BookPDF Available

Transitioning to Decent Work and Economic Growth

Authors:

Abstract

According to the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), the private sector plays a key role in achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). After all, sustainable and inclusive economic growth is essential to enable more people to participate in global prosperity. Encouraging entrepreneurship and job creation are key to SDG 8, as are effective measures to eradicate forced labor, slavery, and human trafficking. Since more than 90 percent of jobs are created by the private sector, more attention must be paid to entrepreneurs that help create dynamic and responsible enterprises that often generate positive externalities for society and the environment through investments in scalable innovations and a commitment to local embeddedness. As such, they help lift people out of poverty through new and relatively well-paid jobs and enable local economies to become more sustainable through global value chain integration.
Preface to Transitioning to Decent Work and
Economic Growth
Isabelle Schluep, Philipp Aerni and Marianthe Stavridou
1. Introduction
We live in unprecedented times. Five years after the launch of the United
Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) in 2015, and one year after the
first lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the global eort to build a
more equal, inclusive and sustainable society will likely experience a serious setback.
The desire to create a more inclusive and sustainable global economy proved
to be one of the few common denominators in the design and launch of the
SDGs. The emphasis on the creation of economic opportunities to address global
sustainability challenges also implied that business should play a prominent role
in the implementation of the SDGs. This view amounted to a major paradigm
shift in the way we think about sustainability. The Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs), which were launched by the UN in 2000 to reduce poverty by half in 2015
(UN 2000)
, did not regard private sector involvement as highly relevant. Regarding
environmental sustainability, the aim of the SDGs to create a green economy also
implies that regulation alone will not be able to save the planet; instead, it requires
the courage to invest in innovative solutions that eectively address environmental
challenges, while creating new jobs for the next generation. This progressive
understanding of sustainability is clearly articulated in the Agenda for Sustainable
Development (2030 Agenda), designed to implement the 17 SDGs with its 169 targets.
The 2030 Agenda calls on governments, civil society, and, most importantly, the
private sector to join forces in realizing this plan of action for the people, planet
and prosperity (UN 2015). It is based on the basic insight that business is a part of
society—not apart from society.
SDG 8 very much embodies this paradigm shift. It aims to “promote sustained,
inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and
decent work for all”. Its emphasis is on the creation of business opportunities
that especially benefit the local people and the environment. It is also linked to
the importance of institutional and technological innovations designed to enable
this transition. As such, SDG 8 is connected with many other goals, such as the
elimination of poverty (SDG 1) and hunger (SDG 2), the promotion of access to quality
1
education (SDG 4) and improved infrastructure (SDG 9), the reduction in global
inequality (SDG 10), the promotion of responsible consumption and production (SDG
12), and capacity development and access to markets (SDG 17). Its emphasis on
economic empowerment has also an important link to gender equality (SDG 5).
Finally, SDG 8 is key to every person’s life. “Decent work is at the heart of
the search for dignity for the individual, stability for the family and peace in the
community” as put by Juan Somav
í
a, former Director-General of the International
Labor Organization (ILO). In addition, SDG 8 stands for the catalytic linkages and
spillovers between employment and development. After all, labor income contributes
considerably to the reduction of poverty (Azevedo et al. 2013); and more and better
quality jobs are the surest pathway to achieve social inclusion, to end poverty and
boost prosperity (IFC 2013).
Even before the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the world economy, the jobs
challenge has been enormous; it was calculated that, between 2016 and 2030, 30 million
jobs would be required per year just to keep pace with the increasing global working
age population (UN 2018). COVID-19 caused the worst global recession since the
Great Depression in the 1930s (Gopinath 2021), and resulted in the loss of 255 million
full-time jobs, which is about four times more than over the course of the global
financial crisis in 2009 (ILO 2021). The International Monetary Fund (IMF) expects
that, in 2021, more than 150 economies will have per-capita incomes below 2019
levels, and that workers with little education, youth, women and persons employed
in the informal sector will be disproportionately aected by the expected losses of
income (IMF 2021; Gopinath 2021). As a consequence, the IMF projects that close to
90 million persons could fall into extreme poverty over the course of 2020–2021, which
could reverse many of the social achievements of the past 20 years
(Gopinath 2021;
IMF 2021
). In reaction to this crisis, the United Nations have released a socio-economic
response framework (UN 2020).
