ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

A new species, Polygala guilanica (Polygalaceae), is described from Kooh-Roubar, Gasht-Roodkhan protected area in W Guilan province, N Iran. The new species is distinguished based on its prostrate stem; small, lanceolate, ovate and rhombic, sessile leaves; tiny pink-white flowers in lax terminal racemes; 6 or 8 stamens with sessile anthers, a filiform style and brownish seed with 3-lobed caruncle. Detailed morphological description of the new species, photographs and distribution map are provided. Polygala guilanica is compared with the morphologically closest species: P. kurdica, P. hohenackeriana and P. anatolica. An updated identification key is provided for the Iranian species.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Phytotaxa 513 (2): 141–151
https://www.mapress.com/j/pt/
Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article PHYTOTAXA
ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition)
ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition)
Accepted by Enrico Vito Perrino: 24 Jul. 2021; published: 4 Aug. 2021
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.513.2.5
141
Polygala guilanica (Polygalaceae), a new species from Guilan Province, N Iran
ALI SARVI¹*, MARZIEH BEYGOM FAGHIR¹ & ROBABEH SHAHI SHAVVON²
¹ Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
alisarvi95@gmail.com; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8818-4067
Faghirmb@guilan.ac.ir; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3886-714X
² Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Yasouj University, Yasouj. Iran
R.shahi@yu.ac.ir; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-6197
*Author for correspondence
Abstract
A new species, Polygala guilanica (Polygalaceae), is described from Kooh-Roubar, Gasht-Roodkhan protected area in W
Guilan province, N Iran. The new species is distinguished based on its prostrate stem; small, lanceolate, ovate and rhombic,
sessile leaves; tiny pink-white flowers in lax terminal racemes; 6 or 8 stamens with sessile anthers, a filiform style and
brownish seed with 3-lobed caruncle. Detailed morphological description of the new species, photographs and distribution
map are provided. Polygala guilanica is compared with the morphologically closest species: P. kurdica, P. hohenackeriana
and P. anatolica. An updated identification key is provided for the Iranian species.
Keywords: endemic, Gasht-Roodkhan, identification key, morphology, taxonomy
Introduction
The genus Polygala Linnaeus (1753: 701) comprises ca. 400-700 species (Eriksen 1993, Persson 2001, Castro 2009,
Lyskov et al. 2019), traditionally considered as the most species-rich genus in the family Polygalaceae (Chodat
1891, 1893, Eriksen 1993, Paiva & De Cuba 1998: 346, Persson 2001, Pastore et al. 2019). Molecular evidence
(Persson 2001, Forest et al. 2007, Abbott 2011, Pastore et al. 2017, Mota et al. 2019) has revealed the polyphyly of
Polygala. This highly diverse morphological genus is well-known for its hermaphrodite and strongly zygomorphic
flowers, resembling the family Fabaceae flowers (Paiva & Santos Días 1989). The genus is characterized by its 8
(rarely 6) monadelphous stamens (in a single semi-circular ring) (Linnaeus 1753: 701, Shishkin 1964: 188, Eriksen
1993), two petaloid inner and three smaller outer sepals (Shishkin 1964: 188), a stipitate or sessile membranaceous
dehiscent capsule containing two small pubescent caruncular seeds (Chodat 1891, Eriksen 1993, Paiva & De Cuba
1998: 346, Uðurlu Aydin 2020). Polygala has a sub-cosmopolitan distribution, a marked pattern of regional endemism
and significant a representation in centers of diversifications as described by IUCN (Paiva 1998, Castro et al. 2008,
2010). They naturally grow in Eurasia (Cullen 1965, Dönmez et al. 2015) especially on steep slopes of mountainous
and highlands, as well as meadows with dry and calcareous soil (Shishkin 1964). China (with 44 species) (Jiang et
al. 2016), area covered by the former USSR (Shishkin 1964) (with 30 species) Italy (with 23 species) (Bartolucci
et al. 2018) and Turkey (with 16 species) (Cullen 1965, Peşmen 1980, Dönmez et al. 2015) are the most important
centers of diversity of this genus. Polygala consists of ca. 14 representatives in Flora Iranica (Chrtek & Krisa 1977)
and seven accepted species in the flora of Iran (Jalilian 2005) plus one recently introduced species, P. mazandaranica
Sarvi & Faghir (2020: 462) (Sarvi et al. 2020). Iranian species of Polygala are arranged in two subgenera, subgen.
Pseudosemeiocardium Adema (1966: 256) and subgen. Polygala, distributed in the Euro-Siberian (Hyrcanian), Irano-
Turanian and Saharo-Arabian phytogeographical regions, especially on rocky slopes of mountains and arid meadows
of N, NW, C and S Iran (Chrtek & Krisa 1977, Jalilian 2005). The main aim of the present paper is to describe a new
species of the genus Polygala for Iran, comparing it with its allied species and presenting an updated identification key
for the Iranian species of the genus, which currently includes 9 taxa.
SARVI ET AL.
