Access to this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Circular Economy and Sustainability
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
REVIEW PAPER
Economic Diversification Trends in the Gulf: the Case
of Saudi Arabia
Sarah Muhanna Al Naimi
1
Received: 14 May 2021 /Accepted: 16 August 2021
#The Author(s) 2021
Abstract
A national economy which is dependent on income from just one source is vulnerable,
especially when that income comes from non-renewable resources. The sustainable
prosperity of an economy thus relies on the successful implementation of economic
diversification. Diversification is key to creating an attractive, flourishing environment
in a country and improving the quality of its institutions and its citizens’lives. The
countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) are accelerating their efforts to achieve
economic diversification, with their national visions reflecting a shared aim of securing
permanent high standards of living for future generations. After the first boom in oil
prices in 1970, Saudi Arabia’s government introduced primary development plans to
diversify its economy. In 2016, it announced its 2030 vision to establish sustainable
growth through economic diversification. The economic diversification strategy of Saudi
Arabia is founded on several pillars, including investment in human capital and education
and investment in non-oil sectors such as tourism. This paper aims to analyze the
economic diversification trends in the GCC region with a special focus on Saudi Arabia
as a case study. Within this wider context, the paper will concentrate on Saudi Arabia’s
efforts to achieve diversification by building a knowledge-based economy. Focusing on
the quality of education and research improves the human capital available in the country
which contributes to the growth of the economy. Results reveal that although Saudi
Arabia has embarked on its diversification plans, the current status of oil prices, the deficit
in the Saudi general budget, and the country’s traditional educational system will hinder
and slow this process.
Keywords Rentier state .Knowledge-based economy .Economic diversification .UN 2030
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00106-0
*Sarah Muhanna Al Naimi
199959353@qu.edu.qa
1
Gulf Studies Program, Qatar University, P O 2713 Doha, Qatar
Circular Economy and Sustainability (2022) 2:221–230
/Published online: 28 August 2021
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Introduction
In the early years of the 1930s, the discovery of oil in the GCC region represented a turning
point for the six sheikhdoms: Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, UAE, Oman, and Saudi Arabia. Once
composed of hermetic, nomadic, and illiterate communities, they have transformed into states
that are characterized by major growth and high energy consumption. As the control of the oil
industry moved to the GCC sheikhdoms under the process of nationalization, these monarchies
initially fixed the prices of energy products and services at a low level. The increase in oil
prices led to an increase of oil revenues and the consolidation of autocratic regimes. Oil was
considered by these ruling elites as the core of their regimes’existence and the foundation of
their economic prosperity. Since these countries were founded on a patronage system, heavily
reliant on the use of subsidies, a new social contract was needed between the GCC rulers and
their populations which was based on rents. That is, rulers would distribute parts of the rents
emanating from oil revenues to their subjects/citizens in return for the consolidation of popular
support for the ruling sheiks. Hvidt [1] labels the GCC countries “allocation states.”Some
examples of these rents are favors, public goods, and services.
However, this process had its price. Despite the golden façade of these Gulf rentier states,
the weakness of the system is apparent in the countries’inability to withstand fluctuations in
international oil prices. Hvidt [1] believes that the system is incapable of sustaining the
necessary development of the GCC countries as the income it provides for their populations
and economies is volatile. For almost half a century, the source of income for the GCC region
has been firmly linked to hydrocarbon revenues; these non-renewable resources form the
mainstay of their economies. Shifts in the prices of hydrocarbon resources therefore impact
directly on these rentier states, undermining the strength of their patriarchal systems, as
demonstrated when oil prices started to decline sharply in 2015 and 2016 [2]. Together with
low domestic oil prices, subsidies led to the increase of local consumption of energy resources
to the extent that domestic demand began to exert pressure on the GCC’s oil exports. These
issues pose a threat to the GCC’s energy security. The importance and value of the Gulf region
are clear: the GCC region possesses 30% of the world’s crude oil and 22% of the world’sgas
[3]. These territories are witnessing dynamic shifts and influential changes in different
realms—political, demographic, and economic. The GCC’s economic diversification repre-
sents a decisive solution to address this current risk.
