefits from important progress in estimating inland freshwater emissions, with better counting of emissions from lakes and ponds, reservoirs, and streams and rivers. This budget also reduces double counting across freshwater and wetland emissions and, for the first time, includes an estimate of the potential double counting that may exist (average of 23 Tg CH4 yr⁻¹). Bottom-up approaches show that the combined wetland and inland freshwater emissions average 248 [159–369] Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ for the 2010–2019 decade. Natural fluxes are perturbed by human activities through climate, eutrophication, and land use. In this budget, we also estimate, for the first time, this anthropogenic component contributing to wetland and inland freshwater emissions. Newly available gridded products also allowed us to derive an almost complete latitudinal and regional budget based on bottom-up approaches. For the 2010–2019 decade, global CH4 emissions are estimated by atmospheric inversions (top-down) to be 575 Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ (range 553–586, corresponding to the minimum and maximum estimates of the model ensemble). Of this amount, 369 Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ or ∼ 65 % is attributed to direct anthropogenic sources in the fossil, agriculture, and waste and anthropogenic biomass burning (range 350–391 Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ or 63 %–68 %). For the 2000–2009 period, the atmospheric inversions give a slightly lower total emission than for 2010–2019, by 32 Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ (range 9–40). The 2020 emission rate is the highest of the period and reaches 608 Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ (range 581–627), which is 12 % higher than the average emissions in the 2000s. Since 2012, global direct anthropogenic CH4 emission trends have been tracking scenarios that assume no or minimal climate mitigation policies proposed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (shared socio-economic pathways SSP5 and SSP3). Bottom-up methods suggest 16 % (94 Tg CH4 yr⁻¹) larger global emissions (669 Tg CH4 yr⁻¹, range 512–849) than top-down inversion methods for the 2010–2019 period. The discrepancy between the bottom-up and the top-down budgets has been greatly reduced compared to the previous differences (167 and 156 Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ in Saunois et al. (2016, 2020) respectively), and for the first time uncertainties in bottom-up and top-down budgets overlap. Although differences have been reduced between inversions and bottom-up, the most important source of uncertainty in the global CH4 budget is still attributable to natural emissions, especially those from wetlands and inland freshwaters. The tropospheric loss of methane, as the main contributor to methane lifetime, has been estimated at 563 [510–663] Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ based on chemistry–climate models. These values are slightly larger than for 2000–2009 due to the impact of the rise in atmospheric methane and remaining large uncertainty (∼ 25 %). The total sink of CH4 is estimated at 633 [507–796] Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ by the bottom-up approaches and at 554 [550–567] Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ by top-down approaches. However, most of the top-down models use the same OH distribution, which introduces less uncertainty to the global budget than is likely justified. For 2010–2019, agriculture and waste contributed an estimated 228 [213–242] Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ in the top-down budget and 211 [195–231] Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ in the bottom-up budget. Fossil fuel emissions contributed 115 [100–124] Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ in the top-down budget and 120 [117–125] Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ in the bottom-up budget. Biomass and biofuel burning contributed 27 [26–27] Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ in the top-down budget and 28 [21–39] Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ in the bottom-up budget. We identify five major priorities for improving the CH4 budget: (i) producing a global, high-resolution map of water-saturated soils and inundated areas emitting CH4 based on a robust classification of different types of emitting ecosystems; (ii) further development of process-based models for inland-water emissions; (iii) intensification of CH4 observations at local (e.g. FLUXNET-CH4 measurements, urban-scale monitoring, satellite imagery with pointing capabilities) to regional scales (surface networks and global remote sensing measurements from satellites) to constrain both bottom-up models and atmospheric inversions; (iv) improvements of transport models and the representation of photochemical sinks in top-down inversions; and (v) integration of 3D variational inversion systems using isotopic and/or co-emitted species such as ethane as well as information in the bottom-up inventories on anthropogenic super-emitters detected by remote sensing (mainly oil and gas sector but also coal, agriculture, and landfills) to improve source partitioning. The data presented here can be downloaded from 10.18160/GKQ9-2RHT (Martinez et al., 2024).
