Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ucmg20
Effects of Decline in Fish Landings on the
Livelihoods of Coastal Communities in Central
Region of Ghana
Jones Abrefa Danquah, Charity Odumale Roberts & Mark Appiah
To cite this article: Jones Abrefa Danquah, Charity Odumale Roberts & Mark Appiah (2021):
Effects of Decline in Fish Landings on the Livelihoods of Coastal Communities in Central Region of
Ghana, Coastal Management, DOI: 10.1080/08920753.2021.1967562
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2021.1967562
Published online: 29 Aug 2021.
Submit your article to this journal
View related articles
View Crossmark data
Effects of Decline in Fish Landings on the Livelihoods of
Coastal Communities in Central Region of Ghana
Jones Abrefa Danquaha, Charity Odumale Robertsb and Mark Appiahc
aDepartment of Geography and Regional Planning, Faculty of Social Sciences, College of Humanities
and Legal Studies, University of Cape Coast, Ghana; bDepartment of Languages and General Studies,
University of Energy and Natural Resources, P.O. Box 214 Sunyani, Ghana; cCSIR-Forestry Research
Institute of Ghana, P.O Box UP 63, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana
Fishing along Ghana’s coast is the main livelihood for local commu-
nities, and it contributes significantly to their incomes. Most of them
get employment, food security, and access to better health care
through fishing activities. However, the fishing industry has been
saddled with many challenges in recent times, which has led to low
landings. This study aimed to assess the causes and effects of the
decline in fish landings on the livelihood of coastal communities in
the Central Region of Ghana. The systematic sampling technique was
used to randomly select 200 households from four communities. A
questionnaire was designed to elicit information from fisherfolk based
on Likert scale estimation. In addition, time-series data of fish landings
and imports for 51 years (1976–2017) was used in the analysis. The
results from the study indicate that fish landings are declining, and
this is affecting the income levels of fisherfolk. However, the impact
of income decline on the female fisherfolk is lower as compared to
their male counterparts. To mitigate against dwindling incomes, the
fisherfolk have adopted livelihood diversification coping strategies.
The key livelihood options identified in the communities are masonry,
trading, and commercial driving. The fisherfolk mentioned overfishing,
pollution, use of smaller mesh size nets, and unapproved methods
of fishing as drivers of decline in fish landings. This study recommends
that mandated institutions with oversight responsibilities in the fish-
ing industry should be strengthened to enable them to conduct their
functions effectively, so, they halt the decline in fish catch.
Fishing in Ghana, like in many other fishing countries, plays a major role in the
sustainable livelihoods of many coastal communities (Asiedu and Nunoo 2013). Fish
productivity is a key component of food security at both local and global scales and
contributes to domestic food security and self-sufficiency, although this objective may
© 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
CONTACT Jones Abrefa Danquah email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org Department of Geography
and Regional Planning, Faculty of Social Sciences, College of Humanities and Legal Studies, University of Cape Coast,
Cape Coast, Ghana
artisanal shing; coping
strategies; sherfolk; sh
2 J. A. DANQUAH ET AL.
conflict with the desire to earn foreign exchange (FAO 2016). It has been estimated
that between 93 and 97 million rural households in developing countries are either
directly or indirectly involved in fishing or the processing and marketing of small-scale
fisheries (Amevenku, Asravor, and Kuwornu 2019). The coastline of Ghana is about
five hundred and fifty (550 km) kilometers in length, stretching from Aflao in the East
to Half Assin in the West (Dadson, Owusu, and Adams 2016). The coastal zone covers
6.5% of the land area and is inhabited by a quarter of Ghana’s population
(DeGraff-Johnson et al. 2010). The great majority of these coastal dwellers have their
livelihoods directly or indirectly tied to the artisanal fishing industry. The fishing
industry, which contributed about 7% to Ghana’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in
the 1970s, declined to 4.5% in 2009 and further declined to its present levels of 1.1%
by 2016 (World Bank 2010; FAO 2016). This decline has been attributed to a combi-
nation of many factors, namely: overcapacity, illegal fishing methods, obsolete fishing
gear, poorly defined legal and institutional framework, ambiguous policies, weak insti-
tutions to ensure compliance of management requirements in the semi-industrial and
industrial fishing, climate change, and general open-access nature of fishing resources
along the Gulf of Guinea (Cobbina 2018; Akpalu, Eriksen, and Vondolia 2018; Lazar
et al. 2018; Hasselberg et al. 2020; Adom, Sekyere, and Yarney 2019) . The artisanal
canoe fishery sub-sector is limited by several factors, including the fact that sizable
catches occur only for three months (usually July-September), particularly for small
pelagic fishery leading to minimal monthly incomes from fishing (Dovlo, Amador,
and Nkrumah 2016) during the rest of the year. The peak population and reproductive
cycles of the pelagic fish depend on the major upwelling(food) movement of the sea,
which coincides with these three months in the year during the fishing season
(Atindana, Ofori-Danson and Brucet 2019; Nunoo et al. 2015) . The small pelagic fish
(e.g., Engraulis encrasicolus, Scomber japonicus, Sardinella maderensis, Sardinella aurita,
Trachurus trachurus, and Decapterus punctatus) constitute major catch of artisanal
canoe fishery (Nunoo et al. 2015) . The pelagic fish account for about 80% of total
marine fish caught in the country annually(Cobbina 2018; Lazar et al. 2018). The
small pelagic fish is important to artisanal canoe fishery, coastal economies, nutrition,
and food security, hence, they are described as the “people’s fish” (Hasselberg et al.
2020; Yamoah 2018). Marine stocks are overexploited by the industrial and semi-industrial
fleets leading to a decline of harvests from marine fisheries. For instance, between
2000-2013, marine fish production decline by 17%, according to the Ministry of
Fisheries and Aquaculture Development (Rurangwa et al. 2015). Fishing communities
along the coast in Ghana have benefited from the products and produce of fishing
over the years. However, the fishing industry has been saddled with some challenges,
including the high cost of fishing inputs, lack of capital, use of unsustainable methods
of fishing, and increased prices of petroleum products used for fishing. Although,
premix fuel and outboard motors used in the artisanal fishery industry are highly
subsidized. However, the administration of premix fuel has significant political influ-
ence, with members of a political party in power benefiting more from fuel diversion
(Akpalu, Eriksen, and Vondolia 2018). All these factors have led to the decline in the
fish catch (Nunoo et al. 2015; Dovlo, Amador, and Nkrumah 2016; Asiedu, Afriyie,
and Amponsah 2018). The use of unapproved fishing methods, overcapacity, and
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 3
noncompliance to regulations and policy directives have also contributed to the decline
in fish catch which affects the livelihood and income levels of fisher folks in the
coastal communities. This study assesses the economic effects of reduced fish catch
on households and their level of understanding of the underlined causes, as well as
available livelihood coping strategies at their disposal.
