ArticlePDF Available

Unknown diversity: survey of Neuroptera (Insecta) in Paraná, southern Brazil, reveals 14 species newly recorded from the state and country

Pensoft Publishers
Check List
Authors:

Abstract

The PROFAUPAR project (1986-1987) studied insect diversity in the Atlantic rainforest through collections made at eight different sites in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Here, we review and identify the collected neuropterans, carry out a bibliographic review, and compose a list of the Neuroptera species that occur in the state. This study includes 14 new records in Paraná, including the first records of Ascalaphinae (Myrmeleontidae) and a new record of Dilaridae for Brazil. It increases by 29.2% the number of species of Neuroptera known from Paraná. Forty-seven Neuroptera species are now known to occur in the state. Citation: Schuster PA, Machado RJP (2021) Unknown diversity: survey of Neuroptera (Insecta) in Paraná, southern Brazil, reveals 14 species newly recorded from the state and country. Check List 17 (3):
Unknown diversity: survey of Neuroptera (Insecta) in Paraná,
southern Brazil, reveals 14 species newly recorded from the state
and country
Phillip Alves Schuster1*, Renato Jose Pires Machado1
1 Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Zoologia Curitiba (Paraná), Brazil • PAS: phillip_alves_schuster@hotmail.com https://
orcid.org/0000-0003-1087-6412 • RJPM: rjpmachado@gmail.com https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3155-3639
* Corresponding author
Abstract
The PROFAUPAR project (1986–1987) studied insect diversity in the Atlantic rainforest through collections made at
eight dierent sites in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Here, we review and identify the collected neuropterans, carry out a
bibliographic review, and compose a list of the Neuroptera species that occur in the state. This study includes 14 new
records in Paraná, including the rst records of Ascalaphinae (Myrmeleontidae) and a new record of Dilaridae for
Brazil. It increases by 29.2% the number of species of Neuroptera known from Paraná. Forty-seven Neuroptera species
are now known to occur in the state.
Keywords
Checklist, lacewings, Neuropterida, owlies, Paraná, PROFAUPAR
Academic editor: Tiago Kütter Krolow | Received 2 April 2021 | Accepted 15 June 2021 | Published 30 June 2021
Citation: Schuster PA, Machado RJP (2021) Unknown diversity: survey of Neuroptera (Insecta) in Paraná, southern Brazil, reveals 14 species newly
recorded from the state and country. Check List 17 (3): 993–1005. https://doi.org/10.15560/17.3.993
Introduction
The order Neuroptera (Insecta, Neuropterida), commonly
known as lacewings and antlions, has a cosmopolitan dis-
tribution (except for Antarctica) and comprises approxi-
mately 5,800 species distributed in 15 families, of which
nine occur in Brazil (Oswald and Machado 2018; Machado
et al. 2019). This relatively small order of insects is rep-
resented in Brazil by 426 species (Machado and Martins
2021) and despite the fact that in South America, Brazil
is the country with the greatest diversity (Martins 2019),
studies dealing with these insects are relatively scarce.
In the past, studies focusing on Brazilian Neuroptera
were mostly concentrated in the Amazon region, mainly
due to the series of papers published by Dr. Norman D.
Penny (e.g., Penny 1981; Meinander and Penny 1982;
Adams and Penny 1985), but more recently a growing
body of records of new species have been established in
other regions of the country (e.g., Martins and Amorim
2015; Silva and Freire 2015; Assmar and Salles 2017;
Alvim et al. 2019; Machado and Tavares 2020). How-
ever, there have been no large-scale surveys of the Bra-
zilian Neuroptera published to date. Paraná state, located
in southern Brazil, is dominated by the Atlantic rainfor-
est, where the neuropterofauna is certainly understudied
despite faunistic surveys in this biodiversity hotspot.
The “Levantamento da Fauna Entomológica no Esta-
do do Paraná’’ (PROFAUPAR) [Survey of Entomological
Check List 17 (3): 993–1005
https://doi.org/10.15560/17.3.993
3
17
© The authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
994 Check List 17 (3)
Fauna in Paraná State] was a project conducted during
a one-year period from 1986 to 1987 at eight collection
sites on the coast and the three plateaus in the Para
state (Marinoni and Dutra, 1991). A total of 2,470,160
specimens belonging to various orders of insects were
collected (Marinoni and Dutra 1991), and the data on the
fauna composition have been subsequently published by
several authors studying insect groups such as Lepidop-
tera (Marinoni and Dutra 1996; Marinoni et al. 1997;
Marinoni et al. 1999), Trichoptera (Marinoni and Almei-
da 2000), Diptera (Costacurta et al. 2003), Hymenoptera
(Azevedo et al. 2006), and Coleoptera (Fernandes and
Linzmeier 2012). The insect specimens collected during
the project also allowed for the descriptions of new spe-
cies, like the seed beetle Amblycerus profaupar Ribeiro-
Costa, 2000 (Coleoptera, Bruchidae) (Ribeiro-Costa,
2000) and for the updating of the known distributions of
other species (Turcatel et al. 2007; Fernandes and Linz-
meier 2012).
The PROFAUPAR project was, and still is, the only
large-scale study to sample the order Neuroptera in the
Paraná state. However, the data on this order has not yet
been published, which was mainly due to the absence of a
specialist in the group in Brazil. Recently we had access
to the lacewing material in the PROFAUPAR samples.
This material was identied and found to include sev-
eral species newly recorded from Paraná. Thus, we pres-
ent a list of these species new for the state and including
a species recorded from Brazil for the rst time. These
data include important information on the biodiversity of
Neuroptera in the Paraná and will assist in future studies.
Methods
The insects were collected in eight localities in the state
of Paraná (Fig. 1) between August 1986 and July 1987
using the “ESALQ” light trap (Marinoni and Dutra 1991).
The samples were taken every two weeks, preserved in
70% ethanol, and stored in the Entomological Collection
Padre Jesus Santiago Moure (DZUP) housed at the Uni-
versidade Federal do Paraná, Brazil. Detailed descrip-
tions of the collection localities (oristics, climate, and
phytogeographic classication) were described by Mari-
noni and Dutra (1991). The locations of the eight sampled
areas are indicated in the map (Fig. 1), which was built
using Simplemappr (Shorthouse 2010).
Only adults were collected, and these insects were
studied with a stereomicroscope to observe the exter-
nal anatomy and terminalia, and were identied at the
lowest possible taxonomic level with the help of dichoto-
mous keys for the respective groups (Osmylidae: Mar-
tins et al. 2019; Mantispidae: Machado and Rafael 2010a;
Chrysopidae: Freitas and Penny 2001; Breitkreuz 2018;
Myrmeleontidae: van der Weele 1908; Navás 1912; Penny
1981; Stange 1994; Ábrahám 2013; Hemerobiidae: Penny
and Monserrat 1983; Dilaridae: Adams 1970; Machado
and Rafael 2010b; Sisyridae: Assmar and Salles 2017;
Coniopterygidae: Martins and Amorim 2016). Terminol-
ogy follows Aspöck and Aspöck (2008) for genitalia and
Breitkreuz et al. (2017) for the wing venation. Due to dif-
culties with identication, such as the fragility of the
material preserved in alcohol for years, and taxonomic
problems within some groups, some insects were not
identied to species. We also carried out a bibliographic
Figure 1. Map of Brazil (left) and Paraná state (right) with the sampled locates of the PROFAUPAR. Antonina (25°2800ʺS, 048°5000ʺW);
São José dos Pinhais (25°3400ʺS, 049° 0100ʺW); Colombo (25°2000ʺS , 0 49 °1400ʺW); Ponta Grossa (25°1302ʺS, 050°0214ʺW); Telêmaco
Borba (24°1700ʺS, 050°3700ʺW); Guarapuava (25°4000ʺS, 052°0100ʺW); Jundiaí do Sul (23°2600ʺS, 050°1600ʺW); Fênix (23°5451ʺS,
051°5745ʺW).
Schuster and Machado | Neuroptera (Insecta) of the PROFAUPAR project 995
review of the species known to occur in Paraná; this was
based on the “Catálago Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil”
(Machado and Martins 2021) and additional literature.
Results
During the project 256 insects of the order Neuroptera
were collected. The most abundant families were Sisyri-
dae (n = 76; 29.68%), Chrysopidae (n = 60; 23.43%),
Hemerobiidae n = 54; 21.09%), and Myrmeleontidae (n =
46; 17.96%) (Appendix, Table A1). Previous to this study,
only 34 species of Neuroptera were known to occur in
Paraná (Table 1), but with the new data provided here, we
add 14 additional species in the state and one additional
species in Brazil.
Newly recorded species in Para
Order Neuroptera Linnaeus, 1758
Family Chrysopidae Schneider, 1851
Subfamily Nothochrysinae Navás, 1910
Genus Asthenochrysa Adams & Penny, 1992
Asthenochrysa sp.
Material exami ned. BRAZIL – Paraná • Fêni x, Reserva
Estadual Vila Rica (ITCF); 23°54′51ʺS, 051°57′45ʺW;
02.XI.1986; RC Marinoni and RRC Dutra leg.; light trap;
1 ♀; DZUP 381713; PROFAUPAR.
Identi cation. Three genera of Nothochrysinae occur in
South America: Asthenochrysa, Leptochrysa Adams &
Penny, 1992, and Nothochrysa McLachlan, 1868 (Tau-
ber 2019). According to Adams & Penny (1992), Asthe-
nochrysa can be identied by having antennae with the
agellar segments with ve setal rows and by the lack of
fusion of the second and third anal veins of the forewing.
Asthenochrysa diers from Leptochrysa by the geo-
graphic distribution and the absence of uniquely narrow
wings, rectangular gradate cells, and a distinctive intra-
median cell, which make this genus distinct from other
Nothochrysinae. Asthenochrysa can be separated from
Nothochrysa by its geographic distribution; the latter has
a single species in Chile (Tauber 2019). Asthenochrysa
larvae are still unknown (Tauber 2019).
Comments. The specimen reported here most likely be-
longs to A. viridula (Adams, 1978), the only species de-
scribed for the genus and the only nothochrysine species
known from Brazil. However, specic identication is
made dicult because it is based on the male termina-
lia. Asthenochrysa was included by Machado and Mar-
tins (2021) in a catalog of Neuroptera from the state, but
this was based on personal observations of the research-
ers responsible for updating the “Catálogo Taxonômico
da Fauna do Brasil” (C. Martins pers. comm.). Thus, the
material examined here represents the rst fully docu-
mented record from the state.
Updated distribution in Brazil. Paraná.
Subfamily Chrysopinae Schneider, 1851
Tribe Belonopterygini Navás, 1913
Genus Nacarina Navás, 1915
Nacarina sagitta de Freitas & Penny, 2001
Material exami ned. BRAZIL – Paraná • Fêni x, Reserva
Estd. de Vila Rica (ITCF); 23°54′5S, 051°57′45ʺW;
04.X.1986, 02.XI.1986, 29.XI.1986; 3 ♀ and 3 ♂, DZUP
381739; DZUP 381740, DZUP 381742; RC Marinoni
and RRC Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR Te-
lêmaco Borba, Reserva Biológica Klabin; 24°17′00ʺS,
050°37′00ʺW; 29.III.1987; 1 ♂; DZUP 381738; RC Mari-
noni and RRC Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR.
Identi cation. The specimens were identied by the
combination of the following characters: apical segment
of maxillary palps tubular, head without dark markings,
and genital characteristics as presented in Freitas and
Penny (2001).
Comments. According to Freitas and Penny (2001), Na-
carina is the most common genus of the tribe Belonop-
terygini, with most species of the genus distributed in
South America.
Updated distribution in Brazil. Paraná, São Paulo.
Tribe Chrysopini Schneider, 1851
Genus Plesiochrysa Adams, 1982
Plesiochrysa brasiliensis (Schneider, 1851)
Material exami ned. BRAZIL – Paraná • Fêni x, Reserva
Estd. de Vila Rica (ITCF); 23°54′51ʺS, 051°57′45ʺW;
02.XI.1986; 1 ♂; DZUP 381737; RC Marinoni and RRC
Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR • Ponta Grossa, Vila
Velha res. IAPAR BR 376; 25°13′02ʺS, 050°02′14ʺW;
01.I.1987; 1 ♂; DZUP 381735; RC Marinoni and RRC
Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR.
Identi cation. The genus is recognized by the presence
of red spots on the pronotum and externally visible geni-
tal characteristics as shown by Freitas and Penny (2001).
This species can be recognized principally by the pale
antennal agellum and the equal width and length of the
pronotum, which has the lateral spots separated.
Comments. Plesiochrysa contains four species in Brazil
(Machado and Martins 2021) and none had been recorded
from Paraná until now. Tauber et al. (2001) described the
biology and immature stages of P. brasiliensis.
