Content uploaded by Hatice Gündüz
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Hatice Gündüz on Nov 17, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
J Food Process Preserv. 2021;45:e15878. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jfpp
|
1 of 10
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.15878
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
1 | INTRODUCTION
Sous- vide which means “under vacuum,” and sous- vide process-
ing is defined as “raw materials or raw materials with intermediate
foods that are cooked under controlled conditions of tempera-
ture and time inside heat- stable vacuumized pouches.” Sous- vide
processing prevents evaporative losses of moisture and volatile
components during the cooking of foods. It also retains the color
and texture properties of the product and limits the risk of cross-
contamination during storage. In this way, delicious and nutritious
products are obtained (Baldwin, 2012; Schellekens, 1996; Sun
et al., 2019).
Although Sous- vide Technology offers products with enhancing
nutritional value, high quality and extended shelf life, pathogen mi-
croorganisms may grow that can cause health hazards due to low
temperature applied to products in a short time. Therefore, the
temperature- time parameters and the use of antimicrobials are very
important in the cooking process (Church, 1998).
Most of the essential oils and their components exhibit antibac-
terial properties and these are used for the inhibition of pathogenic
Received:24July2019
|
Revised:8M arch2021
|
Accepted:1August2021
DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.15878
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The effects of essential oils on inactivation of Listeria
monocytogenes in rainbow trout cooked with sous- vide
Fatma Öztürk1 | Hatice Gündüz1 | Göknur Sürengil1,2
1Department of Fisheries and Fish
Processing Technology, Faculty of Fisheries,
Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey
2Department of Fishing and Processing
Technology,FacultyofEğirdirFisheries,
University of Isparta Applied Sciences,
Isparta, Turkey
Correspondence
Fatma Öztürk, Faculty of Fisheries,
Department of Fisheries and Fish Processing
Technology, Izmir Katip Celebi University,
Izmir, Turkey.
Email: fatma.ozturk@ikc.edu.tr
Funding information
İzmirKatipÇelebiUniversity,Grant/Award
N u m b e r : 2 0 1 6 - G A P - S U Ü F - 0 0 1 8
Abstract
This study investigated the combined effect of four different natural antimicrobial
essential oil (Rosemary, Coriander, Basil and Laurel) and two different cooking tem-
peratures (50℃ and 55℃) on inactivating of Listeria monocytogenes in rainbow trout.
The products prepared with this technology were stored at +4℃ for 36 days and the
number of L. monocytogenes was determined. As a result of this study, laurel essential
oil was found to be effective on L. monocytogenes invitro whereas coriander essen-
tial oil was found to be effective on L. monocytogenes in sous- vide applied trout. In
addition, coriander essential oil addition (2 times more than the minimum inhibition
concentration value) and 7 min sous- vide application in 55℃ was effective for the
inhibition of L. monocytogenes in sous- vide applied trouts. Consequently, the findings
indicated that the use of coriander essential oil in sous- vide trout fillets was effective
to ensure of L. monocytogenes control.
Practical applications
Sous- vide technology is a long- term cooking method in vacuum- packed food at low
temperatures. Thanks to this application, since the products are cooked in vacuum
packaging, the unique aroma and nutritional components of the foods are not lost.
This technology offers products with high nutritional value, quality, and high shelf
life. Although it is more advantageous than traditional cooking methods, if the ap-
plied temperature is low and the time is insufficient, pathogenic microorganisms de-
velop and pose a threat to health. For this reason, the temperature- time parameters
and the use of antimicrobials used in cooking are of great importance. In this re-
search, it was determined that the development of Listeria monocytogenes in seafood
was prevented by using essential oils with sous- vide technology.
17454549, 2021, 10, Downloaded from https://ifst.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpp.15878 by Izmir Katip Celebi University Kutuphane Ve Dokumantasyon, Wiley Online Library on [16/11/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
2 of 10
|
ÖZTÜRK e T al.
bacteria in foods (Amoroso et al., 2019; Burt, 2004). Increasing con-
sumer demand for the use of natural antimicrobials instead of chem-
ical antimicrobial agents has led to the widespread use of essential
oilsasadditivesinfoods(Gouveiaetal.,2017).
Many studies have focused on the quality of vegetables, meat and
meat products prepared with sous- vide technology (Alahakoon et al.,
2018, 2019; Ismail et al., 2019; Martínez- Hernández et al., 2013;
Muñoz et al., 2017; Oliveira et al., 2013; Rinaldi et al., 2013, 2014).
The effects of different temperature- time combinations on physical,
chemical and microbiological quality parameters were investigated
in the studies conducted on the use of this technology in seafood
(Cetinkaya et al., 2015; Gonzalez-Fandos et al., 2004, 2005; Mol
et al., 2012). In another study, the effect of lemon juice on the qual-
ity of whiting fish cooked in a vacuum was determined (Cosansu
et al., 2013). However, there are few studies on the inactivation of
Listeria monocytogenes in products prepared with sous- vide (Ben
Embarek & Huss, 1993; Bolton et al., 200 0; Hansen & Knochel, 2001;
Nyatı,2000).L. monocytogenes is one of the high temperature resis-
tant foodborne pathogens which is also capable of developing during
refrigeration temperature. Therefore, the development of heat-
resistant L. monocytogenes in sous- vide products, which are mild heat
treated and stored in the cold, is a concern (Hansen & Knochel, 2001).
It is known that the effect of essential oils in the control of patho-
genic microorganisms in foods is very important and there are many
researches on this subject (Abdollahzadeh et al., 2014; Azeredo
et al., 2011; Da Silveira et al., 2014; De Medeiros Ba rbosa et al., 2016;
Dussaultetal.,2014;Ghabraieetal.,2016;Gilletal.,2002;Gutierrez
et al., 2008; Khalil et al., 2018; Mazzarrino et al., 2015; Ouibrahim
et al., 2013; Pesavento et al., 2015; Tosun et al., 2018). However,
only a few studies have been performed on the use of essential oils
on the inactivation of L. monocytogenes, which is a significant prob-
lem in foods that are ready- to- eat products and processed at low
temperatures-timeswithsous-videapplication(Gouveiaetal.,2016,
2017). No studies have been conducted to use the essential oils in
the control of L. monocytogenes in the seafood applied sous- vide.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of antimicrobial
essential oils and different temperature applications on the inactiva-
tion of L. monocytogenes in vacuum- packed cooked trout fillets. For
this purpose, rosemary, coriander, basil, and laurel essential oils were
added to the trout fi llets and vacuum p acked, then cooked at different
temperatures (50℃ and 55℃) in a stability time (7 min). After cook-
ing, the cooled products were stored at +4℃ and L. monocytogenes
counts were determined on 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 22, 29, and 36 days.
2 | MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 | Material
2.1.1 | Fishmaterialandessentialoils
Rainbow trout fillets (approximately, 40 fillets) were purchased from
a fish processing plant in Turkey, and they were transferred to the
laboratory (for sous- vide application and analysis) in polystyrene
boxes containing ice. Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), coriander
(Coriandrum sativum), basil (Ocimum basilicum), and laurel (Laurus no-
bilis) essential oils were obtained from a commercial company.
