Content uploaded by Barbara Waringer
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Barbara Waringer on Aug 02, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Conference Volume
6th Symposium
for Research in Protected Areas
2 to 3 November 2017, Salzburg
pages 707 - 709
707
Population density and habitat preferences
of the Collared Flycatcher
(Ficedula albicollis Temminck, 1815) in
floodplain forests – A case study from
the Donau-Auen National Park, Lower Austria
Ba rb ar a M. Waringer, Karl Reiter, Christian H. Sc hulze
Abstract
The Collared Flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis) is one of a few insectivorous long distance migrants with a slightly
positive population trend. In spring 2015 we examined habitat preferences of a population in the Donau-Auen
National Park. Singing males were counted at randomly chosen points in six survey rounds. Additionally, possible
breeding competitors and/or cavity providers, woodpecker holes, standing dead wood, flying insects, vegetation
parameters (forest surface roughness, forest type, forest age) and landscape variables (distance to water bodies
and open land) were recorded. A model selection approach was used to identify important factors for territory
presence. 57% of the points contained territories resulting in a population density of 7.28 territories/10 ha in the
sampling area. The Distance Sampling -Method estimated similar or even higher densities. Forest surface
roughness was the best predictor for territories; also, presence of Great Spotted Woodpecker, cavity availability
and dead wood stems had an impact. Territories with higher surface roughness showed a tendency to early
establishment. As forestry measures were stopped just 20 years ago and canopy roughness increases with stand
age, the habitat quality of the remaining Danube floodplain forests east of Vienna for Collared Flycatchers will
likely remain similar or even increase in the mid to long term.
Keywords
cavity breeder, forest structure, playback, territory establishment, canopy surface roughness, deadwood
Introduction
In terms of disturbance, edge-richness and productivity, floodplain forests offer diverse opportunities for birds
(BRAWN et al. 2001; Iwata et al. 2003) and are important habitats for woodpeckers and secondary cave-breeders
(REMM et al. 2006) like the Collared Flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis, Temminck 1815, Muscicapidae). This small,
insectivorous, long-distance migrating, facultatively polygynous passerine has a mainly Eastern European
distribution (BAUER et al. 2012; BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL 2004). It returns from its wintering grounds in tropical
Africa earliest by end of March; most of the individuals arrive at their breeding areas by mid-April up to May and
leave earliest by June. Cavities are occupied and defended by the earlier-arriving males and are shown to the later
arriving females. The conservation status is NT on the Austrian red list of endangered species; on the EU’s Birds
Directive, the species is listed on Appendix 1, Spec E (BAUER et al. 2012; SACHSLEHNER 1995; LUNDBERG & ALATALO
1992; LÖHRL 1951). Natural-cavity breeding populations are regarded to be threatened on a long-term scale due to
land use (e.g. SACHSLEHNER 1995).
This study was conducted in the the Donau-Auen National Park southeast of Vienna. It covers one of the last free-
flowing sections of the Danube river and its surrounding floodplain forests hold a substantial proportion of
Austria’s Collared Flycatcher population. We addressed the following questions, assuming that in high quality
habitats territories will be established earlier than in less suitable habitats: (1) In what order are the territories
established? (2) What are the most important features of a high-quality habitat? (3) Is there a relationship
between early territory establishment and habitat variables such as distance to water and insect density?
Methods
From April 3-May 24, 2015 multiple 5 min counts were done at 147 randomly chosen points. Each point was
visited six times to document the order of territory occupation by Collared Flycatchers. Tits, European Nuthatches
and woodpeckers were additionally counted to consider their potential role as breeding competitors and/or cavity
suppliers.
At the points, we measured standing dead wood, counted woodpecker holes and estimated the density of flying
insects. Forest type (soft wood vs. hard wood forest) and forest age were obtained from data provided by
Österreichische Bundesforste AG and the governmental unit MA 49 of the province Vienna. Distance to water
bodies and to open land was calculated using ArcGis 10.2. Forest surface roughness (standard deviation of mean
vegetation height in a radius of 50 m) was obtained from data from a LiDAR surveying flight (available for 111
points). We used a model selection to detect important factors for territory establishment (generalized linear
models with territory incidence as response variable).
708
Results
Collared Flycatchers are very abundant in the survey area and could be observed at least once at the majority
(87.8 %) of points. The first individual was observed on April 4, the main arrival started in mid-April. At 57 % of
our census points, we found a total of 84 territories within a 50 m radius resulting in a population density of 7.28
territories per 10 ha. Estimates based on the Distance-Sampling method (e.g. LLOYD et al. 1998) support even
higher densities. Forest surface roughness was the best predictor for the occurrence of territories (Fig. 1); a higher
surface roughness increased the probability for territories. Other important factors were the presence of Great
Spotted Woodpeckers (negative effect), cavity availability (positive effect) and standing dead wood (negative
effect).
