Content uploaded by Miltiadis Athanasiou
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Miltiadis Athanasiou on Sep 30, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
20o -
1
-
20o -
2
-
-
-
ISBN: 978-618-84551-2-2
20o -
111
-
1 2 1
1
andlag@upatras.gr
2Wildfire Management Consulting and Training, 8, 13673 , info@m-
athanasiou.gr
FARSITE 4.
AsterG QuantumGIS.
,
kW
Sorensen- Dice (
FARSITE.
- - a,b,c -
-
20o -
112
c
lamMap FARSITE - -
Albini
(1976), Anderson
Prabhakara
Farsite
FARSITE
Quantum GIS QGIS
GRASS
Aster GDEM
(Advanced
-
(https://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gdem.asp).
QGiS
Earthexplorer (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/).
km
20o -
113
(T) = 34 =
cm -hr
10-
hr ( cm)
-hr (
-
Table 1. Description of the six discrete scenarios used for the wildfire spread simulations. “m.s.M.” is for Megalopolis
meteorological station original recorded data.
1 2 3 4 5 6
“Acceleration”
(wind speed)
[Beaufort (km·h-1)] (m.s.M.)
4
(24) (m.s.M.) 4 (24) 5 (34)
(wind direction) (m.s.M.)
180°(14:00-16:30)
225°(16:30-22:00)
180°(14:00-16:30)
225°(16:30-22:00)
180°(14:00-16:30)
210°(16:30-21:00)
225°(21:00-22:00)
x = 340706, y
vector
h min
2
Sorensen-
=(1)
a b
c
= (2)
kW
SD
20o -
114
. Sorensen – Dice (SD)
Table 2. Relative change and Sorensen – Dice (SD) coefficient for the six scenarios.
1
2
3
4
5
6
[km2(ha)]
2,83
(283)
1,83
(183)
1,20
(120)
1,02
(102)
1,50
(150)
1,27
(127)
1,87
(187)
-
35,38
-
57,49
-
63,86
-
47,12
-
55,07
-
33,92
0,19 0,16 0,13 0,21 0,28 0,53
Table 3. Wildfire behaviour prediction for the six scenarios. In the second column, estimated perimeter at 15:00 (white),
17:00 (yellow) and 20:00 (red).
(Scenario)
6,
The orange polygon at scenario 6,
represents the actual burned area
(m/min)
Rate of spread (m/min)
(kW/m)
Fireline Intensity (kW/m)
1
2
3
4
5
20o -
115
6
–
-
-
-1.
,
1. H
[ , (source):
https://www.you tube.com /watch? v=RWWk209 pjMI& fbclid=
IwAR0_maSU UQg 5wp1e XVR 0Ca7BPgfzk LeAhYN_O5HG
WfT6dVZ hkZtqU ovOx0E]
Figure 1. The wildfire spreads through Mediterranean shrublands
2. ,
[
, (source):
https://www.you tube.com /watch? v=RWWk209
pjMI& fbclid= IwAR0_maSU UQg 5wp1e XVR
0Ca7BPgfzk LeAhYN_O5HG WfT6dVZ hkZtqU
ovOx0E]
Figure 2. Dozers were used for Fireline
construction
2
187 ha
SD.
SD
ROS
20o -
116
ROS I
3.
(Papadopoulos and Pavlidou 2011).
Figure 3. Profile along the main axis of the head fire spread. A: eruption point, B & : significant change of head spread
direction, : end of profile
20o -
117
FlamMap
Kalabokidis
Abstract
FARSITE (now included in FlamMap6) was used to simulate the spread and behavior of a wildfire that
had been documented in Arcadia, Greece, in 2017. A Digital Elevation Model (Aster GDEM), available
at no cost from a remote sensing instrument operating aboard NASA's Terra satellite [Japan's Ministry
of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) radiometer], was downloaded from
https://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov /gdem.asp and processed using Quantum GIS (http://www.qgis.org).
Satellite images Landsat 8 OLI were classified by an object-oriented analysis method, supporting fuel
mapping, and data from an adjacent meteorological station of National Observatory of Athens allowed
a detailed description of the wind field. Fire spread simulations were run for six discrete wind field
scenarios, and the obtained results are presented along with a thorough discussion of strengths, potential
benefits as well as weaknesses of the applied method.
