PresentationPDF Available

Stable Schools in Community Supported Agriculture Building Resilience with a Co-Creative Approach from Transdisciplinary Practice and Collaborative Consultation

Authors:
Stable Schools in Community Supported Agriculture
Building Resilience with a Co-Creative Approach from Transdisciplinary Practice and Collaborative Consultation
Marius Rommel, Alina Reinartz, Irene Antoni-Komar
RECOMS Spaces of Possibility Confex
June 7th - 11th, 2021
Session 5 – “Let’s grow together!”
Community food growing & alternative food practices
www.nascent-transformativ.de/en
www.solidarischer-landwirtschaft.de
Agenda
2
1. CSA as our field of activity
What is CSA
Why do we need intervention & data?
2. Stable School - a method of
Participatory Transdisciplinarity
Transdisciplinarity Approach
Origin
Characteristics
Process
Agenda
3
1. CSA as our field of activity
What is CSA
Why do we need intervention & data?
2. Stable School - a method of
Participatory Transdisciplinarity
Transdisciplinarity Approach
Origin
Characteristics
Process
1. Aim and Research design
Research Question
In how far is the stable-school-method able to empower CSAs in a co-creative and collaborative way to 1.
identify problems of economic and social stability, 2. jointly develop their own solution strategies in order to
meet the transformative aspirations of their enterprise and to promote organizational stability?
This study aims at developing a method
(1) as an empirical tool to collect data about organizational stability of CSAs (science perspective)
(2) as a tool, that directly supports CSAs in their ambition to solve problems and stabilize their organizations
(practitioners perspective)
4
Multiple crisis within the food industry |
Starting point of our research
As a multiple crisis experience, the Covid-19 pandemic shows impact on food systems worldwide, especially in
terms of their resilience (Féodoroff et al., 2021).
The existing discourse about necessary changes towards healthy, ecological and, above all, decentralized production
and distribution of food has now intensified (Lamine, 2015; Worstell, 2020).
The nascent research project aims at elaborating the possibilities and limitations of the transformation of the
current systematically unsustainable food industry towards a sustainable Local Food System currently focusing on
Community Supported Agriculture (CSA).
The current crisis has exposed, ever more, the cracks in our food and agricultural systems;
we can use this as an opportunity to transform these.(Gemmill-Herren, 2020, p. 614)
https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2019/07/16/Food-system-overhaul-needed-to-avoid-catastrophic-climate-breakdown
CSA as a multi-functional enterprise
6
Taking on responsibility for agriculture
Sharing the harvest
CSA as a multi-functional enterprise
We focus on the movement of Alternative Food Networks (AFN) in which one prominent model suitable is that
of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) (Sage, Kropp, & Antoni-Komar, 2020; Barbera & Dagnes, 2016).
CSA has dynamically developed since the 1960s in the global North, first in Japan (Kondoh, 2015) and the USA,
from 1988 with the first pioneer farms ("Buschberghof") in Germany. The world's largest CSA-organization is the
South Korean cooperative Hansalim, currently supplying two million people with over 2,300 farms (Asmuth, 2019).
CSA is a community-based supply system that provides an alternative to the grow-or-die dilemma in
decentralized, small-scale, and demand-driven value-added arrangements. CSA firstly enables the economic
viability of micro-agricultural enterprises and secondly sets an upper limit to farm size as a result of spatially and
socially direct relationships (Paech, Rommel, & Sperling, 2019).
Producers and consumers collaborate in a direct partnership and shortest distance (community-based
consumer-producer interactions (CPI) (Opitz et al., 2019) without a market, intermediaries, marketing, logistics,
industrial processing, etc. that shapes the basis for a resilient local food supply.
(Antoni-Komar, Kropp, Paech, & Pfriem, 2019; Paech, Rommel, Antoni-Komar, & Posse, 2020; Bloemmen, Bobulescu, Le, &
Vitari, 2015; Boddenberg, Gunkel, Schmitz, Vaessen, & Blättel-Mink, 2017; Hayden & Buck, 2012; Wellner & Theuvsen, 2017)
7
CSA as a multi-functional enterprise
8
CSA is more than food production.
CSA is a multi-functional organization that offers numerous benefits. It is an economic model beyond market
mechanism comprising as a precondition the community of joint financing and co-production. Economically
spoken the supply of goods and services is a comprehensive joint production, as it satisfies needs beyond the
mere provision of food.
CSA is a provider and recipient of both ecosystem and cultural services (community, solidarity and agroecology).