The interwoven nature of livelihood to the environment creates a delicate unstable
balance (Dai et al. 2019). As a result, any activity that causes degradation of fishing
resource stock directly affects the livelihood of the fisherfolk. Climate change and
other non-climatic stressors continue to impact the livelihoods of fishing communities
along the coast (Freduah, Fidelman, and Smith 2019). Coastal communities are sensitive
to several climatic events, biological, institutional, social, cultural, economic, anthro-
pogenic perturbations, and political stressors, making them more vulnerable because
of their dependence on fisheries for livelihood (Freduah, Fidelman, and Smith 2019;
Huynh et al. 2021). The livelihood framework provides a comprehensive and systematic
approach to the understanding of how fishing communities eke a living (Dinku 2018).
Chambers and Conway(1992) defined livelihoods as “the capabilities, assets, and activ-
ities required for a means of living”.
The conceptualized livelihood framework adopted in this study primarily consists
of eight components (Figure 1) (Ellis 1998; Scoones 2005, 2009; Freduah, Fidelman,
and Smith 2019, Dai et al. 2019; Ayana, Megento, and Kussa 2021). Vulnerability in
the context of fishing communities is the degree to which the fishing industry is
susceptible to adverse effects of climate change and other non-climatic shocks (Huynh
et al. 2021). The vulnerability of the fishing communities to both internal and external
stressors is the function of exposure and sensitivity to shocks. Exposure and sensitivity
always interact together to describe the characteristics of the fisherfolk to climatic and
non-climatic stressors. The degree of vulnerability is a reflection of livelihood strategies.
Adaptive capacity in the context of livelihood assets are the key components of capitals
(human, physical, social, natural, and financial) that can be mobilized by the fisherfolk
to strengthen their adaptation or adjust to the effects of climate and non-climate
stressors on their livelihoods (Freduah, Fidelman, and Smith 2019). The adaptive
capacity of fisherfolk is the total socioecological, economic, political, and biophysical
environment in which they operate (Smit and Wandel 2006). Adaptive capacity is a
reflection of fisherfolk’s capital stocks (Smit and Pilifosova 2003). Access to these
resources is the core component of the adaptive capacity of the fisherfolk (Jakku and
Lynam 2010). Livelihood assets (capital stocks) constitute diverse resources available
to fisher communities or fisherfolk that can be converted into income or serve as
insurance against adverse effects of climate change and non-climate stressors on their
livelihood. The core components of the livelihood portfolio are social, financial, human,
natural, and physical capital. Livelihood assets and their interconnection is the measure
of adaptive capacity and the level of vulnerability of the fisherfolk. The more asset
the fisherfolk have, the less vulnerable they are(Olajide and Lawanson 2014). Assets
endowment determine the livelihood options or strategies available to the fisherfolk
4 J. A. DANQUAH ET AL.
(Iiyama et al. 2008). The livelihood strategies at the disposal of fisherfolk involve either
using a diversified or alternative livelihood approach to reduce their level of vulner-
ability to shocks. Livelihood diversification within the context of fishing communities
is the process by which fisherfolk construct a diverse portfolio of activities and social
support capabilities to survive and to improve their standards of living (Ellis 1998;
Achiba 2018; Scoones 2005, 2009; Dai et al. 2019). Whereas alternative livelihoods are
sets of interventions or activities implemented to reduce the fishing communities or
fisherfolk over-reliance on fishing resources, generate economic benefits, and increase
local support for sustainable fishing resource management (see, e.g., Wright et al. 2016;
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of sustainable livelihood. Source: (Ellis 1998; Scoones 2005, 2009;
Freduah, Fidelman, and Smith 2019; Dai et al. 2019; Ayana, Megento, and Kussa 2021).
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 5
Hilson and Banchirigah 2009; Hanh and Boonstra 2019). From the perspective of
fishing and related allied industries, alternative livelihoods are designed to substitute
fishing activities considered to be environmentally detrimental and could impact the
fishing industry in the long term (Wright et al. 2016; Hilson and Banchirigah 2009;
Hanh and Boonstra 2019; Siegel and Veiga 2010; Wicander and Coad 2018). The
alternative livelihood approach involves replacing fishing-based incomes with other
sources (Hanh and Boonstra 2019; Roe et al. 2015). The alternative livelihood approach
is an effective way to reduce overexploitation of fishing resources and improve the
wellbeing of the users (Roe et al. 2015; Wicander and Coad 2018). Institutions have
the mandate to formulate policies, regulations, and laws that affect the major stake-
holders and small-scale artisanal fishers in the fishing industries as well as the coastal
communities whose livelihoods directly depend on fishing. Policies and institutions
influence the interconnections between livelihood assets and the adoption of appropriate
livelihood strategies, which ultimately can be translated into better livelihood outcomes
in the lives of fisherfolk.
Materials and methods
The study was conducted at four major fish landing sites in the Central Region of
Ghana, namely Elimina Anomabo, Apam, and Moree (Figure 2). The Central Region
has the highest concentration of fishing villages and landing beaches in the country
(Crawford et al. 2016). Elmina a major landing site (5° 5′ N; 1° 21′ W) and the
administrative capital of the Komenda-Edina-Eguafo-Abrem Municipal Assembly(Amador
et al. 2006). The average fish production in the district for the past five years is 10,571
metric tonnes per annum (Dovlo, Amador, and Nkrumah 2016). Moree (5° 8′ N; 1°
12′ W) is a coastal town in the Abura-Asebu-Kwamankese District. Moree shares a
boundary with the Cape Municipality in the Central region of Ghana. The major
economic activity in Moree is fishing, with some fisherfolk going on fishing expeditions
as far as The Gambia on the Gulf of Guinea. Anomabo (5° 10′ N; 1° 7′ W) is another
one of the fish landing sites and is located in the Mfantsiman Municipal of the Central
Region. The predominant occupation of the people in the town fishing, with a small
proportion of the community members engaged in low-level subsistence farming
(Akyeampong, Amador, and Nkrumah 2013). Apam (5° 16′ N; 0° 44′ W) is the admin-
istrative capital of Gomoa West District. The main occupations of the people in this
district are fishing and subsistence agriculture. The district is endowed with many fish
species of commercial importance, the predominant capture species are the sardinellas
(Akyeampong, Amador, and Nkrumah 2013; Dovlo, Amador, and Nkrumah 2016).
