PreprintPDF Available

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in Children Ages 12-17: A Stratified National Database Analysis

Authors:
  • Artemis Biomedical Communications LLC

Abstract and Figures

Objectives: Establishing the rate of post-vaccination cardiac myocarditis in the 12-15 and 16-17-year-old population in the context of their COVID-19 hospitalization risk is critical for developing a vaccination recommendation framework that balances harms with benefits for this patient demographic. Design, Setting and Participants: Using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), this retrospective epidemiological assessment reviewed reports filed between January 1, 2021, and June 18, 2021, among adolescents ages 12-17 who received mRNA vaccination against COVID-19. Symptom search criteria included the words myocarditis, pericarditis, and myopericarditis to identify children with evidence of cardiac injury. The word troponin was a required element in the laboratory findings. Inclusion criteria were aligned with the CDC working case definition for probable myocarditis. Stratified cardiac adverse event (CAE) rates were reported for age, sex and vaccination dose number. A harm-benefit analysis was conducted using existing literature on COVID-19-related hospitalization risks in this demographic. Main outcome measures: 1) Stratified rates of mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis in adolescents age 12-15 and 16-17; and 2) harm-benefit analysis of vaccine-related CAEs in relation to COVID-19 hospitalization risk. Results: A total of 257 CAEs were identified. Rates per million following dose 2 among males were 162.2 (ages 12-15) and 94.0 (ages 16-17); among females, rates were 13.0 and 13.4 per million, respectively. For boys 12-15 without medical comorbidities receiving their second mRNA vaccination dose, the rate of CAE is 3.7-6.1 times higher than their 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization risk as of August 21, 2021 (7-day hospitalizations 1.5/100k population) and 2.6-4.3-fold higher at times of high weekly hospitalization risk (2.1/100k), such as during January 2021. For boys 16-17 without medical comorbidities, the rate of CAE is currently 2.1-3.5 times higher than their 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization risk, and 1.5-2.5 times higher at times of high weekly COVID-19 hospitalization. Conclusions: Post-vaccination CAE rate was highest in young boys aged 12-15 following dose two. For boys 12-17 without medical comorbidities, the likelihood of post vaccination dose two CAE is 162.2 and 94.0/million respectively. This incidence exceeds their expected 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization rate at both moderate (August 21, 2021 rates) and high COVID-19 hospitalization incidence. Further research into the severity and long-term sequelae of post-vaccination CAE is warranted. Quantification of the benefits of the second vaccination dose and vaccination in addition to natural immunity in this demographic may be indicated to minimize harm.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
August 30th, 2021
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in Children
Ages 12-17: A Stratified National Database Analysis
Authors: Tracy Beth Høeg MD, PhD1; Allison Krug, MPH2; Josh Stevenson3; John Mandrola,
MD4
Affiliations:
1. University of California - Davis, Sacramento, CA
2. Artemis Biomedical Communications, LLC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA
3. Truth in Data, LLC, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
4. Baptist Health Louisville, Louisville KY
Corresponding Author email: tracybethhoeg@gmail.com
Corresponding Author: 4860 Y St #1700, Sacramento, CA 95817; (916) 734-7041
Funding: None
Keywords: myocarditis, mRNA, vaccination, COVID-19, pediatrics, drug-related side effects
and adverse reactions
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.
2
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in Children Ages 12-17:
A Stratified National Database Analysis
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Establishing the rate of post-vaccination cardiac myocarditis in the 12-15 and 16-17-
year-old population in the context of their COVID-19 hospitalization risk is critical for
developing a vaccination recommendation framework that balances harms with benefits for this
patient demographic.
Design, Setting and Participants: Using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
(VAERS), this retrospective epidemiological assessment reviewed reports filed between January
1, 2021, and June 18, 2021, among adolescents ages 12-17 who received mRNA vaccination
against COVID-19. Symptom search criteria included the words chest pain, myocarditis,
pericarditis and myopericarditis to identify children with evidence of cardiac injury. The word
troponin was a required element in the laboratory findings. Inclusion criteria were aligned with
the CDC working case definition for probable myocarditis. Stratified cardiac adverse event
(CAE) rates were reported for age, sex and vaccination dose number. A harm-benefit analysis
was conducted using existing literature on COVID-19-related hospitalization risks in this
demographic.
Main outcome measures: 1) Stratified rates of mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis in
adolescents age 12-15 and 16-17; and 2) harm-benefit analysis of vaccine-related CAEs in
relation to COVID-19 hospitalization risk.
Results: A total of 257 CAEs were identified. Rates per million following dose 2 among males
were 162.2 (ages 12-15) and 94.0 (ages 16-17); among females, rates were 13.0 and 13.4 per
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
3
million, respectively. For boys 12-15 without medical comorbidities receiving their second
mRNA vaccination dose, the rate of CAE is 3.7 to 6.1 times higher than their 120-day COVID-
19 hospitalization risk as of August 21, 2021 (7-day hospitalizations 1.5/100k population) and
2.6-4.3-fold higher at times of high weekly hospitalization risk (7-day hospitalizations 2.1/100k),
such as during January 2021. For boys 16-17 without medical comorbidities, the rate of CAE is
currently 2.1 to 3.5 times higher than their 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization risk, and 1.5 to
2.5 times higher at times of high weekly COVID-19 hospitalization.
Conclusions: Post-vaccination CAE rate was highest in young boys aged 12-15 following dose
two. For boys 12-17 without medical comorbidities, the likelihood of post vaccination dose two
CAE is 162.2 and 94.0/million respectively. This incidence exceeds their expected 120-day
COVID-19 hospitalization rate at both moderate (August 21, 2021 rates) and high COVID-19
hospitalization incidence. Further research into the severity and long-term sequelae of post-
vaccination CAE is warranted. Quantification of the benefits of the second vaccination dose and
vaccination in addition to natural immunity in this demographic may be indicated to minimize
harm.
INTRODUCTION
Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 have
demonstrated exceptional safety and real-world effectiveness in preventing severe disease and
death from COVID-19. Concerns about vaccination-related myocarditis in young men were
initially raised in Israel with rates between 1/3000-1/6000.[1] In the United States, the initial
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report[2,3] identified a rate of approximately
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
4
12.6 per million (1/80,000) second doses administered in ages 12-39, but approximately
1/15,000 for males 12-17 and 1/19,000 for males 18-24.[2,3]
Although the CDC analyses [2,3] identified a higher rate of myocarditis in boys than young men,
further stratification by adolescent age group (e.g., 12-15 and 16-17 years) was not provided. A
second potential limitation was the sensitivity of the CDC symptom search inclusion criteria,
which may have failed to identify cases of cardiac adverse events (CAEs), consistent with
myocarditis, with objective evidence of cardiac injury following vaccination.
On August 23rd, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) released a Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine
report[4] which outlines “an excess risk [of myocarditis] approaching 200 cases/million” or
1/5000 in 1617-year-old boys, which was three times higher than reported by the CDC [2,3]. In
their harm-benefit analysis, the most likely scenario was the benefits of vaccination would
outweigh harms in 16-17-year-old males, but “predicted excess cases of vaccine-associated
myocarditis/pericarditis would exceed COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths under the worst
case’ scenario” [4].
Post-vaccination myocarditis rates for the 12-15-year-old age group had not yet been reported
beyond the initial trial with 1131 vaccination recipients [5], until August 30th, 2021, when the
CDC reported [6] the following rates for boys ages 12-15 and 16-17 within seven days of their
second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech at 42.6 and 71.5 per million, respectively. For females, rates
were 4.3 and 8.1 per million, respectively. A harm-benefit analysis of vaccination in the pediatric
age group has not yet been performed based on presence of absence of underlying medical
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
5
conditions. While medical comorbidities confer higher risk for severe COVID-19, this is not
known to be the case for post-vaccination myocarditis.
The CDC [2,6] reported a 94-96% hospitalization rate for VAERS-identified myocarditis. The
CDC used a 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization rate as a meaningful comparator to vaccination-
related harms, and we have chosen to use this same comparison for our study.
Our primary aim was to stratify post-mRNA vaccination myocarditis by age and vaccination
dose within the 1217-year-old population. Our secondary aim was to provide an updated
estimate to complement the CDC’s [2,3,6] and FDA’s [4] findings. Our final aim was to perform
a harm-benefit analysis of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination myocarditis with that of COVID-19
hospitalization for children with and without one or more comorbidity at low, moderate, and high
120-day COVID-19 hospitalization rates.
METHODS
We searched the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data for females and males
ages 12-17 in reports processed from 1/1/2021 through 6/18/2021 with diagnoses of
myocarditis, pericarditis,” “myopericarditis” or “chest pain” in the symptom notes and
required the term “troponin” in the laboratory data. We defined a CAE using the CDC working
case definition for a probable case.[2] Specifically, the symptom of “chest pain” required at least
one of the following: diagnosis of myocarditis, peri- or myopericarditis, acute myocardial
infarction; elevated troponin; abnormal electrocardiogram (EKG), abnormal echocardiogram
(ECHO), or cardiac MRI (cMRI) findings consistent with myocarditis (as defined in Supplement
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
6
1). Cases and hospitalizations with an unknown dose number were assigned to dose 1 or dose 2
in the same proportion as the known doses: 15% occurred following dose 1 and 85% occurred
following dose 2.
