Content uploaded by Brendon Ferrier
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Brendon Ferrier on Jun 10, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of
Environmental Research
and Public Health
Article
A Mixed Methods Exploration of Surf Therapy Piloted for
Youth Well-Being in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone
Jamie Marshall 1, * , Sallu Kamuskay 2, Michaella Margaedah Samai 2, Isha Marah 3, Fanta Tonkara 4,
Josephine Conteh 5, Sullayman Keita 6, Oullematu Jalloh 6, Mohamed Missalie 4, Mohamed Bangura 5,
Olufemi Messeh-Leone 3, Messeh Leone 7, Brendon Ferrier 1and Russell Martindale 1
Citation: Marshall, J.; Kamuskay, S.;
Samai, M.M.; Marah, I.; Tonkara, F.;
Conteh, J.; Keita, S.; Jalloh, O.;
Missalie, M.; Bangura, M.; et al. A
Mixed Methods Exploration of Surf
Therapy Piloted for Youth Well-Being
in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone. Int. J.
Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18,
6267. https://doi.org/10.3390/
ijerph18126267
Academic Editor: Cheng-Fang Yen
Received: 12 April 2021
Accepted: 4 June 2021
Published: 10 June 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, 9 Sighthill Court, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, UK;
b.ferrier@napier.ac.uk (B.F.); r.martindale@napier.ac.uk (R.M.)
2United Sierra Leone, 9 York Road, Sussex Beach, Freetown, Sierra Leone; sallukamuskay@gmail.com (S.K.);
Mworldsafe001@gmail.com (M.M.S.)
3
Pipul Pikin Foundation, 60 Maxwell Street, Wellington, Freetown, Sierra Leone; pipulpikin@gmail.com (I.M.);
salonemessenger@gmail.com (O.M.-L.)
4
Moseray Fadika Trust Foundation, 154 Wilkinson Road, Freetown, Sierra Leone; teamfadika@gmail.com (F.T.);
missalie7@gmail.com (M.M.)
5Job Opportunities for Youth (JOY), JOY Centre, 38 White Street, Tokeh Beach, Freetown, Sierra Leone;
joycentre.sl@gmail.com (J.C.); mohamedsbangura@gmail.com (M.B.)
6Young Leaders Sierra Leone, AYV House, 3 Wesley Street, Tower Hill, Freetown, Sierra Leone;
theyoungleaders.sl@gmail.com (S.K.); oullematuprincessjalloh@gmail.com (O.J.)
7The Messeh Leone Trust, Malaika Chambers, 17 Off Kingharman Road, Freetown, Sierra Leone;
messehproject@gmail.com
*Correspondence: james.marshall@napier.ac.uk; Tel.: +44-7-941-484-587
Abstract:
Young people in post-conflict and post-epidemic contexts such as Sierra Leone face a
range of mental health challenges as part of their daily life. An innovative approach to Sport for
Development that could offer support to youth mental health is surf therapy. This research used
an uncontrolled mixed methods approach to explore surf therapy pilots run by five youth-focused
and community development organizations around Freetown. Four sites provided useable pre/post
data using the Stirling Children’s Well-Being Scale (n= 58, average age = 12.9). Three sites were
associated with significant (p< 0.017) large effects (r= 0.65–0.84) on participant well-being. One site
was associated with a non-significant (p< 0.380) small negative effect (r=
−
0.22). A synthesis of
qualitative data within the five evaluations triangulated with quantitative findings and provided
important context in terms of challenges to service delivery. This included low attendance as a
plausible mediator for why one site saw very different results than other sites. Combined, these
processes highlight the need for future research exploring possible dose-response relationships in
surf therapy. This study also provides a foundation for more rigorous research in the future. These
promising findings support continued and optimized delivery of surf therapy in Sierra Leone to
support youth mental health.
Keywords: surf therapy; mental health; sport for development; mixed methods; evaluation
1. Introduction
Armed conflict such as civil war has been associated, both directly and indirectly, with
negative mental health among children and young people [
1
]. The intergenerational nature
of conflict-induced negative mental health means it lasts long after conflicts have officially
ended and in fact spreads within family dynamics [
2
]. This means young people who took
no active part in historical conflicts are still experiencing associated negative mental health.
Between 1991 and 2002, the West African country of Sierra Leone experienced devastat-
ing civil war, defined by widespread human rights abuses and collapsing infrastructure.
During this conflict, nearly 7000 children are believed to have been recruited as child
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 6267. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126267 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 6267 2 of 11
soldiers [
3
]. The country also experienced an Ebola epidemic between 2014 and 2016 that
killed nearly 4000 people [
4
], with a compounding negative impact on mental health [
5
].
