ArticlePDF Available

The art of craft in the interior

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

In relation to the most characteristic architectural styles and movements, this paper discusses the issues of creation and development of artistic crafts that influence the formation and decoration of interior space. The evolution of crafts from a purely utilitarian activity to a form of decorative and applied art used to transform the interior environment by holistic and functional means is being considered through the lens of subjectspatial and functional-artistic organization.
Content may be subject to copyright.
The art of craft in the interior
Lyailya Kuleeva1[0000-0003-3107-7767], Tatyana Burova1[0000-0001-8965-7225], Ludmila Listovskaya1[0000-0002-5978-1599],
IlseyarSaifullina1[0000-0001-8590-2512], and Ainaz Ibragimova1[0000-0002-2786-5309]
1Kazan State University of Architecture and Engineering, 420043 Kazan, Russia
Abstract. In relation to the most characteristic architectural styles and
movements, this paper discusses the issues of creation and development of
artistic crafts that influence the formation and decoration of interior space.
The evolution of crafts from a purely utilitarian activity to a form of
decorative and applied art used to transform the interior environment by
holistic and functional means is being considered through the lens of subject-
spatial and functional-artistic organization.
Keywords. Art, interior, craft.
1 Introduction
At the various stages of societal development, the interior not only served as a special
expression to reflect the language of the architects and builders, but also as a canvas for the
talent of various artisans such as potter-ceramists, glassblowers, metalworkers, carpenters,
and weavers. Weaving reached the highest levels of artistic professionalism along with such
arts as painting and sculpture [1, 2]. The practice grew gradually in correlation with the
emergence of more refined and specialied tools and artisans such as Gobelin, Jacquard,
Wedgwood and many others have given their names to various products – carpets, fabrics,
ceramics and the like, turning the ordinary into artistic [3].
The aim of this article is to show, using some of the most characteristic historical
examples, that various crafts such as stonemasonry, carpentry, pottery, stained glass making,
weaving, etc. played a significant role in forming interiors for various functional purposes:
religious, public and residential, along with purely decorative aspects that arise and develop
in the historical and artistic sequence [4].
The order and type of the selected examples presented in this article are not indicative of
importance, but rather demonstrate the role of mastery in their consecutive artistic
environments [5].
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Research methods
The tasks set in the article defined a methodical apparatus based on the most progressive
methods of conducting research. Among the methods identified are:
Corresponding author:la_mur@rambler.ru
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
E3S Web of Conferences 274, 01029 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401029
STCCE – 2021
- chronological and technological systematisation of crafts that have found their
application in interior decoration;
- highlighting the main stages for the formation of artistic crafts;
- analysis of the most characteristic techniques and methods of artistic interior decoration,
taking into account the formation and evolution of the crafts themselves;
- identification of the factors that determined the formation of stylistic features in
functionally diverse interiors;
- justification of the main stages of crafts’ influence on the formation of technology for
interior decoration.
3 Results and discussion
It can be argued that weaving has been among the earliest forms of craft used for interior
decorating. Beginning with simple stripes and cells, then developing into more complex
patterns, weaving has been used to create a range of craft items, wicker products, woollen
blankets, and carpets, to name a few [6, 7]. The creation of fabrics from multi-coloured,
natural fibres prompted people to develop patterns through interweaving-coloured threads.
Some of the earliest examples of weaving have come from ancient Egypt. A linen shroud
made using the rep-weave technique with scarabs and lotus patterns was found in the tomb
of Thutmose IV (1400 BC). Tapestry weaving is also to be found in ancient Greece, where
Athena was considered to be the patroness of weaving. In Peru, the earliest examples of
tapestry weaving were made of wool and cotton, dating back to 2500 BC [8].
The Middle Ages brought the decoration of the walls with woven canvases – trellised on
the cold interiors of castles and temples. The earliest European tapestry of the Middle Ages,
from the church of St. Gereon in Cologne, was made by Rhine weavers in the 11th century.
Some of its motives are images of fantastic animals and plants. Monumentality, flat image,
bright yet limited colours are characteristic of the tapestries of this era, often commissioned
by churches [9, 10]. The backgrounds were smooth, and the images were simple geometric
patterns and heraldic images. During this time in northern Europe, tapestries were not only
used for the decoration of cathedral walls, castles and palaces, but also kept these buildings
warm and protected them from drafts.
The tradition of creating tapestries from the paintings of great artists started in Flanders
in the fifteenth century [11]. Local weavers had a modest palette of only six colours from
which to work, but were able to achieve striking pictorial effects using etching techniques
and a special weaving technique known as hatching.
Over time, woven items were used more and more diversely in various interior functions:
in the upholstery and decoration of furniture, in the decoration of walls, as well as doors and
windows, and in the form of carpets on the walls and floors [12].
In the 16th and 17th centuries, huge sums of money were spent on furnishing interiors with
fabrics and fringes. Walls were being adorned with luxurious silk and velvet panels with
embroidery or fringed edges, and beds and chairs were being upholstered in rich fabrics [13].
Fabrics for furniture upholstery formed complete ornamental compositions, taking into
account the overall dimensions of the furniture as well as the furniture pillows, as each of them
was considered to be an independent element of the textile composition [14]. The grand beds
of Versailles decorated with rich flowing bedspreads (1672) were designed by Jean Bérain. The
bed, made especially for the wedding day of Jacob II (fig.1), was made of simple geometric
shapes, decorated with very expensive fabrics, and draped with a decorative canopy [15].
Fig. 1. Bed made especially for the wedding day of Jacob II [15].
Interestingly, the interior of the palace carriage of Karl XI of Sweden was also decorated
using fabrics richly embroidered by a royal upholster.