This paper is organized as follows. It begins with a description of the methodology and the
conceptual framework that underpin the study, including definitions of the key concept of
economic diversification and other relevant terms. A sketch of the historical situation then
provides an overview of the main economic diversification trends in the GCC states. The
following two sections focus on the process of economic diversification in Saudi Arabia as
outlined by its national Vision 2030 and analyze this economic diversification through the lens
of efforts to establish a knowledge-based economy. The paper ends with some brief
conclusions.
Methodology
Examining and exploring diversification trends in the GCC, and in particular the trajectory of
economic diversification in Saudi Arabia, is the principal goal of this paper. In addition, it
studies the progress of this strategy and sheds light on the factors that have played a role in
Circular Economy and Sustainability (2022) 2:221–230
222
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
delaying its achievement. Economic diversification in Saudi Arabia started in 1970 and was
further consolidated in April 2016 in the Saudi Vision 2030 [4]. In the words of Prince
Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince, this vision aims
specifically “to reinforce and diversify the capabilities of our economy, turning our key
strengths into enabling tools for a fully diversified future”.
1
Research methodology is defined by Bhujanga Rao [5]as“an appropriate method or
methods for an exhaustive and detailed investigative study of [the] problem of research”
(p.10). This study falls within the category of analytical research, in which the researcher
utilizes available data in order to make a critical evaluation of the selected research problem
[5]. This study depends on documentary analysis. In understanding the development of
diversification policy in Saudi Arabia, the analysis of documents gives insight into the
components and actors in the progress of this policy as well as the linkages between policy
and practice. Prior [6] considers document analysis to be essential in social sciences, where
documents have a dual role: first, they contain written information which can be examined to
interpret a social phenomenon; second, they can catalyze social interaction. Hence, studying
documents can shed light on the context in which a certain policy emerges and how that policy
influences and reflects societal change. Sources that inform this paper include documents of
the Saudi government, the United Nations, the World Bank, and the World Economic Forum.
Conceptual Framework
Achieving economic diversification has a positive impact on the sustainable growth and
prosperity of a nation. To construct a comprehensive understanding of economic diversifica-
tion, this paper will begin by defining the concept of economic diversification and scrutinizing
the definitions of several related terms. In the context of the Gulf region, economic diversi-
fication refers to reducing the dependence of its economy on hydrocarbon resources such as oil
and gas. Being dependent on a single source for revenue directly impacts the economy, linking
it to the price of this principal source. In this region, consumption levels and population growth
are putting increasing pressure on the depleted resources in the Gulf. The GCC countries are
facing a future in which local consumption of energy resources will surpass the foreign
demand for these resources, jeopardizing the whole basis of the region’s economy.
Economic diversification refers to the transformation of an economy that is reliant on a
specific source for its income (oil and gas revenues as in the case of the GCC countries), into
an economy in which other sectors, including non-hydrocarbons, play a significant role.
Examples of non-hydrocarbon fields might include industry, agriculture, and tourism. For
the GCC states, economic diversification aims to minimize the risks which are associated with
oil price fluctuations, by reducing their reliance on a single finite resource and instead
dispersing it across multiple potentially infinite resources [7]. The expectation is that economic
diversification will not only make the economy less vulnerable to risks associated with price
swings in the short term, but it will also enable the economy to provide prosperity for the
forthcoming generations when oil and gas reserves run out. In 2008, the state of Qatar
published its Qatar National Vision 2030 which warns that a failure to implement this goal
would amount to an injustice against future generations: “[t]he rights of future generations
would be threatened if the depletion of non-renewable resources were not compensated by the
1
See https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/v2030/leadership-message/
Circular Economy and Sustainability (2022) 2:221–230 223
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
creation of new sources of renewable wealth”[8]. In the same vein, Al-Jundi [7]discussesthe
necessity of transforming the economy of the UAE into one that “can survive without
oil revenues stimulation and …maintain economic achievements after the end of the
oil era”(p.15).