Updated distribution in Brazil. Amazonas, Distrito
Federal, Maranhão, Minas Gerais, Pará, Paraná, Rio de
Janeiro, São Paulo, Santa Catarina.
Family Coniopterygidae Burmeister, 1839
Subfamily Coniopteryginae Burmeister, 1839
Tribe Coniopterygini Burmeister, 1839
Genus Coniopteryx Curtis, 1834
Subgenus Scotoconiopteryx Meinander, 1972
Coniopteryx (Scotoconiopteryx) tucumana Navás, 1930
Materials examined. BRAZIL – Para• São José dos
996 Check List 17 (3)
Tab le 1. Neuroptera recorded from the state of Paraná, Brazil, and the main source of occurrence information. Genera and species
indicated with an asterisk (*) represent new records for the state of Paraná, two asterisks (**) represent new records for Brazil.
Taxo n Locality Sources
Chrysopidae
Asthenochrysa Adams & Penny, 1992 * Fênix This study
Chrysoperla externa (H agen , 1861) Rio Negro Cardoso e t al. 2003
Ceraeochrysa a cmon Penn y, 1998 Foz do Iguaç u de Freitas e t al. 2009
Chrysopodes hagenorum Tauber et al., 2012 Foz do Iguaç u Tauber et al. 2012
Leucochrysa (Nodita) intermedia (Schneider, 1851) Rio Negro Cardoso e t al. 2003
Leucochrysa (Nodita) vieirana Navás, 1913 Rio Negro Cardoso e t al. 2003
Nacarina sagitta de Freitas & Penn y, 2001* Fênix, Telêmaco Borba This study
Plesiochrysa sp. Adam s, 1982 * Fênix, Jundiaí do Su l, São José dos Pinh ais, Guarapuava . This study
Plesiochrysa brasiliensis (Schneider, 1851) * Fênix , Ponta Grossa This study
Coniopterygidae
Coniopteryx (Xeroconiopteryx) paranana Meinander, 1990 Curitiba Meinander 1990
Coniopteryx (Coniopteryx) Meinander, 1972 Curitiba Meinander 1990.
Coniopteryx (Scotoconiopteryx) tucumana Navás, 1930 * São José do s Pinhais This study
Dilaridae
Nallachius limai Adams, 1970 Piraquar a, Tijuca do Sul, Ti ról das Torres Machado and Rafael 2010b
Nallachius reductus Carpenter, 1947 ** Fênix This study
Hemerobiidae
Hemerobius bolivari Bank s, 1910 São Mateus d o Sul Lara and Per ioto 2003; Lara and Per ioto 2016
Hemerobius domingensis Bank s, 1941 Cascavel La ra and Perioto 2003; La ra and Perioto 2016
Hemerobius gaitoi Monserrat, 1996 Terra Boa Monserrat 1996
Megalomus impudicus (Gerstaecker, 1888) Paraná Lara and Per ioto 2016
Nusalala ilusionata Monserrat, 2004 Paraná Lara and Per ioto 2016
Nusalala tessellata (Gerstaecker, 1888) Casc avel, São Matheus d o Sul Lara and Freitas 20 03
Sympherobius sp. Banks, 1905 * Colombo This study
Mantispidae
Anchieta fumosella (Westwo od, 1867) Cam po Largo, Ponta Gr ossa, Fênix Carval ho and Corseuil 1991; Alvi m et al. 2019; this study
Climaciella semihyalina (Le Peletier & Audinet-Serville, 1825) Guaraúna (Teixeira Soares) Penny and da Cos ta 1983
Dicromantispa gracilis (Erichson, 1839) Colombo Machado and Rafael 2010a
Dicromantispa synapsis Ho man, 2002 Fênix, Tijuc as do Sul, Guaratu ba, Pontal do Itar aré Machado and Rafael 2010a
Entanoneura batesella (Westwood, 1867) Guaraúna (Teixeira Soares) Penny and da Cost a 1983
Gerstaeckerella gigantea Enderlein, 1910 Guaraúna (Teixeira Soares) Penn y and da Costa 1983
Gerstaeckerella irrorata (Erichson, 1839) Guaraúna (Teixeira Soares) Penny and da Cos ta 1983
Leptomantispa ariasi (P enny, 19 82) Morretes Machado and Rafael 2010a
Leptomantispa axillaris (Navás, 1908) Campo do Tenente Machado and Rafael 2010a
Paramantispa ambusta (Erichson, 1839) Ponta G rossa, Lapa Penn y and da Costa 1983
Paramantispa prolixa (Erichson, 1839) Curi tiba, Lapa, Vila Vel ha, Quatro Barr as Pen ny and da Costa 1983
Trichoscelia varia (Walker, 1853)Ponta Grossa Car valho and Corse uil 1991.
Zeugomantispa compellens (Walker, 1860) Morretes Machado and Rafael 2010a
Zeugomantispa virescens (Rambur, 1842) Jaguariaíva, Castro, Morretes, Rio Nhundiaquara Machado an d Rafael 2010a; this study
Myrmeleontidae
Amoea chloro ps (Blanchard, 1845) * Guarapuava This study
Argentoleon irrigatus Gerstae cker, 1893 * Colombo This study
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) * Fênix, Sã o José dos Pinhais , Ponta Grossa, Telêm aco
Borba
This study
Cordulecerus alopecinus (Burmeister, 1839) * Fênix This st udy
Glenurus peculiaris (Walker, 186 0) Foz do Iguaçu, Mor retes, Rolândi a Machado 2020
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) * Fênix, Antonina, Po nta Grossa, Colo mbo, São José dos
Pinhais, Guarapuava, Telêmaco Borba
This study
Myrmeleon (Myrmeleon) pallidipes Ban ks, 192 0 Jaguariaíva Navás 1923
Navasoleon brasiliensis Miller, 2018 Virmond Stang e and Miller 2018
Osmylidae
Isostenosmylus bar batus Martins , Ardila-Cama cho, Flint & Stange, 2019 Ponta Grossa, Sã o José dos Pinhais M artins et al. 2019
Isostenosmylus pulverulentus (Gerstaecker, 1894) Curitib a, Campina Grand e do Sul, Ponta Gross a, São José
dos Pinhais, Paranaguá, Quatro Barras, Prudentópolis
Martin s et al. 2019, This study
Sisyridae
Climacia insol ita Flint, 1998 Guarapuava, Prudentópolis, Telêmaco Borba Flint (1998); this stu dy
Climacia triplehorni Flint, 1998 * Guarapuava, Telêmaco Borba, Ponta Grossa This study
Sisyra apicalis Bank s, 1908 * Guarapuava, Telêmaco Borba This study
Schuster and Machado | Neuroptera (Insecta) of the PROFAUPAR project 997
Pinhais, Serra do Mar BR 277 km 54; 25°34′00ʺS, 049°
01′0 0ʺW; 02.XII.1986; 1♀ and 1 ♂; DZUP 381709; RC
Marinoni and RRC Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR.
Identi cation. This species is distinguished from other
Brazilian species by the combination of characters pre-
sented in the identication key of Martins and Amorim
(2016): hind wing with radial posterior (RP) vein branch-
ing from the radial anterior (RA) vein near the middle of
wing length, and M unforked; head without a protruding
projection; in males gonocoxite 9 sickle-like.
Comments. Prior to this work, only two species of co-
niopterygids were reported from Paraná: Coniopteryx
(Scotoconiopteryx) paranana Meinander, 1990 and Co-
niopteryx (Coniopteryx) simplicior Meinander, 1972.
Updated distribution in Brazil: Ceará, Pará, Paraná,
Santa Catarina.
Family Dilaridae Newman, 1853
Subfamily Nallachiinae Navás, 1914
Genus Nallachius Navás, 1909
Nallachius reductus Carpenter, 1947
Material examined. BRAZIL – Para • Fênix, Re-
serva Estd. de Vila Rica (ITCF); 23°54′51ʺS, 051°57
45ʺW; 02.XII.1986, 2 ♂; DZUP 381750; RC Marinoni
and RRC Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR.
Identi cation. This species is similar to Nallachius pre-
stoni (McLachlan, 1880) but can be dierentiated by the
longer gonostyli 10 and much lighter wing marks (Car-
penter 1970); in addition, N. prestoni is recorded in Bra-
zil only from Rio de Janeiro state. Nallachius reductus
is also similar to N. potiguar Machado & Rafael, 2010,
which can be distinguished by its unforked costal cross-
vein and geographical distribution (Machado and Rafael
2010b).
Comments. Nallachius reductus was previously report-
ed only from Paraguay. The only Nallachius species pre-
viously known from Paraná was N. limai Adams, 1970
(Machado and Martins 2021).
Updated distribution in Brazil: Paraná.
Family Hemerobiidae Latreille, 1802
Subfamily Sympherobiinae Comstock, 1918
Genus Sympherobius Banks, 1905
Sympherobius sp.
Material examined. BRAZIL - Para • Colombo,
Embrapa BR 476 KM 20; 25°20′00ʺS, 049°14′00ʺW;
27.III.19872; 1 ♂; DZUP 381707; RC Marinoni and RRC
Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR.
Identi cation. This genus is distinguished from the
other Brazilian genera by the presence of two RP in the
forewing, with the rst RP branching before the origin
of the second RP. Additionally, forewing is not “beaded”
along the longitudinal veins (Penny and Monserrat 1983).
Comments. Four species of Sympherobius occur in
Brazil, and only one species from southern Brazil was
reported prior to this study: Sympherobius gayi Navás,
1910 from Rio Grande do Sul state (Lara and Perioto
2016 ).
Updated distribution in Brazil: Paraná.
Family Myrmeleontidae Latreille, 1802 (sensu Machado
et al. 2019)
Subfamily Ascalaphinae Lefèbvre, 1842
Tribe Haplogleniini Newman, 1853
Genus Amoea Lefebvre, 1842
Amoea chlorops (Blanchard, 1845)
Material examined. BRAZIL – Paraná • Antonina,
Reserva Sapitanduva; 25°28′00ʺS, 048°50′00ʺW; 30.XI.
1986; 1 ♂; DZUP 381643; RC Marinoni and RRC Dutra
leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR.
Identi cation. According to Penny (1981), the genus
Amoea is characterized by having the eyes not divided
transversely, the antennae longer than the distance to
the second RP fork on the forewing, and the hind wing
with 2A absent or extremely short. According to van der
Weele (1908), A. chlorops is quite similar to A. immacu-
lata (Olivier, 1790), but A. chlorops can be distinguished
from the latter species based on its smaller size, uncon-
structed wings tip, yellow or brownish subcostal eld,
and the geographic distribution (van der Weele 1908;
Machado and Martins 2021).
Comments. Four species of this genus occur in Brazil
(Machado and Martins 2021). Penny (1981) pointed out
the need for a taxonomic revision of the group, which is
still necessary.
Updated distribution in Brazil. Bahia, Espírito Santo,
Paraná, Rio de Janeiro, Santa Catarina.
Genus Haploglenius Burmeister, 1839
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839)
Material exami ned. BRAZIL - Paraná • Fênix, Reserva
Estadual Vila Rica (ITCF); 23°54′5S, 051°57′45ʺW;
?.?.1986, 04.X.1986, 02.XI.1986, 03.XI.1986, 29.XI.1986,
30.XI.1986, 02.XII.1986, ?.?.1987; 6 and 3 ♂; DZUP
381659, DZUP 381662, DZUP 381675, DZUP 381662,
DZUP 381678, DZUP 381676, DZUP 381660; RC Ma-
rinoni and RRC Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR
Telêmaco Borba, Reserva Biológica Klabin; 24°17′00ʺS,
050°37′00ʺW; 07.I.1987; 1 ; DZUP 381663; RC Ma-
rinoni and RRC Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR
Po nt a Gr o s s a , Vi la Vel h a res. IA PAR BR 376; 21302ʺS,
050°02′14ʺW; 01.I.1987, 26.I.1987, 27.I.1987, 29.I.1987,
30.I.1987, 31.I.1987, 27.II.1987; 5 and 3 ♂; DZUP
381661, DZUP 381664, DZUP 381665, DZUP 381668,
DZUP 381671, DZUP 381672, DZUP 381666; RC Ma-
rinoni and RRC Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR
Guarapuava, Estan. Águas de Santa Clara; 25°40′00ʺS,
0501′00 ʺW: 28.III.1987; 1 and 1 ♂; DZUP 381667,
DZUP 3816924; RC Marinoni and RRC Dutra leg.; light
trap; PROFAUPAR • Antonina, Reserva Sapitanduva;
25°28′00ʺS, 048°50′00ʺW; 29.XII.1986, 28.II.1987; 2 ♀;
998 Check List 17 (3)
DZUP 381674, DZUP 381673; RC Marinoni and R RC Du-
tra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR • São José do Pinhais,
Serra do Mar BR 277 km 54; 25°34′00ʺS, 049 °01′00ʺW;
30.I.1987; 1♀; DZUP 381670; RC Marinoni and RRC Du-
tra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR • Colombo, Embrapa
BR 476 km 20; 25°20′00ʺS, 049°14′00ʺW; 30.I.1987; 1 ♂;
DZUP 381669; RC Marinoni and RRC Dutra leg.; light
trap; PROFAUPAR.
