ArticlePublisher preview available

Reappraising Stress Arousal Improves Affective, Neuroendocrine, and Academic Performance Outcomes in Community College Classrooms

American Psychological Association
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

The field experiment presented here applied a stress regulation technique to optimize affective and neuroendocrine responses and improve academic and psychological outcomes in an evaluative academic context. Community college students (N = 339) were randomly assigned to stress reappraisal or active control conditions immediately before taking their second in-class exam. Whereas stress is typically perceived as having negative effects, stress reappraisal informs individuals about the functional benefits of stress and is hypothesized to reduce threat appraisals, and subsequently, improve downstream outcomes. Multilevel models indicated that compared with controls, reappraising stress led to less math evaluation anxiety, lower threat appraisals, more adaptive neuroendocrine responses (lower cortisol and higher testosterone levels on testing days relative to baseline), and higher scores on Exam 2 and on a subsequent Exam 3. Reappraisal students also persisted in their courses at a higher rate than controls. Targeted mediation models suggested stress appraisals partially mediated effects of reappraisal. Notably, procrastination and performance approach goals (measured between exams) partially mediated lagged effects of reappraisal on subsequent performance. Implications for the stress, emotion regulation, and mindsets literatures are discussed. Moreover, alleviating negative effects of acute stress in community college students, a substantial but understudied population, has potentially important applied implications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Reappraising Stress Arousal Improves Affective, Neuroendocrine, and
Academic Performance Outcomes in Community College Classrooms
Jeremy P. Jamieson
1
, Alexandra E. Black
1
, Libbey E. Pelaia
2
, Hannah Gravelding
1
,
Jonathan Gordils
1
, and Harry T. Reis
1
1
Department of Psychology, University of Rochester
2
Department of Mathematics, Cuyahoga Community College
The eld experiment presented here applied a stress regulation technique to optimize affective and neu-
roendocrine responses and improve academic and psychological outcomes in an evaluative academic
context. Community college students (N= 339) were randomly assigned to stress reappraisal or active
control conditions immediately before taking their second in-class exam. Whereas stress is typically per-
ceived as having negative effects, stress reappraisal informs individuals about the functional benets of
stress and is hypothesized to reduce threat appraisals, and subsequently, improve downstream outcomes.
Multilevel models indicated that compared with controls, reappraising stress led to less math evaluation
anxiety, lower threat appraisals, more adaptive neuroendocrine responses (lower cortisol and higher tes-
tosterone levels on testing days relative to baseline), and higher scores on Exam 2 and on a subsequent
Exam 3. Reappraisal students also persisted in their courses at a higher rate than controls. Targeted
mediation models suggested stress appraisals partially mediated effects of reappraisal. Notably, procras-
tination and performance approach goals (measured between exams) partially mediated lagged effects
of reappraisal on subsequent performance. Implications for the stress, emotion regulation, and mindsets
literatures are discussed. Moreover, alleviating negative effects of acute stress in community college stu-
dents, a substantial but understudied population, has potentially important applied implications.
Keywords: stress, reappraisal, challenge and threat, psychophysiology, community college
Supplemental materials: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000893.supp
Whether you think you can, or you canteither way, youre
right.Henry Ford
Supporting prociency in science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics (STEM) is important for addressing 21st century
demands. STEM vocations are growing at faster rates with lower
unemployment and greater earning potential than non-STEM
vocations (Carnevale et al., 2013;Fayer et al., 2017). Employment
in STEM vocations, though, requires STEM training, especially
at the postsecondary level. Postsecondary STEM education,
however, has traditionally underrepresented individuals from
low-income and/or stigmatized groups, creating a skills gapin
American society (White & Shakibnia, 2019). Community col-
lege systems, which are affordable 2-year programs in the United
States that provide open access to postsecondary education, offer
a promising and powerful mechanism for reducing skills gaps by
preparing students for 4-year university programs and providing
workforce developmentthat is, helping people maintain/
upgrade professional skills and meet/maintain licensure require-
ments (Lowry & Thomas-Anderson, 2017).