2.1.2 | Testmicroorganismsandmedia
In the study, the strain of L. monocytogenes ATCC 7644 was obtained
from a commercial company. Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB, Merck), Tryptic
Soy Agar ( TSB, Merck), Müller Hilton Agar (MHA , Merck), and Müller
Hilton Broth (MHB, Merck) media were used for the activation of
bacteria and measurement of the antibacterial activity of essential
oils.
2.2 | Methods
2.2.1 | Determinationofbiochemicalcompositionof
essential oils
GC-MSanalysiswasperformedtodeterminethemaincomponents
of essenti al oils. GC-MS assays we re perfor med using the A gilent
5975CS eries GC-MSD sy stem (7890A GC an d 5975Cine rt MSD)
equipped with HP- 5MS capillary (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness
0.50 µm). The sample injection volume was 1 µl. The initial oven tem-
perature was programmed at 60℃, in 3 degree increments, the final
temperature was brought to 260℃ and terminated. MS transfer line
temperature was set at 230℃. The MS system was operated in scan
mode with a mass range of 40– 400 m/z. Helium was used as carrier
gas. The inlet temperature was 250℃.
2.2.2 | Preparationofbacterialinoculum
Stock cultures of L. monocytogenes in liquid form were maintained
at−20± 2℃ in TSB medium containing glycerol (20%; v/v). For ex-
periments, 100 µl of stock cultures were transferred to 10 ml of TSB
medium and incubated at 30℃ for 24 hr to activate the bacteria.
The active bacterial cultures were transferred to centrifuge tubes at
10 ml each and centrifuged for 15 min at 6,000 rpm (Hermle Z206A).
Cell pellets suspended using physiological saline (PSW ) were washed
twice again by centrifugation. After centrifugation, PSW was added
to the pellet fraction obtained and the cell densities were adjusted to
0.5 Mcfarland (108 CFU/ml) turbidity so the bacteria inoculum was
prepared for the experiments.
2.2.3 | Determinationofantibacterialeffectsof
essential oils
Disk diffusion method (Kirby- Bauer method)
Disc diffusion method was used to determine the antibacterial activ-
ity of essential oils. Active cultures of L. monocytogenes ATCC 7644
were adjusted to 0.5 Mcfarland standard density by diluting with
17454549, 2021, 10, Downloaded from https://ifst.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpp.15878 by Izmir Katip Celebi University Kutuphane Ve Dokumantasyon, Wiley Online Library on [16/11/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
|
3 of 10
ÖZTÜRK e T al.
sterile PSW. In this way, the prepared bacterial inoculum was applied
to petri dishes containing MHA by means of sterile swab rod. 20 µl of
essential oil was impregnated into sterile empty discs placed in petri
dishes. Sterile 10% DMSO (Dimethyl Sulphoxide) was used as a neg-
ative control. Sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SXT, 25 µg), ampi-
cillin (AMP; 10 µg) and erythromycin (E, 15 µg) discs were used as
positive controls. The medium was incubated at 30℃ for 24– 48 hr.
After the incubation, the zone diameters were determined and anti-
bacterial activity was determined.
Minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal
concentration (MBC)
MIC and MBC were used to determine the in vitro activity of essen-
tial oils. MIC values of essential oils were determined by the macro
dilution method (Baron & Finegold, 1990). The lowest essential
oil concentration without microbial growth was evaluated by MIC
value. Stock solutions of essential oils (100 mg/ml) were prepared
using 10% DMSO. 570 µl of MHB was transferred to each of the
15 sterile test tubes. Two- fold serial dilutions were made by add-
ing 600 µl of the stock solution of essential oils to the first tube,
and added dilutions with essential oils. L. monocytogenes ATCC 7644
strain was added to 30 µl of 106 log CFU/g on each dilution tube and
incubated at 30℃ for 24 hr (Oke et al., 2009). After incubation, the
bacterial development of the tubes was evaluated visually also the
final dilution without development was accepted as MIC value. In
addition, after incubation each dilution tube was transferred to ster-
ile cuvettes, then the absorbance values were evaluated the 543 nm
wavelength by spectrophotometer. The visually determined MIC
value was compared and verified with the MIC value determined by
the optical density. 600 µl MHB + 600 µl essential oil as negative
control; 600 µl MHB + 30 µl bacteria and 600 µl MHB + 600 µl 10%
DMSO containing tubes were used as positive control. Trials were
performed as two replicates for each essential oils (Oke et al., 2009).
The lowest concentration of non- reproduction was determined
as MBC by sowing to the PALCAM Agar from the determined
MIC concentration and their upper concentrations (García-Díez
et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2012).
2.2.4 | Determinationoftheeffectofsous-vide
technology and essential oil supplementation on
L. monocytogenes in fish fillets
Preparation of sous- vide fish fillets
L. monocytogenes were grown in TSB medium at 30℃ for 24 hr. The
active cultures were centrifuged for 15 min at 6,000 rpm. The cell
pellets were adjusted to 0.5 Mcfarland (108 CFU/ml) standard den-
sity by diluting with PSW. Fish fillets were cut into pieces weighing
10 g each. Each piece was inoculated with 500 µl of a 108 CFU/ml
of L. monocytogenes. The inoculated samples were kept at 4℃ for
10 min for the attachment of pathogens. The inoculated samples
with L. monocytogenes were divided into five groups as control (not
essential oil), rosemary added, coriander added, basil added, and lau-
rel added. Then, 100 µl of essential oil (two times the concentration
of MIC) was added to the these fish fillets. Then the prepared fish
fillets were vacuum packaged and cooked at 50 and 55℃ for 7 min.
Pasteurized packets were quickly cooled to 0℃– 1℃ in an iced water
tank and stored at 4℃. The counts of L. monocytogenes was deter-
mined on days 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 22, 29, and 36 of the storage.
Determination of L. monocytogenes
Ten grams of fish were homogenized using 90 ml Maximum Recovery
Diluent. The homogenisation was diluted to 105 dilutions (with a
1/10 dilution rate). 0.1 ml of the appropriate dilutions were applied
into PALCAM Agar medium and incubation at 30℃ for 24– 48 hr. At
the end of the incubation colonies were counted and the number of
bacteria was determined as log CFU/g.
2.2.5 | Statisticalanalysis
The data obtained from the study were analyzed using ANOVA
(variance analysis). The results were evaluated by Tukey Multiple
Comparison Test. SPSS package programme was used to test
whether there was a difference between the experimental groups
(IBM SPSS 2012).
3 | RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 | Chemical composition of essential oils
The main components of the essential oils used in the study were
determined by GC-MS method. The percentages of the chemical
components of basil, coriander, rosemary, and laurel essential oils
are summarized in Table 1. As a result of this study, it was deter-
mined that the main components of rosemary essential oil (R. of-
ficinalis L) were eucalyptol (51.31%) and α-pinene(15.06%).Gouveia
et al. (2017) described the main compounds in rosemary essential
oil as eucalyptol (13.05%), camphor (8.93%), verbenone (8.58%),
endo-borneol (7.87%),anda-pinene (6.78%). Ghabraie et al. (2016)
reported that the major components of this essential oil were
1.8- cineole (44.48%), a- pinene (12.45%), and camphor (10.70%).