Economic diversification also paves the way for the accomplishment of the UN’s Sustain-
able Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs comprise 17 goals which were agreed upon in
2015 by all UN member states, to be achieved by 2030, within the “2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development”[9]. The UN defines the SDGs as part of an action plan that aims
to “end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure that by 2030 all people enjoy peace and
prosperity”[9].
Economic diversification consolidates the economic and financial foundations of a country
[7]. If one form of investment yields low revenues, other investment tools can compensate.
Thus, diversification requires changes to be implemented in the economic infrastructure. These
shifts are illustrated by an increase in manufacturing output, the expansion of the role of the
private sector, and the creation of a circular economy and a knowledge-based economy. The
expansion of manufacturing in terms of product diversity and output through successful
industrialization results in the emergence of another level of diversification which is labeled
by Morakabati et al. (2014, cited in [2]) as export diversification. Export diversification has
been increasing recently in developing countries. In the course of the past half century, nearly
80% of countries that were importers of principal goods have transformed into exporters of
manufactured goods. Export diversification boosts the economy by, for example, promoting
the effective deployment of natural and human resources, attracting foreign investments, and
furthering social and economic progress. Wilhelms [10] explains in detail the gains to be
achieved from export diversification by developing countries. He argues that export diversi-
fication leads to economic progress as it stabilizes trade profits, creates new job opportunities,
and broadens export processes. Clearly, diversification of exports would be significant for a
region like the GCC, which imports nearly 98% of its needs from global markets [2]. By
increasing exports, the GCC countries will encourage private sector engagement and will
reduce the risk of reliance on oil and gas by shifting attention towards exporting manufactured
and industrialized exports instead of only crude oil and natural gas.
The increased engagement of the private sector can be expected to lead to further economic
diversification, for example, through a process of privatization and through Public–Private
Partnership programs (PPPs) [11] which would pump money into the economy from sources
outside the energy sector. The private sector would also bring foreign money into domestic
markets through foreign direct investments—investments which would benefit the oil-based
economies of the GCC countries and ease their transfer to knowledge-based economies. Hvidt
[1] stresses that these investments can bring new employment opportunities, new technologies,
and innovative methods of management to an economy. Continued dependence on the oil and
gas sector cannot provide careers for the growing population in the long term, especially in a
youthful region such as the GCC. According to Abyad [12], youth below the age of 25 years
constitutes 54% of the population of the GCC. This issue can be addressed by engaging the
private sector in creating a diversified economy and generating new job opportunities.
In this context, it should be noted that the public sector in the GCC region is currently the
main source of employment. Levels of bureaucracy in this sector are high, with resultant high
costs [13]. This can threaten the sustainability of GCC economic systems, which are dependent
on non-renewable hydrocarbon resources. Kinninmont [14] argues that the revenues emanat-
ing from these economic systems cannot offset the increases in the public expenditure of these
Circular Economy and Sustainability (2022) 2:221–230
224
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
rentier states that have taken place since 2003. The World Bank’s“Global Economic Pros-
pects”2020 report supports this claim and adds that even GCC governmental investments did
not help in counterbalancing the shrinking oil market activity worldwide [15]. Although some
steps have been taken towards economic diversification and the establishment of sovereign
wealth funds (SWFs) in GCC countries, these measures are still in the early stages, and the
income generated by these SWFs is not yet enough to compensate for low oil prices on the
international market. Sovereign wealth funds are investment funds owned by a state. Funding
for SWFs emanates from different sources, including commodity exports [16]suchas(inthe
case of the GCC region) hydrocarbon resources. The main reason for establishing SWFs in
GCC countries has been to diversify their economies and secure sustainability for future
generations, but Kinninmont [14] cautions that SWFs cannot provide financial stability that
completely offsets GCC government spending nor can they counteract the challenges that
result from depending on an unrenewable hydrocarbon resources. For example, Abu Dhabi’s
SWF, which is considered one of the top global SWFs, would provide a partial substitution for
only 9 years of this emirate’s public spending [14].