Priority areas for improving youth mental health in Sierra Leone have previously been
identified as improving positive peer support, delivering effective coping/self-regulation
skills and knowledge, and providing alternatives to risky behaviors [
6
]. The Messeh Leone
Trust (https://www.messehleone.org/ (accessed on 5 June 2021)) recently brought together
a collection of youth and community development organizations in Sierra Leone to pilot
surf therapy within Sierra Leone and specifically address these priority areas.
Surf therapy in Sierra Leone is an example of Sport for Development (SfD), with
an explicit focus on mental health and well-being. There remains a lack of rigorous
evidence pertaining to the efficacy of SfD [
7
,
8
], including SfD’s effectiveness in supporting
positive mental health in post-conflict contexts [
9
]. Despite the lack of rigorous evidence
around SfD in supporting post-conflict youth mental health, promising results can be
seen within organizational evaluations and other non-peer reviewed materials. A recent
review of the evidence on the effectiveness of surf therapy, including supporting youth
mental health, was encouraging [
10
] but was hampered by a lack of rigor, especially in
terms of control groups and sample sizes. No research has been carried out into the
effectiveness or associated impact of surf therapy for youth mental health within post-
conflict settings. Further research is required to determine the effectiveness and associated
impact claims, both for surf therapy and within the wider SfD paradigm, especially around
youth mental health.
The only research that has currently been carried out on surf therapy within the post-
conflict context explored initial program theory in the Waves for Change (W4C) intervention
in neighboring Liberia [
11
]. This study highlighted the creation of a safe space, positive
social support, effective transfer of coping skills, and respite from negative emotions while
in the water, as integral to the intervention achieving its associated outcomes. These
elements of the intervention align with previously mentioned priority areas for youth
mental health in Sierra Leone [
6
]. The findings also triangulate with studies exploring surf
therapy for youth mental health in different contexts [
12
], especially around the importance
of a safe space, social support, and respite. The initial program theory expounded within
the research carried out in Liberia provided the theoretical framework for the piloting
of surf therapy in Sierra Leone. The aim of this study was to provide a mixed methods
evaluation of the associated impact of a range of surf therapy programs across Sierra Leone.
2. Methods
2.1. Surf Therapy in Sierra Leone; The Wave Alliance
This study is based on evaluation reports produced by 5 separate youth-focused and
community development organizations who collaborated to deliver surf therapy pilot
projects near to Freetown, Sierra Leone. The 5 organizations involved were the Moseray
Fadika Trust (Site 1), Young Leaders Sierra Leone (Site 2), United Sierra Leone (Site 3), the
Pipul Pikin Foundation (Site 4), and Job Opportunities for Youths (Site 5). The organizations
made these evaluations publicly available online, and links can be found in the Appendix
A. All of the organizations already provide youth support around education, employability,
and other contextual challenges. The organizations were brought together by the Messeh
Leone Trust (MLT) in 2019 to collaborate and bring surf therapy to Sierra Leone for the
first time. MLT also provided technical, financial, and programmatic support to partners
on the ground in Sierra Leone. This support included helping with setup, securing safe
spaces/sites, delivery of material support, and monitoring of pilot projects. MLT also
helps coordinate evaluation support from third parties to enable the objective, impartial
evaluation of projects. The initial step was an approach by the organizations to the Wave
Alliance (https://www.waves-for-change.org/the-wave-alliance/ (accessed on 5 June
2021)), an incubator program that offers training and ongoing support to start-up surf
therapy organizations within Low-to-Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). The training
is centered on mental health theory, program design and implementation, staff hiring
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 6267 3 of 11
and training, fundraising, and evaluation. The Wave Alliance framework is based on
the Waves for Change model of surf therapy and includes recent research carried out
into the intervention’s program theory [
11
]. While based on this model, the training is
not prescriptive and is designed to provide trainees the flexibility to best address the
challenges of their own context, encouraging the generation of new program content. Upon
completion of a 2-week training program in Cape Town, the organizations from Sierra
Leone returned and implemented small surf therapy pilots, running from November 2019
to March 2020. Sessions commenced in January 2020 and ran for 10–12 weeks (depending
on the site), with participants attending surf therapy once a week for two hours. Sessions
consisted of an initial meeting, with a safe space held so all participants could ‘check in’
with how they were feeling. This was followed by a warm-up game and the learning
activity for the day. Activities were based around surfing, but were designed to support
emotional regulation, goal setting, mindfulness, positive socializing, and respite [
11
]. The
session finished with time allocated to unstructured but supervised surfing/swimming,
followed by a debrief. It is important to note that these learning activities, the safe space,
caring coaches, and positive socializing are identified as integral and integrated within
surf therapy. The surfing component is viewed as a vehicle rather than the focus of the
intervention. In the locations selected, surfing was largely a novel sport. The limited
surfing that was present was largely due to tourism and was inaccessible for the majority
of local communities.
