Content uploaded by Edwin Ramirez-Asís
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Edwin Ramirez-Asís on Sep 23, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Quantum cryptography technique: A way to improve security challenges
in mobile cloud computing (MCC)
Shafiqul Abidin
a,
⇑
, Amit Swami
b
, Edwin Ramirez-Asís
c
, Joseph Alvarado-Tolentino
d
,
Rajesh Kumar Maurya
e
, Naziya Hussain
f
a
Department of Computer Science, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
b
Emirates College of Technology, United Arab Emirates
c
Department of Administration and Tourism, Santiago Antúnez de Mayolo National University, USA
d
Department of Systems and Informatics Engineering, Santiago Antúnez de Mayolo National University, USA
e
Master of Computer Application, ABES Engineering College, Ghaziabad, India
f
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Computers, IPS Academy Indore, India
article info
Article history:
Received 4 May 2021
Received in revised form 15 May 2021
Accepted 28 May 2021
Available online xxxx
Keywords:
Quantum cryptography
DARPA
IPSEC
Twisted light
Mobile cloud computing
abstract
Quantum cryptography concentrates on the solution of cryptography that is imperishable due to the rea-
son of fortification of secrecy which is applied to the public key distribution of quantum. It is a very
prominent technology in which 2 beings can securely communicate along with the sights belongings
to quantum physics. However, on basis of classical level cryptography, the used encodes were bits for
data. As quantum utilizes the photons or particles polarize ones for encoding the quantized property.
This is presented in qubits as a unit. Transmissions depend directly on the inalienable mechanic’s law
of quantum for security. This paper includes detailed insight into the three most used and appreciated
quantum cryptography applications that are providing its domain-wide service in the field of mobile
cloud computing. These services are (it) DARPA Network, (ii) IPSEC implementation, and (iii) the twisted
light HD implementation along with quantum elements, key distribution, and protocols.
Ó2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 1st International Con-
ference on Computations in Materials and Applied Engineering – 2021.
1. Introduction
Einstein writes, ‘‘IT can’t believe God plays the cosmos dice,”!
However, quantum mechanics showed him to be mistaken and
an amazing crop for new in’s encryption schemes benefits from
the dices that Einstein found so worrying. While most people
assume that they are science fiction, quantum encryption systems
now operate, with experiments shielding internet traffic in urban
areas. These structures are so modern that they should take a
quantum cryptography distribution (QKD) or best as its third and
last insight into shaping cryptography in the 20th century [1].To
achieve perfect secrecy, it should be using Vernam ciphers, often
know as one-time pads,” for at least as long as this message would
not repeat. In fact, sadly, it was impossible for Vernam ciphers to
transmit one-time pads which would be totally confidential, com-
pletely uncommon, and one-off pads, so it was not commonly
accepted. The most popular techniques today are Diffie-Hellman
key exchangers and RSA prime factor algorithms. These key public
techniques are omnipresent. Unlike Shannon, who thought that
opponents had infinite mathematical abilities, public-key tactics
presume that such mathematical functions are a way in which to
do one thing, but are too hard to reverse in an adversary’s time
[2]. Specialized cryptographic instruments will elicit ever-fluid
streams of random bits whose values are invisible to third parties.
By using these parts as key material for Vernam ciphers, it can
quickly and cheaply attain the ideal of Shannon’s complete secrecy
[3]. In comparison, QKD offers information-theoretical confiden-
tiality, which is strongly founded on physics law, on the unproved
basis of core public technology. The quantum key dissemination
(QKD), first proposed in 1984 by Bennett and Brassard, is a tech-
nique for sending a concealed key. On account of a fundamental
trademark in quantum mechanics known as the no-cloning
hypothesis, any exertion by an outsider to snoop constantly brings
about mix-ups that the sender and beneficiary may distinguish.
Customarily, current QKD frameworks utilize a qubit framework
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.593
2214-7853/Ó2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 1st International Conference on Computations in Materials and Applied Engineering – 2021.
⇑
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: abidinshafiqul72@gmail.com (S. Abidin).
Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Materials Today: Proceedings
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/matpr
Please cite this article as: S. Abidin, A. Swami, E. Ramirez-Asís et al., Quantum cryptography technique: A way to improve security challenges in mobile
cloud computing (MCC), Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.593
to encode data, for example, photon polarization. These gadgets are
immediately sent, and today innovation is promptly accessible to
scramble and unravel data in the qubit state, permitting frame-
work clock speeds under the GHz system. The spatial level of pho-
ton opportunity has as of late been set up as a significant
wellspring of data move [4].
While such encoding plans offer a simple answer for expanding
data ability, as a result of the cross-talk instigated by diffraction
they are inadmissible for long-range optical associations. Diffrac-
tion incites a mind-boggling absence of spread for numerous spa-
tial frequencies, which brings about spatial modular combination.
Cross-talking raises the SER rate and essentially decreases the
ensured key pace of a QKD gadget. The utilization of OAM modes
will limit this unfavorable impact. OAM modes have the alluring
property of being symmetrical when spreading in a gadget with
roundabout gaps due to their rotational symmetry [5].
The occurrence of MCC has created a significant kind of turn-
around on computer science technology including on to the devel-
opers of the phone. MCC is vital technology nowadays, as it is
applicable in diverse services likewise: electronic mobile com-
merce (EMC), electronic mobile learning (EML), electronic mobile
banking (EMB), electronic mobile healthcare (EMH), and electronic
mobile game (EMG). However, mobile devices (MDs) are now
becoming very sophisticated; the reason behind it is the larger
development and application complexity. This offloading task onto
the cloud deals with many issues, including security, mobile appli-
cation development and quality of service.
2. Literature review
Integrity, availability and confidentiality problems are required
to get address as the task gets offloaded by means of the cloud. Pri-
vacy, end-to-end security, and authentication requirements to get
integrated by offloading the architecture kind of framework. It is
essential to be sure about the reliability and security of the task
for transmission of MDs to the cloud, the reason behind it is the
information. Data can get stored and also be moved into the cloud
by means of a wireless kind of connection. Because of the wireless
connection, transferring is now vulnerable for both zones including
the external and internal attacks. Quality of the service (QoS) is
very vital for the relaxation of effective transferring of the task in
the area of the cloud system.
2.1. Quantum key distribution
Modern networks typically rely on one of the two foundational
encryption strategies to ensure that traffic through the grid is con-
fidential and integral: symmetrical key and asymmetric key. In
particular, the best systems of today usually use both public key
signals and hidden ‘‘session” keys and then secure all or part of
the traffic flow with these session keys. Any other systems bring
hidden keys ‘‘out of the channel,” as in the case of traditional cryp-
tography, for instance by courier. Basically speaking, the unitary
dimensions of quantum mechanics theory of uncertainty and a
breach of Bell’s inequality by Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen – now pro-
poses a third model for key distribution: quantum encryption. The
efficacy of this paradigm seems demonstrated by initial studies [6].
In order to ensure the secrecy of transmitted records, basic regula-
tions of design may also be applied if the theoretical models are
verified in the use of the real equipment. QKD consists of a dim
light pulse transmitted from Alice to Bob via the quantum medium,
e.g. as dim light pulses, plus the sorting of the real main content.
This method includes public contact with the advanced QKD algo-
rithms (key agreement protocols) between Alice and Bob on the
public network. The key results can then be used to secure user
traffic, for example, for cryptographic purposes. According to the
laws of quantity physics, any Eva (Eve), which induces snoops on
the quantum canal, causes the flux of individual photons to be
troubling. It can be observed by Alice and Bob, taking suitable reac-
tions and thus the eavesdropping effort by Eve [7]. This creates a
hypothesis that for resisting quantum computer order, new sys-
tems which would not be based on discrete logarithms issues have
to be explored. This is the only way through which data security
can get a guarantee for the future internet in the zone of cyber-
space [8].
Bennett and Brassard, who likewise portrayed the primary QKD
convention called BB84, proposed in 1984 quantum cryptography.
A couple of examination groups the world over had the option to
create and run quantum cryptographic gadgets during the creative
cycle. Apparently, there is also the interest in cryptograms based
on a very different physical phenomenon - intertwining between
pairs of photons produced by spontaneous parametric downgrad-
ing - which is weak, coherent quantum cryptography (SPDC). This
is what it is talking about. Geneva has shown and explored cryp-
tography in many important papers. An excellent summary of
QKD’s present state of the art was presented by the Geneva team
[9]. It highly encourages anybody who wants to get to know more
about this fascinating area.