Investment in human capital, meanwhile, requires reform in the educational process to
create specialized and highly qualified citizens. Mishrif and Al Balushi [2] point out that
attempts to modernize education in several GCC countries such as Qatar and the UAE have
focused only on investing in the latest physical infrastructures and not on the necessary
curricular reforms. Traditional educational systems in the GCC region will thwart the process
of creating specialized human capital. To achieve their goal, GCC countries must move from
resource-based hydrocarbon economies into diversified and knowledge-based economies. The
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defines the latter as
“economies which are openly based on production, distribution, and use knowledge and
information with the important role of information, technology and learning in performing”
[17] (p. 168), as opposed to resource-based economies which are dependent on natural
resources as the source of GDP income. The GCC economies currently fall within the latter
type, but their diversification plans focus on circularity and establishing a knowledge-based
economy.
Ozili [18] defines a circular economy as “an economic system that promotes efficiency
through eliminating waste and the continuous use of resources”(p.3). A circular economy can
enhance sustainability by shifting patterns of consumption and production through innovative
strategies and creative business models. Unlike traditional linear economic systems which are
based on extraction of raw materials, production, and disposal of waste, a circular economy
aims at investing efficiently in the life cycle of resources. Thus, the loop in the production
cycle is closed, recycling is maximized, and waste is minimized [18]. Shifting to a circular
economy pattern promotes environmental sustainability through efficient waste management,
energy recovery, and careful usage of raw materials. There is a correlation between a circular
economy and a knowledge-based economy: in order to effect the transition to a circular
economy, a knowledge-based economy which improves educational levels is essential. Al-
Saidi et al. [19] describe a shift in knowledge and reform of institutions as key factors in
creating economic incentives which support, and are supported by, a circular and knowledge-
based economy. In establishing a knowledge-based economy, educational systems play a vital
role: “investment in education will be the essential factor to enable the local manufacturers to
be able to meet global standards”[13] (p.12) and to avoid being left behind in terms of global
competitiveness. In the context of the GCC region, only two GCC states have managed to
reach the top thirty countries in the World Competitiveness Report 2019: UAE, ranked 25th
Circular Economy and Sustainability (2022) 2:221–230 225
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
globally, and Qatar, ranked 29th globally [20]. Wirba [17] argues that the Gulf region has
succeeded in creating GDP levels that are similar to those of the developed countries, but the
levels of their investment in research and development (R&D) are similar to those of
developing countries.
Economic diversification occurs in two directions—vertical and horizontal. Vertical diver-
sification concentrates the process of expansion within a sector by introducing additional steps.
Hvidt [1] argues that this form of diversification occurs in a backwards and forwards direction
in the stages of an industry. This maintains earnings and increases value-added products
domestically. In vertical diversification, an industry can shift itself from one stage into another
[1]. In other words, there is a gradual change in the stages of one industry from primary to
secondary to tertiary sector. At the time of writing, it can be observed that the industries of the
GCC countries are still in the primary phase, which is the process of extraction of a raw
material (e.g., a natural energy resource), and preparation for it to be exported. For GCC
countries to upgrade their industries to reach the secondary and tertiary levels, these states must
accelerate and deepen their investment in their local manufacturing industries. These industries
would then be in a position to transform these extracted resources into tangible products,
which represents the secondary sector. The tertiary sector would be represented by the
processes of selling these manufactured outputs and transporting them. Furthermore, the
GCC countries must also pay more attention to sectors that have so far been less of a focus,
such as agriculture.