Supporting STEM achievement is particularly important for
underserved populations in the educational pipeline, such as com-
munity college students. Although community college students
comprise a large proportion (42%) of U.S. postsecondary students
(Ma & Baum, 2016) there remains a lack of research on this
group, which is especially notable because community college stu-
dents are disproportionately members of underrepresented groups
(Carnevale et al., 2018). Moreover, community colleges often
serve as the last stopin the educational system for students. If
students do not pass community college courses and matriculate to
4-year programs, their vocational options and lifetime earnings
potential are hamstrung (Autor et al., 2008;Webber, 2016). Thus,
This article was published Online First July 22, 2021.
Jeremy P. Jamieson https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3790-8747
Jonathan Gordils is now at Department of Psychology, University of
Hartford.
Data for this research were collected as part of a larger project funded by
the U.S. Department of Education (R305A150036) awarded to Jeremy P.
Jamieson and Harry T. Reis. We thank Tracy Boykins for her invaluable
help recruiting classrooms and overseeing data collection procedures at one
of the campuses, Aaron Altose for recruiting classrooms and his help
developing manipulation materials, the Carnegie Foundation for the
Advancement of Teaching for their help developing materials, as well as
the many research assistants in the Social Stress Lab at Rochester for their
help organizing data into electronic summary les.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jeremy P.
Jamieson, Department of Psychology, University of Rochester, Meliora
Hall, P.O. Box 270266, Rochester, NY 14627, United States. Email:
jeremy.jamieson@rochester.edu
197
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
©2021 American Psychological Association 2022, Vol. 151, No. 1, 197212
ISSN: 0096-3445 https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000893
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
... For instance, an accelerated heartbeat can be reappraised as the body preparing for difficult situations by delivering additional oxygen. Research suggests that SAR may reduce sC reactivity (Jamieson et al., 2022) and enhance sAA reactivity (Beltzer et al., 2014;Jamieson et al., 2010) in motivated performance situations. ...
... The content of the SAR intervention was structured according to previously used SAR materials (Beltzer et al., 2014;Jamieson et al., 2022Jamieson et al., , 2012. Participants watched a 7-min screencast explaining the functionality of bodily stress responses (e.g., faster breathing as a sign of additional oxygen intake) and their evolutionary purpose. ...
Article
Full-text available
Breaking bad news (BBN; i.e., the disclosure of a serious diagnosis) is a necessary but challenging task in the medical field, often raising stress levels among physicians. According to the biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat, stress responses can manifest as adaptive challenge states or maladaptive threat states. Prior research has proposed that specific patterns in neuroendocrine responses may signal challenge and threat. In this study, we employed a 2 × 2 design to examine the effects of stress arousal reappraisal (SAR; i.e., reframing bodily arousal as a functional response) and worked example (WE; i.e., stepwise demonstration of BBN) interventions on salivary cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone, and alpha-amylase responses. A total of 229 third-year medical students participated in a BBN simulation. While significant activation (rise) and regulation (decline) of neuroendocrine markers were observed in response to the BBN encounter, neither the SAR nor the WE intervention affected their peak levels or the magnitude (area under the curve) of the response. Only the WE intervention decelerated the rise and decline in dehydroepiandrosterone levels around individual peaks, potentially indicating an attenuated stress response. These findings suggest that neither of the interventions induced the expected challenge pattern in neuroendocrine activity. However, due to the low temporal resolution of salivary measurements and the dynamic process of challenge and threat orientations, we propose that the neuroendocrine responses may have limitations in distinguishing between challenge and threat.