Article
Full-text available
Human land use activities have resulted in large changes to the biogeochemical and biophysical properties of the Earth's surface, with consequences for climate and other ecosystem services. In the future, land use activities are likely to expand and/or intensify further to meet growing demands for food, fiber, and energy. As part of the World Climate Research Program Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6), the international community has developed the next generation of advanced Earth system models (ESMs) to estimate the combined effects of human activities (e.g., land use and fossil fuel emissions) on the carbon–climate system. A new set of historical data based on the History of the Global Environment database (HYDE), and multiple alternative scenarios of the future (2015–2100) from Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) teams, is required as input for these models. With most ESM simulations for CMIP6 now completed, it is important to document the land use patterns used by those simulations. Here we present results from the Land-Use Harmonization 2 (LUH2) project, which smoothly connects updated historical reconstructions of land use with eight new future projections in the format required for ESMs. The harmonization strategy estimates the fractional land use patterns, underlying land use transitions, key agricultural management information, and resulting secondary lands annually, while minimizing the differences between the end of the historical reconstruction and IAM initial conditions and preserving changes depicted by the IAMs in the future. The new approach builds on a similar effort from CMIP5 and is now provided at higher resolution (0.25∘×0.25∘) over a longer time domain (850–2100, with extensions to 2300) with more detail (including multiple crop and pasture types and associated management practices) using more input datasets (including Landsat remote sensing data) and updated algorithms (wood harvest and shifting cultivation); it is assessed via a new diagnostic package. The new LUH2 products contain > 50 times the information content of the datasets used in CMIP5 and are designed to enable new and improved estimates of the combined effects of land use on the global carbon–climate system.
Article
Full-text available
Understanding and quantifying the global methane (CH4) budget is important for assessing realistic pathways to mitigate climate change. Atmospheric emissions and concentrations of CH4 continue to increase, making CH4 the second most important human-influenced greenhouse gas in terms of climate forcing, after carbon dioxide (CO2). The relative importance of CH4 compared to CO2 depends on its shorter atmospheric lifetime, stronger warming potential, and variations in atmospheric growth rate over the past decade, the causes of which are still debated. Two major challenges in reducing uncertainties in the atmospheric growth rate arise from the variety of geographically overlapping CH4 sources and from the destruction of CH4 by short-lived hydroxyl radicals (OH). To address these challenges, we have established a consortium of multidisciplinary scientists under the umbrella of the Global Carbon Project to synthesize and stimulate new research aimed at improving and regularly updating the global methane budget. Following Saunois et al. (2016), we present here the second version of the living review paper dedicated to the decadal methane budget, integrating results of top-down studies (atmospheric observations within an atmospheric inverse-modelling framework) and bottom-up estimates (including process-based models for estimating land surface emissions and atmospheric chemistry, inventories of anthropogenic emissions, and data-driven extrapolations). For the 2008–2017 decade, global methane emissions are estimated by atmospheric inversions (a top-down approach) to be 576 Tg CH4 yr-1 (range 550–594, corresponding to the minimum and maximum estimates of the model ensemble). Of this total, 359 Tg CH4 yr-1 or ∼ 60 % is attributed to anthropogenic sources, that is emissions caused by direct human activity (i.e. anthropogenic emissions; range 336–376 Tg CH4 yr-1 or 50 %–65 %). The mean annual total emission for the new decade (2008–2017) is 29 Tg CH4 yr-1 larger than our estimate for the previous decade (2000–2009), and 24 Tg CH4 yr-1 larger than the one reported in the previous budget for 2003–2012 (Saunois et al., 2016). Since 2012, global CH4 emissions have