SARS-CoV-2 Origins Research Reference Project - 20221130

Abstract

Update#8 - I've uploaded a new version of this file [11/30/22]; the overall count of sources has grown from 1,684 to 1,928, and the number of tabs has increased from 40 to 49.
Update #7 - I've uploaded a new version of this file [9/11/22]; the overall count of sources has grown from 1,368 to 1,684 and the number of tabs has increased from 31 to 40.
Update #6 - I've uploaded a new version of this file [5/14/22]; the overall count of sources has grown from 1,036 to 1,368 and the overall number of tabs has grown from 24 to 31. New tabs include HIV/SARS tied research & in-depth censorship & narrative charts/data.
Update #5 - I've uploaded a new version of this file [1/15/22]; the overall count of sources has grown from 925 to 1,036, and the overall number of tabs has grown from 14 to 24. New tabs include topics like Gain-of-Function, FOIA & other primary source documents, and a list of DRASTIC's major findings & projects.

Update #4 - I've uploaded a new version of this file [10/14]; the overall count of sources has grown from 798 to 925.

Update #3 - I've uploaded a new version of this file [9/15]; the overall count of sources has grown from 703 to 798.

Update #2 - I've uploaded a new version of this file [8/13]; the overall count of sources has grown from 598 to 703. I've also added additional tabs.

Update #1 - This is an update of my ongoing compilation of COVID-19 origin investigation sources, taking the total from 520 to 598. This version will finally sport a DOI. I've recopied the explanation of my purpose and my thesis below, but my intent remains to provide a comprehensive, free compilation of worthwhile references & evidence - that I've read, and that I'm currently using in my work as part of DRASTIC's investigation.

-Rixey

'The arc of inquiry bends towards enlightenment'
In addition to addressing the need for broader access to the ongoing scientific debate concerning the origins of COVID-19, my expectation is that the aggregation and sorting of research will support the following hypothesis:
*The actions taken to curtail scientific research into a non-zoonotic emergence hypothesis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus were based on external considerations, not a dispassionate, scientific review of the available evidence.*
Over time, the arc of inquiry bends towards enlightenment - therefore, the volume of research will tend to shift in the direction of the correct answer as discoveries strengthen or weaken a hypothesis. This should be clearly identifiable by a positive correlation between the volume of research directed towards the ultimately correct hypothesis, and a corresponding decline in the intensity of resources devoted towards less likely conclusions.
***
Furthermore, if that hypothesis is correct, it will provide compelling evidence in support of a larger hypothesis concerning the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic.
The sum of literary & epidemiological evidence will ultimately confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is a product of lab research, rather than zoonotic emergence.