UN Secretary General Ant
ó
nio Guterres rightly argued that “Everything we do
during and after the COVID-19 crisis must be with a strong focus on building more
equal, inclusive and sustainable economies and societies that are more resilient in the
face of pandemics, climate change and the many other global challenges we face”
(The Lancet 2020). This quote represents the core of SDG 8 on the creation of inclusive
growth and decent work, it very much addresses the concerns of the majority world,
the people who live in low-income countries. Since more than 90 percent of jobs in
developing countries are created by the private sector (IFC 2013), more attention
must be paid to entrepreneurs that help create dynamic, growth-oriented, innovative
and responsible enterprises. To succeed in the long-run, entrepreneurs need to gain
2
trust as responsible business partners and create value for society. As such, they not
only propel their own business, but also enable other people to get out of poverty
through the enhancement of local economic opportunities.
In high-income countries, the fear that the fourth industrial revolution could
render many jobs obsolete is real. In response to this concern, the policy focus in
many of these countries has shifted from a defensive attitude toward sustainable
development, which is mainly concerned with preserving economic structures and
preventing unsustainable change through regulation, toward a more forward-looking
attitude, which is more focused on creating new sustainable markets through
innovative entrepreneurship. In this context, the volume “Transitioning to Decent
Work and Economic Growth” may be a valuable guide for policy makers aiming to
move towards a more progressive understanding of sustainable development.
2. Chapters in the Volume
The contributions in this volume may only cover a fraction of the breadth of
SDG 8, but they outline the major opportunities and challenges of the eorts to
implement SDG 8 from dierent perspectives. Generally, there is a consensus among
the authors that SDG 8 is also highly relevant in the eective implementation of many
other SDGs, and that institutional framework conditions are of crucial importance to
enable inclusive and sustainable change by making “business part of the solution”.
This volume aims to approach decent work and economic growth under dierent
perspectives. Each chapter highlights a diverse set of issues.
From a business and economic history perspective, Alex Gertschen discusses
multinational enterprises’ (MNEs) local embeddedness in Mexico during the period
from the early 1970s to the 2000s. Analysing the interplay of economic cooperation
and cultural change, he reconstructs MNEs’ transformation from sceptically viewed
outsiders to engines of economic development and normative role models. Together
with local business, they promoted the idea that competitiveness in global value
chains allowed for or even required social responsibility. The author concludes
that MNEs’ embeddedness in Mexico indeed serves as an example that economic
performance and social standards can be reached simultaneously, as postulated by
SDG 8. However, this “virtuous cycle” may work only under certain circumstances
and not for all. This qualification is suggested by the fact that it is largely confined to
the globalized part of Mexico’s economy.
For Maria Elo and Arla Juntunen, preventive governance and targeted
collaboration with diaspora organisations and the civil society are needed to
reduce the phenomena of exploitation, slavery, human tracking and abuse in
3
a developed country like Finland and help the country safeguard decent work
principles. The case study on Finland presents illicit and abusive practices related
to migration, which develop partly due to an institutional lack of attention and
experience. Human tracking, slavery and abuse may start in the migrant’s home
countries during the recruitment of the workforce by transnational criminal networks;
however, they represent a recent and unperceived phenomenon in the host country
with fundamental socioeconomic implications. The actors of such networks are mostly
people of foreign-origin or people within ethnic enclaves in Finland. This indicates
the existence of cultural- and language-related institutional divides. The authors
suggest investing in targeted collaboration among the main stakeholders to increase
awareness about decent work, close loopholes, and prevent illicit practices early on,
before they start mushrooming.
Philipp Aerni challenges mainstream economic thinking on sustainable
development in high-income countries, which tends to ignore the potential positive
externalities created through scalable innovation for society and the environment.
It fails to understand that poverty is still the main enemy of sustainability in many
low-income countries. He argues that tackling the unmet material needs of the
poor, promoting inclusive economic change and enabling innovation that helps to
decouple economic growth from natural resource use would require action-oriented
public–private partnerships and institutional framework conditions that better award
innovative entrepreneurship for sustainable and inclusive change. He also proposes
an understanding of businesses as an integral part of society and not just an external
black box. In this context, he presented concrete international and national initiatives
that were proven to contribute to sustainable and inclusive change. Finally, Aerni is
concerned that most of the teaching material used in “Education for Sustainable
development” (ESD) tends to ignore examples, which prove that businesses can be
part of the solution.