Horizontal diversification, on the other hand, entails the expansion of different possibilities
for innovative products. Recently, the GCC countries have turned to this category of diversi-
fication as illustrated by their investments in non-hydrocarbon fields such as culture, tourism,
and sport. Although there is a tendency to use the terms economic diversification and
industrialization interchangeably, there is a difference. According to Hvidt [1], industrializa-
tion aims to increase income and profits, while the aim of diversification is to lower risk by
spreading it over multiple sectors. Hvidt [1] suggests that the overlap in the use of the terms
comes about because industrialization penetrates vertical diversification: there is an interde-
pendent relation between the two processes. In vertical diversification, an increase of volume
in manufacturing or service sectors occurs as a result of industrialization. Hvidt [1]defines
industrialization as “the process of converting to a socioeconomic order in which industry is
dominant”(p.6).
A Historical Overview of Diversification in the Gulf Region
The Gulf region’s pre-oil economy depended mainly on the fishing industry and pearl diving
trade. This region did not establish agriculture due to the harsh climate and the scarcity of the
necessary natural resources. Krane [21] depicts the populations of the Gulf at that time as being
small and struggling with poverty because the economy of the Gulf was undeveloped.
However, Gulf populations managed to survive in this environment quite impressively. The
discoveries of oil in the Gulf region from the 1930s onwards were a turning point for the fate of
these territories. The region has been transformed into a modernized and urban hub. The trend
towards economic diversification in the GCC region has increased as global oil prices have
witnessed a downward trend since 2014. Between 2014 and 2018, oil prices fell by more than
50% from $110 to $50 per barrel [22]. According to Mishrif and Al Balushi [2], the price of a
barrel of oil dropped as low as $27 in 2016.
Circular Economy and Sustainability (2022) 2:221–230
226
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Economic diversification started in the GCC region in the 1970s, during a period of high oil
prices. At that time, Saudi Arabia embarked on its diversification plans to earn revenues from
non-oil resources, focusing on fiscal revenues. Hvidt [1] criticizes Saudi Arabia because, in
spite of having “the longest and most elaborate tradition of planning among the GCC
countries, institutionalized in the Ministry of Economy and Planning (MoEP)”(p.28), it has
not achieved any tangible outcomes. The UAE and Kuwait followed in Saudi Arabia’s
footsteps in this period [23]. There is a long gap between these early diversification efforts
by GCC countries and the latest attempts at diversification in the region. Luciani (2012, cited
in [2]) argues that the GCC countries are slow in the implementation of their diversification
strategies as they are dependent on inconsistent oil revenues: “hence there is no rush to disrupt
their economic system as long as oil rents will continue to be the main source of government
revenues for the foreseeable future”(p.2). It can be inferred that early steps of diversification in
the 1970s in some GCC countries, as mentioned above, took a vertical direction, focusing on
the hydrocarbon energy industry. Mishrif and Al Balushi [2] support this inference, indicating
that huge investments at that time took place in the energy field and related industries such as
petrochemicals, chemicals, fertilizers, and aluminum.
Current Overview of the Saudi Economy
Since oil was first discovered in the region, the economy of Saudi Arabia has been dependent
on oil revenues. Saudi Arabia possesses about 30% of global crude oil and is ranked second in
terms of the global production of crude oil. It also has 22% of proven gas reserves, ranked
sixth in the world [3]. Saudi Arabia’s general budget depends hugely on oil revenues. Euchi,
Omri, and Al-Tit [22] expect that these resources will be depleted in the coming two decades.
Non-oil revenues accounted for only 13% of the Saudi general budget in 2018. Saudi Arabia’s
deficit budget is 4.6% of its total 2018 GDP [23], with the possibility that it could reach 6.4%
or worse in the 2020 general budget. Certain changes have been adopted to curb unnecessary
expenditure in order to adapt to risks related to the fall in global oil prices and the COVID-19
pandemic. These changes will have a direct effect on Saudi Arabia’s debts and will impact
negatively on its foreign exchange reserves. Cahill [24] points out that Saudi Arabia issued $19
billion in debts in 2020 and ponders on the sustainability of the country’s foreign exchange
reserve in light of its sharp decline by $27 billion.