142 Phytotaxa 513 (2) © 2021 Magnolia Press
FIGURE 1. Natural habitat of Polygala guilanica in Kooh-Roubar, Guilan province, N Iran. Photos by A. Sarvi.
Material and methods
During biosystematical study of the genus in 2019-2020, some dwarf and prostrate populations of Polygala, were found
on limestone and dry alpine meadows, in Kooh-Roubar (Fig. 1), in 1700 to 1800 m elev. in Gasht-Roodkhan protected
area near Masuleh, 60 km W Rasht (Center of Guilan province), N Iran (Fig. 2). The newly collected specimens were
deposited in Guilan (GUH) (Holotype) and Yasouj (Isotype) Universities Herbaria. The new species was identified
using different Floras and related articles (Boissier 1867: 76, Shishkin 1964: 118, Cullen 1965: 533, Chrtek & Krisa
1977, Peşmen 1980, Davis et al. 1988, Jalilian 2005, Eren et al. 2008, Raabe et al. 2009, Siebert et al. 2010, Dönmez
A NEW SPECIES OF POLYGALA GUILANICA Phytotaxa 513 (2) © 2021 Magnolia Press 143
et al. 2015, Wahlert et al. 2017, Dönmez & Uðurlu Aydin 2018, Sarvi et al. 2020). It was also compared with other
species of Polygala in central herbarium of Tehran University (TUH), herbarium of Shiraz University (HSHU), Iranian
research institute of plant protection (IRAN), herbarium of research institute of forests and rangelands (TARI) and
herbarium of animal & natural resources research center of Hormozgan province. The photographs of new species
(Fig. 3) were taken by Samsung Galaxy A20 mobile phone. For photography of different parts (Fig. 5), we used Dinox-
lite digital microscope, AM-413TMT model. The distribution map (Fig. 2) was presented by means of Google map
android software version 10.51.1 (Google LLC 2020).
FIGURE 2. Distribution map of Polygala guilanica (yellow sign) in Iran.
Results
Taxonomic treatment
Polygala guilanica Sarvi & Faghir, sp. nov. (Polygala L. subgen. Polygala) (Figs. 3–5).
Type:—IRAN. Guilan province, Masuleh, Gasht-Roodkhan protected area, Kooh-Roubar, limestones, dry stony mountain slopes, 1791 m,
37º14ʹ28″N, 48º95ʹ61″E, 3 July 2020, A. Sarvi 9001 (holotype GUH!; isotype: YUH!).
Diagnosis:—Polygala guilanica is similar to P. anatolica Boissier & Heldreich (1853: 57), but it differs by its prostrate and shorter stem,
smaller flowers, smaller leaves, lax inflorescence, ciliated outer sepals and 3-lobed caruncle; it also differs from P. kurdica Townsend
(1980: 184) by its anastomosing nerves of inner sepals, united filaments throughout their length, symmetrical capsule wings and its
stipitate capsule. Moreover, it differs from P. hohenackeriana Fischer & Meyer in Fischer et al. (1838: 42) by its corolla and inner
sepals color, outer sepals shape, inner sepals nerves pattern and seed shape.
Description:—Plant perennial, herbaceous, prostrate, root straight to oblique, thick and woody, branches arising at
the base, pubescent, densely leafy, 5–5.5 cm in height; leaves small, 10–13.75 × 3.5–4.6 mm, simple, alternate, sessile,
lanceolate, ovate, rhombic, covered with short curved trichomes, with acute to obtuse apices and strigose trichomes on
margin; racemes axillary and terminal, lax, 2–2.5 cm; bracts small and deciduous, 1–1.5 mm; outer sepal not gibbous,
ciliate, magenta and green-white, the two smaller 4.9–5.1 × 0.7–0.81 mm, obtuse apices, the longer one 5.2–5.35 ×
SARVI ET AL.
144 Phytotaxa 513 (2) © 2021 Magnolia Press
0.8–0.97 mm, magenta to red in color, ciliate at the apex and margins; inner sepals 9.3–10 × 4.2–5 mm, petaloid, elliptic,
acute sometimes obtuse, magenta to pink with bright anastomosing nerves; corolla 11.5–12 mm, pink to white, floral
appendages white to pale pink, fimbriate; stamens 8 or 6, filaments free and connate up to the middle forming an open
glabrous staminal sheath grouped into 1-lobed of 8 or 6 sessile anthers; style filiform, tapering above and below, 4–4.3
mm with an inconspicuous curvature at the base, stigma apical to subapical, with unequal lobes; capsules obcordate,
4–4.5 × 2.3–2.5 mm, with small depression at the apex, glabrous, stipitate, wings very narrow occurring only at upper
margins; seed elliptic, 2–2.3 × 0.85–0.95 mm, brownish, with simple hairs, 3-lobed white to creamy caruncles.
FIGURE 3. Polygala guilanica (from locus classicus: Kooh-Roubar 3 July 2020. A. Sarvi 9001) in natural habitat (Kooh-Roubar, Guilan
province, N Iran). Photos by A. Sarvi.