A questionnaire (structured and semi-structured(open-ended)) was designed to obtain
qualitative and quantitative data on individual characteristics and fisherfolk’s livelihood
strategies or options. In addition, to elicit information to evaluate the underlying causes
of decline in fish landings in the country. The survey was conducted in Elmina,
6 J. A. DANQUAH ET AL.
Anomabo, Moree, and Apam in June and August 2019. These four towns and com-
munities were purposively selected for the fact that they are major landing sites in the
Central Region (Amador et al. 2006). Due to limitations of resources, other landing
sites could not be covered. The primary data collected through a survey within the
communities were augmented with secondary data from the Ghana Canoe Frame Survey
(Dovlo, Amador, and Nkrumah 2016; Asiedu and Nunoo 2013). In addition, other
secondary data were also obtained from the FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Statistics
(FAO 2020) to strengthen the analysis. We used two time-series data: fish landings
data from 1976 to 2017 and fish import data from 1976 to 2017 in the analysis.
Sample procedure and data analysis
We employed two types of sampling procedures in the study purposive and systematic
sampling techniques. These sampling procedures were used to select 200 respondents
for this study. A total of 200 questionnaires were administered after pre-testing.
Although there are many landing sites in the Central Region of Ghana, the purposive
sampling technique (Maxwell 2013) was used to select four communities out of the
lot: Anomabo (N = 30), Elmina (N = 70), Moree (N = 30) and Apam (N = 70). The
Figure 2. Map of the study area.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 7
rationale behind the choice of these three landing sites is primarily based on the level
of fishing activity and the role it plays as a major livelihood within the communities.
In addition, for instance, landing sites like Elimina and Apam have fishing harbors
and cold-storage facilities. Elimina and Apam are two major landing sites in the Central
Region. At the community level (households level), a systematic sampling technique
was used to select fisherfolk that engages in fishing and other related activities(e.g.,
Torell et al. 2010). This involved walking through the communities from the beach
(south) to the north using GPS. The first house encountered in the community is
selected, and the second, ignored, and the third is sampled in this sequence. Thus,
every third household or homestead was sampled from the south to north direction.
At the household level, respondents selected for the interviews were those with their
livelihoods and wellbeing directly tied to the artisanal fishing industry. The primary
data collated were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Cronbach Alpha test statistic
was performed to evaluate the degree of reliability and agreement in the responses on
the Likert scale estimation (Bonett and Wright 2015). In addition, the nonparametric
Chi-square test statistic of homogeneity was conducted on changes in income level
over the years. We performed trend analysis on export and landings of fish times
series data from 1976 to 2017. The XLSTAT add-on in Microsoft excel 2013 operating
environment was used in the statistical analyses.
The status of sh landings
The overall fish catch per annum varied over the period from 1976 to 2017. The
lowest recorded annual fish landing was 246601 MT in 1976. The annual fish landings
increased steadily over the years to the peak value of about 492,783 MT in 1999. Since
2000, fish landings in the country have been decreasing from almost 500,000 MT to
287,801 MT in 2014. The country has to resort to active fish importation to augment
the gap in the fish landings (see, Figure 3). In 2007 and 2013, the total fish imports
into Ghana exceeded total fish landings, to a total annual amount of approximately
Figure 3. Fish Import against Landings from 1976 to 2017.
8 J. A. DANQUAH ET AL.
328,888 MT and 347,408 MT, respectively. In 2013, Ghana imported 373 million US
dollars of fish to address the deficit in fish landings (GOG 2015). The phenomenal
general decrease in fish landings has been reported by artisanal fisherfolk in the
country (Asiedu, Afriyie, and Amponsah 2018). Moreover, this is also affecting their
incomes and livelihoods.
Changes in income over the years
From the results in Figure 4, 53% of respondents maintained that they had seen a
reduction in their incomes over the past five years as compared to 16% who recorded
an increase in their incomes over the period (Figure 4). 21% of the respondents
maintained their incomes have remained stable over the five years, and 10% of the
respondents could not give any directional change in their income levels.
These results were further subjected to a Chi-square test analysis by disaggre-
gating the dataset into gender, that is, male and female fisherfolk. The results were
significant at the 5% level of probability (Chi2 = 8.356; DF = 3; P = 0.039), 20
females reported an increase in their incomes compared to their 12 male coun-
terparts (Table 1). Moreover, 68 (34%) males reported a decrease in their income
compared with 38 (19%) females. 30 (15%) males and 12 (6.0) females fisherfolks
indicated that their incomes had remained the same over the five years. 16 (8%)
Table 1. Changes in income over the past ve years.
Male Female TOTAL
Increasing 12 (6.0) 20(10.0) 32(16.0)
*RESPONSES Decreasing 68 (34.0) 38(19.0) 106(53.0)
No Change 30 (15.0) 12(6.0) 42(21.0)
Don’t Know 16 (8.0) 4(2.0) 20(10.0)
TOTA L 126 (63.0) 74(37.0) 200(100)
*Chi2(8.356): DF = 3, P < 0.039; The values in parenthesis are in percentages
Figure 4. Changes in income in the past ve years.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 9
males and 4 (2%) females of the 200 respondents maintained they don’t know
what has happened to their income level.
Contribution of shing to livelihood
The results revealed a high degree of consistency and reliability on the Likert scale
instrument used in the analysis. The Cronbach’s Alpha (α) was 0.73. The four questions
were asked based on a three-point scale Likert estimation ratings; to elicit or evaluate
fisherfolk’s level of understanding of the socioeconomic contribution of the artisanal
fishing industry to their lives and the nation as a whole. To many of the respondents,
the highest-ranked contribution of fishing is revenue generation to the government
through taxes and foreign exchange earnings (Table 2).