This recent snapshot of the Saudi economy contrasts with the ambitious Saudi National
Vision 2030 [4]. The essence of this vision is to reduce the reliance of the Saudi economy on
oil revenues through economic diversification. The Saudi vision identified several pillars
which are required for implementing a diversified and sustainable economy. These pillars
are founded on the creation of a knowledge-based economy, encouraging entrepreneurship and
enhancing private sector participation, achieving gender equality in the domestic job market,
and investment in non-oil sectors such as tourism [4]. The following section will focus on the
country’s progress in one of these aspects: the creation of a knowledge-based economy.
Creating a Saudi Knowledge-Based Economy
If creating a knowledge-based economy is the cognitive bridge to creating a diversified
economy, then educational reform and investment in R&D provide the infrastructure for
Circular Economy and Sustainability (2022) 2:221–230 227
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
building that knowledge-based economy, which would enable Saudi Arabia to transition away
from an oil-based economy. Wirba [17] argues that success in building a knowledge-based
economy represents the basis for improved global competitiveness. Saudi Arabia was ranked
34th in the 2019 Global Competitiveness Report [20], whereas a country that is one of the G-
20 economies should score a rank among the top 20 globally. One issue, according to Wirba
[17], is that the GCC countries invest relatively little in R&D, despite their abundant economic
and financial resources; Mishrif and Al Balushi [2] corroborate this finding, demonstrating that
the GCC region invests less than 1% of its GDP in R&D.
As discussed above, constructing a knowledge-based economy requires that citizens are
equipped with analytical skills and other key abilities that are demanded by the private sector
and are needed to function in a globalized market. Improving the quality of education requires
investment in education and the setting up of research institutions. This in turn demands a clear
and measurable educational vision. If successful, educational reform will expand knowledge
through unlimited access to information sources. Furthermore, it will distribute educational
roles among multiple players, including the engagement of the private sector, working with the
education ministry.
Saudi Arabia is the largest GCC country in terms of geography and population, which
could be an asset in terms of building a knowledge-based economy; moreover, it is one of only
two GCC countries in which nationals outnumber foreigners, accounting for 69% of the
population [2]. To move towards implementing a knowledge-based economy, Saudi Arabia
has launched reform programs to modernize its educational process, focusing especially on the
higher education curriculum, to encourage a mentality of entrepreneurship to meet the
demands of the job market (particularly in the private sector). Although these are promising
steps towards building a knowledge-based economy, this is likely to be a long and thorny path.
Saudi Arabia has a population of nearly 27 million people, of which Saudi citizens constitute
18.6 million. Although in the long run this might be an asset, the large population, together
with the underdeveloped Saudi economy, has resulted in falling GDP in Saudi Arabia, even
though it is one of the largest exporters of oil [1]. The majority of the population are currently
equipped with a traditional education, which has led to problems such as high youth unem-
ployment, a concentration of jobs offered in the public sector, and an increase in rates of
poverty. The youth unemployment rate in Saudi Arabia is escalating, especially among
females. In 2016–2017, Saudi youth unemployment reached 25% overall, with female youth
unemployment reaching 46.3%. These figures challenge the goals which were set out by the
Saudi National Vision 2030 [4], which include reducing the rate of unemployment from 11.6
to 7% and increasing women’s engagement in the job market from 22 to 30%.
Cowan [25] estimates that between 2 and 4 million Saudis are living in poverty with a daily
income of $17 or less. Mishrif and Al Balushi [2] highlight several factors that thwart the
remodeling of Saudi education and help perpetuate the gap between private-sector job
requirements and the qualifications of potential candidates. They argue that the low-quality
education offered by Saudi educational institutions plays a role in the huge numbers of
unemployed youth; they also draw attention to the absence of a clear educational vision for
delivering innovation and encouraging improved analytical skills among Saudi students.