Etymology:—Polygala guilanica refers to Guilan province in N Iran.
Phenology:—Flowering in June–July and fruiting in July–August.
Distribution and ecology:—Hyrcanian region boasts substantial plant biodiversity. Considerable moisture
from N Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea to this region has caused a conspicuous area covered with
miscellaneous endemics (Akhani et al. 2010). Polygala guilanica is a tiny prostrate, semi-alpine Hyrcanian element
from the type locality in west of Guilan province, N Iran. Growing on limestone, dry stony mountain slopes and dry
meadows at 1700-1800 m elev.
Conservation status:—It is clearly prominent that, some Polygala species usually occupy small areas and
consequently, they are classified as endangered or rare species (Dönmez et al. 2015, Jiang et al. 2016, Dönmez &
Uðurlu Aydin 2018, Sarvi et al. 2020). In flora of Iran, P. irregularis Boissier (1846: 130), P. kurdica, P. monspeliaca
A NEW SPECIES OF POLYGALA GUILANICA Phytotaxa 513 (2) © 2021 Magnolia Press 145
Linnaeus (1753: 702) and P. mazandarnica represent four species with restricted growing areas (Chrtek & Krisa 1977,
Ghahraman & Attar 1999: 320, Jalilian 2005, Sarvi et al. 2020). Polygala guilanica also occupies restricted areas,
currently estimated less than 1000 m² and it probably should be considered as a rare and endangered species. In similar
cases, species are often considered as Endangered or Critically Endangered (e.g. Rebelo et al. 2011, Wagensommer et
al. 2014, 2017, Massó et al. 2018), but it is not mandatory, especially if there is no observed decline (e.g. Perrino et
al. 2018, Wagensommer et al. 2020). Therefore, the conservation status of Polygala guilanica should be evaluated in
future, after collecting more data in field, according to IUCN (2019) categories and criteria.
FIGURE 4. Polygala guilanica (from A. Sarvi 9001).
SARVI ET AL.
146 Phytotaxa 513 (2) © 2021 Magnolia Press
FIGURE 5. Polygala guilanica (from A. Sarvi 9001). A) leaves; B) short, curved and strigose trichomes at leaves margin; C) short, curved
and strigose trichomes on stem; D) lax raceme; E) sepals; F) corolla and wings; G) details of flower, arrow shows basal curvature of style;
H) six and eight sessile anthers in two different flowers; I) stipitate capsule; J) pistil; K) seeds; L) 3-lobed caruncle; M) anastomosing
nerves of inner sepal.
A NEW SPECIES OF POLYGALA GUILANICA Phytotaxa 513 (2) © 2021 Magnolia Press 147
TABLE 1. Comparison of Polygala guilanica with P. anatolica, P. hohenackeriana and P. kurdica.
Characters P. guilanica P. anatolica P. hohenackeriana P. kurdica
Height 5–5.5 cm 10–50 cm 2.5–12 cm 7–9 cm
Upper leaves shape Lanceolate, ovate, rhombic Linear-lanceolate Obovate-elliptic, lanceolate Elliptic, ovate, obovate
Upper Leaves length 10–13.75 mm 5–45 mm 3–20 mm 6–10 mm
Leaves width 3.5–4.6 mm 1–9 mm 2–5.5 mm 1.2–5.2 mm
Racemes Lax Loose Lax Lax
Racemes length 2–2.5 cm 1.5–21 cm 1–8 cm 2.5–4 cm
Flowers color Pink-white Magenta to white Pale bluish-lilac Purple
Corolla length Longer than inner sepals Longer than inner sepals Shorter than inner sepals Equaling or slightly longer than inner sepals
Outer sepals Not gibbous Not gibbous Gibbous Gibbous
Margin of outer sepals Ciliate Glabrous Glabrous to ciliate Ciliate
Inner sepal nerves Anastomosing Anastomosing Not Anastomosing Not Anastomosing
Inner sepals color Pink to magenta Magenta White to faint blue White-lilac
Stamens No. 6–8 8 8 8
Capsule wings Very narrow Narrow Narrow Broad
Capsule shape Obcordate Ovate or obcordate Obcordate Obovate
Capsule base Stipitate Abruptly stipitate Sessile Sessile
Seed’s caruncle lobes 3 2 3 3 (one is reduced)
SARVI ET AL.
148 Phytotaxa 513 (2) © 2021 Magnolia Press
Additional specimens examined:—Polygala anatolica: IRAN. Guilan, Rostam Abad, Salansar, Kalurz,
36°80’09”N, 50°63’61”E, 30 May 2019, A. Sarvi 8341 (GUH!); Mazandaran, Ramsar, Dalkhani jungle, Jannat
Roodbar road, 36°81’55”N, 50°64’51”E, 10 May 2019, A. Sarvi 8340 (GUH!). Polygla hohenackerina: IRAN.
