Access to this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Scientific Reports
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Scientic Reports | (2021) 11:15453 |
www.nature.com/scientificreports
Glutamic acid promotes hair
growth in mice
Carlos Poblete Jara 1,3,5,7*, Beatriz de Andrade Berti 1,3,5, Natália Ferreira Mendes 1,3,5,
Daiane Fátima Engel 2,3,5, Ariane Maria Zanesco 2,3,5, Gabriela Freitas Pereira de Souza
4,5, Renan de Medeiros Bezerra 1,3,5, Julia de Toledo Bagatin 6, Silvya Stuchi Maria‑Engler
6, Joseane Morari 2,3,5, William H. Velander7, Lício A. Velloso 2,3,5 & Eliana Pereira Araújo
1,3,5
Glutamic acid is the main excitatory neurotransmitter acting both in the brain and in peripheral
tissues. Abnormal distribution of glutamic acid receptors occurs in skin hyperproliferative conditions
such as psoriasis and skin regeneration; however, the biological function of glutamic acid in the
skin remains unclear. Using ex vivo, in vivo and in silico approaches, we showed that exogenous
glutamic acid promotes hair growth and keratinocyte proliferation. Topical application of glutamic
acid decreased the expression of genes related to apoptosis in the skin, whereas glutamic acid
increased cell viability and proliferation in human keratinocyte cultures. In addition, we identied the
keratinocyte glutamic acid excitotoxic concentration, providing evidence for the existence of a novel
skin signalling pathway mediated by a neurotransmitter that controls keratinocyte and hair follicle
proliferation. Thus, glutamic acid emerges as a component of the peripheral nervous system that
acts to control cell growth in the skin. These results raise the perspective of the pharmacological and
nutritional use of glutamic acid to treat skin diseases.
Glutamic acid (GA) is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system1. GA
receptors (Grin1, Grin2a, Gria2, and Grm1) and transporters (Slc1a1 and Slc1a2) have also been identied in
the skin across dierent species, such as mice, rats, and humans2–6. Moreover, in histological analyses, glutamate
has been identied in the epidermis, hair follicles and sebaceous glands7.
Several studies had shown that the skin performs as neuro-endocrine organ8–10 and its activities are mainly
regulated by local cutaneous factors9. is interaction between skin and environment factors can regulate Central
Nervous System (CNS) functions11. For instance, ultraviolet light absorption by the skin can upregulate neuroen-
docrine axes10,11 and it is suggested to modulate body weight12–14 and depression-like behaviour15. Specically,
UVB skin exposure stimulate corticotropin-releasing hormone protein production and gene expression in the
hypothalamus10.
Previous reports have been identied both the glutamate receptors and specic glutamate transporters in
epidermal keratinocytes2. Physiologically, glutamatergic signalling through N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)
receptor was previously shown to occur in hair follicle cells. GA signalling is essential for the innervation and
dierentiation of Grin1 positive Schwann cells during piloneural collar development in hair follicles4. Specically,
NMDA receptors are highly expressed in type I and type II terminal Schwann cells. ese cells are circumferen-
tially localized in the bulge border and cover most outer root sheath keratinocytes in the isthmus4.
In cell culture studies, NMDA induced an increase in the number of keratinocytes and in the intracellular
calcium concentration16; whereas, invivo studies have shown that the topical application of GA to wounded skin
in diabetic rats increases the rate of wound closure by inducing collagen synthesis and crosslinking17. In addi-
tion, 1% L-glutamic acid-loaded hydrogels accelerated vascularization and macrophage recruitment in diabetic
wound17. D-glutamic acid has also been shown to act on damaged skin by accelerating the barrier recovery3,
altogether suggesting a positive eect in skin repair.
OPEN
*
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientic Reports | (2021) 11:15453 |
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Because of the preliminary data suggesting that GA could act in the skin, we performed a search in patent
databases and found ve patent requests for the use of topical GA and derived molecules for hair growth stimula-
tion (patent numbers: CN106580722A, KR20150110149A, USOO58O1150A, FR2939038B1, and PI9302024A).
However, there are no studies reporting on the mechanisms mediating the actions of GA to stimulate hair growth
or epidermal cell proliferation. Here, we hypothesized that GA could induce proliferation and promote skin cell
viability. Using invivo, exvivo and in silico models, we show that GA promotes keratinocyte proliferation and
hair follicle growth by mechanisms that involve the control of vascularization and apoptosis.
Results
Glutamic acid increases human keratinocyte viability and proliferation. Firstly, we tested the
hypothesis that GA could stimulate proliferation and survival of HaCaT, primary keratinocytes, and broblast,
even in conuent culture conditions (Fig.1a). All traces of foetal calf serum were removed from the medium
to mitigate the eect of the growth factors present in the bovine serum. Aer two days of GA exposure, and
even under 100% conuence conditions, keratinocyte viability and proliferation were increased. We showed
that keratinocytes undergo a Gaussian distribution pattern of viability aer GA exposure (Fig.1b,c). Aer one
day of treatment, GA (100M and 10mM) increased HaCaT-keratinocyte viability (Supplementary Fig.1a).
ese dierences were higher aer two days of GA exposure: the 100M, 1mM, and 10mM GA concentrations
increased HaCaT keratinocyte viability within two days of treatment (Fig.1c). Moreover, 1M and 100M GA
concentrations increased primary keratinocyte viability within two days of treatment (Fig.1b). Also, human
broblast viability increased aer one day (Supplementary Fig.1c.) two days (Fig.1d) and four days (Supple-
mentary Fig.1d.) of GA exposure under 100% conuence conditions. Conversely, we identied an excitotoxic
concentration for keratinocytes at 100mM GA but not in broblast. Keratinocytes treated with 100mM GA
decreased cell viability aer one (Supplementary Fig.1a) and four days of treatment (Supplementary Fig.1b).
As the 10mM and 100mM GA concentrations showed opposite eects in the viability test (proliferative and
excitotoxic, respectively), we evaluated whether keratinocyte proliferation could be aected aer two days of
GA exposure (Fig.1g). Consistent with the viability results, BrdU positive keratinocytes were increased in the
10mM group (Fig.1f,g).
Topical glutamic acid decreases apoptotic related genes. To determine whether the results obtained
in cultured cells could be translated into an invivo model, we employed four dierent concentrations of GA on
the dorsal skin of Swiss mice (Fig.2a). To understand how GA promotes proliferation and improves viability,
we evaluated the expression of genes involved in apoptosis. ere were reductions of Bcl2 gene expression in
cells treated with GA 0.1%, 0.5% and 10% (Fig.2c). BAX was decreased in cells treated with 10% GA (Fig.2c).