Figure 1: Model averaged importance of terms for predicting the occurrence of Collared Flycatcher territories.
There was a tendency of earlier territory establishment at points with higher surface roughness compared to those
with a more homogenous tree layer (Fig. 2).
Figure 2: Mean surface roughness at territories with different establishment-time.
Discussion
The observed density of 7.28 territories per 10 ha in the riverine forests southeast of Vienna is surely exceeding
the Central European average. Since the 1980ies, the population seems to be stable in the lower Austrian Donau-
Auen (1983: 1.8-7.3 territories/10 ha, WINDIG & STEINER 1988).
A clear relationship between food supply, distance to water bodies and habitat quality, as documented for other
flycatcher species (IWATA et al, 2003), could not be found in this study. Canopy surface roughness as best
predictor for Collared Flycatcher occurrence could be an indicator for the primevalness of forest stands and is
mirroring the management history, respectively. The higher light influx at forest sites with higher surface
roughness could offer better foraging opportunities for Collared Flycatchers. Potential breeding competition with
tits and European Nuthatches (Sitta europaea) had little effect, at least at the spatial scale of our study. However,
as known from long term-studies from Poland, competition plays a minor role in near-natural systems (e.g.
WESOŁOWSKI 2003).
709
Conclusion
Our study shows not only the great importance of riverine forests for Collared Flycatchers but offers hints on the
high potential of remote sensing data for habitat analysis of forest bird species. In the Donau-Auen floodplain
forests, which are protected since 1996, the population of Collared Flycatchers could even increase in the following
years as more suitable habitats may develop due to the implemented process-orientated conservation approach.
Canopy roughness – a factor most likely related to forest age and floodplain dynamics – was identified as the most
important factor for predicting the presence of territories. Hence, the Collared Flycatcher could be a reliable
indicator for monitoring the conditions of floodplain forest ecosystems.
Acknowledgements
For supporting this study, we would like to thank the following people and institutions: Christian Baumgartner
(Nationalpark Donau-Auen), Hans-Martin Berg (NHM Wien), Alexander Faltejsek (governmental unit MA 49,
Vienna), Monika Kanzian (ÖBF), Robert Zeiner (ÖBF) and Karoline Zsak (Nationalpark Donau-Auen).
References
BAUER, H., BEZZEL, E., FIEDLER, W. 2012. Das Kompendium der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Ein umfassendes Handbuch
zu Biologie, Gefährdung und Schutz. Sonderausgabe in einem Band. Wiebelsheim.
BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL 2004. Birds in Europe. Population estimates, trends and conservation status. BirdLife
Conservation Series 12. Cambridge.
BRAWN, J.D., ROBINSON, S.K., THOMPSON, F.R. 2001. The role of disturbance in the ecology and conservation of
birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 251-276.
IWATA, T., NAKANO, S., MURAMAKI, M. 2003. Stream meanders increase insectivorous bird abundance in riparian
deciduous forests. Ecography 26: 325-337.
LÖHRL, H. J. 1951. Balz und Paarbildung beim Halsbandfliegenschnäpper. Journal of Ornithology 93: 41-60.
LLOYD H., CAHILL A., JONES M., MARSDEN S. 1998. Estimating bird densities using distance sampling. In: BIBBY C.,
JONES M. & MARSDEN S. (eds): Expedition field techniques: Bird surveys: 34-51. London.
LUNDBERG, A., ALATALO, R. 1992. The Pied Flycatcher. London.
REMM, J., LÕHMUS, A., REMM, K. 2006. Tree cavities in riverine forests: What determines their occurrence and use
by hole-nesting passerines? Forest Ecology and Management 221: 267-277.
SACHSLEHNER, L.M. 1995. Reviermerkmale und Brutplatzwahl in einer Naturhöhlenpopulation des
Halsbandschnäppers Ficdula albicollis im Wienerwald, Österreich. Vogelwelt 116: 245-254.
WESOŁOWSKI, T. 2003. Bird community dynamics in a primaeval forest – is interspecific competition important.
Ornis Hungarica 12: 51-62.
WINDING, N., STEINER, H.M. 1988. Donaukraftwerk Hainburg/Deutsch-Altenburg -Untersuchung der
Standortfrage (Zoologischer Teil) - 4. Vögel. In: WELAN, M. & WEDL, K. (eds.). Der Streit um Hainburg in
Verwaltungs- und Gerichtsakten. Niederösterreich-Reihe 5: 270-303. Laxenburg.
Contact
Barbara M. Waringer
barbara.magdalena.waringer@univie.ac.at
Universität Wien
Department für Botanik und Biodiversitätsforschung
Rennweg 14
1030 Wien
Austria
710