2.2. Sample Characteristics
Participants were recruited primarily through local schools or via local community
organizations. There was no screening process at this initial pilot stage, and the primary
criterion for involvement was referral partners believing individuals would benefit. Each
site worked with a different number of participants based on capacity. There was a
broad spread of age ranges within the sample (7–22), with an average age of 12.9 years.
Attendance was captured using the Teampact app (https://teampact.co/ (accessed on
5 June 2021)), which uses facial recognition and session timers to promote transparency
around intervention delivery. Table 1offers a breakdown of demographics within the surf
therapy pilots, including pooled national averages and attendance figures. Site 5 data is
not presented due to data collection issues, which are addressed below, but Site 5 had
comparable demographics to other sites (n= 18, average age 13.7, age range 8–17, 9 male
and 9 female).
Table 1. Sample demographics.
Site Number Organization nAverage Age Age Range Average Attendance Male Female
na
Pooled
National
Data
58 12.9 7–22 57.20% 35 23
1Moseray
Fadika Trust 14 13.3 9–20 89.30% 2 10
2
Young
Leaders
Sierra Leone
12 15.1 11–18 59.50% 12 0
3United Sierra
Leone 12 12.3 7–16 58.30% 11 3
4Pipul Pikin
Foundation 20 11.7 8–22 37.20% 10 10
2.3. Mixed Methods Evaluation: Phase 1—Quantitative Analysis
To best pragmatically satisfy the aim of this study, an uncontrolled mixed methods
approach was utilized in exploring surf therapy pilot evaluations within Sierra Leone.
Phase 1 of the analysis involved statistical analysis of pre/post data to evaluate associated
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 6267 4 of 11
program impacts. To do this, the anonymized pre and post data associated with the pilot
projects were made accessible to the research team. The evaluations utilized the Stirling
Child Well-Being Scale (SCWS) to measure participant well-being before and after the
course. This is a positively worded well-being measure developed by Stirling University in
2010 and has been demonstrated as both psychometrically reliable and valid for children
aged 8 and above [
13
]. The SCWS involves a 12 item positively worded well-being scale,
divided into Positive Emotional State and Positive Outlook sub-components. The scale
consists of a 5-point Likert format, with totals ranging from 12–60. Higher scores indicate
higher well-being. The scale also includes 3 social desirability items to control for response
set or socially desirable responses. Such data can be subsequently excluded from analysis.
The anonymous dataset was cleaned to remove any unpaired data, such as pre-tests
without corresponding post-tests (6 data items removed). Any scores that fulfilled social
desirability criteria on the SCWS were also removed (6 data sets removed). One site (Site 5)
did not manage to collect the pre/post data appropriately, and its data was removed.
Confusion arose over the anonymous data labelling implemented to protect participant
confidentiality. Mislabeling meant it was impossible to track individual attendance and to
match pre and post test data. While this was disappointing for this evaluation, it was a
valuable learning experience for future data collection.
Given the small sample sizes associated with individual sites, parametric analysis was
deemed inappropriate. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were carried out to test for significance
of associated impact on well-being. Wilcoxon signed rank tests also allow for exploration of
effect size (r = Z/
√
n), to best provide statistical representation of associated pilot outcomes.
2.4. Mixed Methods Evaluation: Phase 2—Qualitative Analysis
Phase 2 of the analysis consisted of a synthesis of the published surf therapy eval-
uations. The primary aim of this synthesis was to supplement the statistical analysis by
contextualizing surf therapy in Sierra Leone, while also highlighting the pragmatic chal-
lenges that may have had an impact on intervention delivery. Secondary aims included
reinforcing associated impact claims through triangulation and highlighting any reported
plausible mechanisms for comparison to the wider literature. Original data collection
consisted of open-ended qualitative questionnaires provided to all participants and their
parents upon culmination of intervention delivery. This questionnaire had a high response
rate (Site 1 n = 12; Site 2 n = 18; Site 3 n = 10; Site 4 n = 12; Site 5 n = 16). An opportunity for
open-ended reporting of intervention perceptions was also provided to other community
stakeholders, such as local teachers, community leaders, local government officials, police,
and healthcare workers. Trends within this original data were identified and reported
within the evaluation reports. The evaluations also included subjective project coordinator
reports, which captured challenges in delivery and offered interpretations that may not
otherwise have been included in evaluations. A combined thematic analysis of the data
within the evaluations was conducted to support the study’s aims. These different elements
of the evaluations were summarized and tabulated in a descriptive manner in line with the
aims of the synthesis.