Tehran, Chitgar, 18 April 1984, A. Ghareman 8136 (TUH!); IRAN. Qazvin, Avaj, Abe garm, Sagharan-e O’lya,
35°70’19”N, 49°33’11”E, 14 April 2019, A. Sarvi 8339 (GUH!). Polygala kurdica: IRAN. Kermanshah, Sarab-e
Kerand, 15 September 1989, Iranshahr & Dezfoolian 33222 (IRAN!).
Discussion
Polygala guilanica is a prostrate, dwarf and semi-orophyte species, growing 1700-1800 m elev.in N Iran (W Guilan
province). The new species is distinguished based on its small, lanceolate, ovate and rhombic, sessile leaves; tiny pink-
white flowers in lax terminal racemes; 6 or 8 stamens with sessile anthers, a filiform style and brownish seed with
3-lobed caruncle identify the new species.
Polygala guilanica may resemble to either of P. kurdica (usually producing prostrate and ascending stem) and P.
hohenackeriana (forming prostrate stem) mainly for its prostrate stem and a few other characters (e.g., its outer sepal
margin is identical to P. kurdica and its capsule shape is similar with P. hohenackeriana). However, the latter two
species display many morphological differences with the newly described species.
P. kurdica is characterized by its elliptic, ovate, obovate, obtuse upper leaves, short racemes, purple flowers,
non-anastomosing nerves of inner sepals, ciliated inner sepals, gibbous outer sepals, obovoid sessile capsules with
broad wings and 3-lobed seed which one is reduced to 0.2 mm (Jalilian 2005: 10) (Table 1). Whereas, obovate-
elliptic to lanceolate upper leaves, lax racemes pale blue to lilac flowers, white and faint blue inner sepals with nerves
not anastomosing, gibbous outer sepals 2-lobed stigma, a straight style, sessile capsule with narrow wings and 3-
lobed seed are important characters that identify P. hohenackeriana (Chrtek & Krisa 1977: 4, Shishkin 1964: 194).
In addition, Polygala guilanica does not have similar geographic distribution with P. kurdica and P. hohenackeriana.
The first species, naturally grows in W Iran, Kurdistan and Iraq (Townsend 1980: 184, Jalilian 2005: 10), while the
second one has a wider distribution range: from C to N and NW Iran, and Turkey, Caucasus, Balkans, Afghanistan
and Pakistan (Shishkin 1964: 194, Chrtek & Krisa 1977: 4, Jalilian 2005: 11). Polygala guilanica may show some
similarities in terms of its flower color and anastomosing nerves of inner sepals to P. anatolica, which occurs in Turkey,
N Iran and Caucasus (Shishkin 1964: 204, Chrtek & Krisa 1977: 7). Nevertheless, the latter species shows several
morphological dissimilarities regarding to its stem height and type (erect to ascending stem), leaves shape and size
(5–45 × 1–9 mm), racemes length (1.5–21 cm), inner sepals apex shape (obovoid to elliptic), glabrous outer sepals,
style length (6–7 mm) and number of stigma lobe (1-lobed stigma) and seed morphology (Cullen 1965: 536, Jalilian
2005: 11, Sarvi et al. 2020) (Table 1). According to previous studies (Shishkin 1964: 192 and Jalilian 2005: 11, Sarvi
et al. 2020), all Iranian Polygala species have 8 stamens. While, P. guilanica with its 8 to 6 stamens is an exception.
In this regard, it may resemble to three species, P. sibirica Linnaeus (1753: 702), P. tenuifolia Willdenow (1800: 879)
and P. japonica Houttuyn (1779: 89) of former USSR (Shishkin 1964). The three latter species do not overlap with
Polygala guilanica in terms of morphological features and phytogeographical distribution. P. sibirica, P. tenuifolia and
P. japonica have ascending erect stems, loose inflorescence and subglobular to obcordate capsule and their distribution
is mostly restricted to Japan, China, Mongolia, Himalia, Siberia and Central Europe (Shishkin 1964).
Identification key for Iranian species of Polygala
1 Capsule ciliated .................................................................................................................................................................P. erioptera
- Capsule glabrous ................................................................................................................................................................................2
2 Leaves petiolate, capsule globular, caruncle 2-lobed ......................................................................................................P. irregularis
- Leaves sessile or shortly petiolate, capsule obcordate or obovate, lobes of caruncle 3 or not clear ..................................................3
3 Stem prostrate .....................................................................................................................................................................................4
- Stem ascending-erect ..........................................................................................................................................................................6
4 Capsule symmetrically winged and stipitate .....................................................................................................................P. guilanica
- Capsule asymmetrically winged and sessile .......................................................................................................................................5
5 Upper leaves obtuse, corolla purple .....................................................................................................................................P. kurdica
- Upper leaves acute, corolla faint blue to lilac ........................................................................................................P. hohenackeriana
6 Annual, inner sepals pale green to white ......................................................................................................................P. monspeliaca
- Perennial, inner sepals pink or purple or magenta .............................................................................................................................7
7 Inner sepal veins not anastomosing, stigma 2-lobed ............................................................................................... P. mazandaranica
A NEW SPECIES OF POLYGALA GUILANICA Phytotaxa 513 (2) © 2021 Magnolia Press 149
- Inner sepal veins anastomosing, stigma 1-lobed ................................................................................................................................8
8 Inner sepals pink to magenta, filaments united near apex, stigma subapical, capsule stipitate ........................................P. anatolica
- Inner sepals purple, filaments joint lengthwise, stigma sub-central, capsule sessile ......................................................P. platyptera
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mr. Arash Talebkhani for his valuable guidance in collecting samples from Kooh-Roubar. We are
also thankful to Ms. S. S. Tamjidi Eramsadati at Guilan University Herbarium (GUH) for her cooperation.