Fishing as a key income source to the fisherfolks was ranked second, and its role
as a contributor to food security was ranked third by respondents. However, many of
the fisherfolks do not see fishing as a permanent livelihood that can offer continuous
employment as they ranked fishing as permanent employment as fourth in the order
of importance. This is highlighted by the fact that many of the youth are not taking
up fishing as a vocation as was the case in times past. The youth are getting an edu-
cation and leaving behind the traditional way of living through fishing and related
activities. This problem is compounded by an aging population of fisherfolk in the
fishing communities across the country (Asiedu and Nunoo. 2013).
Fisherfolk’s perception of changes in shing and causes of the decline in sh
In general, 82% of the respondents interviewed in the study areas have an opinion
that there has been a decline in fishing landings over the years (Figure 5). Yet, there
is a relatively low proportion (6%) of respondents who believe that fishing landings
are on the increase. 5% of the respondents maintained that fish landings over the
years had remained about the same. However, 7% were undecided. This group of
respondents could not say whether fishing landings are increasing, decreasing, or
remain the same. They have no idea of the current status or state of fish landings in
the country. Nevertheless, 20% of the respondents still believe that the quantity of fish
caught had declined due to overfishing, and 19% attribute this to poor management
of domestic waste leading to pollution of the sea (Figure 6). The respondents gave
various reasons for the decline in fish catch apart from overfishing which featured the
most. Some of the respondents maintained that a decrease in fish landings to
Table 2. Fisherfolk perceptions to benet from artisanal canoe shing industry.
CONTRIBUTION A = 3 U = 2 D = 1 RATING SCORES RANK
Income to Fisherfolk 180 10 10 570 2
Revenue to Government 186 8 6 588 1
Food Security 100 78 22 478 3
Permanent Employment 124 16 68 472 4
NB: A = Agree; B = Undecided; D = Disagree; Cronbach Alpha = 0.73
10 J. A. DANQUAH ET AL.
unapproved or illegal methods of fishing, notable use of chemicals (15%). Others relate
the decline in fish landings to economic factors such as a decline in fish prices (12%),
high cost of inputs (10%), and inadequate storage facilities (9%).
Sociocultural factors were also mentioned by the respondents as contributing causes
of the decline in fish landings within the communities. Some of the respondents have
an opinion that there is a labor shift from the artisanal fishing industry to other
sectors of the economy since many fisherfolks are taking up other jobs as alternative
livelihoods (4%), getting an education (8%), and a generally poor attitude to work
amongst the youth (3%) were social factors mentioned by the respondents.
As a result of the decline in fishing landings in the country, many people, particularly
the youth, are adopting alternative livelihoods, which often results in leaving the fishing
Figure 6. Causes of decline in sh Landings according to respondents.
Figure 5. Household perception to sh decline.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 11
industry. Many of the fisherfolk switched to technical and vocational training. Those
who continue to engage in fishing and related activities diversified their livelihood by
having more than one income stream across fishing and non-fishing activities (Ellis
2000a; 2000b). The major alternative livelihoods within the four communities are
trading and commerce (i.e., buying and selling), mentioned by 36% of the respondents
interviewed in the fishing communities. Masonry (20%) feature as the second most
important alternative livelihood activity (Figure 7).
Commercial driving (16%) is another major choice of alternative livelihood amongst
the youth, particularly the taxi business. This is followed by carpentry (11%) and
hairdressing (10%). However, there is a relatively small proportion who depend solely
on fishing, thus have no alternative livelihood options (7%).
The decline in fish landings or catch is a major global problem leading to a collapse
of the fishing industry and loss of livelihood in most affected countries (Béné, Hersoug,
and Allison2010; Oliveira Júnior et al. 2016; Rahman et al. 2012; Scyphersa, Picoub,
and Grabowskia 2019). Ghana is no exception to this observed phenomenal decline
in fish landings. This has been reported by many authors in the country (Ofori-Danson
et al. 2012; Asiedu and Nunoo 2013; Atta-Mills, Alder, and Sumaila 2004; Nunoo et
al. 2014). However, in this paper, we explore the role of the artisanal fishing industry
within coastal communities and the impact of this decline in fish landings or catch
on their livelihoods, as well as the possible causes of the observed decline. The results
of the trend analysis confirm a general decrease in fish landings or catch from 1999
to 2017. This result is in line with a range of studies conducted by various authors
in the fishing industry (Tall and Failler 2012: Ofori-Danson et al. 2012; Atta-Mills,
Alder, and Sumaila 2004; Lazar et al .2018). However, fish landing saw a gradual
increase from 1976 to 1972 and 1983 to the peak production level in 1999. These
periods were characterized by robust fishing support services, with a thriving fishing
Figure 7. Alternate livelihood options.
12 J. A. DANQUAH ET AL.
boat building industry (Adjetey 1973; Agbodeka 1992). This was culminated by a
structural adjustment program (SAP) and trade liberalization in 1983 (Sensu, Barbier
and Benhin 2001). The Structural Adjustment Programme and trade liberalization
period led to issuances of more permits and licenses to foreign vessels for industrial
fishing and consequently the depletion of fish sock in the country (Atta-Mills, Alder,
and Sumaila 2004; Acquay 1992). Whilst fish landings were decreasing over the period,
fishing imports were increasing. Presently, annual fish imports exceed total fish pro-
duction in the country (Russell 2017; FAO 2016). These findings correlate with the
observations of the fisherfolk within the coastal communities that fish landings are
declining. Various factors have contributed to the decline in fish landings. The most
mentioned factors within the fishing community are the use of unapproved methods
in fishing. It is a known fact that most fishermen resort to the use of chemicals,
dynamite, undersize mesh size nets, overfishing, and trawler fishing (see,
Mutimukuru-Maravanyika et al. 2013; Falaye 2008; DeGraff-Johnson et al. 2010;
Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development (MoFAD) 2015). These underscore
other factors such as institutional failures to regulate and enforce existing laws to
ensure compliance in both the artisanal and industrial fisheries subsectors of the
economy. The decline in fish stocks has led to the implementation of a closed season
policy to revamp the fishing industry in the country (Rosina 2018; Apetorgbor 2018;
Adom, Sekyere, and Yarney 2019).
Due to the decline in fish landings, the livelihoods of fisherfolk have been affected.