It depends upon and transforms natural resources as well as social capital into food, culture and ecological
services.
CSA is integrating economy and social cohesion for the transformation of the food system.
Why do we need intervention & data
1. CSAs face a trilemma of organizational stability.
2. Farms can benefit from the labor of their
members, namely as prosumers or co-
producers (Paech, Sperling, & Rommel, 2020). The
more people experience their active
participation in CSA as being meaningful, the
more resilient the companies become in terms
of available labor.
3. But, this also entails the risk of over-motivation
and overstraining, long-winded decision-making
or uncertain responsibilities. There is a risk of
intra-organizational de-stabilization or even the
inability to operate (Paech et al., 2019).
4. Challenge on generating an adequate income
for the core team (Galt, Bradley, Christensen, van
Soelen Kim, & Lobo, 2016).
Agenda
10
1. CSA as our field of activity
What is CSA
Why do we need intervention & data?
2. Stable School - a method of
Participatory Transdisciplinarity
Transdisciplinarity Approach
Origin
Characteristics
Process
What does Transdisciplinarity mean to us?
What does Transdisciplinarity mean to us?
Perspective of a researcher
Participatory Transdisciplinarity (Mobjörk, 2010, S. 870)
“In participatory transdisciplinarity, on the other hand, societal actors are fully
included in the knowledge production process and their knowledge is equally valuable
to scientific knowledge”
Transformative Science (Schneidewind et al., 2018)
Action Research (Stringer & Ortiz Aragon, 2021)
What does Transdisciplinarity mean to us?
Perspective of a practitioner & the network
CSA is a transdisciplinary undertaking itself, because it brings togethers many realms
such as organic farming, legal forms and tax aspects, logistics, group process, decision
making and a new relationship between farmers and consumers.
Research about CSA has quite increased in the last few years. Though the community
has not benefited in equal measure, as bachelor thesis' or research abstracts didn’t
find their way back to the people who offered input due to length, language or the
lack of benefit of the content itself.
So the question is how the network and the people involved in CSA-projects can
benefit better from research and how can researchers can do more relevant work for
the "real world"?
We see the great potential of the Stable Schools as a new format for the CSA-
movement: Knowledge circulates between practitioners, Consultants and
Researchers and thus stays in the system.
The Stable-School-Method
ble-medienservice.de
By Crops for the Future - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0,
The Stable-School-Method
STABLE SCHOOL
Method for collecting
data about stability and resilience
+
transformative Instrument
supporting stabilization and resilience
ble-medienservice.de
The Stable-School-Method
ble-medienservice.de
This format originated in the global south as “farmer-field-schools” and was brought to Europe by researchers in
Denmark naming it stable school, referring to the stable for animals (van den Berg, Phillips, Dicke, & Fredrix,
2020)
The Thünen Institute then brought it over to Germany in the field of milk-farmers and animal welfare. For our
research on stabilizing CSAs we just reinterpreted the term now meaning stable in terms of resilient and socially
and economically viable, since not all CSA projects involve animals (Henriksen, Anneberg, Sørensen, & Møller,
2015; Ivemeyer et al., 2015; March, Brinkmann, & Winckler, 2014)
Stable School for CSA-farms/ groups picks up the idea of the "classical" stable school and combines it with the
GROW-Modell, a coaching tool for goal setting and problem solving developed by John Whitemore, which has
already been tried and tested in the CSA-consulting before (Growell 2013)
It aims to exchange experience and ideas on how to meet individual challenges and stabilize the project.
It is a great tool for collecting data about stability and resilience, so that researchers and consultants learn more
about the relevant aspects that help stabilizing CSAs.
As well as it is a transformative instrument itself as it is based on the experiences of practitioners itself and
empowers them to find their own solution.
The Stable-School-Method
17
Fixed Parameters
5 CSA projects
1 moderation
The Stable-School-Method
18
Fixed Parameters
5 CSA projects
1 moderation
There are different forms of Stable Schools for CSA-projects/farms.
The morphology shows the variety of manifestations of the charateristics.
The only two parameters that are set are the group size of five CSA-projects
and the role of moderation during the process.
We are currently designing different forms of Stable School, both digital and
real-live events.
We made good experience with the online format, which lowered the
inhibition threshold for practitioners to participate in terms of time and
traveling expenses.
Furthermore it makes it easier to bring together CSA-projects with similiar
issues and/ or structural similarities (e.g. legal form, size, product range).
How does the process work?
19
Fixed Parameters
5 CSA projects
1 moderation
How does the process work?
