BookPDF Available

Archaeological Remote Sensing in the 21st Century: (Re)Defining Practice and Theory


Abstract and Figures

Despite the many (r)evolutions in remote sensing technology over the past three decades, integration in archaeological practice and theory has sometimes been limited by reliance on practice and theory imported from other disciplines, without questioning or deep understanding. This collection of papers aims to contribute to the exploration of developing practice and theory in remote sensing archaeology for the 21st century. The scope of this volume is the use of remotely sensed data from either air- or spaceborne platforms for the benefit of archaeology and cultural heritage in general, with a specific focus on better defining the roles and contexts that detail why archaeologists may apply remote sensing techniques. With this focus, it is our hope that remotely sensed data will be better and more intrinsically integrated into the symbiosis of archaeological practice and theory. The editorial for this volume suggests that many aspects of archaeological practice can be characterised as ‘beg, borrow and steal’. This collection provides the reader with thoughtful papers that contribute to the development of archaeological remote sensing as a mature interdisciplinary field characterised by explicit and theoretically engaged approaches to understanding the past.
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
... Beck et al., 2007;Lasaponara & Masini, 2008;Cowley, 2011). Its growing importance in the last decade is reflected in publications by leading specialists in archaeological remote sensing that demonstrate broad ranges of applications and also open up new directions (Tapete, 2018a;Verhoeven et al., 2021). Among many factors, its increasing role is attributed to the technological development of sensors for data capture and the accessibility of new remote sensing and Earth Observation data (Tapete, 2018b). ...
... We attempted to select a few well-documented archaeological sites that were recently reported as being affected either by natural or cultural threats. Using established methods of satellite data processing or an approach to available data characterized as "beg, borrow and steal" to use a phrase from Cowley et al. (2021), we aimed to estimate the impact of such events on archaeological structures. We assumed that starting from known, well-recognized and documented cases will help establish potential and limitations of Sentinel-2 dataset. ...
Full-text available
This article aims to demonstrate the potential of Sentinel-2 and GIS for heritage monitoring, protection, and management. Applications of remote sensing in heritage strategies have been explored for decades. However, new possibilities were opened up with the launch of the European Union's Earth Observation Programme Copernicus. Systematic and frequent global coverage of land surface offered by one of its products-Sentinel-2 provides an almost instant insight into sudden events and long-term processes that affect heritage around the world. Following new developments in remote sensing, GIS provides tools to integrate data for their effective processing, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination of results. We will explore the potential and limitations of those datasets and tools using UNESCO World Heritage sites from Sudan as case studies. In particular, we will tackle issues related to the interpretation of changes around heritage sites, attempt to estimate their recent conditions, and identify existing and/ or potential threats.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.