This has translated into low-income levels for households that have directly depended
on fishing over the years. It is not surprising that there are systemic and endemic
high levels of poverty in the coastal communities of Ghana (Asiedu 2012; Asiedu et
al. 2013; Lawson, Gordon, and Schluchter 2012). Over the years, fisherfolk have seen
a gradual and continuous decline in their income. This confirms the assertion by
many authors that the reduction in fish catch or landings invariably led to the reduc-
tion in the income level of the fisherfolk (Amponsah 2015).
Many fisher households have resorted to diversifying their livelihoods to cope with
a decrease in incomes. The purpose of diversification is to develop portfolios of
income-generating activities to safeguard the fisherfolk’s livelihoods against the risk of
external shocks (Ellis 1998; Achiba 2018; Scoones 2005, 2009; Dai et al. 2019). These
results corroborated many studies on this subject that livelihood diversification becomes
mainstream mitigation strategies of fisherfolk against the decline of fish landings
(Amevenku, Asravor, and Kuwornu 2019; Owusu 2019; Martin, Lorenzen, and Bunnefeld
2013). According to Torell et al. 2017, livelihood diversification is a means by which
fisherfolk can reduce vulnerability to risk and provide a pathway out of poverty. The
main livelihoods option adopted by fisherfolk in place of decline fish landings is the
trading (commerce), driving, and masonry. The adoption of a livelihood diversification
strategy to mitigate the decline in incomes can also be seen as risk management
strategies (Kadfak 2020 Achiba 2018; Scoones 2005, 2009; Dai et al. 2019). Livelihood
diversification strategies by the fisherfolk is an adaptation strategy to reduce their
vulnerability from declining fishing stocks (see Ellis 2000b). Diversification of liveli-
hoods entails both fishing and non-fishing activities(Sensu, Losch, Freguin-Gresh, and
White 2010). The study encountered situations whereby some fisherfolk see fishing as
a part-time engagement. Many youths in the fishing communities are pursuing
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 13
education and leaving the traditional vocation of fishing. This exit decision from the
artisanal fishing industry is primarily due to the decline in fish capture and low-income
rewards (see, e.g., Daw et al. 2012; Asiedu and Nunoo 2013). The decision to leave
the fishing industry is more or less the adoption of an alternative livelihood strategy
(Hanh and Boonstra 2019; Roe et al. 2015). Despite the challenges in the industry,
many fisherfolks still believe that it is a major contributor to the national economy
as a source of income to households and as revenue in the form of taxes and foreign
exchange to the government, as well as a key component in ensuring food security
and job creation within the communities. From a gender perspective, the impact of
the decline in fish landing is highly felt by the male fisherfolk compared with their
female counterpart. This stems from their social role and differentiation within the
fish value chain. Handling, processing, distribution, and marketing of fish for con-
sumption are primarily done by females (Failler, Beyens, and Asiedu 2014; Torell et
al. 2019). Thus, each level of the value chain improves the wellbeing of females through
additional income (Nunoo et al. 2015). This is because, at each level of the value
chain that fish product passes through, there is an appreciation in the value (Russell
and Haanoomanjae 2012). By comparison, the males are at the bottom of the fish
value chain and directly involved in the primary harvesting of fish, except a few who
are in the service sector (Torell et al. 2019). In Ghana, for the marine canoe or arti-
sanal fisheries, it is only the males who are directly engaged in fishing (Nunoo et al.
2015). It is not surprising that in this study, the results indicate that 10% of female
fisherfolk observed improvement in their incomes although fish landings are declining.
A study by Walker(2001) revealed that about 35% of females in the artisanal marine
fisheries value chain, particularly processing and marketing own canoes. Moreover,
there is ample evidence to show that some female fish traders in the artisanal fishing
industry are the major creditors and financiers of equipment and canoes (Nunoo et
al. 2015; Gordon, Pulis, and Owusu-Adjei 2017; Britwum 2009; Torell et al. 2019).
This study evaluated the effects of declining fish landings over the years on fisherfolk
in the Central Region of Ghana. The study concludes that the reduced fish catch has
a tremendous impact on household income and the general wellbeing of fisherfolk.
To cope with the reduced income base, many fishing households have diversified their
livelihood activities. We also observed that declining fish landings have a more pro-
nounced effect on male fisherfolk than females as a result of traditional social differ-
entiated roles. The fisherfolk enumerated various underlying causes that have contributed
to reduced fish stocks. The main drivers are overfishing, pollution, use of small mesh
size net, and unapproved methods of fishing, particularly chemicals and dynamite.
Based on these conclusions, we recommend that intervention programs should target
the provision of non-fishing livelihood options through proactive technical and voca-
tional training for the fisherfolk in the coastal communities. There should be an
improvement in the implementation of a closed fishing season policy for artisanal
canoe fishing and adherence to traditional values of pelagic fishing as effective man-
agement measures for restoring the declining fish stock. This can be achieved through
14 J. A. DANQUAH ET AL.
co-management, dialogue, and participatory decision-making in the artisanal canoe
fisheries. The reduction of fishing efforts through a decrease in the number of artisanal
canoe fishermen through the provision of alternative livelihoods. Education of the
fisherfolk about the dangers of using unapproved methods of fishing on their health,
livelihoods, and wellbeing. The full implementation of the national fisheries manage-
ment plan of Ghana and national policy for the management of the marine fisheries
sector. This will facilitate the long-term conservation of fish stocks, ensure food security,
and maintaining sustainable livelihoods for the fisherfolk. In furtherance of this, existing
policy and legal frameworks should be strengthened and enforced to bring about
compliance in artisanal fisheries. This can only be achieved through adequate capacity
building and retooling of mandated institutions that have oversight responsibility to
regulate and enforce laws in the fishing industry. Moreover, the encroachment of
industry fishing fleet to zones on the continental shelf reserve for artisanal canoe
fishing should be checked to enable pelagic fish stocks to recover. The establishment
of marine protected areas with cooperation with local fishing communities along the
coast will help many of the fish stocks to recover. Migratory pelagic fish should be
managed with the cooperation of countries in the sub-regional along the west African
coast. These will go a long way to revamp the fishing industry and stopping the decline
in fish stocks. Finally, in light of these findings, adequate education of the fisherfolk
on the need to use approved methods in fishing and adherence to regulations and
laws in the industry is of paramount importance.