... However, some associations become nonsignificant when considering the effects of demographics and other stress-related factors. Previous research has indicated that academic-related emotional and behavioral outcomes (e.g., burnout, anxiety, and procrastination) were associated with several stress-related factors, such as academic stress levels (e.g., Fariborz et al., 2019), appraisals of academic stress (e.g., Jamieson et al., 2022), and coping strategies for academic stress (e.g., Teixeira et al., 2022). While it might be argued that the academic stress mindset is similar to these vari-ables, it is theoretically distinct from them. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study explores the structure of stress mindsets within academic contexts and examines their associations with academic-related emotional (academic anxiety, school burnout) and behavioral (self-handicapping, proactive, and challenge-seeking behaviors) outcomes among Chinese adolescent students. Results supported a two-factor model of academic stress mindsets, distinguishing between the stress-is-enhancing (SIE) and stress-is-debilitating (SID) mindsets as related yet distinct constructs. Notably, these mindsets differentially predicted academic outcomes after controlling for demographics and other stress-related factors. Specifically, the academic SIE mindset was more associated with adaptive learning outcomes (i.e., proactive behaviors), while the academic SID mindset was more predictive of maladaptive learning outcomes (i.e., academic anxiety, school burnout, and self-handicapping behaviors). These findings extend stress mindset theory to academic settings and underscore the need to consider specific contexts when investigating stress mindsets. Future interventions designed to change students’ learning states should focus on enhancing their academic SIE mindset while simultaneously reducing their academic SID mindset.
... As such, while the results offer an interesting account that suppression may be adaptive as a means to reduce aggression, further support is needed to substantiate this interpretation. One such approach would be to compare other emotion regulation strategies (e.g., Jamieson et al., 2022) to isolate the unique utility of suppression. Furthermore, although we propose several mechanisms, other factors inherent to disagreements warrant consideration. ...
Article
Full-text available
Disagreements over conflicting viewpoints are common and have important implications for social relationships and overall well-being. A large corpus of research from the political and social sciences documents the myriad negative consequences of disclosing dissenting viewpoints. However, relatively less is known about how sharing (and encountering) opposing viewpoints impacts real-time affective, physiological, and behavioral processes. Toward this end, this research manipulated the beliefs, values, and opinions held by an opposing other in a novel dyadic context to (a) examine ongoing processes during interpersonal disagreements and (b) establish an immersive paradigm to experimentally study interpersonal disagreement (vs. agreement). Participants (N = 193) engaged in a topic discussion task with (ostensibly) an unacquainted participant who was, in fact, a confederate trained to either (a) agree with the participant’s stance on the topic (i.e., agree condition, n = 95) or (b) disagree with the participant’s stance on the topic (i.e., disagree condition, n = 98). Results demonstrate that participants assigned to interact in the disagree condition reported more negative affect, exhibited greater cardiac output and a shorter preejection period (i.e., a profile consistent with anger), displayed more negative affect (anger and anxiety), and formed more negative attributions of their partner, compared to participants assigned to the agree condition. Then, exploratory analyses indicated that when participants experienced and displayed more anger, they were more likely to aggress against their interaction partner. Implications for theory development and interpersonal dynamics are discussed.
... For instance, CAT states exhibit differential patterns of motivational orientation, much like other affective states (e.g., anxiety and avoidance or anger and approach; Blascovich, 2008). In performance situations, a challenge state is generally associated with approach motivation and a threat state with avoidance motivation (e.g., Behnke et al., 2022;Jamieson and Mendes, 2016;Jamieson et al., 2014Jamieson et al., , 2022. Moreover, whereas a challenge state is typically associated with positive behavioral and performance outcomes (see Behnke and Kaczmarek, 2018;Hase et al., 2019c, for reviews), a threat state often impairs decision-making in the short-term and in the long-term is associated with accelerated "brain aging," cognitive decline, poorer mental health (e.g., more symptoms of anxiety and depression) and cardiovascular disease (Jefferson et al., 2010;McLoughlin et al., 2024;Matthews et al., 1997;Yeager et al., 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
The biopsychosocial model (BPSM) of challenge and threat provides a framework for understanding stress responses in motivated performance situations, including how stress relates to performance. In this model, experiences of challenge—characterized by evaluations of personal coping resources matching or exceeding situational demands—elicit approach-oriented patterns of physiological responding and tend to facilitate performance, whereas threat—characterized by demands exceeding resources—elicit avoidance-oriented patterns of physiological responding and tend to impair performance. Extant systematic reviews and meta-analyses support the idea that challenge facilitates performance relative to threat (Behnke & Kaczmarek, 2018; Hase et al., 2019). The present systematic review and meta-analysis builds on this evidence base by examining whether conclusions replicate in recent research (post-2017), which is important given seismic cultural shifts tied to a worldwide pandemic, civil unrest, and skyrocketing mental health problems tied to stress. The analysis included 62 studies published between 2017 and 2024 (total N = 7,418 participants). The meta-analytic findings indicate that individuals in a challenge state achieve better performance outcomes than those in a threat state across multiple domains (e.g., education, sport). While effect sizes were small, the risk of bias was generally low. These results reaffirm the utility of the BPSM and emphasize the importance of stress responses in influencing performance outcomes. These data also have the potential to inform future research on this topic by shedding light on expectable effect sizes and highlighting potential influences of publication bias and replicability issues.