Identi cation. Haploglenius is a distinctive genus char-
acterized by the generally dark anterior wing costal area,
hind wing with 2A long, and a pronotal ap in the males
(Penny 1981; Eisner and Adams 1975). Haploglenius
costatus can be identied in that the hind margin of fore-
wing has the anal projection slightly developed with a
concave intrusion, and the wings have brown costal ar-
eas (Ábrahám 2013).
Comments. Haploglenius costatus was the most col-
lected species of Ascalaphinae in this study. Currently
ve species are known to Brazil, and H. costatus also oc-
curs in several other Neotropical countries and is wide-
spread in Brazil, with records in the north, northeast,
and central-west regions (Machado and Martins 2021);
herein, we provide the rst known occurrences in the
southern region of Brazil.
Updated distribution in Brazil. Amazonas, Bahia, Mato
Grosso, Rondônia, Tocantins, Pará, Paraná.
Tribe Ululodini Van der Weele, 1908
Genus Ascalorphne Banks, 1915
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839)
Material examined. BRAZIL – Para • PR, Anto-
nina, Reserva Sapitanduva; 25°28′00ʺS, 048°50′00ʺW;
30.XII.1986, 31.I.1987, 32.I.1987, 26.II.1987, 27.III.1987,
28.III.1987; 4 ♀ and 3 ♂; DZUP 381654-381656, DZUP
381648, DZUP 381644, DZUP 381652; RC Marinoni
and RRC Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR • Fênix,
Reserva Estadual Vila Rica (ITCF); 23°54′51ʺS, 051°
57′45ʺW; 01.I.1987; 1 ♀ and 1 ♂; DZUP 38164; RC Ma-
rinoni and RRC Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR
Telêmaco Borba, Reserva Biológica Klabin; 24°17′0S,
050°37′00ʺW; 26.II.1987,27.II.1987, 28.II.1987,
01.III.1987, 27.III.1987, 29.III.1987; 6 ♀ and 1 ♂; DZUP
381647, DZUP 381657, DZUP 381651, DZUP 381646,
DZUP 381650, DZUP 381653; RC Marinoni and RRC
Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR • Ponta Grossa, Vila
Velha res. IAPAR BR 376; 25°13′02ʺS, 050°02′1W;
27.I.1987; 2 ; DZUP 381649; RC Marinoni and RRC
Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR.
Identi cation. The genus Ascalorphne is readily recog-
nized by the ver y distinctive axillary angle of the forewing
and the antennae, which are longer than the forewing. The
species is determined by the long antennae and by the
whitish, piriform antennal club (Penny 1981).
Comments. The genus Ascalorphne has four described
South American species, with two species occurring
in Brazil: A. impavida (Walker, 1853) reported from
Maranhão and Pará states, and A. macrocerca (Burmeis-
ter, 1839) from Bahia state (Penny 1981). We provide
here several new records from Paraná.
Updated distribution in Brazil. Bahia, Paraná.
Genus Cordulecerus Rambur, 1842
Cordulecerus alopecinus (Burmeister, 1839)
Material exami ned. BRAZIL – Paraná • Fênix, Reserva
Estadual Vila Rica (ITCF); 23°54′51ʺS, 051°57′45ʺW; 03.
XII.1986; 1 ♀; DZUP 381658; RC Marinoni and RRC
Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR.
Identi cation. Species of Cordulecerus are character-
ized by having trianguloid wings usually dark pigmented
and the hind wing with a sinuous CuP (Penny 1981). Cor-
dulecerus alopecinus can be distinguished by the brown
mark on the base of the hind wing and the yellow me-
sonotum with a central black mark (van der Weele 1908).
Comments. According to Ardila-Camacho et al. (2019),
six species occur in Brazil, but until now only C. subi-
ratus Walker, 1853 was known from southern region of
Brazil, from Rio Grande do Sul state (Machado and Mar-
tins 2021). Herein, we report the rst record of C. alo-
pecinus from Fênix, Paraná. The species was previously
known only from the states of Bahia, Espírito Santo, and
São Paulo in Brazil, and from Argentina (Navás 1912).
Cordulecerus alopecinus is one of the Cordulecerus spe-
cies known to have aggregation behavior, and a group
with more than 100 specimens has been reported from a
conservation area in Espírito Santo state (Gomes-Filho
2000).
Updated distribution in Brazil. Bahia, Espírito Santo,
Paraná, São Paulo.
Subfamily Myrmeleontinae Latreille, 1802
Tribe Brachynemurini Banks, 1927
Genus Argentoleon Stange, 1994
Argentoleon irrigatus (Gerstaecker, 1893)
Material examined. BRAZIL – Para • Colombo,
EMBRAPA BR 476 km 20; 25°20′00ʺS, 049°14′00ʺW;
27.III.1987; 1 ♀; DZUP 381682; RC Marinoni and RRC
Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAUPAR.
Identi cation. Argentoleon irrigatus is distinguished by
the following combination of characters: frons without
setae, antenna short, forefemoral sense hair as long as
forefemur length, forewing vein 2A running in a fairly
even curve toward 3A, and cubital anterior vein (CuA)
bending to hind margin at or before origin of medial fork.
This species diers from A. longitudinalis (Navás, 1914)
by the absence of a dark brown stripe in a mediocubital
area of the fore wing (Stange 1994).
Comments. Argentoleon irrigatus, previously unre-
ported from Paraná, is the fourth antlion species known
from the state. The genus comprises two species: A. lon-
gitudinalis, which does not occur in Brazil, and A. ir-
rigatus, with records from Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay,
Schuster and Machado | Neuroptera (Insecta) of the PROFAUPAR project 999
Uruguay, Venezuela, and Brazil (Machado and Martins
2021).
Updated distribution in Brazil. Amazonas, Minas Ge-
rais, Paraná, São Paulo.
Family Sisyridae Banks, 1905
Genus Climacia McLachlan, 1869
Climacia triplehorni Flint, 1998
Material examined. BRAZIL – Para • Guara-
puava, Estância Águas de Santa Clara; 25°40′00ʺS,
0501′00 ʺW; 04.XI.1986; 1 and 4 ♂; DZUP 381928;
RC Marinoni and RRC Dutra leg.; light trap; PROFAU-
PAR • Ponta Grossa, Vila Velha res. IAPAR BR 376;
25°13′02ʺS, 050°02′14ʺW; 04.XI.1986; 1 and 1 ♂;
DZUP 381926; RC Marinoni and RRC Dutra leg.; light
trap; PROFAUPAR • Telêmaco Borba, Reserva Biológica
Klabin; 24°17′00ʺS, 050°37′00ʺW; 31.X.1986, 05.X.1986,
27.III.1987; 4 ♀ and 1 ♂; DZUP 381927, DZUP 381929,
DZUP 381930; RC Marinoni and RRC Dutra leg.; light
trap; PROFAUPAR.
Identi cation. The genus Climacia is identied by the
subcylindrical format of the terminal segment of maxil-
lary palp and the species, and C. triplehorni is dierenti-
ated from its congeners by the presence of a conspicuous
radiomedial streak on the forewing extending longitudi-
nally but not reaching the anal margin, and also by the
absence of spots throughout longitudinal veins. It can
be dierentiated from C. insolita Flint, 1998, which is
closely related with C. triplehorni, for not having the
radiomedial streak connected to other intervenational
streaks on the forewing (Assmar and Salles 2017).
Comments. In Brazil, 11 species of Climacia have been
recorded; however, only C. insolita was previously re-
corded to Paraná state. Herein, we report only the second
species of Climacia occurring in this state.
Updated distribution in Brazil. Paraná, São Paulo,
Santa Catarina.
Genus Sisyra Burmeister, 1839
Sisyra apicalis Banks, 1908
Material examined. BRAZIL – Paraná • Guarapuava,
Estância Águas de Santa Clara; 25°40′00ʺS, 052°01′
00ʺW; 02.XII.1986, 31.III.1987; 2 ; DZUP 381711,
DZUP 381931; RC Marinoni and RRC Dutra leg.; light
trap; PROFAUPAR • Telêmaco Borba, Reserva Biológica
Klabin; 24°17′00ʺS, 050°37′00ʺW; 05.X.1987; 1 ♀ and 1
♂; DZUP 381932; RC Marinoni and RRC Dutra leg.; li-
ght trap; PROFAUPAR.
Identi cation. According to Assmar and Salles (2017),
this species can be identied by its straight, distally pro-
jected male gonocoxite 9, which has a rounded apex and
curves internally in dorsal view.
Comments. This species has a wide distribution, occur-
ring from the southern United States to Brazil. The genus
includes six Neotropical species, all occurring in Brazil
(Assmar and Salles 2017), but Sisyra has never been re-
corded in southern Brazil. Herein, we present the south-
ernmost record of the genus in the country.
Updated distribution in Brazil. Amazonas, Bahia, Es-
pírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Paraná, Pernambuco, Roraima.
Other species
Other Neuroptera families were also collected during
PROFAUPAR (Appendix, Table A1), and although they
are not newly recorded from Paraná, they are briey
discussed. Osmylidae was represented by Isostenosmy-
lus pulverulentus (Gerstaecker, 1894) (n = 4); the family
has three species reported from Brazil: Gumila adsper-
sus Navás 1912 (Santa Catarina) and the genus Isosten-
osmylus Krüger, 1913 with two species: I. pulverulentus,
most commonly collected and distributed in southeast-
ern and southern Brazil (including Paraná), and I. bar-
batus Martins, Ardila-Camacho, Flint & Stange 2019,
which was recently described from several locations in
Paraná (Martins et al. 2019). Mantispidae was repre-
sented by Zeugomantispa virescens (Rambur, 1842) (n
= 9), a widely distributed and commonly collected spe-
cies in Brazil, and Anchieta fumosella (Westwood, 1867 )
(n = 2), sampled in Ponta Grossa. These two species were
previously reported from Paraná state and represent two
of the three subfamilies that occur in Brazil, Mantispinae
and Symphrasinae, respectively. A total of 14 mantispid
species have been recorded from Paraná. The Manispi-
dae are the most diverse family of Neuroptera in the state
(Machado and Martins 2021).
Discussion
The insects collected during PROFAUPAR proved to be
diverse, highlighting the importance of large projects to
study insect biodiversity and to deepen the knowledge
of the local fauna. All families of Neuroptera known to
occurr in Brazil were found in this project, except for
Berothidae, which is represented in the country by two
species occurring only in areas of northern and central
Brazil (Machado and Krolow 2016; Lara and Perioto
2020). Including the new records of the present study—an
increase in the neuropterofauna of Paraná by 29.2%—a
total of 48 species of lacewings are now known to occur
in the state.
Although some specimens were not identied to spe-
cies, we consider the publication of these data important,
as this study is the only large-scale survey in southern
Brazil of the order Neuroptera; these data took almost
34 years to be studied and published; and little is known
about the true diversity of Neuroptera, particularly in the
South American countries like Brazil (Martins 2019).
In our study, Sisyridae and Chrysopidae were the
families that with highest abundance of specimens. Sisy-
ridae is one of the smallest neuropteran families, with 71
extant species worldwide (Oswald and Machado 2018);
nevertheless, this group was the most representative in
the PROFAUPAR samples (mainly Climacia insolita),
1000 Check List 17 (3)
with records of both extant genera in the New World,
Climacia and Sisyra. According to Assmar and Salles
(2017), these two genera have only six species in the
Atlantic rainforest, a number probably underestimated
based on our results. Chrysopidae is the second most
diverse neuropteran family in the world, with 1415 spe-
cies and 81 genera (Oswald and Machado 2018), and
it is considered the neuropteran family with the great-
est number of species in South America (Martins 2019).
However, only nine species are known from Paraná. The
identication of Chrysopidae is complex due to the mor-
phological similarity of some species, especially in the
Neotropical genera, and the absence of identication
keys for females. Therefore, in this work the Chrysopini
females were presented separately (Appendix, Table A1).
Hemerobiidae was represented by three genera in our
study; in Brazil, the family has six genera and 23 species
(Lara and Perioto 2016). Despite being relatively com-
mon in collections, the information on these insects is
scarce and further study should be encouraged, espe-
cially in connection to the importance of hemerobiids as
biological control agents in other countries (Lara et al.
2008) and still unexplored in Brazil.
