ArticlePDF Available

CYBER BULLYING: CAUSES, PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT AND REMEDIES

Authors:
  • The Oxford College of Business Management

Abstract

Cyberbullying has been analysed as a critical problem amongst youngsters in these years. The article addresses some common issues in cyberbullying. The purpose of the article is to explore the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health/ We have discussed the definition of cyberbullying and its basic characteristics and how it is different from traditional bullying, the different kinds of cyberbullying and the psychological trauma on the victims. Few reasons of why people bully other are also analysed. This article also reviews various types of cyberbullying. These issues will be discussed from a theoretical point of view with reference to current literature. In finding and conclusion we are going to discuss the importance of preventing cyberbullying and prevention method for helping adolescents to face this problem. This kind of information can be used to increase the knowledge of practitioners, health care givers, educators, and scholars, and subsequently better inform prevention and intervention efforts related to reducing cyberbullying and its associated harm. Introduction The Internet has provided us with infinite additional prospects than ever before. data, education, games, and social interactions is simply accessed at any time or place by merely going online. These prospects are usually considered as advantageous for many people, and allowing them to access data at a way quicker rate than previous generations. However, despite the wide breath of opportunities the internet provides us, there has been concern concerning the potential for abuse (Slonje et al., 2013). Lately, new mean to bother others has occurred with the extensive suitability of on-line socializing and researchers across the world concerning the psychological impact on internet users In the same way traditional bullying (or face-to-face bullying together with physical, verbal and relational bullying), cyberbullying is believed to have bad or negative consequences for the psychological, social and physical health of both the parties involve bullies and victims (Bauman et al., 2013; Tokunaga, 2010). In general, unclear laws and rapid developments in information and communication technology (ICT) devices have let this social risk go widely unnoticed for a long period of time (Stewart and Fritsch, 2011). The word 'cyberbullying' did not even exist a decade ago (Notar et al., 2013) and only recently have studies began to analyse its impact and identify it as a significant social problem. Some literature reviews have emerged that describe the development in terms of its definition, effects, and intervention strategies (Cassidy et al., 2013; von Marées and Petermann, 2012) The standing article speaks on a conversant review of the available literature on cyberbullying, in terms of appropriate features and the psychological influence on young victims. In addition to this we have discussed the already existing technique and prevention strategies currently available and suggest remedies to treat psychological impact as a potentially efficient way to coping with the associated distress.
Dogo Rangsang Research Journal UGC Care Group I Journal
ISSN : 2347-7180 Vol-11 Issue-05 No. 03 May 2021
Page | 88 Copyright @ 2021 Authors
CYBER BULLYING: CAUSES, PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT AND REMEDIES
Dr.Veto Dey Assistant Professor Department of Management studies,T.John College, Bangalore,
taragem3@gmail.com,8792195459
Dr.Yogita Gupta, Academic Consultant dryogitagupta25@gmail.com 9890665549
Abstract
Cyberbullying has been analysed as a critical problem amongst youngsters in these years. The article
addresses some common issues in cyberbullying. The purpose of the article is to explore the impact
of cyberbullying on adolescent health/ We have discussed the definition of cyberbullying and its
basic characteristics and how it is different from traditional bullying, the different kinds of
cyberbullying and the psychological trauma on the victims. Few reasons of why people bully other
are also analysed. This article also reviews various types of cyberbullying. These issues will be
discussed from a theoretical point of view with reference to current literature. In finding and
conclusion we are going to discuss the importance of preventing cyberbullying and prevention
method for helping adolescents to face this problem. This kind of information can be used to increase
the knowledge of practitioners, health care givers, educators, and scholars, and subsequently better
inform prevention and intervention efforts related to reducing cyberbullying and its associated harm.
Introduction
The Internet has provided us with infinite additional prospects than ever before. data, education,
games, and social interactions is simply accessed at any time or place by merely going online.
These prospects are usually considered as advantageous for many people, and allowing them to
access data at a way quicker rate than previous generations. However, despite the wide breath of
opportunities the internet provides us, there has been concern concerning the potential for abuse
(Slonje et al., 2013). Lately, new mean to bother others has occurred with the
extensive suitability of on-line socializing and researchers across the world concerning the
psychological impact on internet users
In the same way traditional bullying (or face-to-face bullying together with physical, verbal and
relational bullying), cyberbullying is believed to have bad or negative consequences for the
psychological, social and physical health of both the parties involve bullies and victims (Bauman et
al., 2013; Tokunaga, 2010). In general, unclear laws and rapid developments in information and
communication technology (ICT) devices have let this social risk go widely unnoticed for a long
period of time (Stewart and Fritsch, 2011). The word ‘cyberbullying’ did not even exist a decade ago
(Notar et al., 2013) and only recently have studies began to analyse its impact and identify it as a
significant social problem. Some literature reviews have emerged that describe the development in
terms of its definition, effects, and intervention strategies (Cassidy et al., 2013; von Marées and
Petermann, 2012)
The standing article speaks on a conversant review of the available literature on cyberbullying, in
terms of appropriate features and the psychological influence on young victims. In addition to this
we have discussed the already existing technique and prevention strategies currently available and
suggest remedies to treat psychological impact as a potentially efficient way to coping with the
associated distress.