Quantum data properties: The concept of the whole uncer-
tainty principle was the position of a particle in the world of micro
which is not possible at all to get determined, thus it does exist in
diverse spaces along with diverse chances [10]. It’s proposed that
when a copy of any arbitrary gets deletes in a quantum state isn’t
allowed through the linearity of theory by quantum.
3. Methodologies
Alice sends to Bob an arbitrarily module set of single photons (a
double-sided card here with a random number. Alice picks one
card side by chance and sends the card to Bob by writing random
0 or 1 on that side. Bob also picks a random side and reads the
value of this side. Bob reads exactly what Alice wrote as Alice
and Bob take the same hand. If not, he reads a 0 or 1 at random
overall [11]. Since Bob has read all the photons, Alice is performing
a scanning transaction to discard any situations in which he reads
wrong (basis). It sends Alice the random basis settings list and
informs him which settings are correct. Alice and Bob then deny
any value on which they differ and retain the remaining raw mate-
rial values. Now, what about a ruminant, who is it going to name
Eve? In the first place, Eve is like Bob. She would imagine what side
of the card she’ll be able to read, and the other half will be of ran-
dom importance for the half of the time she reads what Alice sent.
But a little bit of a single photon she cannot surreptitiously sift so
she demolishes it as she reads it. But if this photon is not obtained,
it does not lose; this method of sifting will discard the photon, and
Alice and Bob will not include it in their main stuff [12]. The no-
cloning theorem of Quantum Mechanics states it cannot clone val-
ues on both sides of the card — only the side on which it reads. A
random value may be on the other hand. In actual systems, how-
ever, some channel noise is still present and even though they
require wiping out operations, the cryptographic device may work
with some level of sound. In order to resolve this problem, it uses
reasonably robust error detecting and correction protocols in order
to identify and correct bit errors and the effect is compounded by
anonymity, such that Eve knows just a little bit about the resulting
Alice and Bob values [31,13].
S. Abidin, A. Swami, E. Ramirez-Asís et al. Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
2
3.1. QKD in systems
In 1992 Bennet and Brassard designed the first rudimentary
QKD apparatus; since then, many systems, including systems built
by Los Alamos, British Telecom, Johns Hopkins University, and IBM
Almaden Research Center, have followed. QKD can run via telecom
fiber or the atmosphere. While their technological specifics vary
considerably, researchers have seen both methods. At a rate of
about 5,000 bits/s at a distance of up to 50 km via telecom or
10–20 km through the atmosphere, today’s devices produce very
high-end main content [14,32]. Although these speeds are not high
enough to secure valuable single pad traffic, they permit the fast
re-encryption of traditional cryptographic algorithms, such as the
Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). Each device uses a typical
wavelength (1550.12 nm) highly attenuated ‘‘single-photon”
telecommunications laser with phase modulation through Mach
Zehnder unbalanced interferometers and APDs, which detect single
photons [33,15]. An additional Mach-Zehnder interferometer is
contained in the Receiver at Bob, arbitrarily set in one of two
phases for demodulation. Alice often transmits a light pulse, a stan-
dard amount of power for telecommunications that is multiplied
by the same fiber [16].Fig. 1 illustrate the complete functioning.
3.2. Protocols and algorithms
During the production of its systems, it found that QKD optics is
probably the easiest part; electronics are harder than optics and
software is harder than electronics for a practical device. Fig. 4
demonstrates how QKD protocols could integrate into a UNIX
operating system, providing key material for use in cryptography
protecting Internet traffic through standard IPsec protocols and
algorithms for its Indigenous Internet Key Exchange (IKE). BBN
QKD protocol stack is written in C for portability to real-time
devices that are embedded. David Pearson, Gregory Troxel (BBN
Technologies) and IT will explore this deployment more in-depth,
and how QKD communicates elsewhere with IKE and IPsec 8.
Fig. 2 shows the complete functionality. This process happens
by some form of one-way function, such as the digital signatures
implemented using key-public techniques in most modern crypto-
graphic schemes. Authentication is based on mutual secret keys in
classical QKD literature, such as universal hash functionality
[17,34].