been tracking the warmest scenarios assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Bottom-up methods suggest almost 30 % larger global emissions (737 Tg CH4 yr-1, range 594–881) than top-down inversion methods. Indeed, bottom-up estimates for natural sources such as natural wetlands, other inland water systems, and geological sources are higher than top-down estimates. The atmospheric constraints on the top-down budget suggest that at least some of these bottom-up emissions are overestimated. The latitudinal distribution of atmospheric observation-based emissions indicates a predominance of tropical emissions (∼ 65 % of the global budget, < 30∘ N) compared to mid-latitudes (∼ 30 %, 30–60∘ N) and high northern latitudes (∼ 4 %, 60–90∘ N). The most important source of uncertainty in the methane budget is attributable to natural emissions, especially those from wetlands and other inland waters. Some of our global source estimates are smaller than those in previously published budgets (Saunois et al., 2016; Kirschke et al., 2013). In particular wetland emissions are about 35 Tg CH4 yr-1 lower due to improved partition wetlands and other inland waters. Emissions from geological sources and wild animals are also found to be smaller by 7 Tg CH4 yr-1 by 8 Tg CH4 yr-1, respectively. However, the overall discrepancy between bottom-up and top-down estimates has been reduced by only 5 % compared to Saunois et al. (2016), due to a higher estimate of emissions from inland waters, highlighting the need for more detailed research on emissions factors. Priorities for improving the methane budget include (i) a global, high-resolution map of water-saturated soils and inundated areas emitting methane based on a robust classification of different types of emitting habitats; (ii) further development of process-based models for inland-water emissions; (iii) intensification of methane observations at local scales (e.g., FLUXNET-CH4 measurements) and urban-scale monitoring to constrain bottom-up land surface models, and at regional scales (surface networks and satellites) to constrain atmospheric inversions; (iv) improvements of transport models and the representation of photochemical sinks in top-down inversions; and (v) development of a 3D variational inversion system using isotopic and/or co-emitted species such as ethane to improve source partitioning. The data presented here can be downloaded from 10.18160/GCP-CH4-2019 (Saunois et al., 2020) and from the Global Carbon Project.
Article
Full-text available
We estimated the distribution of CH4 emissions and sinks from wetlands (including freshwater and coastal wetlands) and nonwetland (including wet and dry soils) with a newly developed vertically resolved soil CH4 model, integrated into a global land surface model (ISAM). We calibrated and tested this integrated model with CH4 observations at test sites in the Contiguous United States (CONUS). ISAM is applied across the CONUS to estimate CH4 emissions and sinks given both recent past observed climate and wetland extent, and future climate and wetland extent driven by two scenarios, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5. Estimated net CH4 emissions for the 2000s are 13.8 TgCH4 yr⁻¹, mostly from wetland soils. Estimated net emissions under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 are 30% and 64% higher, respectively, in the 2090s than in the 2000s due to (1) higher temperature and seasonal wetland extent (driven by higher precipitation in the climate scenarios), which increase modeled methanogenic activity more than methanotrophic activity in soils and (2) altered transport in the soil column and exchange with the atmosphere by modeled transport processes (diffusion, ebullition, and aerenchyma transport). Nonwetland soils emit CH4 (1.4 TgCH4 yr⁻¹) in some areas and take up CH4 (−2.9 TgCH4 yr⁻¹) in other areas, resulting in a net estimated sink for the 2000s; the net nonwetland soil sink increases by 15% and 46% by the 2090s under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, respectively, mainly due to drier soil conditions, which enhances methanotrophic activity and oxidation of CH4 diffused into soil from a future atmosphere with higher CH4 concentration.
Article
Full-text available
A food system framework breaks down entrenched sectoral categories and existing adaptation and mitigation silos, presenting novel ways of assessing and enabling integrated climate change solutions from production to consumption.