... Consequently, many stress management techniques primarily focus on downregulating, reducing, or ignoring stress reactions altogether 39 . In contrast, SAR interventions emphasize the advantageous aspects of stress by educating individuals on the functionality of physiological arousal, framing it as beneficial for successful task performance (e.g., [40][41][42][43]. For instance, rather than perceiving a fast and strong heartbeat as debilitating, individuals are encouraged to view it as a source of additional oxygen supply, enhancing performance in demanding situations. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Breaking bad news (BBN) is among the most distressing communication tasks in the medical field, wherein physicians disclose serious diagnoses to their patients. Under stress, physicians may resort to maladaptive communication behaviors, potentially affecting patients health in the long-term. Therefore, it is essential to support medical professionals in effectively managing their stress responses early in their careers. Using the biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat as theoretical framework, we employed a 2 x 2 study design to examine the effects of stress arousal reappraisal (SAR; i.e., reinterpretation of bodily changes as functional coping resources) and worked example (WE; i.e., step-by-step demonstration of how to BBN) interventions on demand and resource appraisals and cardiovascular responses of 229 medical students engaged in simulated BBN encounters. Participants who prepared with WE reported more coping resources relative to demands after the BBN encounter than participants not preparing with WE. Participants receiving SAR instructions exhibited improved cardiovascular responses during the BBN task, indicated by increased cardiac output and decreased total peripheral resistance, than participants not receiving SAR instructions. These findings align with the notion that both interventions facilitate a shift from a threat to a challenge state, supporting their potential for integration into BBN training.
Article
Full-text available
This pilot study explored the combined impact of an arousal reappraisal intervention, shown previously to enable individuals to hold a more constructive interpretation of physiological arousal, and a single session of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), demonstrated to increase the efficacy of psychological interventions, on measures of state anxiety, challenge and threat appraisals, and action performance under a high pressure esport context. Following a fully repeated measures study design, seventeen male Counter-Strike competitors received four different experimental interventions: tDCS with arousal reappraisal, tDCS with active control, sham stimulation with arousal reappraisal, and sham stimulation with active control. The findings tentatively suggest that arousal reappraisal effectively reduces cognitive anxiety, promotes favourable challenge appraisals versus threat, and enhances esports performance. This effect is more pronounced when combined with anodal tDCS. Combining arousal reappraisal and tDCS may be a promising intervention for esports competitors facing performance pressure.
Article
Anxiety is highly prevalent among adults. Evidence suggests that perceived stress controllability and emotional growth mindsets are associated with decreased anxiety. However, whether these positive factors synergistically contribute to reducing the impact of stress on anxiety remains unclear, especially within everyday stress contexts. Multilevel models were used to investigate how perceived stress controllability and emotional growth mindsets interacted to mitigate the adverse impact of daily stress on anxiety, differentiating within- and between-person effects. Overall, 198 participants completed ecological momentary assessments of perceived stress intensity and controllability, emotional growth mindsets, and anxiety four times daily over 10–12 consecutive days. The within-person analyses showed that high emotional growth mindsets buffer the link between perceived stress intensity and anxiety. More importantly, the between-person and cross-level results suggested that the synergistic effect of emotional growth mindsets and perceived stress controllability maximally buffered the correlation between perceived stress intensity and anxiety. Additionally, these results highlighted that the positive association between perceived stress intensity and anxiety was most pronounced among participants with low emotional growth mindsets and perceived stress controllability. These findings further support a synergistic intervention approach that emphasizes anxiety alleviation through enhanced perceived stress controllability and the development of emotional growth mindsets.
