ArticlePDF Available

R2Cross: A Web‐Based Decision Support Tool for Instream Flows

Authors:

Abstract

The determination of instream flows for preserving or improving aquatic ecosystems’ health often includes challenges caused by varied hydraulic conditions, ecological criteria, and socioeconomic considerations. Despite the abundance of available methodologies, there are few available desktop or online applications enabling rapid assessment of instream flows that incorporate pertinent geospatial information for the region. We present R2Cross, a user‐friendly, online, instream flow rate calculation tool that was developed for aiding water allocation decisions in the state of Colorado. The R2Cross tool is the only existing online decision support tool based on a hydraulic rating method. It estimates hydraulic conditions at different water stages in a stream reach and compares them to habitat criteria to determine biological instream flow recommendations. Cloud‐based Geographic Information System features and additional tools are incorporated that augment information and aid in evaluating ecological needs. The development of the R2Cross tool enables an open‐access interface for management authorities and stakeholders to evaluate ecological needs at stream reaches. It automates the reporting process and could assist in making water management decisions about environmental protection. Although the R2Cross tool was developed for the state of Colorado, it is generalizable to other stream systems assuming similar habitat criteria.
R2Cross: A Web-Based Decision Support Tool for Instream Flows
Panagiotis D. Oikonomou , Rumpal Sidhu, Tyler Wible, and Ryan R. Morrison
Research Impact Statement: R2Cross is an intuitive and robust web-accessible tool for assessing instream
flow criteria. It fills a gap in publicly available online tools as it is uniquely based on a hydraulic rating method.
ABSTRACT: The determination of instream flows for preserving or improving aquatic ecosystems’ health often
includes challenges caused by varied hydraulic conditions, ecological criteria, and socioeconomic considerations.
Despite the abundance of available methodologies, there are few available desktop or online applications
enabling rapid assessment of instream flows that incorporate pertinent geospatial information for the region.
We present R2Cross, a user-friendly, online, instream flow rate calculation tool that was developed for aiding
water allocation decisions in the state of Colorado. The R2Cross tool is the only existing online decision support
tool based on a hydraulic rating method. It estimates hydraulic conditions at different water stages in a stream
reach and compares them to habitat criteria to determine biological instream flow recommendations. Cloud-
based Geographic Information System features and additional tools are incorporated that augment information
and aid in evaluating ecological needs. The development of the R2Cross tool enables an open-access interface for
management authorities and stakeholders to evaluate ecological needs at stream reaches. It automates the
reporting process and could assist in making water management decisions about environmental protection.
Although the R2Cross tool was developed for the state of Colorado, it is generalizable to other stream systems
assuming similar habitat criteria.
(KEYWORDS: instream flows; R2Cross; web-based decision support system; Colorado; hydraulic rating
methodology.)
INTRODUCTION
Most river basins have undergone significant
human modifications, including instream flow
regime changes, threatening aquatic habitat or lead-
ing to degradation in moderate to high degrees
(Dudgeon et al. 2006; V
or
osmarty et al. 2010). Pro-
jected global population growth will increase water
demands in all sectors, especially the competition
for water between socioeconomic and environmental
demands (WWAP/UN-Water 2018). Management
methods, tools, and data, which are widely available
and easily accessible by water resources managers
and stakeholders, are needed to provide a system-
atic evaluation of viable allocation alternatives for
environmental needs (Oikonomou 2017). Specifically,
the natural flow regime plays a crucial role for
maintaining a healthy aquatic habitat (Poff et al.
1997). However, in modified streams, due to water
diversion and/or storage infrastructure, the natural
spatiotemporal flow variability is lost. Thus, deter-
mination of the minimum environmental flow levels
to protect the aquatic habitat can be difficult when
considering hydraulic conditions, ecological criteria,
and socioeconomic concerns.
Paper No. JAWR-20-0108-N of the Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWR). Received August 14, 2020; accepted
June 15, 2021. ©2021 American Water Resources Association. Discussions are open until six months from issue publication.
Colorado Water Institute (Oikonomou), Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado, USA; and Department of Civil and Environmen-
tal Engineering (Sidhu, Wible, Morrison), Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (Correspondence to Oikonomou: panagio-
tis.oikonomou@colostate.edu).