However, we found no dierences in Casp9 expression (Fig.2c). Next, we evaluated whether topical GA could
stimulate the expression of genes related to inammatory response. We found no dierences in Il1-β, Tnf-α and
Il10. However, F4/80, a macrophage marker, and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (Mcp1) gene expres-
sion were increased aer 14days of 1% GA (Fig.2c). Additionally, topical GA 10% decreased the expression
of Glutamate Ionotropic Receptor NMDA Type Subunit 1 (Grin1) with no dierences in Glutamate Aspartate
Transporter 1 (Glast) expression (Fig.2c).
Topical glutamic acid accelerates hair growth in healthy mice. Surprisingly, 1% and 10% GA accel-
erated hair growth aer 14days of topical treatment (Fig.3a). Using photomicrographs, we also showed that GA
increased external root sheath across all GA concentrations (Fig.3b, Supplementary Fig.1f.) with no hyperkera-
tosis eect. We also consistently identied increased BrdU positive cells in the hair follicles and epidermal layer
aer 14-days of GA topical treatment (Figs.3c, 4f).
Exogenous topical glutamic acid increased vascularization. We identied macroscopic dierences
in vascularization aer 14days of GA treatment. e 0.5% and 10% GA topical application increased skin vas-
cularization (Fig.4a,b). To further explore these ndings, we evaluated whether GA could induce the expression
of genes involved in vascular regulation. We found that 1% GA topical treatment increased Hypoxia Inducible
Factor 1 Subunit Alpha (Hif1a), a master regulator of vascularization 18,19 (Fig.4c). Also, 1% GA topical treat-
ment increased the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (Vegf), which induces proliferation and migration
of vascular endothelial cells and is essential for physiological angiogenesis 20–22 (Fig.4c). However, we found no
dierence in gene expression of CD31 aer 14days of topical GA treatment (Fig.4c).
Single cell RNA sequencing analysis showed dierences in glutamate receptor and transporter
localization between mice and human. We evaluated glutamate receptor expression using immu-
nostaining, quantitative PCR, and single-cell RNA sequencing techniques. We identied that NMDA receptor
subunits Grin1, Grin2a, Grin2b and Grin2c are expressed in the skin (Fig.4d,e), and Grin2b is expressed speci-
cally in keratin 14 + cells (Fig.4d,e). Due to the wide number of subunits (5 GA receptor families with 26 subu-
nits), we used a single cell RNA sequencing approach to improve accuracy (Fig.5a). Using public transcriptome
libraries of skin tissue, we analysed ~ 73,000 mice and human epidermal cells from back (mice), foreskin, trunk,
and scalp (human). is cross-species analysis showed a similar percentage (5%) of glutamatergic epidermal pop-
ulation in the skin (Fig.5b,d). In humans, we identied NMDA receptors as the highest expressed subunits in the
basal layer and hair follicular cell clusters, specically the GRIN2A subunit (Fig.5b). In addition, we identied
melanocytes expressing Glutamate Ionotropic Receptor Delta Type Subunit 1 (GRD1) (Fig.5b), granular cells
expressing Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter 4 (SLC1A6) and basal layer cells expressing Excitatory Amino
Acid Transporter 1 (SLC1A3) (Fig.5c). In mice, we identied Grin2d (in the sebaceous gland) and Grik1 (in the
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientic Reports | (2021) 11:15453 |
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
hair follicle bulge) as the most expressed subunits (Fig.5d). Additionally, we identied the expression of Excita-
tory Amino Acid Transporter 1 and 3 (Slc1a3 and Slc1a1) (Fig.5e) in 50% of all sebaceous gland cells (Fig.5e).
To predict a GA-mediated cell signalling pathway between GA pathway and hair follicle-related genes, we
used computational interaction network analysis STRING23. In this way, we used glutamate receptor pathway
genes and hair cycle genes ontologies (Supplementary Fig.2). We found that GA receptors interact with hair cycle
genes through the tyrosine-protein kinase Fyn, Ca 2 + /calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and
protein kinase B (Akt) (Fig.5f). Additionally, we found Bcl2 as a common apoptotic regulator between both hair
cycle and GA pathways (Fig.5f). To conrm, we evaluated the protein expression of Fyn, CaMKII and Akt in the
14-day topical GA-treated mice (Fig.5g–i). We found no dierences in Fyn quantication (Fig.5i). However,
we conrmed that AKT2 phosphorylation increased aer 14days of topical 1% GA treatment (Fig.5g). Also,
pCaMKII increased aer 14days of topical 10% GA treatment (Fig.5h).
Figure1. Eects of GA treatment in cell culture and invivo. Experimental design of cell culture experiment
using HaCaT, Primary human keratinocytes, and human broblast treated with dierent concentration of GA
(a). MTT viability test results of Primary human keratinocytes with 2days of Glutamic acid exposure (b). MTT
viability test results of HaCaT with 2days of Glutamic acid exposure (c). MTT viability test results of huma
broblast with 2days of Glutamic acid exposure (d). MTT viability test of primary keratinocytes in triplicate in
2 dierent experiments. MTT viability test of HaCaT keratinocytes in quadruplicate in 4 dierent experiments.
MTT viability test of human broblast in quadruplicate in 2–3 dierent experiments. Immunostaining results
of HaCaT keratinocytes treated with Glutamic acid 10mM or 100mM in DMEM compared to Control group
treated with DMEM (g). Immunostaining results of HaCaT keratinocytes in triplicate in 4 dierent experiments,
GA for 48h and, nally, 3h with BrdU, scale bar 50m. e proportion of BrdU-immunoreactive increased
aer exposure to GA 10mM (f). Data is presented as mean ± SEM. N = 4 per group. p = 0.03 t-test Control versus
GA 10mM; p = 0.03 one-way ANOVA.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientic Reports | (2021) 11:15453 |
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Discussion
Currently, there are no studies describing GA treatment or even the eect of GA on hair growth or epidermal
cell proliferation. However, upon searching through major patent agencies, we found ve patents/patent requests
claiming the benets of topical GA (or derived molecules) for hair growth. One of these patents described the
use of GA as a hair conditioner (patent number CN106580722A, China) for hair restoration and the prevention
of alopecia. Another patent showed a Poly-Gamma-GA composition for preventing hair loss and promoting hair
growth (KR20150110149A, Korea). In addition, there were synthetic compounds of GA attached to minoxidil
for keratinocyte growth and hair growth in humans (USOO58O1150A, USA), a 2 to 12% GA topical cream for
combating hair loss or alopecia in humans (FR2939038B1, France) and, nally, 42 dierent molecules derived
from L-glutamic acid were described as hair growth promoters (PI9302024A, Brazil). However, reviewing all
these patents/patents requests, we could nd no description of the cellular mechanisms responsible for the
stimulation of hair growth in response to GA application. us, our work provides experimental proof of a
mechanistic link between GA and hair growth.