Myrmeleontidae (sensu Machado et al. 2019) was
the family with the fourth highest abundance in our
study, with 46 specimens sampled. Our study is the rst
to record owlies (Myrmeleontidae, Ascalaphinae) in
Paraná. The family Ascalaphidae has recently been clas-
sied as a subfamily within Myrmeleontidae based on
molecular and morphological data (Machado et al. 2019;
Jones 2019), and it is presented here as such. Within the
Myrmeleontidae, specimens collected during the project
all belong to the former Ascalaphidae (now Myrmeleon-
tidae, Ascalaphinae) with the exception of Argentoleon
irrigatus (Myr meleontinae, Brachynemur ini). At present,
only three other species of Myrmeleontidae are recorded
in Paraná: Myrmeleon pallidipes Banks, 1920,Glenurus
peculiaris (Walker, 1860), and Navasoleon brasiliensis
Miller, 2018, which was only recently described (Stange
and Miller 2018), suggesting that the diversity of these
insects is underestimated.
Coniopterygidae was found to be the family with the
least diversity and abundance, represented only by Coni-
opteryx (S.) tucumana. This family is widely distributed
in Brazil, with 46 species and four genera known: Coni-
opteryx, Neoconis Enderlein, 1930, Semidalis Ender-
lein, 1905, and Incasemidalis Meinander, 1972; the latter
genus was only recently reported from Brazil by Martins
and Amorim (2016), which demonstrates the poor knowl-
edge of this family in the country. The least abundant
family in our study was Dilaridae, which is a rare group
of insects in entomological collections and biologically
little-known, especially the adults (Lara and Perioto
2017). The family is represented by four genera world-
wide, but Nallachius is the only genus occurring in Bra-
zil and distributed in all regional divisions of the country,
with 11 species known (Machado and Rafael 2010b).
Over the course of more than three decades, the
eight study areas have suered greatly from fragmenta-
tion, especially Antonina, Colombo, and Jundiai do Sul,
which can be seen in satellite images as green patches
surrounded by buildings and crops. The Parque Estadual
de Vila Velha (Ponta Grossa) and Parque Ecológico Sam-
uel Klabin (Telêmaco Borba) are also now surrounded
by urban areas and crops; however, they are protected
areas, either public or private, respectively. Due to urban
expansion over the years, the boundaries between cit-
ies have changed, so that the geographic coordinates of
Guarapuava study area is now located in the municipal-
ity of Foz do Jordão, but we decided to keep the name
of the collection point, as originally presented by Mari-
noni and Dutra (1991), to facilitate understanding in later
studies. We believe that new studies at these locations
may help us to understand the eects of urbanization on
the insect fauna over time.
We highlight that all the study areas are within the
Atlantic Forest, which is a biodiversity hotspot. The
Atlantic Forest is one of the Brazilian biomes most
impacted by deforestation due to agriculture and urban-
ization. Nowadays, only 12.4% of the original extent of
the Atlantic Forest remains, and despite the expansion of
protected and reforested areas, deforestation rates con-
tinue, increasing by 27% in 2018–2019 (Fundação SOS
Mata Atlântica 2020). Paraná is the state which has the
third highest contributions towards deforestation of the
Atlantic Forest. Our study, in increasing in the number of
neuropteran species known in the state and providing the
rst record of Nallachius reductus in the country, shows
the importance of projects with large temporal and geo-
graphical sampling of insects. Such projects can provide
the necessary data to better understand the Brazilian
entomofauna, especially for the neglected insect groups
like Neuroptera. According to Machado and Martins
(2021), Paraná is the ninth most diverse Brazilian state;
however, our results suggest that possibly only a fraction
of the real diversity of Neuroptera is known.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Norma Giambarese Ganho for providing
the material for the study and Dr. Renato C. Marinoni (in
memoriam) for leading the PROFAUPAR project and for
his contributions to the entomology in Paraná. We also
thank Dr. Caleb C. Martins for conrming identica-
tions and for valuable comments on the manuscript. Dr.
Adrian Ardila-Camacho, Dr. Tiago Kütter Krolow, and
Robert Forsyth provided helpful reviews and suggestions
on the manuscript. Finally, we thank the National Coun-
cil for Scientic and Technological Development (CNPq)
for the nancial support (no. 130765/2020-1).
Authors’ Contributions
Formal analysis: PAS. Writing – original draft: PAS.
Writing – review and editing: PAS, RJPM. Data cura-
tion: RJM. Supervision: RJPM.
Schuster and Machado | Neuroptera (Insecta) of the PROFAUPAR project 1001
References
Ábrahám L (2013) Ascalaphid studies IX. The genus Haploglenius
from South America (Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae). Natura Somo-
gyiensis 23: 178–188.
Adams PA (1970) A review of the New World Dilaridae. Postilla 148
(1): 1–30.
Adams PA, Penny ND (1985) Neuroptera of the Amazon Basin. Part
11a. Int roduction and Chrysopini. Acta Amazonica 15 (3– 4): 413–
480.
Alvim BGC, Machado RJP, K rolow TK (2019) Mantidies (Neurop-
tera, Mantispidae) from Tocantins state (Brazil): distribution and
identication key. Check List 15 (2): 275–285. https://doi.org/10.
15560/15.2.275
Ardila-Camacho A, Noriega JA, Acevedo-Ramos F (2019) New gen-
era records of split-eyed owlies (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae:
Ascalaphinae) from Colombia. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 59:
1–18. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2019.59.51
Aspöck U, Aspöck H (2008) Phylogenetic relevance of the geni-
tal sclerites of Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola). System-
atic Entomology 33 (1): 97–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-
3113.2007.00396.x
Assmar AC, Salles FF (2017) Taxonomic and distributional notes on
spongilla-ies (Neuroptera: Sisyridae) from southeastern Brazil
with the rst interactive key to the species of the country. Zootaxa
4273 (1): 80–92. http s://doi.org /10.11646/zoot ax a.4273.1.6
Azevedo CO, Hel mer JL , Ba rreto FCC (2006) Análise da faun a de Be-
thylidae (Hymenoptera, Chrysidoidea) de oito localidades do Pa-
raná, Brasil. Boletim do Museu de Biologia Mello Leitão (Nova
Série) 19: 83–94.
Breitkreuz LCV (2018) Systematics and evolution of the family
Chrysopidae (Neuroptera) with an emphasis on their morphology.
PhD dissertation, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Ger-
many, 690 pp.
Breitkreuz LCV, Winterton SL, Engel MS (2017) Wing tracheation in
Chrysopidae and other Neuropterida (Insecta): a resolution of the
confusion about vein fusion. American Museum Novitates 2017
(3890): 1–45. http s://doi.org /10.1206/3890.1
Cardoso JT, Lázzari SMN, Freitas SD, Iede ET (2003) Ocorrência e
utuação populacional de Chrysopidae (Neuroptera) em áreas de
plantio de Pinus taeda (L.) (Pinaceae) no Sul do Paraná. Revista
Brasilei ra de Entomologia 47 (3): 473– 475. https://doi.org/10.1590/
S0085-56262003000300019
Carpenter FM (1947) Taxonomic notes on the Dilaridae (Neuroptera).
Psyche 54: 100 –109. https://doi.org/10.1155/1947/23794
Carvalho AL, Corseuil E (1991) Representantes de Platymantispinae
(Neuroptera, Mantispidae) no Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Comu-
nicações do Museu de Ciências 4: 48–69.
Costacurta NC, Marinoni RC, Carvalho CJ (2003) Fauna de Muscidae
(Diptera) em três localidades do estado do Paraná, Brasil, captu-
rada por armadilha Malaise. Revista Brasilei ra de Entomologia 47
(3): 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262003000300005
de Freitas S, Penny ND, Adams PA (2009) A revision of the New world
genus Ceraeochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Proceedings of
the California Academy of Sciences 60: 503-610.
Eisner T, Adams PA (1975) Startle behavior in an ascalaphid (Neurop-
tera). Psyche 82: 304–305.
Fernandes FR, Linzmeier AM (2012) Tortoise beetles (Coleoptera,
Chrysomelidae, Cassidinae) captured with malaise traps on PRO-
FAUPAR and PROVIVE projects (Paraná, south Brazil). Check
List 8 (6): 1225–1231. https://doi.o rg /10.15560/8.6.1225
Flint OS (1998) New species and records of Climacia from the neo-
tropics (Neuroptera, Sisyridae). Acta Zoologica Fennica 209:
107–118.
Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica (2020) https://www.sosma.org.br/so-
bre/relatorios-e-balancos. Relatório anual 2019. Accessed on:
2021-04-03.
Gomes-Filho A (2000) Aggregation behavior in the Neotropical owl-
y Cordulecerus alopecinus (Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae). Journal
of the New York Entomological Society 108: 304–313. http s://doi.
org/10.1664/0028-7199(2000)108[0304:ABITNO]2.0.CO;2
Jones JR (2019) Total‐evidence phylogeny of the owlies (Neuroptera,
Ascalaphidae) supports a new higher‐level classication. Zoolo-
gica Scripta 48 (6): 761–782. ht t p s: //do i.org /10.1111/zs c.12 38 2
Lara RIR, Freitas SD (2003) Caracterização morfológica de espécies
de Hemerobius Linnaeus, 1758 (Neuroptera, Hemerobiidae) as-
sociadas a cultivos de café (Coea arabica L.), milho (Zea mays
L.) e erva-mate (Ilex paraguariensis St. Hill.). Revista Brasileira
de Entomologia 47 (3): 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-
56262003000300011
Lara RIR, Perioto NW (2016) Updated checklist of Hemerobiidae
(Neuroptera) from Brazil and new distributional records in the
neotropical region. Acta Amazonica 46 (4): 425432. https://doi.
org/10.1590/1809-4392201600883
Lara RI, Perioto NW (2017) New records of pleasing lacewings (Neu-
roptera , Dilaridae) from São Paulo state, Brazil. Check List 13 (6):
857. ht tps://doi.org/10.15560/13.6.857
Lara RIR, Perioto NW (2020) New records of Berothidae (Insecta:
Neuroptera) from central Brazil. Revista Chilena de Entomolo-
gía 46 (1): 21–29.
Lara R IR, Freitas SD, Perioto N W, Pa z CCPD (2008) Amostragem, di-
versidade e sazonalidade de Hemerobiidae (Neuroptera) em Cof-
fea arabica L. cv. Obatã (Rubiaceae). Revista Brasileira de Ento-
mologia 52 (1): 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262008
000100020
Machado, RJP (2020) Rediscovery of Glenurus incalis Banks (Neu-
roptera: Myrmeleontidae), and notes on the Brazilian species
of Glenurus Hagen. Zootaxa 4858 (1): 135–143. ht tps://doi.
org/10.11646/zootaxa.4858.1.10
Machado RJP, Krolow TK (2016) A new species of Spiroberotha Ad-
ams 1989 (Neuroptera: Berothidae) and the rst record of the ge-
nus in Brazil. Zootaxa 4093 (1): 127–134. http://doi.org/10.11646/
zootaxa.4093.1.8
Machado RJP, Martins CC (2021) Neuroptera in catálogo taxonô-
mico da fauna do Brasil. PNU D. http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/fauna/
faunadobrasil/146. Accessed on: 2021-03-22.
Machado RJP, Rafael JA (2010a) Taxonomy of the brazilian species
previously placed in Mant ispa Illiger, 1798 (Neuroptera: Mantis-
pidae), with the description of three new species. Zootaxa 2454
(1): 1–61. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2454.1.1
Machado RJP, Rafael JA (2010b) Two new species of Dilaridae (In-
secta: Neu roptera) with add itional notes on bra zilian specie s. Zoo-
taxa 2421 (1): 61–68. ht tps://doi.org/10.11646/zoota xa .2421.1.5
Machado RJP, Tavares LGM (2020) Notes on the Brazilian species of
Purenleon Stange (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae), with descrip-
tion of two new species. Insect Systematics and Evolution 51 (1):
62–80. https://doi.org/10.1163/1876312X-00002200
Machado RJP, Gillung JP, Winterton SL, Garzón‐Orduña IJ, Lem-
mon AR, Lemmon EM, Oswald JD (2019) Owlies are derived
antlions: anchored phylogenomics supports a new phylogeny and
classication of Myrmeleontidae (Neuroptera). Systematic Ento-
mology 44 (2): 418–450. ht tps://d oi.or g /10.1111/s ye n .1233 4
Marinoni L, Almeida GLD (2000) Abundância e sazonalidade das
espécies de Hydropsychidae (Insecta, Trichoptera) capturadas
em armadilha luminosa no estado do Paraná, Brasil. Revista
Brasileira de Zoologia 17 (1): 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1590/
S0101-81752000000100025
Marinoni RC, Dutra RRC (1991) Levantamento da fauna entomoló-
gica no estado do Paraná. I. Introdução. Situações climática e o-
rística de oito pontos de coleta. Dados faunísticos de agosto de
1986 a julho de 1987. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 8 (1): 31–73.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751991000100005
Marinoni RC, Dutra RRC (1996) Levantamento da fauna entomoló-
gica no estado do Paraná: II. Ctenuchidae (Lepidoptera). Revista
Brasileira de Zoologia 13 (2): 435–461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/
S0101-81751996000200014.