Dino Sozzi was a practitioner at Ciba–Geigy company in the 1980s in Indonesia,
when the indebted Indonesian government was forced to stop buying agrochemicals
in bulk from the company in order to subsequently resell it at a subsidized price to
farmers. He describes how this agricultural reform forced the company to focus its
attention directly on the farmers, and how they apply their products. The company
realized that it is in its very long-term self-interest to encourage their farming clients
to apply their input in a more sustainable, safe and eective way. It did so by
creating local capacity-building programs that helped farmers to better manage
their resources. Thus, the commercial activities of Ciba-Geigy crop protection,
and eventually its legacy company Syngenta, became more embedded in the local
4
economy, which also increased the appreciation of the local farming communities.
The new corporate commitment to supporting local farmers in improving their
agricultural practices changed the landscape of income, education and employment
for the local communities as a whole. This is the turning point at which Sozzi
believes that his company started to make a genuine contribution to a more inclusive
local economy.
Lia Ferrini discusses the literature gap in corporate social responsibility (CSR)
research regarding the ethical tensions faced by subsidiaries of MNEs operating in
developing countries when they have to navigate between global ethical standards,
local contexts and CSR guidelines. Her review brings together two distinguished
debates on “business ethics and culture” and “trade-os in CSR”, and highlights
research gaps proposing new advances in research.
Romano De Vivo, Ettore Capri, Henri Rue, Antonio Gaudioso, Alexandru
Marchis and Gianpiero Menza explore climate change mitigation and adaptation
options for agriculture, the world’s largest employer and provider of livelihoods for
40 percent of the global population. They present Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA)
as a model that can best help to guide transformative actions in the agri-food sector
to increase productivity and resilience and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions
in a sustainable way. The CSA’s “action path” for sustainable and inclusive
economic growth includes policies that enable multi-stakeholder collaboration,
and are implemented by organizations that have integrated sustainability into their
business models.
Sumon Vangchuay and Amanda Niklaus examine the gender gap in the
workforce of the renewable energy sector, a young and fast-growing sector often
perceived as progressive by the public at large. The authors discuss this issue at two
levels: framework and practice, and argue that the socio-economic progress to be
made in the renewable energy sector under the SDGs does not necessarily extend
to gender diversity in the workforce. They conclude, that a widespread gender
gap in the renewable energy workforce casts serious doubts about the inclusive
growth and progress made in the energy transition under the SDGs. Vangchuay and
Niklaus highlight the need to align economic growth with inclusion, and recommend
that significant, targeted eorts be put in place to challenge the traditional gender
perspectives and guarantee a sustainable change within this sector.
The last chapter by Marianthe Stavridou focuses on the contribution of a high-end
technology Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) in Switzerland to inclusive and
sustainable change. She shows how innovative entrepreneurship is guided by a
vision to create long-term prosperity among the workforce by taking a human-centred
5
approach to business. The author challenges the existing concept of decent work, in
which economic growth is still understood in its crude measurement as the growth
in gross domestic product (GDP). Instead, she proposes a 21st century narrative of
decent work that is based on a more holistic understanding of economic development.
3. Conclusions
This Volume pulls together analyses and experiences from the past and present,
from large and small companies, from the Global South and North, and from dierent
sectors. Many contributions point out that entrepreneurship and innovation are
important drivers of inclusive and sustainable change. In this context, there is a
general agreement that business can be part of the solution in eorts to realize the
2030 Agenda in general, and SDG 8 in particular.
References
Azevedo, Joao Pedro, Gabriela Inchauste, Sergio Olivieri, Jaime Saavedra, and Hernan Winkler.
2013. Is Labor Income Responsible for Poverty Reduction? A Decomposition Approach. World
Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6414. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Gopinath, Gita. 2021. A Race Between Vaccines and the Virus as Recoveries Diverge. IMF Blog
from 26 January 2021. Available online: https://blogs.imf.org/2021/01/26/a-race-between-
vaccines-and-the-virus-as-recoveries-diverge/(accessed on 8 March 2021).