Here, we evaluated some of the potential mechanisms involved in eect of GA on hair growth. First, using a
cell culture approach, we challenged 100% conuent primary human keratinocytes, HaCaT-keratinocytes, and
human Fibroblast (in medium depleted of foetal bovine serum (FBS)/growth factor supply) to continue growing.
Our results showed that GA increases the proliferation and viability of keratinocytes, even under these extreme
conditions. us, GA could represent an interesting approach as a cell growth media supplement, replacing tradi-
tional supplements that are more expensive. is nding is further supported by data published previously, which
shows that MK-801, an antagonist of the GA receptor (NMDA receptor), decreases the proliferation of primary
human keratinocytes2 and also prevents hyperplasia induced by acetone3, suggesting an anti-proliferative eect.
e skin is a critical peripheral neuro-endocrine-immune structure that interact to central regulatory
systems24. As a response, the skin can trigger cutaneous nerve endings to inform the CNS on changes in the
epidermal or dermal environments to produce neural or immune responses at the local and systemic levels24.
Human skin reacts to several neuropeptides and neurotransmitters by paracrine, autocrine, vasculature and
nerves stimulus25. Primary and HaCaT keratinocytes are sources of Glutamic acid secreting ≈ 1mM -glutamic
Figure2. Topical glutamic acid in mice. Experimental design of Swiss mice treated topically one at day with
dierent concentration of GA for 14days (a). Dierent GA concentrations (Control, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1% and 10%
GA) for topical animal treatment were equal to 5.5 pH (b). RT-PCR of Bcl2, Bax, Casp9, F4/80, Mcp1, Il1β,
Tnfα, Il10, Grin1 and Glast genes from skin samples aer 14days of GA treatment (c). GAPDH was used as
endogenous control. Data is presented as mean ± SEM * < p 0.05 ANOVA. 5–6 animals per group.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientic Reports | (2021) 11:15453 |
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
acid to the culture medium when 100% conuent26 suggesting a paracrine or autocrine stimulation. Indeed,
major aspect of neuroendocine regulation in the skin, specically the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and
melatoninoergic system in the skin was previously discussed8. GA has potent neurotoxic eects, and this could
represent a challenge for either experimental or clinical use. Elevated amounts of GA lead to neuronal death in
a process described as excitotoxicity27–29. GA transporters are a potent GA uptake system, acting as a neuronal
compensatory response for excitotoxicity. GA transporters are known to prevent disproportionate activation of
Figure3. GA stimulates hair growth and increased BrdU + cells. Dose–response results of topical GA
application on the dorsal region of mice with Vaseline (CTL) or 0.1%, 0.5%, 1% and 10% GA for 14days
(a–c). 5–6 animals per group. Hair growth eect aer 14days of GA treatment on the back of Swiss mice (a).
Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining sample of the back of 14day treated mice (hair follicle pointed with
yellow arrows), scale bar 250m, samples from 3 dierent animals (b). Immunostaining results of skin samples
treated 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, and 10% Glutamic acid compared to Control group (Vaseline) (c). Immunostaining
results of skin samples from 3 dierent animals, GA topical treatment for 14days and, nally, 2h with
intraperitoneal BrdU. Yellow arrows indicate BrdU + cells.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientic Reports | (2021) 11:15453 |
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure4. Topical GA and blood vessel. Skin samples treated for 14days with topical GA topical. Upside-
down back skin samples showing vessel dierences between Vaseline (CTL) or 0.1%, 0.5%, 1% and 10% GA
treatments (a). Quantication of blood vessel area aer 14days of vaseline (CTL) or 0.1%, 0.5%, 1% and 10%
GA treatment (b). Gene expression of Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1 Subunit Alpha (Hif1a), Vascular Endothelial
Growth Factor A (Vegf ) and the Platelet and Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 (Cd31) from full-thickness
back skin aer 14days of GA treatment (c). GA receptor characterization in mice skin of dierent GA subunits
(d-e). Immunostaining against NMDA Grin1, Grin2b, Grin2a and Grin2c GA receptor expressed in the
epidermal layer of the skin of untreated mice (d–e). Yellow arrows indicate colocalization of K14 + Grin2b + cells
(d). Quantication of positive BrdU epidermal and hair follicle cells of mice skin treated with vaseline (CTL)
or 0.1%, 0.5%, 1% and 10% of GA (f). BrdU and quantitative PCR data are presented as mean ± SEM * < p 0.05
ANOVA. 5–6 animals per group.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientic Reports | (2021) 11:15453 |
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
GA receptors by constantly removing GA from the extracellular space30–32. Here, we determined the excitotoxic
GA concentration. Invitro, 100mM GA decreased keratinocyte viability, and topical GA decreased Bcl2 and
Bax expression. Altogether, our results support the excitotoxic eect of higher concentrations of pH-neutralized
GA in keratinocytes.
To understand the exogenous GA eect on the skin, we explored the GA transporter landscape at single-cell
resolution in human and mice skins (Fig.5b,d). Additionally, we showed Slc1a3 expression using quantitative
PCR, and a similar Slc1a3 (Glast) expression aer exogenous GA application (Fig.2c). Future research could
help to identify the role of GA-induced excitotoxicity and the GA uptake system in the skin.
Regarding the GA receptors, different subpopulations of glutamatergic cells have been extensively
described33–36. In the skin, previous reports identied the localization of GA receptors and transporters in the
epidermis from rats and mice, as well as in human keratinocytes2,3,5. ese studies showed similar cross-species
characteristics: a smaller subpopulation of cells expressing receptors and transporters2. Consistent with these
ndings, here, we showed a small subpopulation of epidermal cells expressing GA receptors along the skin,
with varying intensity (Fig.5b,d). Our results suggest that these glutamatergic keratinocytes are responsive to
exogenous GA stimulation.