To compute crude rates per million for doses 1 and 2, our denominators included all children
with at least 1 dose of any vaccination and all fully vaccinated children, respectively, as of
6/11/2021[6] to accommodate both reporting lag and a pre-defined 7-day risk window, consistent
with the CDC’s analysis. 95% Poisson confidence intervals were calculated for these rates.
To perform a harm-benefit analysis, pediatric hospitalization rates for COVID-19 were obtained
from the CDC’s COVID-NET.[7] COVID-19 hospitalization rates among children with and
without one or more medical comorbidities were calculated based on hospitalization rates at
times of low (June 2021), moderate (August 2021) and high (January 2021) incidence.[8]
Children with at least one medical comorbidity were considered to have 4.7 times the likelihood
of COVID-19 hospitalization as those without comorbidities based on 70% of children
hospitalized for COVID-19 having one or more medical comorbidity.[9] We estimate 33% of
children in this age group have one or more comorbidity based upon current data[10] suggesting
21.2% of children 12-19 have obesity and around 8.4% have asthma.[11] These comorbidities
are also found in the summary of underlying conditions for pediatric COVID-19 hospitalizations
reported to COVID-NET.[8] The two most common underlying conditions among pediatric
hospitalizations are obesity (33.8%) and asthma (14.8%).[8] Other relevant comorbidities such as
diabetes[11] or the medically complex children[12] appear to make up <5% of this
demographic.[11] The estimated ratio of expected hospitalizations for children by presence or
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
7
absence of comorbidity must therefore account for the relative proportions of children with and
without comorbidities in the population, and among those admitted for COVID-19. The
computation is as follows: [(0.67/0.33) / (0.3/0.7) = (0.67*0.7) / (0.33*0.3) = 0.469 / 0.099 =
4.7], in other words a 4.7-fold difference in hospitalization risk for children with and without
medical comorbidities.
We provided an additional rate which adjusted for the reported approximate 40% of pediatric
hospitalizations for COVID-19 being incidental positive tests on admission.[9,13,14] Finally,
the risk of post-vaccination CAE post-dose two in 1215-year-old-boys was compared with their
overall risk of hospitalization from COVID-19 according to presence or absence of comorbidities
and adjusted for the 40% hospitalization overestimate as well as the asymptomatic fraction of
pediatric cases.
Data were analyzed using Microsoft PowerBI, Stata and Microsoft Excel
RESULTS
A total of 276 reports met our initial search criteria; of these, 18 were excluded because they had
no objective evidence of elevated troponins or abnormal findings on ECG/EKG or ECHO, or we
could not exclude the possibility of viral myocarditis or concomitant pneumonia. Of the 18
excluded cases, eight were hospitalized. Nine were 12-15 and nine were 16-17 years old. Sixteen
of the excluded cases were coded “chest pain” in the symptom notes and the remaining two
females were coded as “myocarditis” but no troponin values nor EKG/ECG findings were
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
8
included. Of the remaining 258 cases, we excluded from sex-specific rates one case with
“unknown” sex, leaving 257 cardiac adverse event reports for full analysis (25 females and 232
males). Of these, 211 cases had peak troponin values available for analysis (Supplement 2); 37
reports did not include the vaccine dose number. Of the 257 included cases, 256 had received
Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccination, one had received Moderna mRNA vaccination (only
Pfizer-BioNTech was approved for vaccination of children <18 at the time of our database
search).
The CAE rates by age and sex and vaccination dose are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1.
(Interactive data visualizations and full VAERS case notes available at this link:
https://bit.ly/CAEmRNA). Our post-second-dose-vaccination rates of CAE among adolescent
boys aged 12-15 was 162.2/million which exceeded the rates reported by the CDC[2,6] by 143-
280% (2.4-3.8 times). Among boys age 16-17, our estimate was 94.0/million, 31.5-41% higher
than the CDC estimate. For girls 12-15 years old, our rate was 13.0/million, which was 43-100%
higher that the CDC’s estimate.[2,6] Among girls 16-17, our estimate was 13.4/million, which
was 47-65% higher than the CDC’s estimate.
Rates per million following dose 1 among males were: 12.0 per million (ages 12-15) and 8.2 per
million (ages 16-17). Rates per million following dose 1 among females were 0 (ages 12-15) and
2.0 (ages 16-17). With respect to dose 1 and compared to CDC findings, 1215-year-old boys
were 22-150% higher than the CDC, while girls this age had zero CAEs in our analysis. Among
adolescents ages 16-17, our rates were 16% lower to 58% higher for boys and 82% higher for
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
9
girls [2] and in the updated CDC report [6] the reported rate for girls 16-17 post-dose one was
0.0 per million.
The CAE cases in our investigation occurred a median of 2 days following vaccination, and
91.9% occurred within 5 days. The reported CAE hospitalization rate for our study group was
222/257 (86.4%); 112/130 (86.2%) in the 1215-year-old cohort and 110/127 (86.6%) in the 16
17-year-old cohort (Figure 2). Specific hospitalization rates for boys were 106/122 (86.9%) for
the 1215-year-old boys and 96/110 (87.3%) for the 1617-year-old boys (Figure 2).
The median peak troponin T/I (Figure 3) (normal <0.1 ng/mL) was 5.2 ng/mL in boys ages 12-
15 and 11.6 ng/mL in boys ages 16-17; for girls, the medians were 0.8 ng/mL and 7.3 ng/mL,
respectively. Peak troponin values exceeded 2 ng/mL for 71% of cases age 12-15 and 82% of
cases age 16-17. Figure 4 shows the time course of troponin increases after vaccination: 183/211
(86.7%) measured as elevated within 4 days. For the 221 cases for which the dose number was
available, 32 (15%) occurred after dose 1 and 189 (85%) occurred after dose 2. The 37 cases
with an unknown dose number were assigned proportionately to the overall distribution among
the cases with a known dose number: 5 were assigned to dose one and 32 were assigned to dose
two.
COVID-19 hospitalization vs. vaccination harms
In the seven-month period of January 2021-July 2021, the rate of COVID-19 hospitalization
among adolescents (ages 12-17) has ranged from a low of 4 per million weekly (July 2021) to
moderate level (15 per million per week in mid-August 2021) and high (21 per million per week
in January 2021) (Figure 6).[8,9] A healthy adolescent might expect a COVID-19 hospitalization
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
10
risk of 44.4 per million over the next 120 days, assuming disease-related hospitalization
prevalence stays at moderate levels (Figure 6, Figure 7). A child with at least one comorbidity
might expect a disease-associated hospitalization rate of 210.5 per million per 120 days during
times of moderate hospitalization, with a peak hospitalization risk of 294.7 per million per 120-
days if rates surge to the same high level as January 2021.
At times of low adolescent COVID-19 hospitalization rates, such as in June 2021, a CAE from
the second dose of an mRNA vaccine in a healthy 1215-year-old boy was 13.7-fold more likely,
at 162.2 per million, than the 120-day risk of COVID-19 hospitalization. The rate of post-
vaccination CAE for boys 12-15 years without comorbidities (162.2/million) receiving their
second vaccination dose exceeds their current 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization risk
(44.4/million) by 3.7 times. In 1617-year-old boys without comorbidities, the risk of post-dose
two vaccination CAE exceeds their current 120-day hospitalization risk by 2.1 times
(94.0/million vs. 44.4/million per 120-days). Our estimated risk of post-second vaccination dose
CAE hospitalization for boys 12-15 without medical comorbidities (141/million; based on 86.9%
hospitalization rate) also exceeds that of their 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization risk even at
high hospitalization rates (Figures 6 and 7). For 1217-year-old-boys with at least one medical
comorbidity (Figure 6 and 7) their risk of post-vaccination CAE only exceeds their 120-day
COVID-19 hospitalization risk at times of low hospitalization rates.
We also performed an adjusted analysis based on 40% of COVID-19 hospitalizations being due
to another cause with incidental positive COVID-19 test during the hospitalization [8,12,13]. At
current moderate incidence, the 120-day hospitalization risk for COVID-19 for a healthy child
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
11
may be as low as 26.7 per million (Figure 6 in italics), twice the risk of a CAE after vaccine dose
1 in boys without comorbidities and after dose 2 in girls without comorbidities (Table 1). The
risk for boys aged 12-15 with no comorbidities of CAE after dose two would be 22.8 times
higher than their COVID-19 hospitalization risk at the adjusted low (7.1/million), 6.1 times
higher for moderate (26.7/million) and 4.3 times higher at high (37.3/million) 120-day
hospitalization rates (Figures 6 and 7). The risk for boys 16-17 with no comorbidities of CAE
after dose 2 would be and 13.2 times higher than their COVID-19 hospitalization risk at the
adjusted low (7.1/million), 3.5 times higher at moderate (26.7/million) and 2.5 times higher at
high (37.3/million) 120-day adjusted hospitalization rates (Figures 6 and 7). For 1215-year-old
boys with one or more comorbidity, the vaccine-associated CAE risk following dose two is less
than the adjusted COVID-19 hospitalization risk at times of high COVID-19 incidence. For 16
17-year-old boys with one or more comorbidity, the CAE rate was below that of the adjusted
COVID-19 hospitalization risks at both current (moderate) and high disease prevalence (Figure
7; Table 1).