International Finance Corporation. 2013. IFC Jobs Study: Assessing Private Sector Contributions
to Job Creation and Poverty Reduction. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation,
Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/16979 (accessed
on 24 February 2021).
International Labour Organization. 2021. ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the World
of Work. Seventh Edition. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/
public/---dgreports/-- -dcomm/documents/briefingnote/wcms_767028.pdf (accessed on
22 February 2021).
International Monetary Fund. 2021. World Economic Outlook Update. January 2021.
Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2021/01/26/2021-
world-economic-outlook-update (accessed on 8 March 2021).
The Lancet Public Health. 2020. Will the COVID-19 Pandemic threaten the SDGs? The Lancet
Public Health 5: e460. [CrossRef]
United Nations. 2020. COVID-19 response. Sustainable Development Goals. Available
online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/economic-growth/(accessed on 8
March 2021).
6
United Nations. 2018. Decent Work and Economic Growth: Why It Matters. Available
online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/8_
Why-It-Matters-2020.pdf (accessed on 25 March 2021).
United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
General Assembly Resolution 70/1 adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September
2015. Available online: https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/
1&Lang=E (accessed on 8 March 2021).
United Nations. 2000. United Nations Millennium Declaration. General Assembly Resolution
55/2. Available online: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f4ea3.html (accessed on 6
March 2021).
©2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open
access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
7
... In a report published in 1987 entitled 'Our Common Future' [58], the World Commission on Environment and Development provided a well-established general definition of sustainable development related to intergenerational equity, which was approved by the UN General Assembly. The 17 UN SDGs build on this concept, but also include the need for 'inclusive growth', emphasizing the importance of sustainable technological and economic change through institutional framework conditions that enable 'business to become part of the solution' [59]. The need for inclusive and sustainable economic change represents the relevant link to corporate sustainability. ...
... Recent empirical studies have revealed several rating biases [34][35][36][39][40][41] and a great variation in rating outcomes depending on the choice of rating and its underlying definition of corporate sustainability [18,19,21,[23][24][25]. Other studies point out that a risk-based approach used in ESG rating and carbon footprint measurement may lead to a withdrawal of foreign direct investment from high-risk low-income countries and thus lead to exclusive growth rather than the inclusive growth that the UN Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) envision [29,59]. Finally, several studies have revealed that current ESG rating and reporting systems are time-consuming and costly, and therefore not suitable for SMEs [7, 53,65]. ...
... In a report published in 1987 entitled 'Our Common Future' [58], the World Commission on Environment and Development provided a well-established general definition of sustainable development related to intergenerational equity, which was approved by the UN General Assembly. The 17 UN SDGs build on this concept, but also include the need for 'inclusive growth', emphasizing the importance of sustainable technological and economic change through institutional framework conditions that enable 'business to become part of the solution' [59]. The need for inclusive and sustainable economic change represents the relevant link to corporate sustainability. ...
... Recent empirical studies have revealed several rating biases [34][35][36][39][40][41] and a great variation in rating outcomes depending on the choice of rating and its underlying definition of corporate sustainability [18,19,21,[23][24][25]. Other studies point out that a risk-based approach used in ESG rating and carbon footprint measurement may lead to a withdrawal of foreign direct investment from high-risk low-income countries and thus lead to exclusive growth rather than the inclusive growth that the UN Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) envision [29,59]. Finally, several studies have revealed that current ESG rating and reporting systems are time-consuming and costly, and therefore not suitable for SMEs [7, 53,65]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Rating agencies that assess a company’s environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) impact have been subject to public and academic scrutiny due to divergent and often biased rating outcomes. Concurrently, an evolving regulatory environment mandates publicly listed companies to report on ESG and climate emissions, taking into account supply chain risks as well. As a result, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are increasingly asked as suppliers to present a credible sustainability certificate. The esg2go rating and reporting system aims at improving the credibility and practicality of corporate sustainability assessment. It was jointly developed with its users and relevant stakeholders and is based on a calibrated benchmarking system from verifiable data. The rating method enables the measurement and comparison of sector- and firm size-specific sustainability performance. Its underlying adaptive parametrization is derived from a coherent and pragmatic definition of SME sustainability as the ‘ability to co-exist’. Our data analyses indicate that our scoring function is able to minimize bias and deliver a fair comparability between SMEs. We conclude that esg2go represents a pragmatic and innovative approach to enhance the fairness and accuracy of corporate sustainability assessment.