Article
Full-text available
Individuals embody various social identities that can impact how they interface with the social environment. Stigma theories suggest that members of low-status or marginalized groups possess devalued social identities, and therefore, experience more stress. While social identities can lead to increased stress, individuals’ appraisals of their identities are not necessarily perceived as harmful/demanding. Rather, social identities can also be appraised as resources or sources of strength bringing opportunities and facilitating goal attainment. Using the biopsychosocial (BPS) model of challenge and threat as a conceptual foundation, this research developed a novel measure to assess individuals’ appraisals of their social identities. In Study 1 (N = 575), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated the theorized factor structure (i.e., resource and demand appraisals) and assessed the overall fit of the model. Structural equation modeling (SEM) tested for associations between the resource and demand latent factors. Individuals appraising their ethnic-racial identity as a resource exhibited improved self and intergroup outcomes, while those perceiving it as a demand reported worse self-based and intergroup outcomes, as well as more distress. Study 2 (N = 743 Black and White Americans), which was preregistered, examined group differences in appraisals of ethnic-racial identity. SEM revealed that Black participants were more likely than White participants to appraise their ethnic-racial identity as demanding, leading to worse social and intergroup outcomes. Even when Black participants perceived their ethnic-racial identity as a resource, they still reported higher levels of discrimination, intergroup anxiety, and behavioral avoidance compared to their White counterparts. Implications for theory development and application to the stress literature are discussed.
Article
Anxiety symptoms are among the most prevalent mental health disorders in adolescents, highlighting the need for scalable and accessible interventions. As anxiety often co-occurs with perceived stress during adolescence, stress interventions may offer a promising approach to reducing anxiety. Previous stress interventions have largely focused on the view that stress is harmful, aiming to manage and mitigate its negative effects. Stress optimization presents a novel intervention perspective, suggesting that stress can also lead to positive outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether stress optimization can effectively reduce anxiety symptoms in adolescents. We developed a single-session stress optimization intervention and investigated the conditions under which it was most effective. A large-scale randomized controlled trial was conducted (N = 1779, aged 12–18 years), with participants reporting their perceived stress, stress mindset, and anxiety over a two-month follow-up period. Machine learning is a promising approach for assessing personalized intervention effects. Conservative Bayesian causal forest analysis was employed to detect both treatment and heterogeneous intervention effects. The findings revealed that the intervention effectively reduced anxiety symptoms in the school context over a two-month follow-up (0.87 posterior probability). Furthermore, adolescents with higher anxiety and perceived stress at baseline experienced the most significant reductions in anxiety outcomes (standard deviations of −0.18 and −0.11 respectively). The single-session stress optimization intervention demonstrated potential for cost-effective scaling.
Article
Full-text available
From W. B. Cannon’s identification of adrenaline with “fight or flight” to modern views of stress, negative views of peripheral physiological arousal predominate. Sympathetic nervous system (SNS) arousal is associated with anxiety, neuroticism, the Type A personality, cardiovascular disease, and immune system suppression; illness susceptibility is associated with life events requiring adjustments. “Stress control” has become almost synonymous with arousal reduction. A contrary positive view of peripheral arousal follows from studies of subjects exposed to intermittent stressors. Such exposure leads to low SNS arousal base rates, but to strong and responsive challenge- or stress-induced SNS-adrenal-medullary arousal, with resistance to brain catecholamine depletion and with suppression of pituitary adrenal-cortical responses. That pattern of arousal defines physiological toughness and, in interaction with psychological coping, corresponds with positive performance in even complex tasks, with emotional stability, and with immune system enhancement. The toughness concept suggests an opposition between effective short- and long-term coping, with implications for effective therapies and stress-inoculating life-styles.