3.3. QKD DARPA networks
The DARPA Quantum Network comprises two Alice and Anna
transmitters and two viable receptors, Bob and Boris, with quan-
tum channels associated straightforwardly through the fiber by
means of a two-stage optical switch. For one or the other collector,
either sender may arrange a common key. The switch is optically
aloof: as such, no photons that move through it is distinguished
or enhanced so the quantum condition of the photons that encode
fundamental pieces can’t be disturbed. Where two QKD endpoints
don’t share a direct or exchanged channel, yet are cross-canalized
by confided in transfers, its systems administration conventions
permit them to concur on a mutual key by choosing an organiza-
tion course, creating another R-number and sending a one-time R
cushion scrambled on every association [18]. The following flow
of QKD will be a lot more bizarre than it is today since it will get
important material from sets of many-sided photons. This is in cer-
tain regards the most acceptable of all methods of QKD since it
uses the intrinsic inconsistency and marvel of the universe
[19,35].Fig. 3 shows the complete functionality.
3.4. QKD architectures
As observed, Alice’s transmitter communicates singular photons
with a laser heartbeat of 1550 nm that is unequivocally con-
stricted. Any of them goes through an arbitrarily regulated Mach-
Zehnder interferometer in Alice in one of four focuses, encoding
both a premise and an incentive for the self-obstruction of the pho-
ton. Another Mach Zehnder interferometer is utilized in the Bob
beneficiary, arbitrarily regulated in one of the two stages to pick
a base. The photons gathered travel through the Bob interferome-
ter for one of the two thermoelectrically cooled single-photon indi-
cators to show worth. Alice is likewise communicating light
heartbeats duplicated by a similar fiber, at 1300 nm to give Bob
data about planning and outlining.
Figs. 4-6 exhibit the crucial instrument of its progression encod-
ing framework.
Fig. 5 represents how a genuine photon functions with its heart-
beat from Alice’s 1550 nm QKD source into the Bob locator pair.
Here you can see the photon rather than a molecule as a wave.
Hence the interferometer is taking the two headings as opposed
to choosing a solitary bearing.
Fig. 6 demonstrates the blend of the resultant twofold beat of
the Bob 50/50 coupler before the finders. The beat in the upper
train is pretty much precisely coordinated with that in the lower
train when the interferometers were changed right, which implies
that the two amplitudes are added together. The correct part of the
graph shows a composite waveform before the 50/50 sets of QKD
finders from Bob. At last, it is presently ready to exhibit decisively
how estimations of ‘ and ‘1’ are sent among Alice and Bob utilizing
QKD beats. As it portrayed, it was the blend of twofold heartbeat
that made the focal pinnacle, expecting that interferometers Alice
and Bob are pretty much definitely coordinated.
Fig. 1. BBN quantum cryptography (FD).
S. Abidin, A. Swami, E. Ramirez-Asís et al. Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
3
3.5. IPSEC implementation
On the off chance that a cryptographic quantic key substance
has been finished, it tends to be utilized as keys for at least one
application. Its first utilization of these key substances is for
IPsec-based virtual private organizations as standard encryption
keys. As needs are, both the preparing way of IPsec and its funda-
mental arrangement convention (IKE) have been extended to uti-
lize basic material acquired with quantum cryptography. Since
both Alice and Bob persistently stream new data, the two of them
can change the key uses pretty much consistently in their crypto-
graphic calculations [36,20]. One of its components, the IKE con-
vention, requires two endpoints to concur on the cryptographic
conventions and calculations that they might want to use for a
given security affiliation, and the other on the keys they use to
encode as well as confirm the accompanying message traffic in this
security affiliation [21]. Inside the IETF, RFC 2409, Internet Key
Exchange, IKE is determined as a standard record (IKE). While
IKE is a generally intricate convention, its essential standards are
clear. Figure 10 uncovers the critical components of the current
kinship between two IKE peers. The utilization of IKE for quantum
encryption is of specific importance for a modest bunch of novel
IKE configuration pieces, which can impact its general gadget plan
[22]. This can without much of a stretch occurs in quantum cryp-
tography since clamor must be noticed and probabilistically
revised in a solitary photon channel. IKE doesn’t have any
Fig. 2. BBN QC protocols.
Fig. 3. QKD Networks.