2.5. Mixed Methods Evaluation: Phase 3—Comparative Analysis
Phase 3 of the analysis involved comparing and triangulating findings from Phase
1 and 2 to explore contextualized trends or patterns that would not have been possible if
merely considering each phase individually [
14
]. Further interpretive analysis of findings
from both phases, alongside wider literature from within the paradigm, is included within
the discussion section to address the study aims [15].
3. Results
3.1. Phase 1—Statistical Analysis of Well-Being Data
Initial statistical analysis consisted of Wilcoxon signed rank tests carried out on the
data associated within individual sites. Three of the sites (1,2,3) were associated with
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 6267 5 of 11
statistically significant large positive effects on participant well-being, as summarized
in Table 2. Site 4 differed from these other sites and was associated with a statistically
non-significant small negative effect on participant well-being (Z=
−
0.88, p< 0.380; r=
−
0.22). For ease of comparison, associated impact on participant well-being by site is
visualized in Figure 1. Data was not pooled for national analysis, given the significant
variation between sites.
Table 2. Breakdown of changes to well-being in Sierra Leone surf therapy.
Site ZAsymp. Sig (p) Effect Size (r)
1−2.415 0.016 0.65
2−2.944 0.003 0.84
3−2.395 0.017 0.69
4−0.877 0.380 −0.22
Figure 1. Mean change in participant well-being by site.
3.2. Phase 2—Evaluation Synthesis
The evaluation synthesis consisted of summarizing and tabulating key qualitative
components of evaluation reports collected from a range of stakeholders, including partici-
pants, parents, teachers, healthcare workers, and project coordinators. Summaries were
structured in line with synthesis aims: Reported Qualitative Impact, Plausible Mecha-
nisms Reported, and Challenges Reported (shown in Table 3). These identified elements
are largely based on individual quotes, and thus definitive conclusions cannot be drawn.
Alongside the changes to well-being described by quantitative measures, different types
of impact were reported within qualitative data, including improvements to socializing
(Sites 1, 3, and, 5) as well as improved mindset and feeling calmer (Sites 1 and 4). Also
reported were increased positive behaviors (Site 2) and reductions in negative behaviors
(Sites 3 and 5). Another notable trend was the reported impact on academic elements of
participants lives, with improvements in attendance (Site 2), effort (Site 4), and perfor-
mance (Site 3) in school all highlighted by a range of intervention stakeholders, including
school teachers.
In relation to plausible mechanisms, a range of program elements emerged across
intervention sites, including peer and social support (Sites 1, 2, 3, and, 5), respite (Sites 1 and
5), provision of a safe space (Sites 3 and 4), learned coping skills (Sites 3 and 4), alternatives
to negative activities (Site 1), and increased physical activity (Site 5). Given the limited
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 6267 6 of 11
amount of qualitative data and lack of targeted research exploring these plausible mecha-
nisms, findings may not be generalizable, but their presence adds strength to intervention
impact claims [16].
One of the most important elements the evaluation synthesis considered was the re-
ported challenges to intervention delivery. There were several themes that emerged across
multiple sites, including perceptions of water safety, the need for a feeding component,
and the need for transportation. The evaluations listed how these challenges were over-
come, largely through sourcing community partnerships, local funding for food/transport
provision, and building trust within the community around water safety. One of the sites
(Site 4) had a challenging pilot around consistency, including changes to lead coaches and
change of location, which may have contributed to or compounded low attendance. This
combination of factors may have severely inhibited the associated impact of the program
at the pilot stage.
Table 3. Summary of qualitative reporting within surf therapy evaluations.
