A preview of this full-text is provided by Emerald.
Content available from Geotechnique
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Bearing capacity of open caissons embedded in sand
BRIAN SHEILand JACK TEMPLEMAN
Open caissons are an increasingly common means of constructing underground storage and attenuation
tanks as well as launch and reception shafts for tunnel-boring machines. The caisson walls typically
feature atapered base, referred to as the ‘cutting face’, to aid the sinking process by reducing the vertical
soil reaction. The primary aim of this paper is to explore the influence of the caisson cutting face
inclination angle on the vertical soil reaction in sand. Both finite-element limit analysis and finite-
element analysis are adopted for this purpose. The effects of cutting face roughness, external
embedment depth and caisson radius are also investigated. The results show that the influence of the
cutting face inclination angle on the bearing capacity is highly dependent on both the soil friction angle
and the roughness of the cutting face. A reduction in the caisson radius is also shown to cause a
significant increase in the vertical soil reaction. The numerical output is used to inform the development
of a new closed-form analytical approach amenable for use in routine design. The design method is
shown to provide a high-fidelity representation of the numerical output.
KEYWORDS: bearing capacity; caissons; finite-element analysis; sands; shafts
INTRODUCTION
Deep shafts and caissons have a wide range of geotechnical
applications, including foundation solutions, storage and
attenuation tanks (e.g. Royston et al., 2020; Sheil, 2021), and
launch and reception shafts for tunnel-boring machines (e.g.
O’Dwyer et al., 2018, 2020; Phillips et al., 2019; Cheng et al.,
2020). A common construction procedure is to ‘sink’
monolithic reinforced concrete caissons into the ground
using the self-weight of the caisson walls. A key feature of the
caisson wall cross-section is a tapered base, typically known
as the ‘cutting face’. This resembles an inclined ring footing
and is used to promote sinking by reducing the vertical
bearing resistance of the soil (Royston et al., 2021). An
accurate estimation of this resistance is an essential element
of the design process: overestimation can lead to uncontrolled
and dangerous sinking, whereas underestimation can result
in failure to reach formation level (Sheil et al., 2018).
The widely used Terzaghi (1943) bearing capacity theory
provides the following expression for calculating the bearing
capacity of a strip footing
V=A¼cNcþqNqþ1
2γBNγð1Þ
where Vis the vertical bearing capacity force; Ais the footing
area; cis the soil cohesion; qis the surrounding surcharge; γis
the unit weight of the soil; Bis the width of the footing; and
N
c
,N
q
and N
γ
are the dimensionless bearing capacity factors
providing the contributions of c,qand γ, respectively. Many
investigators have sought to develop more accurate solutions
for the bearing capacity factors using numerical techniques
such as finite-element analysis (FEA; Goss & Griffiths, 2001;
Gourvenec, 2007; Georgiadis, 2010), method of character-
istics (e.g. Houlsby & Martin, 2003; Smith, 2005) and
finite-element limit analysis (FELA; Merifield et al., 1999;
Salgado et al., 2004; Lyamin et al., 2007; Sloan, 2013).
Equation (1) is typically extended to footings founded
below the ground surface and/or subjected to oblique loads
through the use of additional depth and load inclination
factors, respectively –for example, Meyerhof (1951, 1963),
Hansen (1970), De Beer (1970), Vesic (1973), Sastry &
Meyerhof (1987) and Van Baars (2014). Similarly, ‘shape’
factors have been used to compute the bearing capacity of
foundations with alternative geometries –for example,
Michalowski (2001), Lyamin et al. (2007), Gourvenec
(2007) and Taiebat & Carter (2010).
The vertical bearing capacity of ring footings has been
studied using various experimental and numerical techniques
in both cohesionless (e.g. Saha, 1978; Boushehrian & Hataf,
2003; Saran et al., 2003; Kumar & Ghosh, 2005; Zhao &
Wang, 2008; Choobbasti et al., 2010; Benmebarek et al.,
2012) and cohesive soils (e.g. Lee et al., 2016; Benmebarek
et al., 2017). However, the influence of the footing inclination
angle on the bearing capacity has received much less
attention. Hansen (1970) documented one of the earliest
uses of ‘base factors’to modify the Terzaghi bearing capacity
equation to account for the influence of an inclined footing
base. More recently, Royston et al. (2016) and Chavda et al.
(2019) have explored the influence of the base inclination
angle on ring footings embedded in sand for open caisson
applications, using small-scale laboratory testing. While
Royston et al. (2021) presented updated design calculations
for the bearing capacity of a caisson cutting face in
clay, similar design methods for cohesionless soils do not
exist.
To address these uncertainties, the current paper presents
the results of a suite of FELA calculations of the vertical
penetration behaviour of a caisson cutting face in drained
soil. Parameters considered in the modelling include the soil
friction angle, the inclination and roughness of the caisson
cutting face, the external embedment depth and the caisson
radius. A limited number of FEA calculations were also
undertaken to explore the influence of soil non-associativity
on the vertical bearing capacity. The FELA output is used to
inform the development of closed-form analytical
expressions amenable for use in routine design.
Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford,
Oxford, UK.
Manuscript received 4 May 2021; revised manuscript accepted
20 August 2021. First published online ahead of print 15 November
2021.
Discussion on this paper closes on 1 October 2023, for further details
see p. ii.
Sheil, B. & Templeman, J. (2023). Géotechnique 73, No. 6, 495–505 [https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.21.00089]
495