From these examples, it can be easily seen that woven products played a significant role
in the formation of interiors throughout a range of architectural instances.
No less significant than weaving, is carpentry, in crafting artistic and decorative interiors
through means such as intarsia, inlay, and marquetry [16, 17]. These methods are
predominately used for the decoration of furniture and interior surfaces.
In the tomb of Tutankhamun (about 1300 BC), chairs, beds, and other everyday objects
were found. Even with minimal use of décor, these objects are examples of exquisite style
and form, being an excellent representation of the carpentry of the time [18].
During the late Middle Ages in Europe, the Gothic style of architecture began to
demonstrate an extensive use of carpentry for decoration by very skilled artisans. Their skills
and the quality of their craft can be seen to have improved significantly over earlier times, as
seen by the use of carved wood-panel walls that decorated residential premises. This type of
decoration was typical for regions rich in timber [19,20].
The carved wood-panels were complemented with furniture. Wooden benches were
widely used in early Gothic cathedrals in France. Wooden thrones and chairs with solid
frames were inlaid with openwork carvings [21].
By the middle of the 16th century, carpentry reached its highest level of development in the areas
of Germany, Austria, and Switzerland (fig. 2). The most characteristic carving techniques of these
regions were «linen folds» imitating the folds of actual fabric, and varieties of floral
ornamentation.
Later, during the Renaissance, Baroque and Empire periods, carpentry was widely used in
furniture making for various functional purposes in combination with such types of
woodworking as intarsia and marquetry. Thereby, carpenters’ skills reached such a high level
that the silver furniture made for the famous Hall of Mirrors in Versailles Palace, made
according to Jean Bérain’s sketches, was replaced by wooden furniture decorated with gilding.
2
E3S Web of Conferences 274, 01029 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401029
STCCE – 2021
- chronological and technological systematisation of crafts that have found their
application in interior decoration;
- highlighting the main stages for the formation of artistic crafts;
- analysis of the most characteristic techniques and methods of artistic interior decoration,
taking into account the formation and evolution of the crafts themselves;
- identification of the factors that determined the formation of stylistic features in
functionally diverse interiors;
- justification of the main stages of crafts’ influence on the formation of technology for
interior decoration.
3 Results and discussion
It can be argued that weaving has been among the earliest forms of craft used for interior
decorating. Beginning with simple stripes and cells, then developing into more complex
patterns, weaving has been used to create a range of craft items, wicker products, woollen
blankets, and carpets, to name a few [6, 7]. The creation of fabrics from multi-coloured,
natural fibres prompted people to develop patterns through interweaving-coloured threads.
Some of the earliest examples of weaving have come from ancient Egypt. A linen shroud
made using the rep-weave technique with scarabs and lotus patterns was found in the tomb
of Thutmose IV (1400 BC). Tapestry weaving is also to be found in ancient Greece, where
Athena was considered to be the patroness of weaving. In Peru, the earliest examples of
tapestry weaving were made of wool and cotton, dating back to 2500 BC [8].
The Middle Ages brought the decoration of the walls with woven canvases – trellised on
the cold interiors of castles and temples. The earliest European tapestry of the Middle Ages,
from the church of St. Gereon in Cologne, was made by Rhine weavers in the 11th century.
Some of its motives are images of fantastic animals and plants. Monumentality, flat image,
bright yet limited colours are characteristic of the tapestries of this era, often commissioned
by churches [9, 10]. The backgrounds were smooth, and the images were simple geometric
patterns and heraldic images. During this time in northern Europe, tapestries were not only
used for the decoration of cathedral walls, castles and palaces, but also kept these buildings
warm and protected them from drafts.
The tradition of creating tapestries from the paintings of great artists started in Flanders
in the fifteenth century [11]. Local weavers had a modest palette of only six colours from
which to work, but were able to achieve striking pictorial effects using etching techniques
and a special weaving technique known as hatching.
Over time, woven items were used more and more diversely in various interior functions:
in the upholstery and decoration of furniture, in the decoration of walls, as well as doors and
windows, and in the form of carpets on the walls and floors [12].
In the 16th and 17th centuries, huge sums of money were spent on furnishing interiors with
fabrics and fringes. Walls were being adorned with luxurious silk and velvet panels with
embroidery or fringed edges, and beds and chairs were being upholstered in rich fabrics [13].
Fabrics for furniture upholstery formed complete ornamental compositions, taking into
account the overall dimensions of the furniture as well as the furniture pillows, as each of them
was considered to be an independent element of the textile composition [14]. The grand beds
of Versailles decorated with rich flowing bedspreads (1672) were designed by Jean Bérain. The
bed, made especially for the wedding day of Jacob II (fig.1), was made of simple geometric
shapes, decorated with very expensive fabrics, and draped with a decorative canopy [15].
Fig. 1. Bed made especially for the wedding day of Jacob II [15].
Interestingly, the interior of the palace carriage of Karl XI of Sweden was also decorated
using fabrics richly embroidered by a royal upholster.
From these examples, it can be easily seen that woven products played a significant role
in the formation of interiors throughout a range of architectural instances.
No less significant than weaving, is carpentry, in crafting artistic and decorative interiors
through means such as intarsia, inlay, and marquetry [16, 17]. These methods are
predominately used for the decoration of furniture and interior surfaces.
In the tomb of Tutankhamun (about 1300 BC), chairs, beds, and other everyday objects
were found. Even with minimal use of décor, these objects are examples of exquisite style
and form, being an excellent representation of the carpentry of the time [18].
During the late Middle Ages in Europe, the Gothic style of architecture began to
demonstrate an extensive use of carpentry for decoration by very skilled artisans. Their skills
and the quality of their craft can be seen to have improved significantly over earlier times, as
seen by the use of carved wood-panel walls that decorated residential premises. This type of
decoration was typical for regions rich in timber [19,20].