DISCUSSION
Principal findings
The main finding of this study was the cardiac adverse event (CAE) rates of 162/million and
94/million post- Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccination dose two for the 12-15- and 1617-
year-old boys, respectively. Approximately 86% of these resulted in hospitalization for both age
groups. We included a case-finding method in VAERS which utilized the symptom “chest pain”
to identify adolescents for review of troponins, EKG/ECG and ECHO findings. We otherwise
maintained the specificity of our analysis by requiring the same objective findings of cardiac
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
12
injury used by the CDC to identify probable cases (Supplement 1) and excluded cases without
sufficient objective evidence of cardiac-specific injury.
Using these broader search and inclusion criteria, we found post-vaccination rates of CAEs
among adolescents aged 12-17 that exceeded the rates previously reported by the CDC[2] by 2.5
times in boys aged 12-15 and by 1.7 x in 16-17-year-old boys. Our results show the risk of
myocarditis depends heavily on sex and age, as it appears that young boys 12-15 have a greater
than 12 times higher rate than girls. Due to a markedly increased risk for the youngest boys,
prospective safety analyses would be most useful if stratified by ages 12-15 years and 16-17
years.
The highest troponin elevations were seen in the 1617-year-old boys and girls. In the setting of
cardiac symptoms, children with elevated troponin levels have a high likelihood of cardiac
disease.[17, 18] Of note, the threshold for normal levels in children may be even lower than the
0.1 ng/mL used in adults.[17]
To contextualize the benefits of vaccination for adolescents, we chose, as the CDC did [2,3] to
provide a benefit-harm analysis based on varying levels of COVID-19 hospitalization rates.[19]
Our analysis not only considered circulating disease levels but also the presence of individual
risk factors for severe disease. A weakness of our analysis was not being able to stratify
hospitalization risks for children with and without natural immunity. The CDC estimated that on
May 29th, 2021, that 36.2% [15] of all children had already been infected with SARS-CoV-2.
This estimate was made 16 months into the pandemic, thus adjusting for the current time (19
months), the current estimate would be (19/16)*36.2% = 42.9% of children previously infected.
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
13
Absolute infection-hospitalization rates for children with and without medical comorbidities and
with and without history of infection have yet to be established.
In a recent report[20] of 15 patients aged 12-18 hospitalized with post-vaccination myocarditis,
the clinical course was reported to be relatively benign, but 1/15 had abnormal echocardiogram
on follow-up and 4/15 had ongoing symptoms post-discharge. The CDC reported [2] that 218 of
the 323 (67.5%) cases of myo/pericarditis in vaccine recipients <30 years were known to have
had resolution of symptoms. Another study[21] found 16/23 (70%) males with vaccination-
associated myocarditis to have had resolution of symptoms within a week. Long-term sequalae
of myocarditis is unknown; follow-up of this vaccine-associated condition is warranted.
COVID-19 has also been found to result in symptomatic myocarditis in 0.3% of collegiate
athletes,[22] but its rate in children post-COVID-19 infection has not been well described. The
one existing study[23] is limited by an inappropriately small denominator due to apparent
underestimate of COVID-19 disease incidence during the study period. The study[23] reported
only six post-COVID myocarditis cases in boys ages 12-17 over the course of a year in a 60-
million patient catchment area. Children have in general been spared from the worst effects of
COVID-19. The reported mortality rate in England has so far been 2/million children [24,25],
which may translate to around 6/million infections based on a prior infection rate of 1/3.[15] In
the US, there have been 4404 multisystem-inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) cases in
a population of 74 million.[26] Long-duration of symptoms post-COVID-19 also appears less
frequent in children than initially feared, with 1.8% of children with symptomatic COVID-19
experiencing at least one symptom two months after infection compared with 0.9% of negatively
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
14
tested controls after one month.[27] A thorough understanding of vaccine safety is thus crucial in
this age group, especially for children without known risk factors for severe COVID-19 and
those with history of infection. This report only outlines rates associated with the Pfizer-
BioNTech. A recent report from Canada [28] suggests a greater than 2-fold higher rate of post-
vaccination myocarditis from the Moderna mRNA vaccine compared to the Pfizer-BioNTech
mRNA vaccine. The most recent CDC update [6] also found Moderna to have higher rates of
post-vaccination myocarditis than Pfizer-BioNTech in all male age groups except those 16-17
years and those 65 and older.
A concern about using VAERS for our data analysis is the risk of over-ascertainment of a safety
signal due to the open access system. To address this concern, we aligned our inclusion criteria
with the CDC’s case definition for probable myocarditis. Our rate of myocarditis post-
vaccination of 94.0/million was more than two times lower than that reported by the FDA
(200/million) [2] and yet 31.5% higher than the CDC. This suggests that both VAERS and CDC
are providing an underestimate of the true incidence of this condition. Furthermore, the reports in
VAERS reviewed for this study were of children with myocarditis with cardiac symptoms and
not cases of incidental cardiac inflammation noted on imaging. It is thus unclear how large of an
underestimate of CAE incidence this report provides.
We, like the CDC, used a 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization rate as a meaningful comparator to
vaccination-related harms, but this type of harm-benefit analysis does not take into account any
benefits the vaccine provides against transmission to others, long-term COVID-19 disease risk or
protection from non-severe COVID-19 symptoms. With this in mind, the risk of CAE for a boy
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
15
receiving his second dose of the vaccine is 2 to 6 times higher than the 120-day risk of
hospitalization in boys 12-17 without underlying medical conditions. For boys with medical
comorbidities, the 120-day COVID hospitalization rates are slightly higher than their rate of
CAE if not adjusting for possible 40% overestimate of hospitalization rates [9,13,14], in which
case the rate of CAE would be slightly higher than 120-day hospitalization [Figures 6 and 7].
As of the last week of August 2021, hospitalization rates for children ages 12-17 in the United
States continued to approximate the moderate rate shown in Figures 6 and 7.[8] Current pediatric
hospitalization rates are also a product of increasing natural infection and vaccination rates.
Overall pediatric case hospitalization rate from COVID-19 has been estimated by the CDC [15]
and American Academy of Pediatrics [19] to be 0.8-0.9%, irrespective of comorbidities and not
adjusting for possible 40% overestimate of hospitalization rates [9,13,14]. This rate has remained
consistent through August of 2021.
Given the nearly fivefold disparity in risk of hospitalization for adolescents with and without
comorbidities, it is important that the benefits of vaccination be clearly weighed and conveyed in
the context of the unique health risks of the individual and the household. The benefits of
vaccination in previously-infected children should be further studied and a harm-benefit analysis
performed. A history of SARS-CoV-2 infection may be found to provide similar or superior
immunity to vaccination [29]. A recent study [30] found a 4-fold increased risk of post-
vaccination myocarditis in those who had previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2.
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
16
In light of the vaccine-associated cardiac harms described in this report, further research as well
as transparency about possible vaccine-related harms in relation to an individual child’s COVID-
19 risks is indicated. Alternate vaccination types, dosing or strategies, such as those that take a
history of infection into consideration, may eventually be found to be more appropriate in this
age group.
Conclusion
Our report found post-vaccination CAE rates following dose two of 162.2 and 94.0/million for
boys 12-15 and 16-17, respectively. For boys with no underlying health conditions, the chance of
either CAE, or hospitalization for CAE, after their second dose of mRNA vaccination are
considerably higher than their 120-day risk of COVID-19 hospitalization, even at times of peak
disease prevalence. The long-term consequences of this vaccine-associated cardiac inflammation
are not yet fully defined and should be studied. In lieu of pediatric vaccination mandates, the US
may: 1) consider gathering data on previous infection in this age group and/or 2) follow the
example of Germany,[31] Sweden [32], Norway [33] and the WHO[34] and hold off on
definitively recommending vaccination of low-risk children against COVID-19, or 3) offer one
dose to adolescents as the UK has just announced [35] while more information about risks,
benefits, harms and alternative dosing or vaccination strategies are studied and considered.
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
17
References
1. Israel sees probable link between Pfizer vaccine and myocarditis cases. Published June 2,
2021. Available at https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-sees-probable-link-
between-pfizer-vaccine-small-number-myocarditis-cases-2021-06-01/. Accessed June 23,
2021.
2. Shimabukuro T. (2021, June 23-25). COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Updates. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention. Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices. [ACIP
Workgroup Presentation] ACIP Meeting. Atlanta, GA, United States.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-06/03-COVID-
Shimabukuro-508.pdf accessed June 23, 2021.
3. Wallace M, Oliver S. (2021, June 23-25). COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in adolescents and
young adults: Benefit-risk discussion. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Advisory
Committee for Immunization Practices. [ACIP Workgroup Presentation] ACIP Meeting.
Atlanta, GA, United States. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-
2021-06/05-COVID-Wallace-508.pdf, accessed June 23, 2021.
4. Food and Drug Administration. Summary for regulatory action.
https://www.fda.gov/media/151733/download Accessed August 27, 2021.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vaccination Demographics Trends.
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccination-demographics-trends Accessed June
12, 2021.