1002 Check List 17 (3)
Marinoni RC, Dutra RRC, Casagrande MM (1997) Levantamento da
fauna entomológica no estado do Paraná III: Saturniidae (Lepi-
doptera). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 14 (2): 473–495. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751997000200016
Mar inoni RC, Dutra RRC, Mielke OHH (1999) Levantamento da
fauna entomológica no estado do Paraná. IV. Sphingidae (Le-
pidoptera): diversidade alfa e estrutura de comunidade. Revista
Brasileira Zoologia 16 (2): 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1590/
S010181751999000600023
Mart ins, CC (2019) Neuropterida from South America: large diversity,
largely unknown. In: Proceedings of the XIII International Sym-
posium of Neuropterology, Wolnzach, Germany,154–161. htt ps://
doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3572321
Martins CC, Amorim DS (2015) First record of pleasing lacewings
(Neuroptera: Dilaridae) in São Paulo state, Brazil. Check List 11
(1): 1–3. htt ps://doi.or g/10.15560/11.1.1538
Martins CC, Amorim DS (2016) Brazilian dustywings (Neuroptera:
Coniopterygidae): new species of Incasemidalis Meinander, 1972
and Coniopteryx Curtis, 1834, checklist and key for the brazil-
ian species. Zootaxa 4083 (2): 257–289. https://doi.org/10.11646/
zootaxa.4083.2.6
Martins CC, Ardila-Camacho A, Machado RJP, Flint OS, Stange L
(2019) Unravelling the most diverse lance lacewing genus from
the new world, Isostenosmylus Krüger (Neuroptera: Osmylidae).
Invertebrate Systematics 33 (6): 849–891. http s://doi.org/10.1071/
IS18079
Meinander M (1990) The Coniopterygidae (Neuroptera, Planipennia):
a check-list of the spe cies of the world, descriptions of new species
and other new data. Acta Zoologica Fennica 189: 1–95.
Meinander M, Penny ND (1982) Neuroptera of the Amazon basin. Part
5. Coniopterygidae. Acta Amazonica 12 (1): 185–208. ht tps://doi.
org/10.1590/1809 -43921982121185
Monserrat VJ (1996) Revisión del género Hemerobius de latinoamé-
rica (Neuroptera, Hemerobiidae. Fragmenta Entomologica 27 (2)
399–523.
Navás L (1912) Sinopsis de los Ascaládos (Ins. Neur.). Arxius de
l’Institut de Ciències, Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Secció de Cièn-
cies 1: 45–143.
Navás L (1923) Quelques insectes de l’Amérique mér idionale. Annale s
de la Société Scientique de Bruxelles 43: 249–254.
Oswald JD, Machado RJP (2018) Biodiversity of the neuropterida (In-
secta: Neuroptera, Megaloptera, and Raphidioptera). Volume 1.
In: Foottit RG, Adler PH (Eds.) Insect biodiversity: science and
society. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 627–671. ht tps://doi.
or g /10.100 2/9 7811189 45582. ch21
Penny ND (1981) Review of the generic level classication of the new
world Ascalaphidae (Neuroptera). Acta Amazonica 11(2): 391–
406. ht tps://doi.or g/10.1590/1809- 439 21982121209
Penny ND, da Costa CA (1983) Mantispídeos do Brasil (Neurop-
tera: Mantispidae). Acta Amazonica 13 (3): 601–687. https://doi.
org/10.1590/1809-439219831334601
Penny ND, Monserrat VJ (1983) Neuroptera of the amazon basin Part
10. Hemerobiidae. Acta Amazonica 13 (5–6): 879–909. http s://
doi.org/10.1590/1809-439219831356879
Ribeiro-Costa CS (2000) Desc rições de sete novas espécies bra sileiras
de Amblycerus Thunberg (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Revista Bra-
sileira de Zoologia 17 (2): 323–338. http s://doi.org/0.1590/S0101-
81752000000200003
Shorthouse DP (2010) Simplemappr. https://www.simplemappr.net.
Accessed on: 2020-5-4.
Silva MSB, Freire CC (2015) First record of Argentoleon irrigatus
(Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae) from Minas Gerais, Brazil. Re-
vista Colombiana de Entomología 41 (2): 278–279.
Stange LA (1994) Reclassication of the New World antlion genera
formerly included in the tribe brachynemurini (Neuroptera: Myr-
meleontidae). Insecta Mundi 8 (1–2): 67–119.
Stange LA (2010) Preliminary report on the Myrmeleontidae (Neu-
roptera) of Paraguay. Insecta Mundi 0114: 1–14.
Stange LA, Miller RB (2018) A revision of the genus Navaso-
leon Banks (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae: Nemoleontini). In-
secta Mundi 0619: 1–25.
Tauber CA, Tauber MJ, Albuquerque GS (2001) Plesiochrysa brasil-
iensis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): larval stages, biology, and
taxonomic relationships. Annals of the Entomological Soci-
ety of America 94 (6): 858–865. htt ps://doi.org/10.1603/0013-
8746(2001)094[0858:pbncls]2.0.co;2
Tauber CA, Albuquerque GS, Tauber MJ (2012) Three new Brazilian
species of Chrysopodes (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Annals of the
Entomological Society of America 105 (5): 638–663. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1603/AN12028
Tauber CA (2019) South American Nothochrysinae (Neurop-
tera, Chrysopidae): I. Description of Nothochrysa ehrenbergi
sp. nov. ZooKeys 866: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.866.
35394
Turcatel M, Carvalho CJBD, Rafael JA (2007) Mutucas (Diptera: Ta-
banidae) do estado do Paraná, Brasil: chave de identicação pic-
tórica para subfamílias, tribos e gêneros. Biota Neotropica 7 (2):
265–278. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032007000200029
van der Weele HW (1908) Ascalaphiden. Collections zoologiques du
Baron Edm. de Selys Longchamps, Catalogue Systématique et
Descriptif. Volume 8. Hayez, Brussels, 326 pp.
Appendix
Table A1. Neuroptera (Insecta) collected by the PROFAUPAR project (1986–1987).
Taxo n Locality Date Sex nMethod Voucher n o.
Myrmelontidae
Argentoleon irrigatus Gerstae cker, 1893 Embrapa BR 476 KM 202 (Colombo/ PR) 27 iii 1987 F 1 light trap DZUP 38 1682
Amoea chloro ps (Blanchard, 1845) Reser va Sapitanduv a (Antonina/PR) 30 xi 1986 M 1 light trap DZUP 3816 43
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Sapitanduv a (Antonina/PR) 27 iii 1987 M 1 light t rap DZUP 38 1644
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Estd. de Vila Ri ca (ITCF) (Fênix/ PR) 01 i 1987 M 1 light trap DZUP 3 81645
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Estd. de Vila Ri ca (ITCF) (Fênix/ PR) 01 i 1987 F 1 li ght trap DZU P 381645
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reserva Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 01 iii 1987 F 2 light trap DZUP 3816 46
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reserva Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 26 ii 1987 F 2 light trap DZUP 381647
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Sapitanduv a (Antonina/PR) 26 ii 1987 F 1 lig ht trap DZUP 381648
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Vila Velha res . IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Grossa/ PR) 27 i 1987 M 2 light tr ap DZUP 38 1649
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reserva Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 27 iii 1987 F 1 light trap DZUP 381650
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reserva Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 28 ii 1987 M 1 li ght trap DZU P 381651
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Sapitanduv a (Antonina/PR) 28 iii 1987 F 2 light tra p DZUP 3816 52
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reserva Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 29 iii 1987 F 1 light trap DZUP 381653
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Sapitanduv a (Antonina/PR) 30 xii 1986 M 1 lig ht trap DZU P 381654
Schuster and Machado | Neuroptera (Insecta) of the PROFAUPAR project 1003
Taxo n Locality Date Sex nMethod Voucher n o.
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Sapitanduv a (Antonina/PR) 31 i 1987 M 1 light trap DZUP 3 81655
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Sapitanduv a (Antonina/PR) 32 i 1987 F 1 lig ht trap DZUP 381656
Ascalorphne macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839) Reserva Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 27 ii 1987 M 1 light tr ap DZUP 3 81657
Cordulecerus alopecinus (Burmeister, 1839) R eserva Es td. de Vila Rica (ITCF ) (Fênix/PR) 03 xi i 1986 F 1 lig ht trap DZUP 381658
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Estd. de Vila Ri ca (ITCF) (Fênix/ PR) ? ? 1986 M 1 light tr ap DZUP 3 81659
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Estd. de Vila Ri ca (ITCF) (Fênix/ PR) ? ? 1987 F 1 light trap DZUP 3816 60
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Vila Velha res . IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Grossa/ PR) 01 i 1987 F 1 light trap DZUP 38 1661
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Estd. de Vila Ri ca (ITCF) (Fênix/ PR) 03 xi 1986 F 1 li ght trap DZU P 381662
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Estd. de Vila Ri ca (ITCF) (Fênix/ PR) 04 x 1986 F 1 light tra p DZUP 3816 62
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Reserva Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 07 i 1987 M 1 lig ht trap DZUP 381663
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Vila Velha res . IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Grossa/ PR) 26 i 1987 F 1 light trap D ZUP 38166 4
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Vila Velha res . IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Grossa/ PR) 27 i 1987 F 2 light trap DZUP 3816 65
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Vila Velha res . IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Grossa/ PR) 27 ii 1987 M 1 light trap DZUP 381666
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Estan. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 28 i ii 1987 F 1 ligh t trap DZUP 381667
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Vila Velha res . IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Grossa/ PR) 29 i 1987 M 1 light tr ap DZUP 381668
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Embrapa BR 476 KM 2 02 (Colombo/PR) 30 i 1987 M 1 light t rap DZUP 3 81669
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Serra do Ma r BR 277 km 54 (São José do s Pinhais/PR) 30 i 1987 F 1 light trap DZUP 381670
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Vila Velha res . IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Grossa/ PR) 30 i 1987 F 1 light trap DZUP 381671
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Vila Velha res . IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Grossa/ PR) 31 i 1987 M 1 light trap DZU P 381672
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Sapitanduv a (Antonina/PR) 28 ii 1987 F 1 lig ht trap DZUP 381673
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Sapitanduv a (Antonina/PR) 29 xii 1986 F 1 light tr ap DZUP 381674
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Estd. de Vila Ri ca (ITCF) (Fênix/ PR) 02 xi 1986 M 1 light trap DZU P 381675
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Estd. de Vila Ri ca (ITCF) (Fênix/ PR) 02 xii 1986 F 1 light tra p DZUP 381676
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Estd. de Vila Ri ca (ITCF) (Fênix/ PR) 29 xi 1986 F 2 li ght trap DZUP 381677
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Reser va Estd. de Vila Ri ca (ITCF) (Fênix/ PR) 30 xi 1986 M 1 light trap DZU P 381678
Haploglenius costatus (Burmeister, 1839) Estan. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 2 3 xi 1986 M 1 light trap DZ UP 381924
Osmylidae
Isostenosmylus pulverulentus (Gerstaecker, 1894) Serra do Mar BR 277 km 54 (S ão José dos Pinhai s/PR) 02 x ii 1986 M 1 l ight trap DZUP 381679
Isostenosmylus pulverulentus (Gerstaecker, 1894) Serra do Mar BR 277 km 54 (S ão José dos Pinhai s/PR) 02 xi 1986 M 1 ligh t trap DZUP 381680
Isostenosmylus pulverulentus (Gerstaecker, 1894) Serra do Mar BR 277 km 54 (S ão José dos Pinhai s/PR) 02 xi 1986 F 1 light t rap DZUP 3 81680
Isostenosmylus pulverulentus (Gerstaecker, 1894) Estan. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 28 iii 1987 M 1 ligh t trap DZUP 3816 81
Dilaridae light trap
Nallachius reductus Carpenter, 1947 Reser va Estd. de Vila R ica (ITCF) (Fênix /PR) 02 xii 1986 M 2 ligh t trap DZUP 381750
Mantispidae
Anchieta fumosella (Westwo od, 1867) Vila Velha res. I APAR BR 376 (Ponta Grossa/PR) 01 i 1987 M 1 light t rap DZUP 381683
Anchieta fumosella (Westwo od, 1867) Vila Velha res. I APAR BR 376 (Ponta Grossa/PR) 02 i 1987 M 1 light t rap DZUP 3 81684
Zeugomantispa virescens (Rambur, 1842) Fazenda Monte Ver de (Jundiaí do Sul /PR) 04 viii 1986 F 1 light t rap DZUP 381685
Zeugomantispa virescens (Rambur, 1842) Fazenda Monte Ver de (Jundiaí do Sul /PR) 21 iii 1987 M 1 li ght trap DZU P 381686
Zeugomantispa virescens (Rambur, 1842) Fazenda Monte Ver de (Jundiaí do Sul /PR) 27 iii 1987 M 2 li ght trap DZU P 381687
Zeugomantispa virescens (Rambur, 1842) Estan. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 2 8 ii 1987 M 1 li ght trap DZU P 381688
Zeugomantispa virescens (Rambur, 1842) Fazenda Monte Ver de (Jundiaí do Sul /PR) 29 iii 1987 F 2 ligh t trap DZUP 381689
Zeugomantispa virescens (Rambur, 1842) Vila Velha res . IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Grossa/ PR) 30 i 1987 M 1 light trap DZ UP 381690
Zeugomantispa virescens (Rambur, 1842) Reser va Sapitanduv a (Antonina/PR) 31 i 1987 M 1 l ight trap DZ UP 381691
Hemerobiidae
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 V ila Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gr ossa/PR) 27 ii 1987 M 5 lig ht trap DZUP 3 81692
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 V ila Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gr ossa/PR) 27 ii 1987 F 7 light tr ap DZUP 381692
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 V ila Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gr ossa/PR) 01 i 1987 M 4 light trap DZU P 381693
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 V ila Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gr ossa/PR) 02 i 1987 M 5 light trap DZ UP 381694
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 V ila Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gr ossa/PR) 02 i 1987 F 2 lig ht trap DZU P 381694
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 S erra do Mar BR 277 km 54 (S ão José dos Pinha is/PR) 02 x ii 1986 F 2 lig ht trap DZU P 381695
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 E mbrapa BR 476 KM 202 (Colombo/ PR) 03 viii 1986 F 1 light tr ap DZUP 3 81696
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 V ila Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gr ossa/PR) 04 xi 1986 M 4 light trap DZ UP 381697
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 V ila Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gr ossa/PR) 04 xi 1986 F 1 ligh t trap DZU P 381697
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 V ila Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gr ossa/PR) 27 ii 1987 M 5 lig ht trap DZUP 381698
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 V ila Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gr ossa/PR) 27 ii 1987 F 7 light tr ap DZUP 381698
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 V ila Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gr ossa/PR) 30 i 1987 F 1 lig ht trap DZU P 381699
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 V ila Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gr ossa/PR) 31 i 1987 F 2 li ght trap DZU P 381699
Hemerobius sp. Linnaeus, 1758 Faz enda Monte Verde (Ju ndiaí do Sul/PR) 31 iii 1987 F 1 light tr ap DZU P 38170 0
Nusalala sp. Navás, 1913 Vila Velh a res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gross a/PR) 27 ii 1987 M 1 light trap DZUP 381701
Nusalala sp. Navás, 1913 Embr apa BR 476 KM 202 (Colombo/PR) 01 xi 1986 F 1 light t rap DZU P 38170 2
Nusalala sp. Navás, 1913 Embr apa BR 476 KM 202 (Colombo/PR) 03 viii 1986 M 1 lig ht trap DZ UP 3817 03
Nusalala sp. Navás, 1913 Vila Velh a res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gross a/PR) 27 ii 1987 M 1 light trap DZUP 3 81704
Nusalala sp. Navás, 1913 Fazend a Monte Verde (Jundi aí do Sul/PR) 27 iii 1987 F 1 light trap DZU P 381705
1004 Check List 17 (3)
Taxo n Locality Date Sex nMethod Voucher n o.
