A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Reappraising Stress Arousal Improves Affective, Neuroendocrine, and
Academic Performance Outcomes in Community College Classrooms
Jeremy P. Jamieson
1
, Alexandra E. Black
1
, Libbey E. Pelaia
2
, Hannah Gravelding
1
,
Jonathan Gordils
1
, and Harry T. Reis
1
1
Department of Psychology, University of Rochester
2
Department of Mathematics, Cuyahoga Community College
The field experiment presented here applied a stress regulation technique to optimize affective and neu-
roendocrine responses and improve academic and psychological outcomes in an evaluative academic
context. Community college students (N= 339) were randomly assigned to stress reappraisal or active
control conditions immediately before taking their second in-class exam. Whereas stress is typically per-
ceived as having negative effects, stress reappraisal informs individuals about the functional benefits of
stress and is hypothesized to reduce threat appraisals, and subsequently, improve downstream outcomes.
Multilevel models indicated that compared with controls, reappraising stress led to less math evaluation
anxiety, lower threat appraisals, more adaptive neuroendocrine responses (lower cortisol and higher tes-
tosterone levels on testing days relative to baseline), and higher scores on Exam 2 and on a subsequent
Exam 3. Reappraisal students also persisted in their courses at a higher rate than controls. Targeted
mediation models suggested stress appraisals partially mediated effects of reappraisal. Notably, procras-
tination and performance approach goals (measured between exams) partially mediated lagged effects
of reappraisal on subsequent performance. Implications for the stress, emotion regulation, and mindsets
literatures are discussed. Moreover, alleviating negative effects of acute stress in community college stu-
dents, a substantial but understudied population, has potentially important applied implications.
Keywords: stress, reappraisal, challenge and threat, psychophysiology, community college
Supplemental materials: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000893.supp
Whether you think you can, or you can’t—either way, you’re
right.—Henry Ford
Supporting proficiency in science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics (STEM) is important for addressing 21st century
demands. STEM vocations are growing at faster rates with lower
unemployment and greater earning potential than non-STEM
vocations (Carnevale et al., 2013;Fayer et al., 2017). Employment
in STEM vocations, though, requires STEM training, especially
at the postsecondary level. Postsecondary STEM education,
however, has traditionally underrepresented individuals from
low-income and/or stigmatized groups, creating a “skills gap”in
American society (White & Shakibnia, 2019). Community col-
lege systems, which are affordable 2-year programs in the United
States that provide open access to postsecondary education, offer
a promising and powerful mechanism for reducing skills gaps by
preparing students for 4-year university programs and providing
workforce development—that is, helping people maintain/
upgrade professional skills and meet/maintain licensure require-
ments (Lowry & Thomas-Anderson, 2017).
Supporting STEM achievement is particularly important for
underserved populations in the educational pipeline, such as com-
munity college students. Although community college students
comprise a large proportion (42%) of U.S. postsecondary students
(Ma & Baum, 2016) there remains a lack of research on this
group, which is especially notable because community college stu-
dents are disproportionately members of underrepresented groups
(Carnevale et al., 2018). Moreover, community colleges often
serve as the “last stop”in the educational system for students. If
students do not pass community college courses and matriculate to
4-year programs, their vocational options and lifetime earnings
potential are hamstrung (Autor et al., 2008;Webber, 2016). Thus,
This article was published Online First July 22, 2021.
Jeremy P. Jamieson https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3790-8747
Jonathan Gordils is now at Department of Psychology, University of
Hartford.
Data for this research were collected as part of a larger project funded by
the U.S. Department of Education (R305A150036) awarded to Jeremy P.
Jamieson and Harry T. Reis. We thank Tracy Boykins for her invaluable
help recruiting classrooms and overseeing data collection procedures at one
of the campuses, Aaron Altose for recruiting classrooms and his help
developing manipulation materials, the Carnegie Foundation for the
Advancement of Teaching for their help developing materials, as well as
the many research assistants in the Social Stress Lab at Rochester for their
help organizing data into electronic summary files.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jeremy P.
Jamieson, Department of Psychology, University of Rochester, Meliora
Hall, P.O. Box 270266, Rochester, NY 14627, United States. Email:
jeremy.jamieson@rochester.edu
197
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
©2021 American Psychological Association 2022, Vol. 151, No. 1, 197–212
ISSN: 0096-3445 https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000893
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.