References
Akhani, H., Djamali, M., Ghorbanalizadeh, A. & Ramezani, E. (2010) Plant biodiversity of Hyrcanian relict forests, N Iran: an overview
of the flora, vegetation, palaeoecology and conservation. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42 (1): 231–258.
Bartolucci, F., Peruzzi, L., Galasso, G., Albano, A., Alessandrini, A., Ardenghi, N.M.G., Astuti, G., Bacchetta, G., Ballelli, S., Banfi, E.,
Barberis, G., Bernardo, L., Bouvet, D., Bovio, M., Cecchi, L., Di Pietro, R., Domina, G., Fascetti, S., Fenu, G., Festi, F., Foggi, B.,
Gallo, L., Gottschlich, G., Gubellini, L., Iamonico, D., Iberite, M., Jiménez-Mejías, P., Lattanzi, E., Marchetti, D., Martinetto, E.,
Masin, R.R., Medagli, P., Passalacqua, N.G., Peccenini, S., Pennesi, R., Pierini, B., Poldini, L., Prosser, F., Raimondo, F.M., Roma-
Marzio, F., Rosati, L., Santangelo, A., Scoppola, A., Scortegagna, S., Selvaggi, A., Selvi, F., Soldano, A., Stinca, A., Wagensommer,
R.P., Wilhalm, T. & Conti, F. (2018) An updated checklist of the vascular flora native to Italy. Plant Biosystems 152 (2): 179–303.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2017.1419996
Boissier, E. (1846) Diagnoses Plantarum Orientalium Novarum, ser. 1, 1 (7). B. Herrmann, Lipsiae, 130 pp.
Boissier, E. (1867) Flora Orientalis, sive Enumeratio plantarum in Oriente a Graecia et Aegypto and Indiae fines hucusque observatarum.
Auctore Edmond Boissier, pp. 74–76.
https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.20323
Boissier, E. & Heldreich, T. (1853) Diagnoses Plantarum Orientalium novarum ser. 2, 1. Apud B. Herrmann, Lipsiae, 57 pp.
Castro, S., Silva, S., Stanescu, I., Silveira, P., Navarro, L. & Santos, C. (2009) Pistil anatomy and pollen tube development in Polygala
vayredae Costa (Polygalaceae). Plant Biology 11: 405–416.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00126.x
Chodat, R. (1891) Monographia Polygalacearum. Premiere partie. Mémoires de la Société de Physique et d’Histoire Naturelle de Genève
7: pp. 1–143.
Chodat, R. (1893) Monographia polygalacearum Vol. 31. Impr. Aubert-Schuchardt.
Chrtek, J. & Krisa, B. (1977) Flora Iranica, Family Polygalaceae, No. 124. Graz: Akademische Druckund, pp. 1–11.
Cullen, J. (1965) Polygala L. In: Davis, P.H. (Ed.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 1. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh,
pp. 533–539.
Davis, P.H., Mill, R.R. & Tan, K. (1988) Polygala L. In: Davis, P.H., Mill, R.R. & Tan, K. (Eds.) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean
Islands 10. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 64–65.
Dönmez, A.A. & Uðurlu Aydin, Z. (2018) Polygala azizsancarii (Polygalaceae), a new species from Mardin Province, SE Turkey.
Phytotaxa 340: 255–262.
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.340.3.5
Dönmez, A.A., Uðurlu Aydin, Z. & Iþýk, S. (2015) Polygala turcica (Polygalaceae), a new species from E Turkey, and a new identification
key to Turkish Polygala. Willdenowia 45 (3): 429–434.
https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.45.45309
Eren, Ö., Parolly, G., Raus, T. & Kürschner, H. (2008) A new species of Polygala L. (Polygalaceae) from south-west Anatolia. Botanical
Journal of Linnean Society 158: 82–86.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2008.00842.x
Eriksen, B. (1993) Phylogeny of the Polygalaceae and its taxonomic implications. Plant Systematics and Evolution 186: 33–55.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937712
Fischer, F.E.L., Meyer, C.A. & Trautvettler, E.R. (1838) Index quartum seminum, quae Hortus Botanicus Imperialis Petropolitanus
promutua commutatione offert. Accedunt animadversiones botanicae nonnullae. St. Petersburg, 42 pp.