20
Preparation
Invitation
+ Profile of participating projects
+ Handout about the issues of economical stabilization
Timetable
4:00 4:10 Welcoming
4:10 4:15 Attunement to the topic
4:15 4:30 Input & Discussion
4:30 5:30 Collegial Consultation
5:30 5:35 Break
5:35 5:40 Brief Resume in small groups
5:40 5:50 Collection of Critical Success Factors
5:50 6:00 - Conclusion
How does the process work?
21
How does the process work?
22
GOAL
What is your personal story of success?
REALITY
What is your problem related to economical stability?
OPTIONS
Which measures are useful in your view?
WILL
Which measures do you want to try? What is your next step?
How do we collect data?
23
Documentation
Audio-Recording, Miro-Board,
Analysis
Transcription and qualitative data analysis via maxqda-software
Interpretation
We put in relation indicators about the stability (trilemma check) and observed characteristics of the
farms in order to derive successful stabilization-measures, structures and activites
Critical Reflection
24
What went well?
The Format helps collecting of solution strategies for organizational stabilization.
It offers the participants a safe space to talk about the project’s but also personal challenges.
This form of collegial consultation can complete the network’s advisory concept and set a starting point for
further individual consultation.
All parties benefit from the synergetic effects.
The participants are highly interested to find solution for their issues, so they are a very motivated “research
object”.
What did we learn?
The moderation needs to keep up a positive spirit and make sure that the participants communicate
appreciatively.
If the case gets too technical (legal forms, tax law), the group might not be able to offer solutions.
08.06.2021 25
Thank You
References
Further information:
Nascent-homepage + movie (http://www.nascent-transformativ.de/en)
Literature
Antoni-Komar, I., Kropp, C., Paech, N., & Pfriem, R. (Eds.) (2019). Transformative Unternehmen und die Wende in der Ernährungswirtschaft (1st
ed., Vol. 72). Marburg: Metropolis.
Antoni-Komar, I., & Lenz, C. (2021). Transformative communities in Germany: working towards a sustainable food supply through creative doing
and collaboration. In C. Kropp, I. Antoni-Komar, & C. Sage (Eds.), Food system transformations: Social movements, local economies, collaborative
networks (pp. 141156). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131304-11
Barbera, F., & Dagnes, J. (2016). Building Alternatives from the Bottom-up: The Case of Alternative Food Networks. Agriculture and Agricultural
Science Procedia, 8, 324331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.027
Bloemmen, M., Bobulescu, R., Le, N. T., & Vitari, C. (2015). Microeconomic degrowth: The case of Community Supported Agriculture. Ecological
Economics, 112, 110115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.013
Brehm, J. M., & Eisenhauer, B. W. (2008). Motivations for Participating in Community-Supported Agriculture and their Relationship with Community
Attachment und Social Capital. Southern Rural Sociology, 23(1).
Féodoroff, T., Parot, J., & Schneider, M. (2021). Enacting Resilience: the Response of Local Solidarity-based Partnerships for Agroecology to the Covid-
19 Crisis. Retrieved from Urgenci website: https://urgenci.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Urgenci-rapport-Enacting-ResilienceFINAL-FINAL.pdf
Galt, R. E., Bradley, K., Christensen, L., van Soelen Kim, J., & Lobo, R. (2016). Eroding the Community in Community Supported Agriculture (CSA):
Competition's Effects in Alternative Food Networks in California. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4), 491512. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12102
Gemmill-Herren, B. (2020). Closing the circle: An agroecological response to covid-19. Agriculture and Human Values, 613614.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10097-7
GORELL, R. (2013): Group coaching. A practical guide to optimising collective talent in any organization. Kogan Page Ltd, Philadelphia, PA.
HANSMANN, V. K., O. VOLLING und V. KRÖMKER (2020): Modified Tool for Organic Dairy Herds. In: Organic Farming 6 (1).
Hayden, J., & Buck, D. (2012). Doing community supported agriculture: Tactile space, affect and effects of membership. Geoforum, 43(2), 332341.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.08.003 26
References
Henriksen, B. I., Anneberg, I., Sørensen, J. T., & Møller, S. H. (2015). Farmers' perception of stable schools as a tool to improve management for the
benefit of mink welfare. Livestock Science, 181, 716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.09.019
Ivemeyer, S., Bell, N. J., Brinkmann, J., Cimer, K., Gratzer, E., Leeb, C., . . . Vaarst, M. (2015). Farmers taking responsibility for herd health
developmentstable schools in research and advisory activities as a tool for dairy health and welfare planning in Europe. Organic Agriculture, 5(2),
135141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0101-y
Kropp, C., Antoni-Komar, I., & Sage, C. (Eds.) (2021). Food system transformations: Social movements, local economies, collaborative networks.