We are grateful to Messrs Samson Aboagye for secondary data collection and literature search
and Ebenezer Nana Kwaku Boateng for developing the map for the study area, with support
from the GIS Unit, Department of Geography and Regional Planning, University of Cape Coast.
No potential conict of interest was reported by the authors.
Achiba, G. A. 2018. Managing livelihood risks: Income diversication and the livelihood strat-
egies of households in pastoral settlements in Isiolo County, Kenya. Pastoralism: Research,
Policy and Practice 8 (1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13570-018-0120-x.
Acquay, H. K. 1992. Implications of structural adjustment for Ghana’s marine sheries policy.
Fisheries Research 14 (1):59–70. doi: 10.1016/0165-7836(92)90073-3.
Adjetey, J. N. N. 1973. Ghana’s experience in distant-water sheries. Paper presented at Technical
Session IV, Technical Conference on Fishery Management and Development, (FI:FMD/73/S-13).
Vancouver, Canada, 13–23 February.
Adom, D., P. A. Sekyere, and L. Yarney. 2019. A return to the Ghanaian cultural values of
closed shing season in Ghana’s artisanal marine shing: An essential means of restoring
small pelagic sh stocks. Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research 21
(3):95–110. doi: 10.2478/trser-2019-0020.
Agbodeka, F. 1992. An economic history of Ghana: From the earliest times. Ghana University
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 15
Akpalu, W., S. S. Eriksen, and G. K. Vondolia. 2018. e sheries sector in Ghana: A political
economy analysis. Norwegian Institute of International Aairs. NUPI Report.7/2018.
Akyeampong, S., K. Amador, and B. Nkrumah. 2013. Report on the 2013 Ghana Marine Canoe
Frame Survey. Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development, Fisheries Commission,
Fisheries Scientic Survey Division. Information Report No 35.
Amador, K., P. Bannerman, R. Quartey, and R. Ashong. 2006. Ghana canoe frame survey 2004.
Information Report Number 34. Marine Fisheries Research Division, Ministry of Fisheries,
Amevenku, F. K. Y., R. K. Asravor, and J. K. M. Kuwornu. 2019. Determinants of livelihood
strategies of shing households in the Volta Basin, Ghana. Cogent Economics & Finance 7
(1):1595291. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2019.1595291.
Amponsah, S. K. K. 2015. Assessment of the security of coastal shing operations in Ghana from
the perspectives of safety, poverty and catches. esis is submitted to the Department of Marine
and Fisheries Sciences of the University of Ghana, Legon.
Apetorgbor, S. 2018. Closed season brief. e USAID/Ghana sustainable sheries management
project (SFMP). Narragansett, RI: Coastal Resources Center, Graduate School of Oceanography,
University of Rhode Island, GH2014_POL109_CRC, 10.
Asiedu, B. 2012. An investigation of sh catch and poverty levels for enhanced management of
small-scale sheries of Ghana. PhD esis., University of Ghana. pp 203.
Asiedu, B., and F. K. E. Nunoo. 2013. Alternative livelihoods: A tool for sustainable sheries
management in Ghana. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2 (2):21–8.
Asiedu, B., F. K. E. Nunoo, P. K. Ofori-Danson, D. B. Sarpong, and U. R. Sumaila. 2013. Poverty
measurements in small-scale sheries of Ghana: A step towards poverty eradication. Current
Research Journal of Social Sciences 5 (3):75–90. doi: 10.19026/crjss.5.5542.
Asiedu, B., G. Afriyie, and S. K. K. Amponsah. 2018. Overview of marine stock enhancement,
restocking and sea ranching in Ghana. Accessed June 27, 2020. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.79454.
Atindana, S. A., P. K. Ofori-Danson, and S. Brucet. 2009. Modelling the eects of climate change
on shellsh production in marine artisanal sheries of Ghana. AAS Open Research 2(16).
Atta-Mills, J., J. Alder, and U. R. Sumaila. 2004. e decline of a regional shing nation: e
case of Ghana and West Africa. Natural Resources Forum 28 (1):13–21. doi:
Ayana, G. F., T. L. Megento, and F. G. Kussa. 2021. e extent of livelihood diversication on
the determinants of livelihood diversication in Assosa Wereda, Western Ethiopia. GeoJournal.
Barbier, E. B., and J. K. A. Benhin. 2001. e eects of the structural adjustment program on
deforestation in Ghana. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 30 (1):66–80.
Béné, C. B., Hersoug, and E. H. Allison. 2010. Not by rent alone: Analysing the pro-poor
functions of small-scale sheries in developing countries. Development Policy Review 28
(3):325–58. 00486.x doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.
Bonett, D. G., and T. A. Wright. 2015. Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypoth-
esis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior 36 (1):3–15. doi:
Britwum, A. O. 2009. e gendered dynamics of production relations in Ghanaian coastal
shing. Feminist Africa 12:69–85.
Chambers, R., and G. Conway. 1992. Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the
21st century. IDS Working Paper 238. Brighton, Sussex, UK, Institute of Development Studies.
Cobbina, R. 2018. Eort control in the artisanal canoe shery of Ghana: Implications and likelihood
of success. Open Access Master’s eses. Paper 1271. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses/1271.
Crawford, B., L. Gonzales, D. Amin, B. Nyari-Hardi, and Y. A. Sarpong. 2016. Report on the
baseline survey of small pelagic shing households along the Ghana Coast. e USAID/Ghana
Sustainable Fisheries Management Project (SFMP) Narragansett, RI: Coastal Resources Center,
Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island. GH2014_PGM187_CRC, pp. 122.
16 J. A. DANQUAH ET AL.
Dadson, I. Y., A. B. Owusu, and O. Adams. 2016. Analysis of shoreline change along Cape
Coast- Sekondi Coast, Ghana. Geography Journal 2016:1–9. 1868936(9). http://dx.doi.
org/10.1155/2016/1868936 doi: 10.1155/2016/1868936.
Dai, X., Z. Wu, Y. Fan, B. Li, Z. Yang, B. Nan, and X. Bi. 2019. Characteristics and determi-
nants of livelihood diversication of dierent household types in far northwestern China.
Sustainability 12 (1):64. doi: 10.3390/su12010064.