The carved wood-panels were complemented with furniture. Wooden benches were
widely used in early Gothic cathedrals in France. Wooden thrones and chairs with solid
frames were inlaid with openwork carvings [21].
By the middle of the 16th century, carpentry reached its highest level of development in the areas
of Germany, Austria, and Switzerland (fig. 2). The most characteristic carving techniques of these
regions were «linen folds» imitating the folds of actual fabric, and varieties of floral
ornamentation.
Later, during the Renaissance, Baroque and Empire periods, carpentry was widely used in
furniture making for various functional purposes in combination with such types of
woodworking as intarsia and marquetry. Thereby, carpenters’ skills reached such a high level
that the silver furniture made for the famous Hall of Mirrors in Versailles Palace, made
according to Jean Bérain’s sketches, was replaced by wooden furniture decorated with gilding.
3
E3S Web of Conferences 274, 01029 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401029
STCCE – 2021
Fig. 2. Living room from the time of Henry VI, early 16th century [21].
Despite the limited variety of furniture, wooden furniture was attractive due to its
craftsmanship. Wooden chairs, tables, and dressers were finished with varnish, gilding, or
supplemented with inlay [22]. The number of professional methods for achieving these vivid
decorative effects increased. Oak and walnut were used most often, while pine and beech
were used in special cases with gilded or decorative elements.
The Rococo style, known for pompous and excessive décor, in architecture, as well as
interior design, developed the carpentry craft into an independent decorative art. The chairs
were designed and assembled by carpenters [23]. Decorations were carved by specialists who
either had qualifications in sculpture or those who had woodcarving skills.
The importance of master carpenters’ skills became apparent in the forms of the
Biedermeier furniture, in the relatively short period of its existence, which demonstrates the
beauty of both framework and decoration at the same time [24]. The characteristic features of
this style of furniture are laconicism and elegance of form. Dainty forms and beautiful materials,
as well as excellent craftsmanship, are the main dignities of the Biedermeier style. The various
pieces of furniture created by Michael Thonet are examples of this. The No. 14 chair known as
the «Viennese chair» in the history of furniture is still the benchmark of this style [25, 26].
Any type of craft leaves vivid examples of craftsmanship in history, developing and
transforming over time. A great example of this can be seen through stonemasonry, apparent
in many different interior styles of ethnic cultures.
The interiors of the Capilla de Villaviciosa in Córdoba (785, Spain) and the Alhambra
Palace in Granada (1354-1391, Spain) built in the late Gothic period, are striking examples
of stonemasons' exquisite craftsmanship [27]. The delicate openwork patterns of various
arches can hardly be perceived as made of stone. Columns supported arches of red and white
stone in the immense hall of the Great Mosque of Córdoba. The columns’ capitals were
decorated with abstract carvings. Artistic carvings of the capitals and striped arches were the
only decorative elements of the interior.
The art of stonemasonry has played an important role in the formation and development
of French and English Gothic interiors. Gothic Architecture was characterised by different
techniques that transformed over the course of its development. Each of the periods of Gothic
style development, either Early Gothic (1140-1250), High Gothic (1194-1400) or Late Gothic
(1350-1550) have striking interior solutions for cathedrals and churches [28].
Gothic interiors are mainly comprised of three parallel structural spaces of naves, columns
and a lancet arch resting above, but they represent countless design solutions and types of
artistic expression, turning them into the main artistic interior decoration by virtue of the
stonemasons’ mastery [29]. The trunks of the columns consist of several separate verticals
and the lancet arches’ nervures interweaving to create the impression of graceful rapports,
built according to ornamental arrangement principle, while also performing a constructive
role. The interiors of Notre-Dame d'Amiens Cathedral (1220-1288, Amiens, France), Saint-
Maclou Church (1463-1520, Rouen, France), as well as the Chartres, Beauvais and Bourges
Cathedrals are representative of this High Gothic period [30].
The Chapel of Henry VII in Westminster Abbey (London, 1503-1519) is considered to
be the most exquisite example of the Gothic style in England. The stone nervures of the
chapel were embellished with decorative tracery that made the stone look like the thinnest
and finest lace. The interior of King's College Chapel at Cambridge (1446-1515, London) is
another fine example of Gothic architecture [31]. The fan vaulting and walls filled with
soaring stained-glass windows made stone structures look weightless.
While speaking of the Gothic style, it is impossible not to mention the skill of stained-
glass artisans. The aforementioned Notre-Dame de Chartres Cathedral is decorated with an
exquisite composition of stained-glass windows, consisting of a large central rose window
with a diameter of 12 m and five lancet windows below it [32].
The emergence of technology for producing sheet glass with the addition of various
pigments made it possible not only to illuminate the interiors of cathedrals more fully, but
also to give the interiors unexpected colour solutions. Therefore, the walls on the second level
of the royal chapel of Sainte-Chapelle (1242-1248, Paris) were replaced with slender pillars
which made it possible to fill all the freed-up space with stained glass windows. As a result,
the interior makes an impression of the space filled with multiple colours.
Interior glass became popular during the Baroque and Rococo periods and on [33]. The
unusual use of mirrored glass emphasises the splendour of the Palazzo Colonna Gallery in
Rome (fig.3) where the mirrored surfaces were painted with elegant floral ornaments, as if to
continue the paintings on the ceiling.
The emergence of a wide variety of engraving and glass carving contributed to the use of
glass as a leading material for all kinds of lamp manufacturing [34]. During the Neoclassical
period, lead glass production began to increase as a material for lamps. Lead glass was
actively used in the manufacturing of candelabra, having a greater ability to refract and
diffuse light as well as better reflecting either sun or flame [35]. In this case, not only the
colourless, but also the coloured glass was used, most often cobalt.