Previous reports showed that vascularization increases during the anagen phase of the hair cycle and decreases
during the catagen and telogen phases. is angiogenesis process was spatially correlated with the upregulation
of VEGF37. Also, the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) has been shown to coordinate the up-regulation of multiple
genes controlling neovascularization, such as Vegf38. Here, we showed that Hif1a and Vegf expression increased
aer 14days of GA topical treatment on the back skin of mice with a remarkable change in angiogenesis, as
previously shown17.
e Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, encoded by the gene Hif1a showed to stimulate hair growth39 and some
HIF-1α-stimulating agents signicantly increase dermal papilla cell proliferation40. Minoxidil 2,4-diamino-
6-piperidinopyrimidine3-oxide, a vasodilator used for the treatment of pattern hair loss, is a direct inhibitor of
PHD-2 (prolyl-hydroxylase 2) which hydroxylates HIF-1α causing its degradation. Also, Minoxidil stimulates
the transcription of hypoxia-response element genes such as VEGF39–41. Here, we showed dierent concentra-
tions of GA with hair growth and angiogenic eects. Publicly available patents proclaim benet by using high
percentage of GA concentration for skin treatment and hair growth stimulation. e 10% GA treatment showed
hair growth and angiogenesis stimulation, but no dierences in Hif1a expression aer 14day of topical GA.
Previous studies showed the ranges of GA saturation by specic GA concentration 42–44. In this way, we suggest
that 10% GA topical treatment could achieve a post-acute signal saturation secondary to the time exposure
and the Glutamic Acid concentration here presented. However, more studies are needed to elucidate a possible
saturation and angiogenic eect of 14days GA topical treatment on the back skin of mice.
A recent study supports that GA-mediated signalling could be involved in hair growth45. e authors showed
that glutamine, a molecule similar to GA, controls the fate of stem cells in the hair follicle. e capacity of the
outer root sheath cells to return to the stem cell state requires suppression of a metabolic switch from glutamine
metabolism and is regulated by the mTORC2-Akt signalling axis45. Similarly, our result suggests that GA increases
AKT phosphorylation and hair follicle cell stimulation. In this way, our results further suggest that GA activates
the hair cycle by stimulating the stem cells to dierentiate into the outer root sheath. However, future studies
should describe the hair-follicle cycle modulation aer topical GA treatments.
Taken together, the cell-based and experimental outcomes of this study provide a mechanistic advance in
the characterization of GA-induced eects on hair growth and could become an attractive approach to treat hair
growth disorders, or for aesthetic hair stimulation.
Further studies should focus on the relationship between skin disorders and GA and how GA, present in
food, could impact on skin health.
Methods
Experimental animals. Eight-week-old male Swiss mice (n = 6) were obtained from the Breeding Animal
Center of the University of Campinas. Animals were maintained under pathogen-free conditions in individual
cages on a 12–12-h dark–light cycle, at 21–23°C. Mice received food and water adlibitum. Mice were anesthe-
tized with intraperitoneal injections (according to body weight), using ketamine hydrochloride 80mg/kg and
xylazine chlorhydrate 8mg/kg. Hair was removed from the dorsal region (1.0cm × 2.5cm) of the anesthetized
mice using a mechanical razor and depilatory cream (Veet). e dorsal region of all mice was carefully cleaned
to remove any trace of Veet cream. Animal experiments were approved by e Animal Ethical Committee at
the University of Campinas, Brazil (certicate of approval no. 4930–1/2018). All experiments were performed in
accordance with the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals”, National Academy Press, 1996 guide-
lines of standard humane animal care. All the animal experiments have been performed following the ARRIVE
guidelines.
Topical glutamic acid treatment. e dorsal region of mice was treated once daily using dierent con-
centrations of GA. To ensure a uniform 200 L treatment, we used dierent syringes preloaded with Vaseline
(control), 0.1%, 0.5%, 1% or 10% GA (Supplementary Fig.1c). e treatment was spread manually using gloves
which were changing between each group. To avoid removal of the treatment, mice used Elizabethan collars 8
of 14 days of treatment.
Topical glutamic acid composition. We made ve dierent formulations: 0% (Control), 0.1% (6mM),
0.5% (30mM), 1% (60mM) and 10% (600mM) of GA. Table1 shows the dierent composition of each treat-
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientic Reports | (2021) 11:15453 |
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientic Reports | (2021) 11:15453 |
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
ment (Table1). e pH of the formulations was adjusted using aqueous NaOH until the desired pH 5.5 was
achieved (Fig.1f). is pH value was chosen to resemble the skin surface pH46.
Primary keratinocytes isolation. Normal human skin from healthy donors were obtained by postec-
tomy (University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil). Keratinocytes were isolated and cul-
tured as described previously47,48. Declaration of Helsinki Principles and approved by the Ethics Committees
for Research (HU CEP Case No. 943/09 and CEP FCF/USP 534). Parents and/or guardians were informed and
signed written consent.
Cell culture MTT and BrdU. Human keratinocyte lineage (HaCaT) passage 27–30 were cultured in a 37°C,
7% CO2 incubator with Dulbecco’s modied Eagle’s medium (DMEM) medium supplemented with 5% FBS to
100% conuence in 6-well plates. Primary keratinocytes passage 3–6 were cultured in a 37°C, 7% CO2 incubator
with KGM Gold Keratinocyte Growth Medium to 100% conuence in 6-well plates. Human Fibroblast cell line
(BJ-5ta) passage 28–30 were cultured in a 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator with 4:1 mixture of High glucose Dulbecco’s
Modied Eagle’s Medium and Medium 199 supplemented with 10% FBS and 0.01mg/ml hygromycin B, to
100% conuence in 6-well plates. We replaced the culture medium 2–3 times a week. A 3-4,5-dimethylthiazol-
2-yl-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to analyse cell viability, as previously described49.
MTT solution was prepared in Krebs-HEPES buer (10mM HEPES, 1.2mM MgCl2, 144mM NaCl, 11mM
glucose, 2mM CaCl2 and 5.9mM KCl). Aer 100% conuence 6-wellplates, HaCaT and human broblast were
incubated with the dierent concentrations of GA in DMEM without FBS for 1, 2 and 4days. Primary keratino-
cytes were incubated with the dierent concentrations of GA in KGM Gold medium without growth factors for
2days. Aer treatment, the medium was removed, MTT solution (0.5mg/mL) was added to each well and the
plates were incubated at 37°C for 3h. e solution was then removed and 300 L of DMSO was added before
being incubated in the dark with 60rpm shaking. e absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 540nm in
a microplate reader (Globomax). HaCaT culture experiments were performed in quadruplicate in 4 dierent
experiments. Primary keratinocytes culture experiments were performed in triplicate in 2 dierent experiments.