Gharaman, A. & Attar, F. (1993) Biodiversity of Iranian plant species. Tehran University press, Iran, 320 pp. [In Persian]
Houttuyn, M. (1779) Handleiding tot de plant - en kuridkunde. L. van Es, Amsterdam [Nederlands] 10: 89 pp. [In Dutch]
SARVI ET AL.
150 Phytotaxa 513 (2) © 2021 Magnolia Press
IUCN (2019) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions
Committee, Cambridge U.K. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/redlistguidelines (accessed 18 June 2021)
Jalilian, N. (2005) Flora of Iran, No. 49: Polygalaceae. Agriculture Institute of forests and rangelands press. [In Persian]
Jiang, H., Liu, T., Li, L., Zhao, Y., Pei, L. & Zhao, J. (2016) Predicting the potential distribution of Polygala tenuifolia Willd. under climate
change in China. PLoS One 11 (9): e0163718.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163718
Linnaeus, C. (1753) Species plantarum. L. Salvii, Holmiae [Stockholm], pp. 701–704.
Lyskov, D., Pastore, J.F. & Samigullin, T. (2019) One for all: molecular study of Polygala major complex (Polygalaceae) in Southwest
Asia. Plant Systematics and Evolution 305 (10): 975–984.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-019-01618-x
Massó, S., López-Pujol, J. & Vilatersana, R. (2018) Reinterpretation of an endangered taxon based on integrative taxonomy: The case
of Cynara baetica (Compositae). PLoS ONE 13 (11): e0207094.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207094
Paiva, J.A.R. & De Cuba, A.D.C. (1998) Polygalarum africanarum et madagascariensium prodromus atque gerontogaei generis’
Heterosamara’Kuntze, a genere’Polygala’L. segregati et a nobis denuo recepti, synopsis monographica. Cyanus 1: 346.
Paiva, J.A. & Dias, J.D.S. (1989) The pollen grain of Polygala fruticosa Berg. (Polygalaceae). Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 47
(2): 377–385.
Pastore, J.F.B., Abbott, J.R., Neubig, K.M., Whitten, W.M., Mascarenhas, R.B., Mota, M.C.A. & Van den Berg, C. (2017) A molecular
phylogeny and taxonomic notes in Caamembeca (Polygalaceae). Systematic botany 42: 54–62.
https://doi.org/10.1600/036364417X694935
Pastore, J.F.B., Abbott, J.R., Neubig, K.M., Van Den Berg, C., Mota, M.C.D.A., Cabral, A. & Whitten, W.M. (2019) Phylogeny and
biogeography of Polygala (Polygalaceae). Taxon 68 (4): 673–691.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12119
Perrino, E.V., Silletti, G.N., Erben, M. & Wagensommer, R.P. (2018) Viola cassinensis subsp. lucana (Violaceae), a new subspecies from
the Lucanian Apennine, southern Italy. Phyton (Horn, Austria) 58 (2): 109–115.
https://doi.org/10.12905/0380.phyton58(2)-2018-0109
Persson, C. (2001) Phylogenetic relationship in Polygalaceae based on plastid DNA sequences from the trnL-F region. Taxon 50: 763–
779.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1223706
Peşmen, H. (1980) Six new species from Anatolia. Notes Royal Botanical Garden of Edinburgh 38: 435–441.
Raabe, U., Tan, K., Iatroú, G., Vold, G. & Parolly, G. (2009) Polygala rausiana (Polygalaceae), a new species from the northern
Peloponnese, Greece. Willdenowia 39: 69–75.
https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.39.39107
Rebelo, T.G., Freitag, S., Cheney, C. & McGeoch, M.A. (2011) Prioritising species of special concern for monitoring in Table Mountain
National Park: The challenge of a species-rich, threatened ecosystem. Koedoe 53 (2): 1019.
https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v53i2.1019
Sarvi, A., Beygom Faghir, M. & Shahi Shavoon, R. (2020) Polygala mazandaranica (Polygalaceae), a new species from Mazandaran
province, North Iran. Phytologia Balcanica 26 (3): 461–469.
Shishkin, B.K. (1964) Flora of the U.S.S.R. series initiated by Komarov 1: pp. 188–204.
Siebert, S.J., Retief, E., Van Wyk, A.E. & Struwig, M. (2010) A new species of Polygala (Polygalaceae) from ultramafic soils in
Sekhukhuneland, South Africa, with notes on its ecology. South African Journal of Botany 76 (2): 345–353.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2010.01.003
Townsend, C.C. (1969) Contributions to the flora of Iraq. IX. a new species of Polygala from Kurdistan. Kew Royal Botanical Garden
Kew Bull 23: pp. 531.
https://doi.org/10.2307/4117208
Townsend, C.C. (1980) Polygala. In: Townsend, C.C. & Evan, G. (Eds.) Flora of Iraq, 4. Ministry of Agriculture, Baghdad, pp. 182–
185.
