A preview of this full-text is provided by American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Content available from Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
JSLHR
Review Article
A Systematic Review of Expressive
and Receptive Prosody in People
With Dementia
Chorong Oh,
a
Richard J. Morris,
b
and Xianhui Wang
a
Purpose: This review was designed to provide a systematic
overview of prosody in people with a primary diagnosis of
dementia (PwD) and evaluate the potential use of prosodic
features for diagnosis of dementia.
Method: A systematic search of five databases was
conducted using Medical Subject Headings and keywords.
Studies included in the review were evaluated for their
methodological quality using the modified Joanna Briggs
Institute checklist.
Results: A total of 14 articles were identified as being relevant
for this review. Among the 14 articles, the methodological
quality ranged, with eight rated as weak, four rated as
moderate, and two rated as strong. Ten of the 14 articles
had people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) as participants,
and the remaining four had people with frontotemporal
dementia as participants. Four articles focused on receptive
prosody, another six focused on expressive prosody, and
the remaining four articles were investigations into both.
The 14 articles presented inconsistent findings, and various
tasks were used to measure prosodic features in PwD in
the articles. Prosody was studied as a diagnostic tool for
dementia in four of the articles, all of which were based on
expressive prosody in individuals with AD. Among the four
articles, three proposed the use of automatic speech analysis
for diagnosis of AD.
Conclusions: This review demonstrates that prosody in
PwD is an underinvestigated area. In particular, it was
concerning that most articles were of weak methodological
quality. Nevertheless, it was found that prosody may be
a potential diagnostic tool for assessing dementia. More
studies that replicate the existing studies and those with
stronger methodology are needed to confirm that receptive
and/or expressive prosody can be used for dementia
diagnosis.
Around the world, approximately 50 million people
have dementia, and roughly 10 million people
develop the disease every year (World Health
Organization [WHO], 2018). Consequently, a growing
need exists for clinical assessment and management of people
with dementia (PwD; Brookmeyer et al., 1998). Speech-
language pathologists (SLPs) play an essential role support-
ing PwD, their family members, and the general population
(Bourgeois et al., 2016) by assessing, diagnosing, and treat-
ing PwD and by educating caregivers (American Speech-
Language-Hearing Association, 2016). In doing this work,
SLPs and other clinicians need to maintain awareness of
the distinct phenotypes of dementia that include Alzheimer’s
dementia (AD), Lewy body dementia (LBD), vascular demen-
tia (VaD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and mixed de-
mentia (WHO, 2018). These distinct phenotypes of dementia
highlight the need among SLPs and other health profes-
sionals for evidence-based, objective measures they can use
for making accurate evaluations of the cognitive deficits
presented by people with different types of dementia. These
measures can help SLPs provide their services effectively
and efficiently. Furthermore, with a better understanding
of the differences in cognitive–linguistic deficits among
PwD, SLPs will be able to design and evaluate interven-
tions that better serve the different phenotypes of demen-
tia. Consequently, this line of research may contribute to
an improved quality of life for PwD and their caregivers.
To date, research to differentiate among the dementia
variants has relied heavily upon a weighted combination
of genetic and protein biomarkers at the cellular level,
neuroanatomical integrity at the organ level, and physical/
psychological behavior at the organism level (Reilly et al.,
2010). However, only a small number of studies report on
a
School of Rehabilitation and Communication Sciences, Ohio
University, Athens
b
School of Communication Science & Disorders, Florida State
University, Tallahassee
Correspondence to Chorong Oh: ohc@ohio.edu
Editor-in-Chief: Bharath Chandrasekaran
Editor: Cara E. Stepp
Received January 7, 2021
Revision received April 15, 2021
Accepted June 13, 2021
https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00013
Disclosure: The authors have declared that no competing financial or nonfinancial
interests existed at the time of publication.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research •Vol. 64 •3803–3825 •October 2021 •Copyright © 2021 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 3803