Teixeira et al. (2013) stated that rosemary essential oil is rich in cam-
phor, eucal yptol, and bor nylacetate. Gu tierrez et al. ( 2008) deter-
mined that the main components of this oil were eucalyptol (39.6%),
camphor (19%), a- pinene (4.8%). Jordán et al. (2013) found that the
main components of R. officinalis essential oils obtained from differ-
ent ecological bioclimatic fields were a- pinene, camphene, eucalyp-
tol, and camphor. In this study, the main components of rosemary
essential oil have been generally similar to other studies. However,
the percentage of eucalyptol compound was determined to be
higher than the other studies.
As a result of this study, it was determined that the main com-
ponents of Laurel (L. nobilis) were eucalyptol (62.84%) α- terpinenyl
acetate (6.32%), α- pinene (4.47%), terpinen- 4- ol (3.73%), β- pinene
(3.37%), and linalool (2.08%). Ramos et al. (2012) described the main
compounds in L. nobilis as eucalyptol (27.2%), α- terpinenyl acetate
17454549, 2021, 10, Downloaded from https://ifst.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpp.15878 by Izmir Katip Celebi University Kutuphane Ve Dokumantasyon, Wiley Online Library on [16/11/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
4 of 10
|
ÖZTÜRK e T al.
TABLE 1 Chemicalcomposition(%)ofbasil,coriander,laurel,androsemaryessentialoils,determinedbyGC-MS
Component name
Basil Coriander Rosemary Laurel
% % % %
Alpha- citral 0.32 – – –
Alpha- muurolene – – 0.04 0.13
Alpha- pinene 0.08 6.21 15.06 4.47
Alpha- copaene – – 0.13 –
Alpha- thujene – – – 0.36
Alpha- phellandrene – – 0.07 0.50
Alpha- terpineol – 0.38 – 0.50
Alpha- terpinyl acetate – – – 6.32
Beta- bisabolene 0.04 – 0.05 0.06
Beta- citral 0.57 – – –
Beta- myrcene 0.03 0.78 1.08 0.72
Beta- pinene 0.06 0.46 0.98 3.37
Beta- ocimene 0.10 – – 0.46
(+)- 2- bornanone – 5.74 4.49 –
Bornyl acetate – – 1.15 –
Camphene – 1.01 4.37 0.04
Camphene hydrate – – 0.86 –
3- carene – – 0.19 –
(+)- 3- carene – 0.03 0.16 –
(+)- 4- carene – – 0.13 0.74
Caryophyllene 0.36 – 3.89 0.29
Caryophyllene oxide – – 0.19 0.06
Cis- beta- farnesene 0.12 – – –
Cis- 2- p- menthen- 1- ol – – – 0.14
Decane 0.03 0.04 0.04 –
Delta- terpineol acetate – – – 0.27
D- limonene 0.08 2.74 2.68 –
Endo- borneol – 0.22 4.88 –
Estragole 75.56 – – –
Eucalyptol 0.32 0.05 51.33 62.84
Eugenol – – – 0.18
(E)- beta- farnesene 0.08 – – –
Fenchol – – 0.09 –
Gamma-elemene – – – 0.10
Gamma-muurolene – – 0.09 –
Gamma-terpinene – 4.01 0.03 1.35
Geraniol – 1.05 – –
Geranylacetate – 2.17 – –
Germacrene-D 0.18 – – 0.04
Ho- trienol – 0.18 – –
Humulene 1.60 – 0.58 0.58
Humulene 0.19 – – –
Linalool 18.97 70.09 0.35 2.08
Levo- menthol 0.32 – – –
(Continues)
17454549, 2021, 10, Downloaded from https://ifst.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpp.15878 by Izmir Katip Celebi University Kutuphane Ve Dokumantasyon, Wiley Online Library on [16/11/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
|
5 of 10
ÖZTÜRK e T al.
(10.2%), linalool (8.4%), methyleugenol (5.4%), sabinene (4.0%),
and car vacrol (3.2%). Similarly Ghabraie et al. (2016), found high
amounts of 1.8- cineole (48.1%), a- terpineol (6.8%), sabinene (6.4%),
a- pinene (6.3%), and b- pinene (5.8%) compounds in L. nobilis. Da
Silveira et al. (2014) stated that the main components of Laurel were
1.8- cineole (35.50%) and linalool (14.10%).
It was determined that the main components of coriander (C. sa-
tivum) were linalool (70.09%), α- pinene (6.21%) and (+)- 2- bornanone
(5.74%). Similar to our work; Khalil et al. (2018) and Delaquis
et al. (2002) reported that the main content of coriander essential
oil was linalool and α- pinene. Miri and Djenane (2018) described
the main compounds in coriander as linalool (78.86%). Unlike this
studies, Teixeira et al. (2013) stated that the main composition of
this essential oil was 3- carene and γ-terpinene.Gilletal.(2002)re-
ported that the main compound of this was linalool (% 25.86) and
(E)- 2- decenal (20.22%).
As a result of this study, it was determined that the main compo-
nents of basil (O. basilicum) estragole (methylchavicol) (75.56%) and
linalool (18.97%). Similarly, Teixeira et al. (2013) found that the main
componentofbasil essential oil was methylchavicoland Gutierrez
et al. (2008) determined that the main component of this essential
oillinalool(42.3%),estragole(26.9%)andeucalyptol(8.1%).Soković
et al. (2010) stated that the main composition of this essential oil was
linalool (69.3%).
The results of the research show that there are differences in
the main components and amounts of rosemary, basil, coriander
and laurel essential oils. These differences are thought to depend
on the geographic conditions of the plants, climate and harvest sea-
son. In addition, the use of different parts of plants and different
extraction applications may have caused these differences (Azeredo
et al., 2011; Gach kar et al., 20 07;Go uveia et al., 2017; Nezhad ali
et al., 2014; Teixeira et al., 2013).
3.2 | Antibacterial effect of essential oils
In this study, the disk diffusion method was used to determine an-
tibacterial activities of essential oils on L. monocytogenes. The anti-
bacterial activity of the essential oils against L. monocytogenes are
presented in Table 2. According to disc diffusion results, laurel, cori-
ander, and rosemary essential oils were found to be more effective
than basil oil (p < .05).
Mazzarrino et al. (2015) evaluated the activity level of antimi-
crobial agents according to the zone diameters determined by the
disk diffusion test. According to this evaluation, those inhibition
zone “<12 mm” were evaluated as having weak antimicrobial effect;
“>12.1 mm” were evaluated as having medium antimicrobial effect;
“>20 mm” were evaluated as having strong antimicrobial effect. In
the study conducted by us, it was determined that essential oils of
laurel (31.75 mm), rosemary (30.5 mm), and coriander (20.50 mm)
had strong antimicrobial effect; basil essential oil (14.25 mm) had
strong medium antimicrobial effect.