Human broblast culture experiments were performed in triplicate in 2–3 dierent experiments. BrdU experi-
ments were performed as previously described26. Briey, to assess the eect of GA on cell proliferation, HaCaT
human keratinocytes were maintained DMEM (Gibco) containing 4.5g/L glucose, 4mM L-glutamine, 100
units/mL of penicillin, 100g/mL of streptomycin and 10% FBS. Incubation conditions were 37°C in 5% CO2/
humidied air. HaCaT cells were plated on coverslips in 24-well plates (1 × 105 cells/well) and exposed to GA for
48h (10 and 100mM) in DMEM without FBS. Aer treatment, cells were incubated with BrdU (10µM, Sigma)
for 3h, then xed with 4% PFA in 0.1M PBS for 10min at RT. For BrdU staining, cells were washed with PBS,
and DNA was denatured with 1N HCl for 1h at RT. Cells were blocked for 1h in blocking solution containing
10% goat serum and 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS, followed by an incubation with primary (rat anti-BrdU; 1:200;
Ab6326); and secondary (goat anti-rat FITC, 1:200; sc2011) antibodies prepared in 3% goat serum/0.2% Triton
X-100 in PBS, and incubated overnight and for 2h, respectively. e nuclei were labelled with DAPI, and cover-
slips were mounted onto glass slides for microscope imaging. Images were captured on uorescence microscopy
(Olympus BX41). e results of BrdU immunopositivity cells represent the average of 3 coverslips per experi-
mental replicate, where 3 elds were imaged per coverslip and averaged. e number of immunopositive cells
was quantied per image using the ImageJ soware and are expressed as a percentage relative to the total DAPI
nuclei.
Animal photo documentation. Hair growth processes were photo documented using a D610 Nikon digi-
tal camera (Nikon Systems, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). We used a stand to secure a similar distance from the camera to
the treated skin site, and the same person took the photos.
Vessel analysis. Vascular density measurements were calculated from digital images obtained using a D610
Nikon digital camera (Nikon Systems, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). We used a stand to secure a similar distance from the
camera to the upside-down back skin samples. Vascular density ratio was calculated vascular as follow: vessel
area/total area * 100%50. e number of pixels were digitally determined by densitometry, using Image J soware
(National Institutes of Health).
Figure5. Cross-species skin GA receptor landscape using single-cell RNA sequencing. Generation of glutamic
acid receptor landscape using public data reveals GA distribution at single cell resolution in mice and humans
(b–e). Schematic representation of the single-cell RNA sequencing analysis using publicly available datasets
from mice and human epidermal layers (a). Human Epidermal Glutamate receptors (b) and transporter
expression (c). Mice Epidermal Glutamate receptors (d) and transporter expression (e). Glutamic acid receptor
and hair cycle Protein–Protein Interaction Network performed with STRING V11 (f). Glutamic acid and hair
cycle interactome were retrieved with the data-mining toolkit STRING. Closer interactors of glutamic acid and
hair cycle ontologies (GO:0007215 and GO:0042633) were selected and categorized by coloured nodes. Yellow
arrows indicate shared shell interactors, red nodes indicate glutamate receptor signaling pathway genes and
blue nodes hair cycle genes (f). Display of cropped blots quantied to conrm the Protein–Protein Interaction
Network prediction (g–i). Western blot analysis of AKT Phosphorylation (g), phospho-CaMKII (h) and Fyn
quantication (i). Full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Fig.3. Western blot data are presented as
mean ± SEM * < p 0.05 ANOVA. 4–5 animals per group.
◂
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientic Reports | (2021) 11:15453 |
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Histology. Aer 14days of treatment, tissues were harvested and xed by immersion in formaldehyde over-
night. Any traces of formaldehyde were removed by 3 washes of PBS 1x. e tissues were processed in alcohol at
dierent concentrations (70%, 80%, 95% and 100%), xylol and paran, before being xed in paran blocks and
sectioned at 5.0m. In total, 3 to 5 sessions were placed on microscope slides pre-treated with poly-L-lysine. To
evaluate cell and extracellular matrix morphology, the skin sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin
(H&E). e sections were incubated with haematoxylin for 30s, rinsed in water, incubated for 30s with eosin,
rinsed again in water, and dehydrated. e slides were mounted in Entellan® and then analysed; digital images
were captured under bright-eld microscopy.
Protein–protein interaction networks. Protein functional interaction networks were performed
using STRING v11. e default functional interaction network was congured to evidence meaning of net-
work edges, experiments, and databases in active interaction sources. Mus musculus organism was visualized by
known molecular action. We analysed two Biological Processes using the Gene Ontology Term from the Mouse
Genome Informatics database: A permalink webpage of Glutamate receptor (GO:0,007,215) and hair follicle
(GO:0,042,633). e gene ontologies interaction network is accessible through https:// versi on- 11-0. string- db.
org/ cgi/ netwo rk. pl? taskId= lKUAb EZgGk Vu for selected genes and https:// versi on- 11-0. string- db. org/ cgi/
netwo rk. pl? netwo rkId= 7i1fM IP01x qT for all genes.
Single‑cell RNA sequencing data acquisition, ltering, and processing.. In silico analyses were
performed using a HP ENVY 17 Leap Motion SE NB PC notebook with 16GB RAM and four-cores Intel i7
processor. Sample expression matrices (mice and humans) were downloaded from Gene Expression Omni-
bus and European Genome-phenome Archive: GSE67602 and EGAS00001002927. Cells were ltered by their
total number of reads, by their number of detected genes and by their mitochondrial percentage. For mice, we
used nFeature_RNA > 10 and < 6,000, nCount_RNA > 100 and < 50,000, percent.mt < 9.5 settings. For humans,
we use d nFeature_RNA > 100 and < 5,000, nCount_RNA > 100 and < 25,000 and percent.mt < 6 settings. Samples
were processed in Seurat v3.1.5 using the default Seurat workow. For clustering and visualization, we used
the default Seurat pipeline gold standard and dot plot visualization. Cluster names were annotated to cell types
according to original articles of Cheng etal. and Joost etal.51,52.