6. Su J. (2021, August 30) Myopericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination: Updates from the
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-08-30/03-COVID-Su-
508.pdf accessed August 30, 2021
7. Frenck RW Jr, Klein NP, Kitchin N, et al. C4591001 Clinical Trial Group. Safety,
Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine in Adolescents. N Engl J
Med. 2021 Jul 15;385(3):239-250. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107456. Epub 2021 May 27.
PMID: 34043894; PMCID: PMC8174030.
8. COVID-NET: COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention. https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/covidnet/covid19_3.html:
Accessed on July 6, 2021.
9. Havers FP, Whitaker M, Self JL, et al. Hospitalization of Adolescents Aged 1217 Years
with Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 COVID-NET, 14 States, March 1, 2020April 24,
2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:851857. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7023e1external icon
10. Prevalence of Childhood Obesity in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/childhood.html#:~:text=For%20children%20and%20adole
scents%20aged,to%2019%2Dyear%2Dold
11. Miller GF, Coffield E, Leroy Z, Wallin R. Prevalence and Costs of Five Chronic Conditions
in Children. J Sch Nurs. 2016;32(5):357-364. doi:10.1177/1059840516641190
12. Kuo DZ, Cohen E, Agrawal R, Berry JG, Casey PH. A national profile of caregiver
challenges among more medically complex children with special health care needs. Arch
Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Nov;165(11):1020-6. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.172.
PMID: 22065182; PMCID: PMC3923457.
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
18
13. Webb NE and Osburn TS. Characteristics of Hospitalized Children Positive for SARSCoV-2:
Experience of a Large Center. Hosp Pediatr. 2021; doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-005919
14. Kushner LE, et al. “For COVID” or “With COVID”: Classification of SARS-CoV-2.
Hospitalizations in Children. Hosp Pediatr. 2021; doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006001
15. Estimated COVID-19 Burden. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/burden.html: Accessed on August
22, 2021.
16. Poletti P, Tirani M, Cereda D, et al. Association of Age With Likelihood of Developing
Symptoms and Critical Disease Among Close Contacts Exposed to Patients With Confirmed
SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Italy. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e211085.
doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1085
17. Abrams JY, Oster ME, Godfred-Cato SE, Bryant B, Datta SD, Campbell AP, Leung JW,
Tsang CA, Pierce TJ, Kennedy JL, Hammett TA, Belay ED. Factors linked to severe
outcomes in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) in the USA: a
retrospective surveillance study Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2021; 5: 32331.
18. Dionne A, Kheir JN, Sleeper LA, Esch JJ, Breitbart RE. Value of Troponin Testing for
Detection of Heart Disease in Previously Healthy Children. JAHA 2020;9(4):
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012897
19. Children and COVID-19: State-Level Data Report. AAP. Available at
https://services.aap.org/en/pages/2019-novel-coronavirus-covid-19-infections/children-and-
covid-19-state-level-data-report/ Accessed August 30th, 2021.
20. Dionne A, Sperotto F, Chamberlain S, et al. Association of Myocarditis With BNT162b2
Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Case Series of Children. JAMA Cardiol. Published
online August 10, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.3471
21. Montgomery J, Ryan M, Engler R, et al. Myocarditis Following Immunization With mRNA
COVID-19 Vaccines in Members of the US Military. JAMA Cardiol. Published online June
29, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2833
22. Daniels CJ, Rajpal S, Greenshields JT, et al. Prevalence of Clinical and Subclinical
Myocarditis in Competitive Athletes With Recent SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Results From the
Big Ten COVID-19 Cardiac Registry. JAMA Cardiol. Published online May 27, 2021.
doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2065
23. Singer ME, Taub IB, Kaelber DC. Risk of Myocarditis from COVID-19 Infection in People
Under Age 20: A Population-Based Analysis. Preprint. medRxiv
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.23.21260998v1.full
24. Smith C, Odd D, Harwood R, et al. Deaths in Children and Young People in England
following SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first pandemic year: a national study using
linked mandatory child death reporting data. Preprint. medRxiv 2021.07.07.21259779; doi:
https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.07.21259779
25. Ladhani SN, Ireland G, Baawuah F, et al. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Alpha (B.1.1.7)
variant, infection rates, antibody seroconversion and seroprevalence rates in secondary
school students and staff: active prospective surveillance, December 2020 to March 2021,
England. Preprint. medRxiv 2021.07.14.21260496; doi:
https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.14.21260496
26. Health Department-Reported Cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children
(MIS-C) in the United States. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#mis-national-
surveillance. Accessed August 30, 2021.
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
19
27. Molteni E, Sudre CH, Canas LS, et al. Illness duration and symptom profile in a large cohort
of symptomatic UK school-aged children tested for SARS-CoV-2. Illness duration and
symptom profile in symptomatic UK school-aged children tested for SARS-CoV-2. Lancet
Child Adolesc Health. 2021 Aug 3:S2352-4642(21)00198-X. doi: 10.1016/S2352-
4642(21)00198-X. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34358472.
28. Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFIs) for COVID-19 in Ontario: December 13,
2020 to August 14, 2021. Public Health Ontario. Available at:
https://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/health-topics/immunization/vaccine-safety. Accessed
August 22, 2021.
29. Gazit S, Shlezinger R, Perez G, et al. Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-
induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections. medRxiv.
2021.08.24.21262415
30. Barda N, Dagan N, Ben-Shlomo Y, et al. Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine
in a Nationwide Setting. NEJM. August 25, 2021. Accessed August 27, 2021. DOI:
10.1056/NEJMoa2110475
31. German panel gives limited approval for COVID-19 shot for adolescents. Available at
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/german-panel-gives-limited-approval-covid-19-shot-
adolescents-2021-06-10/ Accessed June 24, 2021.
32. Children and adolescents. -information about vaccination against COVID-19. Public Health
Agency of Sweden. Accessed August 5, 2021. https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/the-
public-health-agency-of-sweden/communicable-disease-control/covid-19/vaccination-
against-covid-19/children-and-adolescents--information-about-vaccination-against-covid-
19/#:~:text=In%20Sweden%2C%20vaccination%20against%20COVID,start%20sometime%
20in%20August%202021. Accessed August 5, 2021.
33. Plans to offer a vaccine to 16 and 17-year-olds. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/aktuelt/plans-
to-offer-a-vaccine-to-16-and-17-year-olds/id2865629/ Accessed August 22, 2021.
34. COVID-19 advice for the public: getting vaccinated. Available at
https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/covid-19-vaccines/advice
Accessed June 24, 2021.
35. Department of Health and Social Care, United Kingdom. JCVI statement on COVID-19
vaccination of children and young people aged 12 to 17 years: 15 July 2021. Published July
19, 2021. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccination-
of-children-and-young-people-aged-12-to-17-years-jcvi-statement/jvci-statement-on-covid-
19-vaccination-of-children-and-young-people-aged-12-to-17-years-15-july-2021 Accessed
August 2, 2021.
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
20
Figures
Figure 1. Cardiac Adverse Event (CAE) rate per million vaccinated persons, by age and sex and
vaccination dose
Figure 2. Total number of Cardiac Adverse Event (CAE) hospitalizations by age and sex
Figure 3. Median of Peak Troponin by age and sex in ng/mL
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
21
Figure 4. Symptom onset interval of Cardiac Adverse Events in days following vaccination
among recipients with elevated troponin, by age
Figure 5. Vaccine recipients with cardiac adverse events by vaccination dose
UNK= unknown
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
Females (n=25)
Males (n=232)
Dose 1 (95% CI)a
Dose 2 (95% CI)b
Dose 1 (95% CI)a
Dose 2 (95% CI)b
12-15 years
CAE Criteria met
0
8
22
100
Denominator*
1,834,687
616,511
1,834,687
616,511
CAE Rate per million
0
(0-0.20)
13.0
(5.6-25.6)
12.0
(7.51-18.2)
162.2
(132.0-197.3)
16-17 years
CAE Criteria met
3
14
12
98
Denominator*
1,471,878
1,042,863
1,471,878
1,042,863
CAE Rate per million
2.0
(0.42-5.96)
13.4
(7.34-22.5)
8.2
(4.21-14.2)
94.0
(76.3-114.5)
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
Low:
4/mill weekly,
68/mill 120-day
(Wk ending
7/24/21)*
Moderate:
15/mill weekly,
255/mill 120-day
(Wk ending
8/21/21)*
High:
21/mill weekly,
357/mill 120-day
(Wk ending
1/9/21)*
Hoeg, et al.*
Adj for incidental
admissions of 40%
7.1 26.7 37.3
At least 1 56.1 210.5 294.7
Adj for incidental
admissions of 40%
33.6 126.3 176.8 *Range is 94.0 (ages 16-17) to 162.2 (ages 12-15).
Number of
Comorbidities
None
11.8
44.4
62.2
Expected Risk-Adjusted 120-day Cumulative COVID-19
Hospitalizations per Million at Low, Moderate, and High
Weekly Prevalence
Vaccine-Associated Myocarditis
post dose 2 (boys only)
CDC Estimate
All Vaccinated
Children
94.0-162.2
66.7
*Source: CDC COVID-NET https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/COVIDNet/COVID19_3.html
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
1
Supplement 1: CDC working case definition for acute myocarditis
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
2
Supplement 2: Study Profile
Supplement 3. Pediatric COVID-19 hospitalization rates by age and week in the United States
from COVID-NET [8].