Ouibrahim et al. (2013) reported that the inhibition zones against
20 bacteria they tested were 8.4– 22.4 mm for laurel; 8.4– 16.4 mm
Component name
Basil Coriander Rosemary Laurel
% % % %
Mesitylene 0.03 – 0.04 –
Methyleugenol – – – 0.61
Myrtenyl acetate – 0.08 – –
3- octanone – – 0.07 –
P- cymene 0.03 3.62 3.80 2.70
Pinocarvone – – – 0.08
Prenylacetone 0.10 – – –
Sabinene – – – 5
Sabinene hydrate – – – 0.15
Α- Sabinene – 0.20 – –
Terpineol 0.12 3.10 1.60
Terpinen- 4- ol – 0.17 0.08 3.73
Terpinolene – – – 0.26
Α- Terpinolen – 0.73 – 0.5
Terpinene- 1- ol – – – 0.27
Trans- alpha- bergamotene 0.56 – – –
Trans- linalool oxide 0.06 – – –
Trans- 4- metoxycinnamaldehyde 0.03 – – –
Note: – , not detected.
TABLE 1 (Continued)
17454549, 2021, 10, Downloaded from https://ifst.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpp.15878 by Izmir Katip Celebi University Kutuphane Ve Dokumantasyon, Wiley Online Library on [16/11/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
6 of 10
|
ÖZTÜRK e T al.
for rosemary and 7– 19.9 mm for basil. Teixeira et al. (2013) stated
that the inhibition zone for rosemary, basil and coriander essential
oils against L. monocytogenes were 8, 9, and 16 mm, respectively.
Ghabraieetal.(2016)foundthattheinhibitionzoneagainstL. mono-
cytogenes was less than 10 mm for laurel essential oil; was 11.2 mm
for rosemary essential oil. Similarly, Tural and Turhan (2017) found
that the inhibition zone for rosemary essential oil was higher than
the laurel essential oil. Pesavento et al. (2015) reported that the inhi-
bition zone for rosemary essential oil was 16.3 mm against L. mono-
cytogenes. In addition, the researchers stated that Cinnamomum
zeylanicum (24 mm), Origanum vulgare (19.7), and Thymus vul-
garis (33.5) essential oils were more effective than rosemary oil.
Mazzarrino et al. (2015) stated that rosemary essential oil had a
low (<12 mm) and medium (>12.1 mm) antimicrobial effect against
L. monocytogenes. Jordán et al. (2013) reported that the inhibition
zone for different chemotypes of rosemary essential oil against L.
monocytogenes varied between 20.9 and 22.8 mm.
Cherrat et al. (2014) reported that the inhibition zone of laurel
essential oil against different strains of L. monocytogenes ranged
from 14.0– 32.5. Millezi et al. (2012) found that the inhibition zones
for laurel essential oil at different concentrations (5%– 50%) on
L. monocytogenes ranged between 1.0 and 5.67 mm.
Although the essential oils used in most of the studies were
identical, the antimicrobial effect on L. monocytogenes was differ-
ent. It has been reported that the antimicrobial effect of essential
oils changes depending on the type and amount of the components
contained in the essential oils, the extraction method, the inoculum
ratio and the growth phase of the bacteria (Burt, 2004; Tajkarimi
et al., 2010; Tosun et al., 2018).
3.3 | MIC and MBC of essential oils
MIC and MBC values of basil, coriander, laurel, and rosemary essen-
tial oils against L. monocytogenes are given in Table 3. As a result of
this study, MIC values fo r L. monocytogenes were 6.25 m g/ml for basil
and laurel essential oils; 12.50 mg/ml for essential oils of rosemary
and coriander essential oils. MIC is an effective method to compare
the antibacterial effect of essential oils and to determine the con-
centrationwithoutbacterialgrowth(Gouveiaetal.,2017).
Gouveia etal. (2017) found that the MIC forL. monocytogenes
was 62.5 µl/ml for rosemary essential oil. Azeredo et al. (2011) de-
termined the MIC value as 20 µl/ml. Another study was carried out
by De Medeiros Barbosa et al. (2016) and a MIC value of 5 µl/ml was
obtained. Jordán et al. (2013) concluded that the MIC of different
chemotypes of this essential oil for L. monocytogenes was smaller
than 0.5 µl/ml.
Da Silveira et al. (2014) reported that the MIC of laurel essen-
tial oil for two different strains of L. monocytogenes (L. monocyto-
genes ATCC 19117, L. monocytogenes serotype 2 ATCC 19112) was
1.25– 2.5 g/L. The results obtained by the researchers indicate
that the laurel essential oil is more effective on L. monocytogenes
than Salmonella typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Cherrat et al. (2014) found that the MIC of laurel essential oil
for different strains of L. monocytogenes was between 0.5– 1.0 µl/L.
Ramos et al. (2012) found that MIC value of this essential oil is
1.1mg/ml.Ghabraieetal.(2016)reportedthattheMICofL. mono-
cytogenes was 4,380 ppm for rosemary essential oil and was greater
than 10,000 ppm for laurel essential oil. Dussault et al. (2014) stated
that the MIC of L. monocytogenes was 2,500 ppm for laurel essential
oil and was greater than 5,000 ppm for coriander and rosemary es-
sential oils. Teixeira et al. (2 013) reported that the coriande r essential
oil for L. monocytogenes had the lowest MIC value, followed by rose-
mary and basil essential oils (MICCoriander < MICRosemary < MICBasil).
Oussalah et al. (2007) reported that the concentration of 0.8% (vol/
vol) of coriander essential oil was effective on L. monocytogenes.
As a result of the studies conducted by different researchers,
it was obser ved that the MIC values of essential oils differed from
each other. It is thought that this difference may be related to the
different strains of L. monocytogenes used, the composition of the
essential oils and different types of solvents in the oils (Djenane
etal., 2011;Gouveia et al., 2017). According todisc diffusionand
TABLE 2 Antibacterial activity of basil, coriander, laurel, and
rosemary essential oils against Listeria monocytogenes, using paper
disc- diffusion method, inhibition zones in mm
Essential oils
Inhibition zone
diameter (mm)
Coriander 20.5 ± 0.71c
Rosemary 30.5 ± 0.71a
Basil 14.5 ± 0.71d
Laurel 31.5 ± 2.12a
Ampicillin (AMP; 10 µg) 25.0 ± 0.0b
Erythromycin (E, 15 µg) 16.0 ± 0.0d
Sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SXT, 25 µg) 18.0 ± 0.0cd
Note: Different letters are significantly different from each other
(p < .05).