Intervention Site Reported Qualitative Impact Plausible Mechanisms Reported Challenges Reported
1Feeling calmer, Improved
socializing
New positive relationships, Respite
from stress, Alternative to negative
activities
Perceptions around water
safety, Need for food within
program, Lack of disability
access, Transport to program
2
Improved academic
attendance, Behavioral
improvements
Peer support from other surfers,
Positive social relationships
Perceptions around water
safety, Need for food within
program, Lack of female
participation, Transport to
program
3
Improved socializing,
Reduction in bad behaviors,
Academic performance
Peer support from coaches, Safe
space, Coping skills
Perceptions around water
safety, Need for food within
program, Accessibility to
younger (<8) participants
4Improved mindset, Improved
academic effort Coping skills, Safe Space
Consistency of delivery, Low
attendance, Change of
location, Change of lead
coaches, Perceptions around
water safety, Need for food
within program
5Improved socializing,
Reduction in bad behaviors
Respite, Peer support from coaches,
Increased physical activity
Evaluation confusion,
Perceptions around
program aims
3.3. Phase 3—Comparative Analysis
When interpreted in totality, the different phases of analysis offer contextual insight as
to the associated impact of surf therapy pilots within Sierra Leone. Three of the sites were
associated with significant large positive effects on participant well-being. This associated
impact aligned with positive qualitative data that outlined associated positive well-being
indicators such as improved socializing, improved behavior, and improved emotional
regulation. The evaluation synthesis also highlighted the individual challenges reported at
Site 4, which provide context and plausible rational (largely related to low attendance) for
why this site was not associated with the same large positive effects as other sites.
4. Discussion and Implications
Overall, in this uncontrolled study, three out of four surf therapy sites analyzed were
associated with significant large positive effects on participant well-being. These are en-
couraging initial findings for the piloting of surf therapy in Sierra Leone and support
its continued delivery alongside further research. More rigorous research utilizing con-
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 6267 7 of 11
trol groups, blinding, and if possible randomization protocols, are required before any
effectiveness claims can be made.
When data were explored by site, the differences of associated impacts observed along-
side other intervention data provide valuable insight. Three sites (1,2,3) had comparable
significant large positive effects associated with participant wellbeing. From the data col-
lected, the noticeable difference between these sites and Site 4, which had a non-significant
associated impact, was attendance figures. Site 4
0
s attendance was considerably lower
than other sites, which suggests a plausible correlation between attendance and associated
impact on well-being. Such a correlation may indicate a minimum threshold of exposure to
surf therapy that is required before a positive impact can occur. Such a finding aligns with
wider research highlighting a dose-response relationship between physical activity and
positive mental health outcomes [
17
]. Other plausible mechanisms highlighted within the
evaluation synthesis included the development of social and coping skills, which would
take time to transfer and may account for the correlation between attendance and positive
impact on well-being. Previous research has highlighted how dosage has an important
amplifying effect on activity-based youth development and that further research is required
to explore if there are optimal dosages for different kinds of programs [
18
]. The findings
from this initial exploration of surf therapy in Sierra Leone suggest prolonged engagement
was key to a positive impact on well-being and should be an important consideration in
intervention design. Research to understand the optimal length of program, frequency of
delivery, and adherence levels would be beneficial. Further exploration of optimal dosage
or possible dose-response relationships within this intervention would be of benefit to both
the surf therapy and SfD paradigms, especially given the complete lack of such research
within LMICs or post-conflict settings.
The evaluation synthesis also allowed for contextual exploration of other challenges
experienced by the interventions at the pilot phase. One site (Site 4) experienced service
delivery issues linked to a required change of location and the absence of a lead coach
due to a family illness. These challenges, alongside the low attendance, appear to account
for the main differences between this site and the other intervention locations. Given the
intervention’s theoretical framework includes the premise of a consistently delivered safe
space [
11
], it is perhaps unsurprising that these inconsistencies had the impact they did.
Mitigation strategies around similar challenges to consistency should be a priority for all
of the intervention sites in the future.
Two further challenges were highlighted by all intervention sites: the need for a
feeding component to service delivery and the challenges posed by community beliefs
and preconceptions around water safety. All sites reported participants feeling hungry at
the end of sessions, which is unsurprising as even small amounts of the kind of paddling
associated with surfing have been shown to have significant energy costs [
19
]. Food security
was a reported challenge for some participants and their families. Without including a
feeding component, the interventions may have created an additional burden on local
communities, which would undermine goodwill and the perceived value of surf therapy.
All sites managed to find resources to add feeding components into programming prior to
completion of the pilot phase, and this provides an important pragmatic learning for other
interventions that include similar levels of energy expenditure.
The other challenge faced by all sites were perceptions/beliefs around water safety.
Drowning is a significant health burden across Africa, with children and adolescents
being some of the groups at highest risk [
20
]. The sites overcame these perceptions by
building trust and helping to improve understanding around water safety for the whole
community rather than just the participants. This included incorporating individuals with
aquatic expertise from the local communities into the service delivery, based on recognizing
the value of local knowledge and community collaboration [
21
]. Such individuals came
from free-diving or fishing backgrounds and had rescue capability, if not formal rescue
qualifications. A perception that further contributed to intervention hesitancy was the
notion that surfing could only occur in open or deep water. Practitioners demonstrated
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 6267 8 of 11
to the community that all surf therapy activities happen in standing depth of participants
and that building water confidence and swimming skills were included within activity
planning. This challenge and the integrated community-based method of overcoming it
provide valuable pragmatic learnings for similar intervention designs.