S. Abidin, A. Swami, E. Ramirez-Asís et al. Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
4
frameworks to notice or treat certain circumstances. The outcome
appears to have not been appropriately encoding/interpreted for
all security affiliations utilizing key pieces extricated from this
bad data. It will appear to be that this condition will continue until
the security affiliation is reestablished, for example, another secu-
rity affiliation is moved [35,23].
3.6. QKD with twisted light technology
Alice has subjectively chosen two extra bases for her photons in
its framework. A determination of OAM vortex modes is the essen-
tial coding source. The two modes have a setup of extreme focus
and a helical advance profile as follows:
u
l
OAM ¼e
il
u
ð1Þ
A straight blend of OAM record modes with equal amplitudes is
utilized to make the commonly fair-minded premise set as:
u
n
ANG
¼1
ffiffiffi
d
pX
N
l¼N
u
l
OAM
exp i2
p
nl
d
ð2Þ
Whereas, in its test the measurements are (D = 2 N + 1 = 7). Because
of their restricted adequacy varieties, it alludes to such modes as
Fig. 4. Paths through unbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometers.
Fig. 5. Effects of an unbalanced interferometer on a photon.
Fig. 6. Recombined photon at 50 / 50 coupler just before Bob’s QKD detectors. The central peak is self-interfering.
S. Abidin, A. Swami, E. Ramirez-Asís et al. Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
5
precise (ANG) modes. As opposed to OAM modes, ANG modes are
commonly lopsided, given as:
h
u
n
ANG
j
u
l
OAM
i
2
¼1
d8n;lfg ð3Þ
Through a 4f telescope, which frames a lossless 2 m long con-
tact connect, arrangements are then imaged at Bob’s getting open-
ing [24,34]. The means made in different bases were then disposed
of by Alice and Bob. Now, the key created is known as the screwed
key [25,33]. This is achieved by using a universal hash function to
make the error-corrected key a short random key.
4. Results and analysis
Performance of transport and identification:The efficiency of
the refractive components of the modal sorter is estimated by 85%.
For holograms and the corresponding phase correction feature, two
Holoeye PLUTO phase-only SLM’s are used. Moreover, the SLMs are
fitted with two cylindrical lenses to adapt the look ratio of the
transformed straps. Per SLM is measured at a diffraction efficiency
of about 45 percent. The efficiency of connections between the
converted modes and the fiber spectrum has been estimated at
about 18%.
Classical ability for knowledge: This scheme avoids the time-
less changeover between various spatial modes and makes it pos-
sible to calculate the error rate even more accurately using a large
range of symbols sent and received. But a uniform lack of coordina-
tion and detection does not modify the shared knowledge between
the sifted keys of Alice and Bob as the time-frames are excluded in
the reconciliation protocol without a photon-detection occurrence
[26,32].
IKE security: The Eavesdropper (Eve) tests the status of the
caught photon on an arbitrarily picked premise in a capture resend
assault and afterward sends a photon back that will be in a similar
condition. Eve reliably studies few audits to acquire data about the
fundamentals in a precise attack. From this chart, it is obvious that
its trial SER is far beneath the essential wellbeing limits against
block attempts and reliable assaults [27,31].
High efficiency: When losses rise, the main generation rate
decreases. The protocol also becomes vulnerable to PNS attacks
due to high contact losses. With high-efficiency sLMs or with AR-
coated custom refractive elements the performance of its detection
system can be easily improved. This would mean that the propaga-
tion quality of its experiment would be improved six times. Fur-
thermore, the amount of damage induced by the air dispersion
can be decreased by activity in the near-infrared device.
Mitigation of turbulence: The spatial profile of modes can
degrade as atmospheric turbulence arises. As a result, the nearby
OAM and ANG models are merged. Turbulence has been a target
of detailed studies in OAM modes. The use of all other approaches
to encrypt and use adaptive optics Technologies are standard
strategies for mitigating the detrimental effects of atmospheric
turbulence. Long-range open-space dissemination of OAM modes
with new detection schemes has recently been carried out [28,36].
Longer dimension: More modes improve the amount of infor-
mation that each photon carries which results in a higher protected
bit rate. It previously showed that its Mode Sorter would filter 25
OAM and ANG modes per observed photons with an average
mutual knowledge of 4.17 bits. Consequently, the number of APDs
in this experiment will easily increase the encoded information per
photon [29,30]. Finally, through sizing and receiving apertures, the
amount of modes that the optical communication supports is
reduced.