... Its authors represent some of the leading scholars in Sustainability Science who are largely concerned with the science-policy interface that is meant to drive the transformative pathways toward sustainability. Yet, it tends to ignore that, ultimately, it is business, not science, that transforms the economy and society through scalable innovations (Hidalgo, 2015;Aerni et al., 2021). Consequently, GSDR reports never refer to the numerous UN reports or academic papers concerned with the role of entrepreneurship and innovation for sustainable development (Aerni, 2021b). ...
Article
Full-text available
The term “polycrisis” has become a buzzword to describe the entanglement and reinforcement of multiple global crises that may put the survival of humankind at risk. It builds upon Sustainability Science and its research on the complex interactions of systemic risks. The research approach has its roots in the “Limits to Growth” report published by the Club of Rome in 1972. The publication predicted a global sustainability crisis in response to growing human resource consumption. The threat is real, but there are lessons to be learned from coping with past global crises and how they were addressed by far-sighted government initiatives that incentivized decentralized innovation systems to achieve well-defined objectives. These initiatives proved to be effective because they were based on an adequate understanding of the endogenous nature of economic development and how biocapacity and societal resilience can be enhanced through higher levels of economic complexity. Contemporary European mission-oriented innovation policies (MOIPs) with their strong faith in the state as pacesetter of the economy lack this understanding. In this paper, a more pragmatic innovation policy approach is proposed to accelerate progress on the UN Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) in general, and food security in particular. It combines the target orientation of past US innovation policy missions with the commitment of international crop research networks to mobilize innovation and entrepreneurship for inclusive development. Throughout history, such opportunity-driven approaches proved to be more effective public policy responses to crisis than attempts to minimize systemic risks by limiting growth.
... Starting from the extant literature on economic growth [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63], we have conducted an investigation on this phenomenon and its evolution using relevant macroeconomic indicators for 36 European countries from the third quarter of 2018 until the third quarter of 2021. ...
Article
Full-text available
This research study examines the factors that determined economic growth measured by gross domestic product, gross value added, final consumption expenditure of households, and gross fixed capital formation across a sample of 36 European countries during the time frame Q3 2018−Q3 2021. We conducted a panel data analysis with the first-difference generalized method of moments (GMM) approach and cross-section fixed effects. Empirical results estimated with four econometric models indicated a significant robust impact of the independent variables exports, imports, foreign direct investment inflow, foreign direct investment outflow, social contributions, and wages on economic growth proxies. In addition, multiplex network analysis was used to investigate the connection architectures of the 36 countries, and it yielded statistical measurements for all layers in the multi-layered structure. Relevant policy implications of reported empirical results are also addressed.
Article
Full-text available
Demographics, labor income, public transfers, or remittances: Which factor contributes the most to observed reductions in poverty? Using counterfactual simulations, this paper accounts for the contribution labor income has made to the observed changes in poverty over the past decade for a set of 16 countries that have experienced substantial declines in poverty. In contrast to methods that focus on aggregate summary statistics, the analysis generates entire counterfactual distributions that allow assessing the contributions of different factors to observed distributional changes. Decompositions across all possible paths are calculated so the estimates are not subject to path-dependence. The analysis shows that for most countries in the sample, labor income is the most important contributor to changes in poverty. In ten of the countries, labor income explains more than half of the change in moderate poverty; in another four, it accounts for more than 40 percent of the reduction in poverty. Although public and private transfers were relatively more important in explaining the reduction in extreme poverty, more and better-paying jobs were the key factors behind poverty reduction over the past decade.
A Race Between Vaccines and the Virus as Recoveries Diverge. IMF Blog from 26
  • Gita Gopinath
Gopinath, Gita. 2021. A Race Between Vaccines and the Virus as Recoveries Diverge. IMF Blog from 26 January 2021. Available online: https://blogs.imf.org/2021/01/26/a-race-betweenvaccines-and-the-virus-as-recoveries-diverge/ (accessed on 8 March 2021).
The Lancet Public Health. 2020. Will the COVID-19 Pandemic threaten the SDGs? The Lancet Public Health 5: e460
The Lancet Public Health. 2020. Will the COVID-19 Pandemic threaten the SDGs? The Lancet Public Health 5: e460. [CrossRef]