Cyberbullying: Psychological Impact
Adolescents in the all over the world using the Internet not as an additional tool in everyday
communication (cyber utilization) but using it as a “primary and necessary” mode of communication
this paradigm shift from one-to-one interaction to online communication has created a very different
and potentially harmful environment for social relationships, this environment that has recently been
explored in the literature as cyberbullying and Internet harassment. I t has a psychological impact on
victims Although the psychological impact of cyberbullying appear to be very similar to those of
Dogo Rangsang Research Journal UGC Care Group I Journal
ISSN : 2347-7180 Vol-11 Issue-05 No. 03 May 2021
Page | 89 Copyright @ 2021 Authors
traditional bullying, being a victim of cyberbullying has a broader negative influence on adolescents'
psychosocial behaviour than traditional bullying (Mishna et al., 2011; Campbell et al., 2012).
Victims of cyberbullying states more social and emotional problems, such as isolation and emotion
regulation problems, than victims who are being bullied in traditional way (Ak et al., 2015; Elipe et
al., 2015). Research has also thrown light on that cyberbullying has negative consequences for both
the physical health and psychological adjustment of victims (Tsaousis, 2016). Many reports have
been received from young people who reported sleep problem, and bed-wetting than their non-
victimized peers (Monks et al., 2009). Adolescent who are victims of cyberbullying faces risk of
depression, anxiety and abuse (Takizawa et al., 2014; Palermiti et al., 2017). Additionally, some of
other effects are even stronger than what is seen with traditional bullying, as the victim usually
cannot escape the abusive situation. Young victims are nearly twice as likely to think about extreme
steps like suicide than their peers. Many young victims show sign of self-harm such as cutting,
banging their head and even hitting themselves. They are also significantly more inclined to consume
products for relief of their psychological pain. Some of the other symptoms may include
Feelings of distress about the bullying
Increased feelings of depression and mood swings
Increased feelings of anxiety
Problems dropping numb or remaining numb (e.g., insomnia)
Suicidal ideation or suicide attempt
Increased feelings of fearfulness
Feelings of low self-worth
Social loneliness, thinning from friend groups, or spending a lot of time alone
Avoiding doing things that they used to enjoy
Poor academic performance
Problems in relationships with family members and friends
Symptoms of post-traumatic stress
Self-harm (e.g., cutting, hitting yourself, headbanging)
Substance abuse
Increased moods swings like anger, irritability, or angry outbursts
Why people become cyberbully
Cyberbullying is simpler to do than conventional acts of bullying because the perpetrator doesn’t
need to face the victim face to face. It can also be perpetrated anonymously, so victims often don’t
know the identity of perpetrator. Perpetrators get to work outside the view of adults making it harder
for parents to recognized and address it, when the adolescent are being victimized. For victims
themselves, they feel there’s no place to go. As the internet is available all the time. That means the
online abuse is continuous, and may go on. Cyber bullying has the potential to succeed in large
audiences and cause more damage to its victims, especially if it goes viral. Becoming a cyberbully
have very less barrier for their entry. Anyone with access to the Internet can get started. The
numerous psychological effects are often devastating to victims no matter age, and it seems no one
is immune to the kind of trauma it causes. However, because kids and teens are still learning to
regulate their emotions and responses to social interactions, they are particularly vulnerable and
highly at risk. Research shows that the common reason for cyberbullying is the result of damaged
relationships, due to breakups or unresolved conflicts. Certain groups are especially vulnerable and
often targeted.