TABLE 3 Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC, mg/ml) and
minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC, mg/ml) of basil, coriander,
laurel, and rosemary essential oils against Listeria monocytogenes
Essential oils
Analysis of antibacterial
activitya L. monocytogenes
Coriander MIC (mg/ml) 12.50
MBC (mg/ml) 12.50→(0.403abs)
Rosemary MIC (mg/ml) 12.50
MBC (mg/ml) 12.50→(0.152abs)
Basil MIC (mg/ml) 6.250
MBC (mg/ml) 6.250→(0.045abs)
Laurel MIC (mg/ml) 6.250
MBC (mg/ml) 6.250→(0.015abs)
aMinimum inhibition concentration (MIC; mg/ml), Minimum bactericidal
concentration (MBC; mg/ml ve abs; absorbans).
17454549, 2021, 10, Downloaded from https://ifst.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpp.15878 by Izmir Katip Celebi University Kutuphane Ve Dokumantasyon, Wiley Online Library on [16/11/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
|
7 of 10
ÖZTÜRK e T al.
MIC results, it was found that the essential oil with the highest anti-
microbial effect on L. monocytogenes was laurel oil.
3.4 | Inactivation of L. monocytogenes in fish fillets
The change in the number of L. monocytogenes during storage period
in trout fillets added of basil, coriander, laurel, and rosemary essen-
tial oils and applied to sous- vide at 50℃ and 55℃ for 7 min was
given in Figure 1a,b. The number of L. monocytogenes in the group
applied to coriander essential oil and applied to sous- vide at 50℃’de
was found to be lower than the control group (p < .05). Although the
number of L. monocytogenes in the group added of coriander essen-
tial oil lower than other groups added of essential oils, this difference
was not statistically significant (p > .05).
In the trout fillets treated with sous- vide at 55℃, the number
of L. monocytogenes was found to be lower than the control group.
Especially, it was determined that the difference in the group added
of coriander essential oil was statistically significant (p < .05). After
sous- vide processing (0 day), the number of L. monocytogenes in
the group added of coriander essential oil was found to be 3.01 log
CFU/g lower than the control group. The difference between these
groups continued until the 9th day of storage (p < .05).
In this study, the combined effect of essential oil and tempera-
ture applications on the inactivation of L. monocytogenes in fish
fillets cooked with sous- vide technology was investigated. The num-
ber of L. monocytogenes was found to be lower in the groups which
were applied sous- vide at 50℃ and added with essential oil. The
number of L. monocytogenes was found to be lower than 1.06, 0.67,
0.57, and 0.17 log CFU/g in the group containing coriander, rose-
mary, basil, and laurel essential oil compared to the control group not
containing essential oil, respectively. At the beginning of storage, it
was observed that essential oils had a high antimicrobial effect and
lost their effectiveness in the later days of storage.
In groups that applied sous- vide at 55℃, the number of
L.monocytogenes detected was 5.09 log CFU/g in the control group
on day 0. This number was decreased 3.01, 1.53, 1.82, and 1.11 log
CFU/g with the addition of coriander, rosemary, basil, and laurel es-
sential oils, respectively.
As a result of this study carried out by us, it was determined that
the antibacterial effect of essential oils in sous- vide application per-
formed at 55℃ was higher than essential oils in sous- vide application
performed 50℃. It has been determined that higher temperature ap-
plication increases the effect of essential oils on L. monocytogenes
and a synergistic effect occurs. In addition, it was observed that
coriander essential oil had a higher antimicrobial effect than other
essential oils in both temperature applications.
Gouveia e t al. (2017) reporte d that the rosemar y essential oi l
added at 1.25% to the meat product they applied sous- vide showed
higher antilisterial activity on the number of L. monocytogenes than
the thyme essential oil. Karyotis et al. (2017) reported that the
D- value on the number of L. monocytogenes in marinated chicken
breast meat applied sous- vide was determined 54.81 min for 55℃
and 10.39 min for 60℃. Bolton et al. (2000) reported that the
D- value on the number of L. monocytogenes in the vacuum cooked in
the meat samples were determined between 0.15 and 36.1.
Jafari et al. (2017), investigated alone effect and combination
effect of rosemary extract and chitosan on L. monocytogenes inoc-
ulated Huso huso fillets. At the end of the study, it was determined
that the combined use of rosemary extract and chitosan showed the
most effective antimicrobial effect against L. monocytogenes. Raeisi
et al. (2016) found that the use of rosemary essential oil with dif-
ferent antimicrobials (C. zeylanicum and nisin) against L. monocyto-
genes in chicken meat samples is more effective than the use of this
oil alone. Oliveira et al. (2013) investigated the effect of essential
oils in edible gelatin packaging on L. monocytogenes in fresh meat
products. The researchers stated that the number of L. monocyto-
genes was lower 0.42, 1.21, and 0.70 log CFU/g in the gelatin with
the addition of rosemary essential oil compared to the control group
at the 1st, 48th, and 96th hours. Haskaraca et al. (2019) investigated
the effect of 0.5% and 1% grapefruit seed extract on L. monocyto-
genes in the sous- vide process at 57.5℃, 60℃, 62.5℃, and 65℃.
Researchers have determined that the sous- vide procedure applied
to 5 7. 5℃, 60℃, 62.5℃, and 65℃ requires a processing time of 140,
62.38, 14.45, and 6.84 min to reduce the number of L. monocyto-
genes to 4 log CFU/g. Tosun et al. (2018) investigated the effect of
essential oils on the development of L. monocytogenes in untreated
salmon fillets at +2℃. The researchers initially found the number of
FIGURE 1 Listeria monocytogenes (log CFU/g) changes in (a) 50℃ and (b) 55℃ for 7 min sous- vide applied trout fillets at +4℃
17454549, 2021, 10, Downloaded from https://ifst.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpp.15878 by Izmir Katip Celebi University Kutuphane Ve Dokumantasyon, Wiley Online Library on [16/11/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
8 of 10
|
ÖZTÜRK e T al.
L. monocytogenes at 4.75, 4.77, and 4.80 log CFU/g for rosemary, co-
riander and control groups and this number was to be 4.67, 4.73, and
4.95 log CFU/g at the end of the 96th hour, respectively. At the end
of the study, the researchers stated that the group that added es-
sential oil had a lower number of L. monocytogenes compared to the
control group. However, they reported that there was no statistically
significant difference between the groups with added essential oil.
In the studies reported, different results have been obtained re-
garding antibacterial effects of essential oils. It is possible to explain
these differences by different L. monocytogenes strains and different
content of the essential oils used in the experiments (Abdollahzadeh
etal.,2014;Gouveiaetal.,2017).
4 | CONCLUSION
In this study, while coriander, laurel, and rosemary essential oils were
found to be effective according to disc diffusion results, coriander
essential oil was found to be the most effective essential oil on
L. monocytogenes in sous- vide applied trout. Coriander essential oil
addition (2 times more than the MIC value) and 7 min sous- vide ap-
plication in 55℃ was effective for the inhibition of L. monocytogenes
in sous- vide applied trouts. According to our results, the sous- vide
packaging in association with coriander essential oil was confirmed
as a good application for the quality preservation of trout. This study
shows that, sous- vide technology was used as a functional cooking
method in seafood, which will ensure pathogen control by use of es-
sential oils, so these foods will be safely and ready- to- eat.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This study has been supported by İzmir Katip Çelebi University
Scientific Research Project Coordination (Project number:
2 0 1 6 - G A P - S U Ü F - 0 0 1 8 ) .