All but one of the sites reported negative changes within well-being to some partic-
ipants; it is important to understand how this related to the surf therapy interventions,
as not doing harm should be a highest priority. Individual negative scores should not be
generalized from; the most negative rankings, and therefore scores, were identified within
Site 4, which was also observed to have had the lowest attendance figures. This suggests
that negative changes to well-being may be related to factors outside of the intervention. As
previously discussed, the negative impact of conflict on youth mental health as experienced
in Sierra Leone is intergenerational [
2
] and was further compounded by the 2014–2016
Ebola pandemic [
5
]. Young people in Sierra Leone still face a wide range of challenges
to their mental health in day-to-day life, and these may account for the negative changes
reported, especially given their correlation to low attendance.
Plausible mechanisms identified within the evaluation synthesis add strength to claims
of the positive impact of surf therapy on participant well-being [
16
]. Identified mechanisms,
including the provision of a safe space, respite, and peer support, align with prior research,
which heavily informed the intervention design [
11
], alongside other research into surf
therapy for youth [
10
,
12
]. The evidence of participant social and coping skills being
recognized by other community stakeholders alludes to the successful implementation
of a specific skill transfer model [
22
]. It should be noted that the intervention exists as
a complex intervention, with multiple theoretical mediators [
11
], and this study does
not explore which mediators are most important to achieving outcomes. Future research
exploring the mediating effect of different components (e.g., coach characteristics, safe
space, social components, coping skills curriculum) within the intervention would be
valuable. The triangulation of previously identified mechanisms for youth well-being
through surf therapy with intervention stakeholder qualitative data lends further support
to the associated positive impact of surf therapy in Sierra Leone.
5. Limitations
The most significant limitation of this exploration of surf therapy in Sierra Leone is the
lack of any control group to compare intervention groups against. This limits discussion to
perceived associated impact and does not allow for interpretation as to the effectiveness
of the interventions. While this represents a substantial challenge to the robustness of the
findings, the importance of the process that led to them should not be understated. As part
of this project the intervention practitioners took ownership over the evaluation process,
from data collection through to evaluation write-up. At the evaluation design phase,
intervention leadership was offered support from academic partners, who also supported
the more in-depth statistical analysis seen within this review. This process supported the
recognized interests and wishes of SfD practitioners to better understand and be able to
conduct their own evaluations [
21
]. The aim of this process was also recognizing and
addressing concerns around neocolonialist approaches to research within the SfD field
by prioritizing the development of individual and organizational evaluation capacity as
highly as any other evaluation outcome [21].
Future work can build upon this even further with continued capacity building and
locally led research. This work carried out by the surf therapy practitioners deserves to be
recognized and shared, especially the honest reporting of challenges faced and, at times,
the non-significant impact. This process also provides the platform for future, locally
owned, more rigorous research that may have otherwise not been possible. Intervention
coordinators are exploring the potential of a randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of surf
therapy in the future, which would allow for an exploration of intervention effectiveness
that was impossible in this current work. While the challenges of conducting an RCT
within a surf therapy intervention are considerable, especially around the difficulties of
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 6267 9 of 11
blinding different arms, a locally led waitlist protocol would be a desirable piece of research
for the surf therapy, SfD, and blue space paradigms [23].
The SCWS is a validated and recognized tool for measuring child and youth well-
being [
13
]. Despite its successful use in multiple studies, its genesis within a Western
context (Scotland) should be recognized. The challenges of the use of and the predom-
inance of Western mental health tools in different contexts have been acknowledged by
researchers [
24
]. The process of developing and validating locally informed well-being
and mental health measurements has been previously reported [
25
], and a similar process
to generate a Sierra Leone–specific measurement would be of significant benefit to future
research in the region. Exploring the physiological measurements associated with well-
being, such as heart rate variability or cortisol, may also offer different ways of exploring
or further triangulating the impact of surf therapy in Sierra Leone.