5. Conclusion
The DARPA Quantum Network uncovers that quantum encryp-
tion can be utilized truth be told, on a fundamental level, to furnish
virtual private web networks with a ceaseless key dispersion. Any
significant components of the quantum cryptography hypothesis
are still exceptionally bewildering. On the basis of classical cryp-
tography and quantum mechanics, quantum cryptography is a
fresh and new system in the line of cryptography. As compared
to classical cryptography, it has ultimate benefits are in the zone
of an unconditional sniffing detection system along with security.
The characteristics can aid in resolving the security of cyberspace
on the basis of critical issues for the internet. As being specific, it
generates the security for diverse applications, likewise: smart
cities, internet, and future internet as cyberspace. The analysis on
the basis of experiments has shown the conclusion of uncondi-
tional security along with the detection of sniffing on behalf of
quantum cryptography that makes it very suitable for the usage
of the internet in the future. The various assaults and the definite
quantum–mechanical hypothesis behind photon yield, engender-
ing, identification, and so on to put it plainly, it is currently evident
that quantum cryptography is in fact conceivable.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Shafiqul Abidin: Investigation, Supervision. Amit Swami: Writ-
ing - review & editing. Edwin Ramirez-Asís: Writing - review &
editing. Joseph Alvarado-Tolentino: Investigation. Rajesh Kumar
Maurya: Supervision. Naziya Hussain: Investigation, Writing -
original draft.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing finan-
cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared
to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
[1] H.B. AbdulWahab, A.M.S. Rahma, July). Proposed new quantum cryptography
system using quantum description techniques for generated curves, In The
2009 International conference on security and management, 2009.
[2] G. Alagic, G. Alagic, J. Alperin-Sheriff, D. Apon, D. Cooper, Q. Dang, R. Perlner.
Status report on the first round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography
standardization process. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of
Standards and Technology. 2019.
[3] S.M. Barnett, S.J. Phoenix, Information-theoretic limits to quantum
cryptography, Phys. Rev. A 48 (1) (1993) R5.
[4] C.H. Bennett, Experimental quantum cryptography, J. Cryptol. 5 (1) (1992) 3–
28.
[5] C.H. Bennet, G. Brassard. Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and
coin tossing, Proc. Int’l Conf. Computers Systems & Signal Processing, pp. 175-
179 1984.
[6] C.H. Bennett, G. Brassard, A.K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography, Sci. Am. 267 (4)
(1992) 50–57.
[7] D.J. Bernstein, Introduction to Post-Quantum Cryptography. In Post-Quantum
Cryptography, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 1–14.
[8] P. Bhatia, R. Sumbaly. Framework for wireless network security using quantum
cryptography. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.2495. 2014.
[9] D. Bouwmeester, Experimental quantum teleportation, Nature 390 (1997)
577–579.
[10] A. Broadbent, C. Schaffner, Quantum cryptography beyond quantum key
distribution, Des. Codes Crypt. 78 (1) (2016) 351–382.
[11] Y. Chen, P.K. Verma, S. Kak, Embedded security framework for integrated
classical and quantum cryptography services in optical burst switching
networks, Security Commun. Netw. 2 (6) (2009) 546–554.
[12] M. Christandl, R. König, R. Renner, Postselection technique for quantum
channels with applications to quantum cryptography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2)
(2009) 020504.
[13] C. Elliott, D. Pearson, G. Troxel, August). Quantum cryptography in practice, in:
In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Applications, technologies,
architectures, and protocols for computer communications, 2003, pp. 227–
238.
S. Abidin, A. Swami, E. Ramirez-Asís et al. Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
6
[14] N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, H. Zbinden, Quantum cryptography, Rev. Mod.
Phys. 74 (1) (2002) 145.
[15] A. Goyal, S. Aggarwal, A. Jain, Quantum Cryptography & its Comparison with
Classical Cryptography: A Review Paper, In 5th IEEE International Conference
on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies [ICACCT-2011],
2011.
[16] H.J. Hughes, Practical Free-space quantum key distribution over 10 km in
daylight and at night, New J. Phys. (2002) 43–51.