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Fatma Öztürk: Investigation. Hatice Gündüz: Investigation. Göknur
Sürengil: Investigation.
DATA AVAIL ABI LIT Y S TATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from
the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
ORCID
Fatma Öztürk https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4763-3801
Hatice Gündüz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9899-8635
Göknur Sürengil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-7856
REFERENCES
Abdollahzadeh,E.,Rezaeı,M.,&Hosseını,H.(2014).Antibacterialactiv-
ity of plant essential oils and extracts: The role of thyme essential
oil, nisin, and their combination to control Listeria monocytogenes in-
oculated in minced fish meat. Food Control, 35, 177– 183. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.foodc ont.2013.07.004
Alahakoon, A. U., Oey, I., Bremer, P., & Silcock, P. (2018). Optimisation
of sous- vide processing parameters for pulsed electric fields treated
beef briskets. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 11(11), 2055– 2066.
htt ps://doi.org/10.10 07/s1194 7- 018- 2155- 9
Alahakoon, A. U., Oey, I., Bremer, P., & Silcock, P. (2019). Quality and
safety considerations of incorporating post- PEF ageing into the
pulsed electric fields and sous- vide processing chain. Food and
Bioprocess Technology, 12(5), 852– 864. https://doi.org/10.10 07/
s1194 7- 019- 02254 - 6
Amoroso,L.,Rizzo,V.,&Muratore,G.(2019).Nutritionalvaluesofpotato
slices added with rosemary essential oil cooked in sous- vide bags.
International Journal of Gastronomy and Fo od Science, 15, 1– 5. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2018.11.007
Azere do, D. G. A., St amford, T. L. M ., Nunes, P. C., Ne to, N. J. G., De
Oliveira,M.E.G.,&DeSouza,E.L.(2011).Combinedapplicationof
essential oils from Origanum vulgare L. and Rosmarinus officinalis L. to
inhibit bacteria and autochthonous microflora associated with min-
imally processed vegetables. Food Research International, 44, 1541–
1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodr es.2011.04.012
Baldwin, D. E. (2012). Sous- vide cooking: A review. International Journal
of Gastronomy and Food Science, 1, 15– 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijg fs.2011.11.0 02
Baron, E. J., & Finegold, S. M. (1990). Bailey and Scott's Diagnostic
Microbiology (8th ed., pp. 286– 402). St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby Co.
Ben, E. P., & Huss, H. H. (1993). Heat resistance of Listeria monocyto-
genes in vacuum packaged pasteurized fish fillets. International
Journal of Food Microbiology, 20(2), 85– 95. https://doi.
org/10.1016/0168- 1605(93)90096 - Y
Bolton, D. J., McMahon, C. M., Doherty, A. M., Sheridan, J. J., McDowell,
D. A., Blair, I. S., & Harrington, D. (2000). Thermal inactivation of
Listeria monocytogenes and Yersinia enterocolitica in minced beef u nder
laboratory conditions and in sous- vide prepared minced and solid
beef cooked in a commercial retor t. Journal of Applied Microbiology,
88, 626– 632. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365- 2672.2000.01001.x
Burt, S. (2004). Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential
applications in foods. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 94,
223– 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoo dmicro.2004.03.022
Cetinkaya, S., Bilgin, S., Etan, O. O., & Bilgin, F. (2015). Vakum paketli
pişirme yöntemi (sous-vide) ve Gökkuşağı alabalığı (Oncorchynchus
mykiss Walbaum,1792)’nauygulanması. Eğirdir Su Ürünleri Fakültesi
Dergisi, 11(2), 35– 44. https://doi.org/10.22392/ egird ir.246337
Cherrat, L., Espina, L ., Bakkali, M., García-Gonzalo, D., Pagán, R., &
Laglaoui, A. (2014). Chemical composition and antioxidant proper-
ties of Laurus nobilis L. and Myrtus communis L. essential oils from
Morocco and evaluation of their antimicrobial activity acting alone
or in combined processes for food preservation. Journal of th e Science
of Food and Agriculture, 94, 1197– 1204. https://doi.org/10.1002/
jsfa.6397
Church, I. (1998). The sensory quality, microbiological safet y and shelf
lifeofpackagedfoods.InS.Ghazala(Ed.),Sous- vide and cook- chill pro-
cessing for the food industry (2, pp. 190– 205). An Aspen Publishers,
Inc. ISBN: 0- 7514- 0433- 0.
Cosansu, S., Mol, S., Alakavuk, D. U., & Ozturan, S. (2013). The effect of
lemon juice on shelf life of sous- vide packaged whiting (Merlangius
merlangus euxinus, Nordmann, 1840). Food and Bioprocess Technology,
6(1), 283– 289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1194 7- 011- 0572- 0
Da Silveira, S. M., Luciano, F. B., Fronza, N., Cunha, A., Jr, Scheuermann,
G.N.,&Vieira,C.R.W.(2014).Chemicalcompositionandantibacte-
rial activity of Laurus nobilis essential oil towards foodborne patho-
gens and its application in fresh Tuscan sausage stored at 7 °C. LW T-
Food Science and Technology, 59, 86– 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
lwt.2014.05.032
17454549, 2021, 10, Downloaded from https://ifst.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpp.15878 by Izmir Katip Celebi University Kutuphane Ve Dokumantasyon, Wiley Online Library on [16/11/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
|
9 of 10
ÖZTÜRK e T al.
De Medeiros Barbosa, I., da Costa Medeiros, J. A., de Oliveira, K. Á.
R.,Gomes-Neto,N.J.,Tavares,J. F.,Magnani, M., &deSouza, E.L.
(2016). Efficacy of the combined application of oregano and rose-
mary essential oils for the control of Escherichia coli, Listeria monocy-
togenes and Salmonella Enteritidis in leafy vegetables. Food Control,
59, 468– 477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodc ont.2015.06.017
Del a q u is,P. J.,S t a nich, K . ,Girar d , B.,& M azza,G . (2002) . A ntim i c robi a l ac-
tivity of individual and mixed fractions of dill, cilantro, coriander and
eucalyptus essential oils. International Journal of Food Microbiology,
74, 101– 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168 - 1605(01) 00734 - 6
Djenane , D., Yangüela , J., Montañés, L ., Djerbal, M., & Roncal és, P. (2011).