. CC-BY-ND 4.0 International licenseIt is made available under a
is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. (which was not certified by peer review) The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted September 8, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866doi: medRxiv preprint
... Myocardial inflammation and fibrosis have been welldocumented after coronavirus disease 2019 infection in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies [1]. Rare cases of cardiac inflammation following severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination have also been reported, mostly 2-5 days after the second vaccination [2][3][4][5]. The most affected population seems to be healthy male adolescents [2,6]. ...
... The most affected population seems to be healthy male adolescents [2,6]. The estimated rate varies widely, with the highest reported between 94 per million in 16-17-year-olds to 162.2 per million in 12-15-year-olds [5]. However, a generally accepted and more realistic estimated rate appears to be about 15 per million [7,8]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Rare cases of cardiac inflammation following vaccination for severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been reported. Objective To study paediatric patients with clinical findings of acute inflammation post coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in acute and subacute phases. Materials and methods We enrolled adolescents younger than 18 years who presented at one of two institutions between July 2021 and August 2022 with clinical and laboratory findings of acute myocarditis shortly following COVID-19 Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination. They all underwent cardiovascular MRI using the institutional myocarditis protocol. Results Five adolescents (four boys) underwent eight scans between 3 days and 109 days (mean 49 days) after the onset of symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination. Myocardial oedema appeared on short tau inversion recovery (STIR) T2-weighted images in three adolescents at presentation (3–12 days after symptom onset). In these children, the myocardial oedema/acute inflammation had resolved at follow-up cardiovascular MRI (53–68 days after first MRI). However, in all three adolescents, a persistent area of late gadolinium enhancement was evident at follow-up, suggesting post-myocarditic fibrosis. One adolescent scanned only once, 66 days after being symptomatic, had no acute inflammation but persistent fibrotic changes. This last adolescent, who underwent the first scan 109 days after symptom onset, had findings compatible with an episode of previous myocarditis, with mild ongoing regional myocardial oedema/inflammation. Conclusion This study on post-vaccine myocarditis demonstrates residual lesions with persistent areas of late gadolinium enhancement/myocardial fibrosis with ongoing myocardial oedema after resolution of the initial myocardial oedema a few weeks after Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination. There is an urgent need to recognise and fully investigate the outcome of post-vaccination myocarditis.
... Currently, two types of papers on post-COVID-vaccine myocarditis are represented in the literature. The first type usually presents the analysis of very large datasets with good epidemiology data but limited clinical information [25][26][27]. In a highly vaccinated Israeli population (almost exclusively with Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine), myocarditis cases were judged to be mild in 95%, but one fulminant case was fatal. ...
... The overall risk was higher after the second dose [3]. The analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) also indicated that post-vaccination myocarditis rate was highest in young boys aged 12-15 following the second dose of the mRNA vaccine [26]. The analysis of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California database yielded cases of myocarditis exclusively in males, and usually after the second dose [28]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Clinical course and outcomes of myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination remain variable. We retrospectively collected data on patients > 12 years old from 01/01/2021 to 12/30/2021 who received COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination and were diagnosed with myocarditis within 60 days of vaccination. Myocarditis cases were based on case definitions by authors. We report on 238 patients of whom most were male (n = 208; 87.1%). The mean age was 27.4 ± 16 (range 12–80) years. Females presented at older ages (41.3 ± 21.5 years) than men 25.7 ± 14 years (p = 0.001). In patients > 20 years of age, the mean duration from vaccination to symptoms was 4.8 days ± 5.5 days, but in < 20, it was 3.0 ± 3.3 days (p = 0.04). Myocarditis occurred most commonly after the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine (n = 183; 76.45) and after the second dose (n = 182; 80%). Symptoms started 3.95 ± 4.5 days after vaccination. The commonest symptom was chest pain (n = 221; 93%). Patients were treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n = 105; 58.3%), colchicine (n = 38; 21.1%), or glucocorticoids (n = 23; 12.7%). About 30% of the patients had left ventricular ejection fraction but more than half recovered the on repeat imaging. Abnormal cardiac MRIs were common; 168 patients (96% of 175 patients that had MRI) had late gadolinium enhancement, while 120 patients (68.5%) had myocardial edema. Heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy use was common (n = 27; 15%). Eleven patients had cardiogenic shock; and 4 patients required mechanical circulatory support. Five patients (1.7%) died; of these, 3 patients had endomyocardial biopsy/autopsy-confirmed myocarditis. Most cases of COVID-19 vaccine myocarditis are mild. Females presented at older ages than men and duration from vaccination to symptoms was longer in patients > 20 years. Cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support was seen and mortality was low. Future studies are needed to better evaluate risk factors, and long-term outcomes of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine myocarditis.
... Moreover, it is highlighted that severe adverse events' incidence rate can be so high to exceed the potential advantages of vaccination. In a study using data collected by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), it was reported that following mRNA vaccine administration the hospitalization rates of children aged 12-17 years due to cardiac adverse events was several times higher than those expected for COVID-19 in the same age group [30]. In addition, it is pointed out that health authorities have approved authorization of COVID-19 vaccines without third-party access to trial data and documents. ...
... The study cited by opponents has an important limitation that makes results highly debatable and inadequate to draw firm conclusions. It is based on VAERS reporting data that simply indicate any safety signal or unexpected pattern of vaccine-related adverse reactions, regardless of believed cause [30]. Information can be inaccurate, erroneous or unverified and do not allow to evaluate presence, prevalence, incidence, and severity of vaccine-related adverse events. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Despite the growing evidence of the extreme efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in adults and the elderly, the administration of the same prophylactic measures to pediatric subjects is debated by some parents and by a number of researchers. The aim of this manuscript is to explain the reasons for overcoming hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents and to highlight the importance of universal COVID-19 vaccination in the pediatric population. Main findings Recent epidemiological data suggest that the risk that a child with COVID-19 is hospitalized or admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit is greater than initially thought. Children may also suffer from long COVID and school closure because of COVID-19 can cause relevant mental health problems in the pediatric population. Placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, clinical trials showed appropriate efficacy, safety and tolerability of authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in children and adolescents 12–17 years old. Vaccination in children younger than 12 years of age will allow further benefits . Conclusions COVID-19 vaccine administration seems mandatory in all the children and adolescents because of COVID-19 related complications as well as the efficacy, safety and tolerability of COVID-19 vaccines in this population. Due to the recent approval of COVID-9 vaccines for children 5–10 years old, it is desirable that vaccine opponents can understand how important is the universal immunization against COVID-19 for the pediatric subjects.
... For question five, we present a summary of the mechanisms and a more descriptive 1) (question (Q)1=14; Q2=7; Q3=11; Q4=3; Q5=21; 10 studies contributed data to more than one question). Findings from 12 studies from the original review 15 were carried forward (Q1=5, [25][26][27][28][29] Q2=2, 29 30 Q3 part 2=10 25-28 31-36 ). From the search update, we identified 34 new reports across all questions (Q1= 9, 37-45 Q2=5, 37 41 45-47 Q3 part 1=1, 48 Q4=3, 39 49 50 Q5=21 9 51 -70 ). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives To synthesise evidence on incidence rates and risk factors for myocarditis and pericarditis after use of mRNA vaccination against covid-19, clinical presentation, short term and longer term outcomes of cases, and proposed mechanisms. Design Living evidence syntheses and review. Data sources Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from 6 October 2020 to 10 January 2022; reference lists and grey literature (to 13 January 2021). One reviewer completed screening and another verified 50% of exclusions, using a machine learning program to prioritise records. A second reviewer verified all exclusions at full text, extracted data, and (for incidence and risk factors) risk of bias assessments using modified Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Team consensus determined certainty of evidence ratings for incidence and risk factors using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Large (>10 000 participants) or population based or multisite observational studies and surveillance data (incidence and risk factors) reporting on confirmed myocarditis or pericarditis after covid-19 mRNA vaccination; case series (n≥5, presentation, short term clinical course and longer term outcomes); opinions, letters, reviews, and primary studies focused on describing or supporting hypothesised mechanisms. Results 46 studies were included (14 on incidence, seven on risk factors, 11 on characteristics and short term course, three on longer term outcomes, and 21 on mechanisms). Incidence of myocarditis after mRNA vaccines was highest in male adolescents and male young adults (age 12-17 years, range 50-139 cases per million (low certainty); 18-29 years, 28-147 per million (moderate certainty)). For girls and boys aged 5-11 years and women aged 18-29 years, incidence of myocarditis after vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) could be fewer than 20 cases per million (low certainty). Incidence after a third dose of an mRNA vaccine had very low certainty evidence. For individuals of 18-29 years, incidence of myocarditis is probably higher after vaccination with mRNA-1273 (Moderna) compared with Pfizer (moderate certainty). Among individuals aged 12-17, 18-29, or 18-39 years, incidence of myocarditis or pericarditis after dose two of an mRNA vaccine for covid-19 might be lower when administered ≥31 days compared with ≤30 days after dose one (low certainty). Data specific to men aged 18-29 years indicated that the dosing interval might need to increase to ≥56 days to substantially drop myocarditis or pericarditis incidence. For clinical course and short term outcomes, only one small case series (n=8) was found for 5-11 year olds. In adolescents and adults, most (>90%) myocarditis cases involved men of a median 20-30 years of age and with symptom onset two to four days after a second dose (71-100%). Most people were admitted to hospital (≥84%) for a short duration (two to four days). For pericarditis, data were limited but more variation than myocarditis has been reported in patient age, sex, onset timing, and rate of admission to hospital. Three case series with longer term (3 months; n=38) follow-up suggested persistent echocardiogram abnormalities, as well as ongoing symptoms or a need for drug treatments or restriction from activities in >50% of patients. Sixteen hypothesised mechanisms were described, with little direct supporting or refuting evidence. Conclusions These findings indicate that adolescent and young adult men are at the highest risk of myocarditis after mRNA vaccination. Use of a Pfizer vaccine over a Moderna vaccine and waiting for more than 30 days between doses might be preferred for this population. Incidence of myocarditis in children aged 5-11 years is very rare but certainty was low. Data for clinical risk factors were very limited. A clinical course of mRNA related myocarditis appeared to be benign, although longer term follow-up data were limited. Prospective studies with appropriate testing (eg, biopsy and tissue morphology) will enhance understanding of mechanism.