London: Routledge.
Lamine, C. (2015). Sustainability and Resilience in Agrifood Systems: Reconnecting Agriculture, Food and the Environment. Sociologia Ruralis, 55(1),
4161. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12061
Mobjörk, M. (2010). Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures, 42(8), 866873.
Mert-Cakal, T., & Miele, M. (2020). 'workable utopias' for social change through inclusion and empowerment? Community supported agriculture
(CSA) in Wales as social innovation. Agriculture and Human Values, 120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10141-6
Opitz, I., Zoll, F., Zasada, I., Doernberg, A., Siebert, R., & Piorr, A. (2019). Consumer-producer interactions in community-supported agriculture and
their relevance for economic stability of the farm An empirical study using an Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 2232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.011
Paech, N., Rommel, M., Antoni-Komar, I., & Posse, D. (2020). Das Wirtschaftsprinzip der kleinen Einheiten: Resilienz durch gemeinschaftsgetragene
Versorgungsstrukturen am Beispiel Solidarischer Landwirtschaftsbetriebe. Haushalt in Bildung & Forschung, 9(4-2020), 4763.
https://doi.org/10.3224/hibifo.v9i4.04
Paech, N., Rommel, M., & Carsten Sperling, C. (2019). Transformatives Größenmanagement. Wie lassen sich transformative Wirtschaftsformen
wirtschaftlich und sozial stabilisieren? In I. Antoni-Komar, C. Kropp, N. Paech, & R. Pfriem (Eds.), Transformative Unternehmen und die Wende in
der Ernährungswirtschaft (1st ed., pp. 129158). Marburg: Metropolis.
Paech, N., Sperling, C., & Rommel, M. (2020). Cost effects of local food enterprises: supply chains, transaction costs and social diffusion. In C.
Kropp, I. Antoni-Komar, & C. Sage (Eds.), Food system transformations: Social movements, local economies, collaborative networks (pp. 119138).
London: Routledge.
27
References
Ravenscroft, N., Moore, N., Welch, E., & Hanney, R. (2013). Beyond agriculture: the counter-hegemony of community farming. Agriculture and
Human Values, 30(4), 629639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-013-9437-7
Rommel, M., Paech, N., & Sperling, C. (2019). Eine Ökonomie der Nähe. Horizontale Ausbreitung resilienter Versorgungsmuster. In I. Antoni-
Komar, C. Kropp, N. Paech, & R. Pfriem (Eds.), Transformative Unternehmen und die Wende in der Ernährungswirtschaft (1st ed., pp. 361397).
Marburg: Metropolis.
Sage, C., Kropp, C., & Antoni-Komar, I. (2020). Grassroots initiatives in food system transformation: the role of food movements in the second
‘Great Transformation’. In C. Kropp, I. Antoni-Komar, & C. Sage (Eds.), Food system transformations: Social movements, local economies,
collaborative networks (pp. 119). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131304-1
Schneidewind, U., Augenstein, K., Stelzer, F. & Wanner, M. (2018). Structure Matters: Real-World Laboratories as a New Type of Large-Scale Research
Infrastructure: A Framework Inspired by Giddens' Structuration Theory. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(1), 1217.
Stringer, E. T. & Ortiz Aragon, A. (2021). Action research (Fifth edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R. & Kinzig, A. P. (2004). Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-ecological Systems. Ecology and
Society, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205
VAARST, M., T. B. NISSEN, S. ØSTERGAARD, I. C. KLAAS, T. W. BENNEDSGAARD und J. CHRISTENSEN (2007): Danish stable schools forexperiential
common learning in groups of organic dairy farmers. In: Journal of dairy science 90 (5): 2543-2554.
Van den Berg, H., Phillips, S., Dicke, M., & Fredrix, M. (2020). Impacts of farmer field schools in the human, social, natural and financial domain: a
qualitative review. Food Security, 12(6), 14431459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01046-7
28
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Book
Full-text available
This book examines the role of local food movements, enterprises and networks in the transformation of the currently unsustainable global food system. It explores a series of innovations designed to re-integrate sustainable modes of food production and encourage food sovereignty. It provides detailed insights into a specialised network of social actors collaborating in novel ways and creating new economic arrangements across different geographical locales. In working to devise ‘local solutions to global problems’, the initiatives explored in the book represent a ‘second-generation’ food social movement which is less preoccupied with distinctive local qualities than with building socially just food systems aimed at delivering healthy nutrition worldwide. Drawing on fieldwork undertaken in sites across Europe, the USA and Brazil, the book provides a rich collection of case studies that offer a fresh perspective on the role of grassroots action in the transition to more sustainable food production systems. Addressing a substantive gap in the literature that falls between global analyses of the contemporary food system and highly localised case studies, the book will appeal to those teaching food studies and those conducting research on civic food initiatives or on environmental social movements more generally.