Uðurlu Aydin, Z. (2020) Comparative capsule and seed morphology of Polygala L. (Polygalaceae) species in Turkey with implications for
taxonomy. Plant Biosystems 154 (2): 189–196.
https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2019.1588177
Wagensommer, R.P., Bartolucci, F., Fiorentino, M., Licht, W., Peccenini, S., Perrino, E.V. & Venanzoni, R. (2017) First record for the flora
of Italy and lectotypification of the name Linum elegans (Linaceae). Phytotaxa 296 (2): 161–170.
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.296.2.5.
Wagensommer, R.P., Medagli, P., Turco, A. & Perrino, E.V. (2020) IUCN Red List evaluation of the Orchidaceae endemic to Apulia (Italy)
A NEW SPECIES OF POLYGALA GUILANICA Phytotaxa 513 (2) © 2021 Magnolia Press 151
and conservations on the application of the IUCN protocol to rare species. Nature Conservation Research 5 (suppl. 1): 90–101.
https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2020.033
Wagensommer, R.P., Perrino, E.V. & Silletti, G.N. (2014) Carex phyllostachys C.A. Mey. (Cyperaceae) new for Italy and phytogeographical
considerations. Phyton (Horn, Austria) 54 (2): 215–222.
https://doi.org/10.12905/0380.phyton54(2)2014-0215
Wahlert, G.A., Schatz, G.E. & Phillipson, P.B. (2017) Two new species of Polygala from Toliara province in southern Madagascar. Systematic
Botany 42 (3): 522–528.
https://doi.org/10.1600/036364417X696096
Willdenow, K.L. (Ed.) (1800) Species plantarum exhibentes plantas rite cognitas ad genera relatas cum differentiis specificis, nominibus
trivialibus... secundum systema sexuale digestas. ed. 4. Nauck. 3 (2). 879 pp.
Article
Full-text available
Polygala idukkiana (Polygalaceae) is described as a new species from the Idukki district of Kerala in the southern Western Ghats. Detailed description along with colour photographs, distribution map, and key to the identification of Polygala species occurring in Kerala are provided. The new species is compared with the morphologically allied P. sibirica, P. rosmarinifolia, and P. chinensis. The conservation status of the new species is assessed provisionally as Data Deficient (DD) according to IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria.
Article
Full-text available
Polygala mazandaranica is a new species collected from the Mirzakoochak forest in Amol, Mazandaran Province, North Iran. Non-anastomotic nerves of inner sepals, two-lobed stigma, subsessile capsule and three-lobed caruncle of the seed identify the newly collected species. It is similar to P. anatolica and P. platyptera but differs by its habitat and some macro and micro morphological characters. A detailed morphological description of the new species, photographs and a comparison of the diagnostic characters with those of two other Hyrcanian species are provided. Furthermore, style and stigma are highlighted micromorphologically. An identification key for the Iranian taxa is presented.
Article
Full-text available
The conservation status of the ten taxonomically currently recognised orchid species and subspecies (eight in the ge-nus Ophrys, and one each in the genera Epipactis and Serapias) endemic to Apulia (southeast Italy) is presented. Each taxon has been assessed against the internationally accepted IUCN criteria and categories. Of the ten taxa, eight ones are classified as threatened (Endangered or Vulnerable), one as Near Threatened and one as Least Concern. Given that nine of the ten analysed taxa were recently assessed, a comparison with the previous assessments is presented: 67% of the assessed taxa changed their IUCN category. Four taxa (Ophrys murgiana, O. oxyrrhynchos subsp. ingrassiae, O. peucetiae, O. tardans) are now assigned to a higher threat category, while two taxa (Ophrys gravinensis and O. oestrifera subsp. montis-gargani) are now assigned to a lower threat category. These category changes in such a very short time are due to the better knowledge on the number of mature individuals and on the threats affecting the species, and to the discovery of new occurring sites. The most important category change affects Ophrys tardans. The new assessment leads to the category Endangered, whereas in the previous assessment this species was indicated as Least Concern, i.e. as not threatened. Another species with a noteworthy category increase is Ophrys peucetiae, previously indicated as Least Concern and now assigned to the category Vulnerable. The authors discuss these results, highlighting that especially when assessing rare species with a small distribution range against the IUCN protocol, it should be taken into account that the assessment could be influenced (also noteworthy) by the effective knowledge on the distribution, on the population size and on the threats affecting the populations. As a consequence, field work is warmly suggested before assessing the threat category of rare taxa, given that an increased effort in field research often leads to the discovery of new sites and to a better estimation of the number of individuals and of the threats.
Article
Full-text available
We estimated phylogenetic relationships of Polygala inferred from nrITS, matK‐trnK, trnL intron, trnL‐trnF intergenic spacer, and rbcL sequence data, with emphasis on the New World clade. Our results did not support the New World and Old World clades as sister groups in Polygala. Relationships among Polygala and allied genera are being discussed, with the recovered clades compared to those of the current taxonomic delimitations. A biogeographic analysis using an ultrametric phylogenetic tree and calibrated with the fossil Paleosecuridaca as well as a reconstruction of the ancestral area are also provided.