Article
Full-text available
We developed a multidimensional coping inventory to assess the different ways in which people respond to stress. Five scales (of four items each) measure conceptually distinct aspects of problem-focused coping (active coping, planning, suppression of competing activities, restraint coping, seeking of instrumental social support); five scales measure aspects of what might be viewed as emotion-focused coping (seeking of emotional social support, positive reinterpretation, acceptance, denial, turning to religion); and three scales measure coping responses that arguably are less useful (focus on and venting of emotions, behavioral disengagement, mental disengagement). Study 1 reports the development of scale items. Study 2 reports correlations between the various coping scales and several theoretically relevant personality measures in an effort to provide preliminary information about the inventory's convergent and discriminant validity. Study 3 uses the inventory to assess coping responses among a group of undergraduates who were attempting to cope with a specific stressful episode. This study also allowed an initial examination of associations between dispositional and situational coping tendencies.
Article
Full-text available
Mathematics anxiety is a major impediment to achievement in mathematics and science academic domains. Although important steps have been made in understanding the psychological processes of mathematics anxiety, as well as developing promising interventions, less is known about the relationship among mathematics anxiety, affective and biological responses, and achievement in stressful performance contexts. Toward this end, the research presented here recruited community college students (N = 478) from 30 mathematics classrooms, and examined associations among mathematics anxiety, stress appraisals, neuroendocrine reactivity (cortisol and testosterone), and exam scores. Higher levels of mathematics anxiety associated with students perceiving more demand and fewer coping resources in exam settings, lower levels of testosterone on exam days relative to baseline, and worse exam performance. Moreover, associations among mathematics anxiety, and neuroendocrine reactivity and performance were partially mediated by stress appraisals. Implications for student achievement, wellbeing, and intervention development are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
The current research examined the interpersonal dynamics of emotion regulation in a stressful collaborative context. Little is known about how regulating one's own stress responses impacts teammates. In this article, we propose that individual efforts to regulate emotions can impact teammates for the better. We tested hypotheses arising from this claim using a dyadic experiment (N = 266) that assessed in vivo physiological stress responses during collaborative work (a face-to-face product design task) and then individual work (a product pitch to evaluators). Throughout the experiment, the manipulated teammate was randomly assigned to reappraise their stress arousal, suppress their emotional displays, or receive no instructions. The nonmanipulated teammate received no instructions in all experimental conditions. Stress reappraisal benefited both teammates, eliciting challenge-like physiological responses (higher cardiac output, lower total peripheral resistance) relative to the suppression and control conditions. These effects were observed during both collaborative and individual work. A mediation model suggested that face-to-face interpersonal effects of stress reappraisal fed forward to promote nonmanipulated teammates' improved stress responses during individual performance. Moreover, manipulated teammates' displays of positive and negative affect emerged as potential mechanisms for improvements in nonmanipulated teammates' stress responses in moderation analyses. Thus, participants benefited by interacting with a person who reappraised their stress as functional. This work has theoretical implications for the interpersonal dynamics of emotion regulation, and relevance for applied settings is also discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
Could mitigating persistent worries about belonging in the transition to college improve adult life for black Americans? To examine this question, we conducted a long-term follow-up of a randomized social-belonging intervention delivered in the first year of college. This 1-hour exercise represented social and academic adversity early in college as common and temporary. As previously reported in Science , the exercise improved black students’ grades and well-being in college. The present study assessed the adult outcomes of these same participants. Examining adult life at an average age of 27, black adults who had received the treatment (versus control) exercise 7 to 11 years earlier reported significantly greater career satisfaction and success, psychological well-being, and community involvement and leadership. Gains were statistically mediated by greater college mentorship. The results suggest that addressing persistent social-psychological concerns via psychological intervention can shape the life course, partly by changing people’s social realities.