... Some vaccine-induced AEs (e.g., myocardial infarction, Guillain-Barré syndrome) were found to increase with age, while others (e.g., myocarditis, anaphylaxis, appendicitis) were more common in younger people [35,36]. Although myocarditis cases are rather rare, in a study of US military personnel the number was higher than expected among males after a second vaccine dose [37]; similarly, the rate of postvaccination cardiac AEs was higher in young boys following the second dose [38,39]. Finally, a recent study showed an increased risk of neurological complications in COVID-19 vaccine recipients (which was nevertheless lower than the risk in COVID-19 patients) [34]. ...
Article
Vaccination is a major tool for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic and mRNA vaccines are central to the ongoing vaccination campaign that is undoubtedly saving thousands of lives. However, adverse effects (AEs) following vaccination have been noted which may relate to a pro-inflammatory action of the employed lipid nanoparticles or the delivered mRNA (i.e., vaccines formulation) as well as to the herein discussed unique nature, expression pattern, binding profile and pro-inflammatory effects of the produced antigens (S protein and/or its subunits-peptide fragments) in human tissues/organs. Current knowledge on this topic mostly originates from cell-based assays or from model organisms, therefore further research on the cellular-molecular basis of the mRNA vaccines induced AEs, will guarantee safety, maintain trust, and direct health policies.
... Čini se da su najizloženiji dječaci i mladi muškarci. Jedno zasad još nerecenzirano (slabokvalitetno) istraživanje pokazalo je da zdravi dječaci od 12 do 15 godina starosti imaju između tri i šest puta veći rizik od razvijanja kardiovaskularnih poremećaja nakon cijepljenja protiv covid-19 nego što im je rizik od hospitalizacije zbog covid-19 [463]. Jedna je analiza javno dostupnih podataka o spontanom javljanju štetnih događaja povezanih s cjepivima pokazala da je već u prvih nekoliko tjedana nakon početka distribucije cjepiva među adolescentima između 12 i 15 godina rizik od miokarditisa bio povećan 19 puta u usporedbi s onime što bi se očekivalo s ostalim cjepivima [461]. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
U hrvatskim je medijima sve više govora o cijepljenju djece protiv covid-19, unatoč maloj ulozi djece u prijenosu novog koronavirusa i njihovom malom riziku od teških simptoma, postojanju drugih oblika prevencije, činjenici da klinička ispitivanja nisu dovršena, raznih problema u provedenim ispitivanjima i rastućoj zabrinutosti oko sigurnosti cjepiva i mogućih štetnih učinaka. Cilj je ovog kratkog pregleda odabrane znanstvene literature potaknuti kvalitetnu javnu raspravu prije donošenja potencijalno ishitrenih odluka.
Thesis
Full-text available
This dissertation explores the idea and ethics of vaccination for the sake of others. It conceptually distinguishes four different kinds of vaccination—self-protective, paternalistic, altruistic, and indirect—based on who receives the primary benefits of vaccination and who ultimately makes the vaccination decision. It describes the results of focus group studies that were conducted to investigate what people who might get vaccinated altruistically think of this idea. It also applies the different kinds of vaccination to ethical issues surrounding COVID-19, such as lockdown measures, routine or mandatory vaccination of healthy children, and the ethical justification of restrictive measures for unvaccinated people. A more general philosophical account of vaccination ethics is ultimately developed, which is based not on moral duties, but on the moral reasons that people may have to get vaccinated for the sake of others. It is argued that such reasons may be stronger or weaker, depending on various factors related to the vaccines in question and the specific epidemiological circumstances.
Article
The paper considers whether the British Government could make receiving a COVID-19 vaccine effectively legally mandatory. After considering the position in English law, it considers the ethical position regarding involuntary vaccination, and concludes that while there is no legal impediment to such a requirement, it is ethically unsound.
Preprint
Full-text available
Objectives: Myocarditis and pericarditis are adverse events of special interest after vaccination with mRNA vaccines. This rapid systematic review examined incidence rates of myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination, and the presentation and clinical course of cases. Design: Rapid systematic review Data sources: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched from October 2020 to October 6, 2021; reference lists and grey literature (to Oct 21, 2021). Review methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and large population-based/multisite observational studies and surveillance data reporting on myocarditis or pericarditis in people of any age after receiving any COVID-19 vaccine; systematic reviews of case series. A single reviewer completed screening and another verified 50% of exclusions, using a machine-learning program to prioritize records. A second reviewer verified all exclusions at full text, data extractions, and (for incidence) risk of bias assessments using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Certainty of evidence ratings for incidence were based on team consensus using GRADE. Patient partners provided key messages from their interpretations of the findings. Results: 3457 titles/abstracts and 159 full texts were screened. For incidence rates we included 7 RCTs (n=3732 to 44,325) and 22 large observational studies/data sources using passive (n=10) and active (n=12) surveillance; for case presentation, we included 11 case series published as articles and three based on publicly available websites (n=12,636 cases). Mainly due to imprecision, the RCTs provided very low certainty evidence for incidence of myocarditis or pericarditis. From observational data, the incidence of myocarditis following mRNA vaccines is low but probably highest in males 12-17 years (55 [7-day risk] to 134 [30-day risk] cases per million; specific to Pfizer) and 18-29 years (40 [7-day risk] to 99 [21-30 day risk]) cases per million) (Moderate certainty evidence). Incidence is lower (<20 per million) or little-to-none in older ages and across all ages of females (Low certainty). Evidence for pericarditis was of very low certainty. Among adult males under 40 years, Moderna compared with Pfizer vaccine may be associated with a small increase (<20 per million) in risk for myocarditis or (one of) myocarditis or pericarditis following vaccination (Low certainty); the evidence for youth under 18 years was very uncertain. No study examined differences in incidence based on pre-existing condition(s) or risk factors apart from age and sex. The majority of myocarditis cases involved males (often >90%) in their 20s, with a short symptom onset of 2 to 4 days after a second dose (71-100%). The majority of cases presented with chest pain/pressure and troponin elevation; a minority (<30%) had left ventricular dysfunction. Most were hospitalized (≥84%), without stays in intensive care units, for a short duration (2-4 d) and treated with anti-inflammatory and/or other supportive therapies. Almost all reports of death are from unverified cases and of unclear cause. Most cases of pericarditis were unconfirmed; for this outcome there appears to be more variation in age, sex, onset timing and rate of hospitalization. Conclusions: Incidence of myocarditis following mRNA vaccines is low but probably highest in males 12-29 years old. Existing evidence does not strongly support preference of one mRNA vaccine, even in young males. Continued active surveillance of myocarditis incidence out to 30 days from dosing is recommended with respect to i) new populations (i.e., children <12y), ii) third and subsequent doses, and iii) affected individuals receiving subsequent mRNA vaccine doses. Future research is needed to examine other risk factors and long-term effects.
Preprint
Full-text available
La présente note a pour but de faire le point sur l’efficacité de l’immunité post-infectieuse (ou naturelle) acquise par les convalescents du Covid, et sur la pertinence de leur vaccination. Les dernières recommandations de la Haute Autorité de Santé concluent à l’intérêt de vacciner les convalescents à 6 mois de l’infection. Elles se basent essentiellement sur des études biologiques, qui ne sont pas nécessairement corrélées à la protection effectivement acquise sur le terrain. Elles n’évaluent pas non plus de balance des risques propre à la vaccination des convalescents. Notre recension critique des études épidémiologiques réalisées jusqu’ici montre que l’immunité naturelle s’avère particulièrement efficace (aussi bien contre le risque d’infection que contre le risque de forme symptomatique ou sévère), durable (à plus d’un an), et robuste (face au variant Delta). L’efficacité de l’immunité naturelle, au moins comparable à celle de l’immunité artificielle post-vaccinale à court terme (4 mois), se montre supérieure à moyen et long terme. La plupart des protocoles ont en outre tendance à sous-estimer l’efficacité de l’immunité post-infectieuse et à surestimer celle de l’immunité post-vaccinale. Les données cliniques actuelles ne permettent pas de déterminer une balance des risques qui soit assurément favorable à la vaccination des convalescents. Dans le cadre d’une vaccination qui demeure expérimentale, la rigueur la plus élémentaire, aussi bien scientifique que clinique et morale, voudrait donc que l’on s’abstienne de vacciner plus avant les convalescents du Covid — et que l’on s’abstienne de supprimer les témoins.