BehavePlus -
-
Cistus spp -
International Workshop, 8-
Albini, F.A., 1976. Estimating wildfire behavior and effects. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-30. Ogden, UT:
USDA, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 92 p.
Anderson, H. E., 1982. Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior. USDA For.
Serv., Research Note RM - 354. 4 pp.
Andrews P.L., Bevins C.D. and Seli., R.C., 2005. BehavePlus fire modeling system, Version 4.0:
User’s Guide. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-106WWW revised. Ogden, UT: USDA, Forest
Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 132 p.
Arca B., Duce P., Pellizzaro G., Bacciu V., Salis, M. and Spano., D., 2007. Evaluation of FARSITE
Simulator in a Mediterranean Area, The 4th International Wildland Fire Conference, Seville, Spain.
Dice, Lee R., 1945. Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species. Ecology. 26
(3): 297–302. doi:10.2307/1932409. JSTOR 1932409.
Dimitrakopoulos, A. P., G. Xanthopoulos, and Mateeva., V., 1999. Statistical classification of
mediterranean fuel types in Greece. pp. 125-131. In proceedings of the International Symposium on
“Forest Fires: Needs and Innovations”. November 18-19, 1999, Athens, Greece. Published by CINAR
S.A., Athens, Greece, under the auspices of the European Commission DG XII. 419 p.
V. Mateeva
VI,
-206.
Dimitrakopoulos, A. P.. 2002. Mediterranean fuel models and potential fire behaviour in Greece,
International Journal of Wildland Fire 11(2) 127 – 130.
20o -
118
Finney M.A. and Ryan, K.C., 1995. Use of the FARSITE fire growth model for fire prediction in US
National Parks. Proc. The International Emergency Mgt. and Engineering Conf. May 1995 Sofia
Antipolis, France. p. 183-189.
Finney, M.A., 1998. FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-model development and evaluation. Res. Pap.
RMRS-RP-4, Ogden, UT: USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 47 p.
Finney, M.A., 2004. FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-Model Development and Evaluation (revised).
Res. Paper RMRS-RP-4 revised. UT: USDA, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, 52 p.
Finney, M. A., 2006. An overview of FlamMap fire modeling capabilities. In: Fuels management—
how to measure success: conference proceedings. 2006 March 28-30; Portland, Oregon. Proceedings
RMRS-P-41. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain
Research Station: 213-220. (647 KB; 13 pages).
Kalabokidis, K., Palaiologou, P., Finney, M. A., 2013. Fire behavior simulation in Mediterranean
forests using the minimum travel time algorithm. In: Fourth Fire Behavior and Fuels Conference
Proceedings - At The Crossroads: Looking Toward the Future in a Changing Environment; July 1-4,
2013; St. Petersburg, Russia. Missoula, MT: International Association of Wildland Fire. p. 468-492.
Papadopoulos, G. and F.N. Pavlidou. 2011. A comparative review on wildfire simulators. IEEE
Systems Journal 5, 233-243.
Prabhakara, K., Hively, W. D., & McCarty, G. W., 2015. Evaluating the relationship between
biomass, percent groundcover and remote sensing indices across six winter cover crop fields in
Maryland, United States. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 88-
102.
-
-
-
1- .
Rothermel, R.C., 1972. A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. Res. Pap.
INT-115. Ogden, UT: USDA, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 40
p.
Rothermel, R.C., 1983. How to predict the spread and intensity of forest and range fires. Gen. Tech.
Rep. INT-143. Ogden, UT: USDA, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
161 p. Rothermel,R. C. Predicting Behavior and Size of Crown Fires in the Nothern Rocky Mountains
1991.
Scott, J. E. and Burgan, R. E., 2005. Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use
with Rothermel's surface fire spread model. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-153. 72 p.
Sorensen, T., 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on
similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons.
Videnski Selsk. Biol. Skr. 5: 1-34.
Sullivan, A. L., 2009a. Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 1: Physical and quasi-
physical models. International Journal of Wildland Fire , 349-368.
Sullivan, A. L., 2009b. Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 2: Empirical and quasi-
empirical models. International Journal of Wildland Fire , 369-386.
Sullivan, A. L., 2009c. Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 3: Simulation and
mathematical analogue models .Int. J. Wildland Fire , 387-403.
Tucker, C.J., 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation.
Remote Sensing of Environment, 8, 127-150. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0.