Nusalala sp. Navás, 1913 Fazend a Monte Verde (Jundi aí do Sul/PR) 29 iii 1987 F 1 light trap DZUP 381706
Sympherobius sp. Banks, 1905 Embrapa BR 476 KM 2 02 (Colombo/PR) 27 iii 1987 M 1 light trap DZUP 3 81707
Coniopterygidae
Coniopteryx sp. Curtis, 183 4 S erra do Mar BR 277 km 54 (S ão José dos Pinhai s/PR) 04 xi 1986 F 1 light tr ap DZU P 38170 8
Coniopteryx (Scotoconiopteryx) tucumana Navás, 1930 Serra do Mar BR 277 km 54 (Sã o José dos Pinhais /PR) 02 xii 198 6 F 1 ligh t trap DZU P 38170 9
Coniopteryx (Scotoconiopteryx) tucumana Navás, 1930 Serra do Mar BR 277 km 54 (Sã o José dos Pinhais /PR) 02 xii 198 6 M 1 lig ht trap DZ UP 3817 09
Sisyridae
Climacia insol ita Flint, 1998 Est an. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 29 xi 1986 M 7 light trap DZUP 381710
Climacia insol ita Flint, 1998 Est an. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 29 xi 1986 F 12 light trap DZU P 381710
Climacia insol ita Flint, 1998 Est an. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 02 xi 1986 M 22 light trap D ZUP 38 1712
Climacia insol ita Flint, 1998 Est an. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 02 xi 1986 F 17 light trap DZU P 381712
Climacia insol ita Flint, 1998 Reserv a Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 31 x 1986 M 1 light trap DZU P 381925
Climacia insol ita Flint, 1998 Reserv a Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 31 x 1986 F 1 lig ht trap DZUP 3 81925
Climacia triplehorni Flint, 1998 Vil a Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gros sa/PR) 04 xi 1986 M 1 li ght trap DZU P 381926
Climacia triplehorni Flint, 1998 Vil a Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gros sa/PR) 04 xi 1986 F 1 light t rap DZUP 381926
Climacia triplehorni Flint, 1998 Reser va Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 27 iii 1987 F 1 ligh t trap DZUP 3 81927
Climacia triplehorni Flint, 1998 Est an. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 04 xi 1986F F 1 ligh t trap DZUP 3 81928
Climacia triplehorni Flint, 1998 Est an. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 04 xi 1986F M 4 l ight trap DZ UP 381928
Climacia triplehorni Flint, 1998 Reser va Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 31 x 1986 F 1 ligh t trap DZUP 3 81929
Climacia triplehorni Flint, 1998 Reser va Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 31 x 1986 M 1 li ght trap DZU P 381929
Climacia triplehorni Flint, 1998 Reser va Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 05 x 1986 F 2 li ght trap DZU P 381930
Sisyra apicalis Bank s, 1908 Estan. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 02 xii 1986 M 1 l ight trap DZU P 3817 11
Sisyra apicalis Bank s, 1908 Estan. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 31 iii 1987 M 1 light t rap DZUP 3 81931
Sisyra apicalis Bank s, 1908 Reserva Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 05 x 1986 M 1 ligh t trap DZUP 3 81932
Sisyra apicalis Bank s, 1908 Reserva Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 05 x 1986 F 1 light tra p DZUP 381932
Chrysopidae
Asthenochrysa sp. Adams & Penny, 1992 Res erva Estd. d e Vila Rica (ITCF) (Fên ix/PR) 02 xi 1986 F 1 light tr ap DZU P 381713
Chrysoperla sp. Steinmann, 1964 Vila Velh a res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gross a/PR) 30 i 1987 M 2 lig ht trap DZ UP 3817 14
Chrysoperla sp. Steinmann, 1964 Vila Velh a res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gross a/PR) 02 i 1987 F 1 light tr ap DZU P 381715
Chrysoperla sp. Steinmann, 1964 Vila Velh a res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gross a/PR) 02 i 1987 M 3 lig ht trap DZ UP 3817 15
Chrysoperla sp. Steinmann, 1964 Vila Velh a res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gross a/PR) 27 i 1987 M 2 lig ht trap DZ UP 3817 16
Chrysoperla sp. Steinmann, 1964 Vila Velh a res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gross a/PR) 01 i 1987 M 1 lig ht trap DZ UP 3817 17
Chrysopini sp. Schneider, 1851 Re serva Estd . de Vila Rica (ITCF) (Fê nix/PR) 28 iii 1987 F 1 light tra p DZU P 381718
Chrysopini sp. Schneider, 1851 Est an. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 29 xi 1986 F 1 light trap DZU P 381719
Chrysopini sp. Schneider, 1851 Se rra do Mar BR 277 km 54 (Sã o José dos Pinhais /PR) 02 xi i 1986 F 1 ligh t trap DZUP 381720
Chrysopini sp. Schneider, 1851 Reser va Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 29 iii 1987 F 1 ligh t trap DZ UP 3817 21
Chrysopini sp. Schneider, 1851 Reser va Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 01 xi 198 6 F 1 light t rap DZU P 38172 2
Chrysopini sp. Schneider, 1851 Re serva Estd . de Vila Rica (ITCF) (Fê nix/PR) ? xi 1986 F 1 light tra p DZUP 381723
Chrysopini sp. Schneider, 1851 Re serva Estd . de Vila Rica (ITCF) (Fê nix/PR) 02 xi 1986 F 4 light t rap DZU P 38172 3
Chrysopini sp. Schneider, 1851 Se rra do Mar br 277 km 54 (S ão José dos Pinhai s/PR) 04 xi 1986 F 5 li ght trap D ZUP 38 1724
Chrysopini sp. Schneider, 1851 Fazen da Monte Verde (Jund iaí do Sul/PR) 29 iii 1987 F 1 light tra p DZUP 381725
Chrysopini sp. Schneider, 1851 Vil a Velha res. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Gro ssa/PR) 04 xi 1986 F 1 light t rap DZU P 38172 6
Chrysopini sp. Schneider, 1851 Re serva Estd . de Vila Rica (ITCF) (Fê nix/PR) 02 xi 1986 F 4 light t rap DZUP 381734
Chrysopini sp. Schneider, 1851 Se rra do Mar BR 277 km 54 (Sã o José dos Pinhais /PR) 04 xi 1986 M 1 ligh t trap DZUP 381736
Chrysopini sp. Schneider, 1851 Re serva Estd . de Vila Rica (ITCF) (Fê nix/PR) 02 xi 1986 M 1 lig ht trap DZUP 381737
Chrysopodes sp. Navás, 1913 Estan. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 2 8 ii 1987 F 1 ligh t trap DZ UP 38172 7
Chrysopodes sp. Navás, 1913 Reser va Estd. de Vila Ri ca (ITCF) (Fênix/ PR) 02 xi 1986 F 1 li ght trap DZUP 381728
Chrysopodes sp. Navás, 1913 Fazenda Monte Ver de (Jundiaí do Sul /PR) 27 iii 1987 M 1 li ght trap DZUP 381729
Chrysopodes sp. Navás, 1913 Vila Velha res . IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Grossa/ PR) 04 xi 1986 F 1 l ight trap DZUP 381730
Chrysopodes (Chryso podes) sp. Navás, 1913 Estan. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 02 xi i 1986 M 1 li ght trap DZUP 381731
Chrysopodes (Chryso podes) sp. Navás, 1913 Serra do Mar BR 277 km 5 4 (São José dos Pinha is/PR) 03 xi 1986 F 1 light t rap DZUP 381732
Chrysopodes (Chryso podes) sp. Navás, 1913 Reserva Es td. de Vila Rica (ITCF ) (Fênix/PR) 02 xi 1986 M 1 light trap DZU P 381733
Chrysopodes (Chryso podes) sp. Navás, 1913 Reserva Es td. de Vila Rica (ITCF ) (Fênix/PR) 02 xi 1986 M 1 light trap DZUP 381734
Nacarina sagitta de Freitas & Penn y, 2001 Reser va Biologica Klabin (Telemaco Borba/PR) 29 iii 1987 M 1 light trap DZUP 381738
Nacarina sagitta de Freitas & Penn y, 2001 Re serva Est d. de Vila Rica (ITCF) (F ênix/PR) 0 4 x 1986 F 1 lig ht trap DZUP 381739
Nacarina sagitta de Freitas & Penn y, 2001 Re serva Est d. de Vila Rica (ITCF) (F ênix/PR) 29 xi 1986 M 1 l ight trap D ZUP 3 81740
Nacarina sagitta de Freitas & Penn y, 2001 Re serva Est d. de Vila Rica (ITCF) (F ênix/PR) ? xi 1986 F 1 light tr ap DZ UP 38 1741
Nacarina sagitta de Freitas & Penn y, 2001 Re serva Est d. de Vila Rica (ITCF) (F ênix/PR) 02 xi 1986 M 2 l ight trap DZUP 381742
Nacarina sagitta de Freitas & Penn y, 2001 Re serva Est d. de Vila Rica (ITCF) (F ênix/PR) 02 xi 1986 F 1 ligh t trap DZUP 381742
Plesiochrysa brasiliensis (Schneider, 1851) Reser va Estd. de Vi la Rica (ITCF) (Fênix /PR) 02 xi 1986 M 1 light trap DZUP 381737
Plesiochrysa brasiliensis (Schneider, 1851) Vila Velha r es. IAPAR BR 376 (Ponta Grossa /PR) 01 i 1987 M 1 light t rap DZUP 381735
Plesiochrysa sp. Adam s, 1982 Serra do Ma r BR 277 km 54 (São José do s Pinhais/PR) 04 x i 1986 M 1 l ight trap DZUP 381743
Plesiochrysa sp. Adam s, 1982 Reser va Estd. de Vila Ri ca (ITCF) (Fênix/ PR) 02 xi 1986 F 1 li ght trap D ZUP 3 81744
Schuster and Machado | Neuroptera (Insecta) of the PROFAUPAR project 1005
Taxo n Locality Date Sex nMethod Voucher n o.