Article
Full-text available
Am Beispiel der Solidarischen Landwirtschaft (SoLawi) skizziert die Untersuchung ein dezentrales, kleinräumiges und bedarfsgerechtes Wirtschaftsprinzip der kleinen Einheiten. Eigenschaften einer gemeinschaftsgetragenen und maßvollen Ernährungsversorgung werden analysiert, um die Perspektive eines resilienten regionalen Wertschöpfungsraumes jenseits anonymer Fremdversorgung und komplexer Wertschöpfungsarchitekturen aufzuzeigen. Using the example of solidarity-based agriculture, the study outlines a decentralized, smallscale and demand-oriented economic principle of small units. Characteristics of a community-based and moderate food supply are analysed to show the perspective of a resilient regional value creation area beyond anonymous external supply and complex value creation architectures.
Chapter
Full-text available
The challenges faced by the contemporary food system across ecological, human health and ethical fields has given rise to an eclectic variety of local food initiatives that seek to demonstrate practical alternatives to business as usual. Such initiatives have moved beyond earlier efforts, often labelled alternative food networks, and may be regarded as a second-generation social movement capable of helping to restore greater resilience and social justice within a more sustainable food system. This introductory chapter outlines the basis of a possible second ‘Great Transformation’ in agri-food – following Polanyi’s original proposition regarding the triumph of the market economy and the widespread commodification of life. During the second half of the 20th century almost all aspects of food and agriculture were detached from their social, cultural and material contexts and this has led to a host of problematic dietary health and environmental outcomes. The emergence of a more experimental and ethical food economy at local and regional scales entangles diverse actors in heterogeneous and interdependent initiatives working to restore the cultural, ecological and ethical basis of a sustainable food system. The chapter outlines the transformative potential of grassroots initiatives and briefly describes the remaining chapters of the volume.
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter is about community building in sustainable food initiatives. As a key aspect of their visions, strategies and practices, transformative enterprises and initiatives, such as community-supported agriculture, urban gardening projects and food cooperatives, focusing on sustainable food production and consumption, have a strong interest in changing the anonymous role of the consumer into participatory involvement. This contribution underlines the importance of community building as a driving force in the transformation of the food system. To analyze the significance of community in local food enterprises, theoretical concepts such as the approach of post-traditional communities, the strategies-as-practice approach of strategic management and approaches of solidarity economics are used. Empirical data was collected (semi-structured interviews, participant observation, action research) and workshops conducted in collaboration with 27 practitioners from local food enterprises and initiatives in Germany. The interviews were subject to computer-aided qualitative text analysis while quantitative data was gathered from surveys of the members and customers of the enterprises. The findings point out how participation in transformative enterprises is based on new forms of creative doing and collaboration and which barriers and opportunities lay within them.
Chapter
Full-text available
The current food industry is not sustainable. The way food supply is organized in industrialized countries is based on the consistent overuse of limited resources. This focus on continuous increases in efficiency (since industrial-ization) ignores the unavoidable external effects of this mode of production. Producers are subject to competition that destroys smallholder structures according to the motto “grow or vanish”. Contrary to this trend, transforma-tive enterprises and initiatives such as tenants’ gardens, community- supported agriculture (CSA), food cooperatives and regional brands are developing beyond market economy constraints. These enterprises and initiatives aim to establish sustainable, regional and sovereign supply systems through partici-patory and ecological practices. However, this approach goes hand in hand with a relatively low degree of division of labor and specialization, resulting in a limited potential to exploit economies of scale. This may gradually be compensated for, first by including so- called “prosumers”, who reduce pro-duction costs by providing their own services, and second by increasing con-sumers’ willingness to pay for the enhanced product quality and sustainable production methods.Conversely, the coordination of voluntary work and participatory organ-izational structures is accompanied by additional cost categories. In the transdisciplinary collaboration with 27 practical and 11 transfer partners, an “organizational size trilemma” was identified as the central challenge of these transformative enterprises: on the one hand, they must achieve a min-imum economically viable size to operate efficiently. On the other hand, social stability requires that a maximum company size is not exceeded to limit the personal effort involved in coordinating relatively non- hierarchical processes. Striking a balance between these size limits should prevent the transformative character of the enterprise from being lost. This marks the third goal of the trilemma.The central results of this study are: (1) the elaboration of general man-agement principles for supply chain architectures that diverge fundamentally from traditional enterprises; and (2) the classification of different business models. Particular attention is paid to those factors that contribute to the long- term economic stabilization of these new enterprises and initiatives. In view of changes taking place within the food industry, recommendations for action have been developed for both the stabilization and diffusion of transformative enterprises. In the light of the size trilemma discussed above, the diffusion of transformative enterprises does not take place through the vertical growth of existing enterprises, but through the horizontal spread of newly emerging units.