Remedies
Internet is filled with thousands or more of people who have witnessed the rude form of
cyberbullying. There are different ways to handle it but adolescent do not realize to tackle it. If
adolescent is a victim of cyberbullying take action, talk to victim even if it feels awkward. Approach
the conversation gently, allowing the person to explain the situation in his or her own words. Assure
Dogo Rangsang Research Journal UGC Care Group I Journal
ISSN : 2347-7180 Vol-11 Issue-05 No. 03 May 2021
Page | 90 Copyright @ 2021 Authors
the person that their value as a person has nothing to do with being teased or harassed. Let them
understand them that retaliation or responding to a bully can actually make the situation worse. Make
them understand that everyone has their own belief or views. Encourage them to keep record of all
the incident by saving and taking screen shots of unkind texts, saving emails, photos and other
unwelcome images. Save the web address of the negative messages or the link from where came it
came could be helpful. Immediately report the case of cyberbullying to teachers or even if u suspect
any kind of cyberbully inform adult and administrators at your school and college school. Education
Institute psychologists and school, college counsellors act as agents of social justice in schools to
prevent cyberbullying, particularly among the most vulnerable populations.
In the worst cases, it is better to take the help of law enforcement officials and keep records of any
and all conversations. Most of all assure that young one that bullying in any form is hurtful and
wrong, and that they are never to blame for the immature and cruel behaviour of their peers. When
children and adolescents are asked what they will do if they are cyberbullied, the most of them have
suggested ways of coping has been through different method of protecting themselves technically
from harassment online (Aricak et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2008). There are different technical
solutions that consist of blocking certain people from contacting you online, or the password can be
changed, user can change their names or e-mail addresses and just omitting anonymous text
messages without reading them. Smith et al. (2008) asked respondents to select the best possible
ways to discourage cyberbullying from a list of suggestions produced by focus groups; ‘blocking
messages/identities’ was the option chosen by most respondents. Aricak et al. (2008) also found this
strategy to be very effective on cyberbullying. (Elbedour et al., 2020). Many of the strategy were
discussed by cyber victim which include switching one’s name on online accounts or taking another
phone number (Aricak et al., 2008; Juvoven & Gross, 2008; Smith et al., 2008). Some victims have
selected more straight ways of online coping such as replying them online, telling the bully to stop
(Aricak et al., 2008) or even bullying them back (Dehue, Bollman, & Völlink, 2008). As the
responsibility of adults, they should encourage victims to tell their teacher or parent if they are the
victim of cyberbully. This result in accomplishment of traditional bullying; although many victims
are unwilling to tell adults about their victimization, especially older pupils and boys (Smith & Shu,
2000). Slonje and Smith (2012) found that victim is not willing to tell to be even more marked in
cyberbullying, and in their studied sample not a single cyber victim had said an adult at school about
being targeted. It should be encouraged to share their felling with some adults or with person they are
comfortable.
Conclusion
Cyberbullying has exposed itself as a new-fangled form of bullying within the last decade. It is
become now an international public health concern among adolescents and so it needs continuous
research. Cyberbullying can cause fear, low self-esteem, social isolation, bad academic performance.
It can also cause difficulty in creating healthy relationships and most importantly, victims can
develop severe symptoms of post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression. Cyber laws are well
drafted and can be utilized at time if awareness is there. There is need for defining and creating
awareness about the prevention methods of cyberbullying through intervention techniques,
cyberbullying therapy and laws. The technology advancement has increased the chances of
cyberllying and it is taking uglier shape so it is need of time to address it soon. It should explore
more in details about the motives of cyberbullying. this will be an important and exciting research
that may help us minimize the abuse of new technologies and ensure that cyberspace is primarily
satisfying place for getting valuable of information.
References
Aricak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Saribeyoglu, S., Ciplak, S., & Yilmaz, N. (2008).
Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 253261
Dogo Rangsang Research Journal UGC Care Group I Journal
ISSN : 2347-7180 Vol-11 Issue-05 No. 03 May 2021
Page | 91 Copyright @ 2021 Authors
Ak, S., Özdemir, Y., and Kuzucu, Y. (2015). Cybervictimization and cyberbullying: the mediating
role of anger, don't anger me! Comp. Hum. Behav. 49, 437443.
Cassidy, W., Faucher, C., Jackson, M., 2013. Cyberbullying among youth: a comprehensive review
of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. Sch.
Psychol. Int. 34 (6), 575612.
Dehue, F., Bollman, C., & Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ experience and parental
perception. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11, 217223.
Elbedour, S., Alqahtani, S., Rihan, I. E. S., Bawalsah, J. A., Booker-Ammah, B., & Turner Jr, J. F.
(2020). Cyberbullying: Roles of school psychologists and school counselors in addressing a
pervasive social justice issue. Children and youth services review, 109, 104720.
Elipe, P., Mora-Merchán, J. A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., and Casas, J. A. (2015). Perceived emotional
intelligence as a moderator variable between cybervictimization and its emotional impact. Front.
Psychol. 6:486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00486.
Johansson, S., & Englund, G. (2020). Cyberbullying and its relationship with physical, verbal, and
relational bullying: a structural equation modelling approach. Educational Psychology, 1-18.