Antimicrobial activity of Pistacia lentiscus and Satureja montana es-
sential oils against Listeria monocytogenes CECT 935 using laborator y
media: Ef ficacy and s ynergistic p otential in mince d beef. Food Control,
22, 1046– 1053. https://doi.or g/10.1016/j.foodc ont.2010.12.015
Dussault, D., Vu, K. D., & Lacroix, M. (2014). In vitro evaluation of an-
timicrobial activities of various commercial essential oils, oleoresin
and pure compounds against food pathogens and application in
ham. Meat Science, 96 , 514– 520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meats
ci.2013.08.015
Gachkar,L.,Yadegarı,D.,Rezaeı,M.B.,Taghızadeh,M.,Astaneh,S.A.,&
Rasoolı,I.(2007).ChemicalandbiologicalcharacteristicsofCuminum
cyminum and Rosmarinus officinalis essential oils. Food Chemistry, 102,
898– 904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodc hem.2006.06.035
García-Díez,J.,Alheiro,J.,Pinto,A.L.,Soares,L.,Falco,V.,Fraqueza,M.
J., & Patarata, L. (2017). Influence of food characteristics and food
additivesontheantimicrobialeffectofGarlicandOreganoessential
oils. Foods, 6, 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods 6060044
Ghabraie, M., Vu, K . D., Tata, L., Salmieri, S., & Lacroix, M. (2016).
Antimicrobial effect of essential oils in combinations against five
bacteria and their effect on sensorial quality of ground meat. LW T-
Food Science and Technology, 66, 332– 339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
lwt.2015.10.055
Gill, A.O., Delaquis, P.,Russo, P.,&Holley, R.A. (2002). Evaluation of
antilisterial ac tion of cilantro oil on vacuum packed ham. International
Journal of Food Microbiology, 73, 83– 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0168 - 1605(01)0 0712 - 7
Gonzalez-Fandos, E., Garcia-Lınares, M. C., Villaniro-Rodriguez, A.,
Garcıa A rias, M. T., & Garcia-Fe rnandez, M. C . (2004). Evalu ation
of the microbiological safety and sensory quality of rainbow
trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) processed by the sous- vide method.
Food Microbiology, 21, 193– 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740
- 0020(03)00053 - 4
Gonzalez-Fandos, E., Garcia-Linares, M. C., Villaniro-Rodriguez, A.,
Garcia-Arias,M.T.,&Garcia-Fernandez,M.C.(2005).Microbiological
safety and sensory characteristics of salmon slices processed by the
sous- vide method. Food Control, 16, 77– 85. ht tps://doi.org /10.1016/j.
foodc ont.2003.11.011
Gouveia ,A.R.,Alves,M.,deAlmeida,J.M.,Monteiro-Silva,F.,González-
Aguilar,G.,Silva,J.A.,&Saraiva,C.(2017).Theantimicrobialeffect
of essential oils against Listeria monocytogenes in sous- vide cook- chill
beef during storage. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 41 ,
e13066. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13066
Gouveia,A.R.,Alves,M.,Silva,J.A.,&Saraiva,C.(2016).Theantimicro-
bial eff ect of Rosemar y and Thyme es sential oils ag ainst Listeria mono-
cytogenes in sous- vide cook- chill beef during storage. Procedia Food
Science, 7, 173– 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2016.10.001
Gutierrez, J., Barry-Ryan,C., &Bourke,P.(2008).Theantimicrobial ef-
ficacy of plant essential oil combinations and interactions with food
ingredients. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 124, 91– 97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoo dmicro.2008.02.028
Hansen, T. B., & Knochel, S. (2001). Factors influencing resuscitation and
growth of heat injured Listeria monocytogenes 13– 249 in sous- vide
cooked beef. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 63, 135– 147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168 - 1605(00)00467 - 0
Haskaraca, G., Juneja, V. K.,Mukhopadhyay, S.,& Kolsarici, N. (2019).
The effects of grapefruit seed extract on the thermal inactivation
of Listeria monocytogenesinsous-videprocesseddönerkebabs.Food
Control, 95, 71– 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodc ont.2018.07.006
Hu, H., Zheng, X., & Hu, H. (2012). Chemical composition, antimicro-
bial, antioxidant and cytotoxic activity of the essential oil from the
leaves of Acanthopanax leucorrhizus (Oliv.) Harms. Environmental
Toxicology and Pharmacology, 34, 618– 623. http s://doi. org/10.1016/j.
etap.2012.07.005
Ismail, I ., Hwang, Y. H., & Joo, S. T. (2019). Effec t of different temperature
and time co mbinations on qua lity characteristi cs of sous- vide cooked
goat Gluteus Medius and Biceps Femoris. Food and Bioprocess
Technology, 12(6), 1000– 1009. https://doi.org/10.10 07/s1194 7- 019-
02272 - 4
Jafari, A ., Jafarpour, A., & Safari, R. (2017). Influence of chitosan nano-
composite and rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) extract coat-
ing on quality of Huso huso fillet inoculated with Listeria mono-
cytogenes during refrigerated storage. Journal of Aquatic Food
Product Technology, 26, 675– 685. https://doi.org/10.1080/10498
850.2016.1266427
Jordán, M. J., Lax, V., Rota, M. C., Lorán, S., & Sotomayor, J. A. (2013).
Effect of bioclimatic area on the essential oil composition and anti-
bacterial activity of Rosmarinus officinalis L. Food Control, 30, 463–
468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodc ont.2012.07.029
Karyotis, D., Skandamis , P. N., & Juneja , V. K. (2017). Thermal inac tivation
of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. in sous- vide processed
marinated chicken breast. Food Research International, 100, 894– 898.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodr es.2017.07.078
Khalil, N., Ashour, M., Fikr y, S., Singab, A. N., & Salama, O. (2018).
Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential
oils of selected Apiaceous fruits. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical
Sciences, 4, 88– 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fjps.2017.10.004
Martínez-Hernández, G. B., Artés-Hernández, F., Colares-Souza, F.,
Gómez,P.A.,García-Gómez,P.,&Artés,F.(2013).Innovativecook-
ing techniques for improving the overall quality of a kailan- hybrid
broccoli. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 6(8), 2135– 2149. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s1194 7- 012- 0871- 0
Mazzar rino, G., Paparella, A ., Chaves-López, C ., Faberi, A., Sergi, M.,
Sigismondi, C., Compagnone, D., & Serio, A. (2015). Salmonella enter-
ica and Listeria monocytogenes inactivation dynamics after treatment
with selected essential oils. Food Control, 50, 794– 803. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.foodc ont.2014.10.029
Millezi,A.F.,Caixeta,D. S., Rossoni,D. F.,Cardoso, M. D.G.,& Piccoli,
R. H. (2012). In vitro antimicrobial properties of plant essential oils
Thymus vulgaris, Cymbopogon citratus and Laurus nobilis against five
important foodborne pathogens. Food Science and Technology, 32,
167– 172. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101 - 20612 01200 5000021
Miri, Y.B.,&Djenane, D. (2018). Evaluation ofprotective ımpactofal-
gerian Cuminum cyminum L. and Coriandrum sativum L. essential oils
on Aspergillus flavus growth and aflatoxin B production. Pakistan
Journal of Biological Sciences, 21, 67– 77. https://doi.org/10.3923/
pjbs.2018.67.77
Mol, S., Özturan, S., & Cosansu, S. (2012). Determination of the quality
and shelf life of sous- vide pack aged Bonito (Sarda s arda, Bloch, 1793)
stored at 4 and 12 °C. Journal of Food Quality, 35, 137– 143. https://
doi.or g/10.1111/j.1745- 4557.2011.0 0430.x
Muñoz, S., Achaerandio, I., Yang, Y., & Pujolà, M. (2017). Sous vide pro-
cessing as an alternative to common cooking treatments: impact on
the starch profile, color, and shear force of potato (Solanum tubero-
sum L.). Food and Bioprocess Technology, 10(4), 759– 769. https://doi.