Plesiochrysa sp. Adam s, 1982 Fazenda Monte Ver de (Jundiaí do Sul /PR) 27 iii 1987 F 1 ligh t trap D ZUP 3 81745
Plesiochrysa sp. Adam s, 1982 Serra do Ma r BR 277 km 54 (São José do s Pinhais/PR) 30 i 1987 F 3 light trap DZU P 38174 6
Plesiochrysa sp. Adam s, 1982 Reser va Estd. de Vila Ri ca (ITCF) (Fênix/ PR) 02 xi 1986 M 2 light trap DZUP 381747
Plesiochrysa sp. Adam s, 1982 Estan. Agua de Santa Clara (Guarapuava/PR) 31 iii 1987 F 1 light tr ap DZU P 38174 8
Plesiochrysa sp. Adam s, 1982 Serra do Ma r BR 277 km 54 (São José do s Pinhais/PR) 02 xii 1986 F 1 lig ht trap D ZUP 3 81749
... This is the second long-term study in Brazil that investigates the fauna of Osmylidae in Atlantic rainforest areas. Schuster and Machado (2021), in their study on Neuroptera fauna in Atlantic rainforest areas in the state of Paraná, found only four specimens of I. pulverulentus. The use of different capture methods, such as Malaise traps in this study and light traps in Schuster and Machado (2021), was one of the factors that certainly contributed to the large difference in the amount of Osmylidae captured in the two studies. ...
... Schuster and Machado (2021), in their study on Neuroptera fauna in Atlantic rainforest areas in the state of Paraná, found only four specimens of I. pulverulentus. The use of different capture methods, such as Malaise traps in this study and light traps in Schuster and Machado (2021), was one of the factors that certainly contributed to the large difference in the amount of Osmylidae captured in the two studies. Different authors (Szentkirályi 1992(Szentkirályi , 1997Ábrahám et al. 2003;Lara et al. 2008;Oliveira et al. 2013;Martins et al. 2019;Sarmiento-Cordero et al. 2021) studied Neuroptera sampling and concluded that, for certain groups, it is necessary to combine greater and longer sampling efforts with the use of different types of traps. ...
... Despite the difficulty in quantifying its importance, the climate of the studied locations should also be taken into account when dealing with the difference in the amount of osmylids captured in these two studies. In the localities studied by Schuster and Machado (2021) in the state of Paraná predominate the climatic types Cfa (temperate climate, no dry season and hot summer) and Cfb (temperate climate, no dry season and cold summer) while in the localities sampled in the present study predominate the types Af (tropical equatorial), Am (tropical Monsoon) and Cfa, especially in the São Paulo state (Climate-Data.Org. 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
Between October 2009 and December 2011, five Malaise traps/area were used to survey of the lance lacewings (Neuroptera: Osmylidae) in five areas of the Atlantic rainforest in São Paulo state, Brazil. Were obtained 73 specimens of Isostenosmylus pulverulentus (Gerstaecker, 1894) (96.1% of the total collected), two of Gumilla adspersus Navás, 1912 (2.6%), and one of Isostenosmylus sp. (1.3%). The osmylids were more frequently observed in the Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar / Núcleo Santa Virgínia (59.2% of the total collected), Parque Estadual Intervales (30.3%) and Parque Estadual Morro do Diabo (7.9%), inland collection sites in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. The geographic range of G. adspersus is expanded to include the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, based on two studied specimens and one record in the citizen science website iNaturalist.
... This is the second long-term study in Brazil that investigates the fauna of Osmylidae in Atlantic rainforest areas. Schuster and Machado (2021), in their study on Neuroptera fauna in Atlantic rainforest areas in the state of Paraná, found only four specimens of I. pulverulentus. The use of different capture methods, such as Malaise traps in this study and light traps in Schuster and Machado (2021), was one of the factors that certainly contributed to the large difference in the amount of Osmylidae captured in the two studies. ...
... Schuster and Machado (2021), in their study on Neuroptera fauna in Atlantic rainforest areas in the state of Paraná, found only four specimens of I. pulverulentus. The use of different capture methods, such as Malaise traps in this study and light traps in Schuster and Machado (2021), was one of the factors that certainly contributed to the large difference in the amount of Osmylidae captured in the two studies. Different authors (Szentkirályi 1992(Szentkirályi , 1997Ábrahám et al. 2003;Lara et al. 2008;Oliveira et al. 2013;Martins et al. 2019;Sarmiento-Cordero et al. 2021) studied Neuroptera sampling and concluded that, for certain groups, it is necessary to combine greater and longer sampling efforts with the use of different types of traps. ...
... Despite the difficulty in quantifying its importance, the climate of the studied locations should also be taken into account when dealing with the difference in the amount of osmylids captured in these two studies. In the localities studied by Schuster and Machado (2021) in the state of Paraná predominate the climatic types Cfa (temperate climate, no dry season and hot summer) and Cfb (temperate climate, no dry season and cold summer) while in the localities sampled in the present study predominate the types Af (tropical equatorial), Am (tropical Monsoon) and Cfa, especially in the São Paulo state (Climate-Data.Org. 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
Between October 2009 and December 2011, five Malaise traps/area were used to survey of the lance lacewings (Neuroptera: Osmylidae) in five areas of the Atlantic rainforest in São Paulo state, Brazil. Were obtained 73 specimens of Isostenosmylus pulverulentus (Gerstaecker, 1894) (96.1% of the total collected), two of Gumilla adspersus Navás, 1912 (2.6%), and one of Isostenosmylus sp. (1.3%). The osmylids were more frequently observed in the Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar / Núcleo Santa Virgínia (59.2% of the total collected), Parque Estadual Intervales (30.3%) and Parque Estadual Morro do Diabo (7.9%), inland collection sites in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. The geographic range of G. adspersus is expanded to include the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, based on two studied specimens and one record in the citizen science website iNaturalist.
... Underrepresentation of state biodiversity is undoubtedly a major issue for Brazilian Neuroptera. As indicated by a recent survey in Paraná state which registered an increase of 46% in local neuropterofauna, including the first official records for diverse and commonly collected groups like the owlflies (Myrmeleontidae: Ascalaphinae) (Schuster and Machado, 2021). Amazonas and São Paulo are also the states with the highest number of endemic species, 25 and 18 respectively. ...
... The Brazilian species can be identified using the morphological key provided by Machado and Rafael (2010a). All species recorded from Brazil are endemic, except Nallachius reductus Carpenter which was previously known from Paraguay and only recently recorded from Brazil (Schuster and Machado, 2021). ...
... However, Brazilian states and biomes that currently display relatively high diversity and endemicity should not be excluded from research efforts, given local fauna is unlikely to be fully catalogued even in these areas. This principle was recently demonstrated by Schuster and Machado (2021), who presented a 46% increase in the neuropterofauna known from the state of Paraná, which is almost entirely located in the Mata Atlântica biome, the most diverse biome for lacewings in Brazil (Fig. 6). ...
Article
Full-text available
This survey presents an overall view of the order Neuroptera from Brazil. A total of 432 valid extant species of Neuroptera divided into ten families, are recorded from the country. Among the Brazilian fauna, 211 species are endemic (48.8%), with the majority belonging to two families: Chrysopidae with 182 species in 19 genera, and Myrmeleontidae with 88 species in 25 genera. The first species discovered from Brazil was Climaciella semihyalina (Le Peletier & Audinet-Serville), in 1825, by European authors. In fact, European authors entirely dominated the description of Brazilian Neuroptera during the 19th century. Father Longinos Navás from Spain authored the highest number of species described from Brazil, 98, followed by US-American Norman Penny, with 83 species. Sérgio de Freitas, a Brazilian researcher, ranks third, with a total of 50 species described. It was not until the 21st century that the study of neuropterans from Brazil was primarily led by Brazilian-born authors. Primary type specimens of species described from Brazil are predominantly deposited in non-Brazilian institutions (65.7%). The order Neuroptera is distributed across all Brazilian states, except for Alagoas. The two states with the highest neuropteran biodiversity are Amazonas and São Paulo, with 132 and 124 species, respectively. Among the Brazilian biomes, the Mata Atlântica is the most diverse region with 227 known species, followed by the Amazônia with 192 species. Data on immature stages of Neuroptera are scarce and known for only 47 species recorded from Brazil (10.9%). Keywords: Lacewings; Antlions; Catalog; Species list
... In Brazil, Nusalala and Hemerobius were reported in several studies carried out in agricultural Freitas, 2002, 2003;Lara et al., 2008Lara et al., , 2010Lara et al., , 2020Melo et al., 2020) and wild environments (Oliveira et al., 2013;Lara and Perioto, 2021;Schuster and Machado, 2021), and in most of them, Nusalala was the most abundant genus. However, in all these studies, Megalomus, Notiobiella and Sympherobius are genera, so far, poorly represented in population surveys conducted by the authors in agroecosystems and wild environments. ...
... This is the second long-term study on the Hemerobiidae fauna in Atlantic rainforest areas in Brazil. Consequently, the results of this study can only be compared with Schuster and Machado (2021), and by similar studies conducted in other Brazilian biomes, such as the Brazilian savanna and some of its phytophysiognomies. Schuster and Machado (2021) studied the Neuroptera in Atlantic rainforest areas in the state of Paraná, Brazil and found that Hemerobiidae was the third most abundant family, represented by three genera and seven species, with higher frequencies in summer; among them, Hemerobius was the most frequent genus. ...
... Consequently, the results of this study can only be compared with Schuster and Machado (2021), and by similar studies conducted in other Brazilian biomes, such as the Brazilian savanna and some of its phytophysiognomies. Schuster and Machado (2021) studied the Neuroptera in Atlantic rainforest areas in the state of Paraná, Brazil and found that Hemerobiidae was the third most abundant family, represented by three genera and seven species, with higher frequencies in summer; among them, Hemerobius was the most frequent genus. ...
Article
Full-text available
A survey of the brown lacewings (Neuroptera, Hemerobiidae) was carried out with five Malaise traps/area in five areas in Atlantic rainforest of São Paulo State, Brazil, between October 2009 and December 2011. 237 specimens of Hemerobiidae were obtained belonging to 14 species and five genera: Nusalala tessellata (Gerstaecker, 1888) (31.6% of the total collected), Hemerobius hernandezi Monserrat, 1996 (26.0%), Nusalala dispar (Banks, 1910) (17.7%), H. cubanus Banks, 1930, H. edui Monserrat, 1991, H. nigridorsus Monserrat, 1996 and H. withycombei (Kimmins, 1928) (1.7% each), H gaitoi Monserrat, 1996, Megalomus ricoi Monserrat, 1997 and Notiobiella cixiiformis (Gerstaecker, 1888) (1.3% each), Sympherobius ariasi Penny & Monserrat, 1985 (0.9%) and, M. impudicus (Gerstaecker, 1888), M. rafaeli Penny & Monserrat, 1985 and S. mirandus (Navás, 1920) (0.4% each). Eighteen specimens of Hemerobius Linnaeus, 1758 and nine of Megalomus Rambur, 1842, totaling 11.4% of the collected Hemerobiidae, could not be identified at the species level. The hemerobiids were more frequent in the Parque Estadual Intervales (55.3% of the total collected) and in the Parque Estadual Morro do Diabo (23.2%), inland collection sites in the state of São Paulo, with higher abundances recorded in spring (43.9% of the total collected) and in winter (37.1%). This study extends the geographic distribution range of five species of Hemerobiidae to Brazil and three to the state of São Paulo. Keywords: Hemerobius; Megalomus; Notiobiella; Nusalala; Sympherobius
Article
Argentoleon irrigatus (Gerstaecker), is a common antlion species, but with sparse figures and incomplete location records in the literature, whose genitalia and larvae remained undescribed. Herein, the adults are redescribed and immatures (larvae and pupa) are described for the first time, providing images of internal and external characters, including both male and female genitalia. The examination and illustration of these characters allowed us to better understand the position and the limits of the genus Argentoleon Stange, within the tribe Brachynemurini, including the differentiation of the larval stages of the closely related genus Austroleon Banks. Additionally, the distribution of Ar. irrigatus is updated and a map is elaborated, resulting in seven new state records for Brazil and a new country record from Colombia. Some biological aspects are also analyzed, regarding rearing in captivity and natural habitat, providing resources for future ecologic and biogeographical analyses. Furthermore, we analyzed the type specimens of the extensive synonymic list of Ar. irrigatus concluding that Austroleon stictogaster Navás, is in fact a synonym of Austroleon immitis (Walker), and not of Ar. irrigatus as currently accepted. Overall, a full taxonomic actualization of Ar. irrigatus is presented.