[17] B.C. Jacobs, J.D. Franson, Quantum cryptography in free space, Opt. Lett. 21 (22)
(1996) 1854–1856.
[18] H.K. Lo, N. Lütkenhaus. Quantum cryptography: from theory to practice. arXiv
preprint quant-ph/0702202. 2007.
[19] N. Lütkenhaus, Estimates for practical quantum cryptography, Phys. Rev. A 59
(5) (1999) 3301.
[20] T.M.T. Nguyen, M.A. Sfaxi, S. Ghernaouti-Hélie. Integration of quantum
cryptography in 802.11 networks. In First International Conference on
Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES’06) (pp. 8-pp). IEEE.
[21] M. Niemiec, Error correction in quantum cryptography based on artificial
neural networks, Quantum Inf. Process. 18 (6) (2019) 174.
[22] H.R. Pawar, D.G. Harkut. Classical and Quantum Cryptography for Image
Encryption & Decryption. In 2018 International Conference on Research in
Intelligent and Computing in Engineering (RICE) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. 2018.
[23] C. Peng, J. Chen, S. Zeadally, D. He, Isogeny-based cryptography: a promising
post-quantum technique, IT Prof. 21 (6) (2019) 27–32.
[24] S.J. Phoenix, S.M. Barnett, P.D. Townsend, K.J. Blow, Multi-user quantum
cryptography on optical networks, J. Mod. Opt. 42 (6) (1995) 1155–1163.
[25] S.J. Phoenix, S.M. Barnett, A. Chefles, Three-state quantum cryptography, J.
Mod. Opt. 47 (2–3) (2000) 507–516.
[26] T.C. Ralph, Security of continuous-variable quantum cryptography, Phys. Rev.
A 62 (6) (2000) 062306.
[27] J.G. Rarity, P.R. Tapster, P.M. Gorman, P. Knight, Ground to satellite secure key
exchange using quantum cryptography, New J. Phys. 4 (1) (2002) 82.
[28] M.S. Sharbaf. Quantum cryptography: An emerging technology in network
security. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland
Security (HST) (pp. 13-19). IEEE. 2011.
[29] M. Tomamichel, C.C.W. Lim, N. Gisin, R. Renner, Tight finite-key analysis for
quantum cryptography, Nat. Commun. 3 (1) (2012) 1–6.
[30] D. Chauhan, C. Singh. Sentimental Analysis on Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak.
In: Agrawal S., Kumar Gupta K., H. Chan J., Agrawal J., Gupta M. (eds) Machine
Intelligence and Smart Systems. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer,
Singapore. 2021 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4893-6_21.
[31] Deepika Chauhan, Ashok Kumar, Pradeep Bedi, Vijay Anant Athavale, D.
Veeraiah, Boppuru Rudra Pratap, An effective face recognition system based on
Cloud based IoT with a deep learning model, Microprocessors Microsyst. 81
2021 103726,ISSN 0141-9331, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103726.
[32] Pradeep Bedi, Shivlal Mewada, Rasmbabu Arjunarao Vatti, Chaitanya Singh,
Kanwalvir Singh Dhindsa, Muruganantham Ponnusamy, Ranjana Sikarwar,
Detection of attacks in IoT sensors networks using machine learning
algorithm, Microprocessors Microsyst. 82 2021,103814,ISSN 0141-9331,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103814.
[33] Z. Qureshi, N. Agrawal, D. Chouhan, Cloud based IOT: Architecture, application,
challenges and future, Int. J. Sci. Res. Comput. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 3 (2018)
359–368.
[34] , IoT–Blockchain Integration-Based Applications Challenges and Opportunities
vol 140 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7130-5_7.
[35] M. S. T. M. C. S. M. S. Survey of Protocol for Provisioning of QOS in MANETS. Int.
J. Recent Innov. Trends Comput. Commun. 3(5) 2015 2587-2590. https://doi.
org/10.17762/ijritcc.v3i5.4289.
[36] C. Singh, M.R. Aloney, Comparative Study of LEACH Routing Protocol for WSN,
Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Manage. Stud. 3 (3) (2015) 322–327.
S. Abidin, A. Swami, E. Ramirez-Asís et al. Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
7
