Content uploaded by Nadir Fadhil Habubi
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Nadir Fadhil Habubi on Jul 27, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
PAPER • OPEN ACCESS
Comparative Study of the Structural Properties for Thin and Thick ZnO
Films Deposited on PPC Plastic Substrates
To cite this article: N. N. Jandow et al 2021 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1963 012074
View the article online for updates and enhancements.
This content was downloaded from IP address 91.106.42.241 on 26/07/2021 at 18:09
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
2nd International Conference on Physics and Applied Sciences (ICPAS 2021)
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1963 (2021) 012074
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1963/1/012074
1
Comparative Study of the Structural Properties for Thin and
Thick ZnO Films Deposited on PPC Plastic Substrates
N. N. Jandow1*, A.A. Abbas1, Kh. G. Mohammed1, N. F. Habubi1, F.K. Yam2
1. Department of Physics/ College of Education/ Mustansiriyah University/Baghdad/Iraq.
2. Nano-Optoelectronics Research and Technology Laboratory School of Physics
Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang/Malaysia
email: nidhaljandow@uomustansiriyah.edu.iq
Abstract ZnO films with various thicknesses (0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1 and 1.3 Pm) had been prepared on
PPC plastic bases by using DC sputtering. XRD results showed that all the films displayed
principally ZnO (002) peak at 2T = 34.115o, 34.01, 34.16, 34.07 and 34.12o with FWHM of 0.41o,
0.34, 0.27, 0.21 and 0.368o respectively, which is coincide with wurtzite hexagonal phase,
indicated that films were preferentially grown along c-axis. XRD results also showed that the
lattice constant and the crystallite size for the deposited thin films became larger than those for the
thick film 1.3 Pm; while the stress and microstrain increased for the thick films.
Keywords:Thin Films; PPC Plastic; Physical properties; Structural Properties; Thick Films
1. Introduction
ZnO is belong to the 2nd and 6th groups of periodic table. ZnO has a good sensitivity in the UV
area and high photoconductivity [1]. ZnO has many applications like conducting electrodes, SAV filters,
gas sensors, LED, and laser diodes [2-5].
ZnO thin films was deposited using various methods like DC sputtering technique, RFMS, PLD,
MOCVD, CSP and Sol-Gel, metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy on various inorganic bases such as quartz,
silicon, glass, diamond, NaCl, and InP [6-16]. But, plastic own lightweight and small size in comparison
with inorganic bases [17], and employed in various applications like resilient sensors and curved detector
modes. Plastic bases tool up lighter, more resistant to injury, flexible, and strong devices [18]; these assign
make them appropriate as remote control, and circuits camcorders [19]. The base materials, were
Polycarbonate, Polyarylate , Polyestersulfone , Polyimide , Polyethylene terephthalate, Teflon,
poly(ethylene naphthalate), thermoplastic Perpex, Plexiglas, Polyethylene naphthalate, and cellulose
triacetate. [20].
Poly Propylene Carbonate (PPC), that employed as a base for deposition ZnO thin films, this may turn
on a novel mehtod for the manufacture of cheap optical devices [20].Residual stresses play a
considerable part in mechanical achievement and reliability of thin films. The presence of large residual
stresses results in film buckling or cracking, and even interface delamination like a exemplary telephone-
2nd International Conference on Physics and Applied Sciences (ICPAS 2021)
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1963 (2021) 012074
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1963/1/012074
2
cord peeling [21, 22]. The film is in a stressed state due to a difference in thermal expansion coefficients
between film and base [23].
In this work, thin films with various thicknesses (0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1Pm) and thick ZnO thin film with (1.3
Pm) thickness were grown on PPC plastic substrates using DC sputtering technique. A comparison study
of structural properties of ZnO films dependent on thickness had been carried out. The authors believe that
this comparison of the structural properties between thick and thin films is made for the first time.
2. Experimental work
ZnO films were grown on PPC plastic bases after cleaning by DC sputtering unit . The sputtering
unit operated with a base pressure of about 5x10-5 Torr; target material have a diameter of about 76.2 mm.
Distance between the target and bases was 7 cm.
PPC was subjected to clean procedure before deposition. The target was pre-sputtered for 20 min to take
off any pollution, from target surface. Thickness was evaluated employing surface optical system
Filmetric F20-VIS. Structural properties of films were studied by XRD. Fig.1 shows two deposited films,
at the left with dark brown colored is 1.3Pm thickness and the other is the film with 0.8Pm thickness.
Fig. 1: The deposited films with 1.3Pm and 0.8Pm thicknesses.