The craft of forging and casting can seem, at first glance, to be quite removed from the
sphere of interior decoration. However, luxurious cast silver frames, framing mirrors, pieces
of furniture, lamps and interior accessories are produced by masters in forging and casting
for Baroque and Rococo interiors [36].
A special place is occupied by products made using the Kasli casting technology. Kasli
casting is a branch of the Russian art industry for casting iron products. A special composition
of iron is being used for castling as it is viscous and allows for subtle and complex castings
with accuracy and quality surface finish.
Artistic casting originated in the Urals in the village of Kasli, in the first half of the 19th
century at the copper smelter founded by Nikita Demidov in the middle of the 18th century,
where a wide variety of products were produced before the revolution: all kinds of household
items, for example, cauldrons, bowls, decorative dishes, vases with relief and openwork
ornaments, table sculptures, and architectural details.
4
E3S Web of Conferences 274, 01029 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401029
STCCE – 2021
Fig. 2. Living room from the time of Henry VI, early 16th century [21].
Despite the limited variety of furniture, wooden furniture was attractive due to its
craftsmanship. Wooden chairs, tables, and dressers were finished with varnish, gilding, or
supplemented with inlay [22]. The number of professional methods for achieving these vivid
decorative effects increased. Oak and walnut were used most often, while pine and beech
were used in special cases with gilded or decorative elements.
The Rococo style, known for pompous and excessive décor, in architecture, as well as
interior design, developed the carpentry craft into an independent decorative art. The chairs
were designed and assembled by carpenters [23]. Decorations were carved by specialists who
either had qualifications in sculpture or those who had woodcarving skills.
The importance of master carpenters’ skills became apparent in the forms of the
Biedermeier furniture, in the relatively short period of its existence, which demonstrates the
beauty of both framework and decoration at the same time [24]. The characteristic features of
this style of furniture are laconicism and elegance of form. Dainty forms and beautiful materials,
as well as excellent craftsmanship, are the main dignities of the Biedermeier style. The various
pieces of furniture created by Michael Thonet are examples of this. The No. 14 chair known as
the «Viennese chair» in the history of furniture is still the benchmark of this style [25, 26].
Any type of craft leaves vivid examples of craftsmanship in history, developing and
transforming over time. A great example of this can be seen through stonemasonry, apparent
in many different interior styles of ethnic cultures.
The interiors of the Capilla de Villaviciosa in Córdoba (785, Spain) and the Alhambra
Palace in Granada (1354-1391, Spain) built in the late Gothic period, are striking examples
of stonemasons' exquisite craftsmanship [27]. The delicate openwork patterns of various
arches can hardly be perceived as made of stone. Columns supported arches of red and white
stone in the immense hall of the Great Mosque of Córdoba. The columns’ capitals were
decorated with abstract carvings. Artistic carvings of the capitals and striped arches were the
only decorative elements of the interior.
The art of stonemasonry has played an important role in the formation and development
of French and English Gothic interiors. Gothic Architecture was characterised by different
techniques that transformed over the course of its development. Each of the periods of Gothic
style development, either Early Gothic (1140-1250), High Gothic (1194-1400) or Late Gothic
(1350-1550) have striking interior solutions for cathedrals and churches [28].
Gothic interiors are mainly comprised of three parallel structural spaces of naves, columns
and a lancet arch resting above, but they represent countless design solutions and types of
artistic expression, turning them into the main artistic interior decoration by virtue of the
stonemasons’ mastery [29]. The trunks of the columns consist of several separate verticals
and the lancet arches’ nervures interweaving to create the impression of graceful rapports,
built according to ornamental arrangement principle, while also performing a constructive
role. The interiors of Notre-Dame d'Amiens Cathedral (1220-1288, Amiens, France), Saint-
Maclou Church (1463-1520, Rouen, France), as well as the Chartres, Beauvais and Bourges
Cathedrals are representative of this High Gothic period [30].
The Chapel of Henry VII in Westminster Abbey (London, 1503-1519) is considered to
be the most exquisite example of the Gothic style in England. The stone nervures of the
chapel were embellished with decorative tracery that made the stone look like the thinnest
and finest lace. The interior of King's College Chapel at Cambridge (1446-1515, London) is
another fine example of Gothic architecture [31]. The fan vaulting and walls filled with
soaring stained-glass windows made stone structures look weightless.
While speaking of the Gothic style, it is impossible not to mention the skill of stained-
glass artisans. The aforementioned Notre-Dame de Chartres Cathedral is decorated with an
exquisite composition of stained-glass windows, consisting of a large central rose window
with a diameter of 12 m and five lancet windows below it [32].
The emergence of technology for producing sheet glass with the addition of various
pigments made it possible not only to illuminate the interiors of cathedrals more fully, but
also to give the interiors unexpected colour solutions. Therefore, the walls on the second level
of the royal chapel of Sainte-Chapelle (1242-1248, Paris) were replaced with slender pillars
which made it possible to fill all the freed-up space with stained glass windows. As a result,
the interior makes an impression of the space filled with multiple colours.
Interior glass became popular during the Baroque and Rococo periods and on [33]. The
unusual use of mirrored glass emphasises the splendour of the Palazzo Colonna Gallery in
Rome (fig.3) where the mirrored surfaces were painted with elegant floral ornaments, as if to
continue the paintings on the ceiling.
The emergence of a wide variety of engraving and glass carving contributed to the use of
glass as a leading material for all kinds of lamp manufacturing [34]. During the Neoclassical
period, lead glass production began to increase as a material for lamps. Lead glass was
actively used in the manufacturing of candelabra, having a greater ability to refract and
diffuse light as well as better reflecting either sun or flame [35]. In this case, not only the
colourless, but also the coloured glass was used, most often cobalt.