Article
Full-text available
Importance The BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine was authorized on May 10, 2021, for emergency use in children aged 12 years and older. Initial reports showed that the vaccine was well tolerated without serious adverse events; however, cases of myocarditis have been reported since approval. Objective To review results of comprehensive cardiac imaging in children with myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccine. Design, Setting, and Participants This study was a case series of children younger than 19 years hospitalized with myocarditis within 30 days of BNT162b2 messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine. The setting was a single-center pediatric referral facility, and admissions occurred between May 1 and July 15, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures All patients underwent cardiac evaluation including an electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Results Fifteen patients (14 male patients [93%]; median age, 15 years [range, 12-18 years]) were hospitalized for management of myocarditis after receiving the BNT162b2 (Pfizer) vaccine. Symptoms started 1 to 6 days after receipt of the vaccine and included chest pain in 15 patients (100%), fever in 10 patients (67%), myalgia in 8 patients (53%), and headache in 6 patients (40%). Troponin levels were elevated in all patients at admission (median, 0.25 ng/mL [range, 0.08-3.15 ng/mL]) and peaked 0.1 to 2.3 days after admission. By echocardiographic examination, decreased left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) was present in 3 patients (20%), and abnormal global longitudinal or circumferential strain was present in 5 patients (33%). No patient had a pericardial effusion. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings were consistent with myocarditis in 13 patients (87%) including late gadolinium enhancement in 12 patients (80%), regional hyperintensity on T2-weighted imaging in 2 patients (13%), elevated extracellular volume fraction in 3 patients (20%), and elevated LV global native T1 in 2 patients (20%). No patient required intensive care unit admission, and median hospital length of stay was 2 days (range 1-5). At follow-up 1 to 13 days after hospital discharge, 11 patients (73%) had resolution of symptoms. One patient (7%) had persistent borderline low LV systolic function on echocardiogram (EF 54%). Troponin levels remained mildly elevated in 3 patients (20%). One patient (7%) had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on ambulatory monitor. Conclusions and Relevance In this small case series study, myocarditis was diagnosed in children after COVID-19 vaccination, most commonly in boys after the second dose. In this case series, in short-term follow-up, patients were mildly affected. The long-term risks associated with postvaccination myocarditis remain unknown. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to inform recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination in this population.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background In England, the rapid spread of the SARS-Cov-2 Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant from November 2020 led to national lockdown, including school closures in January 2021. We assessed SARS-CoV-2 infection, seroprevalence and seroconversion in students and staff when secondary schools reopened in March 2021. Methods Public Health England initiated SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in 18 secondary schools across six regions in September 2020. Participants provided nasal swabs for RT-PCR and blood samples for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at the beginning (September 2020) and end (December 2020) of the autumn term and at the start of the spring term (March 2021). Findings In March 2021, 1895 participants (1100 students, 795 staff) were tested; 5.6% (61/1094) students and 4.4% (35/792) staff had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between December 2020 and March 2021. Nucleoprotein antibody seroprevalence was 36.3% (370/1018) in students and 31.9% (245/769) in staff, while spike protein antibody prevalence was 39.5% (402/1018) and 59.8% (459/769), respectively, similar to regional community seroprevalence. Between December 2020 and March 2021 (median 15.9 weeks), 14.8% (97/656; 95% CI: 12.2-17.7) students and 10.0% (59/590; 95% CI: 7.7-12.7) staff seroconverted. Weekly seroconversion rates were similar from September to December 2020 (8.0/1000) and from December 2020 to March 2021 (7.9/1000; students: 9.3/1,000; staff: 6.3/1,000). Interpretation By March 2021, a third of secondary school students and staff had serological evidence of prior infection based on N-antibody seropositivity, and an additional third of staff had evidence of vaccine-induced immunity based on S-antibody seropositivity. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of the Delta variant.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background Deaths in children and young people (CYP) following SARS-CoV-2 infection are rare. Quantifying the risk of mortality is challenging because of high relative prevalence of asymptomatic and non-specific disease manifestations. Therefore, it is important to differentiate between CYP who have died of SARS-CoV-2 and those who have died of an alternative disease process but coincidentally tested positive. Methods During the pandemic, the mandatory National Child Mortality Database (NCMD) was linked to Public Health England (PHE) testing data to identify CYP (<18 years) who died with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. A clinical review of all deaths from March 2020 to February 2021 was undertaken to differentiate between those who died of SARS-CoV-2 infection and those who died of an alternative cause but coincidentally tested positive. Then, using linkage to national hospital admission data, demographic and comorbidity details of CYP who died of SARS-CoV-2 were compared to all other deaths. Absolute risk of death was estimated where denominator data were available. Findings 3105 CYP died from all causes during the first pandemic year in England. 61 of these deaths occurred in CYP who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. 25 CYP died of SARS-CoV-2 infection; 22 from acute infection and three from PIMS-TS. 99.995% of CYP with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test survived. The 25 CYP who died of SARS-CoV-2 equates to a mortality rate of 2/million for the 12,023,568 CYP living in England. CYP >10 years, of Asian and Black ethnic backgrounds, and with comorbidities were over-represented compared to other children. Interpretation SARS-CoV-2 is very rarely fatal in CYP, even among those with underlying comorbidities. These findings are important to guide families, clinicians and policy makers about future shielding and vaccination.
Article
Full-text available
Importance Myocarditis is a leading cause of sudden death in competitive athletes. Myocardial inflammation is known to occur with SARS-CoV-2. Different screening approaches for detection of myocarditis have been reported. The Big Ten Conference requires comprehensive cardiac testing including cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for all athletes with COVID-19, allowing comparison of screening approaches. Objective To determine the prevalence of myocarditis in athletes with COVID-19 and compare screening strategies for safe return to play. Design, Setting, and Participants Big Ten COVID-19 Cardiac Registry principal investigators were surveyed for aggregate observational data from March 1, 2020, through December 15, 2020, on athletes with COVID-19. For athletes with myocarditis, presence of cardiac symptoms and details of cardiac testing were recorded. Myocarditis was categorized as clinical or subclinical based on the presence of cardiac symptoms and CMR findings. Subclinical myocarditis classified as probable or possible myocarditis based on other testing abnormalities. Myocarditis prevalence across universities was determined. The utility of different screening strategies was evaluated. Exposures SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction testing. Main Outcome and Measure Myocarditis via cardiovascular diagnostic testing. Results Representing 13 universities, cardiovascular testing was performed in 1597 athletes (964 men [60.4%]). Thirty-seven (including 27 men) were diagnosed with COVID-19 myocarditis (overall 2.3%; range per program, 0%-7.6%); 9 had clinical myocarditis and 28 had subclinical myocarditis. If cardiac testing was based on cardiac symptoms alone, only 5 athletes would have been detected (detected prevalence, 0.31%). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for all athletes yielded a 7.4-fold increase in detection of myocarditis (clinical and subclinical). Follow-up CMR imaging performed in 27 (73.0%) demonstrated resolution of T2 elevation in all (100%) and late gadolinium enhancement in 11 (40.7%). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of 1597 US competitive athletes with CMR screening after COVID-19 infection, 37 athletes (2.3%) were diagnosed with clinical and subclinical myocarditis. Variability was observed in prevalence across universities, and testing protocols were closely tied to the detection of myocarditis. Variable ascertainment and unknown implications of CMR findings underscore the need for standardized timing and interpretation of cardiac testing. These unique CMR imaging data provide a more complete understanding of the prevalence of clinical and subclinical myocarditis in college athletes after COVID-19 infection. The role of CMR in routine screening for athletes safe return to play should be explored further.