6. Conclusions
This uncontrolled mixed methods study highlights promising initial findings related
to the positive associated impact of surf therapy for youth well-being in Sierra Leone across
multiple sites and supports continued delivery. The findings highlight the importance
of prolonged participant engagement with surf therapy alongside the value of working
together with local communities in overcoming challenges in intervention delivery. Lessons
learned in the piloting of surf therapy in Sierra Leone offer pragmatic insight into inter-
vention delivery while providing the foundations and initial steps for locally owned more
rigorous research in the future.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization: J.M. and R.M. Data collection and curation:
S.K. (Sallu Kamuskay), I.M., F.T., J.C., M.M., M.M.S., O.M.-L., M.B., S.K.(Sullayman Keita) and
O.J. Formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing—original draft: J.M. Writing—review and
editing: J.M., R.M., B.F., M.L. and S.K. (Sallu Kamuskay). Project administration: J.M. All authors
have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding:
The Wave Alliance training program and an initial distribution of surfboards to pilots
was funded by The Swedish Postcode Lottery (https://postkodstiftelsen.se/ (accessed on 5 June
2021)) and Comic Relief (https://www.comicrelief.com/ (accessed on 5 June 2021)). The funding,
labor, and resources for the delivery, monitoring, and evaluation of surf therapy pilots was provided
by the Messeh Leone Trust and partner organizations (Moseray Fadika Trust Foundation, Young
Leaders Sierra Leone, United Sierra Leone, the Pipul Pikin Foundation, and Job Opportunities for
Youths—JOY). The Messeh Leone Trust and partner organizations did not receive any funding from
the Swedish Postcode Lottery or Comic Relief, nor vice versa, for this research.
Institutional Review Board Statement:
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the
Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of
Edinburgh Napier University School of Applied Sciences (Ref. Code: 2751928).
Informed Consent Statement:
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement:
The data presented in this study are available on request from the
corresponding author: james.marshall@napier.ac.uk.
Acknowledgments:
The lead author would like to thank the surf therapy pilot leadership for their
commitment to sharing and publishing the results from their pilots openly, especially around elements
that did not go according to plan. Many of the most important learnings from this study came from
this. A special acknowledgement should also go to the Messeh Leone Trust for their vision and wish
to test the potential of surf therapy in Sierra Leone.
Conflicts of Interest: There are no conflict of interest to declare.
Appendix A Links to Surf Therapy Pilot Evaluations
Moseray Fadika Trust Foundation: https://www.waves-for-change.org/wp-content/
uploads/2020/08/MFT-Evaluation-Report-Final.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2021).
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 6267 10 of 11
Young Leaders Sierra Leone: https://www.waves-for-change.org/wp-content/uploads/
2020/07/Young-Leaders-Sierra-Leone-Surf-Therapy-Report.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2021).
United Sierra Leone: https://www.waves-for-change.org/wp-content/uploads/2020
/07/United-Sierra-Leone-Sierra-Leone-Surf-Therapy-Report.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2021).
Pipul Pikin Foundation: https://www.waves-for-change.org/wp-content/uploads/
2020/07/Pipul-Pikin-Sierra-Leone-Surf-Therapy-Report.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2021).
Job Opportunities for Youth Sierra Leone (JOY): https://www.waves-for-change.org/
wp-content/uploads/2020/08/JOY-SIERRA-LEONE-SURF-THERAPY-REPORT.pdf (ac-
cessed on 5 June 2021).
References
1.
Attanayake, V.; McKay, R.; Joffres, M.; Singh, S.; Burkle, F., Jr.; Mills, E. Prevalence of mental disorders among children exposed to
war: A systematic review of 7920 children. Med. Confl. Surviv. 2009,25, 4–19. [CrossRef]
2.
Betancourt, T.S.; McBain, R.K.; Newnham, E.A.; Brennan, R.T. The intergenerational impact of war: Longitudinal relationships
between caregiver and child mental health in postconflict Sierra Leone. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry
2015
,56, 1101–1107. [CrossRef]
3.
Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers (CSUCS). Global Report 2008. 2008. Available online: https://reliefweb.int/sites/
reliefweb.int/files/resources/67012B7F8EB991888525744F0069863A-Child%20Soldiers%20Global%20Report%202008.pdf
(accessed on 2 February 2021).
4.
World Health Organization. Ebola Situation Report—20 January 2016. 2016. Available online: https://apps.who.int/ebola/
current-situation/ebola-situation-report-20-january-2016 (accessed on 5 February 2021).
5.
Bah, A.J.; James, P.B.; Bah, N.; Sesay, A.B.; Sevalie, S.; Kanu, J.S. Prevalence of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress
disorder among Ebola survivors in northern Sierra Leone: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health
2020
,20, 1391. [CrossRef]
6.
Betancourt, T.S.; Newnham, E.A.; Hann, K.; McBain, R.K.; Akinsulure-Smith, A.M.; Weisz, J.; Lilienthal, G.M.; Hansen, N.