Daw, T. M., J. E. Cinner, T. R. McClanahan, K. Brown, S. M. Stead, N. A. J. Graham, and J.
Maina. 2012. To sh or not to sh: Factors at multiple scales aecting artisanal shers’
readiness to exit a declining shery. PLoS ONE 7 (2):e31460. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0031460
DeGra-Johnson, K. A. A., J. Blay, F. K. E. Nunoo, and C. C. Amankwah. 2010. “Biodiversity
threats assessment of the Western Region of Ghana”. e Integrated Coastal and Fisheries
Governance (ICFG) Initiative Ghana.
Dinku, A. M. 2018. Determinants of livelihood diversication strategies in Borena pastoralist
communities of Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. Agriculture & Food Security 7 (1):41. doi:
Dovlo, E., K. Amador, and B. Nkrumah. 2016. Report on the 2016 Ghana marine canoe frame
survey. Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development, Fisheries Commission, Fisheries
Scientic Survey Division, Republic of Ghana. August 2016
Ellis, F. 1998. Household strategies and rural livelihood diversications. Journal of Development
Studies 35 (1):1–38. doi: 10.1080/00220389808422553.
Ellis, F. 2000a. Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford, UK: Oxford
Ellis, F. 2000b. e determinants of rural livelihood diversication in developing countries.
Journal of Agricultural Economics 51 (2):289–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01229.x.
Failler, P., Y. Beyens, and B. Asiedu. 2014. Value chain analysis of the shery sector in Ghana
with focus on quality, environmental, social, sustainable, food safety, organic requirements
and its compliance infrastructure. UNIDO/MOTI TCB project. Trade Capacity Building
Programme for Ghana. US/GHA/06/005 - Contract No. 3000018889
Falaye, A. E. 2008. Illegal unreported unregulated (IUU) shing in West Africa (Nigeria and
Ghana). Report of a Study prepared for MRAG, MRAG, London, pp 32.
FAO. 2016. Fishery and Aquaculture Country Proles: e Republic of Ghana. Fisheries and
Aquaculture Department. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. February
FAO. 2020. Fisheries statistics and information. Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Accessed 20th April 2020. http://www.
Freduah, G., P. Fidelman, and T. F. Smith. 2019. A framework for assessing adaptive capacity
to multiple climatic and nonclimatic stressors in small-scale sheries. Environmental Science
& Policy 101:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.016.
GOG. 2015. Fisheries management plan of Ghana: A national policy for management of the
marine sheries sector 2015-2019.
Gordon, A., A. Pulis, and E. Owusu-Adjei. 2017. Smoked marine sh from Western Region,
Ghana: A value chain assessment. WorldFish Center, USAID Integrated Coastal and Fisheries
Governance Initiative for the Western Region, Ghana: Cape Coast, Ghana, 2011; 46 p. Accessed
20th May, 27, 2020. http://www.worldshcenter.org/resourcecentre/WF_2916.pdf.
Hanh, T. T. H., and W. J. Boonstra. 2019. What prevents small-scale fishing and aquaculture
households from engaging in alternative livelihoods? A case study in the Tam Giang la-
goon, Vietnam. Ocean & Coastal Management 182:104943. ocecoaman. 2019.104943 doi:
Hasselberg, A. E., I. Aakre, J. Scholtens, R. Overå, J. Kolding, M. S. Bank, A. Atter, and M.
Kjellevold. 2020. Fish for food and nutrition security in Ghana: Challenges and opportunities.
Global Food Security 26 :100380. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100380.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 17
Hilson, G., and S. M. Banchirigah. 2009. Are alternative livelihood projects alleviating poverty
in mining communities? Experiences from Ghana. e Journal of Development Studies 45
(2):172–96. doi: 10.1080/00220380802553057.
Huynh, P. T. A., N. D. Le, S. T. H. Le, and H. X. Nguyen. 2021. Vulnerability of shery- based
livelihoods to climate change in coastal communities in central Vietnam. Coastal Management
49 (3):275–92. doi: 10.1080/08920753.2021.1899927.
Iiyama, M., P. Kariuki, P. Kristjanson, S. Kaitibie, and J. Maitima. 2008. Livelihood diversica-
tion strategies, incomes and soil management strategies: A case study from Kerio Valley,
Kenya. Journal of International Development 20 (3):380–97. doi: 10.1002/jid.1419.
Jakku, E., and T. Lynam. 2010. What is adaptive capacity? Report for the South East Queensland
Climate Adaptation Research Initiative. CSIRO.
Kadfak, A. 2020. More than just shing: e formation of livelihood strategies in an urban
shing community in Mangaluru, India. e Journal of Development Studies 56 (11):2030–
44.0/00220388.2019. 1650168 doi: 10.
Lawson, E. T., C. Gordon, and W. Schluchter. 2012. e dynamics of poverty-environment
linkages in the coastal zone of Ghana. Ocean & Coastal Management 67:30–8. doi: 10.1016/j.
Lazar, N., K. Yankson, J. Blay, P. Ofori-Danson, P. Markwei, K. Agbogah, P. Bannerman, M.
Sotor, K. K. Yamoah, and W. B. Bilisini. 2018. Status of the small pelagic stocks in Ghana
and recommendations to achieve sustainable shing 2017. Scientic and Technical Working
Group. USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project (SFMP). Coastal Resources
Center, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island. GH2014_SCI042_CRC
Losch, B., S. Freguin-Gresh, and E. White. 2010. Structural dimensions of liberalization on ag-
riculture. Washington, DC: World Bank
Martin, S. M., K. Lorenzen, and N. Bunnefeld. 2013. Fishing farmers: Fishing, livelihood di-
versication and poverty in rural Laos. Human Ecology 41 (5):737–47. 9567-y doi: 10.1007/
Maxwell, J. A. 2013. Qualitative research design: An intractive approach. Applied Social Research
Methods Series, pp 211. Washington, DC: Sage.
Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture Development (MoFAD). 2015. Annual Report. Accra.
Mutimukuru-Maravanyika, T., C. Asare, G. Ameyaw, D. Mills, and K. Agbogah. 2013. Ghana
coastal sheries governance dialogue: Developing options for a legal framework for sheries
co-management in Ghana. USAID, Coastal Resources Center of University of Rhode Island
and WorldFish Center, 59pp.