Article
Full-text available
Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the “global carbon budget” – is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFF) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly and its growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) and terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) are estimated with global process models constrained by observations. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the last decade available (2009–2018), EFF was 9.5±0.5 GtC yr-1, ELUC1.5±0.7 GtC yr-1, GATM4.9±0.02 GtC yr-1 (2.3±0.01 ppm yr-1), SOCEAN2.5±0.6 GtC yr-1, and SLAND3.2±0.6 GtC yr-1, with a budget imbalance BIM of 0.4 GtC yr-1 indicating overestimated emissions and/or underestimated sinks. For the year 2018 alone, the growth in EFF was about 2.1 % and fossil emissions increased to 10.0±0.5 GtC yr-1, reaching 10 GtC yr-1 for the first time in history, ELUC was 1.5±0.7 GtC yr-1, for total anthropogenic CO2 emissions of 11.5±0.9 GtC yr-1 (42.5±3.3 GtCO2). Also for 2018, GATM was 5.1±0.2 GtC yr-1 (2.4±0.1 ppm yr-1), SOCEAN was 2.6±0.6 GtC yr-1, and SLAND was 3.5±0.7 GtC yr-1, with a BIM of 0.3 GtC. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration reached 407.38±0.1 ppm averaged over 2018. For 2019, preliminary data for the first 6–10 months indicate a reduced growth in EFF of +0.6 % (range of -0.2 % to 1.5 %) based on national emissions projections for China, the USA, the EU, and India and projections of gross domestic product corrected for recent changes in the carbon intensity of the economy for the rest of the world. Overall, the mean and trend in the five components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959–2018, but discrepancies of up to 1 GtC yr-1 persist for the representation of semi-decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. A detailed comparison among individual estimates and the introduction of a broad range of observations shows (1) no consensus in the mean and trend in land use change emissions over the last decade, (2) a persistent low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern extra-tropics, and (3) an apparent underestimation of the CO2 variability by ocean models outside the tropics. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this data set (Le Quéré et al., 2018a, b, 2016, 2015a, b, 2014, 2013). The data generated by this work are available at 10.18160/gcp-2019 (Friedlingstein et al., 2019).
Article
Full-text available
The Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) compiles anthropogenic emissions data for greenhouse gases (GHGs), and for multiple air pollutants, based on international statistics and emission factors. EDGAR data provide quantitative support for atmospheric modelling and for mitigation scenario and impact assessment analyses as well as for policy evaluation. The new version (v4.3.2) of the EDGAR emission inventory provides global estimates, broken down to IPCC-relevant source-sector levels, from 1970 (the year of the European Union's first Air Quality Directive) to 2012 (the end year of the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, KP). Strengths of EDGAR v4.3.2 include global geo-coverage (226 countries), continuity in time, and comprehensiveness in activities. Emissions of multiple chemical compounds, GHGs as well as air pollutants, from relevant sources (fossil fuel activities but also, for example, fermentation processes in agricultural activities) are compiled following a bottom-up (BU), transparent and IPCC-compliant methodology. This paper describes EDGAR v4.3.2 developments with respect to three major long-lived GHGs (CO2, CH4, and N2O) derived from a wide range of human activities apart from the land-use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) sector and apart from savannah burning; a companion paper quantifies and discusses emissions of air pollutants. Detailed information is included for each of the IPCC-relevant source sectors, leading to global totals for 2010 (in the middle of the first KP commitment period) (with a 95 % confidence interval in parentheses): 33.6(±5.9) Pg CO2 yr-1, 0.34(±0.16) Pg CH4 yr-1, and 7.2(±3.7) Tg N2O yr-1. We provide uncertainty factors in emissions data for the different GHGs and for three different groups of countries: OECD countries of 1990, countries with economies in transition in 1990, and the remaining countries in development (the UNFCCC non-Annex I parties). We document trends for the major emitting countries together with the European Union in more detail, demonstrating that effects of fuel markets and financial instability have had greater impacts on GHG trends than effects of income or population. These data (10.5281/zenodo.2658138, Janssens-Maenhout et al., 2019) are visualised with annual and monthly global emissions grid maps of 0.1∘×0.1∘ for each source sector.
Article
Full-text available
Production and application to soils of manure excreta from livestock farming significantly perturb the global nutrient balance and result in significant greenhouse gas emissions that warm the earth's climate. Despite much attention paid to synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizer and manure N applications to croplands, spatially explicit, continuous time-series datasets of manure and fertilizer N inputs on pastures and rangelands are lacking. We developed three global gridded datasets at a resolution of 0.5∘ × 0.5∘ for the period 1860–2016 (i.e., annual manure N deposition (by grazing animals) rate, synthetic N fertilizer and N manure application rates), by combining annual and 5 arcmin spatial data on pastures and rangelands with country-level statistics on livestock manure, mineral and chemical fertilizers, and land use information for cropland and permanent meadows and pastures. Based on the new data products, we estimated that total N inputs, the sum of manure N deposition, manure N application and fertilizer N application to pastures and rangelands, increased globally from 15 to 101 Tg N yr-1 during 1860–2016. In particular during the period 2000–2016, livestock manure N deposition accounted for 83 % of the total N inputs, whereas manure and fertilizer N application accounted 9 % and 8 %, respectively. At the regional scale, hotspots of manure N deposition remained largely similar during the period 1860–2016 (i.e., southern Asia, Africa and South America); however, hotspots of manure and fertilizer N application shifted from Europe to southern Asia in the early 21st century. The new three global datasets contribute to the filling of the previous data gaps of global and regional N inputs in pastures and rangelands, improving the abilities of ecosystem and earth system models to investigate the global impacts of N enrichment due to agriculture, in terms of associated greenhouse gas emissions and environmental sustainability issues. Datasets are available at 10.1594/PANGAEA.892940.