Western blotting. For protein quantication, mice were treated topically 14days with GA, once a day. Ani-
mals were anesthetized (ketamine hydrochloride 80mg/kg and xylazine chlorhydrate 8mg/kg) using Labinsane53,
placed them in ventral decubitus position for cleaning the skin. en, we harvested a 6mm full-thickness skin
sample54 from the back of each animal using a 6mm biopsy punch. Immediately aer the extraction, the tissues
were stored in − 80°C, until further analysis. e animals were sacriced by anesthetic deepening. We used 5–6
animals per group. For the immunoblot experiments, the tissues were homogenized in Radioimmunoprecipita-
tion assay buer (150mM NaCl, 50mM Tris, 5mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0,1%
sodium dodecyl sulfate, and supplemented with protease inhibitors). Insoluble materials were removed by cen-
trifugation 11,000 rpm for 40min at 4°C, and the supernatant was used for protein quantication by the biuret
reagent protein assay. Laemmli buer (0.5M Tris, 30% glycerol, 10% SDS, 0.6M DTT, 0.012 bromophenol blue)
was added to the samples. One hundred micrograms of proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred
to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad) using a Trans-Blot SD Semi-Dry Transfer Cell (Bio-Rad) for 1h at 17V
(constant) in buer containing methanol and SDS. Blots were blocked in a 5% skimmed milk powder solution in
TBST (1 × TBS and 0.1% Tween 20) for 2h at RT, washed with TBST, and incubated with the primary antibodies
for 24h at 4°C. e primary antibodies used were anti-pCaMKII (Abcam, ab32678) and anti-Fyn3 (Santa Cruz,
sc-16). HRP-coupled secondary antibodies (1:5000, ermo Scientic) were used for detection of the conjugate
by chemiluminescence and visualization by exposure to an Image Quant LAS4000 (GE Healthcare, Life Sci-
ences). Anti-β-actin (Abcam, ab8227) was used as a loading control. e intensities of the bands were digitally
determined by densitometry, using Image J soware (National Institutes of Health).
Immunohistochemistry. Skin expressions of Grin1, Grin2a, Grin2b, and Grin2c were identied by immu-
nohistochemical staining. Immunohistochemistry was performed using the skin samples (n = 5). Tissue samples
Table 1. Glutamic acid-based creams used in the invivo experiments. Compound description of Control, GA
0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, and 10% w/w topical treatment.
Compounds Vaseline 6mM
(GA 0.1%) 30mM
(GA 0.5%) 60mM
(GA 1%) 600mM
(GA 10%)
L-Glutamic Acid − 0.03g 0.15g 0.3g 3g
NaOH 35 µL 160 µL 320 µL 2.25mL
Liquid Vaseline 2.77mL 2.77mL 2.77mL 2.77mL 2.77mL
Solid Vaseline 24.78g 24.75g 24.63g 24.48g 21.75g
Tween 20 200 µL 200 µL 200 µL 200 µL 200 µL
ddH20 2.24mL 2.215mL 2.09mL 1.91mL −
HCl 0.5 µL − − − −
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientic Reports | (2021) 11:15453 |
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
were immersed in 4% formaldehyde, overnight. Tissue samples were washed three times with PBS 1x, cryo-
preserved in sucrose 20% for 3days and 40% for 1week. Samples were then embedded in OCT and sectioned
using a cryostat (Leica CM1860). e sections (20m) were immunostained with the following primary anti-
bodies: Grin1 (1:100, sc1467), Grin2a (1:100, sc1468), Grin2b (1:100, sc1469), Grin2c (1:100, sc9057), BrdU
(1:200, ab6326) and keratin 14 (1:100, sc53253). VECTASHIELD with DAPI was used as a mounting medium
for nuclear visualization. Images were obtained using a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP5 II). For the invivo
BrdU experiment, we treated the mice intraperitoneally, as previously described55. Briey, we applied one single
injection of BrdU (150mg/kg in buer citrate) 3h before skin harvest.
Real‑time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‑qPCR). e total RNA content was
extracted from the tissue using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). For each sample, two micrograms of RNA were
reverse transcribed to cDNA, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Tran-
scription Kit, Life Technologies). Gene expression analysis was performed via RT-qPCR using TaqMan Univer-
sal PCR Master Mix (7500 detection system, Applied Biosystems). e primers used were: Bcl2: Mm00477631_
m1; Bax: Mm00432051_m1; Casp9: Mm00516563_m1; F4/80: Mm00802529_m1; Mcp1: Mm00441242_m1;
Il1b: Mm00434228_m1; TNFa: Mm00443258_m1; Il10: Mm01288386_m1; Grin1: Mm00433790_m1; Glast:
Mm00600697_m1; Hif1a: Mm00468869_m1; Vegf: Mm00437306_m1; and Cd31: Mm01242576_m1 (er-
mosher). Analyses were run using 4 L (10ng/L) cDNA, 0.625 L primer/probe solution, 1.625 L H2O and
6.25 L 2X TaqMan Universal MasterMix. GAPDH (Mm99999915_g1) was employed as a reference gene. Gene
expression was obtained using the SDS System 7500 soware (Applied Biosystems).
Received: 24 October 2020; Accepted: 14 July 2021
References
1. Zhou, Y. & Danbolt, N. C. Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the healthy brain. J. Neural Transm. 121(8), 799–817 (2014).
2. Genever, P. G. et al. Evidence for a novel glutamate-mediated signaling pathway in keratinocytes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 112(3),
337–342 (1999).
3. Fuziwara, S., Inoue, K. & Denda, M. NMDA-type glutamate receptor is associated with cutaneous barrier homeostasis. J. Invest.
Dermatol. 120(6), 1023–1029 (2003).
4. Woo, S.-H., Baba, Y., Franco, A. M., Lumpkin, E. A. & Owens, D. M. Excitatory glutamate is essential for development and main-
tenance of the piloneural mechanoreceptor. Development 139(4), 740 (2012).
5. Morhenn, V. B. et al. Evidence for an NMDA receptor subunit in human keratinocytes and rat cardiocytes. Eur. J. Pharmacol.
268(3), 409–414 (1994).
6. Morhenn, V. B., Murakami, M., O’Grady, T., Nordberg, J. & Gallo, R. L. Characterization of the expression and function of
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in keratinocytes. Exp. Dermatol. 13(8), 505–511 (2004).