The craft of forging and casting can seem, at first glance, to be quite removed from the
sphere of interior decoration. However, luxurious cast silver frames, framing mirrors, pieces
of furniture, lamps and interior accessories are produced by masters in forging and casting
for Baroque and Rococo interiors [36].
A special place is occupied by products made using the Kasli casting technology. Kasli
casting is a branch of the Russian art industry for casting iron products. A special composition
of iron is being used for castling as it is viscous and allows for subtle and complex castings
with accuracy and quality surface finish.
Artistic casting originated in the Urals in the village of Kasli, in the first half of the 19th
century at the copper smelter founded by Nikita Demidov in the middle of the 18th century,
where a wide variety of products were produced before the revolution: all kinds of household
items, for example, cauldrons, bowls, decorative dishes, vases with relief and openwork
ornaments, table sculptures, and architectural details.
5
E3S Web of Conferences 274, 01029 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401029
STCCE – 2021
The Kasli cast-iron pavilion made for The Exposition Universelle held in Paris in 1900
occupies a special place among the products made at the Kasli plant. The pavilion, designed
by the architect Eugene Baumgarten was an openwork cast-iron room, where about 1.5
thousand of the best samples of ‘cabinet’ items of Kasli casting were exhibited: sculpture,
candlesticks, openwork vases and plates, boxes, writing instruments. These products were
awarded a gold medal and the Grand Prix of the exhibition.
Fig. 3. Henry VII Chapel (Westminster Abbey, London, 1503-1519) [33].
In London, at the Shropshire metal factory, they began to cast iron furniture using foliage
patterns inspired by Gothic forms, based on Dresser's sketches from the mid-19th century.
Perhaps, pottery could be attributed to being one of the most ancient and most diverse crafts
in its application to interior spaces [37]. These include ceramic tiles for floors and walls,
ceramics such as wall dishes from the Renaissance, vases and porcelain miniatures, mosaic
panels and even interiors completely made using the mosaic technique (Ravenna Mosaics
heritage, 400-500 AD), special ceramic tiles intended for facing stoves, unique products made
of porcelain and faience, including unique porcelain iconostases in Orthodox churches.
4 Conclusion
Pottery products have an ancient history that is still legitimate and relevant in modern
interiors, thanks to the latest production technologies, from miniatures to large panels.
The examples of interior formation considered in this article are intended to demonstrate
the role and importance of particular types of crafts in the process of creating a subject-artistic
environment, taking into account the historical aspect of the art and development throughout
architectural styles.
Each of the considered examples, however limited, are, in the authors’ opinion,
representative and convincing examples revealing the main thesis of this article, that speak
to the role and significance of applied crafts in interior design
References
1. B.A. Vvedensky. Bolshaya Sovetckaya Encyclopedia, second edition 13, 610 (1952).
2. A. Aronov. Art of Westaern Europe (architecture abroad XIX-XX centuries), 413
(2003).
3. N. Riley. Elements of design. Development of design and style elements from the
Renaissance to Postmodernism, 546 (2004).
4. C. Kèlouèj. Style elements. Encyclopedia of architectural details, 592 (2006).
5. J.F. Pyle.Interior Design. 6000 years of history, 612 (2018).
6. S. Adams.Guide to style «Arts and Crafts Movement», 128 (2000).
7. S. Mikhailov, A. Mikhailova, N. Nadyrshine. Multilinear approach to representing the
historical evolution of urban design (industrial and post-industrial periods, IOP
Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 890, (012006) (2020). DOI:
10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012006.
8. R. Cooper. Design research – Its 50-year transformation, Design Studies 65, 6-17 (2019).
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.002.
9. K. Dorst. Co-evolution and emergence in design, Design Studies 65, 60-77 (2019). DOI:
10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.005.
10. John S. Gero. Nascent directions for design creativity research, International Journal of
Design Creativity and Innovation 8 (3), 144-146 (2020). DOI: 10.1080/21650349.
2020.1767885.
11. B. van Berkel. Architecture and the Impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution,
Architectural design 90 (5), 126-133 (2020). DOI: 10.1002/ad.2619.
12. M. Taylor. Time Matters: Transition and Transformation in Architecture. Architectural
design, Special Issue: Architecture Timed: Designing with Time in Mind 86 (1), 42-49
(2016). DOI: 10.1002/ad.2000.
13. M. Bressani. The Performative Character of Style. Architectural Histories 6 (1), 15
(2018). DOI: 10.5334/ah.322.
14. M. Quinn, Design, History & Time, Journal of Design History 33 (2), 189-191 (2020).
DOI: 10.1093/jdh/epaa002.
15. L. Skipper. The Evolution of Wallpaper Interior Design Schemes in a Commercial
Setting: The Interiors of the St Pancras Renaissance Hotel (Midland Grand Hotel),
London 1870-1980s, Journal of Design History 30 (3), 315-334 (2017). DOI:
10.1093/jdh/epw039.
16. T. Otto. History in and For Design, Journal of Design History 29 (1), 58-70 (2016). DOI:
10.1093/jdh/epv044.
17. A. Popp, R. Holt, Josiah Wedgwood, Manufacturing and Craft, Journal of Design History
29 (2), 99-119 (2016). DOI: 10.1093/jdh/epv048.
18. M. Amah Edoh, Redrawing Power? Dutch Wax Cloth and the Politics of «Good Design»,
Journal of Design History 29 (3), 258-272 (2016). DOI: 10.1093/jdh/epw011.