Citation: Oikonomou, P.D., R. Sidhu, T. Wible, and R.R. Morrison. 2021. “R2Cross: A Web-Based Decision Support Tool for Instream
Flows.” Journal of the American Water Resources Association 19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12939.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION JAWR1
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION
AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION
... These include the Tennant (Huang et al. 2019;Prakasam et al. 2021aPrakasam et al. , 2021b, 7Q10, Q90, Lyon, Texas (Yu et al. 2013;Opdyke et al. 2014), range of variability approach (RVA) (Monico et al. 2022), basic flow methodology (BFM) (Alomía Herrera & Carrera Burneo 2017), Tessmann (Pastor et al. 2014), frequency curve method, flow duration curve (FDC) (Maddu et al. 2022) and its improved method, etc. The hydraulics method relates various parameters of the hydraulic geometry of a watercourse channel to discharge, mainly including the wetted perimeter method (Prakasam et al. 2021a(Prakasam et al. , 2021b, R2-CROSS method (Oikonomou et al. 2021), Lotic Invertebrate Index for Flow Evaluation (LIFE) method (Extence et al. 1999), and Adapted Ecological Hydraulic Radius Approach (AEHRA) (Liu et al. 2011). However, such methods require tedious field work and an examination of each cross-sectional area leads to negative results in terms of time and data consumption (Prakasam & Saravanan 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
Ecological flow is a restrictive condition set for human water consumption in water resources management to protect river ecosystems. However, uncertainties in hydrological conditions, changes in regulatory capacity, and temporal-spatial differences bring difficulties to the implementation and supervision of ecological flows. By analyzing the relevant concept and connotation of ecological flow, it is concluded that the ecological flow regimes suitable for practical application should be a dynamic interval rather than a fixed value. Therefore, an improved ecological flow calculation method was proposed, which is to increase the feasible lifting volume for different ecological service objects based on the determined ecological baseflow. Taking two cross-sections of the Weihe River as an example, the ecological flow was calculated by comprehensively considering the factors of inflow, fish survival, landscape, and agricultural irrigation. The result shows the lifting volume occurred in the high flow season (April–June), and the maximum ecological flow of LJC and WJB cross-sections was 20.2 and 16.0 m3/s, respectively. Moreover, it is a generalized approach that can be extended to a more complicated river system, and the calculation results have reliability and adaptability in integrated water regulation.
Article
In small and medium-sized mountainous rivers, there are usually hydropower stations in upper reaches as well as widened and heightened river sections in downstream reaches that are close to settlements. The environmental flow (EF) ensures river connectivity and the survival of aquatic organisms. The Tennant and wetted perimeter methods were used to calculate the minimum EF, and the R2CROSS criteria were used to evaluate the rationality of hydraulic parameters. The result shows that downstream areas with large cross-sections may suffer from shallow water depths, insufficient wetted perimeters, and poor overall connectivity of the water bodies, even under the standard EF discharges. A novel method was proposed to ensure EF and sustain suitable hydraulic conditions. The minimum EF calculated by the Tennant method is adopted as the design flow, and a small trapezoidal trough channel is excavated on the wide riverbed of an artificial river section. The width and depth of the small channel are calculated with Manning's equation. As a study case, this method was applied in the Fenglingang River in Zhejiang Province of China. A trapezoidal groove with a depth of 0.74 m and a bottom width of 0.52 m was excavated in the center of Fenglingang River to sustain EF and maintain river connectivity. This small channel not only prevents the river from cutoff, but also enables the water depth and wetted perimeter to meet the demand of aquatic organisms.
Article
Full-text available
Water‐resources managers are challenged with maintaining a balance among beneficial uses throughout river networks and need robust means of assessing potential risks to aquatic life resulting from flow alterations. This study generated ecological limit functions from species‐streamflow relations to quantify potential fish richness response to flow alteration and compared results to currently accepted streamflow management guidelines. Modeled responses of absolute richness change were watershed specific and varied among sample sets derived from hydrologic unit classifications of different sizes (large HUC 6 basins to regional scale HUC 8). With a 20% flow reduction, 10% of HUC 8 predicted a richness decrease in one or more taxa. While absolute richness change was consistent across streams within a HUC, percent richness change was stream size dependent. Comparisons with Instream Flow Incremental Methodology habitat models predicted habitat loss greater than percent richness change; however, predictions for habitat and richness decreased similarly as stream size decreased. Watershed‐specific responses from flow reductions could allow water‐resources management decisions to be made locally based on the predicted richness change for certain sized streams. Quantitative results highlight the utility of a richness‐based framework for generating watershed‐specific risk assessments that validate and inform currently employed water‐resources management practices.
Article
Full-text available
Effective water resource management requires practical, data‐driven determination of instream flow needs. Newly developed, high‐resolution flow models and aquatic species databases provide enormous opportunity, but the volume of data can prove challenging to manage without automated tools. The objective of this study was to develop a framework of analytical methods and best practices to reduce costs of entry into flow–ecology analysis by integrating widely available hydrologic and ecological datasets. Ecological limit functions (ELFs) describing the relation between maximum species richness and stream size characteristics (streamflow or drainage area) were developed. Species richness is expected to increase with streamflow through a watershed up to a point where it either plateaus or transitions to a decreasing trend in larger streams. Our results show that identifying the location of this "breakpoint" is critical for producing optimal ELF model fit. We found that richness breakpoints can be estimated using automated low‐supervision methods, with high‐supervision providing negligible improvement in detection accuracy. Model fit (and predictive capability) was found to be superior in smaller hydrologic units. The ELF model ("elfgen" R package available on GitHub: https://github.com/HARPgroup/elfgen) can be used to generate ELFs using built‐in datasets for the conterminous United States, or applied anywhere else streamflow and biodiversity data inputs are available.