Nunoo, F. K. E., B. Asiedu, E. O. Kombat, and B. Samey. 2015. Sardinella and other small
pelagic value and supply chain of the shery sector, Ghana. e USAID/Ghana Sustainable
Fisheries Management Project (SFMP). Narragansett, RI: Coastal Resources Center, Graduate
School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island and Netherlands Development
Organization. GH2014_ACT044_SNV. 98 pp.
Nunoo, F. K. E., B. Asiedu, K. Amador, D. Belhabib, V. Lam, R. Sumaila, and D. Pauly. 2014.
Marine sheries catches in Ghana: Historic reconstruction for 1950 to 2010 and current
economic impacts. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture 22 (4):274–83. doi:
Ofori-Danson, P. K., K. Apegyah, B. Asiedu, and D. K. Atsu. 2012. Stock assessment study and
sheries management plan for the Bui Reservoir 2012. Report Submitted to the Bui Power
Authority, pp: 104.
Olajide, O., and T. Lawanson. 2014. Climate change and livelihood vulnerabilities of low-income
coastal communities in Lagos, Nigeria. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development
6 (1):42–51. doi: 10.1080/19463138.2013.878348.
Oliveira Júnior, J. G. C., L. P. S. Silva, A. C. M. Malhado, V. S. Batista, N. N. Fabré, and R. J.
Ladle. 2016. Artisanal sheries research: A need for globalization?PLoS ONE 11 (3):e0150689
18 J. A. DANQUAH ET AL.
Owusu, V. 2019. Impacts of the petroleum industry on the livelihoods of sherfolk in Ghana:
A case study of the Western Region. e Extractive Industries and Society 6 (4):1256–64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.11.002 doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2019.11.002.
Rahman, M., M. F. Tazim, S. Dey, A. K. M. S. Azam, and M. R. Islam. 2012. Alternative live-
lihood options of shermen of Nijhum Dwip under Hatiya Upazila of Noakhali District in
Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Rural Development 2 (2):24–31. doi: 10.3923/ajrd.2012.24.31.
Roe, D., F. Booker, M. Day, W. Zhou, S. Allebone-Webb, N. A. O. Hill, N. Kumpe, G. Petrokofsky,
K. Redford, D. Russell, et al. 2015. Are alternative livelihood projects eective at reducing
local threats to specied elements of biodiversity and/or improving or maintaining the con-
servation status of those elements?Environmental Evidence 4 (1):1–22. doi doi: 10.1186/
Rosina, C. 2018. Eort control in the artisanal canoe shery of Ghana: Implications and likelihood
of success. Open Access Master’s eses. paper 1271. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/the-
Rurangwa, E., S. K. Agyakwah, H. Boon, and B. C. Bolman. 2015. Development of aquaculture
in Ghana analysis of the sh value chain and potential business cases. Wageningen UR,
IMARES report C021/15
Russell, D., and S. Haanoomanjae. 2012. Manual on value chain analysis and promotion. Regional
training on value chain analysis Project ref. N° SA-4.1-B20 Pescares Italia SRL Project Funded
by the European Union.
Russell, H. 2017. Fishery dependent communities in coastal Ghana: Nutritional security, gender,
and resilience. A thesis submitted in partial fulllment of the requirements for the Degree
of Master of Marine Aairs, University of Washington. pp 134.
Scoones, I. 2005. Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. Sussex, UK: Institute
of development studies.
Scoones, I. 2009. Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. e Journal of Peasant Studies
36 (1):171–96. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820503.
Scyphersa, S. B., J. S. Picoub, and J. H. Grabowskia. 2019. Chronic social disruption following
a systemic shery failure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116 (46):22912-22914.
Siegel, S., and M. M. Veiga. 2010. e myth of alternative livelihoods: Artisanal mining, gold.
and poverty. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 41 (3/4):272–88. doi: 10.1504/
Smit, B., and J. Wandel. 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental
Change 16 (3):282–92. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008.
Smit, B., and O. Pilifosova. 2003. From adaptation to adaptive capacity and vulnerability reduc-
tion. In Climate change, adaptive capacity and development, eds. J. B. Smith, R. J. T. Klein,
S. Huq. London: Imperial College Press.
Tall, A., and P. Failler. 2012. Fishery and aquaculture industry in Ghana. Series report number
1 of the review of the shery and aquaculture industry in the 22 ATLAFCO Member States.
October 2012. e Ministerial Conference on Fisheries Cooperation among African States
Bordering the Atlantic Ocean (ATFALCO).
Torell, E., B. Crawford, D. Kotowicz, M. D. Herrera, and J. Tobey. 2010. Moderating our ex-
pectations on livelihoods in ICM: Experiences from ailand, Nicaragua, and Tanzania.
Coastal Management 38 (3):216–37. doi: 10.1080/08920753.2010.483166.
Torell, E., C. McNally, B. Crawford, and G. Majubwa. 2017. Coastal livelihood diversication
as a pathway out of poverty and vulnerability: Experiences from Tanzania. Coastal Management
45 (3):199–218. doi: 10.1080/08920753.2017.1303718.
Torell, E., D. Bilecki, A. Owusu, B. Crawford, K. Beran, and K. Kent. 2019. Assessing the im-
pacts of gender integration in Ghana’s sheries sector. Coastal Management 47 (6):507–26.
Walker, B. L. E. 2001. Sisterhood and seine-nets: Engendering development and conservation
in Ghana’s marine shery. e Professional Geographer 53 (2):160–77. 0124.00277. doi:
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 19
Wicander, S., and L. Coad. 2018. Can the provision of alternative livelihoods reduce the impact
of wild meat hunting in West and Central Africa. Conservation and Society 16 (4):441–58.
World Bank. 2010. World development report 2010: Development and Climate Change, 424.
Washington, DC: e World Bank.
Wright, J. H., A. Nicholas, R. Hill, D. Roe, J. M. Rowclie, N. F. Kumpel, M. Day, F. Booker,
and E. J. Milner-Gulland. 2016. Reframing the concept of alternative livelihoods. Conservation
Biology 30 (1):7–13. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12607.
Yamoah, K. K. 2018. Fisheries Working Group (FWG) Quarterly Regional Coordination meetings
with SFMP Partners. e USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project (SFMP).
Narragansett, RI: Coastal Resources Center, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of
Rhode Island and Friends of the Nation. GH2014_ACT171_FON29pp