19. S. Ruecker, J. Roberts-Smith. Design Research: Objects, Procedures, and New
Understanding, Technology, Architecture + Design 2 (1), 11-14 (2018). DOI:
10.1080/24751448.2018.1420959.
6
E3S Web of Conferences 274, 01029 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401029
STCCE – 2021
The Kasli cast-iron pavilion made for The Exposition Universelle held in Paris in 1900
occupies a special place among the products made at the Kasli plant. The pavilion, designed
by the architect Eugene Baumgarten was an openwork cast-iron room, where about 1.5
thousand of the best samples of ‘cabinet’ items of Kasli casting were exhibited: sculpture,
candlesticks, openwork vases and plates, boxes, writing instruments. These products were
awarded a gold medal and the Grand Prix of the exhibition.
Fig. 3. Henry VII Chapel (Westminster Abbey, London, 1503-1519) [33].
In London, at the Shropshire metal factory, they began to cast iron furniture using foliage
patterns inspired by Gothic forms, based on Dresser's sketches from the mid-19th century.
Perhaps, pottery could be attributed to being one of the most ancient and most diverse crafts
in its application to interior spaces [37]. These include ceramic tiles for floors and walls,
ceramics such as wall dishes from the Renaissance, vases and porcelain miniatures, mosaic
panels and even interiors completely made using the mosaic technique (Ravenna Mosaics
heritage, 400-500 AD), special ceramic tiles intended for facing stoves, unique products made
of porcelain and faience, including unique porcelain iconostases in Orthodox churches.
4 Conclusion
Pottery products have an ancient history that is still legitimate and relevant in modern
interiors, thanks to the latest production technologies, from miniatures to large panels.
The examples of interior formation considered in this article are intended to demonstrate
the role and importance of particular types of crafts in the process of creating a subject-artistic
environment, taking into account the historical aspect of the art and development throughout
architectural styles.
Each of the considered examples, however limited, are, in the authors’ opinion,
representative and convincing examples revealing the main thesis of this article, that speak
to the role and significance of applied crafts in interior design
References
1. B.A. Vvedensky. Bolshaya Sovetckaya Encyclopedia, second edition 13, 610 (1952).
2. A. Aronov. Art of Westaern Europe (architecture abroad XIX-XX centuries), 413
(2003).
3. N. Riley. Elements of design. Development of design and style elements from the
Renaissance to Postmodernism, 546 (2004).
4. C. Kèlouèj. Style elements. Encyclopedia of architectural details, 592 (2006).
5. J.F. Pyle.Interior Design. 6000 years of history, 612 (2018).
6. S. Adams.Guide to style «Arts and Crafts Movement», 128 (2000).
7. S. Mikhailov, A. Mikhailova, N. Nadyrshine. Multilinear approach to representing the
historical evolution of urban design (industrial and post-industrial periods, IOP
Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 890, (012006) (2020). DOI:
10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012006.
8. R. Cooper. Design research – Its 50-year transformation, Design Studies 65, 6-17 (2019).
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.002.
9. K. Dorst. Co-evolution and emergence in design, Design Studies 65, 60-77 (2019). DOI:
10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.005.
10. John S. Gero. Nascent directions for design creativity research, International Journal of
Design Creativity and Innovation 8 (3), 144-146 (2020). DOI: 10.1080/21650349.
2020.1767885.
11. B. van Berkel. Architecture and the Impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution,
Architectural design 90 (5), 126-133 (2020). DOI: 10.1002/ad.2619.
12. M. Taylor. Time Matters: Transition and Transformation in Architecture. Architectural
design, Special Issue: Architecture Timed: Designing with Time in Mind 86 (1), 42-49
(2016). DOI: 10.1002/ad.2000.
13. M. Bressani. The Performative Character of Style. Architectural Histories 6 (1), 15
(2018). DOI: 10.5334/ah.322.
14. M. Quinn, Design, History & Time, Journal of Design History 33 (2), 189-191 (2020).
DOI: 10.1093/jdh/epaa002.
15. L. Skipper. The Evolution of Wallpaper Interior Design Schemes in a Commercial
Setting: The Interiors of the St Pancras Renaissance Hotel (Midland Grand Hotel),
London 1870-1980s, Journal of Design History 30 (3), 315-334 (2017). DOI:
10.1093/jdh/epw039.
16. T. Otto. History in and For Design, Journal of Design History 29 (1), 58-70 (2016). DOI:
10.1093/jdh/epv044.
17. A. Popp, R. Holt, Josiah Wedgwood, Manufacturing and Craft, Journal of Design History
29 (2), 99-119 (2016). DOI: 10.1093/jdh/epv048.
18. M. Amah Edoh, Redrawing Power? Dutch Wax Cloth and the Politics of «Good Design»,
Journal of Design History 29 (3), 258-272 (2016). DOI: 10.1093/jdh/epw011.
19. S. Ruecker, J. Roberts-Smith. Design Research: Objects, Procedures, and New
Understanding, Technology, Architecture + Design 2 (1), 11-14 (2018). DOI:
10.1080/24751448.2018.1420959.
7
E3S Web of Conferences 274, 01029 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401029
STCCE – 2021
20. А. Kuzminikh, S. Korotkova. Adaptation of the shoreline of urban development to special
environment conditions, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 890
(1), 012019 (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012019.
21. А. Galimullina, S. Korotkova. Adapting the architecture of school buildings in the context
of humanizing the environment, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and
Engineering 890 (1), 012008 (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012008.
22. B.T. Christensen, L.J. Ball. Dimensions of creative evaluation: Distinct design and
reasoning strategies for aesthetic, functional and originality judgments, Design Studies
45 (A), 116-136 (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.005.