Article
Full-text available
Seasonal flow transitions between wet and dry conditions are a primary control on river conditions, including biogeochemical processes and aquatic life-history strategies. In regions like California with highly seasonal flow patterns and immense interannual variability, a rigorous approach is needed to accurately identify and quantify seasonal flow transitions from the annual flow regime. Drawing on signal processing theory, this study develops a transferable approach to detect the timing of seasonal flow transitions from daily streamflow time series using an iterative smoothing, feature detection, and windowing methodology. The approach is shown to accurately identify and characterize seasonal flows across highly variable natural flow regimes in California. A quantitative error assessment validated the accuracy of the approach, finding that inaccuracies in seasonal timing identification did not exceed 10%, with infrequent exceptions. Results for seasonal timing were also used to highlight the statistically distinct timing found across streams with varying climatic drivers in California. The proposed approach improves understanding of spatial and temporal trends in hydrologic processes and climate conditions across complex landscapes and informs environmental water management efforts by delineating timing of seasonal flows.
Poster
Full-text available
Since 1973 the Colorado Water Conservation Board has appropriated over 1,500 instream flow water rights in mountainous streams, covering nearly 8,500 miles, in order to preserve the natural environment. Determining the minimum required water quantity for reasonably healthy ecosystems can be a challenging task due to hydraulic conditions, ecological criteria, and socioeconomic considerations. In the State of Colorado, the R2Cross methodology, based on one-dimensional geometric and hydraulic data (stream channel geometry and measured discharge) collected in riffle habitat types, is used to determine the streamflow requirements for habitat protection. Open source technology was utilized for the development of a web-based tool that models instream hydraulic parameters. The platform Catena (eRAMS 2.0) was used for the R2Cross development, while the computational module is performed by R. The online R2Cross tool incorporates all prior functionality of older excel-based versions of the tool for calculating the roughness coefficient (Manning, Jarrett, and Thorne-Zevenbergen methods) and discharge at different stream stages. The tool also incorporates a user-friendly interface with new functionalities, including standalone tools for calculating stream discharge and particle size distribution, additional hydraulic equations based on relative channel roughness (Ferguson, Rickenmann-Recking), an online GIS environment that integrates available spatial layers, and streamflow recommendations comprised of dynamic graphs, tables and a custom report. The web-based R2Cross tool's capabilities would assist State authorities and stakeholders to evaluate ecological needs at mountainous streams in order to make informed water management decisions that balance socioeconomic needs with environmental preservation.
Chapter
Full-text available
“The water runs the river.” This chapter focuses on the river flow as the fundamental process determining the size, shape, structure, and dynamics of riverine ecosystems. We briefly introduce hydrological regimes as key characteristics of river flow. Hydrological regimes are then linked to habitats and biotic communities. The effects of flow regulation as a result of human activities such as water abstraction (irrigation and hydropower), river channelization, land use, and climate change are demonstrated. Finally, methods to assess the environmental flow, the flow that is needed to maintain the ecological integrity, are described, and examples of successful flow restoration presented.
Article
Full-text available
A distribution flow method (DFM) and its ecological flow index and evaluation grade standard are proposed to study the ecological flow of rivers based on broadening kernel density estimation. The proposed DFM and its ecological flow index and evaluation grade standard are applied into the calculation of ecological flow in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and compared with traditional calculation method of hydrological ecological flow, method of flow evaluation, and calculation result of fish ecological flow. Results show that the DFM considers the intra- and inter-annual variations in natural runoff, thereby reducing the influence of extreme flow and uneven flow distributions during the year. This method also satisfies the actual runoff demand of river ecosystems, demonstrates superiority over the traditional hydrological methods, and shows a high space–time applicability and application value.
Book
Full-text available
Environmental flows (EF) are an important component of Goal 6 (the ‘water goal’) of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Yet, many countries still do not have well-defined criteria on how to define EF. In this study, we bring together the International Water Management Institute’s (IWMI’s) expertise and previous research in this area to develop a new methodology to quantify EF at a global scale. EF are developed for grids (0.1 degree spatial resolution) for different levels of health (defined as environmental management classes [EMCs]) of river sections. Additionally, EF have been separated into surface water and groundwater components, which also helps in developing sustainable groundwater abstraction (SGWA) limits. An online tool has been developed to calculate EF and SGWA in any area of interest.