Article
Full-text available
Background Maladaptive stress reactivity is a vulnerability factor for the recurrence of mood and anxiety episodes. Since appraisals of situational demand and available resources to cope with a stressor drive stress reactivity, they are meaningful targets for intervention. In the present study, we test whether exercise (EX) can facilitate learning arousal reappraisal (AR) techniques among individuals vulnerable to depressive episodes and thereby improve reactivity to stressful events. Methods Participants (N = 167) with mild-to-moderate symptoms of depression were randomly assigned to inactive control (CTRL), EX (three 5-min bouts at varying intensity), AR instruction, or their combination (EX+AR) prior to undergoing a stressor. Stress appraisal (pre- and post-stressor) and perceived stress (pre-, post-, 5-, 10-, and 15-min post-stressor) were assessed. Results The EX+AR condition reported a more adaptive appraisal of the stressor and exhibited a greater decline in perceived stress immediately and 15-min post the stressor compared to EX and CTRL conditions. The AR condition also reported a more adaptive appraisal of the stressor and exhibited a greater decline in perceived stress but only 15-min after the stressor and only in comparison to the CTRL condition. There were no significant differences between the EX+AR and AR conditions nor between the EX and CTRL conditions. Conclusions Results provide no clear evidence for a synergistic effect for EX+AR and highlights that AR instruction aids adaptive reappraisal of stress. Studies with longitudinal designs are needed. These observations add to the body of literature exploring mechanisms for improving stress reactivity and the role exercise may play.
Article
Full-text available
The dominant cultural valuation of stress is that it is “bad for me.” This valuation leads to regulatory goals of reducing or avoiding stress. In this article, we propose an alternative approach—stress optimization—which integrates theory and research on stress mindset (e.g., Crum, Salovey, & Achor, 2013) and stress reappraisal (e.g., Jamieson, Mendes, Blackstock, & Schmader, 2010) interventions. We further integrate these theories with the extended process model of emotion regulation (Gross, 2015). In so doing, we explain how altering second-level valuation systems—shifting the valuation of stress from “is bad for me” to “can be good for me”—fundamentally changes the overarching goal of stress regulation from reducing stress to optimizing stress responses to achieve valued goals. With this optimization goal in mind, individuals are invited to flexibly identify, select, and engage in specific regulation tactics (e.g., situation selection, attentional control, cognitive change, and response modulation) in ways that help them achieve valued ends as opposed to merely reducing or avoiding stressful experiences. We discuss definitions and issues related to key terms including stress, stressors, stress responses, and stress regulation and outline a research agenda for testing this new integrated theory as an intervention.
Article
Full-text available
Mindsets can impact an individual’s performance in stressful experiences such as public speaking or receiving negative feedback. Yet we know little about the boundary conditions of where these mindsets predict success, and where they may become irrelevant or even maladaptive. The current research asks whether mindsets are beneficial in environments of extreme physical and mental stress using participants undergoing the notoriously challenging Navy SEALs training. We hypothesized that participants with stress-is-enhancing mindsets – who believe stress enhances their health, performance and wellbeing – will outperform those with stress-is-debilitating mindsets. In addition, we explore whether other mindsets about willpower and failure predict success in a similar manner. Following 174 Navy SEALs candidates, we find that, even in this extreme setting, stress-is-enhancing mindsets predict greater persistence through training, faster obstacle course times, and fewer negative evaluations from peers and instructors. We also find evidence that failure-is-enhancing mindsets may be detrimental to candidates’ success, and non-limited willpower mindsets prompt negative evaluations from others. Multiverse analyses were conducted to test for the robustness of these effects across researcher analytical decisions, which produced consistent results. We discuss how findings in this unique environment can provide insight into the importance of mindsets in other organizations and propose future avenues of research to further understand the causal role of mindsets in diverse workplace contexts.
Article
Full-text available
A global priority for the behavioural sciences is to develop cost-effective, scalable interventions that could improve the academic outcomes of adolescents at a population level, but no such interventions have so far been evaluated in a population-generalizable sample. Here we show that a short (less than one hour), online growth mindset intervention—which teaches that intellectual abilities can be developed—improved grades among lower-achieving students and increased overall enrolment to advanced mathematics courses in a nationally representative sample of students in secondary education in the United States. Notably, the study identified school contexts that sustained the effects of the growth mindset intervention: the intervention changed grades when peer norms aligned with the messages of the intervention. Confidence in the conclusions of this study comes from independent data collection and processing, pre-registration of analyses, and corroboration of results by a blinded Bayesian analysis.