23. N. Crilly, R. Moroşanu Firth, Creativity and fixation in the real world: Three case studies
of invention, design and innovation, Design Studies64, 169-212 (2019). DOI:
10.1016/j.destud.2019.07.003.
24. H. Casakin, G.V. Georgiev. Design creativity and the semantic analysis of conversations
in the design studio, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 9 (1), 61-77
(2021). DOI: 10.1080/21650349.2020.1838331.
25. L.D. Busbea. Soft Control Material: Environment and Design c.1970, Journal of Design
History 30 (2), 139-156 (2017). DOI: 10.1080/21650349.2016.1246205.
26. J.A. Stein. Hidden Between Craft and Industry: Engineering Patternmakers’ Design
Knowledge, Journal of Design History 32(3), 280-303 (2019). DOI: 10.1093/jdh/epz012.
27. M. Quinn, Design, History & Time, Journal of Design History 33 (2), 189-191 (2020).
DOI: 10.1093/jdh/epaa002.
28. P. Garvey, A. Drazin.Design Dispersed: Design History, Design Practice and
Anthropology, Journal of Design History 29 (1), 1-7 (2016). DOI: 10.1093/jdh/epv054.
29. A. Popp, R. Holt. Josiah Wedgwood, Manufacturing and Craft, Journal of Design History
29 (1), 99-119 (2016). DOI: 10.1093/jdh/epv048.
30. C.M.E. Guth. Crafting Community: George Nakashima and Modern Design in India,
Journal of Design History 29 (1), 366-384 (2016). DOI: 10.1093/jdh/epw015.
31. S. Mikhailov, R. Khafizov, A. Mikhailova, N. Nadyrshine, L. Nadyrshine. Supergraphics
as a project and artistic method in design of a modern city, IOP Conference Series:
Materials Science and Engineering 890, (012003) (2020). DOI:10.1088/1757-
899X/890/1/012003.
32. A.N. Novikova. Experience of optimization of design process in an example of a real
object in Kazan, Izvestiya KGASU 4 (18), 100-106 (2011).
33. A.F. Ibragimova, A.S. Mikhaylova. Conceptualism in the modern architectural
environment (an example of city sculpture), Izvestiya KGASU 3 (37), 34-40 (2016).
34. I.Z. Saifullina. On the history of interior decoration, Izvestiya KGASU 4 (18), 51-57
(2011).
35. V.A. Elyukhina, I.V. Krasnobaev. On the question of relationship of architecture and
building technologies (upn the materials of foreign publications), Izvestiya KGASU 2
(48), 40-47 (2019).
36. A.R. Lotfullina, I.V. Krasnobaev. On the question of the mutual influence of architectural
design and stage design, Izvestiya KGASU 3 (49),18-26 (2019).
37. D.A. Nadyrova. Profitable houses of Kazan of the end of XIX-beginning XX centuries, as
a multi-functional complex, Izvestiya KGASU 2 (36), 57-63 (2016).
8
E3S Web of Conferences 274, 01029 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401029
STCCE – 2021
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Craft is currently experiencing an academic and popular revival, as evidenced by increasing interest in ‘makers’ and artisanal practices, both within and beyond design history. Yet, in this moment of craft’s resurgence, some aspects are regularly overlooked. Industrial craft in manufacturing, for instance, is a field ripe for closer analysis. Engineering patternmaking is an industrial craft that remains almost invisible in design history, despite the design-related nature of patternmaking, and its centrality to many industrial manufacturing processes. Drawing on oral histories with Australian patternmakers, this article emphasizes that patternmaking is both a manual and intellectual practice that requires thorough knowledge of drawing, materials, geometry, three-dimensional visuality and manufacturing processes planning. Accordingly, I argue that patternmakers possess and enact a specific type of design knowledge, a form of expertise that has thus far been undervalued in both design and craft histories. Making use of Nigel Cross’ influential theorization of ‘designerly ways of knowing’, this article explores the connections and divergences between design and patternmaking knowledge sets, reminding us that the making of manufactured objects is deeply collaborative across professional and class formations. In doing so, I highlight the significance of industrial craft knowledge in the actualization of design. This example has broader historical implications for how design history frames and values the knowledge, skills and influence of those engaged in industrial production.
Article
Full-text available
This article discusses the need for an in-depth approach to studying the adaptation of the coastline of urban development to special natural conditions. In particular, to periodic repeated flooding and floods in areas of contact with the terrain. As well as the types of technologies and materials that are used to form a protective buffer territory of coastal urban development. The importance vector of water management evolves and shifts from barrier structures against floods and underground pipeline drainage to the natural habitat. Retention pools, wetlands, rain gardens and filter trenches are forming within the city. This has a beneficial effect on the state of the coastline itself and on the attractiveness of this recreational park feature of the city for recreation. In studies based on a factor and comparative analysis of the studied projects in tabular form, it was revealed that in the floodplain relief there are carefully options for barrier fencing. The coastline of the urban development as a buffer zone of land and water should meet the safety and comfort requirements of all inhabitants and be attractive in appearance on both sides.
Article
Full-text available
Supergraphics in the city design is considered as a special form of artistic synthesis of graphic design and architecture in the process of organizing the built environment of the city at various levels (urban ensemble, architectural object, subject forms). The main stages in the formation and development of a supergraphic approach in the city design are revealed: atectonic color-graphic compositions in the architectural environment (until the middle of the 20th century), architectural supergraphics (the second half of the 20th century), anamorphic three-dimensional images in the pedestrian zones of cities (21th century.), Autonomous dynamic color and light composition in the architecture and subject-spatial environment of the city (modern time). Current trends in the field of artistic synthesis and the foundations of the formation of a supergraphic approach in the design of a city based on the philosophy of traditional architectural supergraphics and the use of the latest technologies of the information society are outlined.