Article
Full-text available
Importance Solid estimates of the risk of developing symptoms and of progressing to critical disease in individuals infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are key to interpreting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) dynamics, identifying the settings and the segments of the population where transmission is more likely to remain undetected, and defining effective control strategies. Objective To estimate the association of age with the likelihood of developing symptoms and the association of age with the likelihood of progressing to critical illness after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study analyzed quarantined case contacts, identified between February 20 and April 16, 2020, in the Lombardy region of Italy. Contacts were monitored daily for symptoms and tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection, by either real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction using nasopharyngeal swabs or retrospectively via IgG serological assays. Close contacts of individuals with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were selected as those belonging to clusters (ie, groups of contacts associated with an index case) where all individuals were followed up for symptoms and tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were analyzed from February to June 2020. Exposure Close contact with individuals with confirmed COVID-19 cases as identified by contact tracing operations. Main Outcomes and Measures Age-specific estimates of the risk of developing respiratory symptoms or fever greater than or equal to 37.5 °C and of experiencing critical disease (defined as requiring intensive care or resulting in death) in SARS-CoV-2–infected case contacts. Results In total, 5484 case contacts (median [interquartile range] age, 50 [30-61] years; 3086 female contacts [56.3%]) were analyzed, 2824 of whom (51.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (median [interquartile range] age, 53 [34-64] years; 1604 female contacts [56.8%]). The proportion of infected persons who developed symptoms ranged from 18.1% (95% CI, 13.9%-22.9%) among participants younger than 20 years to 64.6% (95% CI, 56.6%-72.0%) for those aged 80 years or older. Most infected contacts (1948 of 2824 individuals [69.0%]) did not develop respiratory symptoms or fever greater than or equal to 37.5 °C. Only 26.1% (95% CI, 24.1%-28.2%) of infected individuals younger than 60 years developed respiratory symptoms or fever greater than or equal to 37.5 °C; among infected participants older than 60 years, 6.6% (95% CI, 5.1%-8.3%) developed critical disease. Female patients were 52.7% (95% CI, 24.4%-70.7%) less likely than male patients to develop critical disease after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusions and Relevance In this Italian cohort study of close contacts of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, more than one-half of individuals tested positive for the virus. However, most infected individuals did not develop respiratory symptoms or fever. The low proportion of children and young adults who developed symptoms highlights the possible challenges in readily identifying SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Article
Background Preapproval trials showed that messenger RNA (mRNA)–based vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had a good safety profile, yet these trials were subject to size and patient-mix limitations. An evaluation of the safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine with respect to a broad range of potential adverse events is needed. Methods We used data from the largest health care organization in Israel to evaluate the safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. For each potential adverse event, in a population of persons with no previous diagnosis of that event, we individually matched vaccinated persons to unvaccinated persons according to sociodemographic and clinical variables. Risk ratios and risk differences at 42 days after vaccination were derived with the use of the Kaplan–Meier estimator. To place these results in context, we performed a similar analysis involving SARS-CoV-2–infected persons matched to uninfected persons. The same adverse events were studied in the vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection analyses. Results In the vaccination analysis, the vaccinated and control groups each included a mean of 884,828 persons. Vaccination was most strongly associated with an elevated risk of myocarditis (risk ratio, 3.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55 to 12.44; risk difference, 2.7 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 1.0 to 4.6), lymphadenopathy (risk ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 2.05 to 2.78; risk difference, 78.4 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 64.1 to 89.3), appendicitis (risk ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.01; risk difference, 5.0 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 0.3 to 9.9), and herpes zoster infection (risk ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.73; risk difference, 15.8 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 8.2 to 24.2). SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a substantially increased risk of myocarditis (risk ratio, 18.28; 95% CI, 3.95 to 25.12; risk difference, 11.0 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 5.6 to 15.8) and of additional serious adverse events, including pericarditis, arrhythmia, deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions In this study in a nationwide mass vaccination setting, the BNT162b2 vaccine was not associated with an elevated risk of most of the adverse events examined. The vaccine was associated with an excess risk of myocarditis (1 to 5 events per 100,000 persons). The risk of this potentially serious adverse event and of many other serious adverse events was substantially increased after SARS-CoV-2 infection. (Funded by the Ivan and Francesca Berkowitz Family Living Laboratory Collaboration at Harvard Medical School and Clalit Research Institute.)
Article
Importance Myocarditis has been reported with COVID-19 but is not clearly recognized as a possible adverse event following COVID-19 vaccination. Objective To describe myocarditis presenting after COVID-19 vaccination within the Military Health System. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective case series studied patients within the US Military Health System who experienced myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination between January and April 2021. Patients who sought care for chest pain following COVID-19 vaccination and were subsequently diagnosed with clinical myocarditis were included. Exposure Receipt of a messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine between January 1 and April 30, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical diagnosis of myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination in the absence of other identified causes. Results A total of 23 male patients (22 currently serving in the military and 1 retiree; median [range] age, 25 [20-51] years) presented with acute onset of marked chest pain within 4 days after receipt of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. All military members were previously healthy with a high level of fitness. Seven received the BNT162b2-mRNA vaccine and 16 received the mRNA-1273 vaccine. A total of 20 patients had symptom onset following the second dose of an appropriately spaced 2-dose series. All patients had significantly elevated cardiac troponin levels. Among 8 patients who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging within the acute phase of illness, all had findings consistent with the clinical diagnosis of myocarditis. Additional testing did not identify other etiologies for myocarditis, including acute COVID-19 and other infections, ischemic injury, or underlying autoimmune conditions. All patients received brief supportive care and were recovered or recovering at the time of this report. The military administered more than 2.8 million doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in this period. While the observed number of myocarditis cases was small, the number was higher than expected among male military members after a second vaccine dose. Conclusions and Relevance In this case series, myocarditis occurred in previously healthy military patients with similar clinical presentations following receipt of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Further surveillance and evaluation of this adverse event following immunization is warranted. Potential for rare vaccine-related adverse events must be considered in the context of the well-established risk of morbidity, including cardiac injury, following COVID-19 infection.
Article
Background Until very recently, vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had not been authorized for emergency use in persons younger than 16 years of age. Safe, effective vaccines are needed to protect this population, facilitate in-person learning and socialization, and contribute to herd immunity. Methods In this ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded trial, we randomly assigned participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive two injections, 21 days apart, of 30 μg of BNT162b2 or placebo. Noninferiority of the immune response to BNT162b2 in 12-to-15-year-old participants as compared with that in 16-to-25-year-old participants was an immunogenicity objective. Safety (reactogenicity and adverse events) and efficacy against confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19; onset, ≥7 days after dose 2) in the 12-to-15-year-old cohort were assessed. Results Overall, 2260 adolescents 12 to 15 years of age received injections; 1131 received BNT162b2, and 1129 received placebo. As has been found in other age groups, BNT162b2 had a favorable safety and side-effect profile, with mainly transient mild-to-moderate reactogenicity (predominantly injection-site pain [in 79 to 86% of participants], fatigue [in 60 to 66%], and headache [in 55 to 65%]); there were no vaccine-related serious adverse events and few overall severe adverse events. The geometric mean ratio of SARS-CoV-2 50% neutralizing titers after dose 2 in 12-to-15-year-old participants relative to 16-to-25-year-old participants was 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47 to 2.10), which met the noninferiority criterion of a lower boundary of the two-sided 95% confidence interval greater than 0.67 and indicated a greater response in the 12-to-15-year-old cohort. Among participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, no Covid-19 cases with an onset of 7 or more days after dose 2 were noted among BNT162b2 recipients, and 16 cases occurred among placebo recipients. The observed vaccine efficacy was 100% (95% CI, 75.3 to 100). Conclusions The BNT162b2 vaccine in 12-to-15-year-old recipients had a favorable safety profile, produced a greater immune response than in young adults, and was highly effective against Covid-19. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; C4591001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)
Article
Objectives: Pediatric hospitalization rates are used as a marker of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease severity in children but may be inflated by the detection of mild or asymptomatic infection via universal screening. We aimed to classify COVID-19 hospitalizations using an existing and novel approach and to assess the interrater reliability of both approaches. Methods: This retrospective cohort study characterized severity of illness and likelihood of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection as the cause of hospitalization in pediatric patients <18 years of age. Subjects had positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal testing or were diagnosed with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and were hospitalized between May 10, 2020 (when universal screening of all admissions began) and February 10, 2021, at a university-based, quaternary care children's hospital in Northern California. Hospitalizations were categorized as either likely or unlikely to be caused by SARS-CoV-2 (novel approach), and disease severity was categorized according to previously published classification of disease severity. Results: Of 117 hospitalizations, 46 (39.3%) were asymptomatic, 33 (28.2%) had mild to moderate disease, 9 (7.7%) had severe illness, and 15 (12.8%) had critical illness (weighted κ: 0.82). A total of 14 (12%) patients had multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. A total of 53 (45%) admissions were categorized as unlikely to be caused by SARS-CoV-2 (κ: 0.78). Conclusions: Although COVID-19 has considerable associated morbidity and mortality in children, reported hospitalization rates likely lead to overestimation of the true disease burden.
Article
Objectives: Define the spectrum of disease in pediatric inpatients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result in a manner relevant to pediatric hospital medicine. Methods: Retrospective case series of all patients aged <22 years hospitalized at our institution with a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction test result between May 1, 2020, and September 30, 2020. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. Results: Three distinct presentations were associated with acute SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Patients had incidental infection (40%), were potentially symptomatic (47%), or were significantly symptomatic (14%). The average length of stay differed between the significantly symptomatic group and the incidental and potentially symptomatic groups (P =.002). Average age differed among these groups, with significantly symptomatic patients older by >2 years. Fifty-five percent of incidental and 47% of potentially symptomatic patients had at least 1 identified comorbidity, whereas 90% of significantly symptomatic patients had at least 1 (P = .01). There was a significant relationship between obesity (P = .001) and asthma (P = .004) and severe disease. Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference between groups with respect to fever, hypoxia, supplemXental oxygen use, duration of supplemental oxygen, and ICU admission, with a significantly higher percentage of patients in the significantly symptomatic group meeting each of these criteria (P < .001 for all categories). Conclusions: Pediatric patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 fall into distinct categories, which are critical to understanding the true pathology of SARS-Cov-2 as it relates to hospitalized pediatric patients. Most hospitalized patients who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic or have a reason for hospitalization other than coronavirus disease 2019.