Furthermore, the burdensome bureaucracy, corruption, and lack of innovation of Saudi
educational institutions add to these problems. Altorki [26] describes how the state in Saudi
Arabia interferes with the curriculum and data with the help of the religious authority “Ulama,”
which limits availability of and access to information. Altorki [26] describes the resulting
pedagogy as “repetitive, redundant, synoptic, synthetic and methodologically narrow”(p.242).
Circular Economy and Sustainability (2022) 2:221–230
228
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Conclusion
The principal aim of economic diversification is to make the economy resilient and robust. A
strategy of economic diversification can sustain economic growth and minimize the risks of
over-reliance on one sector. Recently, the GCC countries have started to look beyond their
dependence on oil revenues, with ambitious national visions reflecting their plans for eco-
nomic diversification. Saudi Arabia’s National Vision 2030 [4] declared that the Saudi
economy would be reformed through economic diversification. To achieve this, several pillars
were identified as the basis for transforming the Saudi economy in order to reduce the risks
associated with reliance on oil revenues. One of these pillars is the establishment of a
knowledge-based economy. The assessment undertaken in this article suggests that the path
will not be smooth. Oil remains the main engine of the Saudi economy. Given the volatility of
global oil prices, the growing deficit in the Saudi general budget, and domestic challenges such
as increasing numbers of unemployed youth and an unreformed educational system, the
process of economic diversification in Saudi Arabia is likely to suffer from setbacks along
the way.
Author Contribution The author contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data
collection, and analysis were performed by the author. The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding Open access funding provided by the Qatar National Library. Open access funding was provided by
the Qatar Read and Publish (Springer Compact) agreement.
Declarations
Consent for Publication The author gives consent for the manuscript to be published. The author is responsible
for the correctness of the statements provided in the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest The author declares no competing interest.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and
indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's
Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included
in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or
exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy
of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
References
1. Hvidt M (2013) Economic diversification in the GCC countries: past record and future trends. Research
paper no 27: Kuwait Programme on Development, Governance and Globalisation in the Gulf States. The
London School of Economics and Political Science, London.
2. Mishrif A, Al Balushi Y (2018) Economic diversification in the Gulf region, II edn. Palgrave Macmillan,
Singapore
3. IRENA (2019) Renewable energy market analysis: GCC. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/
Agency/Publication/2019/Jan/IRENA_Market_Analysis_GCC_2019.pdf. Accessed 19 November 2020.
Circular Economy and Sustainability (2022) 2:221–230 229
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
4. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (2020) Vision 2030.https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/en. Accessed 15 November
2020.
5. Bhujanga Rao A (2008) Research methodology for management and social sciences. Excel Books, New
Delhi
6. Prior L (2008) Repositioning documents in social research. Sociology 42(5):821–836
7. Al-Jundi S (2012) Economic diversification in the United Arab Emirates. Economic Horizons. Center Res
Authentication 33(122):AH1434 2012. 2
8. General Secretariat for Development Planning (GSDP) (2008) Qatar national vision 2030. [online]. http://
www.gsdp.gov.qa/portal/page/portal/gsdp_en/qatar_national_vision/qnv_2030_document on 08/04/2015.
Accessed 10 November 2020
9. UNDP. Sustainable development goals. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-
development-goals.html. Accessed 8 November 2020.
10. Wilhelms C (1966) Development through export diversification: some suggestions. Intereconomics 1(1):9–12
11. Abdennour F (2019) Privatization and economic diversification in Saudi Arabia: an empirical study. Int J
Econ Commer Manag VII(5):113–126
12. Abyad A (2018) Demographic changes in the GCC countries: reflection and futureprojection. Middle East J
Age Ageing 15(1):20–24
13. The Economist Intelligence Unit (2010) The GCC in 2020: broadening the economy. http://graphics.eiu.
com/upload/eb/AVIVA_%20GCC_to_2020_Economic_diversification_in_GCC_WEB.pdf. Accessed 9
November 2020.