3. Results and discussions
Figure 2 offers XRD styles of the deposited ZnO films. All the films offer principally ZnO (002)
peak at 2T = 34.115o, 34.01o, 34.16o, 34.07o and 34.12o with FWHM of 0.41o, 0.34o, 0.27o, 0.21o and
0.368o respectively, that agree with wurtzite hexagonal phase of ZnO. The figure also displays other less
intense peaks assigned to the planes (102) and (110) respectively that emphasize the forming of
polycrystalline ZnO. This result agrees well with Lee et al. [24].
The crystallite size is obtained via Scherrer’s formula [25]:
2nd International Conference on Physics and Applied Sciences (ICPAS 2021)
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1963 (2021) 012074
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1963/1/012074
3
where B is the FWHM , λ is the X-ray wavelength, T is the Bragg diffraction angle [25]. The
results indicate that D increases with increasing film thickness from 0.4 -1 mm, while it decreases for the
thick film with 1.3 nm thickness as shown in fig 3. This means that the thin films have better crystal
quality and larger D than the thick ZnO film. Table 1 summarizes XRD data.
2nd International Conference on Physics and Applied Sciences (ICPAS 2021)
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1963 (2021) 012074
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1963/1/012074
4
Fig. 2 XRD patterns of the grown films
Fig. 3: FWHM and D of the intended films.
The stress (σ) was calculated by using Equation [26].
where c film is the lattice parameter of c axis, and cbulk is the lattice parameter of bulk. The
numerical values of cfilm is calculated by equation 3 [26]:
n
O
= 2dhkl sin
T
(3)
where dhkl is lattice spacing is obtained from the equation [26]:
2nd International Conference on Physics and Applied Sciences (ICPAS 2021)
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1963 (2021) 012074
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1963/1/012074
5
where a and c are lattice constants. The calculated cfilm of ZnO film is 0.5204 nm it is close to the
value from (JCDD) card data for ZnO cbulk 5.2066 Å.
Stress values is found with negative sign indicates that films are compressive stress.
The total stress consists of two components: one, is the intrinsic stress and the second is the extrinsic stress
[27]. In this paper, thickness varies from 0.4 to 1 Pm, thus, the total stress was prevailingly intrinsic.
Since substrate used in this research is plastic and this material bears a certain temperature, for this, the
high temperatures resulting from the long period of film evaporation for 1.3 Pm, led to the curvature of the
substrate, which caused high stress in the deposited film. For this reason, we believe that this film showed
less structural properties quality compared to the other films, also, we can expect that the stress in our
prepared thin films is intrinsic, while in the thick film it can be considered as an extrinsic because of the
long deposition time and the plastic substrate as offer in Fig. (1).
Figure 4 offers the difference of stress with film thickness and Table 1 lists the variance of lattice
parameters, D, σ and ezz with the film thickness.
Fig. 4 : the variation of stress with film thickness.
The strain (ezz) originates principally due to lattice mismatch between film and base can be
calculated from the lattice constant c value in the z-direction using the following equation [27]. Fig. 5
shows the strain against film thickness.
All the films exhibit tensile strain and from Table 1, the compressive stress decreases with
increasing film thickness from 0.4 to 1 Pm, while the sample prepared with the thick thickness (1.3 Pm)
shows an increase in stress, this may be due to the low structural properties as shown from the XRD result.
2nd International Conference on Physics and Applied Sciences (ICPAS 2021)
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1963 (2021) 012074
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1963/1/012074
6
Fig. 5: Strain as a function of film thickness.
The dislocation density was obtained from the equation 6 [28]:
Figure 6 displays the dislocation density against films thickness. As mentioned before, the
crystallite size increased gradually from 20.27 to 38.48 nm with the increase of thicknesses from 0.4 to 1
Pm for the deposited thin films, while it decreased for the deposited thick film to be 12.15 nm. The larger
D and smaller FMHM values mark to better crystallization. δ decreases with increasing thicknesses for
thin films, which may be due to a decrease in the content of lattice imperfections. [28].
Fig. 6: The dislocation density as a function of film thicknesses
2nd International Conference on Physics and Applied Sciences (ICPAS 2021)
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1963 (2021) 012074
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1963/1/012074
7
Table 1: XRD summary of the intended films
From all the obtained results and from the data in Table 1, for the thin films, that strain (ezz) in the
film is tensile, indicating the existence of more relaxed films for higher thickness as shown in Fig 5. As
thickness increases, the amount of ZnO reaching base surface increases to form film and therefore
electrostatic interaction between ZnO particles becomes larger thereby increasing the probability of more
ZnO particles to be gathered together forming a grain. But after one micron, as it’s known that the film
change to a thick film, we notice that the crystallite size decreases, this might be due to heat generated by
the sputtering process in the film of (1.3) micron which affected the order of crystallinity and increases the
compression stress. Fig. 7 shows the comparison between the stress and strain in both the thin and thick
deposited films as a function of thickness. These results are in agreement with Rao et al [27].