Article
Full-text available
The focus of this article is community supported agriculture (CSA) as an alternative food movement and a bottom-up response to the problems of the dominant food systems. By utilizing social innovation approach that explores the relationship between causes for human needs and emergence of socially innovative food initiatives, the article examines how the CSA projects emerge and why, what is their innovative role as part of the social economy and what is their transformative potential. Based on qualitative data from four different models of CSA case studies in different regions of Wales, UK, and by using concepts from an alternative model for social innovation (ALMOLIN) as analytical tool, the article demonstrates that the Welsh CSA cases play distinctive roles as part of the social economy. They satisfy the needs for ecologically sound and ethically produced food, grown within communities of like-minded people and they empower individuals and communities at micro level, while at the same time experiment with how to be economically sustainable and resilient on a small scale. The paper argues that in order to become ‘workable utopias’, the CSA initiatives need to overcome the barriers that prevent them from replicating, participating in policies and decision-making at macro level, and scaling up.
Chapter
Full-text available
Der transformative Charakter so gestarteter unternehmerischer Initiativen ist nicht ein für allemal garantiert. Niko Paech, Marius Rommel und Carsten Sperling konstatieren ein Trilemma, über das der transformative Charakter mit Maßen betriebswirtschaftlicher und sozialer Stabilität verkoppelt ist. Für die betriebswirtschaftliche Stabilität braucht es eine Untergrenze, für die soziale Stabilität hingegen eine Obergrenze. Beides ist erforderlich, um transformative Unternehmen auf Dauer zu stellen, wofür eine Reihe konkreter Maßnahmen vorgeschlagen werden.
Chapter
Full-text available
Unter dem Leitbegriff einer Ökonomie der Nähe beschäftigen sich Marius Rommel, Niko Paech und Carsten Sperling mit der horizontalen Ausbreitung resilienter Versorgungsmuster. Vertikales Wachstum kann für transformative Unternehmen keine ihren Charakter sichernde Strategie darstellen. Gestützt auf Erkenntnisse der Diffusionsforschung charakterisieren sie die mögliche Rolle von Systemdienstleistern und entwickeln ein Konzept resilienter Wertschöpfungsräume.
Book
„Neue Chancen für eine nachhaltige Ernährungswirtschaft durch trans-formative Wirtschaftsformen“: im Forschungsprojekt nascent wurde an der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, der Universität Stuttgart und der anstiftung in München die Vielfalt transformativer Ernährungsunternehmen und Initiativen mit Förderung des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) untersucht. Dabei ging es zunächst um die Motive, Organisationsformen, Arbeitsbedingungen und Vernetzungsprozesse der Unternehmen und Initiativen. Diese Wirtschaftsformen (wie Mietäcker, Solidarische Landwirtschaften, Erzeuger-Verbraucher-Gemeinschaften, Regionalmarken) zielen darauf, nachhaltige, regionale und souveräne Versorgungssysteme zu etablieren. In der transdisziplinären Zusammenarbeit mit Praxis- und Transferpartnern standen dafür die besonderen Ansprüche, Kompetenzen und Merkmale der Transformationspioniere im Mittelpunkt der Analyse. Die zentrale Forschungsfrage richtete sich auf die Potenziale der alternativen Wirtschaftsweisen für die Verdrängung nicht-nachhaltiger Formen der Ernährungswirtschaft und die Neuerfindung eines zukunftsfähigen Ernährungssystems, einschließlich der dabei hemmenden Faktoren. Über den Bereich der Ernährungswirtschaft hinaus liefert das Buch Erkenntnisse, welch wichtige Rolle transformative Unternehmen für eine Kehre zu nachhaltiger Entwicklung einnehmen können.