Article
Full-text available
Ten species of Polygala closely related to P. major are recorded in Southwest Asia. Most of them were described as local endemics of the Transcaucasia. However, species of the P. major complex are often difficult to identify, having rather subtle and changeable morphological features that could not be treated as essential. The phylogenetic analysis of sequences of the nrITS/ETS and chloroplast trnL–trnF regions (intron and spacer) showed their extreme similarity. Based on the molecular evidence and main diagnostic morphological features, the ten species of the P. major complex are synonymized under P. major. Typifications of eight combinations in Polygala from Western Asia and Europe are also clarified.
Article
Full-text available
In this study, capsule and seed features were compared to determine diagnostic traits useful for differentiating taxonomy among 14 Polygala species native to Turkey. Capsule and seed morphology of the genus was examined using light and scanning electron microscopy. Principal component analysis, ANOVA, and Tukey tests were used to facilitate the elucidation of relationship between Polygala taxa based on quantitative characters. Capsule length, wing width, and elaiosome shape are taxonomically important morphological features differentiating species. Moreover, wing symmetry is sufficient to separate two groups in through examination of capsules. As per the results, the recently described the species, P. turcica, as morphologically distinct from other Polygala species. The elaiosome shape was most distinct in P. monspeliaca and P. vulgaris. Based on micromorphology, P. supina can be differentiated from other species by distinctive surface ornamentation. In contrast, seed shape and color are of low taxonomic value for distinguishing taxa studied herein. An identification key for the studied taxa is provided. ARTICLE HISTORY
Article
Full-text available
The Strait of Gibraltar, the gateway between the Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea, has a convulsive geological history, with recurring closing and opening events since the late Miocene. As a consequence, this region has played a major role in the evolutionary history of many species. Cynara baetica (Compositae) is a diploid perennial herb distributed in both sides of this strait. It is currently subdivided into two subspecies: C. baetica subsp. baetica for the Spanish populations, and C. baetica subsp. maroccana for the Moroccan ones. Following three different approximations of species delimitation, including phylogenetic and population genetic analyses (based on three AFLP primer combinations and two intergenic spacers of cpDNA), ecological niche modeling (ENM) and morphological studies, this taxon is investigated and reinterpreted. The results obtained showed a clear genetic, morphological and ecological differentiation between the two taxa and the important role played by the Strait of Gibraltar as a geographical barrier. Based on this evidence, the current taxonomic treatment is modified (both taxa should recover their specific rank) and specific conservation guidelines are proposed for the newly delimited taxa.
Article
Full-text available
Polygala azizsancarii Dönmez (Polygalaceae) is herein described and illustrated as a new species from Mardin province in SE Turkey. This new species is similar to P. kurdica and P. supina, but it clearly differs by several morphological characters. Diagnostic characters of this new species are discussed with respect to taxonomy and illustrations. Conservation status of the new species is also assessed according to field observations. An updated identification key is presented for the Turkish species of the genus, which currently includes 18 taxa.
Article
Full-text available
An updated inventory of the native vascular flora of Italy, providing details on the occurrence at regional level, is presented. The checklist includes 8195 taxa (6417 species and 1778 subspecies), distributed in 1092 genera and 152 families; 23 taxa are lycophytes, 108 ferns and fern allies, 30 gymnosperms and 8034 angiosperms. The taxa currently occurring in Italy are 7483, while 568 taxa have not been confirmed in recent times, 99 are doubtfully occurring in the country and 19 are data deficient. Out of the 568 not confirmed taxa, 26 are considered extinct or possibly extinct.
Article
Full-text available
The genus Polygala (Polygalaceae) contains ca. 600 species that are distributed worldwide. A recent taxonomic evaluation of Polygala in Madagascar recognized 19 species in the island, as well as two new species from Toliara Province. The first new species from the area around Saint Augustin, Polygala labatii, is only known from two collections and belongs to the endemic P. sect. Madecassa. The second new species, Polygala mandrarensis, is distributed in the region of the Mandrare River basin and belongs to P. sect. Tetrasepalae. In this work, we describe and illustrate these two new species of Polygala. We also provide a key to the infrageneric taxa of Polygala in Madagascar, as well as keys to P. sect. Madecassa and the Malagasy species of P. sect. Tetrasepalae, and present a distribution map and make preliminary conservation assessments using IUCN Red List categories and criteria.
Article
Viola cassinensis subsp. lucana subsp. nova (Violaceae) is described and illustrated from Basilicata (southern Italy). Morphology, habitat and ecology are reported. This new taxon belonging to the Viola calcarata group is endemic to the Lucanian Apennine (southern Italy). It is compared with the similar taxa V. cassinensis subsp. cassinensis and V. cassinensis subsp. pseudogracilis.