Article
Full-text available
The concept of “city design” is revealed as a special type of design and art synthesis of architecture, monumental and decorative art, urban planning and landscape design at the level of individual forms, urban spaces and ensembles, as well as the city as a whole. Using a multilinear approach to presenting the history of design, the authors of this article pay special attention to factors affecting the form-finding in design that actively influence it both at the designing stage and also allow us to consider the evolution of design objects in interrelation with political, economic and cultural events in the world. The main stages of the historical development of the design of the city of the industrial and post-industrial periods are considered on the basis of a multilinear approach in the presentation of the historical process, which meets the new concepts and ideals of the post-industrial society with a holistic picture of the worldview. They show the complexity and multidimensionality of the task of representing the history of city design and the need for special studies of this relatively new phenomenon in the general design and art culture of the XX-XXI centuries.
Article
The analysis of conversations during design activity can facilitate deeper insights into design thinking and its relation to creativity. A semantic analysis approach was employed to explore the semantic content of communication and information exchange between students and instructors. The goal was to examine design conversations in terms of abstraction, Polysemy, Information Content, and Semantic Similarity measures, and analyze their relation to the creativity of final solutions. These design outcomes were assessed according to their Originality, Usability, Feasibility, Overall Value, and Overall Creativity. Consequently, 35 design conversations from the 10th Design Thinking Research Symposium (DTRS10) dataset were analyzed. The main results showed that Information Content and Semantic Similarity predicted Originality, and Information Content alone predicted Overall Creativity. Likewise, Abstraction predicted Feasibility, while Semantic Similarity, Information Content, and Polysemy predicted Overall Value. In context of instructors, Semantic Similarity predicted Usability, and Polysemy predicted Feasibility. For students, Semantic Similarity predicted Overall Value. On the whole, Semantic Similarity and Information Content were the most prolific measures, and therefore could be considered for promoting creativity in the design studio. The implications of using support tools such as automated systems are also discussed.
Article
It is apposite that an edited collection dealing with design, history and time has been published in the year that the centenary of the Weimar Bauhaus was the focus of so much attention. The overwhelming focus given to the Bauhaus centenary in 2019 raises a larger question that informs the book as a whole, namely, how should design history engage with the representation of time and the character of the temporal continuum in design? Design, History & Time offers a challenge to design historians. It asks them to consider how assumptions about time as a measure of social value are ‘baked in’ to our thinking about design. It also offers ways to work through these assumptions and fixed representations, by putting a critical analysis of time at the forefront of design history. The temporal conditions of design history itself are addressed in Hendon and Massey’s introduction, which links the development of this book from a Design History Society annual conference, ‘Design and Time’, held at Middlesex University, 8–10 September 2016, to the second conference of Twentieth Century Design History hosted by Middlesex Polytechnic in 1976, which focussed on ‘Leisure in the Twentieth Century’. Linking these two conferences does not so much establish a temporal continuity between 1976 and 2016, as indicate the importance of understanding how time has become a dominant measure of social value since the advent of industrial capitalism. The question of how design history takes ‘capitalist time’ into account dominates the final section of the book on ‘Days, Hours and Seconds’. Toke Riis Ebbesen’s chapter raises the question of how we should describe the Amazon Kindle, which combines a familiar ‘book-sized’ format that can be read in our leisure time, with the promise of delivery in fewer than sixty seconds. The average delivery time is the key indicator that makes Kindle ‘of its time’ and distinct from earlier forms of the book. On these grounds, Ebbesen suggests that we should be wary of promises that the designed object itself is what delivers ‘the new’, by means of artefacts that are offered as emblems of futurity. Stephen Hayward’s chapter charts the difference between the singular and utopian design futures of the twentieth century and the multiple and speculative futures of the twenty-first century. Like Ebbesen, he highlights the problems of objectifying sociality in design objects, with reference to speculative design and ‘slow design’, citing design company Droog’s attempts to socialize rather than objectify the notion of ‘slowness’. ‘Slow design’ is the subject of Niels Peter Skou’s chapter, which refers to the furniture maker Christien Starkenburg as exemplifying a scenario in which the designer becomes the emblem of a ‘slow’ sensibility. Skou argues that the objects that Starkenburg creates are the tokens of a lifestyle that opposes dominant temporal norms, but which does not offer an alternative model of social organization. Also, in the final section of the book, Claire McAndrew’s chapter discusses Archigram’s ‘Plug-In City’ and Cedric Price’s ‘Fun Palace’, both conceived in 1964, as idealistic visions in which human activity rather than monumental architecture dominated design. Nonetheless, what was actually being idealized was not human beings as such, but rather a system and the urban interactions it regulated. David Lawrence’s chapter focusses on the closed system of the London Underground, in which passengers are ‘timed’ by the system. The design of Henry Beck’s tube map, Leslie Green’s station interiors, and Henry Wharton Ford and Frank Pick’s ‘roundel’ all served the goal of delivering a regulated journey time that matched an average calculation.
Article
UNStudio and UNSense founder Ben van Berkel explains the post‐digital symbiotic role that disruptive, embedded data technologies can have in the technologies architects use to design, enabling them to produce more and more tailored buildings that are informed by accurate fed‐back information. Here he uses one of UNSense's housing schemes as an example.
Article
The notion of co-evolution has been widely adopted as a useful descriptor of one of the key aspects of designerly thinking: the re-interpreting of a design problem in the light of an exploration of possible solutions until a good ‘fit’ between problem and solution (‘an idea’) emerges. In this paper we pick up the discussion by considering co-evolution within design projects, in the briefing process and across projects. Aspects of the process to get from problem space to solution space can be captured with design models, but in considering the ‘jump’ from solution space to problem space we enter largely uncharted territory.