Article
Full-text available
Significance As Brazil’s cropland expands as a result of increasing demand for commodity crops, new croplands replace existing land covers and land uses. Our study employs the most spatially detailed historical record of satellite imagery available to show that the area of intensive row cropping in Brazil nearly doubled from 2000 to 2014 mainly because of the repurposing of pastures (80% of new cropland) rather than conversion of natural vegetation (20%). Trends of cropland expansion through time may be linked to land use policies, market conditions, and other factors. Although evidence suggests that land use policies slowed cropland expansion within Amazon rainforests, no such decrease was found for Cerrado savannas, which experienced 2.5 times the natural vegetation conversion of the Amazon biome.
Article
Full-text available
Land-use changes are critical for climate policy because native vegetation and soils store abundant carbon and their losses from agricultural expansion, together with emissions from agricultural production, contribute about 20 to 25 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions1,2. Most climate strategies require maintaining or increasing land-based carbon³ while meeting food demands, which are expected to grow by more than 50 per cent by 20501,2,4. A finite global land area implies that fulfilling these strategies requires increasing global land-use efficiency of both storing carbon and producing food. Yet measuring the efficiency of land-use changes from the perspective of greenhouse gas emissions is challenging, particularly when land outputs change, for example, from one food to another or from food to carbon storage in forests. Intuitively, if a hectare of land produces maize well and forest poorly, maize should be the more efficient use of land, and vice versa. However, quantifying this difference and the yields at which the balance changes requires a common metric that factors in different outputs, emissions from different agricultural inputs (such as fertilizer) and the different productive potentials of land due to physical factors such as rainfall or soils. Here we propose a carbon benefits index that measures how changes in the output types, output quantities and production processes of a hectare of land contribute to the global capacity to store carbon and to reduce total greenhouse gas emissions. This index does not evaluate biodiversity or other ecosystem values, which must be analysed separately. We apply the index to a range of land-use and consumption choices relevant to climate policy, such as reforesting pastures, biofuel production and diet changes. We find that these choices can have much greater implications for the climate than previously understood because standard methods for evaluating the effects of land use4–11 on greenhouse gas emissions systematically underestimate the opportunity of land to store carbon if it is not used for agriculture.
Article
Deforestation, the second largest source of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, is largely driven by expanding forestry and agriculture. However, despite agricultural expansion being increasingly driven by foreign demand, the links between deforestation and foreign demand for agricultural commodities have only been partially mapped. Here we present a pan-tropical quantification of carbon emissions from deforestation associated with the expansion of agriculture and forest plantations, and trace embodied emissions through global supply chains to consumers. We find that in the period 2010–2014, expansion of agriculture and tree plantations into forests across the tropics was associated with net emissions of approximately 2.6 gigatonnes carbon dioxide per year. Cattle and oilseed products account for over half of these emissions. Europe and China are major importers, and for many developed countries, deforestation emissions embodied in imports rival or exceed emissions from domestic agriculture. Depending on the trade model used, 29–39% of deforestation-related emissions were driven by international trade. This is substantially higher than the share of fossil carbon emissions embodied in trade, indicating that efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from land-use change need to consider the role of international demand in driving deforestation. Additionally, we find that deforestation emissions are similar to, or larger than, other emissions in the carbon footprint of key forest-risk commodities. Similarly, deforestation emissions constitute a substantial share (˜15%) of the total carbon footprint of food consumption in EU countries. This highlights the need for consumption-based accounts to include emissions from deforestation, and for the implementation of policy measures that cross these international supply-chains if deforestation emissions are to be effectively reduced.