Addressing the Consequences of Violence and Adversity: The Development of a Group Mental Health Intervention for War-
Affected Youth in Sierra Leone. 2014. Available online: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1420
&context=cc_pubs (accessed on 5 February 2021).
7.
Whitley, M.A.; Massey, W.V.; Camiré, M.; Blom, L.C.; Chawansky, M.; Forde, S.; Boutet, M.; Borbee, A.; Darnell, S.C. A systematic
review of sport for development interventions across six global cities. Sport Manag. Rev. 2019,22, 181–193. [CrossRef]
8.
Whitley, M.A.; Massey, W.V.; Camiré, M.; Boutet, M.; Borbee, A. Sport-based youth development interventions in the United
States: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2019,19, 89. [CrossRef]
9.
Hamilton, A.; Foster, C.; Richards, J. A systematic review of the mental health impacts of sport and physical activity programmes
for adolescents in post-conflict settings. J. Sport Dev. 2016,4, 44–59.
10.
Benninger, E.; Curtis, C.; Sarkisian, G.V.; Rogers, C.M.; Bender, K.; Comer, M. Surf therapy: A scoping review of the qualitative
and quantitative research evidence. Glob. J. Community Psychol. Pract. 2020,11, 1–26.
11.
Marshall, J.; Ferrier, B.; Ward, P.B.; Martindale, R. I feel happy when I surf because it takes stress from my mind: An Initial
Exploration of Program Theory within Waves for Change Surf Therapy in Post-Conflict Liberia. J. Sport Dev. 2020,9, 1–17.
12.
Marshall, J.; Kelly, P.; Niven, A. When I Go There, I Feel Like I Can Be Myself. Exploring Programme Theory within the Wave
Project Surf Therapy Intervention. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019,16, 2159. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13.
Liddle, I.; Carter, G.F. Emotional and psychological well-being in children: The development and validation of the Stirling
Children’s Well-being Scale. Educ. Psychol. Pract. 2015,31, 174–185. [CrossRef]
14. Begley, C.M. Using triangulation in nursing research. J. Adv. Nurs. 1996,24, 122–128. [CrossRef]
15.
Evans, D. Systematic reviews of interpretive research: Interpretive data synthesis of processed data. Aust. J. Adv. Nurs.
2002
,20,
22–26. [PubMed]
16. Hill, A.B. The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? Proc. R. Soc. Med. 1965,58, 295–300. [CrossRef]
17.
Richards, J.; Jiang, X.; Kelly, P.; Chau, J.; Bauman, A.; Ding, D. Don’t worry, be happy: Cross-sectional associations between
physical activity and happiness in 15 European countries. BMC Public Health 2015,15, 53. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Hansen, D.M.; Larson, R.W. Amplifiers of developmental and negative experiences in organized activities: Dosage, motivation,
lead roles, and adult-youth ratios. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 2007,28, 360–374. [CrossRef]
19.
Borgonovo-Santos, M.; Zacca, R.; Fernandes, R.J.; Vilas-Boas, J.P. The impact of a single surfing paddling cycle on fatigue and
energy cost. Sci. Rep. 2021,11, 4566. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20.
Miller, L.; Alele, F.O.; Emeto, T.I.; Franklin, R.C. Epidemiology, risk factors and measures for preventing drowning in Africa: A
systematic review. Medicina 2019,55, 637. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21.
Whitley, M.A.; Farrell, K.; Wolff, E.A.; Hillyer, S.J. Sport for development and peace: Surveying actors in the field. J. Sport Dev.
2019,7, 1–15.
22.
Pierce, S.; Gould, D.; Camiré, M. Definition and model of life skills transfer. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol.
2017
,10, 186–211.
[CrossRef]
23.
Britton, E.; Kindermann, G.; Domegan, C.; Carlin, C. Blue care: A systematic review of blue space interventions for health and
wellbeing. Health Promot. Int. 2020,35, 50–69. [CrossRef]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021,18, 6267 11 of 11
24.
Hollifield, M.; Warner, T.D.; Lian, N.; Krakow, B.; Jenkins, J.H.; Kesler, J.; Stevenson, J.; Westermeyer, J. Measuring trauma and
health status in refugees: A critical review. JAMA 2002,288, 611–621. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25.
Betancourt, T.S.; Bass, J.; Borisova, I.; Neugebauer, R.; Speelman, L.; Onyango, G.; Bolton, P. Assessing local instrument reliability
and validity: A field-based example from northern Uganda. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol.
2009
,44, 685–692. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