or g/10.10 07/s1194 7- 016- 1857- 0
Nezhad ali, A., Nabavı , M., Rajabıan , M., Akbarpou r, M., Poural ı, P., &
Amını, F. (2014). Chem ical variation of l eaf essential oil at d iffer-
ent stages of plant growth and in vitro antibacterial activity of
Thymus vulgaris Lamiaceae, from Iran. Beni- Suef University Journal
17454549, 2021, 10, Downloaded from https://ifst.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpp.15878 by Izmir Katip Celebi University Kutuphane Ve Dokumantasyon, Wiley Online Library on [16/11/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
10 of 10
|
ÖZTÜRK e T al.
of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3, 87– 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
bjbas.2014.05.001
Nyatı, H . (2000). S urvival cha racteris tics and the ap plicabilit y of pre-
dictive mathematical modelling to Listeria monocytogenes growth in
sous- vide products. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 56(2–
3), 123– 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168 - 1605(99)00193 - 2
Oke, F., Aslim, B., Ozturk, S., & Altundag, S. (2009). Essential oil compo-
sition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Satureja cuneifolia
Ten . Food Chemistry, 112, 874– 879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodc
hem.2008.06.061
Oliveira, M. M. M., Brugnera, D. F., & Piccoli, R. H. (2013). Essential oils of
thyme and Rosemary in the control of Listeria monocytogenes in raw
beef. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 44(4), 1181– 1188. https://doi.
org/10.1590/S1517 - 83822 01300 0400022
Ouibrahim, A., Tlili- Ait- kaki, Y., Bennadja, S., Amrouni, S., Djahoudi, A.
G., & Djeb ar, M. R. (2013). Evaluation of antibacterial ac tivity of
Laurus nobilis L., Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Ocimum basilicum L.
from Northeast of Algeria. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 7,
4968– 4973. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2 012.2390
Oussalah, M., Caillet, S., Saucier, L., & Lacroix, M. (2007). Inhibitory ef-
fects of selec ted plant essential oils on the growth of four patho genic
bacteria: E. coli O157: H7, Salmonella typhimurium, Staphylococcus au-
reus and Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control, 18, 414– 420. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.foodc ont.2005.11.009
Pesavento,G.,Calonico,C.,Bilia,A.R.,Barnabei,M.,Calesini,F.,Addona,
R., Mencarelli, L., Carmagnini, L., Di Martino, M. C., & Nostro, A. L.
(2015). Antibacterial activity of Oregano, Rosmarinus and Thymus
essential oils against Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocy-
togenes in beef meatballs. Food Control, 54, 188– 199. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.foodc ont.2015.01.045
Raeisi, M., Tabaraei, A., Hashemi, M., & Behnampour, N. (2016). Effect
of sodium alginate coating incorporated with nisin, Cinnamomum
zeylanicum, and rosemary essential oils on microbial quality of
chicken meat and fate of Listeria monocytogenes during refrigeration.
International Journal of Food Microbiology, 238, 139– 145. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ijfoo dmicro.2016.08.042
Ramos, C ., Teixeira, B., Batista, I., Matos, O., Serrano, C., Neng, N. R.,
Nogueira, J. M., Nunes, M. L ., & Marques, A. (2012). Antioxidant and
antibacterial activity of essential oil and extracts of bay laurel Laurus
nobilis Linnaeus (Lauraceae) from Portugal. Natural Product Research,
26, 518– 529. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786 419.2010.531478
Rinald i, M., Dall’Asta , C., Meli, F., Morini, E ., Pellegrini, N ., Gatti, M.,
& Chiavaro, E. (2013). Physicochemical and microbiological qual-
ity of sous- vide- processed carrots and Brussels sprouts. Food and
Bioprocess Technology, 6(11), 3076– 3087. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s1194 7- 012- 0973 - 8
Rinaldi, M., Dall’Asta, C., Paciulli, M., Cirlini, M., Manzi, C ., & Chiavaro,
E. (2014). A novel time/temperature approach to sous- vide cooking
of beef muscle. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 7(10), 2969– 2977.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s1194 7- 014- 1268- z
Schellekens, M. (1996). New research issues in sous- vide cooking.
Trends in Food Science and Technology, 7, 256– 262. https://doi.
org/10.1016/0924- 224 4(96)10027 - 3
Soković,M., Glamočlija, J.,Marin,P.D.,Brkić, D.,& vanGriensven,L.J.
(2010). Antibacterial effects of the essential oils of commonly con-
sumed medicinal herbs using an in vitro model. Molecules, 15, 7532–
7546. https://doi.org/10.3390/molec ules1 5117532
Sun,S.,Rasmussen,F.D.,Cavender,G.A.,&Sullivan,G.A.(2019).Texture,
color and sensory evaluation of sous- vide cooked beef steaks pro-
cessed using high pressure processing as method of microbial con-
trol. LW T, 103, 169– 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.12.072
Tajkarimi, M. M., Ibrahim, S. A., & Cliver, D. O. (2010). Antimicrobial herb
and spice compounds in food. Food Control, 21, 1199– 1218. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.foodc ont.2010.02.003
Teixeira, B., Marques, A., Ramos, C., Neng, N. R., Nogueira, J. M., Saraiva,
J. A., & Nunes, M. L. (2013). Chemical composition and antibacte-
rial and antioxidant proper ties of commercial essential oils. Industrial
Crops and Products, 43, 587– 595. ht tps://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcr
op.2012.07.069
Tosun,Ş.Y.,Üçok Alakavuk, D., Ulusoy,Ş., & Erkan, N. (2018).Effects
of essential oils on the survival of Salmonella Enteritidis and Listeria
monocytogenes on fresh Atlantic salmons (Salmo salar) during stor-
age at 2±1 °C. Journal of Food Safety, 38, e12408. https://doi.
org /10.1111/jfs.12408
Tural, S., & Turhan, S. (2017). Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of
Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) and
Laurel (Lauris nobilis L.) essential oils and their mixtures. The Journal
of Food, 42,588–596.https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD17030
How to cite this article:Öztürk,F.,Gündüz,H.,&Sürengil,G.
(2021). The effects of essential oils on inactivation of Listeria
monocytogenes in rainbow trout cooked with sous- vide. Journal
of Food Processing and Preservation, 45, e15878. https://d oi.
org /10.1111/jfpp.15878
17454549, 2021, 10, Downloaded from https://ifst.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpp.15878 by Izmir Katip Celebi University Kutuphane Ve Dokumantasyon, Wiley Online Library on [16/11/2022]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License