Juvoven, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78,
496505
Mishna, F., Cook, C., Saini, M., Wu, M., and MacFadden, R. (2011). Interventions to prevent and
reduce cyber abuse of youth: a systematic review. Res. Soc. Work. Pract. 21, 514.
Monks, C. P., Smith, P. K., Naylor, P., Barter, C., Ireland, J. L., and Coyne, I. (2009). Bullying in
different contexts: commonalities, differences and the role of theory. Aggress. Violent Behav. 14,
146156.
Notar, C.E., Padgett, S., Roden, J., 2013. Cyberbullying: a review of the literature. Univ. J. Educ.
Res. 1 (1), 19.
Patchin, J. W., and Hinduja, S. (2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem. J. Sch. Health 80, 614621.
doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00548.
Palermiti, A. L., Servidio, R., Bartolo, M. G., and Costabile, A. (2017). Cyberbullying and self-
esteem: an Italian study. Comp. Hum. Behav. 69, 136141.
Takizawa, R., Maughan, B., and Arseneault, L. (2014). Adult health outcomes of childhood bullying
victimization: evidence from a five-decade longitudinal British birth cohort. Am. J. Psychiat. 171,
777784.
Tsaousis, I. (2016). The relationship of self-esteem to bullying perpetration and peer victimization
among schoolchildren and adolescents: a meta-analytic review. Aggress. Violent Behav. 37, 186
199.
Slonje, R., Smith, P.K., Frisén, A., 2013. The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention.
Comput. Hum. Behav. 29 (1), 2632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb. 2012.05.024
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., and Tippett, N. (2008).
Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 49,
376385. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.
Stewart, D.M., Fritsch, E.J., 2011. School and law enforcement efforts to combat cyberbullying.
Prev. Sch. Fail. 55 (2), 7987.
Smith, P. K., & Shu, S. (2000). What good schools can do about bullying. Childhood, 7, 193212
Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisen, A. (2012). Processes of cyberbullying, and feelings of remorse by
bullies: A pilot study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 244259.
von Marées, N., Petermann, F., 2012. Cyberbullying: an increasing challenge for schools. Sch.
Psychol. Int. 33 (5), 467476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0143034312445241.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The article focuses on the contentious relation between cyberbullying and physical, verbal, and relational bullying. Drawing on items from the Olweus questionnaire, the study used confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling, and latent factors of bullying were fitted to the data. Different background variables were related to cyberbullying and traditional bullying factors. The results revealed high correlations between physical, verbal, and relational bullying. While the relations between cyberbullying and physical and verbal bullying were modest to moderate, a substantial correlation between cyberbullying and relational bullying was observed (.69). Further, it was noted that the level of anxiety had a stronger relation with the cyberbullying factor, while number of friends was similarly related to all four bullying factors. The implications of the high relation between cyber and relational bullying, as well as their similar association with the covariates, were discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Cyberbullying research is rapidly expanding with many studies being published from around the world in the past five or six years. In this article we review the current international literature published in English, with particular attention to the following themes: The relationship of cyberbullying to the more traditional face-to-face bullying, including differences and similarities; the impacts of cyberbullying on victims, bullies, schools, families, and communities; coping strategies for victims, schools, and parents; and solutions, both effective and ineffective. A focus of this article is evidence-based prevention and intervention strategies, which may be employed by educators, psychological service providers, and by parents to counter the problem of cyberbullying. Here we address the importance of school and home culture, modelling, curriculum development in information and communication technology (ICT) and social media, peer and bystander education, and other non-punitive approaches. We conclude with a discussion of implications on policy and practice and future research directions.
Article
Full-text available
The negative effects of traditional bullying and, recently, cyberbullying on victims are well-documented, and abundant empirical evidence for it exists. Cybervictimization affects areas such as academic performance, social integration and self-esteem, and causes emotions ranging from anger and sadness to more complex problems such as depression. However, not all victims are equally affected, and the differences seem to be due to certain situational and personal characteristics. The objective of this study is to analyze the relationship between perceived emotional intelligence (PEI) and the emotional impact of cybervictimization. We hypothesize that EI, which has previously been found to play a role in traditional bullying and cyberbullying, may also affect the emotional impact of cyberbullying. The participants in our study were 636 university students from two universities in the south of Spain. Three self-report questionnaires were used: the "European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire," the "Cyberbullying Emotional Impact Scale"; and "Trait Meta-Mood Scale-24." Structural Equation Models were used to test the relationships between the analyzed variables. The results support the idea that PEI, by way of a moderator effect, affects the relationship between cybervictimization and emotional impact. Taken together, cybervictimization and PEI explain much of the variance observed in the emotional impact in general and in the negative dimensions of that impact in particular. Attention and Repair were found to be inversely related to Annoyance and Dejection, and positively related to Invigoration. Clarity has the opposite pattern; a positive relationship with Annoyance and Dejection and an inverse relationship with Invigoration. Various hypothetical explanations of these patterns are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
The use of information and communication technology (ICT) has not only brought advantages to mankind. One downside is the emergence and increase of cyberbullying in schools. Affecting students of all ages, teachers, parents, and other educators, this special form of bullying is an increasing challenge for schools. This article offers an overview of the current state of research regarding prevalence and forms of cyberbullying; its psychosocial correlates in victims, bullies, and bully-victims; possible avenues for prevention and intervention approaches for school practitioners; and implications for future research.