Article
Full-text available
Species of the thorny lacewing subfamily Symphrasinae (Neuroptera: Rhachiberothidae) are revised. Prior to this work, 42 species were known in the genera Anchieta Navás, 1909, Plega Navás, 1928, and Trichoscelia Westwood, 1852. Herein, the number of species is increased to 60, 23 of which are newly described. Species previously known are redescribed, and their taxonomic status is revised. Keys, diagnoses, and high-resolution images for all species are presented. The distribution range of Anchieta is now known from Costa Rica to southern Brazil with a total of 11 species, of which three are newly described. The genus Plega is known from southwestern United States to southern Brazil and includes 28 species of which 14 are described as new. Moreover, the genus Trichoscelia occurs from central and southern Mexico to Argentina, with a total of 21 species, of which six are herein newly described. A phylogenetic analysis of Symphrasinae based on morphological characters recovered the three symphrasine genera as monophyletic, with Anchieta sister to Plega + Trichoscelia. The three genera are newly diagnosed based on a cladistic framework. Within the genus Anchieta, bee-mimicking species comprise a monophyletic group, while wasp-mimicking species form a laddered sequence to that lineage. Within Plega, three lineages are recovered, the first mostly composed of South and Mesoamerican species, the second with species predominantly from Central America and central and southern Mexico, and a third clade encompassing species mostly from central and northern Mexico and southwestern United States. By contrast, relationships between species of Trichoscelia were poorly resolved because of a simplified and conserved morphology of this group.
Article
Full-text available
The tribe Ululodini is one of the most remarkable taxa of Neotropical Neuroptera, mainly due to its great flight ability, eyes divided into two lobes, and production of abortive eggs that act as a chemical barrier against predators. Nonetheless, Ululodini remains little studied. One genus of this tribe, Ascalorphne Banks 1915, currently comprises four valid species: A. macrocerca (Burmeister, 1839), A. impavida (Walker, 1853), A. umbrina (Gerstaecker, 1884), and A. leisewitzi (Navás, 1911). This study reviews the taxonomy of Ascalorphne, redescribing the external morphology and, for the first time, the male and female genitalia. Furthermore, A. leisewitzi is proposed as a new synonym of A. umbrina, an identification key is presented, and the geographic distribution of the genus is updated based on collected specimens and data available in the citizen science project iNaturalist. Also, the body and genital morphology of Ululodini were comparatively studied and analyzed in a phylogenetic context with all other Ascalaphinae tribes that occur in the Neotropics, allowing a better understanding of the evolution and biology of these insects. As a result, new synapomorphies for Ululodini are presented, Albardia furcata Oswald, 1903 is recovered as the sister taxon to the rest of the tribe, Ameropterus Esben-Petersen, 1922 was recovered as paraphyletic, and Ascalorphne was recovered as monophyletic in all analyses. Keywords: Genitalia; Lacewings; Owlfly; Phylogeny; Taxonomy
Article
Climacia McLachlan is a New World genus, and with 21 valid species is currently the second richest genus of Sisyridae. The taxonomic knowledge of this freshwater insect is controversial, with non-standardized terminologies of genitalia and wings venation, additionally, nothing was known about the phylogenetic relationships of its species. Thus, Climacia was reviewed in a phylogenetic context. Description and illustrations are provided to previously described species, and two new species are herein described, C. flinti sp. nov. and C. payaya sp. nov. Moreover, C. desordenata Monserrat, 2005 is re-validated and a neotype for C. californica Chandler, 1953 is designated. We provide standardized terminologies of genitalia and wings venation. The parsimony analysis using morphological characters recovered Climacia as a monophyletic group, and sister group to all the other genera of Sisyridae. A relationship hypothesis is proposed, suggesting a tendency of reduction in RP branches number in the forewing. Identification keys for Sisyridae genera and for all known species of Climacia are also presented.
Article
Full-text available
Haploglenius decorus sp. n. is described from French Guiana and Ecuador and compared to other Haploglenius species known from South America. Haploglenius latoreticulatus van der Weele, 1909 (stat. n.) is moved to new status, the species is compared to Haploglenius luteus (Walker, 1853) and Haploglenius handlirschi van der Weele, 1909. Haploglenius neoguineensis Navás, 1914 (syn. n.) is a new junior synonym of Haploglenius latoreticulatus van der Weele, 1909. Type specimen of Haploglenius neoguineensis Navás, 1914 from New Guinea is mislabeled since all Haploglenius species live in South America. Neohaploglenius rondonianus Penny, 1982 (syn. n.) is a new junior synonym of Verticillecerus gerstaeckeri van der Weele, 1909. With 15 figures.
Article
Full-text available
The species of Berothidae (Insecta: Neuroptera) collected in an area of Brazilian savannah at the Parque Nacional Chapada dos Veadeiros, Alto Paraíso de Goiás municipality, Goiás state, Brazil were documented based in a survey using Malaise traps between February 2018 and May 2019. Were captured four specimens of Spiroberotha tocantinensis Machado & Krolow, 2016 and one specimen of Lomamyia trombetensis Penny, 1983. Both species have their extension of the geographical range expanded to Goiás state.
Article
Full-text available
The genera Ameropterus Esben-Petersen, 1922 and Fillus Navás, 1919 are recorded from Colombia for the first time. New distributional records for two Cordulecerus Rambur, 1842 species are also presented. Ameropterus dissimilis (McLachlan, 1871) and Ameropterus scutellaris (Gerstaecker, 1894) are redescribed and illustrated, and Ameropterus mexicanus (Van der Weele, 1909) is here proposed as a junior synonym of the latter. The taxonomic status of Nephelasca crocea Navás, 1914 is discussed. Keys to the Colombian species of Ameropterus and Cordulecerus and a list of the split-eyed Ascalaphinae species of the New World are also given.
Article
Full-text available
The first large‐scale, total‐evidence phylogeny of the owlflies (Neuroptera, Ascalaphidae) is presented. A combined morphological and molecular dataset was analysed under several analytical regimes for 76 exemplars of Myrmeleontiformia (Psychopsidae, Nymphidae, Nemopteridae, Myrmeleontidae, Ascalaphidae), including 57 of Ascalaphidae. At the subordinal level, the families were recovered in all analyses in the form Psychopsidae + (Nymphidae + (Nemopteridae + (Myrmeleontidae + Ascalaphidae). In the DNA‐only maximum‐likelihood analysis, Ascalaphidae were recovered as paraphyletic with respect to the Myrmeleontidae and the tribe Ululodini. In both the parsimony and Bayesian total‐evidence analyses, however, the latter with strong support, traditional Ascalaphidae were recovered as monophyletic, and in the latter, Stilbopteryginae were placed as the immediate sister group. The long‐standing subfamilies Haplogleniinae and Ascalaphinae were not recovered as monophyletic in any analysis, nor were several of the included tribes of non‐ululodine Ascalaphinae. The Ululodini were monophyletic and well supported in all analyses, as were the New World Haplogleniinae and, separately, the African/Malagasy Haplogleniinae. The remaining Ascalaphidae, collectively, were also consistently cohesive, but included a genus that until now has been placed in the Haplogleniinae, Protidricerus. Protidricerus was discovered to express a well‐developed pleurostoma, a feature previously only encountered in divided‐eye owlflies. The feature traditionally used to differentiate the Haplogleniinae and Ascalaphinae, the entire or divided eye, can no longer be regarded as a spot‐diagnostic synapomorphy to separate these groups within the family. A new subfamilial classification based on these results is proposed and includes the following five subfamilies: Albardiinae, Ululodinae, Haplogleniinae, Melambrotinae and Ascalaphinae. In addition, the monophyletic containing group (Myrmeleontidae + (Palparidae + (Stilbopterygidae + Ascalaphidae))) is elevated to the rank of superfamily, as Myrmeleontoidea, in order to accommodate much‐needed taxonomic and nomenclatural restructuring anticipated to occur within the Ascalaphidae in the future. A list of genera included in each subfamily of Ascalaphidae is provided.
Article
Full-text available
A new species, Nothochrysa ehrenbergisp. nov., is described from Chile; it is the first species of Nothochrysa to be reported from the Southern Hemisphere and only the second from the New World. The genus now contains six extant species as well as two species known from late Oligocene and Miocene fossils. An updated catalog of the valid Nothochrysa species is presented, and three nomina dubia are discussed. The inclusion of the new species in Nothochrysa is well supported by morphological features. However, it and other species currently in the genus also share significant features with Archaeochrysa, an older genus of Nothochrysinae which is known only from the Eocene (Ypresian) to the late Oligocene. It therefore appears that N. ehrenbergi is among the least derived Nothochrysa species, and that the separation of Archaeochrysa from Nothochrysa is open to question and further examination.
Article
Full-text available
This study focused on Mantispidae species (Neuroptera) from Tocantins state in Brazil. Herein we provide nine new records to this state, increasing the total number of mantidflies from Tocantins to 12. New records are as following: Anchieta fumosella (Westwood, 1867); Dicromantispa moulti (Navás, 1909); Entanoneura batesella (Westwood, 1867); Haematomantispa sp.; Leptomantispa chaos Hoffman, 2002; Plega hagenella (Westwood, 1867); Trichoscelia varia (Walker, 1853); Zeugomantispa compellens (Walker, 1860); Z. virescens (Rambur, 1842). We also provide the first list of Mantispidae species from Tocantins, including general notes for each one, and identification key for these species.
Article
Full-text available
The first phylogenomic analysis of the antlions is presented, based on 325 genes captured using anchored hybrid enrichment. A concatenated matrix including 207 species of Myrmeleontoidea (170 Myrmeleontidae) was analysed under maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. Both Myrmeleontidae (antlions) and Ascalaphidae (owlflies) were recovered as paraphyletic with respect to each other. The majority of the subfamilies traditionally assigned to both Myrmeleontidae and Ascalaphidae were also recovered as paraphyletic. By contrast, all traditional antlion tribes were recovered as monophyletic (except Brachynemurini), but most subtribes were found to be paraphyletic. When compared with the traditional classification of Myrmeleontidae, our results do not support the current taxonomy. Therefore, based on our phylogenomic results, we propose a new classification for the antlions, which synonymizes Ascalaphidae with Myrmeleontidae and divides the family into four subfamilies (Ascalaphinae, Myrmeleontinae, Dendroleontinae and Nemoleontinae) and 17 tribes. We also highlight the most pressing issues in antlion systematics and indicate taxa that need further taxonomic and phylogenetic attention. Finally, we present a comprehensive table placing all extant genera of antlions and owlflies in our new proposed classification, including details on the number of species, distribution and notes on the likely monophyly of each genus.
Article
The antlion species, Glenurus incalis Banks is the most enigmatic species of this New World genus. It was described almost 100 years ago based on a single female collected in the Peruvian Amazon, which until today remained as the only known specimen. Herein I report four new specimens of Glenurus incalis, which were used to thoroughly redescribe the species and to expand its distribution to Brazil. Notes on the other Brazilian species of Glenurus is also presented, including the first record of G. heteropteryx Gerstaecker to the country.
Article
Herein we describe two new species of lacewing in the family Dilaridae from northeastern Brazil: Nallachius furcatus, n. sp. and N. potiguar, n. sp. We also describe range expansions for three species: N. adamsi Penny, 1982 from Manaus to the border of the states of Amazonas and Pará; N. dicolor Adams, 1970 from the state of Santa Catarina to the states of Goiás and Minas Gerais; N. limai Adams, 1970 from Santa Catarina to Paraná. An identification key to adults and a checklist of Brazilian species are presented.
Chapter
The Neuropterida are a multiordinal clade of holometabolous insects that encompasses the extant orders Megaloptera, Neuroptera, and Raphidioptera. Recent phylogenetic work based on genome‐scale molecular data provides additional evidence for the monophyly of the Neuropterida, and supports its placement in the Holometabola as the sister group to the Coleoptera + Strepsiptera, where it has traditionally been placed on the basis of morphology alone. Two additional useful works that broadly review the biodiversity of the Neuropterida, and that contain useful compendia of representative color illustrations of numerous species, are those of U. Aspock and H. Aspock. The study of Michel and his team is a major step forward in the understanding of antlion phylogeny, and represents a new starting point for reconsideration of the currently confused and conflicting suprageneric classifications in use by different authors for the most diverse family in the order Neuroptera.