7. Nordlind, K., Johansson, O., Lidén, S. & Hökfelt, T. Glutamate- and aspartate-like immunoreactivities in human normal and
inamed skin. Virchows. Archiv B. 64(1), 75–82 (1993).
8. Zmijewski, M. A. & Slominski, A. T. Neuroendocrinology of the skin. Dermato-Endocrinol. 3(1), 3–10 (2011).
9. Slominski, A. & Wortsman, J. Neuroendocrinology of the skin. Endocr. Rev. 21(5), 457–487 (2000).
10. Skobowiat, C. & Slominski, A. T. UVB activates hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis in C57BL/6 mice. J. Investig. Dermatol.
135(6), 1638–1648 (2015).
11. Slominski, A. T., Zmijewski, M. A., Plonka, P. M., Szaarski, J. P. & Paus, R. How UV light touches the brain and endocrine system
through skin, and why. Endocrinology 159(5), 1992–2007 (2018).
12. Geldenhuys, S. et al. Ultraviolet radiation suppresses obesity and symptoms of metabolic syndrome independently of vitamin D
in mice fed a high-fat diet. Diabetes 63(11), 3759–3769 (2014).
13. Pulgar, J. et al. UV radiation impacts body weight, oxygen consumption, and shelter selection in the intertidal vertebrate Girella
laevifrons. Sci. Total Environ. 578, 317–322 (2017).
14. Londero, J. E. L., Dos Santos, C. P., Segatto, A. L. A. & Passaglia, S. A. Impacts of UVB radiation on food consumption of forest
specialist tadpoles. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 143, 12–18 (2017).
15. Han, M. et al. UV irradiation to mouse skin decreases hippocampal neurogenesis and synaptic protein expression via HPA axis
activation. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 15574 (2017).
16. Fischer, M. et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors inuence the intracellular calcium concentration of keratinocytes. Exp. Dermatol.
13(8), 512–519 (2004).
17. angavel, P. et al. Accelerated healing of diabetic wounds treated with -glutamic acid loaded hydrogels through enhanced col-
lagen deposition and angiogenesis: an invivo study. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 10701 (2017).
18. Semenza, G. L. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1: Master regulator of O2 homeostasis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 8(5), 588–594 (1998).
19. Chen, L., Endler, A. & Shibasaki, F. Hypoxia and angiogenesis: Regulation of hypoxia-inducible factors via novel binding factors.
Exp. Mol. Med. 41(12), 849–857 (2009).
20. Ferrara, N. VEGF and the quest for tumour angiogenesis factors. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2(10), 795–803 (2002).
21. Rumney, R. M. H. et al. Invivo delivery of VEGF RNA and protein to increase osteogenesis and intraosseous angiogenesis. Sci.
Rep. 9(1), 17745 (2019).
22. Leung, D. W., Cachianes, G., Kuang, W. J., Goeddel, D. V. & Ferrara, N. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic
mitogen. Science 246(4935), 1306–1309 (1989).
23. Szklarczyk, D. et al. STRING v11: Protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery
in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 47(D1), D607–D613 (2019).
24. Slominski AT, Zmijewski MA, Skobowiat C, Zbytek B, Slominski RM, Steketee JD. Sensing the environment: regulation of local
and global homeostasis by the skin’s neuroendocrine system. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 2012;212:v, vii, 1–115.
25. R amot, Y., Böhm, M. & Paus, R. Translational neuroendocrinology of human skin: Concepts and perspectives. Trends Mol. Med.
27(1), 60–74 (2021).
26. Fischer, M., Glanz, D., Urbatzka, M., Brzoska, T. & Abels, C. Keratinocytes: a source of the transmitter L-glutamate in the epidermis.
Exp. Dermatol. 18(12), 1064–1066 (2009).
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scientic Reports | (2021) 11:15453 |
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
27. Dong, X.-x, Wang, Y. & Qin, Z.-h. Molecular mechanisms of excitotoxicity and their relevance to pathogenesis of neurodegenera-
tive diseases. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 30(4), 379–387 (2009).
28. Piña-Crespo JC, Sanz-Blasco S, Lipton SA. Concept of excitotoxicity via glutamate receptors. In: Kostrzewa RM, editor. Handbook
of neurotoxicity. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2014. pp. 1015–38.
29. Crabbé, M., Dirkx, N., Casteels, C. & Laere, K. V. Excitotoxic neurodegeneration is associated with a focal decrease in metabotropic
glutamate receptor type 5 availability: an invivo PET imaging study. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 12916 (2019).
30. O’Donovan, S. M., Sullivan, C. R. & McCullumsmith, R. E. e role of glutamate transporters in the pathophysiology of neuropsy-
chiatric disorders. NPJ Schizophr. 3(1), 32 (2017).
31. Parsons, M. P. et al. Real-time imaging of glutamate clearance reveals normal striatal uptake in Huntington disease mouse models.
Nat. Commun. 7(1), 11251 (2016).
32. Paoletti, P., Bellone, C. & Zhou, Q. NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease.
Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14(6), 383–400 (2013).
33. Tatti, R . et al. A population of glomerular glutamatergic neurons controls sensory information transfer in the mouse olfactory
bulb. Nat. Commun. 5(1), 3791 (2014).
34. Heikkinen, A. E., Möykkynen, T. P. & Korpi, E. R. Long-lasting Modulation of Glutamatergic Transmission in VTA Dopamine
Neurons aer a Single Dose of Benzodiazepine Agonists. Neuropsychopharmacology 34(2), 290–298 (2009).
35. Montardy, Q. et al. Characterization of glutamatergic VTA neural population responses to aversive and rewarding conditioning
in freely-moving mice. Science Bulletin. 64(16), 1167–1178 (2019).
36. Yamaguchi, T., Qi, J., Wang, H.-L., Zhang, S. & Morales, M. Glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurons in the mouse ventral teg-
mental area. Eur. J. Neurosci. 41(6), 760–772 (2015).
37. Yano, K., Brown, L. F. & Detmar, M. Control of hair growth and follicle size by VEGF-mediated angiogenesis. J. Clin. Investig.
107(4), 409–417 (2001).
38. Oladipupo, S. et al. VEGF is essential for hypoxia-inducible factor-mediated neovascularization but dispensable for endothelial
sprouting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(32), 13264–13269 (2011).
39. Houschyar, K. S. et al. Molecular mechanisms of hair growth and regeneration: Current understanding and novel paradigms.