Fig. 7: The stress and the strain of the intended films.
Thickness
(μ m)
2θ
(
o
)
Relative
peak
intensity
FWHM
(o
)
Crystallite
size (nm)
d
(nm)
c
film
(nm)
ε
zz
(%)
stress
(σ)
(GPa)
δ
(nm
-
2)
0.4
34.115
1153
0.41
20.270
0.2627
0.5254
0.0979
-
1.2677
0.0024
0.6
34.015
1346
0.34
24.448
0.2622
0.5245
0.0812
-
0.8688
0.00167
0.8
34.165
1624
0.27
30.784
0.2621
0.5243
0.0645
-
0.7892
0.00105
1
34.075
2425
0.21
38.488
0.2620
0.5240
0.0516
-
0.6302
0.00067
1.3
34.125
484
0.68
12.151
0.2629
0.5258
0.1634
-
1.4276
0.00677
2nd International Conference on Physics and Applied Sciences (ICPAS 2021)
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1963 (2021) 012074
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1963/1/012074
8
4. Conclusion
This work was a trial to calculate and compared the stress and strain for thin and thick films,
which was as the authors believe that it is achieved for the first time. It was noticed that the stress and
strain decreased as the thickness of thin film increase, but for a thick film, the situation was reversed. It
can be concluded that ZnO thin films deposited on PPC substrates had better crystalline structure than the
thick one; these results maybe give a good improvement to use a thin film for many applications better
than the thick one.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to Department of Physics/ College of Education/ Mustansiriyah University for
their support and School of Physics /Universiti Sains Malaysia for XRD measurements.
References
[1] Young J S, Ji W L, Chang S J and Su Y K 2006 J. Cryst. Growth 293 43-7
[2] Kumar S, Kim G H, Sreenivas K and Tandon P R 2009 J Electroceram 22 198-202
[3] Lim H J, et al. 2006 Adv. Mater 18 2720-24
[4] Janotti A and Walle G V 2009 Rep. Prog. Phys. 72 126501-30
[5] Bang H K, Hwang K D and Myoung M J 2003 Appl. Surf. Sci. 207 359-64
[6] Mahmood S F, Gould D R, Hassan K A and Salih M H 1995 Thin Solid Films 770 376-9
[7] Auret D F, et al. 2007 Physica B 401-2 378-81
[8] Rao P T, et al. 2010 Physica B 405 2226-31
[9] Jeon Y-S and Kim B-H 2007 Curr. Appl. Phys. 7 421-5
[10] Hickernell S F1976 Proceedings of the IEEE 64 (5) 631-5
[11] Ianno J N, McConville L and Shaikh N 1992 Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 276 59-64
[12] Zhang P B, et al. 2004 Thin Solid Films 449 12-9
[13] Tsai H-Y and Materi J 2007 Process. Technol. 192-3 55-9
[14] Kiriakidis G, et al. 2007 Thin Solid Films 515 8577-81
[15] Q. J. Wang, et al. 2008 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 26 (6) 1848-51
[16] Y. Ma, et al. 2004 J. App. Phys. 95(11) 6268-72
[17] K. J. Suh, et al. 2004 Key Eng. Mat. 270-3 878-83
[18] Nandy S, Goswami S and Chattopadhyay K K 2010 Appl. Surf. Sci. 256 3142-47
[19] Brabec J C, Sariciftci S N and Hummelen C J 2001 Adv. Funct. Mater 11(1)15-26
[20] Jandow N N, et al. 2010 Mater. Lett. 64 2366-68
[21] Freund B L and Suresh S 2004 Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
[22] Lee A, Clemens M B and Nix D W 2004 Acta Mater. 52 2081-93
[23] Janssen M A2007 Thin Solid Films 515 6654-64
[24] Lupan O, Chai G and Chow L 2008 Micr. Eng. 85 (11) 2220-25
[25] Jandow N N, Abu Hassan H, Yam K F and Ibrahim K 2012 J Mater Sci. 471972-76
[26] Cheng X W, et al. 2009 J. Phys.: Conference Series 152 012036 1-6
[27] Rao P T, Kumar S M, Angayarkanni A S and Ashok M 2009 J. Alloy. Comp. 485 413-17
[28] Nagarani N and Vasu V 2013 J. Phot. Spint.2(2) 19-21