14. Kinninmont J (2015) Future trends in the Gulf. Chatham House, London
15. The World Bank (2020) Global economic prospects: slow growth, policy challenges. World Bank,
Washington
16. SWFI (2020) What is a sovereign wealth fund? Swfinstitute.org.https://www.swfinstitute.org/research/
sovereign-wealth-fund. Accessed 19 November 2020
17. Wirba A (2017) The role of research in knowledge economy within GCC countries. Eur J Bus Manag 9(3):
166–184
18. Ozili P (2021) Circular economy, banks, and other financial institutions: what’s in it for them? Circ Econ
Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00043-y
19. Al-Saidi M, Das P, Saadaoui I (2021) Circular economy in basic supply: framing the approach for the water
and food sectors of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Sustain Prod Consum 27:1273–1285. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.004
20. Schwab K (2019) The global competitiveness report 2019. World Economic Forum, Geneva
21. Krane J (2019) Energy kingdoms. Columbia University Press, New York
22. Euchi J, Omri A, Al-Tit A (2018) The pillars of economic diversification in Saudi Arabia. World Rev Sci
Technol Sustain Dev 14(4):330
23. Hussein B (2020) Energy sector diversification: meeting demographic challenges in the MENA region.
Atlantic Council, Washington. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/
Diversification-final-web-version.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2020.
24. Cahill B (2020) Gulf states: Managing the oil crash [online]. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
https://www.csis.org/analysis/gulf-states-managing-oil-crash. Accessed 15 November 2020.
25. Cowan D (2018) The coming economic implosion of Saudi Arabia: a behavioral perspective. Boston
College, Boston
26. Altorki S (2013) Taking stock: Whither the social sciences in Gulf universities. Contemp Arab Affairs 6(2):
237–250
Circular Economy and Sustainability (2022) 2:221–230
230
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Terms and Conditions
Springer Nature journal content, brought to you courtesy of Springer Nature Customer Service Center
GmbH (“Springer Nature”).
Springer Nature supports a reasonable amount of sharing of research papers by authors, subscribers
and authorised users (“Users”), for small-scale personal, non-commercial use provided that all
copyright, trade and service marks and other proprietary notices are maintained. By accessing,
sharing, receiving or otherwise using the Springer Nature journal content you agree to these terms of
use (“Terms”). For these purposes, Springer Nature considers academic use (by researchers and
students) to be non-commercial.
These Terms are supplementary and will apply in addition to any applicable website terms and
conditions, a relevant site licence or a personal subscription. These Terms will prevail over any
conflict or ambiguity with regards to the relevant terms, a site licence or a personal subscription (to
the extent of the conflict or ambiguity only). For Creative Commons-licensed articles, the terms of
the Creative Commons license used will apply.
We collect and use personal data to provide access to the Springer Nature journal content. We may
also use these personal data internally within ResearchGate and Springer Nature and as agreed share
it, in an anonymised way, for purposes of tracking, analysis and reporting. We will not otherwise
disclose your personal data outside the ResearchGate or the Springer Nature group of companies
unless we have your permission as detailed in the Privacy Policy.
While Users may use the Springer Nature journal content for small scale, personal non-commercial
use, it is important to note that Users may not:
use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale
basis or as a means to circumvent access control;
use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any
jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil liability, or is otherwise unlawful;
falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association
unless explicitly agreed to by Springer Nature in writing;
use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a
systematic database of Springer Nature journal content.
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a
product or service that creates revenue, royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as
part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain. Springer Nature journal content cannot be
used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal content on a large
scale into their, or any other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not
obligated to publish any information or content on this website and may remove it or features or
functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or without notice. Springer Nature may revoke
this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature journal content
which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or
guarantees to Users, either express or implied with respect to the Springer nature journal content and
all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law, including
merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published
by Springer Nature that may be licensed from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a
regular basis or in any other manner not expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer
Nature at
onlineservice@springernature.com
Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.