Dermatology 236(4), 271–280 (2020).
40. Bukowiecki, J., Pförringer, D., or, D., Duscher, D. & Brett, E. HIF-1α stimulators function equally to leading hair loss agents in
enhancing dermal papilla growth. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 33(6), 309–316 (2020).
41. Yum, S. et al. Minoxidil Induction of VEGF Is Mediated by Inhibition of HIF-Prolyl Hydroxylase. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 1 (2017).
42. Holmes, W. R. Modeling the eect of glutamate diusion and uptake on NMDA and non-NMDA receptor saturation. Biophys J.
69(5), 1734–1747 (1995).
43. Lee, D. W. et al. Signal alterations of glutamate-weighted chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI in lysophosphatidylcholine-
induced demyelination in the rat brain. Brain Res Bull. 164, 334–338 (2020).
44. Lee, D. W. et al. Regional mapping of brain glutamate distributions using glutamate-weighted chemical exchange saturation transfer
imaging. Diagnostics (Basel). 10, 8 (2020).
45. Kim CS, Ding X, Allmeroth K, Biggs LC, Kolenc OI, L’Hoest N, etal. Glutamine metabolism controls stem cell fate reversibility
and long-term maintenance in the hair follicle. Cell Metabolism. 2020.
46. Ali, S. M. & Yosipovitch, G. Skin pH: From basic science to basic skin care. Acta Derm Venereol. 93(3), 261–267 (2013).
47. do Nascimento Pedrosa T, Catarino CM, Pennacchi PC, de Moraes Barros SB, Maria-Engler SS, ,. Skin equivalent models: Protocols
for invitro reconstruction for dermal toxicity evaluation. Methods Mol. Biol. 2240, 31–41 (2021).
48. Hieda DS, Anastacio da Costa Carvalho L, Vaz de Mello B, Oliveira EA, Romano de Assis S, Wu J, etal. Air particulate matter
induces skin barrier dysfunction and water transport alteration on a reconstructed human epidermis model. J Invest Dermatol.
2020;140(12):2343–52.e3.
49. Engel, D. F. et al. Duloxetine protects human neuroblastoma cells from oxidative stress-induced cell death through Akt/Nrf-2/
HO-1 pathway. Neurochem. Res. 43(2), 387–396 (2018).
50. Teplyi, V. & Grebchenko, K. Evaluation of the scars’ vascularization using computer processing of the digital images. Skin Res
Tec hnol. 25(2), 194–199 (2019).
51. Cheng, J. B. et al. Transcriptional programming of normal and inamed human epidermis at single-cell resolution. Cell Rep. 25(4),
871–883 (2018).
52. Joost, S. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals that dierentiation and spatial signatures shape epidermal and hair follicle het-
erogeneity. Cell Syst. 3(3), 221–37.e9 (2016).
53. Jara CP, Carraro RS, Zanesco A, Andrade B, Moreira K, Nogueira G, etal. A smartphone app for individual anesthetic calculation
decreased anesthesia-related mortality in mice. bioRxiv. 2020:2020.09.09.289728.
54. Wang, X., Ge, J., Tredget, E. E. & Wu, Y. e mouse excisional wound splinting model, including applications for stem cell trans-
plantation. Nat. Protoc. 8(2), 302–309 (2013).
55. Aragona, M. et al. Dening stem cell dynamics and migration during wound healing in mouse skin epidermis. Nat. Commun. 8,
14684 (2017).
Acknowledgements
e authors are grateful to Marcio Alves da Cruz, Erika Anne Roman and Gerson Ferraz for technical assistance.
is study was supported, in part, by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil
(CAPES)—Finance Code 88882.434714/2019–01. is work was supported in part by the São Paulo Research
Foundation FAPESP # 2017/04926-6 and # 2019/14527-7.
Author contributions
CPJ: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Investigation, Writing—Original Dra, Writing—Review
& Editing. BAB: Investigation. NFM, DFE and AMZ: Investigation, Writing—Review & Editing. GFS: Meth-
odology, Writing—Review & Editing. LAV: Formal analysis, Writing—Review & Editing, Supervision. EPA:
Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing—Original Dra, Writing—Review &
Editing, Supervision.
Funding
Coordination of Improvement of Higher-Level Personnel of Brazil (CAPES) and São Paulo Research Founda-
tion FAPESP.
Competing interests
e authors declare no competing interests.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scientic Reports | (2021) 11:15453 |
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Additional information
Supplementary Information e online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi. org/
10. 1038/ s41598- 021- 94816-y.
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to C.P.J.
Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional aliations.
Open Access is article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the
Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. e images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/.
© e Author(s) 2021
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Terms and Conditions
Springer Nature journal content, brought to you courtesy of Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH (“Springer Nature”).
Springer Nature supports a reasonable amount of sharing of research papers by authors, subscribers and authorised users (“Users”), for small-
scale personal, non-commercial use provided that all copyright, trade and service marks and other proprietary notices are maintained. By
accessing, sharing, receiving or otherwise using the Springer Nature journal content you agree to these terms of use (“Terms”). For these
purposes, Springer Nature considers academic use (by researchers and students) to be non-commercial.
These Terms are supplementary and will apply in addition to any applicable website terms and conditions, a relevant site licence or a personal
subscription. These Terms will prevail over any conflict or ambiguity with regards to the relevant terms, a site licence or a personal subscription
(to the extent of the conflict or ambiguity only). For Creative Commons-licensed articles, the terms of the Creative Commons license used will
apply.
We collect and use personal data to provide access to the Springer Nature journal content. We may also use these personal data internally within
ResearchGate and Springer Nature and as agreed share it, in an anonymised way, for purposes of tracking, analysis and reporting. We will not
otherwise disclose your personal data outside the ResearchGate or the Springer Nature group of companies unless we have your permission as
detailed in the Privacy Policy.
While Users may use the Springer Nature journal content for small scale, personal non-commercial use, it is important to note that Users may
not:
use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to circumvent access
control;
use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil liability, or is
otherwise unlawful;
falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by Springer Nature in
writing;
use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer Nature journal
content.
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates revenue,
royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain. Springer Nature journal
content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal content on a large scale into their, or any
other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not obligated to publish any information or
content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or without notice. Springer Nature
may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express or implied
with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law,
including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be licensed
from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other manner not
expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at
onlineservice@springernature.com
Content uploaded by Natália Ferreira Mendes
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Natália Ferreira Mendes on Jul 29, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.