Article
Bullying perpetration and peer victimization has long been considered an important social and clinical problem. Children and adolescents who are bullied are at increased risk for mental health problems. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between self-esteem and bullying behavior (i.e. perpetration and peer victimization) using meta-analytic procedures. Online databases up to June 2014 were searched, and bibliographies of retrieved studies were examined, for studies that examined the association between self-esteem and bullying perpetration/peer victimization in children and adolescents. From an original pool of 936 studies, 121 non duplicated studies were identified that met criteria for inclusion. Possible moderators (e.g. age, source of bullying assessment, year of publication, etc.) were also examined. In the analyses, using a random-effects model, it was found that peer victimization is negatively associated with self-esteem, with a mean effect size of r = ? 0.27. A negative but trivial association was also found (r = ? 0.07) between bullying behavior and self-esteem. Results of various sensitivity analyses revealed these effects to be robust, with little evidence of selection (publication) bias. The implications of the meta-analytic findings for future research on bullying perpetration and peer victimization prevention are discussed.
Article
Recent research has revealed relationship between cybervictimization and cyberbullying, but the possible role of anger as a mediating factor between cybervictimization and cyberbullying remains an area for further clarification. The purpose of this study was to analyze the direct and indirect relationships among cybervictimization, anger expression styles, and cyberbullying, and to test whether anger expression styles mediates the relationship between cybervictimization and cyberbullying in the context of General Strain Theory (GST). Data for the present study were collected from 687 undergraduate students with a mean age of 22.45 years (SD = 2.42). Participants completed cyberbullying, cybervictimization and anger expression scales. Structural equation modeling was used to test two models: one to examine direct and indirect relationships and one to examine only indirect relationships in which cyberbullying predicted anger-in and anger-out which in turn predicted cyberbullying. Analyses of fit indices showed that both models were adequate fits for the data. The findings provide evidence of direct effects of cybervictimization on cyberbullying and indirect effects of cybervictimization on cyberbullying mediated by anger-in. Specifically, results showed that cybervictimization was positively and directly related to anger-in and anger-out, and indirectly related to cyberbullying through anger-in. Prevention programs in schools can be applied to improve students’ emotion regulation and anger control, not only in the context of overt aggression, but also in cyberspace.
Article
Objective: The authors examined midlife outcomes of childhood bullying victimization. Method: Data were from the British National Child Development Study, a 50-year prospective cohort of births in 1 week in 1958. The authors conducted ordinal logistic and linear regressions on data from 7,771 participants whose parents reported bullying exposure at ages 7 and 11 years, and who participated in follow-up assessments between ages 23 and 50 years. Outcomes included suicidality and diagnoses of depression, anxiety disorders, and alcohol dependence at age 45; psychological distress and general health at ages 23 and 50; and cognitive functioning, socioeconomic status, social relationships, and well-being at age 50. Results: Participants who were bullied in childhood had increased levels of psychological distress at ages 23 and 50. Victims of frequent bullying had higher rates of depression (odds ratio=1.95, 95% CI=1.27-2.99), anxiety disorders (odds ratio=1.65, 95% CI=1.25-2.18), and suicidality (odds ratio=2.21, 95% CI=1.47-3.31) than their nonvictimized peers. The effects were similar to those of being placed in public or substitute care and an index of multiple childhood adversities, and the effects remained significant after controlling for known correlates of bullying victimization. Childhood bullying victimization was associated with a lack of social relationships, economic hardship, and poor perceived quality of life at age 50. Conclusions: Children who are bullied-and especially those who are frequently bullied-continue to be at risk for a wide range of poor social, health, and economic outcomes nearly four decades after exposure. Interventions need to reduce bullying exposure in childhood and minimize long-term effects on victims' well-being; such interventions should cast light on causal processes.